Outcomes of nondisplaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures with internal screw fixation in elderly patients: a systematic review

Preliminary clinical and radiological evaluation of osteosynthesis using the Femoral Neck System (FNS) for subcapital fractures of the femur

Addressing subcapital fractures of the femur poses a substantial clinical challenge, complicated by the diverse range of available osteosynthesis materials. This study is dedicated to a comprehensive analysis of the clinical and radiological implications linked with the implementation of the Femoral Neck System (FNS) in osteosynthesis procedures. A descriptive study was conducted involving patients who underwent osteosynthesis for subcapital fractures of the femur utilizing the FNS during the period from 2019 to 2022. The investigation encompassed various facets, including the classification of fractures according to the Garden and Pauwells classifications, criteria for achieving precise reduction based on the Garden criteria and Tip Apex Distance (TAD). At the one-year follow-up, factors such as fracture consolidation, loss of reduction, fracture collapse, complications, and functional outcomes were evaluated utilizing the Harris Hip Score (HHS) scale. The study cohort included a total of 26 patients, among whom 22 exhibited non-displaced subcapital femur fractures categorized as Garden I and II. Successful reduction was accomplished in 23 cases, in which 24 cases (92.3%) displayed a TAD measurement below 25 mm. According to the HHS, patients achieved an average score of 90.9 (ranging from 63 to 100) following the surgical intervention, with predominantly "excellent" and "good" outcomes. The outcomes derived from our investigation corroborate the viability of the Femoral Neck System (FNS) as a reliable option for osteosynthesis in femoral neck fractures. The results obtained are comparable to those achieved with other available implants, as highlighted by previous studies.

Patient-related Predictors for the Functional Outcome of SuperPATH Hemiarthroplasty versus Conventional Approach Hemiarthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Specialist literature lacks evidence that explores associations between patient characteristics and the beneficial treatment effect of SuperPATH hemiarthroplasty (HA) compared with conventional approach (CA) HA. To investigate and identify patient-related predictors of the effect size of the short-term functional outcome of SuperPATH HA and CA HA by performing a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic search of literature was performed in PubMed, CNKI, CENTRAL of The Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, and Google Scholar until August 25, 2023. For the continuous outcome parameter Harris hip score (HHS) ≤1 week and 3 months postoperatively, mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A meta-regression analysis was based on random-effects meta-analysis using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for continuous covariates. A total of five RCTs with 404 patients were found. The following predictors of HHS ≤1 week postoperatively were identified: patient age (predictor estimate = 1.29; p < 0.01), patient age groups (predictor estimate = 14.07; p < 0.01), time to mobilization (predictor estimate = 5.51; p < 0.01). The following predictors of HHS 3 months postoperatively were identified: incision length (predictor estimate = -2.12; p < 0.01); intraoperative blood loss (predictor estimate = 0.02; p < 0.01). Patient age, time to mobilization, incision length, and intraoperative blood loss were identified as predictors of the effect size of early postoperative functional outcome as measured by HHS. Elderly patients, particularly those over 70 years of age, appear to benefit from SuperPATH HA. Based on these findings, and taking into account our limitations, we recommend that the use of minimally invasive SuperPATH HA in elderly patients should be more widely considered and not limited to elective THA patients.

Biomechanical Research of Three Parallel Cannulated Compression Screws in Oblique Triangle Configuration for Fixation of Femoral Neck Unstable Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment with internal fixation, specifically percutaneous fixation with three cannulated compression screws (CCSs), is the preferred choice for young and middle-aged patients. The mechanical advantage of the optimal spatial configuration with three screws provides maximum dispersion and cortical support. We suspect that the spatial proportion of the oblique triangle configuration (OTC) in the cross-section of the femoral neck isthmus (FNI) may significantly improve shear and fatigue resistance of the fixed structure, thereby stabilizing the internal fixation system in femoral neck fracture (FNF). This study aims to explore the mechanical features of OTC and provide a mechanical basis for its clinical application.

METHODS

Twenty Sawbone femurs were prepared as Pauwels type III FNF models and divided equally into two fixation groups: OTC and inverted equilateral triangle configuration (IETC). Three 7.3 mm diameter cannulated compression screws (CCSs) were used for fixation. The specimens of FNF after screw internal fixation were subjected to static loading and cyclic loading tests, respectively, with five specimens for each test. Axial stiffness, 5 mm failure load, ultimate load, shear displacement, and frontal rotational angle of two fragments were evaluated. In the cyclic loading test, the load sizes were 700 N, 1400 N, and 2100 N, respectively, and the fracture end displacement was recorded. Results were presented as means ± SD. Data with normal distributions were compared by the Student's t test.

RESULTS

In the static loading test, the axial stiffness, ultimate load, shear displacement, and frontal rotational angle of two fragments were (738.64 vs. 620.74) N/mm, (2957.61 vs. 2643.06) N, (4.67 vs. 5.39) mm, and (4.01 vs. 5.52)° (p < 0.05), respectively. Comparison between the femoral head displacement after 10,000 cycles of 700N cyclic loading and total displacement after 20,000 cycles of 700-1400N cyclic loading showed the OTC group was less than the IETC group (p < 0.05). A comparison of femoral head displacement after 10,000 cycles of 1400N and 2100N cycles and total displacement after 30,000 cycles of 700-2100N cycles showed the OTC group was less than another group, but the difference was not significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

When three CCSs are inserted in parallel to fix FNF, the OTC of three screws has obvious biomechanical advantages, especially in shear resistance and early postoperative weight-bearing, which provides a mechanical basis for clinical selection of ideal spatial configuration for unstable FNF.

Femoral neck shortening as a sequela of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures and its effect on the coronal alignment of the limb: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Femoral neck shortening is a common phenomenon following osteosynthesis for femoral neck fractures, which was shown to have a negative effect on hip function. There is paucity of literature on the effect of shortening on the ipsilateral limb mechanical axis and knee coronal alignment. We hypothesized that postoperative femoral neck shortening can alter the limb's mechanical axis into valgus.

