Clinical Significance of Non-neutropenic Fever in the Management of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients Treated with Rituximab-CHOP: Comparison with Febrile Neutropenia and Risk Factor Analysis

Interstitial lung disease presents with varying characteristics in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing rituximab-containing therapies

Although the incidence and outcomes of rituximab-induced interstitial lung disease (RILD) have been partially reported, there are no systematic studies on the characteristics and types of RILD. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) findings, and treatment course of RILD in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We retrospectively analyzed the data from 321 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma who developed RILD between 2020 and 2022. The extent, distribution, and radiologic patterns of interstitial lung disease were determined using high-resolution computed tomography of the chest. BAL was performed in 299 (93.1%) patients to determine cellular distribution patterns and identify pathogenic microorganisms using metagenomic next-generation sequencing. All patients received combination therapy, with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone being the most commonly administered regimens. The median time from treatment to RILD development was 1.7 months. In the 217 patients who underwent metagenomic next-generation sequencing, 179 pathogenic microorganisms were detected, including 77 (43.0%) bacteria, 45 (25.1%) viruses, 28 (15.6%) Pneumocystis jirovecii strains, 17 (9.5%) fungi, 6 (3.5%) Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and 6 (3.5%) atypical pathogens. All RILD diagnoses were based on multidisciplinary team discussions and compliance with international standards. In conclusion, RILD exhibits a range of radiological and BAL patterns, reflecting different interstitial lung disease types. The most common patterns of RILD are infectious lung disease, organizing pneumonia, and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. These findings enhance the understanding of RILD in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and serve as a reference for best management guidelines in these patients.

The effect of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during haematopoietic cell transplantation on infection episodes, exposure to treatment antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance: a single-centre retrospective cohort study

Objectives

Fluroquinolone prophylaxis during haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains contentious. We aimed to determine its effectiveness and association with exposure to treatment antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance.

Methods

All admission episodes for HCT (N = 400 , 372 unique patients) in a tertiary centre between January 2020 and December 2022 were studied. Allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) recipients received prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, while autologous HCT (auto-HCT) recipients did not.

Results

Allo-HCT was performed for 43.3% (173/400) of patients, auto-HCT for 56.7% (227/400). Allo-HCT was associated with an average of 1.01 fewer infection episodes per 100 admission days (95% CI 0.62-1.40, P < 0.001) compared with auto-HCT. In allo-HCT, the total exposure to all antimicrobials was higher [+24.8 days of therapy (DOT)/100 admission days, P < 0.001], as was exposure to ciprofloxacin (+40.5 DOT/100 admission days, P < 0.001). By contrast, exposure to meropenem (-4.5 DOT/100 admission days, P = 0.02), piperacillin/tazobactam (-5.2 DOT/100 admission days, P < 0.001), aminoglycosides (-4.5 DOT/100 admission days, P < 0.001) and glycopeptides (-6.4 DOT/100 admission days, P < 0.001) was reduced. Enterobacteriaceae isolated during allo-HCT were more resistant to ciprofloxacin (65.5%, 19/29 versus 6.1%, 2/33, P < 0001), ceftriaxone (65.5%, 19/29 versus 9.1%, 3/33, P < 0.001), other antimicrobial classes. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci were more common in allo-HCT recipients (11%, 19/173 versus 0.9%, 2/227, P < 0.001). Inpatient mortality during allo- and auto-HCT was 9.8% (17/173) and 0.4% (1/227). respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis in allo-HCT was associated with fewer infection episodes and reduced exposure to treatment antimicrobials. Mortality in auto-HCT remained low. A significant burden of antimicrobial resistance was detected in allo-HCT recipients.

Not all bad: Drug-induced interstitial pneumonia in DLBCL patients is potentially fatal but could be linked to better survival

BACKGROUND

Interstitial pneumonitis (IP), a fatal complication of DLBCL treatment, can bring great challenges to clinicians. We retrospectively investigated clinical characteristics and risk factors of previous IP patients, and analyzed their survival data.

