Updates on Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been previously linked to left circulation thromboembolism and stroke. This review article aims to discuss the latest evidence, updated societal guidelines, diagnostic algorithms and novel therapeutic devices for PFO closure.

RECENT FINDINGS

PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke and systemic embolization is supported by a large body of evidence and has a strong societal recommendation. Limited data are available for platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome, although closure appears to be beneficial. Current data do not support routine closure for migraines and decompression Illness. Development of heart-brain teams can improve identification of patients most likely to benefit from closure, utilizing a combination of imaging test and risk score algorithms. Multiple novel devices aiming at reducing complications and improving the long-term impact of current available devices are being evaluated. PFO closure has significantly progressed over the last years, with new data supporting its superiority in reducing risk of recurrent embolic stroke in patients with PFO-related stroke. Additional clinical data are required to provide further refinements on patient selection and guidance on treatment of specific subgroups.

Transcatheter PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke: current approaches and future considerations

Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) is a common congenital atrial septal defect present in 20%-35% of the general population. Although generally considered a benign anatomic variant, a PFO may facilitate passage of a thrombus from the venous to arterial circulation, thereby resulting in cryptogenic stroke or systemic embolization. A PFO is detected in nearly one half of patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke and often considered the most likely etiology when other causes have been excluded. In this review, we discuss the contemporary role of transcatheter closure of PFO in the treatment of cryptogenic stroke, including devices currently available for commercial use in the United States (Amplatzer PFOTM Occluder and GoreTM Cardioform Septal Occluder) and a novel suture-mediated device (NobleStitchTM EL) under clinical investigation. To provide the best care for cryptogenic stroke patients, practitioners should be familiar with the indications for PFO closure and corresponding treatment options.

Atrial Fibrillation After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Incidence, Pathophysiology, and Management

This comprehensive review explores the incidence, pathophysiology, and management of atrial fibrillation (AF) following percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO). Although AF is considered a common adverse event post PFO closure, its incidence, estimated at <5%, varies based on monitoring methods. The review delves into the challenging task of precisely estimating AF incidence, given subclinical AF and diverse diagnostic approaches. Notably, a temporal pattern emerges, with peak incidence around the 14th day after closure and a subsequent decline after the 45th day, mimicking general population AF trends. The pathophysiological mechanisms behind post PFO closure AF remain elusive, with proposed factors including local irritation, device-related interference, tissue stretch, and nickel hypersensitivity. Management considerations encompass rhythm control, with flecainide showing promise, and anticoagulation tailored to individual risk profiles. The authors advocate for a personalized approach, weighing factors like age, comorbidities, and device characteristics. Notably, postclosure AF is generally considered benign, often resolving spontaneously within 45 days, minimizing thromboembolic risks. Further studies are required to refine understanding and provide evidence-based guidelines.

Percutaneous suture-based patent foramen ovale closure: A state-of-the-art review

Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), a common variation of interatrial septum anatomy, is a commonly performed procedure in the catheterization laboratory to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in selected patients and to treat other PFO-related syndromes. In the last twenty years, disc-based devices have represented the armamentarium of the interventional cardiologist; recently, suture-based devices have become an attractive alternative, despite limited data regarding their long-term performance. The present review gives an overview of the current evidence regarding suture-based PFO closure, the device's characteristics, the echocardiographic evaluation of the PFO anatomy, and recommendations for patient selection. A detailed procedural guide is then provided, and potential complications and future developments in the field are discussed.

Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life after Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure in Patients with Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack of Undetermined Cause and Other PFO-Associated Clinical Conditions: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes and quality of life after PFO closure in patients with previous stroke/TIA of undetermined cause and in patients with other complex PFO-associated clinical conditions.

METHODS

Between July 2009 and December 2019 at our University Cardiology Department, 118 consecutive patients underwent a thorough diagnostic work-up including standardized history taking, clinical evaluation, full neurological examination, screening for thrombophilia, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound-Doppler sonography of supra-aortic vessels and 24 h ECG Holter monitoring. Anatomo-morphological evaluation using 2D transthoracic/transesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE) color Doppler and functional assessment using contrast TTE (cTTE) in the apical four-chamber view and contrast transcranial Doppler (cTCD) using power M-mode modality were performed to verify the presence, location and amount of right-to-left shunting via PFO or other extracardiac source. Completed questionnaires based on the Quality-of-Life Short Form-36 (QoL SF-36) and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) were obtained from the patients before PFO closure and after 12 months. Contrast TTE/TEE and cTCD were performed at dismission, 1, 6 and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Brain MRI was performed at 1-year follow-up in 54 patients.

