1
|
Su YY, Chiang NJ, Chiu TJ, Huang CJ, Hsu SJ, Lin HC, Yang SH, Yang Y, Chou WC, Chen YY, Bai LY, Li CP, Chen JS. Systemic treatments in pancreatic cancer: Taiwan pancreas society recommendation. Biomed J 2024; 47:100696. [PMID: 38169173 PMCID: PMC11332987 DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2023.100696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Over the past decade, significant therapeutic advancements have improved the survival rates of patients with pancreatic cancer. One of the primary factors contributing to these positive outcomes is the evolution of chemotherapy, from monotherapy to doublet or triplet regimens, and the integration of multimodal approaches. Additionally, targeted agents tailored to patients with specific genetic alterations and the development of cell therapies show promise in benefiting certain subpopulations. This article focuses on examining pivotal studies that explore the role of chemotherapy in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, maintenance, and salvage settings; highlights interesting findings related to cell therapy; and provides an overview of ongoing trials concerning metastatic settings. This review primarily aimed to offer recommendations based on therapeutic evidence, recent advancements in new treatment combinations, and the most innovative approaches. A unique aspect of this review is the inclusion of published papers on clinical trials and real-world data in Taiwan, thus adding a valuable perspective to the overall analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung-Yeh Su
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, and Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Nai-Jung Chiang
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Therapeutic and Research Center of Pancreatic Cancer, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Jan Chiu
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Jui Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Shao-Jung Hsu
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Therapeutic and Research Center of Pancreatic Cancer, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chen Lin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hung Yang
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Youngsen Yang
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; College of Medicine, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chi Chou
- Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Hematology-Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Yang Chen
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Yuan Bai
- College of Medicine, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Division of Hematology and Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Pin Li
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Therapeutic and Research Center of Pancreatic Cancer, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Clinical Skills Training, Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Jen-Shi Chen
- Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Hematology-Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Toledo B, Deiana C, Scianò F, Brandi G, Marchal JA, Perán M, Giovannetti E. Treatment resistance in pancreatic and biliary tract cancer: molecular and clinical pharmacology perspectives. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2024; 17:323-347. [PMID: 38413373 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2024.2319340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment resistance poses a significant obstacle in oncology, especially in biliary tract cancer (BTC) and pancreatic cancer (PC). Current therapeutic options include chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Resistance to these treatments may arise due to diverse molecular mechanisms, such as genetic and epigenetic modifications, altered drug metabolism and efflux, and changes in the tumor microenvironment. Identifying and overcoming these mechanisms is a major focus of research: strategies being explored include combination therapies, modulation of the tumor microenvironment, and personalized approaches. AREAS COVERED We provide a current overview and discussion of the most relevant mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy, target therapy, and immunotherapy in both BTC and PC. Furthermore, we compare the different strategies that are being implemented to overcome these obstacles. EXPERT OPINION So far there is no unified theory on drug resistance and progress is limited. To overcome this issue, individualized patient approaches, possibly through liquid biopsies or single-cell transcriptome studies, are suggested, along with the potential use of artificial intelligence, to guide effective treatment strategies. Furthermore, we provide insights into what we consider the most promising areas of research, and we speculate on the future of managing treatment resistance to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belén Toledo
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chiara Deiana
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabio Scianò
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Lumobiotics GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Juan Antonio Marchal
- Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), Centre for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Hospitales Universitarios de Granada-Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
- Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Excellence Research Unit "Modeling Nature" (MNat), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Macarena Perán
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain
- Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), Centre for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Excellence Research Unit "Modeling Nature" (MNat), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Elisa Giovannetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Pharmacology Lab, Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, Pisa, Italy
- Cancer Pharmacology Lab, Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) Start-Up Unit, Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang H, Tong Z, Liu L, Fu Q, Zhu X, Dai X, Bao X, Fang W, Zheng Y, Zhao P. Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan vs irinotecan as second-line treatment in pancreatic cancer patients: a randomized-controlled open-label Phase II study. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2023; 11:goac088. [PMID: 36751477 PMCID: PMC9897170 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Limited second-line therapeutic options are available for metastasis pancreatic cancer (mPC). We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan (IROX) in mPC patients. Methods This is an open-label, Phase 2, randomized study of mPC patients (aged 18-75 years) who failed when using gemcitabine plus S-1 as first-line therapy. Block randomization with a block size of four was used to randomly assign patients (1:1) between October 2015 and December 2017 to receive either IROX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 160 mg/m2) or irinotecan monotherapy (irinotecan 180 mg/m2) until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events, or consent withdrawal. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall response rate, and adverse event rate. Results A total of 74 patients were enrolled in this study, including 44 males and 30 females, with an average age of 61 years. The median overall survival was 10.2 and 6.7 months (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-1.2; P = 0.20) and the median progression-free survival was 5.1 and 2.3 months (adjusted HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6; P < 0.01) in the IROX group and irinotecan group, respectively. The overall response rates were 18.4% (7/38) in the IROX group and 5.5% (2/36) in the irinotecan group (P = 0.06). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 34% (13/38) of patients in the IROX group and 19% (7/36) of patients in the irinotecan group (P = 0.15). Conclusions IROX had no significant survival benefit over irinotecan monotherapy in our study. However, IROX reduced the risk of disease progression by 60%, with acceptable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hangyu Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China
| | - Zhou Tong