METHODS

Of 583 patients screened, 13 patients with severe neck shortening (< 10 mm) following femoral neck fracture fixation, were found eligible and agreed to participate. A full-length lower limb radiographs were obtained and radiographic parameters (offset, neck-shaft angle, HKA, mLPFA, mDLFA, mMPTFA, MAD, MAD-r) as well as functional scores were obtained.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences in mechanical axis deviation ratio (MAD-r) were found between the ipsilateral and the contralateral extremities (0.41 ± 0.16 versus 0.55 ± 0.11, p = 0.03). A correlation between femoral neck length differences and MAD was not statistically significant although a tendency towards lateral deviation of the mechanical axis was noted (r = - 0.5, p = 0.077). A negative correlation was found between a greater difference in the femoral neck length and the SF12 score, both in the physical and the mental parts (r = - 0.69, p = 0.008; r = - 0.58, p = 0.035, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We found a more lateralized mechanical axis in limbs that demonstrated post-operative ipsilateral femoral neck severe shortening. These findings may provide a possible explanation and rationale for knee pain and perhaps for the development of knee osteoarthritis as a sequalae of femoral neck shortening. Further investigation and larger cohort, long-term studies are needed to further explore this hypothesis.

Management of Garden-I and II Femoral Neck Fractures: Perspectives on Primary Arthroplasty

This review compares internal fixation versus arthroplasty in the treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) calling attention to evolving areas of consensus that influence clinical decision-making. The Garden classification system, typically dichotomized into nondisplaced (types I and II) and displaced (types III and IV) fractures, has been used as a guide for surgical decision-making. Conventionally, treatment of nondisplaced FNF in the elderly has been with internal fixation, and treatment of a displaced FNF has been hemi-, or more recently total hip, arthroplasty. Studies over the last decade have raised concern over the appropriate treatment of nondisplaced FNFs due to high rates of reoperation of nondisplaced FNFs treated with internal fixation. Avascular necrosis (AVN), failure of internal fixation, secondary malunion, and pin/nail penetration through the femoral head have all been observed. Several studies have attributed fixation failure to a degree of femoral neck tilt ≥20°, either posteriorly or anteriorly as seen on the lateral X-ray. Because of these observations of fixation failures, the suggestion has been made that arthroplasty be used when the degree of posterior tilt exceeds a threshold of ≥20° tilt with the expectation of diminishing failure of fixation, decreasing the risk of reoperation and preserving function without increasing mortality rate. Frustrating additional analyses are uncertainties over the mechanisms of failure of internal fixation with ≥20° tilt and the persistently substantial 1-year mortality rate after FNF, which has not been influenced by fixation or replacement type. Due to the lack of consensus regarding the determination of the appropriate surgical intervention for nondisplaced FNFs, an improved algorithm for surgical decision-making for these fractures may prove useful.

[Translated article] The configuration of the screws in the osteosynthesis of fractures of the femoral neck does not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Synthesis with cannulated screws is one of the accepted methods in femoral neck fractures, although its optimal configuration is a subject in continuous debate. The main objective was to compare the results of the patient with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three screws in triangle and inverted triangle configuration in the frontal plane.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective and comparative study of 53 patients with femoral neck fracture, operated between 2015 and 2022 with fixation with three cannulated screws, 22 with a triangle configuration (triangle group) and 31 in an inverted triangle (inverted triangle group). Functionality was evaluated using the modified Merlé d'Aubigné scale, walking ability using the Koval scale, as well as postoperative complications.

RESULTS

On the Merlé d'Aubigné scale, the mean score was 16.7 in the triangle group and 16.1 in the inverted triangle group (p=.259). On the Koval scale, a significant decrease was observed, going from 1.6 preoperative mean to 2.2 after surgery (p=.000), finding no differences between groups. There were six postoperative complications in the triangle group and three in the inverted triangle group (p=.140).

CONCLUSION

The configuration of the screws in the femoral neck, both in the form of a triangle and an inverted triangle, did not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes of the patients with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three cannulated screws.

The configuration of the screws in the osteosynthesis of fractures of the femoral neck does not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Synthesis with cannulated screws is one of the accepted methods in femoral neck fractures, although its optimal configuration is a subject in continuous debate. The main objective was to compare the results of the patient with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three screws in triangle and inverted triangle configuration in the frontal plane.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective and comparative study of 53 patients with femoral neck fracture, operated between 2015 and 2022 with fixation with three cannulated screws, 22 with a triangle configuration (triangle group) and 31 in an inverted triangle (inverted triangle group). Functionality was evaluated using the modified Merlé d'Aubigné scale, walking ability using the Koval scale, as well as postoperative complications.

RESULTS

On the Merlé d'Aubigné scale, the mean score was 16.7 in the triangle group and 16.1 in the inverted triangle group (P=.259). On the Koval scale, a significant decrease was observed, going from 1.6 preoperative mean to 2.2 after surgery (P=.000), finding no differences between groups. There were six postoperative complications in the triangle group and three in the inverted triangle group (P=.140).

CONCLUSION

The configuration of the screws in the femoral neck, both in the form of a triangle and an inverted triangle, did not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes of the patients with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three cannulated screws.

What is the Fate of Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures Treated With Cannulated Screws?

BACKGROUND

We aimed to report implant survival in Garden type I and II femoral neck fractures treated with cannulated screws in elderly patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 232 consecutive unilateral Garden I and II patients (232 fractures) treated with cannulated screws. Mean age was 81 years (range, 65 to 100), and a body mass index of 25 (range, 15.8 to 38.3). No between-group differences were found in demographic variables and/or baseline measurements (P > .05). Mean follow-up was 36 months (range, 1 to 171). Two observers measured baseline radiographic variables with good-to-excellent interobserver reliability. The posterior tilt angle, measured on a cross-table lateral x-ray, was used to classify the cohort into <20° (n = 183) and ≥20° (n = 49). The cumulative incidence with competing risk analysis was used to predict association between posterior tilt and subsequent conversion to arthroplasty. Patient survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier estimate.

