Psychometric Arabic Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22: validation and translation in chronic rhinosinusitis patients

Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation in Polish-speaking patients

PURPOSE

There are many specific instruments for assessing the quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Of all these tests, the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) is the most widely used internationally. The purpose of the study was linguistic adaptation and validation of the SNOT-22 scale in the Polish language.

METHODS

The SNOT-22 was adapted into Polish and was administered to 148 subjects (108 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and 40 asymptomatic controls. Seventy-one patients completed the SNOT-22 a second time to evaluate test-retest reliability. The Polish SNOT-22 was assessed for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity, criterion validity, and sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

The Polish SNOT-22 exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties. A high Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α = 0.89) was obtained. Significantly higher scores (p < 0.01) were revealed in the Study Group with a median score of 32 (range 15-53) points in comparison with controls: 5 (range 0-20). A moderate correlation was found between SNOT-22 and the Lund-Kennedy test score (r = 0.334; p < 0.001) and a strong correlation between SNOT-22 and the Lund-Macay test score (r = 0.469; p < 0.001). The best cut-off point was set at a 16 score with a sensitivity of 0.981 and a specificity of 0.995. The determined Area Under Curve (AUC = 0.997; p < 0.001) confirms the diagnostic accuracy of the Polish SNOT-22.

CONCLUSIONS

The Polish version of the SNOT-22 is a valid and reliable tool for measuring health-related quality of life in patients with CRSwNP in the Polish-speaking population.

Is SNOT-22 a Reliable Tool During Periods of High Stress? A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of a major crisis, such as the October 7, 2023, terror attack, on SNOT-22 scores, especially the extra-rhinologic subdomains.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Rhinology Clinic in a Tertiary University Hospital. Patients who visit our Rhinology Clinic routinely complete the SNOT-22, a widely employed questionnaire designed for evaluating health-related quality of life in individuals with rhinologic conditions. Patients were divided into two groups: 5 weeks before the October 7 terror attack and 5 weeks after. Primary outcomes for analyses included the Sedaghat Subdomain model of the SNOT-22. Descriptive analysis and Welch's t-test were used to compare SNOT-22 subdomain scores between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients completed the SNOT-22 questionnaire, with 60 before and 99 after October 7, 2023. A general decrease in average scores was observed across all subdomains, with a significant decrease in the Nasal subdomain (p = 0.0388). Subgroup analysis showed an increase in the Ear/Facial subdomain in Arabic and the Sleep and Function subdomains in English, though not statistically significant. In sex-based sub-analysis, female patients showed a significant decrease in the Emotions subdomain.

CONCLUSION

Our study was unable to establish a direct link between the terror attack and specific SNOT-22 subdomains. However, the observed trends suggest that SNOT-22 may display variability or unreliability when used during periods of high stress.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Laryngoscope, 2024.

Functional Outcomes of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study Using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-16 Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis affects a large portion of the adult population, and its symptoms can be burdensome to patients' quality of life. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is usually required after medical therapies fail.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the outcomes of FESS in a tertiary hospital using the modified Arabic Sinonasal Outcome Test.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study involved administering an electronic questionnaire, the modified Arabic Sinonasal Outcome Test-16, pre-operatively to patients diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent FESS. This test was subsequently resent six weeks post-operatively. Scores were calculated by adding the total score of the 16 questions. The lowest possible score was 0, and the highest score was 48. Pre- and post-operative scores were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included, with a mean age of 37.3±14.6. Our findings showed that FESS significantly improved all symptoms except cough and exophthalmos (p < 0.001). Nose congestion had the highest improvement score, with 78.6% of patients experiencing better symptoms. Lack of good night sleep was the second most ameliorated symptom, with 75% of patients showing improvement.

CONCLUSION

Modified Arabic Sinonasal Outcome Test scores were significantly improved after FESS. Therefore, primary treatment with FESS should be considered for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. However, further studies are recommended to investigate the long-term benefits of FESS and the impact of comorbidities, such as asthma and allergic rhinitis, on outcomes.

