Opioid receptor activation triggering downregulation of cAMP improves effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs in treatment of glioblastoma

PKA inhibition kills L-asparaginase-resistant leukemic cells from relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

Despite the success in treating newly diagnosed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (aLL), the long-term cure rate for the 20% of children who relapse is poor, making relapsed aLL the primary cause of cancer death in children. By unbiased genome-wide retroviral RNAi screening and knockdown studies, we previously discovered opioid receptor mu 1 (OPRM1) as a new aLL cell resistance biomarker for the aLL chemotherapeutic drug, L-asparaginase, i.e., OPRM1 loss triggers L-asparaginase resistance. Indeed, aLL cell OPRM1 level is inversely proportional to L-asparaginase IC50: the lower the OPRM1 level, the higher the L-asparaginase IC50, indicating that aLL cells expressing reduced OPRM1 levels show resistance to L-asparaginase. In the current study, we utilized OPRM1-expressing and -knockdown aLL cells as well as relapsed patient aLL cells to identify candidate targeted therapy for L-asparaginase-resistant aLL. In OPRM1-expressing cells, L-asparaginase induces apoptosis via a cascade of events that include OPRM1-mediated decline in [cAMP]i, downregulation of PKA-mediated BAD S118 phosphorylation that can be reversed by 8-CPT-cAMP, cyt C release from the mitochondria, and subsequent caspase activation and PARP1 cleavage. The critical role of PKA inhibition due to a decrease in [cAMP]i in this apoptotic process is evident in the killing of OPRM1-knockdown and low OPRM1-expressing relapsed patient aLL cells by the PKA inhibitors, H89 and 14-22 amide. These findings demonstrate for the first time that PKA can be targeted to kill aLL cells resistant to L-asparaginase due to OPRM1 loss, and that H89 and 14-22 amide may be utilized to destroy L-asparaginase-resistant patient aLL cells.

Anesthesia and cancer recurrence: a narrative review

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. With the increasingly aging population, the number of emerging cancer cases is expected to increase markedly in the foreseeable future. Surgical resection with adjuvant therapy is the best available option for the potential cure of many solid tumors; thus, approximately 80% of patients with cancer undergo at least one surgical procedure during their disease. Agents used in general anesthesia can modulate cytokine release, transcription factors, and/or oncogenes. This can affect host immunity and the capability of cancer cells to survive and migrate, not only during surgery but for up to several weeks after surgery. However, it remains unknown whether exposure to anesthetic agents affects cancer recurrence or metastasis. This review explores the current literature to explain whether and how the choice of anesthetic and perioperative medication affect cancer surgery outcomes.

Antineoplastic Activity of 9″-Lithospermic Acid Methyl Ester in Glioblastoma Cells

To date, many potent compounds have been found which are derived from plants and herbs and possess anticancer properties due to their antioxidant effects. 9″-Lithospermic acid methyl ester is an effective natural compound derived from the Thymus thracicus Velen. It has been proven that this compound has substantial properties in different diseases, but its effects in cancer have not been thoroughly evaluated. The aim of this work was to study the effects of 9″-Lithospermic acid methyl ester (9″-methyl lithospermate) in U87 and T98 glioblastoma cell lines. Its effects on cellular viability were assessed via Trypan Blue and Crystal Violet stains, the cell cycle analysis through flow cytometry, and cell migration by employing the scratch wound healing assay. The results demonstrated that 9″-methyl lithospermate was able to inhibit cellular proliferation, induce cellular death, and inhibit cell migration. Furthermore, these results were intensified by the addition of temozolomide, the most prominent chemotherapeutic drug in glioblastoma tumors. Further studies are needed to reproduce these findings in animal models and investigate if 9″-lithospermic acid methyl ester represents a potential new therapeutic addition for gliomas.

Methadone Potentiates the Cytotoxicity of Temozolomide by Impairing Calcium Homeostasis and Dysregulation of PARP in Glioblastoma Cells

Methadone is commonly used as an alternative to morphine in patients with pain associated with glioblastoma and other cancers. Although concomitant administration of methadone and cytostatics is relatively common, the effect of methadone on the efficacy of cytostatic drugs has not been well studied until recently. Moreover, the mechanism behind the effect of methadone on temozolomide efficacy has not been investigated in previous studies, or this effect has been automatically attributed to opioid receptors. Our findings indicate that methadone potentiates the effect of temozolomide on rat C6 glioblastoma cells and on human U251 and T98G glioblastoma cells and increases cell mortality by approximately 50% via a mechanism of action independent of opioid receptors. Our data suggest that methadone acts by affecting mitochondrial potential, the level of oxidative stress, intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration and possibly intracellular ATP levels. Significant effects were also observed on DNA integrity and on cleavage and expression of the DNA repair protein PARP-1. None of these effects were attributed to the activation of opioid receptors and Toll-like receptor 4. Our results provide an alternative perspective on the mechanism of action of methadone in combination with temozolomide and a potential strategy for the treatment of glioblastoma cell resistance to temozolomide.

Mapping the Evidence for Opioid-Mediated Changes in Malignancy and Chemotherapeutic Efficacy: Protocol for a Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Numerous reports contend opioids can augment or inhibit malignancy. At present, there is no consensus on the risk or benefit posed by opioids on malignancy or chemotherapeutic activity. Distinguishing the consequences of opioid use from pain and its management is challenging. Additionally, opioid concentration data is often lacking in clinical studies. A scoping review approach inclusive of preclinical and clinical data will improve our understanding of the risk-benefit relationship concerning commonly prescribed opioids and cancer and cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to map diverse studies spanning from preclinical to clinical regarding opioids with malignancy and its treatment.

METHODS

This scoping review will use the Arksey six stages framework to (1) identify the research question; (2) identify relevant studies; (3) select studies meeting criteria; (4) extract and chart data; (5) collate, summarize, and report results; and (6) conduct expert consultation. An initial pilot study was undertaken to (1) parameterize the extent and scale of existing data for an evidence review, (2) identify key factors to be extracted in systematic charting efforts, and (3) assess opioid concentration as a variable for its relevance to the central hypothesis. Six databases will be searched with no filters: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, Biological Sciences Collection, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. Trial registries will include ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane CENTRAL, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, European Union Clinical Trials Register, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry. Eligibility criteria will include preclinical and clinical study data on opioids effects on tumor growth or survival, or alteration on the antineoplastic activity of chemotherapeutics. We will chart data on (1) opioid concentration from human subjects with cancer, yielding a "physiologic range" to better interpret available preclinical data; (2) patterns of opioid exposure with disease and treatment-related patient outcomes; and (3) the influence of opioids on cancer cell survival, as well as opioid-related changes to cancer cell susceptibility for chemotherapeutics.