RESULTS

Implant survival was 86.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 80 to 90) at 12 months and 77.3% (95% CI 64 to 86) at 70 months. The 12-month cumulative incidence failure was 12.6% (95% CI 8 to 17). After controlling for confounders, posterior tilt ≥20° had higher risk of subsequent arthroplasty when compared to posterior tilt <20° (38.8 [95% CI 25 to 52] versus 5% [95% CI 2.8 to 9], subhazard ratio 8.3, 95% CI 3.8 to 18), without any other radiologic or demographic factor being associated with failure. Patient survival was 88.2% (95% CI 83 to 91.7) at 12 months, 79.5% (95% CI 73 to 84) at 24 months, and 57% (95% CI 48 to 65) at 70 months.

CONCLUSION

Cannulated screws were a reliable treatment for Garden I and II fractures, except when there was posterior tilt ≥20°, where arthroplasty should be considered.

Preoperative posterior tilt can be a risk factor of fixation failure in nondisplaced femoral neck fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify whether posterior tilt increases the risk of treatment failure in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

We searched the databases of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1980 to 2022. The search strategy was based on the combination of keywords "nondisplaced," "hip fracture," "femoral neck fracture," and "internal fixation." Cohort studies enrolled patients with nondisplaced (Garden I and Garden II) femoral neck fractures were included. Two investigators independently extracted data and the other two assessed the methodological quality. Data were analyzed using Review Manager software.

RESULTS

We analyzed 13 cohort trials with a pooled sample of 4818 patients, with posterior tilt ≥ 20° in 698 patients and < 20° in 3578 patients in 11 trials, and posterior tilt ≥ 10° in 483 patients and < 10° in 496 patients in 4 trials. All studies were of high quality based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale evaluation. Treatment failure was reported in 24.4% (170/698) of patients with posterior tilt ≥ 20° and 10.9% (392/3578) of patients with posterior tilt < 20°, indicating that posterior tilt ≥ 20° was significantly associated with a higher risk of treatment failure (Risk ratio, 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77-4.21). Posterior tilt ≥ 10° was not found to be a risk factor for fixation failure (risk ratio, 1.92; 95% CI 0.76-4.83).

CONCLUSION

Nondisplaced femoral neck fractures with posterior tilt ≥ 20° were associated with an increasing rate of failure when treated with internal fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE : III, Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Simple Minimally Invasive Method to Reduce Valgus-Impacted and Tilted Femoral Neck Fractures without Soft Tissue or Cartilage Injury: Radiological and Clinical Results

OBJECTIVE

This is a rare study comparing the radiological and functional outcomes of fixation after reduction with in situ fixation group using Femoral Neck System (FNS). The aim of this study was to introduce a simple, innovative, minimally invasive method to reduce valgus-impacted and tilted femoral neck fractures without soft tissue or cartilage injury.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative analysis of 46 patients between May 2020 and February 2022 was performed. In the control group, 23 patients underwent in situ fixation without reduction. In the study group, another 23 patients were managed by fixation after reduction using a percutaneous pull-out technique with a full threaded Steinmann pin. Caput-collum-diaphysis (CCD) angle, tilt, and femoral neck shortenings were compared between the two groups. In addition, Harris Hip Score (HHS) was evaluated and compared at 1 year after surgery. Basically, independent samples t-test was used to compare radiological and functional results.

RESULTS

Patients' initial valgus and tilt angles were not significantly different between the groups (n.s.). However, the CCD and tilt angles measured immediately and at one year postoperatively were significantly different between the groups (p < 0.05). Regarding femoral neck shortening, shortening in the three directions, the x, y, and z vectors, was significantly less in the reduction group immediately postoperatively and at 1 year post-surgery (p < 0.05). The mean HHS at 1 year postoperatively was 79.7 ± 8.4 in the in situ fixation group and 87.9 ± 6.6 in the reduction groups, and there was a significant difference (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The pull-out method with a threaded Steinmann pin to reduce valgus-impacted and tilted femoral neck fracture is safe and effective for accomplishing anatomical restoration. This may achieve successful bone union and maintain the femoral neck length and original tilt without nearby soft tissue or cartilage injury.

Bone Grafting Can Promote the Prognosis of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: A Follow-up of the Clinical Significance of Bone Defects

Background

Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) comprise a large proportion of osteoporotic fractures in Asia. However, the full range of prognostic variables that affect prognosis remains unclear. Here, we aimed to determine whether the severity of bone defects at the fracture site and other variables impact the prognosis of displaced FNFs.

Methods

We evaluated the incidence of FNF internal fixation failures at regular intervals after surgery in data collected retrospectively. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) magnetic resonance imaging data of the displaced FNFs of 204 patients (> 20 years old; mean age, 52.3 years; men, 55.4%) who underwent internal fixation were used to construct three-dimensional (3D) virtual models of the femoral neck region. We calculated the position and volume of bone defect (VBD) using our independently developed algorithm and Mimics software. Each participant was followed up for at least 24 months; complications were noted and correlated with VBD and demographic and clinical variables.

Results

On the basis of VBD values calculated from virtual reduction models, 57 patients were categorized as having a mild defect, 100 as having a moderate defect, and 47 as having a severe defect. Age (p = 0.046) and VBD (p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with internal fixation failure. Multivariate analysis revealed that severe bone defects were associated with internal fixation failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 23.073; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.791-190.732) and complications (aOR, 8.945; 95% CI, 1.829-43.749). In patients with a severe defect, bone grafting was inversely associated with internal fixation failure (aOR, 0.022; 95% CI, 0.002-0.268) and complications (aOR, 0.023; 95% CI, 0.002-0.299).