Patient perspectives on recall period and response options in patient-reported outcome measures for chronic rhinosinusitis symptomatology: An international multi-centered study

BACKGROUND

Existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) use a variety of recall periods and response scales to assess CRS symptom burden. Global perspectives of CRS patients regarding optimal recall periods and response scales for CRS PROMs are unknown.

METHODS

This was a multi-center, cross-sectional study recruiting 461 CRS patients from sites across the United States, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, and Austria. Participants chose which CRS symptom recall period (1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, >1 month) was most reflective of their current disease state and upon which to best base treatment recommendations (including surgery). Participants also chose which of six response scales (one visual analogue scale and five Likert scales ranging from four to eight items) was easiest to use, understand, and preferred.

RESULTS

A plurality of participants (40.0%) felt their CRS symptoms' current state was best reflected by a 1-month recall period. However, most patients (56.9%) preferred treatment recommendations to be determined by symptoms experienced over a >1 month period. The four- and five-item Likert scales were the easiest to understand (26.0% and 25.4%, respectively) and use (23.4% and 26.7%, respectively). The five-item (26.4% rating it most preferred and 70.9% rating it preferred) and four-item Likert (22.3% rating it most preferred and 56.4% rating it preferred) response scales were most preferred.

CONCLUSION

Future PROMs for CRS should consider assessment of symptoms over a 1-month period and use a four- or five-item Likert response scale to reflect global patient preferences. These findings also inform interpretation of current CRS PROMs.

Efficacy of povidone-iodine nasal rinse and mouth wash in COVID-19 management: a prospective, randomized pilot clinical trial (povidone-iodine in COVID-19 management)

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To assess the efficacy of 0.23% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) nasal rinses and mouth washes on detectability of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus and cycle threshold (Ct) values in nasopharyngeal swabs.

STUDY DESIGN

This was an open-label, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

The study was conducted in King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from August 2021 to July 2022.

METHODS

Participants diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 were randomly assigned to one of three groups, with participants receiving either 0.23% PVP-I, 0.9% normal saline (NS) nasal rinses and mouth washes, or no intervention (control group). Nasopharyngeal swabs were taken 4, 8, 12, and 18 days after the first swab to measure the detectability of the virus and the Ct.

RESULTS

A total of 19 participants were involved in this study. The mean viral survival was 9.8, 12, and 12.6 days for the PVP-I, NS, and control groups, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.046). The Ct mean values were 23 ± 3.4, 23.5 ± 6.3, and 26.3 ± 5.9 at the time of recruitment and 25.2 ± 3.5, 15 ± 11.7, and 26.9 ± 6.4 after 4 days for the PVP-I, NS, and control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

When used continuously at a concentration of 0.23%, PVP-I showed promising results in terms of decreasing the pandemic burden by reducing the period of infectiousness and viral load. However, the use of PVP-I did not result in significantly different changes in the quality-of-life parameters in recently vaccinated and mild COVID-19 patients.

Does Managing Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Improve Their Depression Score? Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

To assess the risk of depression in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in a tertiary care center and the effect of treatment on depression scores.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between November 2021 and June 2022 and included adult patients (≥14 years) with CRS. The validated Arabic or English Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were used before treatment and 3 to 6 months after surgery and maximal medical treatment. PHQ-9 scores were compared at baseline and follow-up visits. The relationship between changes in SNOT-22 and PHQ-9 scores were assessed using Spearman's correlation and simple linear regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 38 participants with a mean ± SD age of 32.7 ± 12 years were enrolled. CRS with nasal polyps (55.26%) was the most frequently seen condition, followed by allergic fungal CRS (31.58%) and CRS without nasal polyps (13.16%). Six patients (15.7%) had PHQ-9 scores ≥10, indicating they had major depressive disorder. PHQ-9 and SNOT-22 scores improved significantly after treatment (3.7 ± 5.8 vs 6.5 ± 6.9 pretreatment, P = .001; 20.7 ± 20.5 vs 45.6 ± 28.9 pretreatment, P < .0001, respectively). Mean ± SD change in PHQ-9 and SNOT-22 scores was -2.7 ± 7 and -24.9 ± 29.8, respectively. SNOT-22 and PHQ-9 scores were positively correlated (r = .522, P < .001). PHQ-9 score change was significantly associated with SNOT-22 score change (β = .178, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.23, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

CRS affects the quality of life and psychological well-being of patients. Patient-centered care with maximal medical and surgical treatment help overcome its deleterious consequences.

