Drug similarity search based on combined signatures in gene expression profiles

Computational drug repurposing by exploiting large-scale gene expression data: Strategy, methods and applications

De novo drug development is an extremely complex, time-consuming and costly task. Urgent needs for therapies of various diseases have greatly accelerated searches for more effective drug development methods. Luckily, drug repurposing provides a new and effective perspective on disease treatment. Rapidly increased large-scale transcriptome data paints a detailed prospect of gene expression during disease onset and thus has received wide attention in the field of computational drug repurposing. However, how to efficiently mine transcriptome data and identify new indications for old drugs remains a critical challenge. This review discussed the irreplaceable role of transcriptome data in computational drug repurposing and summarized some representative databases, tools and strategies. More importantly, it proposed a practical guideline through establishing the correspondence between three gene expression data types and five strategies, which would facilitate researchers to adopt appropriate strategies to deeply mine large-scale transcriptome data and discover more effective therapies.

Analysis and identification of drug similarity through drug side effects and indications data

BACKGROUND

The measurement of drug similarity has many potential applications for assessing drug therapy similarity, patient similarity, and the success of treatment modalities. To date, a family of computational methods has been employed to predict drug-drug similarity. Here, we announce a computational method for measuring drug-drug similarity based on drug indications and side effects.

METHODS

The model was applied for 2997 drugs in the side effects category and 1437 drugs in the indications category. The corresponding binary vectors were built to determine the Drug-drug similarity for each drug. Various similarity measures were conducted to discover drug-drug similarity.

RESULTS

Among the examined similarity methods, the Jaccard similarity measure was the best in overall performance results. In total, 5,521,272 potential drug pair's similarities were studied in this research. The offered model was able to predict 3,948,378 potential similarities.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, we propose the current method as a robust, simple, and quick approach to identifying drug similarity.

Determining similarities of COVID-19 - lung cancer drugs and affinity binding mode analysis by graph neural network-based GEFA method

COVID-19 is a worldwide health crisis seriously endangering the arsenal of antiviral and antibiotic drugs. It is urgent to find an effective antiviral drug against pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars-Cov-2), which increases global health concerns. As it can be expensive and time-consuming to develop specific antiviral drugs, reuse of FDA-approved drugs that provide an opportunity to rapidly distribute effective therapeutics can allow to provide treatments with known preclinical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicity profiles that can quickly enter in clinical trials. In this study, using the structural information of molecules and proteins, a list of repurposed drug candidates was prepared again with the graph neural network-based GEFA model. The data set from the public databases DrugBank and PubChem were used for analysis. Using the Tanimoto/jaccard similarity analysis, a list of similar drugs was prepared by comparing the drugs used in the treatment of COVID-19 with the drugs used in the treatment of other diseases. The resultant drugs were compared with the drugs used in lung cancer and repurposed drugs were obtained again by calculating the binding strength between a drug and a target. The kinase inhibitors (erlotinib, lapatinib, vandetanib, pazopanib, cediranib, dasatinib, linifanib and tozasertib) obtained from the study can be used as an alternative for the treatment of COVID-19, as a combination of blocking agents (gefitinib, osimertinib, fedratinib, baricitinib, imatinib, sunitinib and ponatinib) such as ABL2, ABL1, EGFR, AAK1, FLT3 and JAK1, or antiviral therapies (ribavirin, ritonavir-lopinavir and remdesivir).Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Computing Drug-Drug Similarity from Patient-Centric Data

In modern biology and medicine, drug-drug similarity is a major task with various applications in pharmaceutical drug development. Various direct and indirect sources of evidence obtained from drug-centric data such as side effects, drug interactions, biological targets, and chemical structures are used in the current methods to measure the level of drug-drug similarity. This paper proposes a computational method to measure drug-drug similarity using a novel source of evidence that is obtained from patient-centric data. More specifically, patients' narration of their thoughts, opinions, and experience with drugs in social media are explored as a potential source to compute drug-drug similarity. Online healthcare communities were used to extract a dataset of patients' reviews on anti-epileptic drugs. The collected dataset is preprocessed through Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and four text similarity methods are applied to measure the similarities among them. The obtained similarities are then used to generate drug-drug similarity-based ranking matrices which are analyzed through Pearson correlation, to answer questions related to the overall drug-drug similarity and the accuracy of the four similarity measures. To evaluate the obtained drug-drug similarities, they are compared with the corresponding ground-truth similarities obtained from DrugSimDB, a well-known drug-drug similarity tool that is based on drug-centric data. The results provide evidence on the feasibility of patient-centric data from social media as a novel source for computing drug-drug similarity.

Identification and ranking of important bio-elements in drug-drug interaction by Market Basket Analysis

Introduction: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are the main causes of the adverse drug reactions and the nature of the functional and molecular complexity of drugs behavior in the human body make DDIs hard to prevent and threat. With the aid of new technologies derived from mathematical and computational science, the DDI problems can be addressed with a minimum cost and effort. The Market Basket Analysis (MBA) is known as a powerful method for the identification of co-occurrence of matters for the discovery of patterns and the frequency of the elements involved. Methods: In this research, we used the MBA method to identify important bio-elements in the occurrence of DDIs. For this, we collected all known DDIs from DrugBank. Then, the obtained data were analyzed by MBA method. All drug-enzyme, drug-carrier, drug-transporter and drug-target associations were investigated. The extracted rules were evaluated in terms of the confidence and support to determine the importance of the extracted bio-elements. Results: The analyses of over 45000 known DDIs revealed over 300 important rules from 22 085 drug interactions that can be used in the identification of DDIs. Further, the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme family was the most frequent shared bio-element. The extracted rules from MBA were applied over 2000000 unknown drug pairs (obtained from FDA approved drugs list), which resulted in the identification of over 200000 potential DDIs. Conclusion: The discovery of the underlying mechanisms behind the DDI phenomena can help predict and prevent the inadvertent occurrence of DDIs. Ranking of the extracted rules based on their association can be a supportive tool to predict the outcome of unknown DDIs.