Conclusions

Bone defect severity was associated with internal fixation failure and other complications. For young adults with large VBDs, bone grafting of the defect can reduce the risk of internal fixation failure. These results provide useful new quantitative information for precisely classifying displaced FNFs and guiding subsequent optimal treatments.

Internal Fixation Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare internal fixation (IF) versus hemiarthroplasty (HA) for elderly individuals (ie, older than 65 years) with nondisplaced (ie, Garden type I or II) femoral neck fracture (FNF).

DATA SOURCE

We searched English literature of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase from inception to December 4, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared IF versus HA for elderly individuals with nondisplaced FNF. Primary outcomes were Harris hip score (HHS), quality of life per European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D), and mortality. Secondary outcomes were complications, reoperation, intraoperative bleeding, operation duration, and length of hospital stay.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors separately extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Three RCTs yielding 400 patients were enrolled, of which 203 (50.7%) underwent IF. Internal fixation was inferior to HA with respect to 6-month HHS [mean difference (MD) = -8.28 (-14.46, -2.10), P = 0.009] and 1-year EQ-5D [MD = -0.07 (-0.14, -0.00), P = 0.04]. The 2 techniques were comparable regarding length of hospital stay (day), HHS at 1 and 2 years, EQ-5D at 2 years, and mortality. IF was inferior to HA in implant-related complication [20.1% vs. 6.0%, relative risk (RR) = 3.18 (1.72, 5.88), P = 0.0002] and reoperation rate [20.1% vs. 6.0%, RR = 3.30 (1.79, 6.08), P = 0.0001]. Hemiarthroplasty had a greater blood loss (mL) [MD = -138.88 (-209.58, -68.18), P = 0.001] and operation duration (min) [MD = -23.27 (-44.95, -1.60), P = 0.04] compared with IF.

CONCLUSION

HA is the preferred technique for nondisplaced FNF if early recovery, higher mobility, and better quality of life are priorities. The choice of fixation should be weighed on an individual patient level.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Conversion to Arthroplasty After Internal Fixation of Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures: Results from a Swedish Register Cohort of 5,428 Individuals 60 Years of Age or Older

BACKGROUND

Although most nondisplaced or minimally displaced femoral neck fractures are routinely treated with internal fixation, high rates of secondary surgical procedures are common, especially in the elderly population. Primary arthroplasty in elderly patients has been proposed as an alternative treatment to reduce the need for a secondary surgical procedure. The objective of this study was to describe the rate of conversion to arthroplasty within 5 years after internal fixation of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in patients ≥60 years of age.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study of prospectively collected data from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) between 2012 and 2018, cross-matched with the Swedish Arthroplasty Register (SAR), 5,428 nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in patients ≥60 years of age were included. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate conversion rates to arthroplasty and mortality in various age groups at 1, 2, and 5 years.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence function (CIF) for conversion to arthroplasty was 6.3% at 1 year, 8.1% at 2 years, and 10.1% at 5 years. The conversion rates within 2 years were 6.5% in 60 to 69-year-olds, 9.6% in 70 to 79-year-olds, and 7.8% in ≥80-year-olds. Women had a higher risk of conversion; the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 1.87). The cumulative mortality was 21.3% (95% CI, 20.3% to 22.5%) at 1 year, 31.3% (95% CI, 30.0% to 32.6%) at 2 years, and 54.9% (95% CI, 53.1% to 56.7%) at 5 years. Mortality was higher in men at all time points, and the adjusted 1-year HR was 1.79 (95% CI, 1.61 to 2.00).

CONCLUSIONS

One in 10 patients ≥60 years of age treated with internal fixation for a nondisplaced femoral neck fracture underwent conversion to arthroplasty within 5 years, and more than one-half of the conversions occurred within the first year. The risk of conversion was highest in women and in patients 70 to 79 years of age. These data warrant further studies in this frail patient group to identify subgroups of patients who would benefit from primary arthroplasty for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fraturas intracapsulares do colo femoral no idoso

Currently, intracapsular femoral neck fracture (IFNF) is still a great challenge for orthopedists. In spite of the progress that has been made, a high mortality rate persists in the first year, especially in Brazil, where there is no awareness that such fractures in elderly patients should be treated as a medical emergency. The present article seeks to provide an update on the preoperative, surgical, and postoperative approaches.

Neck of femur fractures treated with the femoral neck system: outcomes of one hundred and two patients and literature review

Introduction

The recently developed femoral neck system (FNS) for treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNF), comprises theoretical biomechanical advantages compared to other implants. The aim of this study was to validate the safety and to report outcomes of patients treated with the FNS.

Method

A retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated by FNS with a minimum of three months of follow-up. Details analysed from three medical centres were operative duration, estimated blood loss, initial hospitalisation duration, fixation quality as well as complications and reoperation rate. Patients who had revision surgery were compared to all other patients to identify risk factors for failure. In addition, a literature review was performed to analyse data on FNS clinical implementation and patient’s outcomes. The two data sets were combined and analysed.

Results

One-hundred and two patients were included in this study cohort with an average follow-up of seven months (range 3–27). Ten papers were included in the literature review, reporting data on 278 patients. Overall, 380 patients were analysed. Average age was 62.6 years, 52% of the fractures were classified as Gardens 1–2. Overall, the revision rate was 9.2% (14 patients diagnosed with cut-out of implant, 10 with AVN, 8 with non-union and 8 with hardware removal). For the 102 patients in the cohort risk factors for reoperation included patients age, surgeon seniority and inadequate placement of the implant.

Conclusion

This study shows that FNS is a safe treatment option for FNF. Intra-operative parameters and failure rates are comparable to previously reported rates for this implant and other frequently used implants.