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China
| | - Lulu Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China
| | - Qihan Fu
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China
| | - Xudong Zhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China
| | - Xiaomeng Dai
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China
| | - Xuanwen Bao
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China
| | - Weijia Fang
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China
| | - Yi Zheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P. R. China
| | - Peng Zhao
- Corresponding author. Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, P. R. China. Tel: +86-571-87235147; ;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dayyani F, Macarulla T, Johnson A, Wainberg ZA. Second-line treatment options for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 113:102502. [PMID: 36641880 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this review was to characterize the second- and later-line (≥2L) treatment landscape for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). METHODS This systematic literature review (PROSPERO: CRD42021279753) involved searches of MEDLINE® and Embase to identify results from prospective studies of ≥2L treatment options for metastatic pancreatic cancer published from 2016 to 2021. Publications were screened according to predetermined eligibility criteria; population-level data were extracted using standardized data fields. Publication quality was assessed according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). The data were analyzed descriptively, grouped by drug class. RESULTS Sixty publications were identified, including 23 relating to comparative trials. GRADE assessment found that, of these 23 trials, 83% reported high or moderate-quality evidence. Of the publications relating to comparative trials, nine (three trials) reported favorable results: the pivotal phase 3 NAPOLI-1 trial for liposomal irinotecan; a phase 3 trial of non-liposomal irinotecan within the FOLFIRINOX regimen; and a phase 2 trial of eryaspase plus chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The level of unmet need for ≥2L treatment options for mPDAC remains high. Irinotecan-based regimens currently offer the greatest promise. Investigations into paradigm-changing agents and combination approaches continue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Teresa Macarulla
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mie T, Sasaki T, Okamoto T, Takeda T, Mori C, Furukawa T, Kasuga A, Matsuyama M, Ozaka M, Sasahira N. Treatment outcomes of nanoliposomal irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:1399-1407. [PMID: 36111430 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the treatment outcomes of nanoliposomal-irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) as second-line treatment after gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for metastatic and recurrent pancreatic cancer. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV or mFFX after first-line GnP treatment between March 2014 and October 2021 in our hospital. Patient characteristics, treatment outcomes and adverse events were extracted for comparison. RESULTS Two hundred sixteen patients were included (nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV/mFFX: 50/166). Patients in the nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group were older, had poorer ECOG PS, and a higher rate of peritoneal metastasis than those in the mFFX group. Median overall survival was 9.5 and 9.8 months (P = 0.97), respectively, and the median progression-free survival was 4.5 vs 4.8 months (P = 0.61), respectively. Anorexia, fatigue and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the mFFX group, but there was no difference in grade 3/4 adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in efficacy between nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV and mFFX after GnP. Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV appears to be a viable alternative to mFFX as second-line treatment after GnP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Mie
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Sasaki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Okamoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Takeda
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chinatsu Mori
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaaki Furukawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Kasuga
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Matsuyama
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Sasahira
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tezuka S, Ueno M, Kobayashi S, Hamaguchi T, Yamachika Y, Oishi R, Nagashima S, Fukushima T, Morimoto M, Shin M. Nal-IRI/5-FU/LV versus modified FOLFIRINOX and FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer: A single center retrospective study. Pancreatology 2022; 22:789-796. [PMID: 35705458 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The preferred regimen for unresectable pancreatic cancer following gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is not well-established. This study compared the efficacy of (ⅰ) liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV) versus modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) and (ⅱ) nal-IRI/5-FU/LV versus FOLFIRI, respectively, and the safety of the three regimens each other, as second-line chemotherapies for unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS This was a retrospective single-center analysis of all patients who were administered nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, mFFX, or FOLFIRI from December 2014 to July 2021 as second-line chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) of all patients, excluding those with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Regarding safety, we assessed the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events of interest in all patients. RESULTS A total of 137 patients (nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, n = 55; mFFX, n = 39; FOLFIRI, n = 43) were included. The median OS in the nal-IRI/5-FU/LV group, the mFFX group, and the FOLFIRI group was 7.4, 11.8, and 8.4 months, respectively. Compared with the nal-IRI/5-FU/LV group, the mFFX and FOLFIRI groups displayed a hazard ratio of 0.66 [95% confidence interval 0.40-1.08] and 0.87 [95% confidence interval 0.55-1.39], respectively. In the FOLFIRI group, the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events tended to be low among all three groups. CONCLUSIONS Given the trend toward longer OS in the mFFX group and the lower incidence of adverse events in the FOLFIRI group, both mFFX and FOLFIRI, as well as nal-IRI/5-FU/LV, can be treatment options for second-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shun Tezuka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Tomomi Hamaguchi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yui Yamachika
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Ritsuko Oishi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Shuhei Nagashima
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Taito Fukushima
