CASTLE score versus J-CTO score for the prediction of technical success in chronic total occlusion percutaneous revascularisation

Evaluation of Success and Complications Scores for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights from the Latin American Registry

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention is a complex procedure and is associated with considerable risk of complications. Several success and complication scores have been developed; however, data regarding their external validation in other populations such as Latin America are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the main predictors of success and complications in a broad cohort of procedures in the Latin American (LATAM) CTO registry. From April 2008 to December 2023, 3,706 consecutive procedures listed in the LATAM CTO registry were screened. Of these, 2,835 procedures had sufficient information to analyze the Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan (J-CTO); Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS); Ostial location, Rentrop grade, and Age (ORA); Clinical and Lesion-related Score (CL-score); and EuroCTO Score (CASTLE) success scores. The complication scores were PROGRESS (MACE, mortality, and pericardiocentesis) and Outcomes, Patient health status, and Efficiency iN Chronic Total Occlusion hybrid procedures (OPEN-CTO),OPEN-CLEAN. The J-CTO and CASTLE scores demonstrated the highest areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.718 and 0.703, respectively. The AUC value for the CL-score was 0.685, whereas the PROGRESS score had an AUC of 0.598 and the ORA AUC was 0.545. The level of agreement between scores was low; only 4% of the procedures were classified as difficult or very difficult by all scores and <1% were classified as easy by all 5 scores. Of the complication scores, PROGRESS mortality (AUC 0.651) and PROGRESS MACE (AUC 0.588) showed the best performance, identifying groups with >10% event rate. These results may improve the selection of revascularization techniques, especially for patient demographics that are historically underrepresented in CTO research.

The added value of coronary CTA in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically investigate and summarize the utility of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in the management of chronic total occlusion (CTO)-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

The authors searched the four databases between 2005 and 2023 for studies investigating the role of CCTA and invasive coronary angiograms (ICA) images when used as the pre-procedural tool for CTO-PCI. Efficacy and safety of CCTA in CTO-PCI treatment as a pre-procedural assessment tool was evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were finally chosen for this systematic review. CCTA had a high degree of agreement with ICA when applied for J-CTO scoring system. A J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score > 3, together with calcification, occlusion length ≥ 20 mm, blunt stump, and bending > 45° were shared imaging risk factors on both ICA and CCTA for technique failure and guidewire crossing over 30 min. Additionally, negative remodeling and multiple diseased vessel were significant indicators on CCTA. Although patients with pre-procedural CCTA showed a trend of higher success rate and easier guidewire crossing, and CCTA showed a slightly higher predictive accuracy for process success, no significant improvement in post-PCI major adverse cardiac events of using CCTA for assessment has been achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

CCTA is a safe and effective pre-operative tool of CTO-PCI. Except for the shared imaging risk factors with ICA for a hard CTO-PCI including calcification, occlusion length ≥ 20 mm, blunt stump, bending > 45°, and J-CTO score > 3, factors like negative remodeling and multiple diseased vessel were also recognized as significant pre-operative assessment indicators on CCTA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

A pre-procedural assessment based on coronary computed tomographic angiography has the potential to aid in the management of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

KEY POINTS

• A coronary computed tomographic angiography-based pre-procedural assessment can help chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention management. • The recognized high-risk features detected via coronary computed tomographic angiography and invasive coronary angiograms are comparable in detecting difficult lesions and chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention failure. • Coronary computed tomographic angiography has an additional value to be a safe and effective pre-procedural assessment tool for chronic total occlusion-percutaneous coronary intervention.

Guide catheter extension use are associated with higher procedural success in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions

BACKGROUND

Guide catheter extensions (GCEs) increase support and facilitate equipment delivery, but aggressive instrumentation may be associated with a higher risk of complications.

AIM

Our aim was to assess the impact of GCEs on procedural success and complications in patients submitted to chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

We analyzed data from the multicenter LATAM CTO Registry. Procedural success was defined as <30% residual stenosis and TIMI 3 distal flow. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare outcomes with and without GCE use.

