Outcomes and hospital admission patterns in patients with diabetes during Ramadan versus a non-fasting period

Ramadan intermittent fasting is associated with improved anticoagulant activity among healthy people: a case-control study

Data on the pathophysiological mechanisms of hemostatic alterations in the thrombotic events that occur during Ramadan intermittent fasting (RIF), particularly in the natural coagulation inhibitors, are very limited. Thus, our objective was to evaluate the effect of RIF on the natural anticoagulants level, antithrombin, protein C, and total and free protein S (PS) in healthy participants. Participants were divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 29 healthy fasting participants whose blood samples were taken after 20 days of fasting. Group II included 40 healthy non-fasting participants whose blood samples were taken 2-4 weeks before the month of Ramadan. Coagulation screening tests including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and plasma fibrinogen level, natural anticoagulants; antithrombin, protein C, free and total PS and C4 binding protein (C4BP) levels were evaluated in the two groups. High levels of total and free PS without change in antithrombin, protein C, and C4BP levels were noted in the fasting group as compared with non-fasting ones (p < 0.05). PT and APTT showed no difference between the two groups. However, the fibrinogen level was higher in the fasting group. In conclusion, RIF was found to be associated with improved anticoagulant activity in healthy participants, which may provide temporal physiological protection against the development of thrombosis in healthy fasting people.

Verification of 2021 IDF-DAR risk assessment tool for fasting Ramadan in patients with diabetes attending primary health care in The Kingdom of Bahrain: The DAR-BAH study

BACKGROUND

There is a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus among Muslim adult patients. Those Muslims are required to fast the holy month of Ramadan. However, the Islam religion exempted some people with medical issues. It was not clear if all the patients with diabetes were considered medically unfit to fast Ramadan. Therefore, IDF-DAR group created a new risk calculator to categorize the patients with diabetes to advise with or against fasting accordingly.

OBJECTIVE

This study is validating the IDF-DAR tool in assessing the accuracy of IDF-DAR risk calculator tool on adult patients with diabetes visiting primary health care in the Kingdom of Bahrain. The study will facilitate the health care professionals' decision to exempt the patients from fasting.

METHODS

It is a prospective, randomized study for Ramadan 1444/2023 to assess the new IDF-DAR risk score tool that predicts the complications and the negative outcome of fasting during Ramadan. It included pre- and post-Ramadan questionnaires. 757 patients were selected randomly from the patients list of the central diabetes clinics in primary health care for pre-Ramadan risk assessment scoring. Post-Ramadan a phone a questionnaire was done to evaluate the ability of fasting and the occurrence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Out of the 757 participants, 611 were included in the study. The mean age of the studied population was 59.8 years and 52.8 % of them were female. 630 (95.3 %) had type 2 diabetes. According to the new IDF-DAR risk calculator, 184 (27.8 %) were categorized as low risk (≤3 score), 252 (38.1 %) as moderate risk (3-6 score), and 225 (34 %) as high risk (>6 score). The percentage of patients completed their 30 days fasting successfully without reporting adverse events in the low, moderate, and high-risk groups were 92.4 %, 89.3 %, 74.7 % respectively. There was significant increased risk in breaking the fast between the low-risk group and high-risk group with a p-value of <0.001. Similarly, there was significant increased risk in breaking the fast between the moderate-risk group and high-risk group with p-value of <0.001. The main reason of breaking the fast was hypoglycemic attacks. The leading factors that play a significant role in increasing the risk of adverse events during fasting Ramadan were type 1 diabetes mellitus, the presence of previous hypoglycemia attacks, the presence of renal impairment, and negative previous Ramadan experience.

CONCLUSION

The new IDF-DAR risk calculator is a good tool to predict both the ability to fast Ramadan and the probability of experiencing adverse events (mainly hypoglycemia) in people with diabetes mellitus in Kingdom of Bahrain.