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Manabu Morimoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Maeda Shin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Satake T, Morizane C, Maruki Y, Ohba A, Nagashio Y, Kondo S, Hijioka S, Ueno H, Okusaka T. The influence of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on modified FOLFIRINOX dose in double-variant-type patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2022; 27:1331-1339. [PMID: 35637361 PMCID: PMC9309143 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02186-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND UGT1A1 polymorphisms should be considered when using irinotecan-containing regimens, especially in patients with a double-variant-type (DV), including homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 and heterozygous for both UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6. We investigated the safety and efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) (irinotecan 80 mg/m2) in patients having DV. METHODS Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had received FOLFIRINOX between January 2015 and December 2019 were included in this study. Non-DV patients received the standard mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 150 mg/m2) as first-line (non-DV1) or second-line therapy (non-DV2); however, DV patients received mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 80 mg/m2) as the second-line therapy (DV2). We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of the lowered irinotecan dose in the DV2 group relative to the non-DV1 (safety) or non-DV2 (safety and efficacy) groups. RESULTS A total of 235 patients were eligible for this study with 118 patients in the non-DV1, 106 in the non-DV2, and 11 in the DV2 groups. Major grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (33.9, 31.1, and 18.2%) and febrile neutropenia (6.8, 3.8, and 9.1%) in the non-DV1, non-DV2, and DV2 groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 months in the non-DV2 group, and 4.4 months in the DV2 group. The overall survival from the date of starting second-line chemotherapy was 8.8 months in the non-DV2 group and 11.5 months in the DV2 group. CONCLUSIONS Based on our findings, the safety and efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 80 mg/m2) in DV patients were comparable with the standard mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 150 mg/m2) in non-DV patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Satake
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Chigusa Morizane
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yuta Maruki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ohba
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yoshikuni Nagashio
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Kondo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Susumu Hijioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Hideki Ueno
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takuji Okusaka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Microfluidics Formulated Liposomes of Hypoxia Activated Prodrug for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14040713. [PMID: 35456547 PMCID: PMC9031349 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents as an unmet clinical challenge for drug delivery due to its unique hypoxic biology. Vinblastine-N-Oxide (CPD100) is a hypoxia-activated prodrug (HAP) that selectively converts to its parent compound, vinblastine, a potent cytotoxic agent, under oxygen gradient. The study evaluates the efficacy of microfluidics formulated liposomal CPD100 (CPD100Li) in PDAC. CPD100Li were formulated with a size of 95 nm and a polydispersity index of 0.2. CPD100Li was stable for a period of 18 months when freeze-dried at a concentration of 3.55 mg/mL. CPD100 and CPD100Li confirmed selective activation at low oxygen levels in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Moreover, in 3D spheroids, CPD100Li displayed higher penetration and disruption compared to CPD100. In patient-derived 3D organoids, CPD100Li exhibited higher cell inhibition in the organoids that displayed higher expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1A) compared to CPD100. In the orthotopic model, the combination of CPD100Li with gemcitabine (GEM) (standard of care for PDAC) showed higher efficacy than CPD100Li alone for a period of 90 days. In summary, the evaluation of CPD100Li in multiple cellular models provides a strong foundation for its clinical application in PDAC.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tezuka S, Ueno M, Oishi R, Nagashima S, Sano Y, Kawano K, Tanaka S, Fukushima T, Asama H, Konno N, Kobayashi S, Morimoto M, Maeda S. Modified FOLFIRINOX versus sequential chemotherapy (FOLFIRI/FOLFOX) as a second-line treatment regimen for unresectable pancreatic cancer: A real-world analysis. Cancer Med 2022; 11:1088-1098. [PMID: 34953056 PMCID: PMC8855892 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer has been proven to have survival benefit, it is not clear which is the most preferred regimen. This study compared the efficacy and safety of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and sequential chemotherapy (FOLFIRI/FOLFOX) as a second-line treatment regimen for unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHOD This was a retrospective single-center analysis of all patients who initiated treatment with mFOLFIRINOX or sequential chemotherapy from December 2014 to May 2019 as a second-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer. The sequential chemotherapy group included all patients who initiated sequential chemotherapy. For efficacy analysis, the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of all patients, excluding those with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. For safety analysis, we assessed the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events in all patients. RESULTS Seventy-four patients (mFOLFIRINOX group, n = 44; sequential chemotherapy group, n = 30) were included. OS tended to be slightly prolonged in the mFOLFIRINOX group than in the sequential chemotherapy group (median 10.6 [95% confidence interval {CI} 5.9-13.8] vs. 8.5 [95% CI 5.0-12.2] months; hazard ratio 1.40 [95% CI 0.71-2.71]). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 8.1% and 64.9%, respectively, in the mFOLFIRINOX group and 3.8% and 42.3%, respectively, in the sequential chemotherapy group. In safety analysis, the grade ≥3 rates of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and anorexia were 40.9%, 6.8%, and 18.2%, respectively, in the mFOLFIRINOX group and 3.3%, 0%, and 3.3%, respectively, in the sequential chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS Whereas efficacy tended to be slightly better in the mFOLFIRINOX group than in the sequential chemotherapy group, given the higher incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events with mFOLFIRINOX than with sequential chemotherapy, sequential chemotherapy is a regimen with better risk-benefit balance than mFOLFIRINOX, and can be considered a second-line treatment option for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shun Tezuka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Ritsuko Oishi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Shuhei Nagashima
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Yusuke Sano
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Kuniyuki Kawano
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Satoshi Tanaka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Taito Fukushima
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Asama
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Naoki Konno
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Satoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Manabu Morimoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical OncologyKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Shin Maeda
- Department of GastroenterologyYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Murakawa Y, Ootsuka K, Abue M. The Appropriate First-Line Chemotherapy Regimen for Incurable Pancreatic Cancer in Clinical Practice: A Consideration of Patients' Overall Survival and Quality of Life. J Pancreat Cancer 2021; 7:48-56. [PMID: 34901695 PMCID: PMC8655810 DOI: 10.1089/pancan.2021.0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: For incurable pancreatic cancer, the therapeutic goal is to prolong survival and maintain the quality of life (QOL). Unexpected outpatient consultation (OCT) and emergency hospitalization lead to QOL deterioration. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (nabPTX+GEM) as the preferred first-line regimens. Japanese clinical practice guidelines further recommend GEM and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1). Currently, no treatment strategy considers QOL at any stage during a patient's clinical course. Methods: In this study, hospital-free survival (HFS), defined as the period without hospitalization and OCT, was introduced as a new indicator of the qualitative aspect of overall survival (OS). We compared OS, length of hospitalization (LOH), OCT, and HFS for the four first-line chemotherapy groups. Results: No significant difference was observed in the median OS and HFS, nor was there a strong correlation between OS and LOH, based on the four first-line chemotherapy groups. In contrast, there were strong correlations between OS and OCT and between OS and HFS in all first-line chemotherapy groups. The ratio of OCT to OS was similar for mFOLFIRINOX and nabPTX+GEM. S-1 had the lowest OCT-to-OS ratio. The ratio of HFS to OS declined from highest to lowest in the order S-1, nabPTX+GEM, mFOLFIRINOX, and GEM. Conclusion: Our findings suggested existence of correlation differences between OS and HFS between first-line mFOLFIRINOX and first-line nabPTX+GEM. In addition, a good HFS was obtained with S-1 alone in some cases. In the future, clinical trials for chemotherapy should examine QOL during the entire clinical course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuko Murakawa
