Tumor Stage-Related Role of Radiotherapy in Patients with an External Auditory Canal and Middle Ear Carcinoma

The international expert consensus on management of external auditory canal carcinoma

PURPOSE

The objective of this consensus is to provide otolaryngologists with appropriate strategies in the management of external auditory canal (EAC) carcinoma.

METHODS

In the absence of randomized controlled trials, the consensus is based on expert opinions utilizing the Rand/UCLA appropriateness method [Fitch and Aguilar in The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2001], drawing from existing literature and clinical experience.

RESULTS

The management recommendations are structured around 12 key areas, including: definition and pathology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, work-up, tumor staging system, surgical management of primary tumor, surgical management of the parotid gland and the temporomandibular joint, lymph node metastasis, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, reconstruction, and follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Management strategies for EAC carcinoma rely on tumor extension and histopathological features. Surgical removal with free surgical margins or combination with radiotherapy, chemotherapy are most often the best options. Given the rarity of the disease, prospective, randomized, multi-institutional clinical trials should be designed to enable reliable comparisons of the outcomes of EAC carcinoma treatments, thereby providing evidence-based clinical data to establish widely accepted guidelines. It emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary team to be involved in the management of EAC carcinoma, and regular follow-up should be implemented postoperatively.

Survival Outcomes of Temporal Bone Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TBSCC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis, and optimal treatment for advanced cases is uncertain. Our systematic literature review aimed to assess 5-year survival outcomes for advanced TBSCC across different treatment modalities.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for articles published between January 1989 and June 2023.

RESULTS

The review yielded 1229 citations of which 31 provided 5-year survival data for TBSCC. The final analysis included 1289 patients. T classification data was available for 1269 patients and overall stage for 1033 patients. Data for 5-year overall survival (OS) was 59.6%. Five-year OS was 81.9% for T1/2 and 47.5% for T3/4 (P < .0001). OS for T1/T2 cancers did not significantly differ between surgery and radiation (100% vs 81.3%, P  = .103). For advanced-stage disease (T3/T4), there was no statistical difference in OS when comparing surgery with postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (OS 50.0%) versus surgery with postoperative radiotherapy (XRT) (OS 53.3%) versus definitive CRT (OS 58.1%, P  = .767-1.000). There was not enough data to assess the role of neoadjuvant CRT.

CONCLUSION

Most patients will present with advanced-stage disease, and nodal metastasis is seen in nearly 22% of patients. This study confirms the prognostic correlation of the current T classification system. Our results suggest that OS did not differ significantly between surgery and XRT for early stage disease, and combined treatment modalities yield similar 5-year OS for advanced cancers.

Analysis of Prognostic Factors For External Auditory Canal Carcinoma: A 22-Year Experience

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in patients with the external auditory canal (EAC) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with EAC SCC and treated with curative intent at a single tertiary institution were retrospectively reviewed over a 22-year period. Treatment modalities included surgery with adjuvant treatment or definitive radiotherapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

There were 51 patients in our cohort. The 5-year OS and DSS were 64.0% ± 7.0% and 72.0% ± 7.0% respectively. Patients in the surgical arm and RT arm showed no significant difference in OS, DSS, and LRFS (p = 0.075, 0.062, 0.058 respectively). Compared to other routes of spread within the temporal bone, pattern of posterior disease invasion (involving mastoid/sigmoid sinus) showed poorer OS and DSS on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, HR4.34 and 5.88; p = 0.006 and 0.009). On multivariate analysis, the following factors were independently prognostic of poorer OS and DSS: Previous radiotherapy (HR 3.29 and 4.81, p = 0.021 and p = 0.029); Presence of facial nerve palsy (HR 3.80 and 7.63, p = 0.013 and p = 0.003); Posterior pattern of invasion (HR4.05 and 3.59, p = 0.013 and p = 0.043). Advanced modified Pittsburgh stage was not predictive of poor OS and DSS (HR1.17 and 1.17 E+5, p = 0.786 and p = 0.961).