RESULTS

This scoping review will present results in narrative forms as well as with the use of tables and diagrams. Initiated in February 2021 at the University of Utah, this protocol is anticipated to generate a scoping review by August 2023. The results of the scoping review will be disseminated through scientific conference proceedings and presentations, stakeholder meetings, and by publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this scoping review will provide a comprehensive description of the consequences of prescription opioids on malignancy and its treatment. By incorporating preclinical and clinical data, this scoping review will invite novel comparisons across study types that could inform new basic, translational, and clinical studies regarding risks and benefits of opioid use among patients with cancer.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/38167.

Does the Choice of Anaesthesia Affect Cancer? A Molecular Crosstalk between Theory and Practice

In recent years, there has been an increasing scientific interest in the interaction between anaesthesia and cancer development. Retrospective studies show that the choice of anaesthetics may influence cancer outcome and cancer recurrence; however, these studies show contradictory results. Recently, some large randomized clinical trials have been completed, yet they show no significant effect of anaesthetics on cancer outcomes. In this scoping review, we compiled a body of in vivo and in vitro studies with the goal of evaluating the biological effects of anaesthetics on cancer cells in comparison to clinical effects as described in recent studies. It was found that sevoflurane, propofol, opioids and lidocaine are likely to display direct biological effects on cancer cells; however, significant effects are only found in studies with exposure to high concentrations of anaesthetics and/or during longer exposure times. When compared to clinical data, these differences in exposure and dose-effect relation, as well as tissue selectivity, population selection and unclear anaesthetic dosing protocols might explain the lack of outcome.

The µ-Opioid Receptor in Cancer and Its Role in Perineural Invasion: A Short Review and New Evidence

Cancer is a significant public health problem worldwide. While there has been a steady decrease in the cancer death rate over the last two decades, the number of survivors has increased and, thus, cancer-related sequela. Pain affects the life of patients with cancer and survivors. Prescription opioids continue as the analgesic of choice to treat moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. There has been controversy on whether opioids impact cancer progression by acting on cancer cells or the tumor microenvironment. The μ-opioid receptor is the site of action of prescription opioids. This receptor can participate in an important mechanism of cancer spread, such as perineural invasion. In this review, current evidence on the role of the μ-opioid receptor in cancer growth is summarized and preliminary evidence about its effect on the cross-talk between sensory neurons and malignant cells is provided.

Glioblastoma Multiforme Selective Nanomedicines for Improved Anti-Cancer Treatments

Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is a devastating disease with a low survival rate and few efficacious treatment options. The fast growth, late diagnostics, and off-target toxicity of currently used drugs represent major barriers that need to be overcome to provide a viable cure. Nanomedicines (NMeds) offer a way to overcome these pitfalls by protecting and loading drugs, increasing blood half-life, and being targetable with specific ligands on their surface. In this study, the FDA-approved polymer poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid was used to optimise NMeds that were surface modified with a series of potential GBM-specific ligands. The NMeds were fully characterised for their physical and chemical properties, and then in vitro testing was performed to evaluate cell uptake and GBM cell specificity. While all targeted NMeds showed improved uptake, only those decorated with the-cell surface vimentin antibody M08 showed specificity for GBM over healthy cells. Finally, the most promising targeted NMed candidate was loaded with the well-known chemotherapeutic, paclitaxel, to confirm targeting and therapeutic effects in C6 GBM cells. These results demonstrate the importance of using well-optimised NMeds targeted with novel ligands to advance delivery and pharmaceutical effects against diseased cells while minimising the risk for nearby healthy cells.

Meta analysis of bioactive compounds, miRNA, siRNA and cell death regulators as sensitizers to doxorubicin induced chemoresistance

Cancer has presented to be the most challenging disease, contributing to one in six mortalities worldwide. The current treatment regimen involves multiple rounds of chemotherapy administration, alone or in combination. The treatment has adverse effects including cardiomyopathy, hepatotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity. In addition, the development of resistance to chemo has been attributed to cancer relapse and low patient overall survivability. Multiple drug resistance development may be through numerous factors such as up-regulation of drug transporters, drug inactivation, alteration of drug targets and drug degradation. Doxorubicin is a widely used first line chemotherapeutic drug for a myriad of cancers. It has multiple intracellular targets, DNA intercalation, adduct formation, topoisomerase inhibition, iron chelation, reactive oxygen species generation and promotes immune mediated clearance of the tumor. Agents that can sensitize the resistant cancer cells to the chemotherapeutic drug are currently the focus to improve the clinical efficiency of cancer therapy. This review summarizes the recent 10-year research on the use of natural phytochemicals, inhibitors of apoptosis and autophagy, miRNAs, siRNAs and nanoformulations being investigated for doxorubicin chemosensitization.

Osteoarthritis-Induced Metabolic Alterations of Human Hip Chondrocytes

Osteoarthritis (OA) alters chondrocyte metabolism and mitochondrial biology. We explored whether OA and non-OA chondrocytes show persistent differences in metabolism and mitochondrial function and different responsiveness to cytokines and cAMP modulators. Hip chondrocytes from patients with OA or femoral neck fracture (non-OA) were stimulated with IL-1β, TNF, forskolin and opioid peptides. Mediators released from chondrocytes were measured, and mitochondrial functions and glycolysis were determined (Seahorse Analyzer). Unstimulated OA chondrocytes exhibited significantly higher release of IL-6, PGE₂ and MMP1 and lower production of glycosaminoglycan than non-OA chondrocytes. Oxygen consumption rates (OCR) and mitochondrial ATP production were comparable in unstimulated non-OA and OA chondrocytes, although the non-mitochondrial OCR was higher in OA chondrocytes. Compared to OA chondrocytes, non-OA chondrocytes showed stronger responses to IL-1β/TNF stimulation, consisting of a larger decrease in mitochondrial ATP production and larger increases in non-mitochondrial OCR and NO production. Enhancement of cAMP by forskolin prevented IL-1β-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in OA chondrocytes but not in non-OA chondrocytes. Endogenous opioids, present in OA joints, influenced neither cytokine-induced mitochondrial dysfunction nor NO upregulation. Glycolysis was not different in non-OA and OA chondrocytes, independent of stimulation. OA induces persistent metabolic alterations, but the results suggest upregulation of cellular mechanisms protecting mitochondrial function in OA.

Time to initiate randomized controlled clinical trials with methadone in cancer patients

Public media coverage has fueled a demand for methadone as potential cure for cancer itself. Because patients have asked for respective prescriptions, clinical societies issued statements warning against the use of methadone as long as preclinical findings have not been supported by clinical evidence. In fact, not all preclinical data clearly support relevant effects. However, strong epidemiologic data suggest beneficial effects of methadone on cancer. Alternative explanations, namely better safety of methadone or hidden selection bias, seem less likely. This uncertainty can only be resolved by randomized controlled clinical trials. This review discusses all relevant data pertinent to methadone and cancer, uncovers supportive epidemiologic data, and suggests possible study designs.

