1
|
Amarsanaa E, Wie M, Shin U, Bilal N, Hwang J, Lee E, Lee S, Kim BG, Kim S, Lee Y, Myung K. Synergistic enhancement of PARP inhibition via small molecule UNI66-mediated suppression of BRD4-dependent transcription of RAD51 and CtIP. NAR Cancer 2025; 7:zcaf013. [PMID: 40308947 PMCID: PMC12041917 DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcaf013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2024] [Revised: 02/18/2025] [Accepted: 03/26/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025] Open
Abstract
Targeted therapy leveraging synthetic lethality in homologous recombination (HR)-defective tumors, particularly in BRCA-mutated tumors through poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-dependent repair inhibition, has shown success. However, the challenge lies in the ability of the tumors to reactivate HR via diverse mechanisms, leading to resistance against PARP-dependent repair inhibition. Addressing this issue, the down-regulation of HR activity has been explored as a potential strategy to overcome PARP inhibitor-resistant tumors. Yet, the intricate modulation of HR gene expression in mammalian cells is still not fully understood. In this study, we used a small molecule, UNI66, identified from high-throughput screening, to investigate regulatory mechanisms of HR. UNI66 was observed to induce synthetic lethality in PARP1-deficient cells and enhanced the sensitivity of multiple cancer cells to PARP inhibitors, suggesting a role in HR down-regulation. Mechanistically, UNI66 was found to interact with and inhibit BRD4 protein binding to the promoters of CtIP and RAD51 genes, resulting in the down-regulation of their transcription. This decrease in CtIP and RAD51 expression was associated with reduced HR activity, thereby increasing the sensitivity of tumors to PARP inhibitors. These findings indicate that BRD4-mediated transcriptional regulation of CtIP and RAD51 influences HR activity, which may have implications for overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enkhzul Amarsanaa
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biological Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Minwoo Wie
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biological Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Unbeom Shin
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Nabeela Bilal
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Jungme Hwang
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun A Lee
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Seon Young Lee
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung-Gyu Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Shinseog Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoonsung Lee
- Clinical Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyungjae Myung
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng F, Yao NY, Georgescu RE, Li H, O’Donnell ME. Structure of the PCNA unloader Elg1-RFC. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadl1739. [PMID: 38427736 PMCID: PMC10906927 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl1739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
During DNA replication, the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) clamps are loaded onto primed sites for each Okazaki fragment synthesis by the AAA+ heteropentamer replication factor C (RFC). PCNA encircling duplex DNA is quite stable and is removed from DNA by the dedicated clamp unloader Elg1-RFC. Here, we show the cryo-EM structure of Elg1-RFC in various states with PCNA. The structures reveal essential features of Elg1-RFC that explain how it is dedicated to PCNA unloading. Specifically, Elg1 contains two external loops that block opening of the Elg1-RFC complex for DNA binding, and an "Elg1 plug" domain that fills the central DNA binding chamber, thereby reinforcing the exclusive PCNA unloading activity of Elg1-RFC. Elg1-RFC was capable of unloading PCNA using non-hydrolyzable AMP-PNP. Both RFC and Elg1-RFC could remove PCNA from covalently closed circular DNA, indicating that PCNA unloading occurs by a mechanism that is distinct from PCNA loading. Implications for the PCNA unloading mechanism are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengwei Zheng
- Department of Structural Biology, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Nina Y. Yao
- DNA Replication Laboratory and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, NY, New York, USA
| | - Roxana E. Georgescu
- DNA Replication Laboratory and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, NY, New York, USA
| | - Huilin Li
- Department of Structural Biology, Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Michael E. O’Donnell
- DNA Replication Laboratory and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, NY, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park SH, Kim N, Kang N, Ryu E, Lee EA, Ra JS, Gartner A, Kang S, Myung K, Lee KY. Short-range end resection requires ATAD5-mediated PCNA unloading for faithful homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:10519-10535. [PMID: 37739427 PMCID: PMC10602867 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination (HR) requires bidirectional end resection initiated by a nick formed close to a DNA double-strand break (DSB), dysregulation favoring error-prone DNA end-joining pathways. Here we investigate the role of the ATAD5, a PCNA unloading protein, in short-range end resection, long-range resection not being affected by ATAD5 deficiency. Rapid PCNA loading onto DNA at DSB sites depends on the RFC PCNA loader complex and MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 nuclease complexes bound to CtIP. Based on our cytological analyses and on an in vitro system for short-range end resection, we propose that PCNA unloading by ATAD5 is required for the completion of short-range resection. Hampering PCNA unloading also leads to failure to remove the KU70/80 complex from the termini of DSBs hindering DNA repair synthesis and the completion of HR. In line with this model, ATAD5-depleted cells are defective for HR, show increased sensitivity to camptothecin, a drug forming protein-DNA adducts, and an augmented dependency on end-joining pathways. Our study highlights the importance of PCNA regulation at DSB for proper end resection and HR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Hyung Park
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Information-Bio Convergence Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Korea
| | - Namwoo Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Korea
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Information-Bio Convergence Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Korea
| | - Nalae Kang
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Korea
| | - Eunjin Ryu
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Korea
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Information-Bio Convergence Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Korea
| | - Eun A Lee
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Korea
| | - Jae Sun Ra
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Korea
| | - Anton Gartner
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Korea
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Information-Bio Convergence Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Korea
| | - Sukhyun Kang
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Korea
| | - Kyungjae Myung
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Information-Bio Convergence Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Korea
| | - Kyoo-young Lee
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Korea
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wie M, Khim K, Groehler IV A, Heo S, Woo J, Son K, Lee E, Ra J, Hong S, Schärer O, Choi J, Myung K. Alkylation of nucleobases by 2-chloro- N,N-diethylethanamine hydrochloride (CDEAH) sensitizes PARP1-deficient tumors. NAR Cancer 2023; 5:zcad042. [PMID: 37554969 PMCID: PMC10405566 DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcad042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Targeting BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient tumors through synthetic lethality using poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) has emerged as a successful strategy for cancer therapy. PARPi monotherapy has shown excellent efficacy and safety profiles in clinical practice but is limited by the need for tumor genome mutations in BRCA or other homologous recombination genes as well as the rapid emergence of resistance. In this study, we identified 2-chloro-N,N-diethylethanamine hydrochloride (CDEAH) as a small molecule that selectively kills PARP1- and xeroderma pigmentosum A-deficient cells. CDEAH is a monofunctional alkylating agent that preferentially alkylates guanine nucleobases, forming DNA adducts that can be removed from DNA by either a PARP1-dependent base excision repair or nucleotide excision repair. Treatment of PARP1-deficient cells leads to the formation of strand breaks, an accumulation of cells in S phase and activation of the DNA damage response. Furthermore, CDEAH selectively inhibits PARP1-deficient xenograft tumor growth compared to isogenic PARP1-proficient tumors. Collectively, we report the discovery of an alkylating agent inducing DNA damage that requires PARP1 activity for repair and acts synergistically with PARPi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minwoo Wie
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biological Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Keon Woo Khim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biological Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Arnold S Groehler IV
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Soomin Heo
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Junhyeok Woo
- Department of Chemistry, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Kook Son
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun A Lee
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Sun Ra
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung You Hong
- Department of Chemistry, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Orlando D Schärer
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biological Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Jang Hyun Choi
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biological Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyungjae Myung
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang C, Chan DW, Hendrickson EA. Kinome-wide screening uncovers a role for Bromodomain Protein 3 in DNA double-stranded break repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 2023; 122:103445. [PMID: 36608404 PMCID: PMC10353298 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Double-stranded breaks (DSBs) are toxic DNA damage and a serious threat to genomic integrity. Thus, all living organisms have evolved multiple mechanisms of DNA DSB repair, the two principal ones being classical-non homologous end joining (C-NHEJ), and homology dependent recombination (HDR). In mammals, C-NHEJ is the predominate DSB repair pathway, but how a cell chooses to repair a particular DSB by a certain pathway is still not mechanistically clear. To uncover novel regulators of DSB repair pathway choice, we performed a kinome-wide screen in a human cell line engineered to express a dominant-negative C-NHEJ factor. The intellectual basis for such a screen was our hypothesis that a C-NHEJ-crippled cell line might need to upregulate other DSB repair pathways, including HDR, in order to survive. This screen identified Bromodomain-containing Protein 3 (BRD3) as a protein whose expression was almost completely ablated specifically in a C-NHEJ-defective cell line. Subsequent experimentation demonstrated that BRD3 is a negative regulator of HDR as BRD3-null cell lines proved to be hyper-recombinogenic for gene conversion, sister chromatid exchanges and gene targeting. Mechanistically, BRD3 appears to be working at the level of Radiation Sensitive 51 (RAD51) recruitment. Overall, our results demonstrate that BRD3 is a novel regulator of human DSB repair pathway choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Wang
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Doug W Chan
- Department of Systems Biology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Eric A Hendrickson
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Effects of Defective Unloading and Recycling of PCNA Revealed by the Analysis of ELG1 Mutants. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24021568. [PMID: 36675081 PMCID: PMC9863317 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Timely and complete replication of the genome is essential for life. The PCNA ring plays an essential role in DNA replication and repair by contributing to the processivity of DNA polymerases and by recruiting proteins that act in DNA replication-associated processes. The ELG1 gene encodes a protein that works, together with the Rfc2-5 subunits (shared by the replication factor C complex), to unload PCNA from chromatin. While ELG1 is not essential for life, deletion of the gene has strong consequences for the stability of the genome, and elg1 mutants exhibit sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, defects in genomic silencing, high mutation rates, and other striking phenotypes. Here, we sought to understand whether all the roles attributed to Elg1 in genome stability maintenance are due to its effects on PCNA unloading, or whether they are due to additional functions of the protein. By using a battery of mutants that affect PCNA accumulation at various degrees, we show that all the phenotypes measured correlate with the amount of PCNA left at the chromatin. Our results thus demonstrate the importance of Elg1 and of PCNA unloading in promoting proper chromatin structure and in maintaining a stable genome.
Collapse
|
7
|
Regulation of BRCA1 stability through the tandem UBX domains of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase 1. Nat Commun 2022; 13:6732. [PMID: 36347866 PMCID: PMC9643514 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34612-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) have evolved to acquire various additional domains. These domains allow ARSs to communicate with other cellular proteins in order to promote non-translational functions. Vertebrate cytoplasmic isoleucyl-tRNA synthetases (IARS1s) have an uncharacterized unique domain, UNE-I. Here, we present the crystal structure of the chicken IARS1 UNE-I complexed with glutamyl-tRNA synthetase 1 (EARS1). UNE-I consists of tandem ubiquitin regulatory X (UBX) domains that interact with a distinct hairpin loop on EARS1 and protect its neighboring proteins in the multi-synthetase complex from degradation. Phosphomimetic mutation of the two serine residues in the hairpin loop releases IARS1 from the complex. IARS1 interacts with BRCA1 in the nucleus, regulates its stability by inhibiting ubiquitylation via the UBX domains, and controls DNA repair function.