RESULTS

Transcatheter PFO closure was performed in 106 selected symptomatic patients (mean age 41.7 ± 10.7 years, range 16-63, 65% women) with the following conditions: ischemic stroke (n = 23), transient ischemic attack (n = 22), peripheral and coronary embolism (n = 2), MRI lesions without cerebrovascular clinical events (n = 53), platypnea-orthodeoxia (n = 1), decompression sickness (n = 1) and refractory migraine without ischemic cerebral lesions (n = 4). The implanted devices were Occlutech Figulla Flex I/II PFO (n = 99), Occlutech UNI (n = 3), Amplatzer PFO (n = 3) and CeraFlex PFO occluders (n = 1). Procedures were performed under local anesthesia and rotational intracardiac monitoring (Ultra ICE) alone. The devices were correctly implanted in all patients. The mean fluoroscopy time was 15 ± 5 min (range = 10-45 min) and the mean procedural time was 55 ± 20 min (range = 35-90 min). The total occlusion rate at follow-up (mean 50 months, range 3-100) was 98.1%. No recurrent neurological events were observed in the long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The data collected in this study demonstrate that percutaneous PFO closure is a safe and effective procedure, showing long-term prevention of recurrent cerebrovascular events, significant reduction in migraine symptoms and substantial improvement in quality of life.

A new echocardiographic index to select patients for PFO suture-mediated percutaneous closure

OBJECTIVES

To identify a simple echocardiographic predictor of procedural success to select patient for percutaneous suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis (PFO) closure.

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous suture-mediated PFO closure has been shown as a safe and advantageous alternative to device-based PFO closure, yet its overall success is slightly lower in unselected patients.

METHODS

Preprocedural transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) of 302 patients (113 men, 45 ± 12 years) who underwent percutaneous suture-mediated PFO closure were reviewed.

RESULTS

At echocardiographic follow-up (3-6 months), residual right-to-left shunt (RLS) ≥2 was found in 60 (19.9%) patients. At multivariable analysis, only two anatomical variables measured at preprocedural TEE were found as independent predictors of residual RLS ≥ 2 at follow-up: PFO maximum width (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-3.40, p = 0.02) and PFO minimal septa overlapping (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.88, p = 0.02). An index based on the ratio of PFO maximum width to PFO minimum septal overlapping (W/SO) proved to be the most powerful predictor of RLS ≥ 2 at follow-up (OR 48.1, 95% CI 9.3-352.2, p < 0.01). The ROC curve for the W/SO ratio was found to have an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.93) and a cut-off value of 0.61 yielding a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 78% with a negative predictive value of 94%. A decision tree methodology's AUC was 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the ratio between the maximum amplitude of the PFO and the minimum overlap of the septa is the best predictive index of a favorable result by using one stitch only.

Noblestitch® system for PFO closure: A novel but judicious alternative to traditional devices—A case report

Background

Percutaneous suture-mediated patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure has recently been used with the aim of avoiding double-disc nitinol device implantation. This novel technique has been carried out successfully in several centers offering PFO closure with an effective closure rate comparable to conventional double-disc devices.

Case summary

A 50-year-old man, a pentathlon athlete, suffering from a previous left-sided ischemic stroke, underwent percutaneous closure of a permanent right-to-left shunt via PFO with a large fenestrated septum primum aneurysm at another institution. The NobleStitch® system was successfully implanted using local anesthesia and under angiographic-fluoroscopic monitoring. He was discharged home on aspirin 100 mg daily with a moderate residual shunt on contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE) that persisted unaltered at subsequent controls. After 7 months, unable to resume sporting activity because of physical discomfort and dyspnea on exertion, the patient asked for a second opinion at our Heart and Brain clinic. Two-dimensional (2D) TTE showed septum primum laceration next to a radiopaque polypropylene knot with a moderate bidirectional shunt located at the fenestrated septum primum far from the PFO site. A catheter-based closure of the septal defect was therefore planned under local anesthesia and rotational intracardiac echo monitoring. An equally sized discs 28.5 mm × 28.5 mm Flex II UNI occluder (Occlutech GmbH, Jena, Germany) was successfully implanted across the atrial septal defect without complications. The patient was discharged in good clinical conditions; dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 100 mg/daily and clopidogrel 75 mg/daily) was recommended for 2 months and then single antiplatelet therapy (aspirin100 mg/daily) up to 6 months. Abolition of the residual shunt was confirmed at 1- and 6-month follow-up by contrast transcranial Doppler and 2D color Doppler cTTE.