RESULTS

From August 2010 to August 2021, 3049 patients were included. GCEs were used in 438 patients (14.5%). In unadjusted analysis, patients in the GCE group were older and had more comorbidities. The median J-CTO score and its components were higher in the GCE group. After PSM, procedural success was higher with GCE use (87.7% vs. 80.5%, p = 0.007). The incidence of coronary perforation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-2.71, p = 0.230), bleeding (OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 0.41-2.41, p = 0.986), in-hospital death (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 0.54-3.62, p = 0.495) and MACCE (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.52-2.19, p = 0.850) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In a contemporary, multicenter cohort of patients undergoing CTO PCI, GCEs were used in older patients, with more comorbidities and complex anatomy. After PSM, GCE use was associated with higher procedural success, and similar incidence of adverse outcomes.

Outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention from the RAIAN (RAjaie - Iran) registry

OBJECTIVE

While most of the evidence in CTO interventions emerge from Western and Japanese studies, few data have been published up today from the Middle East. Objective of this study was to evaluate technical success rates and clinical outcomes of an Iranian population undergoing CTO PCI in a tertiary referral hospital. Moreover, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of our CTO teaching program.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center cohort study including 790 patients who underwent CTO PCI performed by operators with different volumes of CTOs PCI performed per year. According to PCI result, all patients have been divided into successful (n = 555, 70.3 %) and unsuccessful (n = 235, 29.7 %) groups. Study endpoints were Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Health Status Improvement evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire at one year.

RESULTS

A global success rate of 70 % for antegrade and 80 % for retrograde approach was shown despite the lack of some CTO-dedicated devices. During the enrollment period, the success rate increased significantly among operators with a lower number of CTO procedures per year. One-year MACE rate was similar in both successful and unsuccessful groups (13.5 % in successful and 10.6 % in unsuccessful group, p = 0.173). One year patients' health status improved significantly only in successful group.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences of in-hospital and one-year MACE were found between the successful and unsuccessful groups. Angina symptoms and quality of life significantly improved after successful CTO PCI. The RAIAN registry confirmed the importance of operator expertise for CTO PCI success.

Machine Learning for Prediction of Technical Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion

(1) Background: The probability of technical success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) represents essential information for specifying the priority of PCI for treatment selection in patients with CTO. However, the predictabilities of existing scores based on conventional regression analysis remain modest, leaving room for improvements in model discrimination. Recently, machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as highly effective methods for prediction and decision-making in various disciplines. We therefore investigated the predictability of ML models for technical results of CTO-PCI and compared their performances to the results from existing scores, including J-CTO, CL, and CASTLE scores. (2) Methods: This analysis used data from the Japanese CTO-PCI expert registry, which enrolled 8760 consecutive patients undergoing CTO-PCI. The performance of prediction models was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (ROC-AUC). (3) Results: Technical success was achieved in 7990 procedures, accounting for an overall success rate of 91.2%. The best ML model, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), outperformed the conventional prediction scores with ROC-AUC (XGBoost 0.760 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.740-0.780] vs. J-CTO 0.697 [95%CI: 0.675-0.719], CL 0.662 [95%CI: 0.639-0.684], CASTLE 0.659 [95%CI: 0.636-0.681]; p < 0.005 for all). The XGBoost model demonstrated acceptable concordance between the observed and predicted probabilities of CTO-PCI failure. Calcification was the leading predictor. (4) Conclusions: ML techniques provide accurate, specific information regarding the likelihood of success in CTO-PCI, which would help select the best treatment for individual patients with CTO.

The challenges of a randomised placebo-controlled trial of CTO PCI vs. placebo with optimal medical therapy: The ORBITA-CTO pilot study design and protocol

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) has been performed for the improvement of symptoms and quality of life in patients with stable angina. The ORBITA study demonstrated the role of the placebo effect in contemporary PCI in non-CTO chronic coronary syndromes. However, the benefit of CTO PCI beyond that of a placebo has not been demonstrated.