Cross-cultural modification of the University of Pennsylvania smell identification test for the Saudi Arabian population: Validation and normative values

OBJECTIVES

To develop a reliable version of the Saudi Arabian-University of Pennsylvania smell identification test (SA-UPSIT) and to establish normative values for both genders.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was carried out on voluntarily recruited normal participants in King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from April 2018 to May 2023. Culture-familiar odors were chosen and the kit was translated into Arabic for the study. The test was modified 3 times in 4 versions. Following this, a random sample was collected to carry out a re-test after 6 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 288 subjects participated in the development of the SA-UPSIT across all versions, including 146 females and 142 males. The average age of the participants was 28.4±9.9 years. In the final version, 111 participants scored an average of 34.5±2.5 for the total score, 35±2.3 for females, and 34.1±2.6 for males. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.73, indicating acceptable reliability.

CONCLUSION

The new changes carried out to the SA-UPSIT increased the average scores and demonstrated good reliability, making it clinically applicable for diagnosing and monitoring olfactory dysfunction.

Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) in the Pan-Arab Region: Consensus Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Expert Working Group

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic and often debilitating inflammatory condition of the nasal and paranasal tissues. An expert panel of specialists from the Gulf region (the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and the United Arab Emirates) and from Egypt gathered to evaluate existing guidance and develop regional guidance on the management of CRSwNP through a consensus approach. The present article presents the main observations and recommendations from this panel. CRSwNP diagnosis requires the presence of bilateral, endoscopically visualized polyps in the middle meatus (via nasal endoscopy or CT). In most patients, CRSwNP is mediated through predominantly type 2 inflammatory processes and is often observed in patients with asthma and other allergic disease. While many patients respond to medical treatment (principally topical irrigation and intranasal corticosteroids, and adjunctive short-term use of systemic corticosteroids), clinical management of CRSwNP is challenging, and a multidisciplinary approach for complete evaluation and treatment is recommended. Patients with more severe/uncontrolled disease (despite adequate medical therapies) require a complete endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), although outcomes can be unsatisfactory, and further revision surgery is common. Biological therapies targeting underlying inflammatory processes offer additional, effective treatment options for those patients with persistent symptoms despite complete ESS, and also in those patients where surgery may be contraindicated.

Experience of People With Chronic Sinusitis During COVID-19 Lockdown in Saudi Arabia: Insights and Lessons

Background This study aims to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 lockdown period on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) symptoms control. Methodology This cross-sectional study was carried out on adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who visited King Abdulaziz University Hospital within six months before the lockdown starting date. Background information, including patients' diagnosis, presence of rhinitis, number of previous surgeries, and medications, was collected. CRS symptom burden was measured using a validated Arabic version of the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Study participants were required to complete the survey two months after the start of the lockdown. Results Out of 66 patients, 43 agreed to participate. The majority of respondents (34, 75.6%) were diagnosed with CRS with nasal polyps. The study revealed no differences between pre- and post-lockdown total symptom scores. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the health system worldwide in many ways. Regarding the scope of our study, CRS symptoms, fortunately, did not worsen with the pandemic. This is considered the first reported study to assess such symptom control among people with CRS in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 lockdown period.

Evaluation of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Symptoms' Severity Following COVID-19 Infection: A Retrospective Analysis