Discussion

Closing a PFO with a suture-base system, without leaving a device implant behind, may be a cutting-edge technology and potential alternative to traditional devices. Nevertheless, meticulous selection of the PFO anatomies by 2D TEE is key to a successful closure procedure in order to avoid complications that must be managed again with a second percutaneous procedure or by surgery.

Atrial function analysis after percutaneous umbrella device and suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis closure

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is an undesirable event following percutaneous patent fossa ovalis (PFO) closure with metallic occluders, suggesting that implanting a rigid closure device could alter atrial function. Suture-mediated PFO closure is a new technique, achieving closure of the PFO by means of a simple suture. Aim of this study was to evaluate left atrial function after closure of PFO by direct suture and traditional occluders.

METHODS

We studied 40 age and sex homogeneous patients, 20 undergoing PFO closure by device (OCL) and 20 by suturing (NS). Twenty healthy sex-age matched subjects made up the control group (CT). Left atrial function was evaluated by using volumetric and speckle-tracking analysis assessing the following parameters: total emptying fraction (EF), Expansion Index (EI), active emptying fraction (AEF), strain values of the reservoir (r-ED), conduit (cd-ED) and contraction phase (ct-ED).

RESULTS

Compared to CT and NS, OCL patients had significantly worst indices of left atrial reservoir function (EF P=0.001, EI P=0.003, r-ED P<0.001), conduit function (cd-ED P=0.018) and contraction function (AEF P=0.010; ct-ED P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in left atrial function indices between CT and NS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Suture-mediated PFO closure does not alter left atrial function. Conversely, metallic occluder is associated with worse left atrium function. This detrimental effect on atrial function could favor the development of atrial arrhythmias.

Traumatic Atrial Septal Defect Repair via Primary Endovascular Suture Method: Case Report and Operative Technique

We report a case of a 20-year-old male with no prior medical history who was found to have an atrial septal defect on echocardiography following a motor vehicle accident (MVA). The patient underwent primary percutaneous defect closure using the NobleStitch EL (Heartstitch, Fountain Valley, California) cardiovascular suturing system with intra-operative Doppler echocardiogram showing no residual shunt or color flow. There were no operative complications. At five months follow-up, the patient reported no symptoms from the procedure. In the case of traumatic atrial septal defect repair, the NobleStitch EL system may be utilized as an alternative to open heart surgery.

A new era in patent foramen ovale closure - a percutaneous suture-based 'deviceless' technique (NobleStitch®): Experience of a Portuguese center

INTRODUCTION

In patients with cryptogenic stroke, one of the most frequently found abnormalities is patent foramen ovale (PFO). Percutaneous 'deviceless' systems based on surgical suture-mediated PFO closure have recently been introduced and show a favorable efficacy and safety profile with clear advantages.

OBJECTIVES

To present procedural details of the technique and baseline characteristics of patients who underwent the procedure in our center.

METHODS

A single-center prospective observational registry was established between February 2020 and February 2021, to assess the safety, efficacy and possible advantages of a novel percutaneous PFO closure system (NobleStitch® EL). Patient and PFO characteristics as well as technical features were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were considered suitable for this technique after transesophageal echocardiography. Their mean age was 51 years and 69.5% were women. Most patients (91.3%) had a history of cryptogenic stroke. PFO closure with the NobleStitch® system was successfully performed in all patients. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia and fluoroscopic monitoring. The mean duration of the procedure was 52 min and median contrast dose used was 187 ml. Median radiation dose absorbed per patient was 61.5 Gy cm². All patients were discharged asymptomatic 24 hours after the procedure with no peri- or postprocedural complications recorded.

CONCLUSION

Suture-mediated PFO closure represents a valid and safe alternative to traditional umbrella-like devices, and is feasible in the majority of PFO anatomies. Follow-up information, results of larger series and clinical trials may possibly validate this technique as the first choice for PFO closure.