METHODS

556 DLBCL patients receiving CHOP-like regimens were enrolled between 2013 and 2018 in Sichuan Cancer Hospital.

FINDINGS

The IP incidences were 4.9 % (27/556), 1.1 % (2/186), 5.2 % (10/191) and 8.4 % (15/179) in CHOP, R-CHOP and R-CDOP groups respectively (P = 0.005). When IP was diagnosed, monocyte and IL-6 were significantly higher while CD4 and CD4/CD8 significantly lower compared to baseline. 81.5 % (22/27) of IP patients were pathogen-negative with good response to glucocorticoid monotherapy. Only one patient died while the others recovered from IP and subsequently underwent previous chemotherapy. 19.2 % (5/26) of IP patients experienced IP recurrence, likely due to the reason of lower initial dose or faster withdrawal speed of glucocorticoid. Multivariate analysis identified male, in addition to G-CSF, rituximab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as risk factors. The 3-year PFS and OS were 74.1 % and 46.9 % respectively for patients with IP.

INTERPRETATION

We suggest that IL-6, monocyte and CD4 should be monitored closely, especially in R-CHOP/R-CDOP group. Sufficient initial dose and slow decrease of glucocorticoid based on radiographic remissions were critical strategies to reduce IP recurrence. We speculate that drug-induced immune imbalance could be trigger of developing IP, causing a lower intensity cytokine storm, resulting in a potential immunotherapy. This complication might bring benefit in patients' survival through a mechanism similar to PD-1.

Incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia utilizing a polymerase chain reaction-based diagnosis in patients receiving bendamustine

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a life-threatening infection occurring in patients receiving bendamustine. The poorly defined incidence, particularly when utilizing polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostic techniques, precipitates unclear prophylaxis recommendations. Our objective was to determine the cumulative incidence of PJP diagnosed by single copy target, non-nested PCR in patients receiving bendamustine.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated for PJP from initiation of bendamustine through 9 months after the last administration. The cumulative incidence of PJP was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to demonstrate the strength of association between the independent variables and PJP risk.

RESULTS

This single-center, retrospective cohort included 486 adult patients receiving bendamustine from 1 January 2006 through 1 August 2019. Most patients received bendamustine-based combination therapy (n = 461, 94.9%), and 225 (46.3%) patients completed six cycles. Rituximab was the most common concurrent agent (n = 431, 88.7%). The cumulative incidence of PJP was 1.7% (95% CI 0.8%-3.3%, at maximum follow-up of 2.5 years), after the start of bendamustine (n = 8 PJP events overall). Prior stem cell transplant, prior chemotherapy within 1 year of bendamustine, and lack of concurrent chemotherapy were associated with the development of PJP in univariate analyses. Anti-Pneumocystis prophylaxis was not significantly associated with a reduction in PJP compared to no prophylaxis (HR 0.37, 95% CI (0.05, 3.04), p = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Our incidence of PJP below 3.5%, the conventional threshold for prophylaxis implementation, indicates routine anti-Pneumocystis prophylaxis may not be necessary in this population. Factors indicating a high-risk population for targeted prophylaxis require further investigation.

Infectious complications during immunochemotherapy of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease–can we decrease the risk? Two case reports and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a heterogeneous group of diseases that develop after solid organ and hematopoietic stem cells transplantation related to intensive immunosuppression regimen, T-cell depletion and Epstein-Barr virus infection. Despite the improvement in the management of PTLD, the prognosis remains poor. Here we report the management of two transplanted patients with PTLD and infections during immunochemotherapy (ICTH).