CONCLUSION

Presence of previous radiotherapy, facial nerve palsy and posterior pattern of disease invasion were independent prognostic factors of poorer survival in patients with EAC SCC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:2203-2210, 2023.

Preoperative simulation using three-dimensional printer in four temporal bone surgeries

Preoperative simulation using a three-dimensional printer is effective to perform safe surgery by knowing the range limit of drilling in the temporal bone. Moreover, simulations using models are thought to be useful for education of young surgeon.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Expecting Its Application in Temporal Bone Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Temporal bone malignant tumors are characterized by atypical clinical symptoms, and easy recurrence and metastasis. They account for 0.2% of head and neck tumors, and the most common pathological type is squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the temporal bone are often at advanced stages when diagnosed, and lose the chance for surgery. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has recently been approved as the first-line treatment for refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. However, it remains to be determined whether neoadjuvant immunotherapy can be used as the first-line treatment for temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma to reduce the tumor stage before surgery, or as a palliative treatment for patients with unresectable advanced stage carcinoma. The present study reviews the development of immunotherapy and its clinical application in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, summarizes the treatment of temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma, and prospects the neoadjuvant immunotherapy as the first-line treatment for temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma.

Clinical outcomes of temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma: A single-institution experience

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the survival outcomes and potential prognostic factors of patients with temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TBSCC) treated at our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients who were diagnosed with TBSCC between 2008 and 2019. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to describe overall survival (OS), and the association between baseline characteristics and prognoses was examined using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Fifty consecutive patients with TBSCC were included in this study. The results showed that patients with advanced modified Pittsburgh (MPB)- T classifications had a poorer prognosis (T3 vs. T1-2: HR: 2.81, 95% CI: 0.34-23.43; T4 vs. T1-2: HR: 7.25, 95% CI: 0.95-55.41; p = 0.041). Meanwhile, middle ear squamous cell carcinoma (MESCC) showed a significantly worse prognosis than external auditory canal squamous cell carcinoma (EACSCC, HR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.04-6.76, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

MESCC and advanced MPB-T classifications might be considered predictors of unfavorable outcomes in patients with TBSCC, indicating that special attention should be paid to the original tumor subsite and tumor extension in the management of patients with TBSCC.

Evaluating the prognostic contributions of TNM classifications and building novel staging schemes for middle ear squamous cell carcinoma

Background

A universally acknowledged cancer staging system considering all aspects of the T‐, N‐, and M‐classifications for middle ear squamous cell carcinoma (MESCC) remains absent, limiting the clinical management of MESCC patients.

Materials and Methods

A total of 214 MESCC patients were extracted from the SEER (the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database between 1973 and 2016. The relationships between patient’s characteristics and prognoses were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Novel staging schemes for MESCC were designed by adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) modeling method according to the combinations of Stell’s T‐classification and the eighth AJCC N‐ and M‐classifications, of which performances were evaluated based on five criteria: hazard consistency, hazard discrimination, explained variation, likelihood difference, and balance.

Results

T‐classification was the most significant prognostic factor for MESCC patients in multivariable analysis (p = 0.021). The N‐ and M‐classifications also had obvious prognostic effect but were not statistically significant by multivariate analysis due to the limited metastasis events. Three novel staging schemes (AHR‐Ⅰ–Ⅲ models, different combination of T‐ and N‐classifications) and ST (solely derived from Stell’s T‐classification) were developed, among which the AHR‐Ⅰ staging scheme performed best.

Conclusions

Tumor extension, quantified by Stell’s T‐classification, is the most significant prognostic factor for MESCC patients. However, our AHR‐Ⅰ staging scheme, a comprehensive staging scheme that integrating T‐, N‐, and M‐classifications, might be an optimal option for clinical practitioners to predict MESCC patients’ prognosis and make proper clinical decisions.