Less Well-Known Consequences of the Long-Term Use of Opioid Analgesics: A Comprehensive Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The adverse effects of short-term opioid analgesics are well known and acknowledged; however, the spectrum of the sequelae of long-term use seems less clear. Some effects may remain undetected but still have the potential to cause harm and reduce patients' quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the adverse effects of long-term opioid therapy.

METHODS

We performed a quasi-systematic search, analyzing articles published in the MEDLINE database between January 2000 and March 2021 that identified adverse effects of opioids used for chronic pain treatment.

RESULTS

Growing evidence indicates that there are multiple serious adverse effects of opioid treatment. Long-term opioid use may have significant effects on the endocrine, immune, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neural systems. Studies show that long-term opioid treatment increases the risk of fractures, infections, cardiovascular complications, sleep-disordered breathing, bowel dysfunction, overdose, and mortality. Opioids may potentially affect cancer development. Most consequences of the long-term use of opioids have been identified in studies of patients with non-malignant pain.

CONCLUSION

Studies indicate that long-term use of opioids increases the risk of drug-related events in a significant number of patients. Clinicians should be aware of these complications associated with prescribing opioids, discuss them with patients, prevent complications, if possible, and diagnose them early and manage adequately. More human studies are needed to assess the risk, including trials with individual opioids, because they have different adverse effect profiles.

D,L-Methadone enhances the cytotoxic activity of standard chemotherapeutic agents on pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma

Purpose

In advanced tumor stages, pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) shows an intrinsic resistance to standard chemotherapy, which is associated with a dismal prognosis. Alternative therapeutic approaches and optimization of already existent treatment protocols are urgently needed in these conditions. The µ-opioid receptor (OPRM1) agonist, D,L-methadone is frequently used for analgesia in oncological patients. Recent evidence has shown that D,L-methadone in combination with chemotherapeutic agents may enhance their cytotoxic effect against cancer cells. There are no related data in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).

Methods

Antitumor effects of combined D,L-methadone and doxorubicin, carboplatin, and vincristine on RMS cell lines RD and RH30 were analyzed using following outcome data: expression of the OPRM1 receptor (Western blot), cell growth inhibition (MTT assay), cell migration (wound-healing assay), apoptosis induction (caspase-3/7 assay), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (flow cytometry).

Results

In both cell lines, OPRM1 expression was significantly increased after combined treatment of D,L-methadone with all three cytotoxic drugs tested, which resulted in suppression of tumor cell growth and increase of apoptosis rates. These effects were mediated by increased ROS production and up-regulation of caspase-3/7 activity. Doxorubicin combined with D,L-methadone significantly reduced cell migration in both cell lines. Carboplatin or vincristine in combination with D,L-methadone had only an impact on cell migration in RH30 cells.

Conclusions

This new therapeutic approach in RMS provides strong antitumor effects in vitro. The combination of standard chemotherapy and D,L-methadone requires further investigation. Especially advanced tumors with a limited effectiveness of conventional treatment regimens seem a potential target of this approach.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-03945-y.

Dubious effects of methadone as an "anticancer" drug on ovarian cancer cell-lines and patient-derived tumor-spheroids

BACKGROUND

The opioid agonist D,L-methadone exerts analgesic effects via the mu opioid receptor, encoded by OPRM1 and therefore plays a role in chronic pain management. In preclinical tumor-models D,L-methadone shows apoptotic and chemo-sensitizing effects and was therefore hyped as an off-label "anticancer" drug without substantiation from clinical trials. Its effects in ovarian cancer (OC) are completely unexplored.

METHODS

We analyzed OPRM1-mRNA expression in six cisplatin-sensitive, two cisplatin-resistant OC cell-lines, 170 OC tissue samples and 12 non-neoplastic control tissues. Pro-angiogenetic, cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of D,L-methadone were evaluated in OC cell-lines and four patient-derived tumor-spheroid models.

RESULTS

OPRM1 was transcriptionally expressed in 69% of OC-tissues and in three of eight OC cell-lines. D,L-methadone exposure significantly reduced cell-viability in five OC cell-lines irrespective of OPRM1 expression. D,L-methadone, applied alone or combined with cisplatin, showed no significant effects on apoptosis or VEGF secretion in cell-lines. Notably, in two of the four spheroid models, treatment with D,L-methadone significantly enhanced cell growth (by up to 121%), especially after long-term exposure. This is consistent with the observed attenuation of the inhibitory effects of cisplatin in three spheroid models when adding D,L-methadone. The effect of methadone treatment on VEGF secretion in tumor-spheroids was inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that certain OC samples express OPRM1, which, however, is not a prerequisite for D,L-methadone function. As such, D,L-methadone may exert also detrimental effects by stimulating the growth of certain OC-cells and abrogating cisplatin's therapeutic effect.

MethylSPWNet and MethylCapsNet: Biologically Motivated Organization of DNAm Neural Networks, Inspired by Capsule Networks

DNA methylation (DNAm) alterations have been heavily implicated in carcinogenesis and the pathophysiology of diseases through upstream regulation of gene expression. DNAm deep-learning approaches are able to capture features associated with aging, cell type, and disease progression, but lack incorporation of prior biological knowledge. Here, we present modular, user-friendly deep-learning methodology and software, MethylCapsNet and MethylSPWNet, that group CpGs into biologically relevant capsules-such as gene promoter context, CpG island relationship, or user-defined groupings-and relate them to diagnostic and prognostic outcomes. We demonstrate these models' utility on 3,897 individuals in the classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. MethylCapsNet and MethylSPWNet provide an opportunity to increase DNAm deep-learning analyses' interpretability by enabling a flexible organization of DNAm data into biologically relevant capsules.

Targeting the mu-Opioid Receptor for Cancer Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Opioids are still the most effective and widely used treatments for acute and chronic pain in cancer patients. This review focuses on the impact of opioids and mu-opioid receptors (MOR) on tumor progression and providing new ideas for targeting the MOR in cancer treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies estimated that opioids facilitate tumor progression and are related to the worse prognosis in cancer patients. As the primary receptor of opioids, MOR is involved in the regulation of malignant transformation of tumors and participating in proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. MOR may be a new molecular marker of malignant tumors and thus become a new target for cancer therapy, which may be beneficial to the outcomes of cancer patients.