Collapse
|
8
|
Tyagi A, Haq S, Ramakrishna S. Redox regulation of DUBs and its therapeutic implications in cancer. Redox Biol 2021; 48:102194. [PMID: 34814083 PMCID: PMC8608616 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.102194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as a double-edged sword in cancer, where low levels of ROS are beneficial but excessive accumulation leads to cancer progression. Elevated levels of ROS in cancer are counteracted by the antioxidant defense system. An imbalance between ROS generation and the antioxidant system alters gene expression and cellular signaling, leading to cancer progression or death. Post-translational modifications, such as ubiquitination, phosphorylation, and SUMOylation, play a critical role in the maintenance of ROS homeostasis by controlling ROS production and clearance. Recent evidence suggests that deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs)-mediated ubiquitin removal from substrates is regulated by ROS. ROS-mediated oxidation of the catalytic cysteine (Cys) of DUBs, leading to their reversible inactivation, has emerged as a key mechanism regulating DUB-controlled cellular events. A better understanding of the mechanism by which DUBs are susceptible to ROS and exploring the ways to utilize ROS to pharmacologically modulate DUB-mediated signaling pathways might provide new insight for anticancer therapeutics. This review assesses the recent findings regarding ROS-mediated signaling in cancers, emphasizes DUB regulation by oxidation, highlights the relevant recent findings, and proposes directions of future research based on the ROS-induced modifications of DUB activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apoorvi Tyagi
- Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, South Korea
| | - Saba Haq
- Department of Life Science, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, South Korea
| | - Suresh Ramakrishna
- Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, South Korea; College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Park SH, Kim Y, Ra JS, Wie MW, Kang MS, Kang S, Myung K, Lee KY. Timely termination of repair DNA synthesis by ATAD5 is important in oxidative DNA damage-induced single-strand break repair. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:11746-11764. [PMID: 34718749 PMCID: PMC8599757 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generate oxidized bases and single-strand breaks (SSBs), which are fixed by base excision repair (BER) and SSB repair (SSBR), respectively. Although excision and repair of damaged bases have been extensively studied, the function of the sliding clamp, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), including loading/unloading, remains unclear. We report that, in addition to PCNA loading by replication factor complex C (RFC), timely PCNA unloading by the ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5 (ATAD5)-RFC-like complex is important for the repair of ROS-induced SSBs. We found that PCNA was loaded at hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-generated direct SSBs after the 3'-terminus was converted to the hydroxyl moiety by end-processing enzymes. However, PCNA loading rarely occurred during BER of oxidized or alkylated bases. ATAD5-depleted cells were sensitive to acute H2O2 treatment but not methyl methanesulfonate treatment. Unexpectedly, when PCNA remained on DNA as a result of ATAD5 depletion, H2O2-induced repair DNA synthesis increased in cancerous and normal cells. Based on higher H2O2-induced DNA breakage and SSBR protein enrichment by ATAD5 depletion, we propose that extended repair DNA synthesis increases the likelihood of DNA polymerase stalling, shown by increased PCNA monoubiquitination, and consequently, harmful nick structures are more frequent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Hyung Park
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Youyoung Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.,Department of Biological Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Sun Ra
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Woo Wie
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.,Department of Biological Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Sun Kang
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Sukhyun Kang
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyungjae Myung
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoo-Young Lee
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sadri Nahand J, Rabiei N, Fathazam R, Taghizadieh M, Ebrahimi MS, Mahjoubin-Tehran M, Bannazadeh Baghi H, Khatami A, Abbasi-Kolli M, Mirzaei HR, Rahimian N, Darvish M, Mirzaei H. Oncogenic viruses and chemoresistance: What do we know? Pharmacol Res 2021; 170:105730. [PMID: 34119621 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Chemoresistance is often referred to as a major leading reason for cancer therapy failure, causing cancer relapse and further metastasis. As a result, an urgent need has been raised to reach a full comprehension of chemoresistance-associated molecular pathways, thereby designing new therapy methods. Many of metastatic tumor masses are found to be related with a viral cause. Although combined therapy is perceived as the model role therapy in such cases, chemoresistant features, which is more common in viral carcinogenesis, often get into way of this kind of therapy, minimizing the chance of survival. Some investigations indicate that the infecting virus dominates other leading factors, i.e., genetic alternations and tumor microenvironment, in development of cancer cell chemoresistance. Herein, we have gathered the available evidence on the mechanisms under which oncogenic viruses cause drug-resistance in chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javid Sadri Nahand
- Department of Virology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nikta Rabiei
- School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Reza Fathazam
- School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Taghizadieh
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Center for Women's Health Research Zahra, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Saeid Ebrahimi
- School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran; Student Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Maryam Mahjoubin-Tehran
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Hossein Bannazadeh Baghi
- Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - AliReza Khatami
- Department of Virology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Abbasi-Kolli
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Neda Rahimian
- Endocrine Research Center, Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
| | - Maryam Darvish
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
| | - Hamed Mirzaei
- Research Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic Diseases, Institute for Basic Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ogawa LM, Buhagiar AF, Abriola L, Leland BA, Surovtseva YV, Baserga SJ. Increased numbers of nucleoli in a genome-wide RNAi screen reveal proteins that link the cell cycle to RNA polymerase I transcription. Mol Biol Cell 2021; 32:956-973. [PMID: 33689394 PMCID: PMC8108525 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e20-10-0670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Nucleoli are dynamic nuclear condensates in eukaryotic cells that originate through ribosome biogenesis at loci that harbor the ribosomal DNA. These loci are known as nucleolar organizer regions (NORs), and there are 10 in a human diploid genome. While there are 10 NORs, however, the number of nucleoli observed in cells is variable. Furthermore, changes in number are associated with disease, with increased numbers and size common in aggressive cancers. In the near-diploid human breast epithelial cell line, MCF10A, the most frequently observed number of nucleoli is two to three per cell. Here, to identify novel regulators of ribosome biogenesis we used high-throughput quantitative imaging of MCF10A cells to identify proteins that, when depleted, increase the percentage of nuclei with ≥5 nucleoli. Unexpectedly, this unique screening approach led to identification of proteins associated with the cell cycle. Functional analysis on a subset of hits further revealed not only proteins required for progression through the S and G2/M phase, but also proteins required explicitly for the regulation of RNA polymerase I transcription and protein synthesis. Thus, results from this screen for increased nucleolar number highlight the significance of the nucleolus in human cell cycle regulation, linking RNA polymerase I transcription to cell cycle progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Ogawa
- Department of Molecular Biophysics & Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520
| | - Amber F Buhagiar
- Department of Molecular Biophysics & Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520
| | - Laura Abriola
- Yale Center for Molecular Discovery, Yale University, West Haven, CT 06516
| | - Bryan A Leland
- Yale Center for Molecular Discovery, Yale University, West Haven, CT 06516
| | - Yulia V Surovtseva
- Yale Center for Molecular Discovery, Yale University, West Haven, CT 06516
| | - Susan J Baserga
- Department of Molecular Biophysics & Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520.,Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee KY, Park SH. Eukaryotic clamp loaders and unloaders in the maintenance of genome stability. Exp Mol Med 2020; 52:1948-1958. [PMID: 33339954 PMCID: PMC8080817 DOI: 10.1038/s12276-020-00533-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) plays a critical role as a processivity factor for DNA polymerases and as a binding and acting platform for many proteins. The ring-shaped PCNA homotrimer and the DNA damage checkpoint clamp 9-1-1 are loaded onto DNA by clamp loaders. PCNA can be loaded by the pentameric replication factor C (RFC) complex and the CTF18-RFC-like complex (RLC) in vitro. In cells, each complex loads PCNA for different purposes; RFC-loaded PCNA is essential for DNA replication, while CTF18-RLC-loaded PCNA participates in cohesion establishment and checkpoint activation. After completing its tasks, PCNA is unloaded by ATAD5 (Elg1 in yeast)-RLC. The 9-1-1 clamp is loaded at DNA damage sites by RAD17 (Rad24 in yeast)-RLC. All five RFC complex components, but none of the three large subunits of RLC, CTF18, ATAD5, or RAD17, are essential for cell survival; however, deficiency of the three RLC proteins leads to genomic instability. In this review, we describe recent findings that contribute to the understanding of the basic roles of the RFC complex and RLCs and how genomic instability due to deficiency of the three RLCs is linked to the molecular and cellular activity of RLC, particularly focusing on ATAD5 (Elg1). The attachment and removal of clamp proteins that encircle DNA as it is copied and assist its replication and maintenance is mediated by DNA clamp loader and unloader proteins; defects in loading and unloading can increase the rate of damaging mutations. Kyoo-young Lee and Su Hyung Park at the Institute for Basic Science in Ulsan, South Korea, review current understanding of the activity of clamp loading and unloading proteins. They examine research on the proteins in eukaryotic cells, those containing a cell nucleus, making their discussion relevant to understanding the stability of the human genome. They focus particular attention on a protein called ATAD5, which is involved in unloading the clamp proteins. Deficiencies in ATAD5 function have been implicated in genetic instability that might lead to several different types of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyoo-Young Lee
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea.
| | - Su Hyung Park
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zuilkoski CM, Skibbens RV. PCNA antagonizes cohesin-dependent roles in genomic stability. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235103. [PMID: 33075068 PMCID: PMC7571713 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PCNA sliding clamp binds factors through which histone deposition, chromatin remodeling, and DNA repair are coupled to DNA replication. PCNA also directly binds Eco1/Ctf7 acetyltransferase, which in turn activates cohesins and establishes cohesion between nascent sister chromatids. While increased recruitment thus explains the mechanism through which elevated levels of chromatin-bound PCNA rescue eco1 mutant cell growth, the mechanism through which PCNA instead worsens cohesin mutant cell growth remains unknown. Possibilities include that elevated levels of long-lived chromatin-bound PCNA reduce either cohesin deposition onto DNA or cohesin acetylation. Instead, our results reveal that PCNA increases the levels of both chromatin-bound cohesin and cohesin acetylation. Beyond sister chromatid cohesion, PCNA also plays a critical role in genomic stability such that high levels of chromatin-bound PCNA elevate genotoxic sensitivities and recombination rates. At a relatively modest increase of chromatin-bound PCNA, however, fork stability and progression appear normal in wildtype cells. Our results reveal that even a moderate increase of PCNA indeed sensitizes cohesin mutant cells to DNA damaging agents and in a process that involves the DNA damage response kinase Mec1(ATR), but not Tel1(ATM). These and other findings suggest that PCNA mis-regulation results in genome instabilities that normally are resolved by cohesin. Elevating levels of chromatin-bound PCNA may thus help target cohesinopathic cells linked that are linked to cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin M. Zuilkoski
- Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Robert V. Skibbens
- Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim S, Kang N, Park SH, Wells J, Hwang T, Ryu E, Kim BG, Hwang S, Kim SJ, Kang S, Lee S, Stirling P, Myung K, Lee KY. ATAD5 restricts R-loop formation through PCNA unloading and RNA helicase maintenance at the replication fork. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:7218-7238. [PMID: 32542338 PMCID: PMC7367208 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
R-loops are formed when replicative forks collide with the transcriptional machinery and can cause genomic instability. However, it is unclear how R-loops are regulated at transcription-replication conflict (TRC) sites and how replisome proteins are regulated to prevent R-loop formation or mediate R-loop tolerance. Here, we report that ATAD5, a PCNA unloader, plays dual functions to reduce R-loops both under normal and replication stress conditions. ATAD5 interacts with RNA helicases such as DDX1, DDX5, DDX21 and DHX9 and increases the abundance of these helicases at replication forks to facilitate R-loop resolution. Depletion of ATAD5 or ATAD5-interacting RNA helicases consistently increases R-loops during the S phase and reduces the replication rate, both of which are enhanced by replication stress. In addition to R-loop resolution, ATAD5 prevents the generation of new R-loops behind the replication forks by unloading PCNA which, otherwise, accumulates and persists on DNA, causing a collision with the transcription machinery. Depletion of ATAD5 reduces transcription rates due to PCNA accumulation. Consistent with the role of ATAD5 and RNA helicases in maintaining genomic integrity by regulating R-loops, the corresponding genes were mutated or downregulated in several human tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangin Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea.,Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Nalae Kang
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Su Hyung Park