Patients With Un-Displaced Or Displaced Intra Capsular Proximal Femur Fractures Do Not Represent A Different Patient Group And Have Similar Short And Long Term Mortality

BACKGROUND

Proximal femur fractures in geriatric patients are associated with substantial mortality. Management of intracapsular proximal femur fractures has been based on age, displacement, cognition, and pre-injury mobility. However, over the last decade, there has been a tendency to offer arthroplasty rather than internal fixation for these patients irrespective of displacement, to allow early mobilisation and negate the higher rate of reoperation due to failed internal fixation. There are no previous investigations analysing whether the severity of fracture displacement is related to different patient characteristics.

AIM

This study examines whether patients sustaining undisplaced or displaced intracapsular proximal femur fractures represent different patient groups with different pre-injury characteristics and post-operative mortality, irrespective of treatment modality.

METHODS

A retrospective series of 329 consecutive patients over the age of 55 years who sustained intracapsular proximal femur fractures, who underwent surgical management at a district general hospital over a period of 2 years (2012-2013) were identified using the national hip fracture database. Demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) grade, pre-injury outdoor mobility status, cognitive status, and admission serum investigations, fracture displacement, type of surgery, and mortality rates at short term (2 years) & long-term (7-9 years) were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 109 male and 220 female patients with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. The mean age at surgery was 81.6 years (range 55-103 years). There were 63 (19.1%) undisplaced fractures (Garden 1 &2) and, 265 (80.5%) displaced fractures (Garden 3 & 4). The median survival in this cohort was 2.95 years (95% CI 2.3-3.6). Mortality rates were 77.4% (n=257) at long-term (7-9 years) follow-up. Admission patient characteristics showed no statistically significant difference between displaced and undisplaced fracture groups. This included ASA, pre-operative cognition, and mobility status. Fracture displacement was not an independent predictor of mortality at short or long term.

CONCLUSION

In patients sustaining intracapsular proximal femur fractures, the degree of displacement is not a caveat for a different patient group. Fracture displacement is not predicted by the pre-injury level of function and does not predict short or long-term mortality.

Clinical outcomes of patients with Garden I and II femoral neck fractures as verified on MRI: a retrospective case series

Background

Between 2 to 10% of non-displaced femoral neck fractures (nFNF) cannot be diagnosed on plain radiographs and require further imaging investigation to be detected or verified. These fractures are referred to as occult hip fractures. This study aimed to report treatment failures, reoperations and mortality in a consecutive series of occult femoral neck fractures (FNF) treated with internal fixation (IF).

Methods

A retrospective multicenter study was performed based on a consecutive series of patients aged ≥ 60 years with an occult magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) verified Garden I and II FNF sustained after a trauma and treated with primary IF. We included 93 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic assessment encompassed pre- and postoperative tilt, implant inclination, MRI and treatment failure. Data on reoperation and mortality were collected. Treatment failure was defined as fixation failure, nonunion, avascular necrosis or posttraumatic osteoarthritis.

Results

The study comprised of 93 patients (72% women, 67/93) with a mean age of 82 (range, 60–97) years. Overall, 6 (6%) patients had major reoperations. 2 (2%) had minor reoperations. One-month mortality was 7%, 1-year mortality was 20% and 2-year mortality was 31%.

Conclusion

This multicenter cohort study identifies a subgroup of elderly patients with MRI verified Garden I and II FNFs sustained after trauma, i.e. occult fractures. These fractures seem to have a lower complication rate compared to nFNF identified on plain radiographs.

Level of evidence

Prognostic Level V. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of oblique triangular configuration and inverted equilateral triangular configuration of three cannulated screws in treating unstable femoral neck fracture: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The cross-sectional area of three parallel screws might affect the stability of the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. The screws fixed in the oblique-triangle configuration (OTC) were assumed to have a larger cross-sectional area, but the biomechanical stability has not yet been validated. In this study, finite element analyses were performed to compare the biomechanical properties of the internal fixation fixed by the OTC and the traditional Inverted Equilateral Triangle Configuration (IETC).

METHOD

Pauwels type III fracture was established on the three-dimensional femoral model and three cannulated screws with the OTC and traditional IETC methods were applied. The oblique-triangle configuration with the largest area inscribed the femoral neck isthmus by the three screws was determined, the area and circumference of the cross-section formed by the OTC and IETC model were compared. Stress, strain, and displacement peaks of the two configuration models under different loads were compared. Twelve pairs of nodes on the fracture ends were selected and the displacement of the fracture ends was evaluated through the displacement between these nodes.

RESULTS

The area and circumference of the cross-section formed by the OTC were larger than those in the IETC model. The degree of stress dispersion around the screw holes in the OTC model was better than that of the IETC, but the stress distribution order of the three screws in the two models was consistent. The maximum stress, strain, displacement, and displacement of the fracture end in the OTC model were smaller than those in the IETC model. The stress, strain, displacement, and fracture end displacement peaks of the two fixed models gradually increase with the increase of loads.

CONCLUSION

The oblique-triangle configuration showed superior mechanical properties than the IETC in finite element analyses. This study suggests that when three screws are fixed in parallel method, the larger the cross-sectional area of the screw configuration, the better stability of the internal fixation might be obtained. Furthermore, the biomechanical properties of various spatial configurations and screw holes of the three parallel screws need to be considered before clinical practice.

The oblique triangle configuration of three parallel screws for femoral neck fracture fixation using computer-aided design modules

Closed reduction and internal fixation with three cannulated compression screws is a common method for treating femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Protocols including the inverted triangle configuration and dispersion of the screws still needed further supports. The purpose of this study was to explore a novel oblique triangle configuration (OTC) of three screws in fixing femoral neck fractures based on the morphology of the femoral neck isthmus (FNI). The computer-aided design modules were used to explore the ideal spatial configuration with largest triangle by three parallel screws. A univariate evaluation model was established based on the oval-like cross-section of the FNI. When the three screws were positioned by the OTC, Inverted Equilateral Triangle Configuration (IETC), and the Maximum Area Inverted Isosceles Triangle Configuration (MA-IITC) respectively, the proportion of area and circumference in the cross-section of FNI and the changing trend of proportion were compared under various torsion angles, eccentricity, and cross-sectional area of FNI. The area and circumference ratios of the parallel screws using the OTC method were significantly higher than in the IETC and MA-IITC groups. In the univariate evaluation model, the OTC area ratio and circumference ratio remained stable under the different femoral neck torsion angles, FNI cross-sectional area, and eccentricity. The OTC method provided an ideal spatial configuration for the FNA fixation with the largest area using three parallel screws. The position of the posterior screw was also away from the metaphyseal artery, potentially reducing the possibility of vascular injury and screw penetrating.