Synergy from gene expression and network mining (SynGeNet) method predicts synergistic drug combinations for diverse melanoma genomic subtypes

Systems biology perspectives are crucial for understanding the pathophysiology of complex diseases, and therefore hold great promise for the discovery of novel treatment strategies. Drug combinations have been shown to improve durability and reduce resistance to available first-line therapies in a variety of cancers; however, traditional drug discovery approaches are prohibitively cost and labor-intensive to evaluate large-scale matrices of potential drug combinations. Computational methods are needed to efficiently model complex interactions of drug target pathways and identify mechanisms underlying drug combination synergy. In this study, we employ a computational approach, SynGeNet (Synergy from Gene expression and Network mining), which integrates transcriptomics-based connectivity mapping and network centrality analysis to analyze disease networks and predict drug combinations. As an exemplar of a disease in which combination therapies demonstrate efficacy in genomic-specific contexts, we investigate malignant melanoma. We employed SynGeNet to generate drug combination predictions for each of the four major genomic subtypes of melanoma (BRAF, NRAS, NF1, and triple wild type) using publicly available gene expression and mutation data. We validated synergistic drug combinations predicted by our method across all genomic subtypes using results from a high-throughput drug screening study across. Finally, we prospectively validated the drug combination for BRAF-mutant melanoma that was top ranked by our approach, vemurafenib (BRAF inhibitor) + tretinoin (retinoic acid receptor agonist), using both in vitro and in vivo models of BRAF-mutant melanoma and RNA-sequencing analysis of drug-treated melanoma cells to validate the predicted mechanisms. Our approach is applicable to a wide range of disease domains, and, importantly, can model disease-relevant protein subnetworks in precision medicine contexts.

Quantitative Identification of Compound-Dependent On-Modules and Differential Allosteric Modules From Homologous Ischemic Networks

Module‐based methods have made much progress in deconstructing biological networks. However, it is a great challenge to quantitatively compare the topological structural variations of modules (allosteric modules [AMs]) under different situations. A total of 23, 42, and 15 coexpression modules were identified in baicalin (BA), jasminoidin (JA), and ursodeoxycholic acid (UA) in a global anti‐ischemic mice network, respectively. Then, we integrated the methods of module‐based consensus ratio (MCR) and modified Z_summary module statistic to validate 12 BA, 22 JA, and 8 UA on‐modules based on comparing with vehicle. The MCRs for pairwise comparisons were 1.55% (BA vs. JA), 1.45% (BA vs. UA), and 1.27% (JA vs. UA), respectively. Five conserved allosteric modules (CAMs) and 17 unique allosteric modules (UAMs) were identified among these groups. In conclusion, module‐centric analysis may provide us a unique approach to understand multiple pharmacological mechanisms associated with differential phenotypes in the era of modular pharmacology.

Entropy-based divergent and convergent modular pattern reveals additive and synergistic anticerebral ischemia mechanisms

Module-based network analysis of diverse pharmacological mechanisms is critical to systematically understand combination therapies and disease outcomes. We first constructed drug-target ischemic networks in baicalin, jasminoidin, ursodeoxycholic acid, and their combinations baicalin and jasminoidin as well as jasminoidin and ursodeoxycholic acid groups and identified modules using the entropy-based clustering algorithm. The modules 11, 7, 4, 8 and 3 were identified as baicalin, jasminoidin, ursodeoxycholic acid, baicalin and jasminoidin and jasminoidin and ursodeoxycholic acid-emerged responsive modules, while 12, 8, 15, 17 and 9 were identified as disappeared responsive modules based on variation of topological similarity, respectively. No overlapping differential biological processes were enriched between baicalin and jasminoidin and jasminoidin and ursodeoxycholic acid pure emerged responsive modules, but two were enriched by their co-disappeared responsive modules including nucleotide-excision repair and epithelial structure maintenance. We found an additive effect of baicalin and jasminoidin in a divergent pattern and a synergistic effect of jasminoidin and ursodeoxycholic acid in a convergent pattern on "central hit strategy" of regulating inflammation against cerebral ischemia. The proposed module-based approach may provide us a holistic view to understand multiple pharmacological mechanisms associated with differential phenotypes from the standpoint of modular pharmacology.

NFFinder: an online bioinformatics tool for searching similar transcriptomics experiments in the context of drug repositioning

Drug repositioning, using known drugs for treating conditions different from those the drug was originally designed to treat, is an important drug discovery tool that allows for a faster and cheaper development process by using drugs that are already approved or in an advanced trial stage for another purpose. This is especially relevant for orphan diseases because they affect too few people to make drug research de novo economically viable. In this paper we present NFFinder, a bioinformatics tool for identifying potential useful drugs in the context of orphan diseases. NFFinder uses transcriptomic data to find relationships between drugs, diseases and a phenotype of interest, as well as identifying experts having published on that domain. The application shows in a dashboard a series of graphics and tables designed to help researchers formulate repositioning hypotheses and identify potential biological relationships between drugs and diseases. NFFinder is freely available at http://nffinder.cnb.csic.es.