Aims

The ORBITA-CTO pilot study will be a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of CTO PCI randomising patients who have: (1) been accepted by a CTO operator for PCI; (2) experienced symptoms due to a CTO; (3) evidence of ischaemia; (4) evidence of viability within the CTO territory; and (5) a J-CTO score ≤3.

Methods

Patients will undergo medication optimisation that will ensure they are on at least a minimum amount of anti-anginals and complete questionnaires. Patients will record their symptoms on an app daily throughout the study. Patients will undergo randomisation procedures, including an overnight stay, and be discharged the following day. All anti-anginals will be stopped after randomisation and re-initiated on a patient-led basis during the 6-month follow-up period. At follow-up, patients will undergo repeat questionnaires and unblinding, with a further 2-week unblinded follow-up.

Results

The co-primary outcomes are feasibility (blinding) in this cohort and angina symptom score using an ordinal clinical outcome scale for angina. Secondary outcomes include changes in quality-of-life measures, Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), peak VO2, and anaerobic threshold on the cardiopulmonary exercise test.

Conclusion

The feasibility of a placebo-controlled CTO PCI study will lead to future studies assessing efficacy. The impact of CTO PCI on angina measured using a novel daily symptom app may provide improved fidelity in assessing symptoms in patients with CTO's.

Performance of the J-CTO score versus other risk scores for predicting procedural difficulty in coronary chronic total occlusion interventions

BACKGROUND

Although the Japanese chronic total occlusion (J-CTO) score is widely used to assess the complexity of revascularization for CTO lesions, ambiguous and conflicting results are reported in validation studies. Therefore, we aimed to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of the J-CTO score and explore the heterogeneity of its comparison with other CTO scores.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched from January 1st, 2011 to December 23rd, 2021. Studies that examined the accuracy of the J-CTO score were eligible. Where feasible, estimates of discrimination and calibration were pooled with a random-effects model. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) was used for risk-of-bias assessment. This study was reported according to PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019126161).

RESULTS

Of 28 included studies (N = 34,944 lesions), 24 were eligible for meta-analysis. The J-CTO score demonstrated significant discrimination for 30-min wire crossing (summary C-statistic 0.76; 95% CI 0.68-0.84) and technical success (0.68; 95% CI 0.61-0.74) despite significant heterogeneity. Only 19 (33%) of the 58 pairwise comparisons with 14 competing scores that were based on discrimination reported a statistical result. The J-CTO score performed worse (relative difference of C-statistics >5%) in eight out of 33 independent comparisons but better in another 13. Methodological shortcomings resulted from only one study evaluating model calibration appropriately.

CONCLUSION

The discrimination power of the J-CTO score was useful for time-efficient wire crossing and moderate for angiographic success. Head-to-head comparisons of CTO scores would benefit from standardized reporting and appropriate statistical methods.Key messagesThe J-CTO score has useful discrimination in predicting 30-min wire crossing while performing moderately for technical success.After excluding optimism bias, there is insufficient independent evidence supporting the superiority of newly introduced models over the J-CTO score.Standardized methodology and assessment are needed to achieve a better understanding of CTO scores, especially for their calibration.

Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization

Background

The new EuroCTO CASTLE Score was validated against the widely adopted Japanese Multicenter CTO Registry (J-CTO) score in predicting technical success in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO).

Methods

A total of 463 patients treated by CTO PCI were included in a retrospective analysis. Result: The mean CASTLE score was 2.23 ± 1.1 and J-CTO score was 2.84 ± 1.0. The overall technical success rate was 83.2%. At 30 days follow up, a primary composite safety endpoint showed a low proportion of stent thrombosis (0.2%) and re-hospitalization (0.4%). Moreover, an improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 83% of patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcome: CASTLE score, area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.668, 95% CI: 0.606–0.730; J-CTO score AUC 0.692, 95% CI: 0.631–0.752; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.324. Those findings were even consistent in more complex procedures CASTLE Score ≥ 4 and J-CTO score ≥ 3: CASTLE Score AUC 0.514, 95% CI: 0.409–0.619; J-CTO score, AUC 0.617, 95% CI: 0.493–0.741; Comparison of AUCs: p = 0.211. Furthermore, increasing score values are accompanied by a longer examination and fluoroscopy time, more contrast medium and a higher dose area product.