Objectives This study aims to compare the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) symptoms pre- and post-COVID-19 infection and estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of intranasal corticosteroids (ICS) among adult CRS patients. Methods This was an observational retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between July 2022 and October 2022. Adult CRS patients with sino-nasal outcomes test-22 (SNOT-22) scores documented prior to March 2020, marking the occurrence of Saudi Arabia's initial reported case of COVID-19, were requested to complete the SNOT-22 questionnaire following COVID-19 infection. A comparison was subsequently made between the two scores obtained. Results The study enrolled a total of 33 patients, with 16 assigned to the control group and 17 with a history of COVID-19 infection. The mean age of the patients was 43 years, and the majority (52%) were males. Statistical analysis did not reveal any statistically significant differences in the total SNOT-22 scores or domain-level scores between the two groups. Furthermore, the use of ICS during the COVID-19 pandemic did not show any significant associations, except for patients with asthma, where 80% of them used ICS during the pandemic (p=0.0073). Conclusion There was no statistically significant disparity observed in the SNOT-22 scores between patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and those who did not. The use of corticosteroids during the COVID-19 pandemic was found to be more prevalent in this study compared to previous studies conducted before the pandemic, particularly among patients with asthma. The use of ICS during the pandemic was not associated with the presence of polyps, functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), allergic rhinitis, or eczema.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures in Arabic speaking countries: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly recognized as an indicator of healthcare quality and safety. Over the past decades, there has been a growing interest in using PROMs in Arabic-speaking populations. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the quality of their cross-cultural adaptation (CCA) and measurement properties.

OBJECTIVES

To identify PROMs that have been developed, validated or cross-culturally adapted to Arabic and evaluate methodological qualities of CCA and measurement properties.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, IPA, and ISI Web of Science were searched using search terms 'PROMs', 'Arabic countries', 'CCA', and 'psychometric properties'. Measurement properties were evaluated using COSMIN quality criteria and CCA quality was assessed using the Oliveria rating method.

RESULTS

This review included 260 studies with 317 PROMs, focusing on psychometric testing (83.8%), CCA (75.8%), utilizing PROMs as outcome measures (13.4%), and developing PROMs (2.3%). Out of the 201 cross-culturally adapted PROMs, forward translation was the most frequently reported component of CCA (n = 178), followed by back translation (n = 174). Out of the 235 PROMs that reported measurement properties, internal consistency was the most frequently reported measurement property (n = 214), followed by reliability (n = 160) and hypotheses testing (n = 143). Other measurement properties were less reported, including responsiveness (n = 36), criterion validity (n = 22), measurement error (n = 12), and cross-cultural validity (n = 10). The strongest measurement property was hypotheses testing (n = 143), followed by reliability (n = 132).

CONCLUSION

There are several caveats regarding the quality of CCA and measurement properties of PROMs included in this review. Only 1 out of 317 Arabic PROMs met CCA and psychometric optimal quality criteria. Therefore, there is a need to improve the methodological quality of CCA and measurement properties of PROMs. This review provides valuable information for researchers and clinicians when choosing PROMs for practice and research. There were only 5 treatment-specific PROMs, indicating the necessity for more research focusing on development and CCA of such measures.

Development and Validation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-12

OBJECTIVES

Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires are widely used in clinical interviews to assess the impact of medical interventions or measure the outcomes of healthcare services. The main aim of such questionnaires is the subjective assessment of health status and its impact on QoL. This study aimed to develop an efficient, short sinonasal disease assessment instrument, the sinonasal outcomes test-12 (SNOT-12), and to compare it with the preexisting SNOT-22.

METHODS

This was a two-phase cross-sectional study. The study was performed between June 2019 and February 2020 using the electronic files of the ORL department outpatient clinics at King Fahd University Hospital, affiliated with Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. The study was performed in 2 phases: an item reduction phase, which resulted in an initial SNOT-12 scale, and a validation phase, using a comparative analysis of the initial SNOT-12 and the SNOT-22.

RESULTS

The developed short-form SNOT-12 maintained the 4 latent factors extracted in EFA (nasal, Sleep/extra nasal, psychological, ear/facial). It strongly correlated with SNOT-22 (r = 0.973). It had good construct reliability (0.705-0.901) and validity and a higher discrimination power than the SNOT-22.

CONCLUSIONS

The SNOT-12 is a short, valid, and reliable instrument that may prove useful for the initial screening and monitoring of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Validation of the Dutch version of the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22)

Background: The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) is a widely used questionnaire to measure disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The Dutch version has not been validated yet. Methods: The SNOT-22 was translated through a forward-backward translation technique and validated by a test-retest protocol in CRS patients, a responsiveness analysis in CRS patients treated with dupilumab, while using healthy individuals as controls. Results: The Dutch SNOT-22 showed excellent test-retest properties, good responsiveness to treatment with dupilumab, and a clear distinction between outcomes of CRS patients and healthy controls. Conclusion: The Dutch version of the SNOT-22 is a valid outcome measure in CRS patients.