- Department of Cancer Chemotherapy and Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan
| | - Kazunori Ootsuka
- Department of Cancer Chemotherapy and Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan
| | - Makoto Abue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blomstrand H, Batra A, Cheung WY, Elander NO. Real-world evidence on first- and second-line palliative chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:787-799. [PMID: 34631442 PMCID: PMC8479347 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In spite of recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances, the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains very poor. As most patients are not amenable to curative intent treatments, optimized palliative management is highly needed. One key question is to what extent promising results produced by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) correspond to clinically meaningful outcomes in patients treated outside the strict frames of a clinical trial. To answer such questions, real-world evidence is necessary. The present paper reviews and discusses the current literature on first- and second-line palliative chemotherapy in PDAC. Notably, a growing number of studies report that the outcomes of the two predominant first-line multidrug regimens, i.e. gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and folfirinox (FFX), is similar in RCTs and real-life populations. Outcomes of second-line therapy following failure of first-line regimens are still dismal, and considerable uncertainty of the optimal management remains. Additional RCTs and real-world evidence studies focusing on the optimal treatment sequence, such as FFX followed by GnP or vice versa, are urgently needed. Finally, the review highlights the need for prognostic and predictive biomarkers to inform clinical decision making and enable personalized management in advanced PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakon Blomstrand
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping 58185, Sweden
| | - Atul Batra
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Nils Oskar Elander
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping 58185, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Go SI, Lee SC, Bae WK, Zang DY, Lee HW, Jang JS, Ji JH, Kim JH, Park S, Sym SJ, Yang Y, Jeon SY, Hwang IG, Oh SY, Kang JH. Modified FOLFIRINOX versus S-1 as second-line chemotherapy in gemcitabine-failed metastatic pancreatic cancer patients: A randomised controlled trial (MPACA-3). Eur J Cancer 2021; 157:21-30. [PMID: 34464782 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) as a second-line chemotherapy treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC), remains unclear. This multi-center randomised phase III trial aimed to elucidate the efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy treatment for mPAC patients with good performance status. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty mPAC patients (age, 19-75 years) refractory to first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were randomly selected to receive mFOLFIRINOX or S-1. mFOLFIRINOX comprised oxaliplatin (65 mg/m2), irinotecan (135 mg/m2), and leucovorin (400 mg/m2) on day 1 and continuous 5-FU infusion (1000 mg/m2) over 24 h on days 1-2 every 2 weeks. S-1 comprised body surface area-dependent oral S-1, divided into two doses per day on days 1-28 every 6 weeks. RESULTS Overall survival was the primary endpoint. The objective response and disease control rates were higher in the mFOLFIRINOX than in the S-1 group (15% versus 2%; p = .04 and 67% versus 37%; p = .007). The median progression-free survival rates were 5.2 and 2.2 months in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 groups, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: .4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .2-.6; p < .001). The median overall survival rates were 9.2 and 4.9 months in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 groups, respectively (adjusted HR: .4; 95% CI: .2-.7; p = .002). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 56% and 17% of the patients in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-1 groups, respectively (p < .001). CONCLUSION Administration of mFOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy treatment for mPAC patients refractory to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy resulted in increased survival rates than S-1 treatment alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se-Il Go
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Cheol Lee
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Kyun Bae
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Young Zang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Woo Lee
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Joung Soon Jang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Ho Ji
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Hoon Kim
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea
| | - Sanggon Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hemato-oncology, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Jin Sym
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yaewon Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk University Hospital, Chungbuk University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - So Yeon Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
| | - In Gyu Hwang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Yong Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jung Hun Kang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Science, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miwa H, Sugimori K, Ishii T, Funaoka A, Tsuchiya H, Suzuki Y, Sugimori M, Nishimura M, Tozuka Y, Komiyama S, Sato T, Kaneko T, Numata K, Maeda S. Multiple-line Chemotherapy for a Patient with Unresectable Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm of the Pancreas. Intern Med 2021; 60:2607-2612. [PMID: 33642489 PMCID: PMC8429298 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6755-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A 74-year-old woman with a cyst in her pancreatic tail was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography confirmed a large cystic lesion with irregular wall thickening, abdominal lymph node swelling, and ascites. We diagnosed her with an unresectable mucinous cystic neoplasm, since ascites cytology revealed adenocarcinoma. The patient received chemotherapy up to the fifth line for 55.2 months. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and modified FOLFIRINOX achieved a partial response with a progression-free survival time of 12.1 and 20.4 months, respectively. The overall survival time from the beginning of first-line chemotherapy was 69.4 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haruo Miwa
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Kazuya Sugimori
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Ishii
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Akihiro Funaoka
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Hiromi Tsuchiya
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Yoshimasa Suzuki
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Makoto Sugimori
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Masaki Nishimura
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tozuka
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Satoshi Komiyama
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sato
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Takashi Kaneko
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Kazushi Numata
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Japan