Preoperative Anterior and Posterior Tilt of Garden I-II Femoral Neck Fractures Predict Treatment Failure and Need for Reoperation in Patients Over 60 Years

The purpose of the present study was to estimate the effect of preoperative fracture tilt and to scrutinize the effect of anterior tilt on the risk of treatment failure in patients with Garden Type-I and II femoral neck fractures that are treated with internal fixation.

Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry

Purpose

To determine whether internal fixation (IF) or hip arthroplasty (HA) is associated with superior outcomes in geriatric nondisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients.

Methods

Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (ATR-DGU) were analyzed (IF Group 449 and HA Group 1278 patients). In-hospital care and a 120-day postoperative follow-up were conducted. Primary outcomes, including mobility, residential status, reoperation rate, and a generic health status measure (EQ-5D score), and the secondary outcome of mortality were compared between groups. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess independent treatment group associations (odds ratios, ORs) with the primary and secondary end points.

Results

Patients in the HA group were older (83 vs. 81 years, p < 0.001) and scored higher on the Identification of Seniors at Risk screening (3 vs. 2, p < 0.001). We observed no differences in residential status, reoperation rate, EQ-5D score, or mortality between groups. After adjusting for key covariates, including prefracture ambulatory capacity, the mobility of patients in the HA group was more frequently impaired at the 120-day follow-up (OR 2.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.11–4.74).

Conclusion

Treatment with HA compared to treatment with IF led to a more than twofold increase in the adjusted odds of impaired ambulation at the short-term follow-up, while no significant associations with residential status, reoperation rate, EQ-5D index score, or mortality were observed. Thus, IF for geriatric nondisplaced FNFs was associated with superior mobility 120 days after surgery. However, before definitive treatment recommendations can be made, prospective, randomized, long-term studies must be performed to confirm our findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1.

Epidemiology, classification, treatment, and mortality of adult femoral neck and basicervical fractures: an observational study of 40,049 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register

BACKGROUND

Although femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are common in orthopedic departments, optimal treatment methods remain in dispute. There are few large nationwide studies, including basicervical FNFs (bFNFs), on epidemiology, treatment, and mortality. This nationwide study aims to describe the epidemiology, fracture classification, current treatment regimens, and mortality of undisplaced and minimally displaced (Garden I-II, uFNF), displaced (Garden III-IV, dFNF) and bFNFs in adults.

METHODS

All FNFs, including bFNFs with a registered injury date between 1 April 2012 and 31 December 2020, were included in this observational study from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR). Data on age, sex, injury mechanism, fracture classification, primary treatment, and seasonal variation were analyzed.

RESULTS

Some 40,049 FNFs were registered in the SFR. The mean age of the patients in the register was 80.3 (SD 11) years and 63.8% (25,567) were female. Of all FNFs, 25.0% (10,033) were uFNFs, 63.4% (25,383) dFNFs, and 11.6% (4,633) bFNFs. Non-surgical treatment was performed in 0.6% (261) of the patients. Internal fixation (IF) (84.7%) was the main treatment for uFNFs and arthroplasty (87.3%) for dFNFs. For bFNFs, IF (43.8%) and hip arthroplasty (45.9%) were performed equally often. Of the 33,105 patients with a 1-year follow-up mortality at 1-year was 20.6% for uFNF, 24.3% for dFNF, and 25.4% for bFNF.

CONCLUSION

The main treatment of uFNFs is IF with screws or pins. Hip arthroplasty is the predominant treatment for dFNF. bFNF are more common than previously reported and treated with IF or arthroplasty, depending on patient age. These results may help health care providers, researchers and clinicians better understand the panorama of FNFs in Sweden.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective cohort study.

Nomogram for predicting reoperation following internal fixation of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate risk factors and develop a nomogram for reoperation after internal fixation of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in elderly patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study involving a total of 255 elderly patients who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screw system for nondisplaced FNFs between January 2016 and January 2019. We collected data on demographics, preoperative radiological parameters, surgery, serum biochemical markers, and postoperative rehabilitation. In addition, we performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine independent risk factors for reoperation, and then developed a nomogram to assess the risks of reoperation. Besides, discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the nomogram were evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA), respectively. We employed bootstrap method to validate the performance of the developed nomogram.

RESULTS

Our analysis showed that among the 255 patients, 28 (11.0%) underwent reoperation due to osteonecrosis of the femoral head (14 cases), mechanical failure (8 cases) or nonunion (6 cases). All of the 28 patients underwent conversion surgery to arthroplasty. The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that preoperative posterior tilt angle ≥ 20°, Pauwel's III type, younger patients, preoperative elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), preoperative hypoalbuminemia, and early postoperative weight-bearing were independent risk factors for reoperation. In addition, the C-index and the bootstrap value of the developed nomogram was 0.850 (95% CI = 0.803-0.913) and 0.811, respectively. Besides, the calibration curve showed good consistency between the actual diagnosed reoperation and the predicted probability, while the DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically valuable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis showed we successfully developed and validated a nomogram for personalized prediction of reoperation after internal fixation of nondisplaced FNFs in elderly patients. This model would help in individualized evaluation of the need for reoperation and inform strategies aimed at eliminating the need for the reoperation.