Expert Opinion on Biological Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in the Gulf Region

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is defined as the inflammation of nose and paranasal sinuses, affecting the patients' quality of life and productivity. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a principal clinical entity confirmed by the existence of chronic sinonasal inflammation and is characterized by anterior or posterior rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, hyposmia and/or facial pressure or facial pain. Several epidemiologic studies have revealed wide variations in the incidence of CRS among regions globally ranging from 4.6% to 12%. The Gulf countries are also witnessing an unprecedented burden of CRSwNP. According to the current clinical guidelines, glucocorticosteroids and antibiotics are the principal pharmacotherapeutic approaches. Endoscopic sinus surgery is recommended for those who have failed maximal pharmacotherapy. Recently, biologics are considered as an alternative best approach due to the complications associated with medical therapy and surgery. However, precise data on the clinical position of biologic agents in the management of CRSwNP in the Gulf region is not available. The present review article addresses the current diagnostic and management approaches for CRSwNP and also emphasizes the role of emerging biologics in the current treatment strategies for CRSwNP in the Gulf region. Further, a consensus protocol was convened to rationalize the guideline recommendations, strategize the best practices with biologics, and develop clinical practice guidelines for all primary-care specialists in the Gulf region. The consensus-based report will be a useful reference tool for primary-care physicians in primary-healthcare settings, regarding the appropriate time for the initiation of biological treatment in the Gulf region.

Patterns of Otorhinolaryngological Manifestations of Covid-19: A Longitudinal Questionnaire-Based Prospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia

Objective:

Many studied investigated the manifestations of COVID-19, yet few described the pattern and severity of otolaryngological symptoms. We aim to describe the picture of COVID-19-associated otorhinolaryngological manifestations and recovery to explore individualized treatment, onward referral, and complications prevention.

Design:

Prospective longitudinal questionnaire-based study.

Setting:

The online questionnaire was filled 3 times through a remote interview over a period of 1 month from June 2020 to July 2020.

Participants:

Patients with confirmed COVID-19 by RT-PCR who were clinically stable.

Main Outcome Measures:

Date of diagnosis, sociodemographic data, and the presence of predictive factors, such as nasal and paranasal disease, anosmia and dysgeusia. Validated tools were used, such as Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), smell test (medical academy screening tool), Voice Handicap Index (VHI), and Reflux Symptoms Index (RSI).

Result:

The questionnaire was sent to 363 patients and the response rate was 70.80% (n = 257). The mean age was 34.58 years (SD = 11.22) and the rate of male participants was 60.7%. The most common otorhinolaryngological symptoms at the time of enrollment was fever (48.6%), whilst the commonest severe symptom was cough (57%). After 1 month, only 11 participants had persistent severe symptoms, especially sleep and psychological symptoms (73%), and the majority were female (63.6%). All of them had at least 1 comorbidity. There was a significant difference between the mean age of participants with severe symptoms (mean = 27.45, SD = 8.39) and without severe symptoms (mean = 34.90, SD = 2.53, t(255) = 2.17, P = .031).

Conclusion:

COVID-19 has a wide-ranged spectrum of presentations, with otorhinolaryngological symptoms being the commonest and most serious. Studying these symptoms is vital to advance management options.

Persistent Parosmia Caused By COVID-19 Infection: An Emerging Symptom

Objectives

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with several known signs and symptoms, including olfactory disturbances leading to anosmia and parosmia. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features of the emerging symptoms of post-COVID-19 parosmia and to report the outcome of commonly used intervention methods.

Methods

The study’s sample included post-COVID-19 patients who complained of parosmia, presented to otorhinolaryngology clinics at private tertiary care hospitals from December 2020 to April 2021. Patients’ data were collected from the hospital system and through direct phone interviews. The Modified Arabic 20-Items Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (MA-SNOT-20) was used to measure the severity of rhinosinusitis symptoms.