| | - Shin Maeda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ikezawa K, Kiyota R, Takada R, Daiku K, Maeda S, Imai T, Abe Y, Kai Y, Yamai T, Fukutake N, Nakabori T, Ashida R, Uehara H, Tabuchi T, Katayama K, Ohkawa K. Efficacy and safety of modified fluorouracil/leucovorin plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) compared with S-1 as second-line chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer. JGH Open 2021; 5:679-685. [PMID: 34124386 PMCID: PMC8171163 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The optimal standard second-line chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of modified fluorouracil/leucovorin plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) compared with oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 as a second-line chemotherapy in patients with MPC. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 76 consecutive patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent mFOLFIRINOX or S-1 treatment as a second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) failure at our department between December 2014 and February 2019. RESULTS Patients who underwent mFOLFIRINOX treatment exhibited significantly better objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) than S-1 (ORR, 20.0% vs 0%, P = 0.003; PFS, 3.7 vs 2.1 months, P = 0.010). Although baseline patient characteristics of age, performance status, and serum albumin levels differed significantly between the two groups, mFOLFIRINOX was identified as an independent factor of favorable PFS on multivariate analyses. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy occurred more frequently in the mFOLFIRINOX group. The median overall survival from the initiation of second-line chemotherapy was not significantly longer in the mFOLFIRINOX group than in the S1 group (8.5 vs 5.8 months, respectively; P = 0.213); however, the 8-month survival rate was significantly higher in the mFOLFIRINOX group (56.0% vs 27.5%, respectively; P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS mFOLFIRINOX as a second-line regimen contributed to favorable treatment outcomes, but induced more frequent adverse events than S-1. On multivariate analyses, mFOLFIRINOX was identified as an independent factor with favorable PFS, suggesting that mFOLFIRINOX could be a promising treatment option for patients with GnP failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Ikezawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Ryosuke Kiyota
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Ryoji Takada
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Kazuma Daiku
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Shingo Maeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Toshihiro Imai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Yutaro Abe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Yugo Kai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Takuo Yamai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Nobuyasu Fukutake
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Tasuku Nakabori
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Reiko Ashida
- Department of Cancer Survey and Gastrointestinal OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Uehara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Takahiro Tabuchi
- Cancer Control CenterOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Kazuhiro Katayama
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shelemey PT, Amaro CP, Ng D, Falck V, Tam VC. Metastatic pancreatic cancer with complete response to FOLFIRINOX treatment. BMJ Case Rep 2021; 14:14/5/e238395. [PMID: 34031062 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-238395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A 59-year-old woman presented with abdominal pain associated with nausea and night sweats. A large mass was found in the pancreatic tail and innumerable liver lesions were identified. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of a liver nodule confirmed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma consistent with a pancreatobiliary primary. On FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, subsequent CT scans showed shrinkage of the pancreatic mass and liver metastases. Her cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) normalised after 11 months. Oxaliplatin was discontinued due to peripheral neuropathy but she completed 37 cycles of FOLFIRI during which her pancreatic mass disappeared, liver lesions decreased in size and were subsequently deemed to be scar tissue by the radiologist. After 4 years of treatment, the patient agreed to a break from chemotherapy. Eighteen months afterwards, an MRI abdomen continues to demonstrate no visible pancreatic mass and the two remaining liver lesions, believed to be scar tissue, remain stable. Her CA 19-9 level remains normal. This appears to be a complete response to FOLFIRINOX/FOLFIRI chemotherapy in a patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paige T Shelemey
- Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Carla P Amaro
- Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Danny Ng
- Radiology, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vincent Falck
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vincent C Tam
- Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cherri S, Noventa S, Zaniboni A. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Beyond first line, where are we? World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:1847-1863. [PMID: 34007126 PMCID: PMC8108033 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i17.1847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is considered one of the most aggressive cancers, with an increasing incidence in recent years. To date, chemotherapy is still the standard of care for advanced metastatic disease, unfortunately providing only a slight advantage in terms of survival. The molecular and cellular characteristics of pancreatic cancer cells, as well as the cells that characterize the pancreatic tumour microenvironment, are the basis of the mechanisms of resistance to treatment. After progression during first-line treatment, few patients are eligible for second-line treatment due to the loss of performance status. To date, a clear survival advantage has not yet been demonstrated for second-line chemotherapy. Precision medicine could be the key to increasing responses to cancer treatment and finally impacting survival in this difficult-to-treat disease. In this review, we analyze current recommendations in the second-line setting and potential future prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Cherri
- Department of Oncology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia 25124, Italy
| | - Silvia Noventa
- Department of Oncology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia 25124, Italy
| | - Alberto Zaniboni
- Department of Oncology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia 25124, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Patterns of Palliative Chemotherapy and Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Focusing on Age: A Nationwide Real-World Danish Registry Study. Pancreas 2021; 50:685-695. [PMID: 34016900 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to identify patterns of palliative chemotherapy (CTh) and the associated overall survival (OS) in patients with pancreatic cancer, with specific focus on age. METHODS Between May 1, 2011, and April 30, 2016, 4260 patients were registered in the Danish Pancreatic Cancer Database. The 1715 patients receiving palliative CTh were retrieved. Age was grouped into less than 70, 70 to less than 75, and 75 years or more. RESULTS Of the 1715 patients receiving first-line CTh, 586 (34%) underwent second-line CTh and 151 (9%) third-line CTh. First-line gemcitabine resulted in a significant worse survival compared with combination CTh, hazard ratio 1.51. For combination CTh, OS differed between the age groups, P < 0.01. The median OS in the less than 70 years (n = 547), 70 to less than 75 years (n = 163), and 75 years or more (n = 67) groups were 9.3, 9.6, and 7.2 months, respectively. No differences in survival were observed among patients receiving first-line gemcitabine (P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS Our findings are useful in treatment-related decision making in patients with pancreatic cancer. A significant survival benefit was observed for all patients after first-line combination CTh. The effect of combination CTh was most prominent among patients aged less than 75 years. By age, no differences in survival were observed in those receiving gemcitabine.