Direct anterior approach (DAA) vs. conventional approaches in total hip arthroplasty: A RCT meta-analysis with an overview of related meta-analyses

OBJECTIVES

Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses on short-term outcomes between total hip arthroplasty (THA) through direct anterior approach (DAA) compared to THA through conventional (including anterior, anterolateral, lateral transgluteal, lateral transtrochanteric, posterior, and posterolateral) approaches (CAs) in treatment of hip diseases and fractures showed contradicting conclusions. Our aim was to draw definitive conclusions by conducting both a fixed and random model meta-analysis of quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and by comparison with related meta-analyses.

DESIGN

We performed a systematic literature search up to May 2020 to identify RCTs, comparing THA through DAA with THA through CAs and related meta-analyses. We conducted risk of bias and level of evidence assessment in accordance with the Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool and with the guidelines of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. We estimated mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) through fixed and random effects models, using the DerSimonian and Laird method. Heterogeneity was assessed using tau-square (τ2). Our conclusions take into account the overall results from related meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Nine studies on THA through DAA met the criteria for final meta-analysis, involving 998 patients. Three studies were blinded RCTs with a level I evidence, the other 6 studies were non-blinded RCTs with a level II evidence. We came to the following results for THA through DAA compared to THA through CAs: operation time (I2 = 92%, p<0.01; fixed: MD = 15.1, 95% CI 13.1 to 17.1; random: MD = 18.1, 95% CI 8.6 to 27.5); incision length (I2 = 100%, p<0.01; fixed: MD = -2.9, 95% CI -3.0 to -2.8; MD = -1.1, 95% CI -4.3 to 2.0); intraoperative blood loss (I2 = 87%, p<0.01; fixed: MD = 51.5, 95% CI 34.1 to 68.8; random: MD = 51.9, 95% CI -89.8 to 193.5); VAS 1 day postoperatively (I2 = 79%, p = 0.03; fixed: MD = -0.8, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.4; random: MD = -0.9, 95% CI -2.0 to 0.15); HHS 3 months postoperatively (I2 = 52%, p = 0.08; fixed: MD = 2.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.6; random: MD = 3.0, 95% CI -0.5 to 6.5); HHS 6 months postoperatively (I2 = 0%, p = 0.67; fixed: MD = 0.9, 95% CI -1.1 to 2.9; random: MD = 0.9, 95% CI -1.1 to 2.9); HHS 12 months postoperatively (I2 = 0%, p = 0.79; fixed: MD = 0.7, 95% CI -0.9 to 2.4; random: MD = 0.7, 95% CI -0.9 to 2.4). We compared our findings with 7 related meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the results of our meta-analysis and the review of related meta-analyses, we can conclude that short-term outcomes of THA through DAA were overall better than THA through CAs. THA through DAA had a shorter incision length, a tendency towards a lower pain VAS 1 day postoperatively and better early postoperative functional outcome than THA through CAs. The intraoperative blood loss showed indifferent results. THA through DAA had a longer operation time than THA through CAs.

The Effect on the Fracture Healing following Femoral Neck Shortening after Osteoporotic Femoral Neck Fracture Treated with Internal Fixation: Finite Element Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the stress status of fracture site caused by femoral neck shortening and to analyze the stress of fracture site and the implants from the finite element point of view.

Methods

CT scan data of hip of a normal adult female were collected. Three-dimensional reconstruction MICs and related module function simulation was used to establish the postoperative shortening model of femoral neck fracture with Pauwels angle > 50°, which was treated with cannulated screws. The models were divided into four groups: normal femoral neck, shortening in 2.5 mm, shortening in 7.5 mm, and shortening in 12.5 mm. The finite element analysis software msc.nastran2012 was used, and the data of maximum stress and stress nephogram of fracture site and implants were carried out.

Results

From normal femoral neck to shortening in 12.5 mm of the femoral neck, the maximum tensile stress increased gradually in the fracture site above the cannulated screws while compressive stress decreased gradually in the fracture site below the cannulated screws, and the maximum stress of the cannulated screws increased gradually with obvious stress concentration at the screw holes in the fracture site, and the peak value of stress concentration was about 179 MPa.

Conclusion

The biomechanical environment of the fracture site changed by femoral neck shortening. With the increasing of femoral neck shortening, the stress of the fracture site and implants would be uneven; then, the stability of fracture site would become worse, and the possibility of implant sliding or even breakage would be increased.

Treatment of Valgus-Impacted and Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fragility Fractures in the Elderly

As the life expectancy of the worldwide population increases, the number of hip fractures in the elderly cohort is expected to grow. It is important for surgeons to critically analyze available treatment options for these injuries, with the goal of optimizing outcomes and minimizing complications. Femoral neck fractures make up approximately half of all hip fractures. Nonoperative treatment of valgus-impacted and nondisplaced (Garden I and II) femoral neck fractures has high rates of secondary displacement, osteonecrosis, and nonunion; only patients with notable risk for perioperative complications are treated nonoperatively. Surgical intervention is the standard of care, with options including internal fixation (IF) with multiple cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw, hemiarthroplasty, or total hip arthroplasty. Patients with a posterior tilt of greater than 20° have a high rate of revision surgery when treated with IF and may benefit from primary arthroplasty. Furthermore, primary arthroplasty has demonstrated lower revision surgery rates and equivalent postoperative mortality when compared with IF. Surgeons should be aware of the functional outcomes, complications, revision surgery rates, and mortality rates associated with each treatment modality to make a patient-specific decision regarding their care.