Conclusion

Compared to the widely accepted J-CTO score, the new introduced EuroCTO CASTLE score demonstrated a comparable overall discriminatory performance in predicting technical outcomes in CTO PCI.

Chronic total occlusion revascularization: A complex piece to "complete" the puzzle

Treatment of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has rapidly increased during the past decades. Different strategies and approach were developed in the recent past years leading to an increase in CTO-PCI procedural success. The goal to achieve an extended revascularization with a high rate of completeness is now supported by strong scientific evidences and consequently, has led to an exponential increase in the number of CTO-PCI procedures, even if are still underutilized. It has been widely demonstrated that complete coronary revascularization, achieved by either coronary artery bypass graft or PCI, is associated with prognostic improvement, in terms of increased survival and reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events. The application of “contemporary” strategies aimed to obtain a state-of-the-art revascularization by PCI allows to achieve long-term clinical benefit, even in high-risk patients or complex coronary anatomy with CTO. The increasing success of CTO-PCI, allowing a complete or reasonable incomplete coronary revascularization, is enabling to overcome the last great challenge of interventional cardiology, adding a “complex” piece to “complete” the puzzle.

Update on chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) can be challenging to perform. The main indication for CTO PCI is to improve symptoms. Several contemporary studies have reported high CTO PCI success rates at experienced centers but success rates in all-comer registries remain low. Several scores can estimate the difficulty and the likelihood of success of CTO PCI. Dual arterial access and use of CTO crossing algorithms can improve the success and safety of CTO PCI. Intracoronary imaging can optimize stent expansion and minimize adverse cardiovascular events. While complications are more common in CTO PCI, careful planning and prompt diagnosis and treatment can prevent them or minimize their adverse consequences. In this article, we review contemporary data on the indications, safety and efficacy of CTO PCI.

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion by treated segment length

BACKGROUND

Long lesions are known to have worse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but there are limited data assessing the association between lesion length and clinical outcomes in PCI procedures undertaken in chronic total occlusions (CTO).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We formed a longitudinal cohort (2006-2018, n = 27,205) of stable angina patients who underwent PCI to CTO in the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) database. Clinical, demographical, procedural, and outcome data were analyzed in three groups by treated segment length, < 30 mm (n = 11,782), 30-59 mm (n = 10,415), ≥ 60 mm (n = 5008). Prevalence of previous myocardial infarction and PCI were higher in patients in 30-59 mm group or ≥ 60 mm group compared with < 30 mm group. Following multivariable analysis, no significant difference was observed in in-patient death (OR = 30-59 mm group = 1.10, CI:0.55-2.19, p = 0.78) (OR ≥ 60 mm group = 0.82, CI: 0.33-2.05, p = 0.67), and 1-year death (OR = 30-59 mm group = 1.06, CI: 0.81-1.37, p = 0.69) (OR ≥ 60 mm group =1.01, CI: 0.70-1.43, p = 0.99) (< 30 mm group = reference) but in-patient MACE was higher in > = 60 mm group (OR: 1.52, CI: 1.15-2.01, p = 0.06) but similar in 30-59 mm group (OR: 1.16, CI: 0.91-1.48, p = 0.22) compared with < 30 mm group. The adjusted rates of procedural complications were higher in ≥ 60 mm group (OR: 1.61, CI: 1.40-1.85, p < 0.001) but were similar in 30-59 mm group (OR: 1.06, CI: 0.94-1.20, p < 0.31) compared with < 30 mm group. For every 10 mm increase, there was an increased adjusted risk of in-patient procedural complications and coronary perforation but not in-patient MACE or death.

CONCLUSION

Patients with very long CTO lesions have higher risk of procedural complications and in-patient MACE but similar risk of short or long-term mortality compared with short CTO lesions.