Collapse
|
18
|
Park HS, Kang B, Chon HJ, Im HS, Lee CK, Kim I, Kang MJ, Hwang JE, Bae WK, Cheon J, Park JO, Hong JY, Kang JH, Kim JH, Lim SH, Kim JW, Kim JW, Yoo C, Choi HJ. Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin versus FOLFIRINOX as the second-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a multicenter retrospective study of the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG). ESMO Open 2021; 6:100049. [PMID: 33578192 PMCID: PMC7878976 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is no clear consensus on the recommended second-line treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have disease progression following gemcitabine-based therapy. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (FL) and FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) in patients who had failed on the first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. Patients and methods From January 2015 to August 2019, 378 patients with MPC who had received nal-IRI/FL (n = 104) or FOLFIRINOX (n = 274) as second-line treatment across 11 institutions were included in this retrospective study. Results There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups, except age and first-line regimens. With a median follow-up of 6 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months with nal-IRI/FL versus 4.6 months with FOLFIRINOX (P = 0.44). Median overall survival (OS) was 7.7 months with nal-IRI/FL versus 9.7 months with FOLFRINOX (P = 0.13). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the two regimens in the univariate and multivariate analyses. The subgroup analysis revealed that younger age (<70 years) was associated with better OS with FOLFIRINOX. In contrast, older age (≥70 years) was associated with better survival outcomes with nal-IRI/FL. Adverse events were manageable with both regimens; however, the incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy was higher in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX than with nal-IRI/FL. Conclusions Second-line nal-IRI/FL and FOLFIRINOX showed similar effectiveness outcomes after progression following first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. Age could be the determining factor for choosing the appropriate second-line therapy. This multicenter retrospective study investigated nal-IRI/FL and FOLFIRINOX outcomes after gemcitabine-based therapy. We found no significant differences in outcome between nal-IRI/FL and FOLFIRINOX treatment. Both regimens were well tolerated; however, neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were more frequent with FOLFIRINOX. Age (cut-off, 70 years) showed differential efficacy between chemotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Park
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - B Kang
- Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
| | - H J Chon
- Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
| | - H-S Im
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - C-K Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - I Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - M J Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - J E Hwang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - W K Bae
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - J Cheon
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - J O Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - J Y Hong
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - J H Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - J H Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - S H Lim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - J W Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - J-W Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - C Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - H J Choi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Foschini F, Napolitano F, Servetto A, Marciano R, Mozzillo E, Carratù AC, Santaniello A, De Placido P, Cascetta P, Butturini G, Frigerio I, Regi P, Silvestris N, Delcuratolo S, Vasile E, Vivaldi C, Bianco C, De Placido S, Formisano L, Bianco R. FOLFIRINOX after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective comparison with FOLFOX and FOLFIRI schedules. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920947970. [PMID: 33062062 PMCID: PMC7533956 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920947970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. In cases with metastasis, the combination of 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens are considered the standard of care. However, the optimal sequence of these regimens is unclear. Methods This retrospective study initially evaluated 186 patients with locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer at three Italian institutions between February 2013 and October 2019. All patients had progressed after receiving gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy and were subsequently offered second-line FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX-6, or FOLFIRI treatment. This study evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival from the start of second-line treatment (OS2), overall survival from the start of first-line treatment (OS1), and safety outcomes. Results A total of 77 patients received ⩾4 cycles of second-line chemotherapy and were considered eligible: 15 patients received FOLFIRINOX, 32 patients received FOLFOX-6, and 30 patients received FOLFIRI. The FOLFIRINOX group had median PFS of 26.29 weeks and median OS2 of 47.86 weeks, while the FOLFIRI group had median PFS of 10.57 weeks and median OS2 of 25.00 weeks (p = 0.038). No significant differences were observed between the FOLFIRINOX and FOLFOX-6 groups in terms of PFS (26.29 weeks versus 23.07 weeks) or OS2 (47.86 weeks versus 42.00 weeks). The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, which occurred more frequently in the FOLFIRINOX and FOLFOX-6 groups. Conclusion Relative to the FOLFIRI regimen, the FOLFIRINOX regimen had a favorable toxicity profile and better survival outcomes. No significant differences were observed relative to the FOLFOX-6 regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Foschini