CASE SUMMARY

Of 65-year-old woman 11 years after kidney transplantation (first case) presented with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) CS III and started ICHT according to R-CHOP protocol. Despite the secondary prevention of neutropenic fever, the patient developed grade 4 neutropenia with urinary and pulmonary tract infections after the fifth cycle. ICTH was continued in reduced doses up to 7 cycles followed by involved-field radiation therapy of the residual disease. The second case presents a 49-year-old man, 8 years after liver transplantation due to cirrhosis in the course of chronic hepatitis B, who started ICTH for DLBCL Burkitt-like CS IV. The patient received four cycles of ICTH according to R-CODOX/R-IVAC protocol, with reduced doses. In both cases initially undertaken reduction of immunosuppression was ineffective to prevent infectious complications. Despite one incomplete ICHT treatment due to recurrent infections, both our patients remain in complete remission.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of immunosuppression and the doses of chemotherapeutics may be insufficient to prevent infectious complications during ICTH in PTLD patients.

Infection profiles of different chemotherapy regimens and the clinical feasibility of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with DLBCL

Various chemotherapy regimens are used to treat patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, treatment-related toxicity with a focus on infectious disease has not been fully reviewed. Several phase 3 trials have demonstrated different rates of febrile neutropenia (FN) between regimens (e.g. dose-adjusted (DA) EPOCH-R vs. R-CHOP). With heterogeneous patient characteristics, a combination regimen of lenalidomide or ibrutinib with R-CHOP exhibited promising efficacy with moderate infectious toxicity. While R-bendamustine is feasible for patients who don't tolerate other forms of chemotherapy, clinical data indicate increased opportunistic infections under prolonged lymphopenia. The usefulness of prophylactic antibiotics/antifungal agents in DLBCL patients is controversial owing to shorter and less severe neutropenia than with the induction regimen for acute leukemia or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor is recommended for intensive regimens such as DA-EPOCH-R, R-DHAP, or R-ICE. Regardless of multiple studies about FN incidence, studies focusing on microbiologic events are limited, and further investigations are warranted.

Prognostic significance of infectious episodes occurring during first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma - A nationwide cohort study

Infections during first-line therapy for DLBCL are often associated with chemotherapy dose reductions and increased mortality. Systemic infections have also been suggested as beneficial promotors of immunological responses. However, whether there is an association between the timing of an infectious episode and outcome during treatment has not yet been clarified. We investigated how the occurrence and timing of infectious episodes during the first line of treatment for "de novo" DLBCL influenced patient outcome. We used data on DLBCL patients from the Danish Lymphoma Registry, the Danish National Patient Registry, and the Danish National Pathology Registry. Infections were categorized according to type (ICD-10) and time of occurrence after treatment start. "Early" infections were defined as occurring between days 7 and 42 and "late" infections between days 100 and 150 from treatment start. Patients experiencing both "early and late" infections were categorized separately. We used multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates to assess the association between infections and survival adjusting for NCCN-IPI, sex, comorbidity, and rituximab treatment. We identified 3546 patients, median age 65 years (IQR 56,73). Infectious episodes occurred in 1171 (33%) patients, of which 666 had "early," 303 "late," and 202 both "early and late" events. Patients without registered infections had a 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 74%. Those with "early," "late," or "early+late" had 5-year OS of 65%, 62%, and 53%, respectively. Compared with patients without any registered infections, hazard rate ratios (HR) were 1.24 (95% CI 1.05-1.47), 1.32 (95% CI 1.06-1.63), and 1.59 (95% CI 1.27-2.00), respectively, in the multivariable model. We observed that infectious episodes during first-line treatment for "de novo" DLBCL occurred in 44% of the patients. Irrespective of timing, patients with infectious episodes had an inferior outcome compared to those without. Outcome patterns were similar for patients registered with sepsis.