Procedural Success Prediction Scoring Systems Used in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusions: A Systematic Evaluation

(1) Background: Data suggest that patients with coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could have better outcomes than those treated with optimal medical therapy alone. We aimed to systematically review dedicated scoring systems used to predict successful PCI in patients with CTO. (2) Methods: Electronic databases of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane were searched. (3) Results: 32 studies were included. We provided insights into all available predictive models of PCI success in CTO including predictive performance, validations, and comparisons between different scores and models' limitations. Considering the differences in the population included, coronary lesions, and techniques applied across clinical studies, the most used scores displayed a modest to good predictive value, as follows: J-CTO (AUC, 0.55-0.868), PROGRESS-CTO (AUC, 0.557-0.788), CL (AUC, 0.624-0.800), CASTLE (AUC, 0.633-0.68), and KCCT (AUC, 0.703-0.776). As PCI for CTO is one of the most complex interventions, using dedicated scoring systems could ensure an adequate case selection as well as preparation for an appropriate recanalization technique in order to increase chances of successful procedure. (4) Conclusion: Clinical models appear to be valuable tools for the prediction of PCI success in CTO patients. Clinicians should be aware of the limitations of each model and should be able to correctly select the most appropriate score according to real-life case particularities such as lesion complexity and operator experience in order to maximize success and achieve the best patients' outcomes.

A contemporary review of clinical significances of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions, with some Japanese insights

The clinical "significance" of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO-PCI) has been evaluated. In the beginning, the effects on clinical endpoints were investigated by comparisons between cases of success and failure of CTO-PCI, which mostly demonstrated better long-term outcomes in the successful cases. Similarly, improvement of cardiac function or wall motion was proven by serial observational studies. Accordingly, several prospective randomized trials (RCTs), which should confirm such accumulated potential benefits, were recently conducted by comparison with studies of patients that had received optical medical therapy (OMT) alone. While they mostly demonstrated significant improvement of angina symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in the CTO-PCI group, they failed to prove a reduction of clinical events or improvement of left ventricle wall motion, compared with OMT. Concurrent guidelines or consensus documents emphasize that the principal indication for CTO-PCI is to improve symptoms. To determine strategy, the following must be discussed in each individual case: the probability of procedural success, the expectation of long-term patency, and an assessment of the balance between procedure-related complications and overall benefits. In essence, we believe the following facts to be the current sincere appraisal of CTO-PCI: (1) improvements of symptoms and QOL are established, but the others remain inconclusive, and; (2) their margins for improvement are narrowing and numbers of candidates are shrinking. Precision medicine or individualization may be the right directions to take, to enhance the potential of this treatment. This course of action demands discrimination of those candidates who will truly receive benefits from invasive treatment, and that still requires further clinical studies or actions.

Predictors and complications of side branch occlusion after recanalization of chronic total occlusions complicated with bifurcation lesions

Data on risk factors and periprocedural complications associated with side branch (SB) occlusion after chronic coronary total occlusion (CTO) recanalization are limited. The aims of this study were to identify independent predictors of side branch (SB) occlusion after chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization and assess the relationship between SB occlusion and perioperative complications. 245 patients with CTO bifurcation lesions (BFLs) who underwent successful CTO recanalization were included in the study. In the occlusion group, most of the SB occlusions were observed after the implantation of the stents and lack of SB protection was more common. However, there was no significant between-group difference in the angles between the main vessel (MV) and SB. SB occlusion was associated with a higher risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction and a higher composite periprocedural complication rate. Identified as predictors of SB occlusion were no SB protection, use of a dissection-reentry strategy, ostial SB stenosis, and proximal MV stenosis of 50% or more.