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Fabiana Napolitano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Alberto Servetto
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Marciano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Eleonora Mozzillo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Anna Chiara Carratù
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Santaniello
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Priscilla Cascetta
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Isabella Frigerio
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Regi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Nicola Silvestris
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Sabina Delcuratolo
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Enrico Vasile
- Unit of Oncology 2, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Cataldo Bianco
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Catanzaro Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Sabino De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Formisano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Roberto Bianco
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Observational Study of Clinical Practice in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Greece. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2020; 2020:5304516. [PMID: 33014051 PMCID: PMC7520678 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5304516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background During the last decade, significant improvement was made in systemic therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). The impact of this progress in everyday clinical practice has not been fully described yet. The aim of the study was to investigate the pattern followed by Greek Medical Oncologists regarding the treatment of patients with PAC. Methods This observational, noninterventional multicenter study recorded clinical data from the files of 200 active patients (alive and under treatment or follow-up) for a two-year period (November 2015 until November 2017) from 20 oncology centers around Greece. Results In total, 51 (25.5%) patients underwent radical surgical resection of PAC, and 40 (78.4%) of them received adjuvant and 1 (2.0%) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median time to recurrence was 7.9 months, and median overall survival (OS), 20.2 months. First-line chemotherapy was administered to 193 (96.5%) patients. The majority of patients were treated with the combination of nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine (NPG), 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), or gemcitabine monotherapy. Of them, 39.5% responded to the treatment. Median OS and PFS were 14.1 months and 7.0 months, respectively. Second-line treatment was administered to 112 patients. The majority received NPG, FOLFIRINOX/capecitabine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (CAPOXIRI), or 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)/capecitabine, oxaliplatin (CAPOX). Median OS with second-line treatment was 8.6 months, and median PFS, 5.5 months. The most common chemotherapy sequences were NPG as first-line followed by FOLFIRINOX/CAPOXIRI as second-line, NPG followed by FOLFOX/CAPOX, NPG followed by other regimens, and FOLFIRINOX/CAPOXIRI followed by NPG. Conclusion This study described the significant improvement in prognosis of PAC patients receiving palliative chemotherapy and the relatively high rate of receipt of second-line chemotherapy, according to real-world data. However, due to the nonrandomized nature of the study, any comparison between different chemotherapy regimens should be regarded with caution.
Collapse
|
21
|
Franco F, Camara JC, Martín-Valadés JI, López-Alfonso A, Marrupe D, Gutiérrez-Abad D, Martínez-Amores B, León A, Juez I, Pérez M, Royuela A, Ruiz-Casado A. Clinical outcomes of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer in the real world setting. Clin Transl Oncol 2020; 23:812-819. [PMID: 32857340 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-020-02473-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES The incidence of pancreatic cancer is increasing in developed countries. The incorporation of new therapies, to the first-line treatment of patients with good performance status led to better survival in clinical trials. However, there is a wide variability in their use and some concerns about the treatment of elderly patients who were not included in the clinical trials. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter study. Data from consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) were analysed to evaluate efficacy (overall survival-OS) and toxicity. RESULTS A total of 119 patients were included. 49.6% were treated with FFX and 50.4% with GNP in first-line. The median OS was 12 months with no statistically significant differences between both regimens (12.7 m for FFX vs 10.2 m for GnP). Elevated Ca 19.9 levels and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) increased the risk of death. Patients who received both regimens in first/second line had a median OS longer than 15 months whichever the sequence. 32 patients (27%) were older than 70-y. 54% patients received a second-line treatment, 56% in the FFX group and 44% in the GnP group. The median OS for patients older than 70 was 9.5 m versus 12.3 m for patients younger than 70. Progression of the disease was the cause of death in 67.6% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS In our setting, the use of FFX and GnP for treating mPC is quite similar, but superiority could not be demonstrated for any of the schemes in the first line. OS was determined by basal levels of Ca 19.9 and NLR. Patients receiving both regimens in first/second line whichever the sequence, exhibited the best survival rates. In our series, elderly patients had poorer survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Franco
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.