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea
| | - James Wells
- Terry Fox laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Taejoo Hwang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Eunjin Ryu
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea.,Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Byung-Gyu Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Sunyoung Hwang
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Seong-Jung Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea.,Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Sukhyun Kang
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Semin Lee
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Peter Stirling
- Terry Fox laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Kyungjae Myung
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea.,Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Kyoo-Young Lee
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim SJ, Wie M, Park SH, Kim TM, Park JH, Kim S, Myung K, Lee KY. ATAD5 suppresses centrosome over-duplication by regulating UAF1 and ID1. Cell Cycle 2020; 19:1952-1968. [PMID: 32594826 PMCID: PMC7469630 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2020.1785724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Centrosomes are the primary microtubule-organizing centers that are important for mitotic spindle assembly. Centrosome amplification is commonly observed in human cancer cells and contributes to genomic instability. However, it is not clear how centrosome duplication is dysregulated in cancer cells. Here, we report that ATAD5, a replisome protein that unloads PCNA from chromatin as a replication factor C-like complex (RLC), plays an important role in regulating centrosome duplication. ATAD5 is present at the centrosome, specifically at the base of the mother and daughter centrioles that undergo duplication. UAF1, which interacts with ATAD5 and regulates PCNA deubiquitination as a complex with ubiquitin-specific protease 1, is also localized at the centrosome. Depletion of ATAD5 or UAF1 increases cells with over-duplicated centrosome whereas ATAD5 overexpression reduces such cells. Consistently, the proportion of cells showing the multipolar mode of chromosome segregation is increased among ATAD5-depleted cells. The localization and function of ATAD5 at the centrosomes do not require other RLC subunits. UAF1 interacts and co-localizes with ID1, a protein that increases centrosome amplification upon overexpression. ATAD5 depletion reduces interactions between UAF1 and ID1 and increases ID1 signal at the centrosome, providing a mechanistic framework for understanding the role of ATAD5 in centrosome duplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong-Jung Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science , Ulsan, Korea.,Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology , Ulsan, Korea
| | - Minwoo Wie
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science , Ulsan, Korea.,Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology , Ulsan, Korea
| | - Su Hyung Park
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science , Ulsan, Korea
| | - Tae Moon Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science , Ulsan, Korea
| | - Jun Hong Park
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science , Ulsan, Korea.,Herbal Medicine Resources Research Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine , Naju-si, Republic of Korea
| | - Shinseog Kim
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science , Ulsan, Korea
| | - Kyungjae Myung
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science , Ulsan, Korea.,Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology , Ulsan, Korea
| | - Kyoo-Young Lee
- Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science , Ulsan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Giovannini S, Weller MC, Hanzlíková H, Shiota T, Takeda S, Jiricny J. ATAD5 deficiency alters DNA damage metabolism and sensitizes cells to PARP inhibition. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:4928-4939. [PMID: 32297953 PMCID: PMC7229844 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Replication factor C (RFC), a heteropentamer of RFC1-5, loads PCNA onto DNA during replication and repair. Once DNA synthesis has ceased, PCNA must be unloaded. Recent findings assign the uloader role primarily to an RFC-like (RLC) complex, in which the largest RFC subunit, RFC1, has been replaced with ATAD5 (ELG1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae). ATAD5-RLC appears to be indispensable, given that Atad5 knock-out leads to embryonic lethality. In order to learn how the retention of PCNA on DNA might interfere with normal DNA metabolism, we studied the response of ATAD5-depleted cells to several genotoxic agents. We show that ATAD5 deficiency leads to hypersensitivity to methyl methanesulphonate (MMS), camptothecin (CPT) and mitomycin C (MMC), agents that hinder the progression of replication forks. We further show that ATAD5-depleted cells are sensitive to poly(ADP)ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and that the processing of spontaneous oxidative DNA damage contributes towards this sensitivity. We posit that PCNA molecules trapped on DNA interfere with the correct metabolism of arrested replication forks, phenotype reminiscent of defective homologous recombination (HR). As Atad5 heterozygous mice are cancer-prone and as ATAD5 mutations have been identified in breast and endometrial cancers, our finding may open a path towards the therapy of these tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Giovannini
- Institute of Molecular Life Sciences of the University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Molecular Cancer Research of the University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Biochemistry of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Otto-Stern-Weg 3, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marie-Christine Weller
- Institute of Molecular Cancer Research of the University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hana Hanzlíková
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 142-20 Prague 4, Czech Republic
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Tetsuya Shiota
- Department of Radiation Genetics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 606-8501 Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shunichi Takeda
- Department of Radiation Genetics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 606-8501 Kyoto, Japan
| | - Josef Jiricny
- Institute of Molecular Life Sciences of the University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Molecular Cancer Research of the University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Biochemistry of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Otto-Stern-Weg 3, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +41 44 633 6260;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Paul Solomon Devakumar LJ, Gaubitz C, Lundblad V, Kelch BA, Kubota T. Effective mismatch repair depends on timely control of PCNA retention on DNA by the Elg1 complex. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 47:6826-6841. [PMID: 31114918 PMCID: PMC6648347 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Revised: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a sliding clamp that acts as a central co-ordinator for mismatch repair (MMR) as well as DNA replication. Loss of Elg1, the major subunit of the PCNA unloader complex, causes over-accumulation of PCNA on DNA and also increases mutation rate, but it has been unclear if the two effects are linked. Here we show that timely removal of PCNA from DNA by the Elg1 complex is important to prevent mutations. Although premature unloading of PCNA generally increases mutation rate, the mutator phenotype of elg1Δ is attenuated by PCNA mutants PCNA-R14E and PCNA-D150E that spontaneously fall off DNA. In contrast, the elg1Δ mutator phenotype is exacerbated by PCNA mutants that accumulate on DNA due to enhanced electrostatic PCNA–DNA interactions. Epistasis analysis suggests that PCNA over-accumulation on DNA interferes with both MMR and MMR-independent process(es). In elg1Δ, over-retained PCNA hyper-recruits the Msh2–Msh6 mismatch recognition complex through its PCNA-interacting peptide motif, causing accumulation of MMR intermediates. Our results suggest that PCNA retention controlled by the Elg1 complex is critical for efficient MMR: PCNA needs to be on DNA long enough to enable MMR, but if it is retained too long it interferes with downstream repair steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lovely Jael Paul Solomon Devakumar
- Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences & Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, UK
| | - Christl Gaubitz
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
| | | | - Brian A Kelch
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
| | - Takashi Kubota
- Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences & Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hsieh JH, Smith-Roe SL, Huang R, Sedykh A, Shockley KR, Auerbach SS, Merrick BA, Xia M, Tice RR, Witt KL. Identifying Compounds with Genotoxicity Potential Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays. Chem Res Toxicol 2019; 32:1384-1401. [PMID: 31243984 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Genotoxicity is a critical component of a comprehensive toxicological profile. The Tox21 Program used five quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays measuring some aspect of DNA damage/repair to provide information on the genotoxic potential of over 10 000 compounds. Included were assays detecting activation of p53, increases in the DNA repair protein ATAD5, phosphorylation of H2AX, and enhanced cytotoxicity in DT40 cells deficient in DNA-repair proteins REV3 or KU70/RAD54. Each assay measures a distinct component of the DNA damage response signaling network; >70% of active compounds were detected in only one of the five assays. When qHTS results were compared with results from three standard genotoxicity assays (bacterial mutation, in vitro chromosomal aberration, and in vivo micronucleus), a maximum of 40% of known, direct-acting genotoxicants were active in one or more of the qHTS genotoxicity assays, indicating low sensitivity. This suggests that these qHTS assays cannot in their current form be used to replace traditional genotoxicity assays. However, despite the low sensitivity, ranking chemicals by potency of response in the qHTS assays revealed an enrichment for genotoxicants up to 12-fold compared with random selection, when allowing a 1% false positive rate. This finding indicates these qHTS assays can be used to prioritize chemicals for further investigation, allowing resources to focus on compounds most likely to induce genotoxic effects. To refine this prioritization process, models for predicting the genotoxicity potential of chemicals that were active in Tox21 genotoxicity assays were constructed using all Tox21 assay data, yielding a prediction accuracy up to 0.83. Data from qHTS assays related to stress-response pathway signaling (including genotoxicity) were the most informative for model construction. By using the results from qHTS genotoxicity assays, predictions from models based on qHTS data, and predictions from commercial bacterial mutagenicity QSAR models, we prioritized Tox21 chemicals for genotoxicity characterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jui-Hua Hsieh
- Kelly Government Solutions , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina 27709 , United States
| | - Stephanie L Smith-Roe
- Division of the National Toxicology Program , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina 27709 , United States
| | - Ruili Huang
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences , National Institutes of Health , Rockville , Maryland 20850 , United States
| | - Alexander Sedykh
- Sciome, LLC , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina 27709 , United States
| | - Keith R Shockley
- Division of Intramural Research , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina 27709 , United States
| | - Scott S Auerbach
- Division of the National Toxicology Program , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina 27709 , United States
| | - B Alex Merrick
- Division of the National Toxicology Program , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina 27709 , United States
| | - Menghang Xia
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences , National Institutes of Health , Rockville , Maryland 20850 , United States
| | - Raymond R Tice
- RTice Consulting , Hillsborough , North Carolina 27278 , United States
| | - Kristine L Witt
- Division of the National Toxicology Program , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina 27709 , United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tamang S, Kishkevich A, Morrow CA, Osman F, Jalan M, Whitby MC. The PCNA unloader Elg1 promotes recombination at collapsed replication forks in fission yeast. eLife 2019; 8:47277. [PMID: 31149897 PMCID: PMC6544435 DOI: 10.7554/elife.47277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Protein-DNA complexes can impede DNA replication and cause replication fork collapse. Whilst it is known that homologous recombination is deployed in such instances to restart replication, it is unclear how a stalled fork transitions into a collapsed fork at which recombination proteins can load. Previously we established assays in Schizosaccharomyces pombe for studying recombination induced by replication fork collapse at the site-specific protein-DNA barrier RTS1 (Nguyen et al., 2015). Here, we provide evidence that efficient recruitment/retention of two key recombination proteins (Rad51 and Rad52) to RTS1 depends on unloading of the polymerase sliding clamp PCNA from DNA by Elg1. We also show that, in the absence of Elg1, reduced recombination is partially suppressed by deleting fbh1 or, to a lesser extent, srs2, which encode known anti-recombinogenic DNA helicases. These findings suggest that PCNA unloading by Elg1 is necessary to limit Fbh1 and Srs2 activity, and thereby enable recombination to proceed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeeta Tamang
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Carl A Morrow
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Fekret Osman
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Manisha Jalan
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew C Whitby
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
SHPRH regulates rRNA transcription by recognizing the histone code in an mTOR-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:E3424-E3433. [PMID: 28400511 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701978114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Many DNA repair proteins have additional functions other than their roles in DNA repair. In addition to catalyzing PCNA polyubiquitylation in response to the stalling of DNA replication, SHPRH has the additional function of facilitating rRNA transcription by localizing to the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter in the nucleoli. SHPRH was recruited to the rDNA promoter using its plant homeodomain (PHD), which interacts with histone H3 when the fourth lysine of H3 is not trimethylated. SHPRH enrichment at the rDNA promoter was inhibited by cell starvation, by treatment with actinomycin D or rapamycin, or by depletion of CHD4. SHPRH also physically interacted with the RNA polymerase I complex. Taken together, we provide evidence that SHPRH functions in rRNA transcription through its interaction with histone H3 in a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent manner.