Preclinical and clinical studies into the bioactivity of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) for oncotherapy

Naltrexone (NTX) is a nonspecific opioid antagonist that exerts pharmacological effects on the opioid axis by blocking opioid receptors distributed in cytoplastic and nuclear regions. NTX has been used in opioid use disorder (OUD), immune-associated diseases, alcoholism, obesity, and chronic pain for decades. However, low-dose naltrexone (LDN) also exhibits remarkable inhibition of DNA synthesis, viability, and other functions in numerous cancers and is involved in immune remodeling against tumor invasion and chemical toxicity. The potential anticancer activity of LDN is a focus of basic research. Herein, we summarize the associated studies on LDN oncotherapy to highlight the potential mechanisms and prospective clinical applications.

Methadone-mediated sensitization of glioblastoma cells is drug and cell line dependent

PURPOSE

D,L-methadone (MET), an analgesic drug used for pain treatment and opiate addiction, has achieved attention from oncologists and social media as possible chemoensitizing agent in cancer therapy, notably brain cancer (glioblastoma multiforme, GBM). MET has been reported to enhance doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity in GBM cells via activation of the µ-opioid receptor (MOR). Here, we extended this work and quantified the toxic effect of MET in comparison to other opioids alone and in combination with doxorubicin and the clinically more relevant alkylating drug temozolomide (TMZ), using a set of GBM cell lines and primary GBM cells.

METHODS

MOR expression in GBM cells was investigated by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting. Resistance to drugs alone and in combination with anticancer drugs was assessed by MTT assays. Concentration effect curves were fitted by nonlinear regression analysis and IC50 values were calculated. Apoptosis and necrosis rates were determined by annexin V/propidium iodide (PI)-flow cytometry.

RESULTS

MET alone was cytotoxic in all GBM cell lines and primary GBM cells at high micromolar concentrations (IC50 ~ 60-130 µM), observed both in the metabolic MTT assay and by quantifying apoptosis and necrosis, while morphine and oxycodone were not cytotoxic in this concentration range. Naloxone was not able to block MET-induced cytotoxicity, indicating that cell death-inducing effects of MET are not MOR-dependent. We recorded doxorubicin and TMZ concentration- response curves in combination with fixed MET concentrations. MET enhanced doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity in only one cell line, and in primary cells it was observed only in a particular MET concentration range. In all assays, MET was not effective in sensitizing cells to TMZ. In two cell lines, MET even decreased the cell's sensitivity to TMZ.

CONCLUSION

MET was found to be cytotoxic in GBM cells in vitro only at high, clinically not relevant concentrations, where it was effective in inducing apoptosis and necrosis. Sensitizing effects were only observed in combination with doxorubicin, but not with TMZ, and are dependent on cell line and the applied drug concentration. Therefore, our findings do not support the use of MET in the treatment of GBM in combination with TMZ, as no sensitizing effect of MET was observed.

Anaesthesia as an influence in tumour progression

Purpose

Tumour growth and the formation of metastases are essential elements in the progression of cancer. The centre of treatment is the surgical resection of primary solid tumours. But even if the tumour can be removed without microscopic residual cells, local recurrences and distant metastases occur and determine the patient’s fate. During the operation, tumour cells are shed from the primary tumour and released into the circulation. These circulating tumour cells might play an important role in the formation of new tumour sites. Therefore, a functional innate and adaptive immune system is essential, especially in this perioperative period. Anaesthesia influences consciousness and pain perception and interacts directly with the immune system and tumour cells.

Methods

Review of the current literature concerning intra- and postoperative anaesthetic decisions and tumour progression.

Results

There are beneficial aspects for patient survival associated with total intravenous anaesthesia, the use of regional anaesthetics and the avoidance of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions. Alternatives such as irradiated intraoperative blood salvage and preoperative iron supplementation may be advantageous in cases where transfusions are limited or not wanted. The immunosuppressive properties of opioids are theoretical, but strong evidence to avoid them does not exist. The application of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis do not impair the patient’s survival and may even have a positive effect on tumour regression.

Conclusion

Anaesthesia does play an important part in the perioperative period in order to improve the cancer-related outcome. Further research is necessary to make more concrete recommendations.

D,L-Methadone causes leukemic cell apoptosis via an OPRM1-triggered increase in IP3R-mediated ER Ca2+ release and decrease in Ca2+ efflux, elevating [Ca2+]i

The search continues for improved therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (aLL), the most common malignancy in children. Recently, d,l-methadone was put forth as sensitizer for aLL chemotherapy. However, the specific target of d,l-methadone in leukemic cells and the mechanism by which it induces leukemic cell apoptosis remain to be defined. Here, we demonstrate that d,l-methadone induces leukemic cell apoptosis through activation of the mu1 subtype of opioid receptors (OPRM1). d,l-Methadone evokes IP3R-mediated ER Ca²⁺ release that is inhibited by OPRM1 loss. In addition, the rate of Ca²⁺ extrusion following d,l-methadone treatment is reduced, but is accelerated by loss of OPRM1. These d,l-methadone effects cause a lethal rise in [Ca²⁺]_i that is again inhibited by OPRM1 loss, which then prevents d,l-methadone-induced apoptosis that is associated with activation of calpain-1, truncation of Bid, cytochrome C release, and proteolysis of caspase-3/12. Chelating intracellular Ca²⁺ with BAPTA-AM reverses d,l-methadone-induced apoptosis, establishing a link between the rise in [Ca²⁺]_i and d,l-methadone-induced apoptosis. Altogether, our findings point to OPRM1 as a specific target of d,l-methadone in leukemic cells, and that OPRM1 activation by d,l-methadone disrupts IP3R-mediated ER Ca²⁺ release and rate of Ca²⁺ efflux, causing a rise in [Ca²⁺]_i that upregulates the calpain-1-Bid-cytochrome C-caspase-3/12 apoptotic pathway.

Cancer, the Media and Dealing with Knowledge

Among the primary function of the media are conveying personal understanding and expanding the subjective knowledge of the recipient citizen. A particular challenge arising during this process is the mediation of medical knowledge. In addition to pure factual knowledge, it often involves subjective experiences, hopes and wishes. One example of this is media reports about cancer therapies. As a result of widespread media coverage since 2017, the public is under the impression that methadone is a promising treatment for cancer. This chapter analyzes the part played by the media and the ethical debate. The ethical issues that arise concern good scientific practice, patient autonomy and the media coverage of methadone. We conclude that, according to the current state of research, the promotion of methadone as a cure for cancer is ethically unacceptable. In this case the media are not fulfilling their task of imparting knowledge, because they are not communicating the current state of research or the associated ethical questions.