Demographics and Clinical Presentations of Patients Visiting the Emergency Department During the Holy Month of Ramadan: A Three-Year Retrospective Study in a Muslim-Majority Country

Background and objective Ramadan is the Muslim's holiest month; it is a time when believers engage in special practices that include fasting from dawn till dusk and making cultural and dietary modifications in their everyday lives. The impact of Ramadan on human activity, sleeping patterns, and circadian rhythms of hormones have been addressed in the literature. Fasting, which constitutes the main pillar of practices during Ramadan and lasts from sunrise to sunset, can significantly affect common health conditions, leading many to seek medical care in the Emergency Department (ED). Hence, it is important to understand the pattern of ED visits and understand the impact caused by fasting during this holy month in a Muslim-majority country. In light of this, this study aimed to gather new insights into the pattern of ED visits during Ramadan at a busy tertiary care center in the period from 2019 to 2021. Methods This study was conducted by reviewing the hospital health information system to gather relevant information in May 2022. Data of patients who visited the ED during Ramadan were collected, as well as during a month prior to and after Ramadan for the purpose of comparison. Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical profiles were collected for analysis.  Results The total number of ED visits in the three months of Ramadan during the study period (three years) was 33,142, all of which were included in our analysis. Sociodemographic data were analyzed for patients who visited the ED during the month of Ramadan and the two lunar months that precede and succeed Ramadan (Shaban and Shawal). Fever was the most common complaint (16.5%), followed by abdominal pain (14%). When analyzing the findings based on patient age groups, fever was found to be the most prevalent complaint in both adults (15.6%) and pediatric patients (34.4%). Of the total ED patient visits, 7,527 patients were admitted for further care, and 197 patients deceased. Conclusion Our study findings illustrate the change in ED visit patterns during the month of Ramadan in a Muslim-majority country. Also, the type of complaints was affected significantly due to the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic during the study period. The outcomes in patients reflected substantial progress and outcomes in the ED. These findings highlight that analyzing ED data can help provide accurate information that can be used to help modify/adjust the quality of services provided in the ED. However, these modifications may affect all hospital facilities, not just the ED.

Burden and Patterns of Medical Emergencies during Ramadan Fasting: A Narrative Review

Introduction Acute medical problems may occur more frequently during Ramadan fasting (RF). We aimed to provide a narrative overview of the global literature on medical emergencies during RF.

Methods This is a nonsystematic review of the international literature from one major medical online database (PubMed, National Institutes of Health, United States). The relevant literature was narrated in a concise thematic account.

Results There is a variable impact in the burden and time distribution of emergency services and hospitalization during RF that may require readjustment of resource allocation. Studies of the risk of accidents and injuries may be increased overall or at specified times, around Iftar time. A classical impact of emergencies has been the risk of worsening peptic ulcer disease. RF impacts diabetic emergencies such as severe hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis, particularly in type 1 diabetes and poorly controlled patients. Glucocorticoid replacement therapy may represent a challenge to patients and physicians that require education and dose adjustment. Acute neurological conditions of interest include the “first day of Ramadan headache,” epilepsy, and strokes. Several studies evaluated the risk of the acute coronary syndrome and heart failure with inconsistent findings. RF may impact the renal and urological systems through stone disease, renal colic, and acute kidney. The impact on hematological conditions was mostly focused on the safety of anticoagulant therapy during Ramadan.

Conclusion The review addresses the emergency medical encounters of the fasting patient during Ramadan to allow a holistic and ethnically sensitive approach to medical care under circumstances where decisions have to be taken with no delay.