Collapse
|
21
|
Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Mautner VF, Cooper DN. Emerging genotype-phenotype relationships in patients with large NF1 deletions. Hum Genet 2017; 136:349-376. [PMID: 28213670 PMCID: PMC5370280 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-017-1766-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The most frequent recurring mutations in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are large deletions encompassing the NF1 gene and its flanking regions (NF1 microdeletions). The majority of these deletions encompass 1.4-Mb and are associated with the loss of 14 protein-coding genes and four microRNA genes. Patients with germline type-1 NF1 microdeletions frequently exhibit dysmorphic facial features, overgrowth/tall-for-age stature, significant delay in cognitive development, large hands and feet, hyperflexibility of joints and muscular hypotonia. Such patients also display significantly more cardiovascular anomalies as compared with patients without large deletions and often exhibit increased numbers of subcutaneous, plexiform and spinal neurofibromas as compared with the general NF1 population. Further, an extremely high burden of internal neurofibromas, characterised by >3000 ml tumour volume, is encountered significantly, more frequently, in non-mosaic NF1 microdeletion patients than in NF1 patients lacking such deletions. NF1 microdeletion patients also have an increased risk of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs); their lifetime MPNST risk is 16-26%, rather higher than that of NF1 patients with intragenic NF1 mutations (8-13%). NF1 microdeletion patients, therefore, represent a high-risk group for the development of MPNSTs, tumours which are very aggressive and difficult to treat. Co-deletion of the SUZ12 gene in addition to NF1 further increases the MPNST risk in NF1 microdeletion patients. Here, we summarise current knowledge about genotype-phenotype relationships in NF1 microdeletion patients and discuss the potential role of the genes located within the NF1 microdeletion interval whose haploinsufficiency may contribute to the more severe clinical phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Victor-Felix Mautner
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David N Cooper
- Institute of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Control of Genome Integrity by RFC Complexes; Conductors of PCNA Loading onto and Unloading from Chromatin during DNA Replication. Genes (Basel) 2017; 8:genes8020052. [PMID: 28134787 PMCID: PMC5333041 DOI: 10.3390/genes8020052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Accepted: 01/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
During cell division, genome integrity is maintained by faithful DNA replication during S phase, followed by accurate segregation in mitosis. Many DNA metabolic events linked with DNA replication are also regulated throughout the cell cycle. In eukaryotes, the DNA sliding clamp, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), acts on chromatin as a processivity factor for DNA polymerases. Since its discovery, many other PCNA binding partners have been identified that function during DNA replication, repair, recombination, chromatin remodeling, cohesion, and proteolysis in cell-cycle progression. PCNA not only recruits the proteins involved in such events, but it also actively controls their function as chromatin assembles. Therefore, control of PCNA-loading onto chromatin is fundamental for various replication-coupled reactions. PCNA is loaded onto chromatin by PCNA-loading replication factor C (RFC) complexes. Both RFC1-RFC and Ctf18-RFC fundamentally function as PCNA loaders. On the other hand, after DNA synthesis, PCNA must be removed from chromatin by Elg1-RFC. Functional defects in RFC complexes lead to chromosomal abnormalities. In this review, we summarize the structural and functional relationships among RFC complexes, and describe how the regulation of PCNA loading/unloading by RFC complexes contributes to maintaining genome integrity.
Collapse
|
23
|
Shkedy D, Singh N, Shemesh K, Amir A, Geiger T, Liefshitz B, Harari Y, Kupiec M. Regulation of Elg1 activity by phosphorylation. Cell Cycle 2016; 14:3689-97. [PMID: 26177013 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1068475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
ELG1 is a conserved gene with important roles in the maintenance of genome stability. Elg1's activity prevents gross chromosomal rearrangements, maintains proper telomere length regulation, helps repairing DNA damage created by a number of genotoxins and participates in sister chromatid cohesion. Elg1 is evolutionarily conserved, and its Fanconi Anemia-related mammalian ortholog (also known as ATAD5) is embryonic lethal when lost in mice and acts as a tumor suppressor in mice and humans. Elg1 encodes a protein that forms an RFC-like complex that unloads the replicative clamp, PCNA, from DNA, mainly in its SUMOylated form. We have identified 2 different regions in yeast Elg1 that undergo phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of one of them, S112, is dependent on the ATR yeast ortholog, Mec1, and probably is a direct target of this kinase. We show that phosphorylation of Elg1 is important for its role at telomeres. Mutants unable to undergo phosphorylation suppress the DNA damage sensitivity of Δrad5 mutants, defective for an error-free post-replicational bypass pathway. This indicates a role of phosphorylation in the regulation of DNA repair. Our results open the way to investigate the mechanisms by which the activity of Elg1 is regulated during DNA replication and in response to DNA damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dganit Shkedy
- a Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology ; Tel Aviv University ; Ramat Aviv , Israel
| | - Nishant Singh
- a Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology ; Tel Aviv University ; Ramat Aviv , Israel
| | - Keren Shemesh
- a Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology ; Tel Aviv University ; Ramat Aviv , Israel
| | - Ayelet Amir
- a Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology ; Tel Aviv University ; Ramat Aviv , Israel
| | - Tamar Geiger
- b Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry ; Sackler Faculty of Medicine; Tel Aviv University ; Ramat Aviv , Israel
| | - Batia Liefshitz
- a Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology ; Tel Aviv University ; Ramat Aviv , Israel
| | - Yaniv Harari
- a Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology ; Tel Aviv University ; Ramat Aviv , Israel
| | - Martin Kupiec
- a Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology ; Tel Aviv University ; Ramat Aviv , Israel
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Huang F, Saraf A, Florens L, Kusch T, Swanson SK, Szerszen LT, Li G, Dutta A, Washburn MP, Abmayr SM, Workman JL. The Enok acetyltransferase complex interacts with Elg1 and negatively regulates PCNA unloading to promote the G1/S transition. Genes Dev 2016; 30:1198-210. [PMID: 27198229 PMCID: PMC4888840 DOI: 10.1101/gad.271429.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2015] [Accepted: 04/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
KAT6 histone acetyltransferases (HATs) are highly conserved in eukaryotes and are involved in cell cycle regulation. However, information regarding their roles in regulating cell cycle progression is limited. Here, we report the identification of subunits of the Drosophila Enok complex and demonstrate that all subunits are important for its HAT activity. We further report a novel interaction between the Enok complex and the Elg1 proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-unloader complex. Depletion of Enok in S2 cells resulted in a G1/S cell cycle block, and this block can be partially relieved by depleting Elg1. Furthermore, depletion of Enok reduced the chromatin-bound levels of PCNA in both S2 cells and early embryos, suggesting that the Enok complex may interact with the Elg1 complex and down-regulate its PCNA-unloading function to promote the G1/S transition. Supporting this hypothesis, depletion of Enok also partially rescued the endoreplication defects in Elg1-depleted nurse cells. Taken together, our study provides novel insights into the roles of KAT6 HATs in cell cycle regulation through modulating PCNA levels on chromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fu Huang
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA; Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
| | - Anita Saraf
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA
| | - Laurence Florens
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA
| | - Thomas Kusch
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
| | - Selene K Swanson
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA
| | - Leanne T Szerszen
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA
| | - Ge Li
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA
| | - Arnob Dutta
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA
| | - Michael P Washburn
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA
| | - Susan M Abmayr
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA
| | - Jerry L Workman
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ghosh A, Ghosh S, Dasgupta D, Ghosh A, Datta S, Sikdar N, Datta S, Chowdhury A, Banerjee S. Hepatitis B Virus X Protein Upregulates hELG1/ ATAD5 Expression through E2F1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Biol Sci 2016; 12:30-41. [PMID: 26722215 PMCID: PMC4679396 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.12310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2015] [Accepted: 10/04/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The precise mechanism by which HBx protein of hepatitis B virus (HBV) impacts on hepato-carcinogenesis remain largely elusive despite strong evidences for its' involvement in the process. Here, we have investigated the role of HBx on expression of a novel gene hELG1/ATAD5, which is required for genome maintenance and its' importance in hepatocarcinogenesis. This study has for the first time showed that the expression of this gene was significantly higher in human cancer such as HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and in different HCC cell lines compared to normal liver. In addition, a significant elevation in ATAD5 expression was also found in HBx transfected HCC cell lines implicating HBx mediated transcriptional regulation on ATAD5. Using different deletion mutant constructs of putative promoter, the active promoter region was first identified here and subsequently the regulatory region of HBx was mapped by promoter-luciferase assay. But ChIP assay with anti-HBx antibody revealed that HBx was not physically present in ATAD5 transcription machinery whereas anti-E2F1 antibody showed the presence of E2F1 in the complex. Luciferase assay with E2F1 binding site mutant had further confirmed it. Moreover, both loss-and gain-of-function studies of ATAD5 showed that ATAD5 could enhance HBV production in transfected cells whereas knock down of ATAD5 increased the sensitivity of HCC cell line to chemotherapeutics 5-fluorouracil. Overall, this data suggests that a positive feedback loop regulation between ATAD5 and HBV contributed to both viral replication and chemo-resistance of HCC cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alip Ghosh
- 1. Centre for Liver Research, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India
| | - Suchandrima Ghosh
- 1. Centre for Liver Research, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India
| | - Debanjali Dasgupta
- 1. Centre for Liver Research, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India
| | - Amit Ghosh
- 1. Centre for Liver Research, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India
| | - Somenath Datta
- 1. Centre for Liver Research, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India
| | | | - Simanti Datta
- 1. Centre for Liver Research, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India
| | - Abhijit Chowdhury
- 3. Department of Hepatology, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India
| | - Soma Banerjee
- 1. Centre for Liver Research, School of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Turinetto V, Giachino C. Multiple facets of histone variant H2AX: a DNA double-strand-break marker with several biological functions. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:2489-98. [PMID: 25712102 PMCID: PMC4357700 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 277] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, many papers highlighted that the histone variant H2AX and its phosphorylation on Ser 139 (γH2AX) cannot be simply considered a specific DNA double-strand-break (DSB) marker with a role restricted to the DNA damage response, but rather as a ‘protagonist’ in different scenarios. This review will present and discuss an up-to-date view regarding the ‘non-canonical’ H2AX roles, focusing in particular on possible functional and structural parts in contexts different from the canonical DNA DSB response. We will present aspects concerning sex chromosome inactivation in male germ cells, X inactivation in female somatic cells and mitosis, but will also focus on the more recent studies regarding embryonic and neural stem cell development, asymmetric sister chromosome segregation in stem cells and cellular senescence maintenance. We will discuss whether in these new contexts there might be a relation with the canonical DNA DSB signalling function that could justify γH2AX formation. The authors will emphasize that, just as H2AX phosphorylation signals chromatin alteration and serves the canonical function of recruiting DSB repair factors, so the modification of H2AX in contexts other than the DNA damage response may contribute towards creating a specific chromatin structure frame allowing ‘non-canonical’ functions to be carried out in different cell types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Turinetto
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Claudia Giachino
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kuchenbaecker KB, Ramus SJ, Tyrer J, Lee A, Shen HC, Beesley J, Lawrenson K, McGuffog L, Healey S, Lee JM, Spindler TJ, Lin YG, Pejovic T, Bean Y, Li Q, Coetzee S, Hazelett D, Miron A, Southey M, Terry MB, Goldgar DE, Buys SS, Janavicius R, Dorfling CM, van Rensburg EJ, Neuhausen SL, Ding YC, Hansen TVO, Jønson L, Gerdes AM, Ejlertsen B, Barrowdale D, Dennis J, Benitez J, Osorio A, Garcia MJ, Komenaka I, Weitzel JN, Ganschow P, Peterlongo P, Bernard L, Viel A, Bonanni B, Peissel B, Manoukian S, Radice P, Papi L, Ottini L, Fostira F, Konstantopoulou I, Garber J, Frost D, Perkins J, Platte R, Ellis S, Godwin AK, Schmutzler RK, Meindl A, Engel C, Sutter C, Sinilnikova OM, Damiola F, Mazoyer S, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Claes K, De Leeneer K, Kirk J, Rodriguez GC, Piedmonte M, O'Malley DM, de la Hoya M, Caldes T, Aittomäki K, Nevanlinna H, Collée JM, Rookus MA, Oosterwijk JC, Tihomirova L, Tung N, Hamann U, Isaccs C, Tischkowitz M, Imyanitov EN, Caligo MA, Campbell IG, Hogervorst FBL, Olah E, Diez O, Blanco I, Brunet J, Lazaro C, Pujana MA, Jakubowska A, Gronwald J, Lubinski J, Sukiennicki G, Barkardottir RB, Plante M, Simard J, Soucy P, et alKuchenbaecker KB, Ramus SJ, Tyrer J, Lee A, Shen HC, Beesley J, Lawrenson K, McGuffog L, Healey S, Lee JM, Spindler TJ, Lin YG, Pejovic T, Bean Y, Li Q, Coetzee S, Hazelett D, Miron A, Southey M, Terry MB, Goldgar DE, Buys SS, Janavicius R, Dorfling CM, van Rensburg EJ, Neuhausen SL, Ding YC, Hansen TVO, Jønson L, Gerdes AM, Ejlertsen B, Barrowdale D, Dennis J, Benitez J, Osorio A, Garcia MJ, Komenaka I, Weitzel JN, Ganschow P, Peterlongo P, Bernard L, Viel A, Bonanni B, Peissel B, Manoukian S, Radice P, Papi L, Ottini L, Fostira F, Konstantopoulou I, Garber J, Frost D, Perkins J, Platte R, Ellis S, Godwin AK, Schmutzler RK, Meindl A, Engel C, Sutter C, Sinilnikova OM, Damiola F, Mazoyer S, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Claes K, De Leeneer K, Kirk J, Rodriguez GC, Piedmonte M, O'Malley DM, de la Hoya M, Caldes T, Aittomäki K, Nevanlinna H, Collée JM, Rookus MA, Oosterwijk JC, Tihomirova L, Tung N, Hamann U, Isaccs C, Tischkowitz M, Imyanitov EN, Caligo MA, Campbell IG, Hogervorst FBL, Olah E, Diez O, Blanco I, Brunet J, Lazaro C, Pujana MA, Jakubowska A, Gronwald J, Lubinski J, Sukiennicki G, Barkardottir RB, Plante M, Simard J, Soucy P, Montagna M, Tognazzo S, Teixeira MR, Pankratz VS, Wang X, Lindor N, Szabo CI, Kauff N, Vijai J, Aghajanian CA, Pfeiler G, Berger A, Singer CF, Tea MK, Phelan CM, Greene MH, Mai PL, Rennert G, Mulligan AM, Tchatchou S, Andrulis IL, Glendon G, Toland AE, Jensen UB, Kruse TA, Thomassen M, Bojesen A, Zidan J, Friedman E, Laitman Y, Soller M, Liljegren A, Arver B, Einbeigi Z, Stenmark-Askmalm M, Olopade OI, Nussbaum RL, Rebbeck TR, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM, Lu KH, Karlan BY, Walsh C, Lester J, Hein A, Ekici AB, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Lambrechts D, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Lambrechts S, Dicks E, Doherty