Randomized Controlled Immunotherapy Clinical Trials for GBM Challenged

Simple Summary

Although multiple meta-analyses on active specific immunotherapy treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) have demonstrated a significant prolongation of overall survival, no single research group has succeeded in demonstrating the efficacy of this type of treatment in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. In this paper, we explain how the complexity of the tumor biology and tumor–host interactions make proper stratification of a control group impossible. The individualized characteristics of advanced therapy medicinal products for immunotherapy contribute to heterogeneity within an experimental group. The dynamics of each tumor and in each patient aggravate comparative stable patient groups. Finally, combinations of immunotherapy strategies should be integrated with first-line treatment. We illustrate the complexity of a combined first-line treatment with individualized multimodal immunotherapy in a group of 70 adults with GBM and demonstrate that the integration of immunogenic cell death treatment within maintenance chemotherapy followed by dendritic cell vaccines and maintenance immunotherapy might provide a step towards improving the overall survival rate of GBM patients.

Abstract

Immunotherapies represent a promising strategy for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treatment. Different immunotherapies include the use of checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, and vaccines such as dendritic cell vaccines. Antibodies have also been used as toxin or radioactive particle delivery vehicles to eliminate target cells in the treatment of GBM. Oncolytic viral therapy and other immunogenic cell death-inducing treatments bridge the antitumor strategy with immunization and installation of immune control over the disease. These strategies should be included in the standard treatment protocol for GBM. Some immunotherapies are individualized in terms of the medicinal product, the immune target, and the immune tumor–host contact. Current individualized immunotherapy strategies focus on combinations of approaches. Standardization appears to be impossible in the face of complex controlled trial designs. To define appropriate control groups, stratification according to the Recursive Partitioning Analysis classification, MGMT promotor methylation, epigenetic GBM sub-typing, tumor microenvironment, systemic immune functioning before and after radiochemotherapy, and the need for/type of symptom-relieving drugs is required. Moreover, maintenance of a fixed treatment protocol for a dynamic, deadly cancer disease in a permanently changing tumor–host immune context might be inappropriate. This complexity is illustrated using our own data on individualized multimodal immunotherapies for GBM. Individualized medicines, including multimodal immunotherapies, are a rational and optimal yet also flexible approach to induce long-term tumor control. However, innovative methods are needed to assess the efficacy of complex individualized treatments and implement them more quickly into the general health system.

Impact of anesthesia and analgesia techniques on glioblastoma progression. A narrative review

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive malignant CNS tumor with a median survival of 15 months after diagnosis. Standard therapy for GBM includes surgical resection, radiation, and temozolomide. Recently, anesthetics and analgesics have received attention for their potential involvement in mediating tumor growth. This narrative review investigated whether various members of the 2 aforementioned classes of drugs have a definitive impact on GBM progression by summarizing pertinent in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies. Recent publications regarding general anesthetics have been inconsistent, showing that they can be pro-tumoral or antitumoral depending on the experimental context. The local anesthetic lidocaine has shown consistent antitumoral effects in vitro. Clinical studies looking at anesthetics have not concluded that their use improves patient outcomes. In vitro and in vivo studies looking at opioid involvement in GBM have demonstrated inconsistent findings regarding whether these drugs are pro-tumoral or antitumoral. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and specifically COX-2 inhibitors, have shown inconsistent findings across multiple studies looking at whether they are beneficial in halting GBM progression. Until multiple repeatable studies show that anesthetics and analgesics can suppress GBM growth, there is no strong evidence to recommend changes in the anesthetic care of these patients.

Cytotoxic and Senolytic Effects of Methadone in Combination with Temozolomide in Glioblastoma Cells

Methadone is an analgesic drug used for pain treatment and heroin substitution. Recently, methadone has been proposed to be useful also for cancer therapy, including glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most severe form of brain cancer, because experiments on cultured glioma cells treated with doxorubicin showed promising results. Doxorubicin, however, is not used first-line in GBM therapy. Therefore, we analyzed the cytotoxic effect of methadone alone and in combination with temozolomide, a DNA-alkylating drug that is first-line used in GBM treatment, utilizing GBM-derived cell lines and a human fibroblast cell line. We show that methadone is cytotoxic on its own, inducing apoptosis and necrosis, which was observed at a concentration above 20 µg/mL. Methadone was similar toxic in isogenic MGMT expressing and non-expressing cells, and in LN229 glioblastoma and VH10T human fibroblasts. The apoptosis-inducing activity of methadone is not bound on the opioid receptor (OR), since naloxone, a competitive inhibitor of OR, did not attenuate methadone-induced apoptosis/necrosis. Administrating methadone and temozolomide together, temozolomide had no impact on methadone-induced apoptosis (which occurred 3 days after treatment), while temozolomide-induced apoptosis (which occurred 5 days after treatment) was unaffected at low (non-toxic) methadone concentration (5 µg/mL), and at high (toxic) methadone concentration (20 µg/mL) the cytotoxic effects of methadone and temozolomide were additive. Methadone is not genotoxic, as revealed by comet and γH2AX assay, and did not ameliorate the genotoxic effect of temozolomide. Further, methadone did not induce cellular senescence and had no effect on temozolomide-induced senescence. Although methadone was toxic on senescent cells, it cannot be considered a senolytic drug since cytotoxicity was not specific for senescent cells. Finally, we show that methadone had no impact on the MGMT promoter methylation. Overall, the data show that methadone on glioblastoma cells in vitro is cytotoxic and induces apoptosis/necrosis at doses that are above the level that can be achieved in vivo. It is not genotoxic, and does not ameliorate the cell killing or the senescence-inducing effect of temozolomide (no synergistic effect), indicating it has no impact on temozolomide-induced signaling pathways. The data do not support the notion that concomitant methadone treatment supports temozolomide-based chemotherapy.

Against Repurposing Methadone for Glioblastoma Therapy

Methadone, which is used as maintenance medication for outpatient treatment of opioid dependence or as an analgesic drug, has been suggested by preclinical in vitro and mouse studies to induce cell death and sensitivity to chemo- or radiotherapy in leukemia, glioblastoma, and carcinoma cells. These data together with episodical public reports on long-term surviving cancer patients who use methadone led to a hype of methadone as an anti-cancer drug in social and public media. However, clinical evidence for a tumoricidal effect of methadone is missing and prospective clinical trials, except in colorectal cancer, are not envisaged because of the limited preclinical data available. The present article reviews the pharmacokinetics, potential molecular targets, as well as the evidence for a tumoricidal effect of methadone in view of the therapeutically achievable doses in the brain. Moreover, it provides original in vitro data showing that methadone at clinically relevant concentrations fails to impair clonogenicity or radioresistance of glioblastoma cells.

