Prognostic Factors in Stage IB Gastric Cancer after Surgical Resection

Esophageal cancer patient survival: A retrospective study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan

Objective

To determine the pattern, tumor characteristics of esophageal cancer (EC) and survival of esophageal carcinoma patients presenting to upper GI Unit at Dr. Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of histologically confirmed EC patients from 2016 to 2021 at Upper GI Unit - Dr. Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi. Data were collected using a filled Proforma, medical records, pathology reports and surgical notes, and patients or their family members were contacted for informed consent. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 16.0. Time to event was measured from the date of diagnosis to the date of the last follow-up or recorded death. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses, including Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, were employed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess independent predictors of survival.

Results

Total 152 patients with a median age of 45 (range 80-15) years were enrolled in this study. Clinical stages-III, IV-A and IV-B were identified in 35.5% (n = 54), 23.7% (n = 36) and 34.2% (n = 52), respectively. Total of 62% (n=94) had died at median follow up of 9.56 months and three years overall survival rate was 10.0%. Univariate survival analysis revealed that patients with clinical stage-II (p-value 0.002) and patients treated with combined surgery plus chemo-radiotherapy (p-value 0.040) was significantly associated with lower risk of mortality among other stages and treatment modality groups. Conversely, patients having metastasis (p value <0.001) and those with vascular involvement >90 degrees (p value <0.001) showed worse survival outcomes.

Conclusion

Our study reveals a three years survival rate of 10.0%, emphasizing the formidable challenge of advanced-stage malignancies. Clinical stage, vascular involvement, and metastasis emerged as significant predictors of mortality. Moreover, integrating surgery with chemo-radiotherapy significantly improved three years survival (36.8% vs. 14.2%). Despite single-center limitations, our findings provide crucial regional insights into esophageal carcinoma outcomes.

Association of survival with adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB gastric cancer: a multicentre, observational, cohort study

Background

Recurrence following radical resection in patients with stage IB gastric cancer (GC) is not uncommon. However, whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy could reduce the risk of recurrence in stage IB GC remains contentious.

Methods

We collected data on 2110 consecutive patients with pathologic stage IB (T1N1M0 or T2N0M0) GC who were admitted to 8 hospitals in China from 2009 to 2018. The survival of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy was compared with that of postoperative observation patients using propensity score matching (PSM). Two survival prediction models were constructed to estimate the predicted net survival gain attributable to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Findings

Of the 2110 patients, 1344 received adjuvant chemotherapy and 766 received postoperative observation. Following the 1-to-1 matching, PSM yielded 637 matched pairs. Among matched pairs, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival compared with postoperative observation (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.00; DFS: HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.64-1.29). Interestingly, in the subgroup analysis, reduced mortality after adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in the subgroups with elevated serum CA19-9 (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.57; P = 0.001 for multiplicative interaction), positive lymphovascular invasion (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.62; P < 0.001 for multiplicative interaction), or positive lymph nodes (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07-0.38; P < 0.001 for multiplicative interaction). The survival prediction models mainly based on variables associated with chemotherapy benefits in the subgroup analysis demonstrated good calibration and discrimination, with relatively high C-indexes. The C-indexes for OS were 0.74 for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and 0.70 for patients treated with postoperative observation. Two nomograms were built from the models that can calculate individualized estimates of expected net survival gain attributable to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Interpretation

In this cohort study, pathologic stage IB alone was not associated with survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy compared with postoperative observation in patients with early-stage GC. High-risk clinicopathologic features should be considered simultaneously when evaluating patients with stage IB GC for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China; the National Key R&D Program of China.

Risk stratification for predicting postoperative recurrence of gastric cancer by grade of venous invasion

BACKGROUND

Venous invasion (VI) in pathological examination of surgically resected gastric cancer (GC) may predict postoperative recurrence, but there are no objective criteria for VI grading.