| | - J C Camara
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fundación Hospital Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Spain
| | | | - A López-Alfonso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - D Marrupe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Móstoles, Móstoles, Spain
| | - D Gutiérrez-Abad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain
| | - B Martínez-Amores
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain
| | - A León
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Juez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain
| | - M Pérez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Royuela
- Department of Biostatistics, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain
| | - A Ruiz-Casado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gromisch C, Qadan M, Machado MA, Liu K, Colson Y, Grinstaff MW. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Unconventional Approaches for an Unconventional Disease. Cancer Res 2020; 80:3179-3192. [PMID: 32220831 PMCID: PMC7755309 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-2731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Revised: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This review highlights current treatments, limitations, and pitfalls in the management of pancreatic cancer and discusses current research in novel targets and drug development to overcome these clinical challenges. We begin with a review of the clinical landscape of pancreatic cancer, including genetic and environmental risk factors, as well as limitations in disease diagnosis and prevention. We next discuss current treatment paradigms for pancreatic cancer and the shortcomings of targeted therapy in this disease. Targeting major driver mutations in pancreatic cancer, such as dysregulation in the KRAS and TGFβ signaling pathways, have failed to improve survival outcomes compared with nontargeted chemotherapy; thus, we describe new advances in therapy such as Ras-binding pocket inhibitors. We then review next-generation approaches in nanomedicine and drug delivery, focusing on preclinical advancements in novel optical probes, antibodies, small-molecule agents, and nucleic acids to improve surgical outcomes in resectable disease, augment current therapies, expand druggable targets, and minimize morbidity. We conclude by summarizing progress in current research, identifying areas for future exploration in drug development and nanotechnology, and discussing future prospects for management of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gromisch
- Departments of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Biomedical Engineering, and Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mariana Albuquerque Machado
- Departments of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Biomedical Engineering, and Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kebin Liu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Georgia Cancer Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Yolonda Colson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mark W Grinstaff
- Departments of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Biomedical Engineering, and Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sawada M, Kasuga A, Mie T, Furukawa T, Taniguchi T, Fukuda K, Yamada Y, Takeda T, Kanata R, Matsuyama M, Sasaki T, Ozaka M, Sasahira N. Modified FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy following gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:449. [PMID: 32434547 PMCID: PMC7238500 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06945-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is no established second-line treatment after failure of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) as a second-line therapy for MPC and to investigate prognostic factors for survival. Methods From 2015 to 2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients receiving mFFX for MPC after failure of GnP therapy. Patients were treated every 2 weeks with mFFX (intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, intravenous irinotecan 150 mg/m2, and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 for 46 h without bolus infusion). Results In total, 104 patients received mFFX. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2–9.8) and the progression-free survival (PFS) 3.9 months (95% CI 2.8–5.0). The objective response rate was 10.6% and the disease control rate 56.7%. The median relative dose intensities of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and infusional 5-FU were 80.0% (range 21.5–100%), 77.2% (range 38.1–100%), and 85.9% (range 36.9–100%), respectively. Grade 3–4 toxicities were reported in 57 patients (54.8%), including neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Glasgow prognostic score and carcinoembryonic antigen level were independently associated with survival. Our prognostic model using these parameters could classify the patients into good (n = 38), intermediate (n = 47), and poor (n = 19) prognostic groups. The median OS and PFS time was 14.7 (95% CI 7.6–16.3) and 7.6 months (95% CI 4.1–10.5) for the good prognostic factors, 6.5 (95% CI 5.5–10.0) and 3.6 months (95% CI 2.7–4.8) for the intermediate prognostic factors and 5.0 (95% CI 2.9–6.6) and 1.7 months (95% CI 0.9–4.3) for the poor prognostic factors, respectively. Conclusions The mFFX showed to be a tolerable second-line treatment for MPC after GnP failure. Our prognostic model might be useful for deciding whether mFFX is indicated in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Sawada
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Kasuga
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. .,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Takafumi Mie
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takaaki Furukawa
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takanobu Taniguchi
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Koshiro Fukuda
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Yuto Yamada
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Takeda
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Ryo Kanata
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Masato Matsuyama
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takashi Sasaki
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Naoki Sasahira
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
The evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine vs. capecitabine therapy in the second-line setting for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with poor performance status. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jons.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
25
|
Pusceddu S, Ghidini M, Torchio M, Corti F, Tomasello G, Niger M, Prinzi N, Nichetti F, Coinu A, Di Bartolomeo M, Cabiddu M, Passalacqua R, de Braud F, Petrelli F. Comparative Effectiveness of Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in the First-Line Setting of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:E484. [PMID: 30959763 PMCID: PMC6520876 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11040484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) and the combination of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) are valid first-line options for advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). However, no randomized trials comparing the two schemes have been performed. This meta-analysis aims to compare GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX in terms of safety and effectiveness, taking into account data from real-life studies on mPC. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library up to November 2018 to identify retrospective or cohort studies on mPC comparing GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX. We included 16 retrospective studies, including 3813 patients (2123 treated with GEM-NAB and 1690 treated with FOLFIRINOX). Despite a median weighted overall survival (OS) difference in favor of FOLFIRINOX (mean difference: 1.15, 95% confidence interval CI 0.08⁻2.22, p = 0.03), in whole population OS was similar (hazard ratio (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.84⁻1.16; p = 0.9). PFS was also not different between the two arms (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.71⁻1.1; p = 0.26). The overall response rate was similar (25 vs. 24% with GEM-NAB and FOLFIRINOX). Among grade 3⁻4 toxicities, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and nausea were lower with GEM-NAB, while neurotoxicity and anemia were lower with FOLFIRINOX. In conclusion, despite a numerically longer median OS with FOLFIRINOX as compared to GEM-NAB, the overall risk of death and progression were similar. Their toxicity was different with less nausea, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia with GEM-NAB, as compared to less neurotoxicity and anemia with FOLFIRINOX. Therefore, analysis of non-randomized "real world" studies to date has not provided evidence of a major benefit of one regimen over the other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Pusceddu
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Michele Ghidini
- Medical Oncology Department, ASST Cremona, 26100 Cremona, Italy.
| | - Martina Torchio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesca Corti
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Monica Niger
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Natalie Prinzi
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Federico Nichetti
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Coinu
- Medical Oncology Department, Ospedale San Francesco, ASSL Nuoro, 08100 Nuoro, Italy.
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
| | - Mary Cabiddu
- Medical Oncology and Hemato-Oncology Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Bergamo, Italy.
| | | | - Filippo de Braud
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
- Department, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
| | - Fausto Petrelli
- Medical Oncology and Hemato-Oncology Department, ASST Bergamo Ovest, 24047 Bergamo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|