Methadone does not potentiate the effect of doxorubicin in canine tumour cell lines

Opioid receptor activation was shown to enhance the efficacy of anti‐neoplastic drugs in several human cancer cell lines. In these cell lines, doxorubicin increased the number of opioid receptors and methadone concurrently enhanced cellular doxorubicin uptake. Triggered through lay press and media, animal owners started to challenge veterinary oncologists with questions about methadone use in anti‐cancer therapy. Especially in veterinary medicine, where side effects of chemotherapy are tolerated to a lesser extent and hence smaller doses are given, agents potentiating chemotherapeutic agents would be an optimal approach to treatment. Canine transitional cell carcinoma cells (TCC, K9TCC), canine osteosarcoma cells (OSA, Abrams) and canine hemangiosarcoma cells (HSA, DAL‐4) were incubated with different combinations of methadone, buprenorphine and doxorubicin, in order to test inhibition of cell proliferation. Opioid receptor density was assessed with fluorescence‐activated cell sorting in drug native and doxorubicin pretreated cells. In TCC and OSA cell lines opioid receptor density increased after doxorubicin pretreatment. In combination treatment, however, we did not find significant potentiation of doxorubicin's inhibitory effect on proliferation in these cell lines. Neither was there a significant increase of the effect of doxorubicin when the opioids were added 24 hr before doxorubicin. Hence, we could not confirm the hypothesis that opioids increase the anti‐proliferative effect of the anti‐neoplastic drug doxorubicin in any of these canine tumour cell lines. The lack of effect on a cellular level does not warrant a clinical approach to use opioids together with doxorubicin in dogs with cancer.

Receptor tyrosine kinase targeting in glioblastoma: performance, limitations and future approaches

From all central nervous system tumors, gliomas are the most common. Nowadays, researchers are looking for more efficient treatments for these tumors, as well as ways for early diagnosis. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are major targets for oncology and the development of small-molecule RTK inhibitors has been proven successful in cancer treatment. Mutations or aberrant activation of the RTKs and their intracellular signaling pathways are linked to several malignant diseases, including glioblastoma. The progress in the understanding of malignant glioma evolution has led to RTK targeted therapies with high capacity to improve the therapeutic response while reducing toxicity. In this review, we present the most important RTKs (i.e. EGFR, IGFR, PDGFR and VEGFR) currently used for developing cancer therapeutics together with the potential of RTK-related drugs in glioblastoma treatment. Also, we focus on some therapeutic agents that are currently at different stages of research or even in clinical phases and proved to be suitable as re-purposing candidates for glioblastoma treatment.

Safety aspects of opioid-naïve patients with high-grade glioma treated with D,L-Methadone: an observational case series

It was suggested that D, L-Methadone might improve the clinical course of glioma patients. Owing to massive press coverage, patients demand the prescription of D, L-Methadone, but regarding its adjunctive use in glioma therapy there is no standard medication plan. Furthermore, it is not known which side effects the administration of D, L-Methadone might harbor, especially if the patients are opioid-naïve and if D, L-Methadone therapy was managed by the patients themselves or their general practitioners. Opioid-naïve patients with high-grade glioma (new diagnosis or recurrent) receiving D, L-Methadone were included in this retrospective observational analysis. Side effects were assigned if the condition deteriorated in conjunction with the initiation of D, L-Methadone and resolved/ ameliorated after cessation of the intake/reduction of the dosage. Side effects were categorized according to the common toxicity criteria (CTC). Twenty-four patients were included. All patients were opioid-naïve and received D, L-Methadone from their general practitioners. Sixteen patients experienced side effects. The median dosage when side effects began to occur was 15.8 mg/ 24 h. Fatigue and mood changes were reported most frequently (14 of 24 patients). Five patients had severe side effects related to relatively high doses. In all cases, symptoms resolved after cessation or dose reduction. Our results show that D/L M intake lead to frequent occurrence of side effects in opioid-naïve patients especially when not handled with caution and close supervision. Patients, their relatives, their GPs and neuro-oncologists need to be informed about the broad spectrum of side effects in order to thoroughly counsel glioma patients.

MOP-dependent enhancement of methadone on the effectiveness of ALA-PDT for A172 cells by upregulating phosphorylated JNK and BCL2

BACKGROUND

Methadone, as a long-acting opioid analgesic, shows an ability to sensitize the treatment of ALA-PDT for glioblastoma cells (A172) in vitro by promoting apoptosis. However, the mechanisms how methadone enhances the effectiveness of ALA-PDT for tumor cells remains to be clarified.

METHODS

The expression of mu opioid receptor (MOP), apoptosis, phosphorylated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and phosphorylated apoptosis regulator B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) were measured by flow cytometry. Cytotoxicity was determined using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8). A MOP antagonist, naloxone, was used to evaluate the role of MOP in the above process.

RESULTS

It was found that A172 cells show the expression of MOP and that naloxone inhibits the enhancement of the methadone effect on apoptosis following ALA-PDT (p < 0.05). Phosphorylated JNK and BCL2 induced by ALA-PDT were promoted in the presence of methadone (p < 0.05). These methadone effects were also inhibited by naloxone (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that apoptosis induced by ALA-PDT is enhanced by methadone, mostly MOP-mediated, through the upregulation of accumulation of phosphorylated JNK and BCL2, leading to a promotion of cytotoxicity of ALA-PDT for A172 cells.

Euxanthone represses the proliferation, migration, and invasion of glioblastoma cells by modulating STAT3/SHP-1 signaling

Glioblastoma is one of the most prevalent primary malignant brain tumors. Glioblastoma often develops resistance to conventional chemoradiotherapy, and thus, new ways to treat glioblastoma are urgently required. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of euxanthone on the anticancer activities of glioblastoma and its potential mechanism. The U87 and U251 glioblastoma cell lines were cultured in media containing different concentrations of euxanthone. CCK-8 and colony formation assay were used to evaluate the cell proliferation. Cell migration and invasion were evaluated by wound healing and Transwell assays. Flow cytometry was used to assess the cell cycle and apoptosis rate. TUNEL assay was also employed to evaluate the apoptosis rate. Gene and protein expressions were determined by RT-qPCR and western blotting, respectively. A xenograft model was established to evaluate the efficacy of euxanthone in vivo. Euxanthone significantly repressed cell viability, migration, invasion, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of U87 and U251 cells; and increased the rate of apoptosis. Western blotting results revealed that the levels of p21, p27, cleaved caspase-3, Bax, TIMP-3, and E-cadherin were upregulated while, the levels of CDK4, CDK6, pro-caspase-3, Bcl-2, MMP-2, MMP-9, N-cadherin, and Vimentin were downregulated by euxanthone. In addition, the expression of p-STAT3 was decreased, while the expression of SHP-1 was upregulated by euxanthone. We proposed that euxanthone could repress the malignant behavior of glioblastoma cells through suppression of STAT3 phosphorylation and activation of SHP-1. Further, in vivo data demonstrated that euxanthone repressed tumor growth and promoted apoptosis.