Recent advances in catheter devices for patent foramen ovale closure

INTRODUCTION

Over the last 5 years, the armamentarium of the interventional cardiologist dealing with percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been enriched by some novel devices and further improvements of existing ones that have or promise to increase the safety and effective closure rate of PFO patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents and discusses recent advancements in device design and composition from both technical and clinical perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Device technology is continuously evolving. The recent modification of delivery system, device hooking, and composition, as well as the advent of new bioabsorbable materials, is promising to make percutaneous PFO closure devices safer. The search for more effectiveness with possibly less metal behind is still ongoing.

Advances in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: From the Procedure to the Echocardiographic Guidance

Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure by traditional, double disc occluder devices was shown to be safe for patients with PFO, and more effective than prolonged medical therapy in preventing recurrent thromboembolic events. The novel suture-mediated “deviceless” PFO closure system overcomes most of the risks and limitations associated with the traditional PFO occluders, appearing to be feasible in most interatrial septum anatomies, even if data about its long-term effectiveness and safety are still lacking. The aim of the present review was to provide to the reader the state of the art about the traditional and newer techniques of PFO closure, focusing both on the procedural aspects and on the pivotal role of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patient’s selection, peri-procedural guidance, and post-interventional follow-up.

Suture-Mediated Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Using the NobleStitch EL: Results from a Hospital-Based HTA

(1) Background: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a congenital abnormality present in up to 25% of the general population, and it is a relevant cause of cryptogenic stroke. We applied the hospital-based HTA model (AdHopHTA) to conduct a multidimensional assessment of NobleStitch EL, an innovative suture-mediated PFO closure device. We compared it to Amplatzer PFO Occluder (APO) to provide evidence to inform technologies’ governance in hospital settings. (2) Methods: For each AdHopHTA dimension we: systematically retrieved available evidence from the literature applying the PRISMA guidelines and then analyzed original clinical and cost data of a NobleStitch EL device at San Raffaele research hospital in Milan (Italy). The economic dimension was analyzed through activity-based costing and a cost analysis. We conducted semi-structured interviews with selected healthcare professionals to explore the organizational, legal, social, and ethical impact. (3) Results: A single study was included for the NobleStitch EL, with 10 for APO. Both literature data and original data showed comparable safety. Efficacy data analysis found that the PFO closure was at 89% for NobleStitch EL vs. 89–97% for APO. APO has a better impact on the budget and minor process costs. Consulted experts reported that the organizational impact of NobleStitch EL in the short and the long run as null, albeit a better impact under the social and the ethical aspects. (4) Conclusion: We suggest that there is inadequate evidence to conclude the relative efficacy of NobleStitch EL as compared to APO. Nevertheless, this report shows a good safety profile and higher costs for NobleStitch EL, with no organizational or legal impact. Further studies in selected population are recommended.

Teleproctoring for Training in Structural Heart Interventions: Initial Real-World Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background

Proctoring represents a cornerstone in the acquisition of state‐of‐the‐art cardiovascular interventions. Yet, travel restrictions and containment measures during the COVID‐19 pandemic limited on‐site proctoring for training and expert support in interventional cardiology.

Methods and Results

We established a teleproctoring setup for training in a novel patent foramen ovale closure device system (NobleStitch EL, HeartStitch Inc, Fountain Valley, CA) at our institution using web‐based real‐time bidirectional audiovisual communication. A total of 6 patients with prior paradoxical embolic stroke and a right‐to‐left shunt of grade 2 or 3 were treated under remote proctorship after 3 cases were performed successfully under on‐site proctorship. No major device/procedure‐related adverse events occurred, and none of the patients had a residual right‐to‐left shunt of grade 1 or higher after the procedure. Additionally, we sought to provide an overview of current evidence available for teleproctoring in interventional cardiology. Literature review was performed identifying 6 previous reports on teleproctoring for cardiovascular interventions, most of which were related to the current COVID‐19 pandemic. In all reports, teleproctoring was carried out in similar settings with comparable setups; no major adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

Teleproctoring may represent a feasible and safe tool for location‐independent and cost‐effective training in a novel patent foramen ovale closure device system. Future prospective trials comparing teleproctoring with traditional on‐site proctoring are warranted.