The effect of Ramadan on elderly patients presenting to the emergency department

Background Patients visiting the emergency department (ED) may show variations by certain time periods such as Ramadan. We wished to ascertain whether Ramadan affects the ED presentations, clinical conditions and outcomes of patients aged 65 years or older. Methods . Patients aged 65 years or older who presented to ED in Ramadan and in the following month in 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Results . A total of 1947 patients were enrolled, of whom 958 presented in Ramadan and 989 in the following month. The patients who presented in Ramadan most commonly (23.8%) presented between 8 p.m. and 11.59 p.m.; patients who presented in the following month most commonly (24%) presented between 8 a.m. and 11.59 a.m. (p=0.26). Complaints concerning the central nervous system (CNS) were more common in the month after Ramadan (p<0.0001). Diagnoses related to the cardiovascular system were more commonly made in Ramadan (p=0.037), whereas those related to CNS, otorhinolaryngology and oncology were more commonly made in the following month (p=0.0005, p=0.024 and p=0.003, respectively). No significant difference was found between the two groups with respect to outcomes (p=0.36). Compared to patients who presented in Ramadan, those that presented in the following month had a significantly longer ED stay (p=0.036). Conclusion . Our study detected no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the time of presentation and ED outcomes. Patients who presented in Ramadan had a lower incidence of CNS complaints; a higher incidence of cardiovascular diagnoses; lower incidences of CNS, oncological and otorhinolaryngological diagnoses and a significantly shorter length of ED stay.

Ramadan is not associated with increased infection risk in Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations: Findings from controlled interrupted time series analysis of UK primary care data

Background

The effect of fasting on immunity is unclear. Prolonged fasting is thought to increase the risk of infection due to dehydration. This study describes antibiotic prescribing patterns before, during, and after Ramadan in a primary care setting within the Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations in the UK, most of whom are Muslims, compared to those who do not observe Ramadan.

Method

Retrospective controlled interrupted time series analysis of electronic health record data from primary care practices. The study consists of two groups: Pakistanis/Bangladeshis and white populations. For each group, we constructed a series of aggregated, daily prescription data from 2007 to 2017 for the 30 days preceding, during, and after Ramadan, respectively.

Findings

Controlling for the rate in the white population, there was no evidence of increased antibiotic prescription in the Pakistani/Bangladeshi population during Ramadan, as compared to before Ramadan (IRR: 0.994; 95% CI: 0.988–1.001, p = 0.082) or after Ramadan (IRR: 1.006; 95% CI: 0.999–1.013, p = 0.082).

Interpretation

In this large, population-based study, we did not find any evidence to suggest that fasting was associated with an increased susceptibility to infection.

The impact of Ramadan on visits related to diabetes emergencies at a tertiary care center

Background

Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic calendar were Muslims fast from dawn until sunset. This prolonged fasting period might have an impact on patients with diabetes and their disease control. This study aimed to determine the variation in visits at the Emergency Room department (ER) during Ramadan in comparison with other lunar months at a tertiary care hospital in Jeddah city in relation to the diabetes emergencies.

Methodology

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using electronic medical record review of patients with diabetes emergencies who visited ER of a Military hospital, from 9th to 11th lunar months during 2017–2018. Diabetes patients who visited ER and aged more than 18 years old were included. Frequency of ER visits, sociodemographic characteristics and clinical features were determined. Chi-square test, Student ‘s t-test and one-way ANOVA at p < 0.05 were used in assessing associations between variables.

Results

Within the selected study period, a total of 24,498 admissions were recorded in ER. The prevalence of diabetes emergencies visits was only 0.84%. Based on inclusion criteria, a total of 133 subjects were included in the study (54.1% men, 45.9% women). Majority of whom (73.7%) were on insulin therapy, and more than half of whom (51.9%) were type 2 diabetes. There was a significant difference (p = 0.001) in the prevalence of diabetes emergencies visits between the three lunar months Shaban, Ramadan and Shawal, 7, 5 and 4%, respectively. However, the highest prevalence was not in Ramadan. Despite some correlations were identified, the study found no significant differences between frequency of ER visits and various demographic, clinical factors and diabetes profile between Ramadan and other both preceding and succeeding lunar month.