Impact of Anesthetics, Analgesics, and Perioperative Blood Transfusion in Pediatric Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Cancer is the leading cause of death by disease in developed countries. Children and adolescents with cancer need surgical interventions (ie, biopsy or major surgery) to diagnose, treat, or palliate their malignancies. Surgery is a period of high vulnerability because it stimulates the release of inflammatory mediators, catecholamines, and angiogenesis activators, which coincides with a period of immunosuppression. Thus, during and after surgery, dormant tumors or micrometastasis (ie, minimal residual disease) can grow and become clinically relevant metastasis. Anesthetics (ie, volatile agents, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine) and analgesics (ie, opioids) may also contribute to the growth of minimal residual disease or disease progression. For instance, volatile anesthetics have been implicated in immunosuppression and direct stimulation of cancer cell survival and proliferation. Contrarily, propofol has shown in vitro anticancer effects. In addition, perioperative blood transfusions are not uncommon in children undergoing cancer surgery. In adults, an association between perioperative blood transfusions and cancer progression has been described for some malignancies. Transfusion-related immunomodulation is one of the mechanisms by which blood transfusions can promote cancer progression. Other mechanisms include inflammation and the infusion of growth factors. In the present review, we discuss different aspects of tumorigenesis, metastasis, angiogenesis, the immune system, and the current studies about the impact of anesthetics, analgesics, and perioperative blood transfusions on pediatric cancer progression.

Current state and future perspective of drug repurposing in malignant glioma

Malignant gliomas are still extremely difficult to treat because complete surgical resection is biologically not feasible due to the invasive nature of these diseases and the proximity of tumors to functionally sensitive areas. Moreover, adjuvant therapies are facing a strong therapeutic resistance since the central nervous system is a highly protected environment and the tumor cells display a vast intra-tumoral genetic and epigenetic variation. As a consequence, new therapeutics are urgently needed but the process of developing novel compounds that finally reach clinical application is highly time-consuming and expensive. Drug repurposing is an approach to facilitate and accelerate the discovery of new cancer treatments. In malignant glioma, like in other cancers, pre-existing physiological pathways that regulate cell growth, cell death or cell migration are dysregulated causing malignant transformation. A wide variety of drugs are clinically used to treat non-cancerous diseases interfering with these malignancy-associated pathways. Repurposed drugs have key advantages: They already have approval for clinical use by national regulatory authorities. Moreover, they are for the most part inexpensive and their side effect and safety profiles are well characterized. In this work, we provide an overview on current repurposing strategies for the treatment of malignant glioma.

Methadone enhances the effectiveness of 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy for squamous cell carcinoma and glioblastoma in vitro

Although having shown promising clinical outcomes, the effectiveness of 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and glioblastoma remains to be improved. The analgesic drug methadone is able to sensitize various tumors to chemotherapy. In this in vitro study, the influence of methadone to the effectiveness of ALA-PDT for SCC (FADU) and glioblastoma (A172) was investigated on the protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) fluorescence, survival rates, apoptosis, and cell cycle phase, each with or without the presence of methadone. The production of PpIX was increased by methadone in FADU cells while it was decreased in A172 cells. The survival rates of both cell lines treated by ALA-PDT were significantly reduced by the combination with methadone (P < .05). Methadone also significantly increased the percentage of apoptotic cells and improved the effect of ALA-PDT on the cell cycle phase arrest in the G0/G1 phase (P < .05). This study demonstrates the potential of methadone to influence the cytotoxic effect of ALA-PDT for both SCC and glioblastoma cell lines.

Inhibitory role of Gi-coupled receptors on cAMP-driven cancers with focus on opioid receptors in lung adenocarcinoma and its stem cells

The development, progression, metastasis and drug resistance of the most common human cancers are driven by cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-signaling downstream of beta-adrenergic receptors (β-Ars) coupled to the stimulatory G-protein G_s. Receptors coupled to the inhibitory G-protein G_i inhibit this signaling cascade by blocking the activation of the enzyme adenylyl cyclase that catalyzes the formation of cAMP and function as the physiological inhibitors of this signaling cascade. Members of the G_i-coupled receptor family widely expressed in the mammalian organism are GABA B receptors (GABA_B-Rs) for the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), opioid receptors for endogenous opioid peptides and cannabinoid receptors for endogenous cannabinoids. This review summarizes current evidence for the concept that the activation of G_i-receptor signaling by pharmacological and psychological means is a promising tool for the long-term management of cAMP-driven cancers with special emphasis on the inhibitory effects of opioids on lung adenocarcinoma and its stem cells.

Methadone-Not a magic bullet in melanoma therapy

Methadone (Met) mainly acts as a μ-opioid receptor agonist. Recent evidence pointing towards the role of Met in sensitization of certain cancer cell lines to chemotherapeutic agents has promoted the hypothesis that Met may be a useful adjuvant to cancer chemotherapy. We wanted to address whether Met has, alone or in combination with a chemotherapeutic agent, an effect on melanoma cell viability in vitro. Only a small fraction (4.3%) of our 102 melanoma biobank cell lines with RNA-sequencing data showed expression of the main receptor for Met (OPRM1). We assessed the viability of melanoma cell lines with high, medium or low/no OPRM1 expression (OPRM1^high , OPRM1^med , OPRM1^neg ) 72 hours after treatment with Met alone or combined with cisplatin (Cis). Our analyses show that Met alone did not affect cell viability. While Cis/Met treatment did not have an effect on viability of OPRM1^med or OPRM1^neg cell lines, it resulted in a slightly decreased cell viability of OPRM1^high cells. Clinically, concurrent temozolomide/Met treatment did not have an effect in our single-case report of a patient suffering from uveal melanoma. Taken together, our findings do not provide evidence for recommending Met as an adjuvant to chemotherapy in patients with melanoma.

D,L-Methadone does not improve radio- and chemotherapy in glioblastoma in vitro

PURPOSE

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant tumor of the central nervous system. Median survival of glioblastoma patients under standard therapy including radiotherapy and chemotherapy using temozolomide (TMZ) is 14.6 months. As cell culture experiments combining D,L-methadone with doxorubicin demonstrated an increased reduction of cell viability of glioblastoma cells, the opioid has been discussed as a drug for the treatment of GBM. Despite lack of clinical and experimental evidence that D,L-methadone in combination with standard therapy will be beneficial, an increasing number of tumor patients medicating themselves with D,L-methadone present to the hospitals in Germany.

METHODS

As a first step towards understanding whether D,L-methadone may increase the efficacy of standard therapy, we used a cell culture model of primary GBM and fibroblast cell cultures derived from GBM patients. The cultures were treated with different concentrations of D,L-methadone in combination with X-irradiation, TMZ or both. Cell viability was determined by measuring ATP in cell lysates and dehydrogenase activity in living cells.

RESULTS

When only treated with D,L-methadone, 1 µM of the opioid was sufficient to reduce viability of fibroblasts, whereas 10 µM was needed to significantly reduce glioblastoma cell viability. In addition, D,L-methadone did not improve the anti-neoplastic effects of X-irradiation, temozolomide or both.