Uncertainties and Controversies in the Management of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of patent foramen ovale closure over medical therapy alone for patients who have had a stroke that has been attributed to the patent foramen ovale. Nevertheless, there are many areas of uncertainty and controversy related to patient selection, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. We summarize the available data on these challenging topics and attempt to provide some clarity and future directions for clinicians and investigators.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Interventions for Structural Heart Disease

Contemporary evidence supports device-based transcatheter interventions for the management of patients with structural heart disease. These procedures, which include aortic valve implantation, mitral or tricuspid valve repair/implantation, left atrial appendage occlusion, and patent foramen ovale closure, profoundly differ with respect to clinical indications and procedural aspects. Yet, patients undergoing transcatheter cardiac interventions require antithrombotic therapy before, during, or after the procedure to prevent thromboembolic events. However, these therapies are associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications. To date, challenges and controversies exist regarding balancing the risk of thrombotic and bleeding complications in these patients such that the optimal antithrombotic regimens to adopt in each specific procedure is still unclear. In this review, we summarize current evidence on antithrombotic therapies for device-based transcatheter interventions targeting structural heart disease and emphasize the importance of a tailored approach in these patients.

Predictors of Residual Right-to-Left Shunt After Percutaneous Suture-Mediated Patent Fossa Ovalis Closure

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess patent fossa ovalis (PFO) anatomy by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients undergoing percutaneous suture-mediated PFO closure to identify predictors of post-procedural residual atrial right-to-left shunt (RLS).

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous suture-mediated PFO closure has been proven to be a safe and effective technique in most PFO patients.

METHODS

From June 2016 to October 2019, 247 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous suture-mediated PFO closure at our institution. Of them, 230 (46 ± 13 years of age, 146 women) had complete and technically evaluable pre-procedural TEE. The following parameters in short-axis view were assessed: presence and grade of spontaneous RLS, PFO length and width, presence of atrial septal aneurysm and its maximal bulge, and presence of an embryonic or fetal remnant (Chiari network or Eustachian valve).

RESULTS

At the first follow-up transthoracic echocardiography performed between 3 and 6 months from the closure procedure, a residual RLS ≥2 grade was found in 37 (16%) patients. Grade of pre-procedural spontaneous RLS (hazard ratio: 1.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.14 to 3.48; p = 0.016) shunt and PFO width (hazard ratio: 2.52; 95% confidence interval: 1.85 to 3.43; p < 0.001) were both found to be significantly associated with significant residual RLS at multivariable analysis. The presence of atrial septal aneurysm and its maximal bulge and of congenital remnants was not associated with significant residual RLS.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous suture-mediated PFO closure is feasible in the majority of septal anatomies; however, PFO >5 mm in width and spontaneous large RLS are less likely to be closed with 1 stitch only.

Use of the NobleStitch™ EL for the treatment of patients with residual right-to-left shunt following device closure of PFO

The unique design of the NobleStitch™ EL allows it to be used to close residual defects following failed device PFO closure without impacting the integrity of previously placed double-disk Gore occluders.

The evolving role of echocardiography in the assessment of patent foramen ovale in patients with left-side thromboembolism

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is the most common congenital cardiac abnormality found approximately in 25% of the adult population The pathophysiological role of paradoxical embolization through the PFO in ischemic stroke is well established. "Self-expanding double disk" and, more recently, suture-based "deviceless" systems are used for PFO closure in the setting of secondary prevention after ischemic stroke likely related to paradoxical embolization. Ultrasound plays a significant role in PFO assessment, indication to treatment, intra-procedural guidance, and follow-up for those undergoing PFO closure. Three different techniques are frequently used for these purposes: transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiogram, and transcranial Doppler. In this review, advantages and limits of these techniques are discussed in detail to improve our skills in detection and treatment of this important condition by using ultrasound.

A severe right-to-left intracardiac shunt after NobleStitch failure: when a device is needed

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been demonstrated to be superior to medical therapy in stroke prevention in selected patients. Beyond traditional permanent metallic devices, NobleStitch EL, a suture-based system, has been developed as a potential alternative.

CASE SUMMARY

A 50-year-old man underwent transcatheter closure of PFO with mild interatrial septal bulging and tunnel-like morphology with a NobleStitch device. A transthoracic echocardiography performed immediately after PFO closure showed residual shunt (RS), which persisted unchanged at staged controls, due to the inability of the delivery system to capture both the septum primum and the septum secundum. A second procedure was performed with the implantation of a Figulla Flex II 27/30 mm device, with no RS detectable at control echocardiography.