A retrospective analysis of radiotherapy in the treatment of external auditory canal carcinoma

External auditory canal carcinoma (EACC) is a rare disease. The current study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for EACC. The present study retrospectively reviewed 34 consecutive patients treated for EACC with EBRT between February 2001 and January 2019 at the University of Tokyo Hospital. Clinical staging was performed according to the modified Pittsburgh classification. Of all the included patients, seven patients were in the early stages (I or II) and 27 in the advanced stages (III or IV) of EACC. A total of 16 patients underwent EBRT and surgery (S+RT) pre- and/or postoperatively, while 18 patients underwent definitive radiotherapy (dRT). The median prescribed doses for the S+RT and dRT groups were 66 and 70 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up period for all patients was 22.4 months (range, 2-205 months). The 5-year overall survival rates of the S+RT and dRT groups were 66.7 and 45.1%, respectively. The progression-free survival rate at 5-year was 55.6% (95% confidence interval: 36.5-71.1%) for the entire cohort. A total of 14 patients experienced disease relapse after treatment, consisting of 11 locoregional recurrences and three distant metastases. The current study revealed the clinical outcomes of EBRT for EACC.

Evaluation of the modified Pittsburgh classification for predicting the disease-free survival outcome of squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal

Background

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the external auditory canal (EAC) is a rare disease, which is commonly classified with the modified Pittsburgh classification. Our aim was to evaluate the predictive performance of this classification in relation to disease‐free survival (DFS).

Methods

We examined retrospective data from a nationwide Dutch cohort study including patients with primary EAC SCC. These data were combined with individual patient data from the literature. Using the combined data, the predictive performances were calculated using the c‐index.

Results

A total of 381 patients were included, 294 for clinical and 281 for the pathological classification analyses. The c‐indices of the clinical and the pathological modified Pittsburgh classification predicting DFS were 0.725 (0.668‐0.782) and 0.729 (0.672‐0.786), respectively.

Conclusion

The predictive performance of the modified Pittsburgh classification system as such appears to be acceptable to predict the DFS of EAC SCC. Other factors need to be added to a future model to improve the predicted performance.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the temporal bone: A current review

OBJECTIVES

The rarity of temporal bone squamous cell carcinoma (TBSCC) precludes a clear understanding of the disease and approach to its management. This review provides general background on the disease and discusses the current and emerging oncologic and rehabilitative management options.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed literature review.

METHODS

A review of the current literature was conducted to assess and collate up-to-date information regarding TBSCC management.

RESULTS

TBSCC is a rare and aggressive disease arising in the ear canal, temporal bone, or extratemporal sites. Prior radiation, chronic ear disease, or habitual ear picking may contribute to primary disease development. Because the symptoms of TBSCC and benign otologic disease are similar, TBSCC diagnosis may be delayed, allowing the tumor time to spread throughout the anatomically intricate temporal bone. The extent of the disease is determined based on imaging and is usually staged with the Pittsburgh Staging System. Temporal bone resection with parotidectomy and neck dissection is the current standard of care. Survival is generally good for early disease and poor for advanced disease, but chemotherapy is emerging as a promising treatment option. Auditory rehabilitation with osseointegrated hearing aids is recommended at initial oncologic resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge of and outcomes for TBSCC have improved with time, but because of the aggressive nature of the disease and the anatomic intricacy of the temporal bone, TBSCC treatment is complex and should be delivered by a multidisciplinary team. Inter-institutional collaboration may accelerate research for this rare disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Management of Temporal Bone Malignancy in Ireland