METHODS

157 GC patients (pathological stages I 82, II 34, and III 41) who underwent surgery with curative intent were analyzed. VI was graded in pathological examination by elastica van Gieson staining based on the number of VIs per glass slide as follows: v0, 0; v1, 1-3; v2, 4-6; and v3, ≥ 7. Filling-type invasion in veins with a minor axis of ≥ 1 mm increased the grade by 1. The association of VI grade with prognosis was statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Recurrence increased with VI grade (v0 1.5%, v1 29.6%, v2 41.7%, v3 78.6%). VI grade as well as pathological (p) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage was a significant recurrence predictor by the multivariate Cox analysis. VI grade was implicated in hematogenous and peritoneal recurrences independent of pTNM stage but not in nodal recurrence. GC was then divided into two tiers, without indication of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) (pStage I, pT1 and pT3N0) and with AC indication (pStages remaining II/III), based on the ACTS-GC trial, which is common in Japan and East Asia. VI grade was a significant recurrence predictor in both tiers. v2/v3 revealed a significantly worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) than v0/v1 in GC without AC indication. v0/v1 exhibited RFS rate exceeding 95% even after 5 years but that of v2/v3 fell around 70% within one year postoperatively, suggesting that AC may be considered for this tier with v2/v3. GC with AC indication exhibited dismal RFS according to the VI grade. RFS rate fell below 80% within one year postoperatively when VI was positive, while recurrence was not observed in v0, which was, however, rare in this tier (10.9%). Differentiation grade did not significantly affect postoperative prognosis in both tiers.

CONCLUSIONS

VI grade was a significant predictor of postoperative GC recurrence irrespective of the AC indication based on the ACTS-GC study and this VI grading system could be applied in future studies of adjuvant therapy in GC presently deemed without AC indication in Japan.

The Impact of Venous Invasion on the Postoperative Recurrence of pT1-3N0cM0 Gastric Cancer

The impact of venous invasion (VI) on postoperative recurrence in pathological (p)T1-3N0 clinical (c)M0 gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. We investigated the association of VI grade with prognosis in 94 (78 stage I and 16 stage IIA) patients. VI was graded during pathological examinations based on the number of VIs per glass slide as follows: v0, 0; v1, 1-3; v2, 4-6; and v3, ≥7. Filling-type invasion in veins with a minor axis of ≥1 mm increased VI grade by 1. Four (4.3%) patients experienced recurrence. Recurrence increased with pT (pT1, 0.0%; pT2, 11.1%; pT3, 18.8%) and VI grade (v0, 0.0%; v1, 3.7%, v2, 14.3%; and v3, 40.0%). Recurrence was significantly more frequent in pT3 than pT1 and in v2 + v3 than v0 (p = 0.006 and 0.005, respectively). Kaplan-Meier curve analyses demonstrated a significant decrease in recurrence-free survival according to pT (p = 0.0021) and VI grade (p < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed a significant association of VI grade with recurrence (p = 0.049). These results suggest that VI grade is a potential recurrence predictor for pT1-3N0cM0 GC. No recurrence can be expected in cases with pT1 or VI grade v0. Adjuvant therapy might be considered for pT3 or VI grade v2 + v3.

A new scoring system to evaluate adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with T2N0M0 gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

At present, there is insufficient medical evidence to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for T2N0M0 gastric cancer.

AIM

To obtain a risk score to assess the need for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T2N0M0 gastric cancer.

METHODS

We identified 325 patients with pathological T2N0M0 stage primary gastric cancer at the National Cancer Center between 2011 and 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to predict factors affecting prognosis. Vascular invasion, tumor site, and body mass index were assessed, and a scoring system was established. We compared the survival outcomes and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy between the different subgroups.

RESULTS

Five-year survival rates of the score 0, 1, 2, and 3 groups were 92%, 95%, 80%, and 50%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the score 2-3 group, five-year survival rates for patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy group and postoperative observation group were 95% and 61%, respectively (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

For patients with T2N0M0 stage gastric cancer and two or more risk factors, adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy may have a survival benefit.