DISCUSSION

The NobleStitch device is interesting in its concept, but several pitfalls may be encountered during its deployment. Opposite to permanent metallic devices, RSs after the procedure are not expected to decrease over time and should be managed with a different approach.

Structural heart intervention for prevention of embolic and hemorrhagic stroke: The new field of neurocardiology

Cardiogenic stroke (CS), characteristic causes of which include atrial fibrillation (AF) and right-to-left shunting due to a patent foramen ovale (PFO), has a well-known tendency to be associated with a more extensive ischemic area. This may result in severe neurological damage, and require strict life-long antithrombotic therapy. However, the fact that some patients have problems complying with the requirement for extended oral antithrombotic treatment has motivated the development of alternative approaches for stroke prevention. Heart structures such as the left atrial appendage (LAA) and PFO are potential targets for stroke prevention by way of device implantation. Several large prospective randomized clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy and safety of devices dedicated to this purpose. Percutaneous LAA occlusion for patients with non-valvular AF resulted in similar embolic event rates but significantly reduced bleeding events than did therapy with warfarin. Furthermore, PFO closure significantly reduced the frequency of recurrent embolic stroke relative to oral antithrombotic treatment. Current unsolved problems remaining in the application of these two strategies can be identified as the lack of standardized regimens for post-procedural antithrombotic therapy, ambiguity of determining the indications therefore, and the problem of device-related thrombus, which need to be investigated in depth in future. Cost-benefit analysis in comparison with standard medication is also required for each instance. A heart-brain multidisciplinary team approach, mandated to start such structural heart interventions, will become the future standard unit of personnel for stroke management, which promises to usher in the new field of neurocardiology.

Cryptogenic stroke over 60 years of age: should patent foramen ovale be closed?

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an anatomical communication between the left and the right atrium due to the lack of completed sealing of the fossa ovalis. Epidemiologic data, for the most part derived from young populations studies, suggested that PFO, allowing paradoxical embolization of thrombotic material from the venous to the arterial district, could play a significant role in the pathogenesis of cryptogenic ischaemic cerebral events. Recently, three randomized studies in patients ≤60 years of age demonstrated the superiority of percutaneous closure of PFO over medical antithrombotic treatment. Several studies, on the other hand, indicated that also in older patients with cryptogenic cerebral ischaemia, there was an higher prevalence of PFO in patients at low atherosclerosis and cardioembolic risk, and increased incidence of adverse cerebral events (mostly cryptogenic in patients treated medically, but likely due to a new cause in patients who had percutaneous closure of PFO). Advanced age is associated with more risk factors for deep vein thrombosis, and consequent paradoxical embolization through the PFO, so much so that careful consideration should be given to patients over the age of 60 years with cryptogenic stroke, as to not forgo the benefit of percutaneous closure of PFO, merely for anagraphic consideration. This consideration is particularly poignant in light of the more recent technical advances now available, such as direct percutaneous suture, mostly appealing for elderly patients, for its better tolerability and high safety both peri-procedural and during the follow-up, as well as the lack of necessity for antithrombotic treatment.

Role of PFO Closure in Ischemic Stroke Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight recent advancements in the management of acute ischemic stroke patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO).

RECENT FINDINGS

One significant recent development was publication of long-term follow-up data from the RESPECT trial demonstrating evidence in favor of PFO closure over medical management. This data subsequently led to FDA approval for AMPLATZER™ septal occluder in the treatment of patients aged 18 to 60 years with both PFO and no other determined etiology for ischemic stroke, otherwise referred to as embolic stroke of undetermined source. Several subsequent closure trial results have recently been published, which also demonstrated benefit of PFO closure over medical management for ischemic stroke risk reduction in select patients. Based on the results of the more recently published REDUCE trial, the FDA granted approval for the GORE™ septal occluder. There is current, well-established evidence that PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention is effective in select cases.

State-of-the-Art Atrial Septal Defect Closure Devices for Congenital Heart

This article describes current devices and indications for transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defect (TC-ASD) and patent foramen ovale in children and young adults. TC-ASD has a proven record of efficacy and safety, but device erosion raises questions about the relative safety of TC-ASD versus operative open heart surgical ASD closure. New devices for ASD closure with properties to reduce risk of erosion are being developed. Recent studies demonstrating superiority of patent foramen ovale device closure over medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke may lead to changes in practice for structural/interventional cardiologists. Care should be taken in extrapolating data to children and younger adults.