JA, Wicklund KG, Rossing MA, Rudolph A, Chang-Claude J, Wang-Gohrke S, Eilber U, Moysich KB, Odunsi K, Sucheston L, Lele S, Wilkens LR, Goodman MT, Thompson PJ, Shvetsov YB, Runnebaum IB, Dürst M, Hillemanns P, Dörk T, Antonenkova N, Bogdanova N, Leminen A, Pelttari LM, Butzow R, Modugno F, Kelley JL, Edwards RP, Ness RB, du Bois A, Heitz F, Schwaab I, Harter P, Matsuo K, Hosono S, Orsulic S, Jensen A, Kjaer SK, Hogdall E, Hasmad HN, Azmi MAN, Teo SH, Woo YL, Fridley BL, Goode EL, Cunningham JM, Vierkant RA, Bruinsma F, Giles GG, Liang D, Hildebrandt MAT, Wu X, Levine DA, Bisogna M, Berchuck A, Iversen ES, Schildkraut JM, Concannon P, Weber RP, Cramer DW, Terry KL, Poole EM, Tworoger SS, Bandera EV, Orlow I, Olson SH, Krakstad C, Salvesen HB, Tangen IL, Bjorge L, van Altena AM, Aben KKH, Kiemeney LA, Massuger LFAG, Kellar M, Brooks-Wilson A, Kelemen LE, Cook LS, Le ND, Cybulski C, Yang H, Lissowska J, Brinton LA, Wentzensen N, Hogdall C, Lundvall L, Nedergaard L, Baker H, Song H, Eccles D, McNeish I, Paul J, Carty K, Siddiqui N, Glasspool R, Whittemore AS, Rothstein JH, McGuire V, Sieh W, Ji BT, Zheng W, Shu XO, Gao YT, Rosen B, Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Narod SA, Monteiro AN, Chen A, Lin HY, Permuth-Wey J, Sellers TA, Tsai YY, Chen Z, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Harrington P, Lee AW, Wu AH, Pearce CL, Coetzee G, Pike MC, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Timorek A, Rzepecka IK, Kupryjanczyk J, Freedman M, Noushmehr H, Easton DF, Offit K, Couch FJ, Gayther S, Pharoah PP, Antoniou AC, Chenevix-Trench G. Identification of six new susceptibility loci for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Nat Genet 2015; 47:164-71. [PMID: 25581431 PMCID: PMC4445140 DOI: 10.1038/ng.3185] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 197] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2014] [Accepted: 12/05/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 12 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) susceptibility alleles. The pattern of association at these loci is consistent in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who are at high risk of EOC. After imputation to 1000 Genomes Project data, we assessed associations of 11 million genetic variants with EOC risk from 15,437 cases unselected for family history and 30,845 controls and from 15,252 BRCA1 mutation carriers and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers (3,096 with ovarian cancer), and we combined the results in a meta-analysis. This new study design yielded increased statistical power, leading to the discovery of six new EOC susceptibility loci. Variants at 1p36 (nearest gene, WNT4), 4q26 (SYNPO2), 9q34.2 (ABO) and 17q11.2 (ATAD5) were associated with EOC risk, and at 1p34.3 (RSPO1) and 6p22.1 (GPX6) variants were specifically associated with the serous EOC subtype, all with P < 5 × 10(-8). Incorporating these variants into risk assessment tools will improve clinical risk predictions for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoline B Kuchenbaecker
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Susan J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Tyrer
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew Lee
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Howard C Shen
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Beesley
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sue Healey
- Cancer Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Janet M Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tassja J Spindler
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Yvonne G Lin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- 1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. [2] Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Yukie Bean
- 1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. [2] Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Qiyuan Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Simon Coetzee
- 1] Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. [2] Center for Cell-Based Therapy, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. [3] Center for Integrative Systems Biology, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Dennis Hazelett
- 1] Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. [2] Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Alexander Miron
- Department of Genomics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University Medical School, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Melissa Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ramunas Janavicius
- 1] Department of Molecular and Regenerative Medicine, Hematology, Oncology and Transfusion Medical Center, Vilinius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics, Hematology, Oncology and Transfusion Medicine Center, Department of Molecular and Regenerative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania. [2] State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | | | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Yuan Chun Ding
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Thomas V O Hansen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Jønson
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Barrowdale
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joe Dennis
- 1] Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. [2] Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Javier Benitez
- 1] Human Genetics Group, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain. [2] Human Genotyping Unit (CEGEN), Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain. [3] Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Osorio
- 1] Human Genetics Group, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain. [2] Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Garcia
- 1] Human Genetics Group, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain. [2] Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ian Komenaka
- Maricopa Medical Center, care of City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Weitzel
- Clinical Cancer Genetics, for the City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Pamela Ganschow
- Cook County Health and Hospital System, care of City of Hope Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Fondazione Istituto FIRC (Italian Foundation for Cancer Research) di Oncologia Molecolare (IFOM), Milan, Italy
| | - Loris Bernard
- 1] Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy. [2] Cogentech Cancer Genetic Test Laboratory, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Viel
- Division of Experimental Oncology, CRO (Centro di Riferimento Oncologico) Aviano National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernard Peissel
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (Italian Research Hospital)) Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (Italian Research Hospital)) Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Papi
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Ottini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Florentia Fostira
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES (Institute of Nuclear and Radiological Sciences and Technology), National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Aghia Paraskevi Attikis, Athens, Greece
| | - Irene Konstantopoulou
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES (Institute of Nuclear and Radiological Sciences and Technology), National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Aghia Paraskevi Attikis, Athens, Greece
| | - Judy Garber
- Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jo Perkins
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Radka Platte
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Steve Ellis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Rita Katharina Schmutzler
- 1] Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. [2] Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. [3] Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. [4] On behalf of the German Consortium of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC)
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Tumor Genetics, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olga M Sinilnikova
- 1] INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université Lyon, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France. [2] Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Hospices Civils de Lyon-Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Francesca Damiola
- INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université Lyon, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Mazoyer
- INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR 5286, Université Lyon, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- 1] Institut Curie, Department of Tumour Biology, Paris, France. [2] Institut Curie, INSERM U830, Paris, France. [3] Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Kathleen Claes
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kim De Leeneer
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Judy Kirk
- Australia New Zealand Gynecologic Oncology Group (ANZGOG) and Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hosptial, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gustavo C Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Marion Piedmonte
- Gynecologic Oncology Group, Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | | | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - Trinidad Caldes
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - J Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matti A Rookus
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan C Oosterwijk
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Nadine Tung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudine Isaccs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Program in Cancer Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Maria A Caligo
- Section of Genetic Oncology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Pisa and University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ian G Campbell
- VBCRC (Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium) Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Edith Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Orland Diez
- Oncogenetics Group, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Blanco
- Genetic Counseling Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute)-Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Brunet
- Genetic Counseling Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBGI (Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona)-Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBELL-Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miquel Angel Pujana
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Hereditary Cancer Program, IDIBELL-Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Sukiennicki
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital and Biomedical Centre (BMC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Marie Plante
- Gynaecologic Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHUQ), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jacques Simard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHUQ) Research Center, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Penny Soucy
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHUQ) Research Center, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV)-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Silvia Tognazzo
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV)-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- 1] Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), Porto University, Porto, Portugal. [2] Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Vernon S Pankratz
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Xianshu Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Noralane Lindor
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Csilla I Szabo
- National Human Genome Research Institute, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Noah Kauff
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joseph Vijai
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carol A Aghajanian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Georg Pfeiler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Berger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Muy-Kheng Tea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Catherine M Phelan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Mark H Greene
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Gad Rennert
- Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- 1] Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [2] Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandrine Tchatchou
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- 1] Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [2] Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gord Glendon
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amanda Ewart Toland
- Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Uffe Birk Jensen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Torben A Kruse
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Bojesen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Jamal Zidan
- Institute of Oncology, Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yael Laitman
- Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Maria Soller
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Annelie Liljegren
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Brita Arver
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Zakaria Einbeigi
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marie Stenmark-Askmalm
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Olufunmilayo I Olopade
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Robert L Nussbaum
- Department of Medicine and Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Christine Walsh
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jenny Lester
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arif B Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- 1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. [2] Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- 1] Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, Belgium. [2] Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sandrina Lambrechts
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ed Dicks
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Section of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Kristine G Wicklund
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- 1] Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA. [2] Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Anja Rudolph
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Shan Wang-Gohrke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ursula Eilber
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Lara Sucheston
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Shashi Lele
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Marc T Goodman
- 1] Cancer Prevention and Control, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. [2] Community and Population Health Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Pamela J Thompson
- 1] Cancer Prevention and Control, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. [2] Community and Population Health Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Yurii B Shvetsov
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Ingo B Runnebaum
- Department of Gynecology, Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Matthias Dürst
- Department of Gynecology, Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Natalia Antonenkova
- Byelorussian Institute for Oncology and Medical Radiology Aleksandrov N.N., Minsk, Belarus
| | - Natalia Bogdanova
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Arto Leminen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Liisa M Pelttari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ralf Butzow
- 1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. [2] Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- 1] Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. [2] Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. [3] Ovarian Cancer Center of Excellence, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. [4] Women's Cancer Research Program, Magee-Women's Research Institute and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert P Edwards
- 1] Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. [2] Ovarian Cancer Center of Excellence, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roberta B Ness
- University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andreas du Bois
- 1] Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany. [2] Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- 1] Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany. [2] Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Ira Schwaab