Objectives  Lateral temporal bone malignancy remains a challenging rare disease. We report 17 years of multidisciplinary care of these tumors with univariate and multivariate analyses of key prognostic indicators for consideration in contemporary oncological management. Design  This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting  This is set at a tertiary referral center. Participants  All patients presenting with histopathologically newly diagnosed cases of temporal bone malignancy between 2000 and 2017 were included. Main Outcome Measures  The main outcome measures are disease-specific and recurrence-free survival rates. Results  In this study, 48 cases of temporal bone malignancy were diagnosed. Median age at diagnosis was 69 years (range: 5-88). Fourteen patients were female. Squamous cell carcinoma was the predominant malignancy in 34 cases (71%). Surgical treatment was undertaken in 37 patients. Mean length of follow-up was 32 months (range: 0.7-117). Overall 5-year disease-specific survival was 52.4%, while overall 5-year recurrence-free survival was 53.5%. On univariate analysis, significantly worse survival was seen in females ( p  = 0.008), those with distant metastatic disease ( p  = 0.041), and in middle ear involvement ( p  = 0.012) with no difference for involvement of the external auditory canal ( p  = 0.98) or mastoid ( p  = 0.78). Only middle ear involvement remained significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusion  A wide variety of malignant pathology may present in the temporal bone. Recurrence-free survival is equivalent to international data; however, this figure is low. This emphasizes the need to treat these tumors appropriately with radical resection, where possible, at first presentation. Therefore, multidisciplinary surgical input is recommended. Middle ear involvement was a negative prognosticator for disease-specific and recurrence-free survivals.

A retrospective multicenter study of carbon-ion radiotherapy for external auditory canal and middle ear carcinomas

Background

We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to assess the clinical outcomes of carbon‐ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for head and neck malignancies (Japan Carbon‐Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group [J‐CROS] study: 1402 HN). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CIRT in patients with external auditory canal (EAC) and middle ear (ME) carcinomas.

Methods

Thirty‐one patients treated with CIRT at four Japanese institutions were analyzed. Fourteen patients (45.2%) had squamous cell carcinomas, 13 (41.9%) had adenoid cystic carcinomas, and four (12.9%) had other types. Nineteen (61.3%), six (19.4%), three (9.7%), and three (9.7%) patients had T4, T3, T2, and T1 disease, respectively. All patients had N0M0 status. The median radiation dose was 64 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 16 fractions. The median gross tumor volume was 33.3 mL.

Results

The median follow‐up period was 18.4 months (range, 5.1‐85.6). The 1‐ and 3‐year local control and overall survival rates were 75.0% and 55.0% and 79.3% and 58.7%, respectively. Regarding grade 3 or higher toxicities, three patients (9.7%) had grade 3 dermatitis, one (3.2%) had grade 3 mucositis, and two (6.5%) had grade 3 central nervous necrosis (ie, radiation‐induced brain necrosis). No grade 4 or worse reactions were observed.

Conclusion

CIRT was effective for EAC and ME carcinomas.

The Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Carcinoma of the External Auditory Canal: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical characteristics and evaluate the surgical outcomes of carcinoma of the external auditory canal (CEAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 31 patients from four multicenter hospitals, who were diagnosed and surgically treated for CEAC in 2009-2014, were enrolled for this retrospective study. Medical records were reviewed to determine cancer stage according to the Pittsburgh classification. Clinical data of age, sex, site, initial symptoms, surgery extent, postoperative complications including recurrence, follow-up period, and current patient status were collected for analysis. Five-year cumulative survival rate was obtained using Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

At initial diagnosis, 22 patients were in the early stages (stage I: 15; stage II: 7) and 9 patients were in the advanced stages (stage III: 1; stage IV: 8). Lymph node metastasis was present in 5 patients and distant metastasis in 2. Of the 31 patients, 4 patients died (stage II: 1, stage IV: 3) during the follow-up period. Early-stage patients showed 100% 5-year estimated cumulative survival rate, whereas the advanced-stage patients showed 5-year estimated survival rate of 53.6% (p=.006). The overall survival rate of all enrolled patients was 90.3%. Although 5-year estimated disease-free survival rate of stage I was 100.0%, that for stage II was low at 30.0% because of considerable recurrences.

CONCLUSION

The results of this multicenter study suggest that more aggressive treatment modality, including adjuvant therapy, is necessary for patients with CEAC with Pittsburgh stage II or more.