Results

Twenty-one patients were included in the study, and their ages mainly ranged between 20 and 39 years (76.2%), predominantly females 19 (90.5%). Post the COVID-19 illness course, nearly half of the patients (9; 42.9%) reported full recovery of olfaction and taste senses. Nine cases (42.9%) received treatment with intranasal and oral steroids, of which only three cases (14.3%) noticed improvement. The remaining 12 cases (57.1%) did not receive any treatment, two of which improved (9.5%). The maximum MA-SNOT score was 37 while the minimum was 3, and eight patients (38.1%) scores were between one and 10 points.

Conclusion

Olfactory and taste dysfunctions are common symptoms of COVID-19. The emerging symptom of parosmia is worth reporting in the literature to increase the awareness of this particular symptom in this pandemic era. Many management strategies have been introduced that might be effective. However, further studies are needed to establish evidence-based management protocols.

Anterior part middle turbinoplasty in endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Resection of middle turbinate in the setting of endoscopic sinus surgery is a controversial procedure. Our aim is to assess the impact of the anterior part middle turbinoplasty on the outcome of endoscopic sinus surgery, incidence of synechia between the middle turbinate and the lateral nasal wall, intra- and post-operative accessibility to the paranasal sinuses.

METHODS

Single blinded randomized controlled study of 120 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without polyps, they were allocated into two groups, we performed anterior part middle turbinoplasty in the group one "60 patients", and we preserved the middle turbinate in the group two "60 patients". We assessed the patients pre-operatively by Sino-nasal outcome Test (SNOT-22), intra-operatively by Likert scale score for the sinuses accessibility. At least 6 months post-operatively, we assessed the patients by SNOT-22, and Likert scale score for sinus accessibility.

RESULTS

During and after surgery, the Likert scale score in the group one showed statistically significant better sinuses accessibility than in the group two. We noticed synechia between the MT and the lateral nasal wall in 9.2% and 18.2% of the operated sides in group one and group two, respectively. SNOT-22 and its smell item improved significantly in both groups with no statistically significant differences between them. No major complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Anterior part middle turbinoplasty is a safe and effective technique during endoscopic sinus surgery to improve the intra- and post-operative sinus accessibility, and decrease the incidence of post-operative synechia, with no adverse effect on olfaction or bleeding.

Pattern of symptom improvement following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammation of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. Intractable CRS cases are generally treated with endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Although the effect of ESS on CRS symptoms has been studied, the pattern of symptom improvement after ESS for CRS is yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude and sequence of symptom improvement after ESS for CRS, and to assess the possible preoperative factors that predict surgical outcomes in CRS patients.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal prospective study of 68 patients who had CRS (with or without nasal polyps). The patients underwent ESS at King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia. The Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire was used for assessment at four time points during the study: pre-ESS, 1-week post-ESS, 4 weeks post-ESS, and 6 months post-ESS.

RESULTS

The difference between the mean scores recorded for the five SNOT-22 domains pre-ESS and 6 months post-ESS were as follows: rhinologic symptoms (t-test = 7.22, p-value =  < 0.001); extra-nasal rhinologic symptoms (t-test = 4.87, p-value =  < 0.001); ear/facial symptoms (t-test = 6.34, p-value =  < 0.001); psychological dysfunction (t-test = 1.99, p-value = 0.049); and sleep dysfunction (t-test = 5.58, p-value =  < 0.001). There was a significant difference between the mean scores recorded for the five domains pre-ESS and 6 months post-ESS. Rhinologic symptoms had the largest effect size (d = 1.12), whereas psychological dysfunction had the least effect size (d = 0.24). The only statistically significant difference in the SNOT-22 mean scores recorded 4 weeks post-ESS was observed between allergic and non-allergic patients (t = - 2.16, df = 66, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Understanding the pattern of symptom improvement following ESS for CRS will facilitate patient counselling and aid the optimization of the current treatment protocols to maximize surgical outcomes and quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective observational.

