1
|
Gregory TV, Ellis K, Valeriani R, Khan F, Wu X, Murin L, Alibayov B, Vidal AGJ, Zhao T, Vidal JE. MoWa: A Disinfectant for Hospital Surfaces Contaminated With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Other Nosocomial Pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:676638. [PMID: 34295834 PMCID: PMC8291128 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.676638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Staphylococcus aureus strains, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), are a main cause of nosocomial infection in the world. The majority of nosocomial S. aureus-infection are traced back to a source of contaminated surfaces including surgery tables. We assessed the efficacy of a mixture of levulinic acid (LA) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), hereafter called MoWa, to eradicate nosocomial pathogens from contaminated surfaces. Methods and Results A dose response study demonstrated that MoWa killed 24 h planktonic cultures of S. aureus strains starting at a concentration of (LA) 8.2/(SDS) 0.3 mM while 24 h preformed biofilms were eradicated with 32/1.3 mM. A time course study further showed that attached MRSA bacteria were eradicated within 4 h of incubation with 65/2 mM MoWa. Staphylococci were killed as confirmed by bacterial counts, and fluorescence micrographs that were stained with the live/dead bacterial assay. We then simulated contamination of hospital surfaces by inoculating bacteria on a surface prone to contamination. Once dried, contaminated surfaces were sprayed with MoWa or mock-treated, and treated contaminated surfaces were swabbed and bacteria counted. While bacteria in the mock-treated samples grew at a density of ~104 cfu/cm2, those treated for ~1 min with MoWa (1.0/0.04 M) had been eradicated below limit of detection. A similar eradication efficacy was obtained when surfaces were contaminated with other nosocomial pathogens, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, or Staphylococcus epidermidis. Conclusions MoWa kills planktonic and biofilms made by MRSA and MSSA strains and showed great efficacy to disinfect MRSA-, and MSSA-contaminated, surfaces and surfaces contaminated with other important nosocomial pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler V. Gregory
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
- Biomedical Sciences Master of Science Program, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
| | - Karen Ellis
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Renzo Valeriani
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Faidad Khan
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
| | - Xueqing Wu
- Department of Infectious Disease, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Landon Murin
- Base Pair Program Murrah- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
| | - Babek Alibayov
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
| | - Ana G. Jop Vidal
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
| | - Tong Zhao
- Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, United States
| | - Jorge E. Vidal
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Inactivation of parasite transmission stages: Efficacy of treatments on foods of non-animal origin. Trends Food Sci Technol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
3
|
Zhou M, Doyle MP, Chen D. Combination of levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate on inactivation of foodborne microorganisms: A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2019; 60:2526-2531. [PMID: 31397170 DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1650249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The combination of levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in recent years has shown considerable promise as an antimicrobial intervention. Both ingredients have been designated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) for being used as a flavoring agent and multipurpose food additive, respectively. The use of levulinic acid and SDS alone has limited antimicrobial efficacy on tested microorganisms, and synergism between levulinic acid and SDS has been observed. The postulated mechanism of action of the synergistic effect is presented. The antimicrobial efficacy of levulinic acid plus SDS remains high even when organic materials are present. The other features, including penetration, foamability, and being readily soluble, extend its potential applications to disinfection of difficult-to-access areas and control of foodborne pathogens both in a planktonic state and in a biofilm. These features indicate that the levulinic acid plus SDS combination may have the potential to be applied within the food processing environment on a large scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manli Zhou
- College of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.,National Demonstration Center for Experimental Food Science and Technology Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
| | - Michael P Doyle
- Center for Food Safety, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA, USA
| | - Dong Chen
- College of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.,National Demonstration Center for Experimental Food Science and Technology Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Julien-Javaux F, Gérard C, Campagnoli M, Zuber S. Strategies for the safety management of fresh produce from farm to fork. Curr Opin Food Sci 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cofs.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
7
|
Gaseous ozone treatment of baby spinach within the existing production chain for inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7. J FOOD ENG 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
8
|
Pyatkovskyy T, Shynkaryk M, Yousef A, Sastry SK. Reduction of Escherichia coli
O157:H7 population on baby spinach leaves by liquid sanitizers. J FOOD PROCESS ENG 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.12479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Taras Pyatkovskyy
- Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering; The Ohio State University; 590 Woody Hayes Dr. Columbus OH
| | - Mykola Shynkaryk
- Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering; The Ohio State University; 590 Woody Hayes Dr. Columbus OH
| | - Ahmed Yousef
- Department of Food Science and Technology; The Ohio State University; 2015 Fyffe Ct Columbus OH
| | - Sudhir K. Sastry
- Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering; The Ohio State University; 590 Woody Hayes Dr. Columbus OH
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shynkaryk MV, Pyatkovskyy T, Mohamed HM, Yousef AE, Sastry SK. Physics of Fresh Produce Safety: Role of Diffusion and Tissue Reaction in Sanitization of Leafy Green Vegetables with Liquid and Gaseous Ozone-Based Sanitizers. J Food Prot 2015; 78:2108-16. [PMID: 26613904 DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Produce safety has received much recent attention, with the emphasis being largely on discovery of how microbes invade produce. However, the sanitization operation deserves more attention than it has received. The ability of a sanitizer to reach the site of pathogens is a fundamental prerequisite for efficacy. This work addresses the transport processes of ozone (gaseous and liquid) sanitizer for decontamination of leafy greens. The liquid sanitizer was ineffective against Escherichia coli K-12 in situations where air bubbles may be trapped within cavities. A model was developed for diffusion of sanitizer into the interior of produce. The reaction rate of ozone with the surface of a lettuce leaf was determined experimentally and was used in a numerical simulation to evaluate ozone concentrations within the produce and to determine the time required to reach different locations. For aqueous ozone, the penetration depth was limited to several millimeters by ozone self-decomposition due to the significant time required for diffusion. In contrast, gaseous sanitizer was able to reach a depth of 100 mm in several minutes without depletion in the absence of reaction with surfaces. However, when the ozone gas reacted with the produce surface, gas concentration was significantly affected. Simulation data were validated experimentally by measuring ozone concentrations at the bottom of a cylinder made of lettuce leaf. The microbiological test confirmed the relationship between ozone transport, its self-decomposition, reaction with surrounding materials, and the degree of inactivation of E. coli K-12. Our study shows that decontamination of fresh produce, through direct contact with the sanitizer, is more feasible with gaseous than with aqueous sanitizers. Therefore, sanitization during a high-speed washing process is effective only for decontaminating the wash water.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mykola V Shynkaryk
- Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering, Ohio State University, 590 Woody Hayes Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Taras Pyatkovskyy
- Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering, Ohio State University, 590 Woody Hayes Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Hussein M Mohamed
- Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering, Ohio State University, 590 Woody Hayes Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Ahmed E Yousef
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Ohio State University, 2015 Fyffe Court, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Sudhir K Sastry
- Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering, Ohio State University, 590 Woody Hayes Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beuchat LR, Mann DA, Alali WQ. Evaluation of sanitizers for inactivating Salmonella on in-shell pecans and pecan nutmeats. J Food Prot 2012; 75:1930-8. [PMID: 23127701 DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-12-133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Chlorine, organic acids, and water extracts of inedible pecan components were tested for effectiveness in killing Salmonella on pecans. In-shell pecans and nutmeats (U.S. Department of Agriculture medium pieces) were immersion inoculated with a mixture of five Salmonella serotypes, dried to 3.7% moisture, and stored at 4°C for 3 to 6 weeks. In-shell nuts were immersed in chlorinated water (200, 400, and 1,000 μg/ml), lactic acid (0.5, 1, and 2%), and levulinic acid (0.5, 1, and 2%) with and without 0.05% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and a mixed peroxyacid sanitizer (Tsunami 200, 40 μg/ml) for up to 20 min at 21°C. The rate of reduction of free chlorine in conditioning water decreased as the ratio of in-shell nuts/water was increased. The rate of reduction was more rapid when nuts were not precleaned before treatment. The initial population of Salmonella on in-shell nuts (5.9 to 6.3 log CFU/g) was reduced by 2.8 log CFU/g after treating with chlorinated water (1,000 μg/ml). Treatment with 2% lactic acid plus SDS or 2% levulinic acid plus SDS reduced the pathogen by 3.7 and 3.4 log CFU/g, respectively. Lactic and levulinic acids (2%) without SDS were less effective (3.3- and 2.1-log CFU/g reductions, respectively) than acids with SDS. Treatment with Tsunami 200 resulted in a 2.4-log CFU/g reduction. In-shell nuts and nutmeats were immersed in water extracts of ground pecan shucks (hulls), shells, a mixture of shells and pith, and pith. The general order of lethality of extracts to Salmonella was shuck < shell-pith ≤ shell ≤ pith < chlorine (400 μg/ml) and shuck < shell ≤ pith = shell-pith < chlorine (400 μg/ml). Results emphasize the importance of removing soil and dust on in-shell pecans before conditioning in chlorinated water and the need for sanitizers with increased effectiveness in killing Salmonella on pecans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larry R Beuchat
- Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223-1797, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|