- Institut für Humangenetik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- 1] Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany. [2] Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Kyushu University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Satoyo Hosono
- Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Allan Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne Kruger Kjaer
- 1] Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark. [2] Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Estrid Hogdall
- 1] Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark. [2] Molecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hanis Nazihah Hasmad
- Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Sime Darby Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Mat Adenan Noor Azmi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Malaya Medical Centre, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- 1] Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Sime Darby Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Malaysia. [2] University Malaya Cancer Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yin-Ling Woo
- 1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Malaya Medical Centre, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [2] University Malaya Cancer Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Brooke L Fridley
- Biostatistics and Informatics Shared Resource, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Julie M Cunningham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Fiona Bruinsma
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dong Liang
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Xifeng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maria Bisogna
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Edwin S Iversen
- Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- 1] Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA. [2] Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Patrick Concannon
- 1] Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. [2] Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Rachel Palmieri Weber
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel W Cramer
- 1] Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- 1] Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Poole
- 1] Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- 1] Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Irene Orlow
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Epidemiology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sara H Olson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Epidemiology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Camilla Krakstad
- 1] Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. [2] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Helga B Salvesen
- 1] Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. [2] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ingvild L Tangen
- 1] Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. [2] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Line Bjorge
- 1] Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. [2] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Anne M van Altena
- Department of Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Katja K H Aben
- 1] Comprehensive Cancer Center The Netherlands, Utrecht, the Netherlands. [2] Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- 1] Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. [2] Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Melissa Kellar
- 1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. [2] Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Angela Brooks-Wilson
- 1] Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. [2] Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Clinic of Opthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Hannah Yang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jolanta Lissowska
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Louise A Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Claus Hogdall
- Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lene Lundvall
- Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lotte Nedergaard
- Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helen Baker
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Honglin Song
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Diana Eccles
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Ian McNeish
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, UK
| | - James Paul
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Karen Carty
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nadeem Siddiqui
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rosalind Glasspool
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Health Research and Policy-Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Department of Health Research and Policy-Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Health Research and Policy-Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Health Research and Policy-Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Bu-Tian Ji
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Barry Rosen
- 1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [2] Department of Gynecologic-Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - John R McLaughlin
- Prosserman Centre for Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alvaro N Monteiro
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ann Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Hui-Yi Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jenny Permuth-Wey
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Thomas A Sellers
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ya-Yu Tsai
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Zhihua Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- Women's Cancer, University College London Elizabeth Garrett Anderson (EGA) Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
| | - Usha Menon
- Women's Cancer, University College London Elizabeth Garrett Anderson (EGA) Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
| | - Patricia Harrington
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alice W Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Gerry Coetzee
- 1] Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. [2] Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Malcolm C Pike
- 1] Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. [2] Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Agnieszka Timorek
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Warsaw Medical University and Brodnowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Iwona K Rzepecka
- Department of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
- Department of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Matt Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Houtan Noushmehr
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- 1] Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. [2] Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Simon Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Paul P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Elg1, a central player in genome stability. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH 2014; 763:267-79. [PMID: 25795125 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2014.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2014] [Revised: 11/15/2014] [Accepted: 11/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
ELG1 is a conserved gene uncovered in a number of genetic screens in yeast aimed at identifying factors important in the maintenance of genome stability. Elg1's activity prevents gross chromosomal rearrangements, maintains proper telomere length regulation, helps repairing DNA damage created by a number of genotoxins and participates in sister chromatid cohesion. Elg1 is evolutionarily conserved, and its mammalian ortholog (also known as ATAD5) is embryonic lethal when lost in mice, acts as a tumor suppressor in mice and humans, exhibits physical interactions with components of the human Fanconi Anemia pathway and may be responsible for some of the phenotypes associated with neurofibromatosis. In this review, we summarize the information available on Elg1-related activities in yeast and mammals, and present models to explain how the different phenotypes observed in the absence of Elg1 activity are related.
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
A method is presented to measure homologous recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells by both gene targeting and short-tract gene conversion of a double-strand break (DSB). A fluorescence-based reporter is first gene targeted to the Hprt locus in a quantifiable way. A homing endonuclease expression vector is then introduced to generate a DSB, the repair of which is also quantifiable.
Collapse
|
30
|
A genetic screen based on in vivo RNA imaging reveals centrosome-independent mechanisms for localizing gurken transcripts in Drosophila. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS 2014; 4:749-60. [PMID: 24531791 PMCID: PMC4059244 DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.010462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
We have screened chromosome arm 3L for ethyl methanesulfonate−induced mutations that disrupt localization of fluorescently labeled gurken (grk) messenger (m)RNA, whose transport along microtubules establishes both major body axes of the developing Drosophila oocyte. Rapid identification of causative mutations by single-nucleotide polymorphism recombinational mapping and whole-genomic sequencing allowed us to define nine complementation groups affecting grk mRNA localization and other aspects of oogenesis, including alleles of elg1, scaf6, quemao, nudE, Tsc2/gigas, rasp, and Chd5/Wrb, and several null alleles of the armitage Piwi-pathway gene. Analysis of a newly induced kinesin light chain allele shows that kinesin motor activity is required for both efficient grk mRNA localization and oocyte centrosome integrity. We also show that initiation of the dorsoanterior localization of grk mRNA precedes centrosome localization, suggesting that microtubule self-organization contributes to breaking axial symmetry to generate a unique dorsoventral axis.
Collapse
|
31
|
Jacq X, Kemp M, Martin NMB, Jackson SP. Deubiquitylating enzymes and DNA damage response pathways. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014; 67:25-43. [PMID: 23712866 PMCID: PMC3756857 DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9635-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Covalent post-translational modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like factors has emerged as a general mechanism to regulate myriad intra-cellular processes. The addition and removal of ubiquitin or ubiquitin-like proteins from factors has recently been demonstrated as a key mechanism to modulate DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. It is thus, timely to evaluate the potential for ubiquitin pathway enzymes as DDR drug targets for therapeutic intervention. The synthetic lethal approach provides exciting opportunities for the development of targeted therapies to treat cancer: most tumours have lost critical DDR pathways, and thus rely more heavily on the remaining pathways, while normal tissues are still equipped with all DDR pathways. Here, we review key deubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs) involved in DDR pathways, and describe how targeting DUBs may lead to selective therapies to treat cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Jacq
- MISSION Therapeutics Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Smith S, Fox J, Mejia M, Ruangpradit W, Saberi A, Kim S, Choi Y, Oh S, Wang Y, Choi K, Li L, Hendrickson EA, Takeda S, Muller M, Myung K. Histone deacetylase inhibitors selectively target homology dependent DNA repair defective cells and elevate non-homologous endjoining activity. PLoS One 2014; 9:e87203. [PMID: 24466340 PMCID: PMC3900704 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2013] [Accepted: 12/27/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We have previously used the ATAD5-luciferase high-throughput screening assay to identify genotoxic compounds with potential chemotherapeutic capabilities. The successful identification of known genotoxic agents, including the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) trichostatin A (TSA), confirmed the specificity of the screen since TSA has been widely studied for its ability to cause apoptosis in cancer cells. Because many cancers have acquired mutations in DNA damage checkpoints or repair pathways, we hypothesized that these cancers may be susceptible to treatments that target compensatory pathways. Here, we used a panel of isogenic chicken DT40 B lymphocyte mutant and human cell lines to investigate the ability of TSA to define selective pathways that promote HDACi toxicity. Results HDACi induced a DNA damage response and reduced viability in all repair deficient DT40 mutants although ATM-nulls were least affected. The most dramatic sensitivity was observed in mutants lacking the homology dependent repair (HDR) factor BLM or the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and HDR factors, KU/RAD54, suggesting an involvement of either HDR or NHEJ in HDACi-induced cell death. To extend these findings, we measured the frequencies of HDR and NHEJ after HDACi treatment and monitored viability in human cell lines comparably deficient in HDR or NHEJ. Although no difference in HDR frequency was observed between HDACi treated and untreated cells, HDR-defective human cell lines were clearly more sensitive than wild type. Unexpectedly, cells treated with HDACis showed a significantly elevated NHEJ frequency. Conclusions HDACi targeting drugs induced significant increases in NHEJ activity in human cell lines but did not alter HDR frequency. Moreover, HDR is required for cellular resistance to HDACi therapy; therefore, NHEJ does not appear to be a critical axis for HDACi resistance. Rather, HDACi compounds induced DNA damage, most likely double strand breaks (DSBs), and HDR proficiency is correlated with cell survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Smith
- Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Fox
- Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Marco Mejia
- Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States of America
| | - Wanvipa Ruangpradit
- Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States of America
| | - Alihossein Saberi
- Department of Radiation Genetics Kyoto University, Medical School, Kyoto, 606-8501 Japan
| | - Sunmi Kim
- Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Genetics Kyoto University, Medical School, Kyoto, 606-8501 Japan
- Department of Environmental Health School of Public Hearth, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yongjun Choi
- Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sehyun Oh
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Yucai Wang
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston Texas, United States of America
| | - Kyungho Choi
- Department of Environmental Health School of Public Hearth, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Eric A. Hendrickson
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Shunichi Takeda
- Department of Radiation Genetics Kyoto University, Medical School, Kyoto, 606-8501 Japan
| | - Mark Muller
- Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States of America
| | - Kyungjae Myung
- Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bajrami I, Frankum JR, Konde A, Miller RE, Rehman FL, Brough R, Campbell J, Sims D, Rafiq R, Hooper S, Chen L, Kozarewa I, Assiotis I, Fenwick K, Natrajan R, Lord CJ, Ashworth A. Genome-wide profiling of genetic synthetic lethality identifies CDK12 as a novel determinant of PARP1/2 inhibitor sensitivity. Cancer Res 2013; 74:287-97. [PMID: 24240700 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-2541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 289] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Small-molecule inhibitors of PARP1/2, such as olaparib, have been proposed to serve as a synthetic lethal therapy for cancers that harbor BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Indeed, in clinical trials, PARP1/2 inhibitors elicit sustained antitumor responses in patients with germline BRCA gene mutations. In hypothesizing that additional genetic determinants might direct use of these drugs, we conducted a genome-wide synthetic lethal screen for candidate olaparib sensitivity genes. In support of this hypothesis, the set of identified genes included known determinants of olaparib sensitivity, such as BRCA1, RAD51, and Fanconi's anemia susceptibility genes. In addition, the set included genes implicated in established networks of DNA repair, DNA cohesion, and chromatin remodeling, none of which were known previously to confer sensitivity to PARP1/2 inhibition. Notably, integration of the list of candidate sensitivity genes with data from tumor DNA sequencing studies identified CDK12 deficiency as a clinically relevant biomarker of PARP1/2 inhibitor sensitivity. In models of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGS-OVCa), CDK12 attenuation was sufficient to confer sensitivity to PARP1/2 inhibition, suppression of DNA repair via homologous recombination, and reduced expression of BRCA1. As one of only nine genes known to be significantly mutated in HGS-OVCa, CDK12 has properties that should confirm interest in its use as a biomarker, particularly in ongoing clinical trials of PARP1/2 inhibitors and other agents that trigger replication fork arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilirjana Bajrami