Impact of intravascular ultrasound on chronic total occlusion percutaneous revascularization

AIM

We sought to investigate the impact of IVUS use on chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI using data from a contemporary registry of consecutive patients and applying a propensity score matching analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 514 successful CTO-PCIs, median age: 67 years (IQR: 58-73), 83.5% males. IVUS-guided PCI was performed in 184 (35.8%) of cases. After using 1:1 propensity matching score analysis, two groups of 182 patients each (IVUS-guided vs. angiography-guided CTO-PCI group) were produced to form the study population. In the IVUS-guided group the median maximum stent diameter was larger and the median total stented segment was longer compared to the angiography-guided group [(3.5 mm, IQR: 3.0-4.0 vs. 3.2 mm, IQR: 3.0-3.5, p < 0.001) and (60.0 mm, IQR: 38.0-91.3 vs. 38.0 mm, IQR: 32.0-70.5, p < 0.001), respectively]. In the IVUS-guided group, retrograde recanalization was more frequently encountered compared to the angiography-guided PCI group (30.2% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.04). Procedural time was significantly longer in the IVUS-guided group, without any difference in fluoroscopy time, radiation dose and contrast volume. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that IVUS use was the strongest independent factor associated with larger maximum diameter stents (p < 0.001) and a strong independent predictor for total stented segment length during CTO-PCI (p < 0.001). Up to 8 years follow-up, there was no difference in the incidence of the composite endpoint of all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization between the IVUS-guided PCI and the angiography-guided PCI groups (hazard ratio: 13.7% vs. 15.9%, respectively, log-rank: p = 0.67, median follow-up time: 49.0 months, IQR: 33.0-67.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of IVUS in CTO-PCI was associated with larger stent diameter and longer stented segments. Despite more frequent use of IVUS in retrograde CTO-PCI, there was no difference in long-term adverse events between IVUS and angiography CTO-PCI groups; nevertheless, the study was not powered to assess clinical outcomes.

Preprocedure Planning for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Separation Is in the Preparation

To perform chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention safely, efficiently, and successfully, adequate time must be dedicated to thorough preprocedural planning. This process should encompass a patient encounter, becoming fully familiarized with the patient's clinical traits, a detailed review of coronary anatomy, laying out an algorithmic procedural approach and making any relevant plans for actions that will enhance intraprocedural safety.

Utility of the SYNTAX Score in the risk stratification of patients undergoing rotational atherectomy

Introduction

The SYNTAX Score (SS) evaluates the angiographic complexity of coronary artery disease to assess the cardiovascular risk after coronary revascularization. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether SS results are associated with in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requiring rotational atherectomy (RA).

Material and methods

We analyzed data of 207 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with RA. Patients were divided into two groups: those with high SS (> 33 points) and those with low/intermediate SS (0–33 points).

Results

In 21 (10%) patients SS was high and 186 (90%) patients had low/intermediate SS. Patients with high SS were older (76 vs. 71 years, p = 0.008) and more frequently diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (38% vs. 18%, p = 0.03) and heart failure (71% vs. 30%, p = 0.0001). In patients with high SS the RA procedure was longer (p = 0.004), required more contrast (p = 0.005) and higher radiation doses (p = 0.04), and contrast-induced nephropathy was more frequent (14% vs. 2%, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

In our RA patients there was no significant difference between the frequency of in-hospital and 1-year adverse cardiovascular events depending on the SS result. High SS correlates only with parameters describing the extensity and technical complexity of the procedure. However, the unavailability of other risk assessment tools in this population raises the need to create a new more specific risk score for patients requiring RA.

Current approaches for treatment of coronary chronic occlusions

Introduction: Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) represent a challenging subset in interventional cardiology.Areas covered: During the last decade, improvements in materials, techniques, and meticulous pre-procedural lesion assessment have increased the success rate in CTO lesions. Several scores have been developed to address overall lesion evaluation and help select the most appropriate treatment strategy. In addition, specific algorithms such as the hybrid algorithm have been introduced to provide a framework for CTO operators and a rapid management of the various challenging aspects of the procedure. The hybrid approach requires operator's ability to switch from one treatment strategy to another when the first one appears to be unsuccessful. Adequate training and operators' experience remain crucial to improve the likelihood of success.Expert opinion: The aim of this review is to provide insights and guidance for operators on current approaches for treatment of CTO and complication management.