Trends and Disparities in Inpatient Rehabilitation of Adolescents: The Effect of Demographics, Injury Characteristics, and Facility Type

A systematic review of racial health disparities among children and youth with physical disabilities

PURPOSE

Children and youth who belong to a racially minoritized group commonly experience multiple and complex forms of discrimination and health disparities. The purpose of this review was to explore racial disparities in health care and health outcomes among children and youth with physical disabilities.

METHODS

Six international databases (Ovid Medline, Healthstar, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched and screened for inclusion. A narrative synthesis was used to identify the common trends.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria, which involved 218 555 children and youth with various types of physical disabilities spanning over 29 years. We noted the following trends: (1) racial disparities in accessing or receiving care; (2) racial disparities in health outcomes and mortality rates; and (3) factors affecting racial disparities. Most studies reported at least one finding indicating that racially minoritized youth had differential access to care and/or disparities in health outcomes compared to white youth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the concerning racial disparities among children and youth with physical disabilities within health care. There is an urgent need for advocacy and interventions at multiple levels to address the perpetual racism and racial disparities that racially minoritized youth with physical disabilities experience.Implications for rehabilitationThere is an urgent need for health care leaders and health care providers to address the systemic health inequalities in rehabilitation for racially minoritized children and youth with physical disabilities.Health care leaders and clinicians should recognize the racial disparities that racially minoritized youth with physical disabilities encounter in accessing or receiving care in addition to health outcomes.Health care leaders and decision-makers should advocate for policy change to optimize equitable and inclusive health care to enhance the well-being of racially minoritized children with disabilities.Health care providers should engage in training to understand how to recognize and address how intersectional forms of a child's identity such as disability, race, and socio-economic status can influence health care experiences and health outcomes.

Management of Pediatric Type III Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Cohort Study Utilizing the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database

BACKGROUND

Pediatric open tibial fractures represent a challenging subset of injuries with limited literature to guide management. For children, the epidemiology, management, and outcomes of tibial-shaft fractures have not been fully described.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Data Bank from 2017-2020 was used to query demographics, injury patterns, and management strategies in pediatric open tibial fractures. Fractures were compared by age group (0-5, 6-12, 13-17 years) and type (I/II vs type III). A subgroup analysis was performed on patients with type III open fractures.

RESULTS

A total of 3480 open tibial fractures were identified, 3049 were type I/II, and 431 were type III. Motor vehicle accidents (48%) were the most common mechanism of injury (P < 0.001). Subanalysis of 128 type IIIb/c tibial fractures revealed local flap reconstruction (25%) skin graft (25%), and free tissue transfer were the most common management strategies and soft-tissue coverage was achieved after 162 hours (interquartile range = 109-231). Negative pressure wound therapy was utilized in 63% of cases but used in isolation in only 23% of cases. Immediate fixation with intramedullary nailing was more frequently used in the 13-17 age group while plate fixation was more commonly used in younger age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Soft-tissue management patterns following open tibial shaft fractures mirror those seen in adult cohorts. The median time to achieve soft-tissue coverage exceeds the traditional 72-hour target advocated by Godina. Age-based variation is seen in orthopedic management of these fractures based on growth maintenance concerns.

Setting an agenda for a national pediatric trauma system: Operationalization of the Pediatric Trauma State Assessment Score

ABSTRACT

Pediatric trauma system development is essential to public health infrastructure and pediatric health systems. Currently, trauma systems are managed at the state level, with significant variation in consideration of pediatric needs. A recently developed Pediatric Trauma System Assessment Score (PTSAS) demonstrated that states with lower PTSAS have increased pediatric mortality from trauma. Critical gaps are identified within six PTSAS domains: Legislation and Funding, Access to Care, Injury Prevention and Recognition, Disaster, Quality Improvement and Trauma Registry, and Pediatric Readiness. For each gap, a recommendation is provided regarding the necessary steps to address these challenges. Existing national organizations, including governmental, professional, and advocacy, highlight the potential partnerships that could be fostered to support efforts to address existing gaps. The organizations created under the US administration are described to highlight the ongoing efforts to support the development of pediatric emergency health systems.It is no longer sufficient to describe the disparities in pediatric trauma outcomes without taking action to ensure that the health system is equipped to manage injured children. By capitalizing on organizations that intersect with trauma and emergency systems to address known gaps, we can reduce the impact of injury on all children across the United States.

Understanding Disparities in the Pediatric ICU: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Health disparities are pervasive in pediatrics. We aimed to describe disparities among patients who are likely to be cared for in the PICU and delineate how sociodemographic data are collected and categorized.

METHODS

Using MEDLINE as a data source, we identified studies which included an objective to assess sociodemographic disparities among PICU patients in the United States. We created a review rubric, which included methods of sociodemographic data collection and analysis, outcome and exposure variables assessed, and study findings. Two authors reviewed every study. We used the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework to organize outcome and exposure variables.

RESULTS

The 136 studies included used variable methods of sociodemographic data collection and analysis. A total of 30 of 124 studies (24%) assessing racial disparities used self- or parent-identified race. More than half of the studies (52%) dichotomized race as white and "nonwhite" or "other" in some analyses. Socioeconomic status (SES) indicators also varied; only insurance status was used in a majority of studies (72%) evaluating SES. Consistent, although not uniform, disadvantages existed for racial minority populations and patients with indicators of lower SES. The authors of only 1 study evaluated an intervention intended to mitigate health disparities. Requiring a stated objective to evaluate disparities aimed to increase the methodologic rigor of included studies but excluded some available literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Variable, flawed methodologies diminish our understanding of disparities in the PICU. Meaningfully understanding and addressing health inequity requires refining how we collect, analyze, and interpret relevant data.

Social determinants of health and disparities in pediatric trauma care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDH), including "the conditions in which individuals are born, grow, work, live and age" affect child health and well-being. Several studies have synthesized evidence about the influence of SDH on childhood injury risks and outcomes. However, there is no systematic evidence about the impact of SDH on accessing care and quality of care once a child has suffered an injury. We aim to evaluate the extent to which access to care and quality of care after injury are affected by children and adolescents' SDH.

METHODS

Using Cochrane methodology, we will conduct a systematic review including observational and experimental studies evaluating the association between social/material elements contributing to health disparities, using the PROGRESS-Plus framework: place of residence, race/ethnicity/culture/language, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socioeconomic status, and social capital and care received by children and adolescents (≤ 19 years of age) after injury. We will consult published literature using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Academic Search Premier and grey literature using Google Scholar from their inception to a maximum of 6 months prior to submission for publication. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment for included studies. The risk of bias will be assessed using the ROBINS-E and ROB-2 tools respectively for observational and experimental study designs. We will analyze data to perform narrative syntheses, and if enough studies are identified, we will conduct a meta-analysis using random effects models.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review will provide a synthesis of evidence on the association between SDH and pediatric trauma care (access to care and quality of care) that clinicians and policymakers can use to better tailor care systems and promote equitable access and quality of care for all children. We will share our findings through clinical rounds, conferences, and publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023408467.