Meta-analysis of the relationship between lymphovascular invasion and prognosis of patients with stage I gastric cancer

Lymphovascular invasion is considered to be a high-risk pathological feature after radical resection of gastric cancer, but the relationship between lymphovascular invasion and the prognosis of stage I gastric cancer is still controversial. Therefore, we used meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the relationship between lymphovascular invasion and the prognosis of stage I gastric cancer. Up to September 2, 2021, the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2 researchers independently completed the screening of literature, extraction of data, and quality evaluation. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software merged with HR and 95%CI. A total of 7508 patients with stage I gastric cancer were included in 9 studies, and the positive rate of lymphovascular invasion was 17%. Lymphovascular invasion was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (univariate: HR = 4.05, 95%CI: 1.91-8.58; multivariate: HR = 2.10, 95%CI: 1.37-3.22) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (univariate: HR = 4.79, 95%CI: 2.30-9.99; multiple: HR = 2.17, 95%CI: 1.56-3.00). This study indicates that lymphovascular invasion is an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with stage I gastric cancer, and can be used as a reference index for postoperative adjuvant therapy.

The role of vascular invasion and lymphatic invasion in predicting recurrent thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Numerous studies have addressed lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in patients with thoracic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); however, little is known about the individual roles of lymphatic invasion (LI) and vascular invasion (VI). We aimed to analyse the prognostic significance of LI and VI in patients with thoracic ESCC from a single centre.

Methods

This retrospective study included 396 patients with thoracic ESCC who underwent oesophagectomy and lymphadenectomy in our hospital. The relationship between LI, VI and the other clinical features was analysed, and disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated. Survival analysis was performed by univariate and multivariate statistics.

Results

Briefly, VI and LI were present in 25.8% (102 of 396) and 23.7% (94 of 396) of ESCC patients, respectively, with 9.15% patients presenting both LI and VI; the remaining patients did not present LI or VI. We found that LI was significantly associated with pN stage (P<0.001) and pTNM stage (P<0.001), and similar results were found in VI. Moreover, survival analysis showed that pT stage (P<0.001), pN stage (P=0.001), pTNM stage (p<0.001), VI (P=0.001) and LI (P<0.001) were associated with DFS in ESCC. Furthermore, multivariate analysis suggested that pT stage (RR=1.4, P =0.032), pN stage (RR=1.9, P<0.001) and LI (RR=1.5, P=0.008) were independent predictive factors for DFS. Finally, relapse was observed in 110 patients (lymph node metastasis, 78 and distant, 32) and 147 patients with cancer-related deaths. Subanalysis showed that LI-positive patients had higher lymph node metastasis, although there was no significant difference (32.1% vs. 15.6%, P=0.100).

Conclusions

LI and VI were common in ESCC; they were all survival predictors for patients with ESCC, and LI was independent. Patients with positive LI were more likely to suffer lymph node metastasis.

Lymphangiosis carcinomatosa independently affects long-term survival of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

The significance of postoperatively diagnosed Lymphangiosis Carcinomatosa (L1) as an independent risk factor for long-term survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We analyzed the effect of L1 on postoperative survival in stage I, II and III NSCLC-patients.

METHODS

We investigated all consecutive patients with NSCLC between January 2012 and December 2019 who underwent an anatomical resection and radical lymphadenectomy at our institute. L1-were compared to L0-patients. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy in accordance with European guidelines. 3- and 5- year survival rates and median-survival were assessed. To investigate whether L1 is an independent risk factor, we carried out a multivariate cox regression and a pair-match analysis looking at different properties such as TNM.

RESULTS

A total of 641 patients (L0: 74%; L1: 26%) were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The mean age was 65.3 ± 10.2 years and 64.9 ± 9.4 years in the L0 and L1-groups respectively (p-value = 0.703). 58.5% of L0-patients were male (L1: 62.7%; p-value = 0.351). Overall survival in the L1-group was significantly shorter compared to the L0-group (L1: 42.3 ± 2.8; L0: 67.6 ± 2.1 months; p-value<0.0001). We confirmed this finding in a pair-matched analysis (L0: 73.9 ± 4.7 months; L1: 42.2 ± 4.2; p-value = 0.009). 3- and 5-year survival were significantly shorter for L1-patients (3-year: L0: 65.9%; L1: 35.9%; p-value<0.0001) (5-year: L0: 34.9%; L1: 7.5%; p-value<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

L1 is an independent risk factor for long-term survival of patients with NSCLC. This cohort supports that the L0/L1 status should be included in pathological reports. We suggest to further include L0/L1-status in guideline recommendations for NSCLC patients.