Conclusion

In contrary with previous studies, a downward trend of prevalence, from Shaban to Ramadan, to Shawal was found. This indicated that fasting during month of Ramadan does not impact negatively on the diabetes emergencies in comparison with other months. Hyperglycemia among type 2 diabetes and insulin treated patients were recorded the highest feature of diabetes emergences visits during the three months studied with no significant differences between the months. These findings highlight the need of type 2 and insulin treated patients to be thoroughly assess by the Primary Care physicians and in-depth health education and guidance should be given to them.

Ramadan fasting in people with type 1 diabetes during COVID-19 pandemic: The DaR Global survey

OBJECTIVES

The DaR Global survey was conducted to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the intentions to fast and the outcomes of fasting in <18 years versus ≥18 years age groups with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

Muslim people with T1DM were surveyed in 13 countries between June and August 2020, shortly after the end of Ramadan (23rd April-23rd May 2020) using a simple questionnaire.

RESULTS

71.1% of muslims with T1DM fasted during Ramadan. Concerns about COVID-19 were higher in individuals ≥18 years (p = 0.002). The number of participants who decided not to fast plus those who received Ramadan-focused education were significantly higher in the ≥18-year group (p < 0.05). Hypoglycemia (60.7%) as well as hyperglycemia (44.8%) was major complications of fasting during Ramadan in both groups irrespective of age.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 pandemic had minor impact on the decision to fast Ramadan in T1DM cohort. This was higher in the age group of ≥18 years compared to those <18 years group. Only regional differences were noted for fasting attitude and behavior among T1DM groups. This survey highlights the need for Ramadan focused diabetes education to improve glucose control and prevent complications during fasting.

Impact of Ramadan on Emergency Department Patients Flow; a Cross-Sectional Study in UAE

Introduction:

Ramadan, the ninth month of the Islamic lunar calendar, is, to Muslims, the holiest month of the year. During this month, young, able-bodied Muslims are commanded to abstain from food and drink from dawn to dusk.

Objective:

The objective of the study is to analyze emergency department (ED) patients flow during the holy month of Ramadan and compare it to non-Ramadan days. We hypothesized that Ramadan would affect ED attendance by altering peak hours, and expected a dip in attendance around evening time (after sunset).

Methods:

In Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, a retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital (2014–2016). The data was strategically separated and patient presence was analyzed year-wise, weekday basis and based on the hourly presence of the patients in the ED of the chosen hospital.

Results:

A total of 45,116 ED’s patient visits were analyzed over the mentioned study period. There was a difference in the total volume of Ramadan and non-Ramadan patient between the years 2014–2016. In all of the years, the highest percentage of visits was during the non-Ramadan days and this had a small fluctuation from 53% in 2014 to 52% in 2016 (p=0.001). It was observed from the collected data that 53% of the patients were present in the hospital during the fasting hours whereas 47% were present during the non-fasting hours (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

We were successfully able to derive a pattern from the data of 3 years in relation to the patient flow in the ED of the hospital. Moreover, we observed the difference in the patient arrival pattern between the Ramadan and non-Ramadan days in the hospital along with the predominant categorization of patient chief complaints. Our study identified a unique pattern of ED hourly visits during Ramadan.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus who fast during Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefits and risks of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple daily injections (MDI) in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who fast during Ramadan are not known.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies conducted in PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library. Quality of included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool for risk of bias assessment and analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.1.

RESULTS

From 709 records, 306 full text studies were assessed. After exclusions, the final analysis included a total of 9 studies. Heterogeneity for outcomes was I² = 0%. There was no significant difference for the change in glycemic control (HbA_1c) between CSII and MDI (P > 0.05). There was no change in weight or the lipid profile in patients with T1DM on MDI during Ramadan. There were insufficient data to assess the impact on glucose profiles and the incidence of hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in patients on CSII or MDI during Ramadan.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies assessing the effect of CSII or MDI in patients with T1DM who fast during Ramadan are limited to observational studies and show no difference in the change in Hb_A1c, weight or lipids during Ramadan.