CONCLUSIONS

As D,L-methadone reduces glioblastoma cell viability only when concentrations are used that had been reported to be toxic to patients and as there were no interactions observable combining it with standard therapy, a recommendation for the use of D,L-methadone in glioblastoma therapy cannot be given.

The Neuro-Psychological Axis of Smoking-Associated Cancer

This mini-review summarizes current knowledge on similarities and synergism between smoking and psychological stress-induced modulations of growth stimulating and inhibiting regulatory networks in epithelial cells and epithelial cancers with emphasis on cancer stimulating neurotransmitters and their receptors as well as cancer inhibiting γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and opioids. Hyperactive cAMP signaling downstream of beta-adrenergic receptors (β-ARs) has been identified as the driving force of most smoking-associated cancers by numerous preclinical studies and psychological stress intensifies these effects while experimental stress reduction inhibits. The integration of cAMP reduction via stress reduction by pharmacological and psychological means such as psychotherapy, relaxation meditation and yoga into any cancer treatment strategy is recommended.

In vitro evaluation of effects of metformin on morphine and methadone tolerance through mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway

The chronic use of opioids leads to tolerance, psychological, and physical dependence that limits their use as an effective long-term pain control. Several studies have shown that mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) plays a crucial role in the development of opioid tolerance. Metformin activates 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) which directly suppresses the mTOR complex 1 signaling pathway. On the other hand, metformin can also inhibit mTOR directly and in an AMPK-independent manner. Thus, in the current study, we aimed to investigate the effects of metformin on the development of morphine and/or methadone-induced tolerance in human glioblastoma (T98G) cell line. We examined the effects of chronic treatment of morphine and/or methadone in the presence or absence of metformin with or without AMPK inhibitor (dorsomorphin hydrochloride) on levels of nitric oxide and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), phosphorylated and dephosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 kinase β-1 (S6K1) and 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) in T98G cells. Pretreatment of cells with metformin (40 µM) with or without AMPK inhibitor (dorsomorphin hydrochloride; 1 µM) before adding of morphine (2.5 µM) or methadone (1 µM) revealed a protective effects on the development of opioid tolerance. Prior administration of metformin reversed the elevation of nitric oxide levels induced by morphine (p < 0.001) and methadone (p < 0.001) and also prevented the raise of cAMP levels induced by morphine in T98G cells (p < 0.05). Contribution of mTOR signaling pathway in metformin-induced effect was shown by the inhibition of phosphorylation of S6K1 and 4E-BP1, the downstream targets of mTOR. mTOR activation suppresses opioid-induced antinociception, and its activity has also been increased during opioid tolerance.

Overexpression of HOXC10 promotes glioblastoma cell progression to a poor prognosis via the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway

OBJECTIVE

The HOX gene is expressed in neoplasias occurred in multiple tissues, such as the colon, lung and breast. However, the effects of the HOX gene on glioblastoma (GBM) remain poorly understood. We examined HOXC10 expression in GBM tissues and cells, analysed its effect on GBM prognosis, and finally assessed its possible underlying mechanisms in this study.

METHODS

HOXC10 expression levels and its prognostic effects on GBM tissues were analysed based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and ONCOMINE database. Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. Then, the expression of HOXC10 was detected in four GBM cell lines using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). In addition, small interfering RNA (si-RNA) was utilised in the U87 cell line with the highest HOXC10 expression to facilitate subsequent in vitro cell experiment. Cell proliferation, migration and invasion were assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and colony formation assay, wound healing, Transwell assay, respectively in GBM U87 cell after HOXC10 knockdown. Key proteins related to the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) signalling pathway were measured by western blotting.

RESULTS

HOXC10 expression was significantly increased in GBM tissues and cell lines, leading a poor OS in GBM patients. Knockdown of HOXC10 could inhibit the GBM U87 cells proliferation, migration and invasion, as well as decreased expression levels of key proteins in PI3K/AKT signalling pathway.

CONCLUSION

HOXC10 was overexpressed in GBM tissues and cells, and associated with poor prognosis in GBM patients. Moreover, HOXC10 knockdown inhibited U87 cell proliferation, migration and invasion, which were potentially related to PI3K/AKT signalling pathway activation. Our findings revealed that HOXC10 represent a promising biological target for GBM treatment in the future.

Efficacy of D,L-methadone in the treatment of glioblastoma in vitro

AIM

Recently, D,L-methadone has been put forward as adjuvant treatment in glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

We analyzed the μ-opioid receptor expression in a set of GBM cell lines and investigated the efficacy of D,L-methadone alone and in combination with temozolomide (TMZ). Results & conclusion: Expression of the μ-opioid receptor was similar in the tested cell lines. High concentrations of D,L-methadone induced apoptosis in all cell lines and showed treatment interaction with TMZ. However, in lower dosages, reflecting clinically attainable concentrations, D,L-methadone alone showed no efficacy, and induced even higher proliferation in one specific cell line. Also, no interaction with TMZ was observed. These results suggest caution to the premature use of D,L-methadone in the treatment of GBM patients.

Methadone against cancer: Lost in translation

Recently, the opioid analgesic d,l-methadone has gained much attention as a potential antineoplastic compound, considerably triggered through lay press and media. In consequence, physicians and pharmacists are currently confronted with numerous patients willing to use d,l-methadone against their malignancies. Well-performed in vitro and in vivo models have in fact shown pro-apoptotic effects of d,l-methadone or other opioids, but also proliferation-stimulating properties. Moreover, the mechanisms of proposed opioid-stimulated apoptosis are incompletely described or contradicting. Finally, the receptors mostly responsible for induction of apoptosis by d,l-methadone remain unclear as contributions of both µ-opioid receptors, Fas cell death receptors, toll-like receptors, N-Methyl-d-aspartate receptors and opioid growth factor receptors were suggested. Such ambiguity prevents rational application of d,l-methadone or patient stratification to enhance beneficial antineoplastic effects. From a clinical point of view, d,l-methadone and other opioids might in fact prolong survival, but such effects likely originate from their analgesic and neuro-psychotropic properties and, thus, improvements of quality of life. Crucial obstacles to the administration of d,l-methadone are incomplete knowledge about its systemic disposition, highly variable pharmacokinetics, profound drug-drug- or drug-disease interaction and QT-prolongation potential. This article summarizes and rates the pharmacological basis of d,l-methadone as an antineoplastic agent and puts its administration in clinical oncology into perspective. Despite enthralling experimental findings about d,l-methadone-mediated apoptosis in cancerous cells or tissues, clinicians should realize the current lack of evidence for the use of d,l-methadone as an antineoplastic agent. Its administration against cancer pain is, however, tenable, albeit restricted to certain clinical situations.