A phase II study of ibrutinib in combination with rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin hydrochloride-vincristine sulfate-prednisone therapy in Epstein-Barr virus-positive, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (54179060LYM2003: IVORY study): results of the final analysis

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) provokes a critical oncogenic mechanism to activate intracellular signaling by LMP1. LMP1 specifically mimics the role of BTK-dependent B cell receptor. Therefore, a trial considering RCHOP therapy along with ibrutinib (I-RCHOP) in combination was conducted among patients with EBV-positive DLBCL. This study was an open-label, single-arm, prospective multicenter phase II clinical trial. Patients received 560 mg of ibrutinib with RCHOP every 3 weeks until 6 cycles were completed or progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was objective response, while secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival. A matched case-control analysis was completed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of I-RCHOP and RCHOP, respectively, in EBV-positive DLBCL patients. From September 2016 to August 2019, 24 patients proven to have EBV-positive DLBCL in the tissue were enrolled and received I-RCHOP. Their median age was 58 years (range, 28-84 years). The objective overall response was 66.7%, including 16 patients who achieved complete response after 6 cycles. Patients aged younger than 65 years presented a superior OR (87.5%) as compared with those older than 65 years (25.0%; p = 0.01). In a matched case-control study, I-RCHOP therapy provoked a more favorable complete response rate (87.3%) than did RCHOP (68.8%) in those younger than 65 years. Treatment-related mortality was linked most frequently with I-RCHOP therapy (four patients presented with unusual infection without Gr3/4 neutropenia) in the older age group (age ≥ 65 years). In conclusion, in this phase II trial for EBV-positive DLBCL, I-RCHOP was effective but did not show a significant improvement in response and survival in comparison with RCHOP. Also, I-RCHOP promoted serious toxicity and treatment-related death in older patients.

Pneumocystis pneumonia versus rituximab-induced interstitial lung disease in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy

It is difficult to differentiate Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) from rituximab-induced interstitial lung disease (RILD) in lymphoma patients with diffuse pulmonary infiltrates who are receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy. Using a clinical scoring system, we aim to differentiate PCP from RILD who are receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy. We reviewed the medical records of lymphoma patients who had received rituximab-containing chemotherapy between 2012 and 2015 in a tertiary hospital. Among 613 lymphoma patients receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy, 97 (16%) had diffuse pulmonary infiltrates. Of these, 16 (16%) with an alternative diagnosis and 22 (23%) with an indeterminate diagnosis were excluded. Finally, 21 (22%) patients were classified as having PCP and the remaining 38 (39%) as having RILD. Fever, short duration of symptoms (≤5 days), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and severe extent of disease on CT scan (>75%) were more common in patients with PCP than in those with RILD. Clinical scores were determined using the following system: SIRS = score 1, symptom duration ≤5 days = score 1, extent of disease on CT >75% = score 4. A score of ≥2 differentiated PCP from RILD with 91% sensitivity (95% CI, 70-99) and 71% specificity (95% CI, 54-84). A clinical scoring system based on presence of SIRS, short duration of symptoms, and severe extent of disease on CT scan appears to be useful in differentiation of PCP from RILD.

Incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of interstitial pneumonia in patients with lymphoma

Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a lethal complication in lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy. A total of 2212 consecutive patients diagnosed with lymphoma between 2009 and 2014 were enrolled in the present study. IP was defined as diffuse pulmonary interstitial infiltrate found on computed tomography scans. IP was observed in 106 patients. Of these, 23 patients were excluded from the study. Finally, 83 patients with IP were included in this study. The incidence of IP was 3.9% (7/287) in Hodgkin lymphoma and 2.4% (76/1925) in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (P = 0.210). The median number of chemotherapy cycles before IP was 3. The median time from the cessation of chemotherapy to IP was 17 days. Eighty-two (98.8%) patients recovered after the treatment with glucocorticoids. Sixty-six (79.5%) patients had a delay in chemotherapy, and 14 (16.9%) patients had premature termination of chemotherapy. Sixty-nine patients were re-treated with chemotherapy after remission from IP, of which 22 (31.9%) experienced IP recurrence. The incidence of IP recurrence was significantly higher in patients re-treated with a similar regimen than in those re-treated with an alternative regimen (65.4 vs. 11.6%, P < 0.001). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, B symptoms and a history of drug allergies were identified as risk factors for IP. In conclusion, IP is a life-threatening complication in lymphoma patients. Glucocorticoid therapy with continuous monitoring of chest radiographic changes may be a favourable strategy for treating IP. However, IP may recur, especially in patients re-treated with a similar chemotherapy regimen.