- Authors' Affiliations: The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory, Functional Genomics Laboratory, Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, and Tumour Profiling Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Shiomi Y, Nishitani H. Alternative replication factor C protein, Elg1, maintains chromosome stability by regulating PCNA levels on chromatin. Genes Cells 2013; 18:946-59. [PMID: 23937667 DOI: 10.1111/gtc.12087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2013] [Accepted: 07/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is loaded on chromatin upon initiation of the S phase and acts as a platform for a large number of proteins involved in chromosome duplication at the replication fork. As duplication is completed, PCNA dissociates from chromatin, and thus, chromatin-bound PCNA levels are regulated during the cell cycle. Although the mechanism of PCNA loading has been extensively investigated, the unloading mechanism has remained unclear. Here, we show that Elg1, an alternative replication factor C protein, is required for the regulation of chromatin-bound PCNA levels. When Elg1 was depleted by small interfering RNA, chromatin-bound PCNA levels were extremely increased during the S phase. The number of PCNA foci, regions in the nucleus normally representing DNA replication sites, was increased and PCNA remained on chromatin after DNA replication. Various chromatin-associated protein levels on chromatin were affected, and chromatin loop size was increased. During mitosis, cells with aberrant chromosomes and lagging chromosomes were frequently detected. Our findings suggest that Elg1 has an important role in maintaining chromosome integrity by regulating PCNA levels on chromatin, thereby acting as a PCNA unloading factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasushi Shiomi
- Graduate School of Life Science, University of Hyogo, Kamigori, Ako-gun, Hyogo, 678-1297, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kubota T, Myung K, Donaldson AD. Is PCNA unloading the central function of the Elg1/ATAD5 replication factor C-like complex? Cell Cycle 2013; 12:2570-9. [PMID: 23907118 PMCID: PMC3865047 DOI: 10.4161/cc.25626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Maintaining genome stability is crucial for all cells. The budding yeast Elg1 protein, the major subunit of a replication factor C-like complex, is important for genome stability, since cells lacking Elg1 exhibit increased recombination and chromosomal rearrangements. This genome maintenance function of Elg1 seems to be conserved in higher eukaryotes, since removal of the human Elg1 homolog, encoded by the ATAD5 gene, also causes genome instability leading to tumorigenesis. The fundamental molecular function of the Elg1/ATAD5-replication factor C-like complex (RLC) was, until recently, elusive, although Elg1/ATAD5-RLC was known to interact with the replication sliding clamp PCNA. Two papers have now reported that following DNA replication, the Elg1/ATAD5-RLC is required to remove PCNA from chromatin in yeast and human cells. In this Review, we summarize the evidence that Elg1/ATAD5-RLC acts as a PCNA unloader and discuss the still enigmatic relationship between the function of Elg1/ATAD5-RLC in PCNA unloading and the role of Elg1/ATAD5 in maintaining genomic stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Kubota
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ulrich HD. New insights into replication clamp unloading. J Mol Biol 2013; 425:4727-32. [PMID: 23688817 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2013] [Revised: 05/08/2013] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The sliding clamp protein proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is situated at the core of the eukaryotic replisome, where it acts as an interaction scaffold for numerous replication and repair factors and coordinates DNA transactions ranging from Okazaki fragment maturation to chromatin assembly and mismatch repair. PCNA is loaded onto DNA by a dedicated complex, the replication factor C, whose mechanism has been studied in detail. Until recently, however, it was unclear how PCNA is removed from DNA upon completion of DNA synthesis. Two complementary studies now present data strongly implicating the replication factor C-like complex, Elg1/ATAD5-RLC, in the unloading of PCNA during replication in yeast and human cells. They indicate that an appropriate control over PCNA's residence on the chromatin is important for maintaining genome stability. At the same time, they suggest that the interaction of Elg1/ATAD5 with SUMO, which was also reported to contribute to its role in genome maintenance, affects aspects of its function distinct from its unloading activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helle D Ulrich
- Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, Clare Hall Laboratories, Blanche Lane, South Mimms EN6 3LD, United Kingdom; Institute of Molecular Biology, Ackermannweg 4, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Singh S, Shemesh K, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M. Genetic and physical interactions between the yeast ELG1 gene and orthologs of the Fanconi anemia pathway. Cell Cycle 2013; 12:1625-36. [PMID: 23624835 PMCID: PMC3680542 DOI: 10.4161/cc.24756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a human syndrome characterized by genomic instability and increased incidence of cancer. FA is a genetically heterogeneous disease caused by mutations in at least 15 different genes; several of these genes are conserved in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Elg1 is also a conserved protein that forms an RFC-like complex, which interacts with SUMOylated PCNA. The mammalian Elg1 protein has been recently found to interact with the FA complex. Here we analyze the genetic interactions between elg1Δand mutants of the yeast FA-like pathway. We show that Elg1 physically contacts the Mhf1/Mhf2 histone-like complex and genetically interacts with MPH1 (ortholog of the FANCM helicase) and CHL1 (ortholog of the FANCJ helicase) genes. We analyze the sensitivity of double, triple, quadruple and quintuple mutants to methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) and to hydroxyurea (HU). Our results show that genetic interactions depend on the type of DNA damaging agent used and show a hierarchy: Chl1 and Elg1 play major roles in the survival to these genotoxins and exhibit synthetic fitness reduction. Mph1 plays a lesser role, and the effect of the Mhf1/2 complex is seen only in the absence of Elg1 on HU-containing medium. Finally, we dissect the relationship between yeast FA-like mutants and the replication clamp, PCNA. Our results point to an intricate network of interactions rather than a single, linear repair pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Singh
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tosato V, Sidari S, Bruschi CV. Bridge-induced chromosome translocation in yeast relies upon a Rad54/Rdh54-dependent, Pol32-independent pathway. PLoS One 2013; 8:e60926. [PMID: 23613757 PMCID: PMC3629078 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2012] [Accepted: 03/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
While in mammalian cells the genetic determinism of chromosomal translocation remains unclear, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has become an ideal model system to generate ad hoc translocations and analyze their cellular and molecular outcome. A linear DNA cassette carrying a selectable marker flanked by perfect homologies to two chromosomes triggers a bridge-induced translocation (BIT) in budding yeast, with variable efficiency. A postulated two-step process to produce BIT translocants is based on the cooperation between the Homologous Recombination System (HRS) and Break-Induced Replication (BIR); however, a clear indication of the molecular factors underlying the genetic mechanism is still missing. In this work we provide evidence that BIT translocation is elicited by the Rad54 helicase and completed by a Pol32-independent replication pathway. Our results demonstrate also that Rdh54 is involved in the stability of the translocants, suggesting a mitotic role in chromosome pairing and segregation. Moreover, when RAD54 is over-expressed, an ensemble of secondary rearrangements between repeated DNA tracts arise after the initial translocation event, leading to severe aneuploidy with loss of genetic material, which prompts the identification of fragile sites within the yeast genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Tosato
- Yeast Molecular Genetics Laboratory, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lee KY, Fu H, Aladjem MI, Myung K. ATAD5 regulates the lifespan of DNA replication factories by modulating PCNA level on the chromatin. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 200:31-44. [PMID: 23277426 PMCID: PMC3542800 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201206084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Reduction of ATAD5 extends the lifespan of replication factories by retaining PCNA and other replisome proteins on chromatin, leading to an increase in inactive replication factories and reduced overall replication rate. Temporal and spatial regulation of the replication factory is important for efficient DNA replication. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are not well understood. Here, we report that ATAD5 regulates the lifespan of replication factories. Reduced expression of ATAD5 extended the lifespan of replication factories by retaining proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and other replisome proteins on the chromatin during and even after DNA synthesis. This led to an increase of inactive replication factories with an accumulation of replisome proteins. Consequently, the overall replication rate was decreased, which resulted in the delay of S-phase progression. Prevalent detection of PCNA foci in G2 phase cells after ATAD5 depletion suggests that defects in the disassembly of replication factories persist after S phase is complete. ATAD5-mediated regulation of the replication factory and PCNA required an intact ATAD5 ATPase domain. Taken together, our data imply that ATAD5 regulates the cycle of DNA replication factories, probably through its PCNA-unloading activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyoo-young Lee
- Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sharma S, Helchowski CM, Canman CE. The roles of DNA polymerase ζ and the Y family DNA polymerases in promoting or preventing genome instability. Mutat Res 2012. [PMID: 23195997 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2012.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Cancer cells display numerous abnormal characteristics which are initiated and maintained by elevated mutation rates and genome instability. Chromosomal DNA is continuously surveyed for the presence of damage or blocked replication forks by the DNA Damage Response (DDR) network. The DDR is complex and includes activation of cell cycle checkpoints, DNA repair, gene transcription, and induction of apoptosis. Duplicating a damaged genome is associated with elevated risks to fork collapse and genome instability. Therefore, the DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathway is also employed to enhance survival and involves the recruitment of translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) polymerases to sites of replication fork blockade or single stranded DNA gaps left after the completion of replication in order to restore DNA to its double stranded form before mitosis. TLS polymerases are specialized for inserting nucleotides opposite DNA adducts, abasic sites, or DNA crosslinks. By definition, the DDT pathway is not involved in the actual repair of damaged DNA, but provides a mechanism to tolerate DNA lesions during replication thereby increasing survival and lessening the chance for genome instability. However this may be associated with increased mutagenesis. In this review, we will describe the specialized functions of Y family polymerases (Rev1, Polη, Polι and Polκ) and DNA polymerase ζ in lesion bypass, mutagenesis, and prevention of genome instability, the latter due to newly appreciated roles in DNA repair. The recently described role of the Fanconi anemia pathway in regulating Rev1 and Polζ-dependent TLS is also discussed in terms of their involvement in TLS, interstrand crosslink repair, and homologous recombination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpy Sharma
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Corey M Helchowski
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Christine E Canman
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fox JT, Myung K. Cell-based high-throughput screens for the discovery of chemotherapeutic agents. Oncotarget 2012; 3:581-5. [PMID: 22653910 PMCID: PMC3388188 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
With modern advances in robotics and data processing, high-throughput screening (HTS) is playing an increasingly growing role in the drug discovery process. The ultimate success of HTS depends upon the development of assays that are robust and reproducible in miniaturized formats, have low false-positive rates, and can identify drugs that offer improvements over those currently on the market. One example of such an assay is the ATAD5-luciferase HTS assay, which identified three antioxidants that could kill cancer cells without inducing mutagenesis. Here we discuss the ATAD5-luciferase assay and expand upon the value of HTS in identifying other potential cancer drugs, focusing on cell-based assays that involve DNA damage or repair pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer T Fox
- Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
High-throughput genotoxicity assay identifies antioxidants as inducers of DNA damage response and cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:5423-8. [PMID: 22431602 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114278109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Human ATAD5 is a biomarker for identifying genotoxic compounds because ATAD5 protein levels increase posttranscriptionally in response to DNA damage. We screened over 4,000 compounds with a cell-based quantitative high-throughput ATAD5-luciferase assay detecting genotoxic compounds. We identified 22 antioxidants, including resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein, that are currently used or investigated for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, osteopenia, osteoporosis, and chronic hepatitis, as well as for antiaging. Treatment of dividing cells with these compounds induced DNA damage and resulted in cell death. Despite their genotoxic effects, resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein did not cause mutagenesis, which is a major side effect of conventional anticancer drugs. Furthermore, resveratrol and genistein killed multidrug-resistant cancer cells. We therefore propose that resveratrol, genistein, and baicalein are attractive candidates for improved chemotherapeutic agents.
Collapse
|
43
|
Endogenous DNA replication stress results in expansion of dNTP pools and a mutator phenotype. EMBO J 2012; 31:895-907. [PMID: 22234187 DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2011] [Accepted: 12/09/2011] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The integrity of the genome depends on diverse pathways that regulate DNA metabolism. Defects in these pathways result in genome instability, a hallmark of cancer. Deletion of ELG1 in budding yeast, when combined with hypomorphic alleles of PCNA results in spontaneous DNA damage during S phase that elicits upregulation of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) activity. Increased RNR activity leads to a dramatic expansion of deoxyribonucleotide (dNTP) pools in G1 that allows cells to synthesize significant fractions of the genome in the presence of hydroxyurea in the subsequent S phase. Consistent with the recognized correlation between dNTP levels and spontaneous mutation, compromising ELG1 and PCNA results in a significant increase in mutation rates. Deletion of distinct genome stability genes RAD54, RAD55, and TSA1 also results in increased dNTP levels and mutagenesis, suggesting that this is a general phenomenon. Together, our data point to a vicious circle in which mutations in gatekeeper genes give rise to genomic instability during S phase, inducing expansion of the dNTP pool, which in turn results in high levels of spontaneous mutagenesis.