Assessment of health-related quality-of-life in patients with chronic Rhinosinusitis - Validation of the German Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (German-SNOT-22)

PURPOSE

The Sino-Nasal-Outcome-Test-22 (SNOT-22) represents the reference questionnaire to assess symptoms, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) and treatment-response in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The SNOT-22 has been validated for various languages, yet no validation is available for the German version. Thus, we provide a validation of the SNOT-22 for German.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study 139 CRS-patients and 36 control-participants were included. CRS-patients completed the German-SNOT-22 before treatment (T0) and four (T1), twelve (T2) and 48 weeks after inclusion (T3). At T0, Mackay-Naclerio-, Lund-Mackay- and Brief-Symptom-Inventory-18 (BSI-18) scores were collected as external reference for the German-SNOT-22 and its subscales. At T1, T2, and T3 health-transition-items (HTIs) were raised to explore responsivity. Control-participants completed the German-SNOT-22 at T0. Reliability (internal consistency, item-total correlation), validity (concurrent validity, discriminatory validity) and responsiveness (distribution- and anchor-based) were explored for the German-SNOT-22.

RESULTS

At T0, the mean German-SNOT-22 total-score for CRS patients was 38.0 (± 20.9) and responded to treatment (T1 = 26.3 ± 19.1; T2 = 25.8 ± 20.6; T3 = 20.5 ± 16.3). For control-participants, the mean total-score at T0 was 15.1 (±10.9). The German-SNOT-22 was reliable (excellent internal consistency α = 0.93; good overall item-total correlations r = 0.39-0.85), valid (significant correlations between Mackay-Naclerio-, Lund-Mackay- and BSI-18 scores, all r > 0.39, p < 0.01) and responsive (significant correlations between HTIs and mean change in German-SNOT-22 total-score F = 9.57, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The German-SNOT-22 validated here matches the original SNOT-22. It is a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to assess symptoms, HRQOL and treatment-response in CRS-patients. Good psychometric properties were observed.

Impact of Nasal Irrigation With Iodized Table Salt Solution on Mucociliary Clearance: Proof-of-Concept Randomized Control Trial

Introduction

Saline nasal irrigation is a common recommendation shared between the majority of clinical guidelines for sinusitis and rhinitis in adults and children. Studies involving homemade saline have typically involved the use of noniodized salt. However, the literature does not contain any descriptions for the use of iodized table salt in homemade saline solutions.

Objectives

To study the usefulness of iodized salt in homemade saline and its impact on mucociliary clearance (MCC).

Methods

Only healthy volunteers were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. The sinonasal outcome test (SNOT)-22 and rhinoscopy were used to rule out any clinical evidence of sinusitis or rhinitis in the enrolled subjects. The saccharine clearance time (SCT) was used to evaluate MCC at baseline. Each candidate received 2 different nasal wash solutions—one containing iodized salt and the other containing noniodized salt—on different days. Visual analog scale pain scores were recorded while using each type of nasal wash. The SCT was assessed after each wash.

Results

Thirty-eight healthy candidates (18 men and 20 women) were enrolled in the study. All subjects were in their 30s. The mean baseline SCT was 10.92 minutes. The use of the noniodized salt solution led to a nonsignificant change ( P = .139) in mean SCT (9.68 min). In contrast, a significant change ( P = .035) was observed in mean SCT after the use of the iodized salt solution (9.06 min). However, the mean postirrigation SCT was not significantly different between solutions ( P = .31). No significant differences were observed in pain/discomfort experience between solutions.

Conclusion

MCC improved with both solutions. Interestingly, the improvement was significant, when the iodized salt nasal irrigation solution was used. This finding contradicts the conventional recommendation against the use of iodized salt in nasal rinse solution. Moreover, this solution was well tolerated. Further studies regarding the long-term safety are recommended.

Woakes' syndrome

Woakes' syndrome is a rare entity defined as recurrent sinonasal polyposis with a consequent nasal pyramid deformity. Only a few cases are reported in the literature. The goal of this study is to present the features of Woakes' syndrome through a clinical case. A 42-year-old man presented with a history of ASA triad. He started self-medication for 5 years. He returned to the otorhinolaryngology department for the aggravation and persistence of symptoms. CT scans showed the deformity and thinning of the nasal bones. A functional endoscopic sinus surgery and correction of nasal pyramid deformity were performed. At 6 months' follow-up, good functional and aesthetic outcomes were observed. Woakes' syndrome was described more than 130 years ago. Treatment includes endoscopic sinonasal surgery and local treatment. Adequate management and good adherence to the therapeutic protocol could be factors to prevent this syndrome.