Patterns of growth factor usage and febrile neutropenia among older patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: the Intergroup experience (CALGB 9793; ECOG-SWOG 4494)

Patterns of myeloid growth factor (GF) usage and febrile neutropenia (FN) were examined in patients >60 years of age with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (DLBCL) enrolled on CALGB 9793/ECOG-SWOG 4494, receiving initial therapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) or rituximab + CHOP (R-CHOP). Myeloid GFs were administered to 256/520 (49%) patients. Indications for use were: prevent dose reduction/dose delay (81%, 207/256); treat FN or non-febrile neutropenia (NFN) (19%, 48/256). One or more FN episodes occurred in 41% (212/520) of patients, with FN most often in cycle 1 (38% of episodes). In multivariate analysis, risk factors for FN included age >65 years (odds ratio (OR) = 2.6, 95% CI: [1.4, 4.9]) and anemia (hemoglobin <12 g/dl) (OR =2.2, 95% confidence intervals (CI): [1.4, 3.5]. Myeloid GF use was common in this older DLBCL population receiving CHOP-based therapy, as was FN, especially during cycle one. Risk factors predictive for FN should be used prospectively to identify patients for whom myeloid GFs are best utilized.

Neoplastic fever in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma

The development of fever is a common complication in the clinical course of cancer. If all other potential causes of fever are excluded, the possibility of neoplastic fever should be considered. The aim of the present study was to determine the incidence of neoplastic fever in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Between January 2009 and December 2014, 195 patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma (111 men and 84 women; mean age, 55 years) were admitted to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery of Mie University Graduate School of Medicine (Tsu, Japan). Episodes of fever were observed in 58 patients (30%), of whom 11 (5.5%) had neoplastic fever (mean maximum temperature, 38.9°C). The causes of neoplastic fever were as follows: Primary tumor (n=3), local recurrence (n=1), metastasis (n=5), and local recurrence with metastasis (n=2). Of the 11 patients, 9 were treated with naproxen and 8 exhibited a complete response, with their temperature normalizing to <37.3°C within 24 h. The 2 patients who were not treated with naproxen underwent surgical tumor resection, which resulted in prompt and complete lysis of the fever. In conclusion, neoplastic fever occurred in 5.5% of the 195 patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas investigated herein. Naproxen may be effective for treating neoplastic fever in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma; however, radical tumor treatment may have to be considered to achieve permanent lysis of the fever.

Can mortality of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia be improved?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neutropenic fever is the most common infective complication in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, and may result in severe sepsis, septic shock and mortality. Advancements in approaches to empiric antimicrobial therapy and prophylaxis have resulted in improved outcomes. Mortality may, however, still be as high as 50% in high-risk cancer populations. The objective of this review is to summarize factors associated with reduced mortality in patients with neutropenic fever, highlighting components of clinical care with potential for inclusion in quality improvement programs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Risks for mortality are multifactorial, and include patient, disease and treatment-related factors. Historically, guidelines for management of neutropenic fever have focused upon antimicrobial therapy. There is, however, a recognized need for early identification of sepsis to enable timely administration of antibiotic therapy and for this to be integrated with a whole of systems approach within healthcare facilities. Use of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria is beneficial, but validation is required in neutropenic fever populations.

SUMMARY

In the context of emerging and increasing infections because of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in patients with neutropenic fever, quality improvement initiatives to reduce mortality must encompass antimicrobial stewardship, early detection of sepsis, and use of valid tools for clinical assessment. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin hold potential for inclusion into clinical pathways for management of neutropenic fever.