Collapse
|
44
|
Fox JT, Lee KY, Myung K. Dynamic regulation of PCNA ubiquitylation/deubiquitylation. FEBS Lett 2011; 585:2780-5. [PMID: 21640107 PMCID: PMC3172383 DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2011] [Revised: 05/20/2011] [Accepted: 05/23/2011] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) ubiquitylation plays a crucial role in maintaining genomic stability during DNA replication. DNA damage stalling the DNA replication fork induces PCNA ubiquitylation that activates DNA damage bypass to prevent the collapse of DNA replication forks that could potentially produce double-strand breaks and chromosomal rearrangements. PCNA ubiquitylation dictates the mode of bypass depending on the level of ubiquitylation; monoubiquitylation and polyubiquitylation activate error-prone translesion synthesis and error-free template switching, respectively. Due to the error-prone nature of DNA damage bypass, PCNA ubiquitylation needs to be tightly regulated. Here, we review the molecular mechanisms to remove ubiquitin from PCNA including the emerging role of USP1 and ELG1 in this fascinating process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer T Fox
- Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bell DW, Sikdar N, Lee KY, Price JC, Chatterjee R, Park HD, Fox J, Ishiai M, Rudd ML, Pollock LM, Fogoros SK, Mohamed H, Hanigan CL, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Zhang S, Cruz P, Renaud G, Hansen NF, Cherukuri PF, Borate B, McManus KJ, Stoepel J, Sipahimalani P, Godwin AK, Sgroi DC, Merino MJ, Elliot G, Elkahloun A, Vinson C, Takata M, Mullikin JC, Wolfsberg TG, Hieter P, Lim DS, Myung K. Predisposition to cancer caused by genetic and functional defects of mammalian Atad5. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1002245. [PMID: 21901109 PMCID: PMC3161924 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2011] [Accepted: 06/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
ATAD5, the human ortholog of yeast Elg1, plays a role in PCNA deubiquitination. Since PCNA modification is important to regulate DNA damage bypass, ATAD5 may be important for suppression of genomic instability in mammals in vivo. To test this hypothesis, we generated heterozygous (Atad5(+/m)) mice that were haploinsuffficient for Atad5. Atad5(+/m) mice displayed high levels of genomic instability in vivo, and Atad5(+/m) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) exhibited molecular defects in PCNA deubiquitination in response to DNA damage, as well as DNA damage hypersensitivity and high levels of genomic instability, apoptosis, and aneuploidy. Importantly, 90% of haploinsufficient Atad5(+/m) mice developed tumors, including sarcomas, carcinomas, and adenocarcinomas, between 11 and 20 months of age. High levels of genomic alterations were evident in tumors that arose in the Atad5(+/m) mice. Consistent with a role for Atad5 in suppressing tumorigenesis, we also identified somatic mutations of ATAD5 in 4.6% of sporadic human endometrial tumors, including two nonsense mutations that resulted in loss of proper ATAD5 function. Taken together, our findings indicate that loss-of-function mutations in mammalian Atad5 are sufficient to cause genomic instability and tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne W. Bell
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nilabja Sikdar
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Kyoo-young Lee
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jessica C. Price
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Raghunath Chatterjee
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Hee-Dong Park
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- National Research Laboratory for Genomic Stability, Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jennifer Fox
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Masamichi Ishiai
- Laboratory of DNA Damage Signaling, Department of Late Effect Studies, Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto University, Yoshidakonoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Meghan L. Rudd
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Lana M. Pollock
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sarah K. Fogoros
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Hassan Mohamed
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Christin L. Hanigan
- Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Suiyuan Zhang
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Pedro Cruz
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Gabriel Renaud
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nancy F. Hansen
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Praveen F. Cherukuri
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Bhavesh Borate
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Kirk J. McManus
- Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jan Stoepel
- Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Payal Sipahimalani
- Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Andrew K. Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America
| | - Dennis C. Sgroi
- Molecular Pathology Unit and Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Maria J. Merino
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Gene Elliot
- Genetic Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Abdel Elkahloun
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Charles Vinson
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Minoru Takata
- Laboratory of DNA Damage Signaling, Department of Late Effect Studies, Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto University, Yoshidakonoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - James C. Mullikin
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Tyra G. Wolfsberg
- Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Philip Hieter
- Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Dae-Sik Lim
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- National Research Laboratory for Genomic Stability, Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Kyungjae Myung
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Calvo KR, Vinh DC, Maric I, Wang W, Noel P, Stetler-Stevenson M, Arthur DC, Raffeld M, Dutra A, Pak E, Myung K, Hsu AP, Hickstein DD, Pittaluga S, Holland SM. Myelodysplasia in autosomal dominant and sporadic monocytopenia immunodeficiency syndrome: diagnostic features and clinical implications. Haematologica 2011; 96:1221-5. [PMID: 21508125 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.041152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
A novel, genetic immunodeficiency syndrome has been recently described, herein termed "MonoMAC". It is characterized by severe circulating monocytopenia, NK- and B-lymphocytopenia, severe infections with M. avium complex (MAC), and risk of progression to myelodysplasia/acute myelogenous leukemia. Detailed bone marrow analyses performed on 18 patients further define this disorder. The majority of patients had hypocellular marrows with reticulin fibrosis and multilineage dysplasia affecting the myeloid (72%), erythroid (83%) and megakaryocytic (100%) lineages. Cytogenetic abnormalities were present in 10 of 17 (59%). Despite B-lymphocytopenia, plasma cells were present but were abnormal (e.g. CD56(+)) in nearly half of cases. Increased T-cell large granular lymphocyte populations were present in 28% of patients. Chromosomal breakage studies, cell cycle checkpoint functions, and sequencing of TERT and K-RAS genes revealed no abnormalities. MonoMAC appears to be a unique, inherited syndrome of bone marrow failure. We describe distinctive bone marrow features to help in its recognition and diagnosis. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT00018044, NCT00923364, NCT01212055).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine R Calvo
- Hematology Section, Department of Laboratory Medicine, NIH Clinical Center, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892-1508, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Liu Q, Wang J, Miki D, Xia R, Yu W, He J, Zheng Z, Zhu JK, Gong Z. DNA replication factor C1 mediates genomic stability and transcriptional gene silencing in Arabidopsis. THE PLANT CELL 2010; 22:2336-52. [PMID: 20639449 PMCID: PMC2929113 DOI: 10.1105/tpc.110.076349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2010] [Revised: 06/18/2010] [Accepted: 06/28/2010] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Genetic screening identified a suppressor of ros1-1, a mutant of REPRESSOR OF SILENCING1 (ROS1; encoding a DNA demethylation protein). The suppressor is a mutation in the gene encoding the largest subunit of replication factor C (RFC1). This mutation of RFC1 reactivates the unlinked 35S-NPTII transgene, which is silenced in ros1 and also increases expression of the pericentromeric Athila retrotransposons named transcriptional silent information in a DNA methylation-independent manner. rfc1 is more sensitive than the wild type to the DNA-damaging agent methylmethane sulphonate and to the DNA inter- and intra- cross-linking agent cisplatin. The rfc1 mutant constitutively expresses the G2/M-specific cyclin CycB1;1 and other DNA repair-related genes. Treatment with DNA-damaging agents mimics the rfc1 mutation in releasing the silenced 35S-NPTII, suggesting that spontaneously induced genomic instability caused by the rfc1 mutation might partially contribute to the released transcriptional gene silencing (TGS). The frequency of somatic homologous recombination is significantly increased in the rfc1 mutant. Interestingly, ros1 mutants show increased telomere length, but rfc1 mutants show decreased telomere length and reduced expression of telomerase. Our results suggest that RFC1 helps mediate genomic stability and TGS in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Junguo Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Daisuke Miki
- Institute for Integrative Genome Biology and Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
- Center for Plant Stress Genomics and Technology, 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ran Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Wenxiang Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Junna He
- State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Zhimin Zheng
- Institute for Integrative Genome Biology and Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
- Center for Plant Stress Genomics and Technology, 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Jian-Kang Zhu
- Institute for Integrative Genome Biology and Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
- Center for Plant Stress Genomics and Technology, 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- China Agricultural University–University of California, Riverside Center for Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Zhizhong Gong
- State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
- China Agricultural University–University of California, Riverside Center for Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Beijing 100193, China
- National Center for Plant Gene Research, Beijing 100193, China
- Address correspondence to
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Parnas O, Zipin-Roitman A, Pfander B, Liefshitz B, Mazor Y, Ben-Aroya S, Jentsch S, Kupiec M. Elg1, an alternative subunit of the RFC clamp loader, preferentially interacts with SUMOylated PCNA. EMBO J 2010; 29:2611-22. [PMID: 20571511 DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2010.128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2010] [Accepted: 05/26/2010] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Replication-factor C (RFC) is a protein complex that loads the processivity clamp PCNA onto DNA. Elg1 is a conserved protein with homology to the largest subunit of RFC, but its function remained enigmatic. Here, we show that yeast Elg1 interacts physically and genetically with PCNA, in a manner that depends on PCNA modification, and exhibits preferential affinity for SUMOylated PCNA. This interaction is mediated by three small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-interacting motifs and a PCNA-interacting protein box close to the N-terminus of Elg1. These motifs are important for the ability of Elg1 to maintain genomic stability. SUMOylated PCNA is known to recruit the helicase Srs2, and in the absence of Elg1, Srs2 and SUMOylated PCNA accumulate on chromatin. Strains carrying mutations in both ELG1 and SRS2 exhibit a synthetic fitness defect that depends on PCNA modification. Our results underscore the importance of Elg1, Srs2 and SUMOylated PCNA in the maintenance of genomic stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oren Parnas
- Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lee KY, Yang K, Cohn MA, Sikdar N, D'Andrea AD, Myung K. Human ELG1 regulates the level of ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) through Its interactions with PCNA and USP1. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:10362-9. [PMID: 20147293 PMCID: PMC2856242 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m109.092544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2009] [Revised: 01/28/2010] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The level of monoubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is closely linked with DNA damage bypass to protect cells from a high level of mutagenesis. However, it remains unclear how the level of monoubiquitinated PCNA is regulated. Here, we demonstrate that human ELG1 protein, which comprises an alternative replication factor C (RFC) complex and plays an important role in preserving genomic stability, as an interacting partner for the USP1 (ubiquitin-specific protease 1)-UAF1 (USP1-associated factor 1) complex, a deubiquitinating enzyme complex for PCNA and FANCD2. ELG1 protein interacts with PCNAs that are localized at stalled replication forks. ELG1 knockdown specifically resulted in an increase in the level of PCNA monoubiquitination without affecting the level of FANCD2 ubiquitination. It is a novel function of ELG1 distinct from its role as an alternative RFC complex because knockdowns of any other RFC subunits or other alternative RFCs did not affect PCNA monoubiquitination. Lastly, we identified a highly conserved N-terminal domain in ELG1 that was responsible for the USP1-UAF1 interaction as well as the activity to down-regulate PCNA monoubiquitination. Taken together, ELG1 specifically directs USP1-UAF1 complex for PCNA deubiquitination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyoo-young Lee
- From the
Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 and
| | - Kailin Yang
- the
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| | - Martin A. Cohn
- the
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| | - Nilabja Sikdar
- From the
Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 and
| | - Alan D. D'Andrea
- the
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| | - Kyungjae Myung
- From the
Genome Instability Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 and
| |
Collapse
|