Evaluation of factors affecting survival rate in primary bone sarcomas with extremity and pelvis involvement

Delays in diagnosis and surgery of sarcoma patients during the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain

Background and objectives

Social distancing and quarantine implanted during the COVID-19 outbreak could have delayed the accession of oncologic patients to hospitals and treatments. This study analysed the management of sarcoma patients during this period in five Spanish hospitals.

Design and methods

Clinical data from adult sarcoma patients, soft tissue and bone sarcomas, managed during the COVID-19 outbreak, from 15 March to 14 September 2020 (Covid cohort), were retrospectively collected and time for diagnosis, surgery and active treatments were compared with sarcoma patients managed during the same pre-pandemic period in 2018 (Control cohort).

Results

A total of 126 and 182 new sarcoma patients were enrolled in the Covid and Control cohorts, respectively, who were mainly diagnosed as soft tissue sarcomas (81.0% and 80.8%) and at localized stage (80.2% and 79.1%). A diagnostic delay was observed in the Covid cohort with a median time for the diagnosis of 102.5 days (range 6-355) versus 83 days (range 5-328) in the Control cohort (p = 0.034). Moreover, a delay in surgery was observed in cases with localized disease from the Covid cohort with a median time of 96.0 days (range 11-265) versus 54.5 days (range 2-331) in the Control cohort (p = 0.034). However, a lower delay for neoadjuvant radiotherapy was observed in the Covid cohort with a median time from the diagnosis to the neoadjuvant radiotherapy of 47 days (range 27-105) versus 91 days (range 27-294) in the Control cohort (p = 0.039). No significant differences for adjuvant radiotherapy, neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant/adjuvant palliative chemotherapy were observed between both cohorts. Neither progression-free survival (PFS) nor overall survival (OS) was significantly different.

Conclusion

Delays in diagnosis and surgery were retrospectively observed in sarcoma patients during the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain, while the time for neoadjuvant radiotherapy was reduced. However, no impact on the PFS and OS was observed.

Delay in Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Bone Tumors during COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all of the medical specialties, including orthopedic oncology. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess how it influenced the diagnostic and therapeutic processes for patients with bone neoplasms.

METHODS

We evaluated 87 patients treated due for bone neoplasms before (Group I, n = 36) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (Group II, n = 51). A delay in diagnosis was defined as the period between the initial clinical symptoms and the date of referral to an oncology center. The patients from Group II were asked to complete a short questionnaire regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

The median general delay in diagnosis before the pandemic was 7 months, while during the pandemic, it was 10 months (p = 0.728). The biopsy delay was lower in the pre-pandemic group: median-6.5 vs. 12 days (p = 0.025). The patients from Group II were diagnosed with larger tumors compared to those in Group I: the median values were 75 vs. 56 mm (p = 0.025), respectively. After an X-ray examination, the bone neoplasms were suspected more frequently in the Group II: 63% vs. 44% cases (p = 0.024), respectively. In Group II, 20 (60.8%) cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported, however, no respiratory failure cases were noticed.

CONCLUSION

The pandemic affected the diagnostic process of primary bone tumors, resulting in delays in performing biopsies. During the pandemic, the patients reported larger diameters of their bone lesions.

The Outcome of Children With Malignant Bone Tumors: A Single-Center Experience

Malignant bone tumors (MBT) account for 3% to 5% of cancers in children younger than 15 years. We aimed to report the outcome of children with MBT in 10 years in Southern Iran. During the study period, 100 patients (57 Osteosarcoma, 43 Ewing sarcoma) with an M/F ratio of 1.56 and a median age of 13.8 years (3.8-17.9) were diagnosed. Metastasis occurred in 27% of patients, mostly in the first 3 months of diagnosis. The mean survival time of MBT altogether was 94.1 months (95% CI: 86.5-101.7). The 5-year overall survival and event-free survivals were 85.2% (95% CI: 74%-91.8%) and 69.2% (95% CI: 56%-79%), respectively. Metastasis was the only independent risk factor of death in our study cohort (Hazard ratio 36.7, 95% CI: 4.8-282.6, P = .001) MBT in children mostly occur in adolescent boys. About one-third of them become metastatic, which is significantly associated with poor outcomes.

Tricks and pitfalls in the surgical treatment of malignant bone tumours of the forearm in children and adolescents

Malignant bone tumours around the forearm are rare. Nowadays, oncological and surgical management of bone sarcomas of this region has improved significantly. Although the anatomical features are complex, limb-sparing surgery is possible with wide surgical resection. Biological reconstruction methods are promising in this anatomically unique region. In addition, meticulous soft-tissue reconstruction yields good functional results in the hand and wrist. This study reviews malignant bone tumours of the forearm and their oncological and surgical management. Malignant bone tumours should be treated with a multidisciplinary approach based on chemotherapy, radiotherapy and limb salvage procedures.

Knockdown of 91 H Suppresses the Tumorigenesis of Osteosarcoma via Inducing Methylation of CDK4 Promoter

Background:

Osteosarcoma is the most leading primary malignancy of the bone in adolescents all over the world. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) 91 H has been reported to participated in multiple cancers. Meanwhile, lncRNA 91 H has been proved to be upregulated in osteosarcoma. However, the function of 91 H in osteosarcoma remains unclear.

Methods:

Gene and protein expressions in osteosarcoma cells were detected by qRT-PCR and western blot, respectively. Cell viability was tested by CCK-8 assay. Ki67 staining was used to measure cell proliferation. Cell apoptosis and cycle were assessed by flow cytometry. In addition, transwell assay was used to detect cell migration and invasion. Furthermore, Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) was performed to test the methylation of CDK4 promoter. Finally, xenograft mice model was established to explore the role of 91 H in osteosarcoma in vivo.

Results:

Knockdown of 91 H significantly inhibited the growth of osteosarcoma cells via inducing the cell apoptosis. In addition, 91 H siRNA notably suppressed the migration and invasion of osteosarcoma cells. Meanwhile, knockdown of 91 H inhibited the progression of osteosarcoma via inducing methylation of CDK4 promoter. Furthermore, 91 H knockdown obviously induced G1 arrest in osteosarcoma cells via inhibition of PCNA and Cyclin D1. Finally, knockdown of 91 H notably inhibited the tumor growth of osteosarcoma in vivo.

Conclusion:

knockdown of 91 H suppressed the tumorigenesis of osteosarcoma via inducing methylation of CDK4 promoter in vitro and in vivo. Thus, 91 H may serve as a new target for the treatment of osteosarcoma.