Augmenting a dynamic hip screw with a calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite biomaterial

Internal fixation failure in hip fractures can lead to reoperation. Calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite (CaS/HA) is a biomaterial that can be used for augmenting fracture fixation. We aimed to determine whether an injection of 2 ml CaS/HA increases the fixation of a dynamic hip screw inserted in synthetic and human trabecular bone. The study consists of two parts: 1) synthetic bone blocks (n = 74), with three subgroups: empty (cannulated screw, no injection), cannulated, and fenestrated; and 2) osteoporotic human femoral heads (n = 29), with the same subgroups. The heads were imaged using µCT. Bone volume fraction, insertion angle, and head diameter were measured. Pullout tests were performed and peak force, stiffness, and work were measured. The fenestrated group showed increases in pullout strength compared to no injection in the synthetic blocks. The cannulated group showed a higher pullout strength in low-density blocks. In the femoral heads, the variation was larger and there were no significant differences between groups. The bone volume fraction correlated with the peak force and work, and the insertion angle correlated with the stiffness. CaS/HA can improve the fixation of a dynamic hip screw. For clinical use, spreading of the material around the threads of the screw must be ensured.

A Postoperative Displacement Measurement Method for Femoral Neck Fracture Internal Fixation Implants Based on Femoral Segmentation and Multi-Resolution Frame Registration

Femoral neck fractures have a high incidence in the geriatric population and are associated with high mortality and disability rates. With the minimally invasive nature, internal fixation is widely used as a treatment option to stabilize femoral neck fractures. The fixation effectiveness and stability of the implant is an essential guide for the surgeon. However, there is no long-term reliable evaluation method to quantify the implant’s fixation effect without affecting the patient’s behavior and synthesizing long-term treatment data. For the femur’s symmetrical structure, this study used 3D convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation (3D-UNet) to segment the injured femur as a mask, aligned computerized tomography (CT) scans of the patient at different times after surgery and quantified the displacement in the specified direction using the generated 3D point cloud. In the experimental part, we used 10 groups containing two CT images scanned at the one-year interval after surgery. By comparing manual segmentation of femur and segmentation of femur as a mask using neural network, the mask obtained by segmentation using the 3D-UNet network with symmetric structure fully meets the requirements of image registration. The data obtained from the 3D point cloud calculation is within the error tolerance, and the calculated displacement of the implant can be visualized in 3D space.

Are lateral view radiographs necessary to properly classify femoral neck fractures? Intra and interobserver analysis using Garden's classification system

INTRODUCTION

Femoral neck fractures have been historically diagnosed by anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (L) radiographic views. We analyzed the importance of the L view for management of femoral neck fractures, using the Garden's classification system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Slides were elaborated with AP and L radiographic views of 100 patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to our emergency department. Three hip surgeons assessed independently AP views only and then AP and L views together using Garden's classification system.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences (Kruskal Wallis 0, p=1) were found while comparing categories among Garden's classification system, after assessing L views. There was an 81 % (p < 0.001) agreement of Garden category between AP and AP combined with L views. When analyzing patients with changing categories between displaced and non displaced after assessing L view images, we found a 5% (n=5, CI 95% 1-11%) of change. For comparing AP Garden with L view Garden, we used a quadratic weighted kappa method.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high agreement in the Garden category when comparing AP with combined AP and L observations. Five patients would have received a different surgical treatment dependent on the hip surgeon who assessed the radiographs. This highlights the relevance of routinely L radiographs whenever a femoral neck fracture is suspected.

Current Trends in the Evaluation and Management of Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

Nondisplaced (Garden I and II) femoral neck (FN) fractures are commonly encountered by the practicing orthopaedic surgeon. Although these fractures are primarily classified based on the AP radiograph, the lateral radiograph should be closely scrutinized as well because posterior tilt has emerged as a consistent predictor of fixation failure. Internal fixation has for many years been the standard of care, with both cannulated screws and the sliding hip screw representing acceptable options. However, the outcomes after fixation of Garden I and II FN fractures have not been uniformly positive, with the rates of revision surgery ranging from 8% to 27%. Complications after fixation of nondisplaced FN fractures include nonunion, fixation failure, osteonecrosis, and femoral shortening causing inferior hip function. For these reasons, arthroplasty is increasingly considered a viable option in the treatment of these fractures, especially in the presence of factors that predispose to failure after fixation. Novel devices for FN fixation have recently been developed, although clinical data supporting their use are sparse at the present time.

The Oval-like Cross-section of Femoral Neck Isthmus in Three-dimensional Morphological Analysis

Objectives

To investigate the cross‐section shape of the femoral neck isthmus (FNI) in three‐dimensional reconstruction model of the femoral neck.

Methods

From December 2009 to December 2012, computed tomography (CT) data of bilateral hip joint from 200 consecutive patients (137 males and 63 females, 69.41 ± 9.21 years old, ranged from 50–85 years old) who underwent surgical treatments for proximal femoral fracture were retrospectively reviewed. The 3D model of the proximal femur was reconstructed, and the “inertia axis” method, which was applied to measure the long and short axes of the cross‐section of the FNI, was established. The cross‐sectional area and perimeter were calculated by a formula using the length of the long and short axes and then compared with the actual measured values by the software. Correlation between the descriptive parameters of the FNI cross‐section (area, perimeter, and eccentricity) and patients' demographics (age, height, and weight) was analyzed. Stepwise linear regression analysis was used to determine the main relevant factors.

Results

The ICC results showed excellent data reproducibility ranged from 0.989 to 0.996. There was no significant difference in the cross‐sectional area of the FNI between the actual measured values and the predicted values using the formula (732.83 ± 126.74 mm²vs 731.62 ± 128.15 mm², P = 0.322). The perimeter using the two methods showed narrow while significant difference (97.86 ± 8.60 mm vs 92.84 ± 8.65 mm, P < 0.001), the actual measured values were about 5 mm greater than the predicted values. The parameters (area, perimeter, and eccentricity) were significantly larger in male than female (P < 0.001). A positive correlation between the cross‐sectional area, perimeter, height, and weight was observed. The stepwise linear regression analysis showed that the regression equation of the FNI area was as follows: Y = −1083.75 + 1033.86 × HEIGHT + 1.92 × WEIGHT, R² = 0.489.

Conclusion

The cross‐section shape of the FNI appears to be oval‐like in the 3D model, which is separated according to the inertia axis, and the findings proposed an anatomical basis for the further study of the spatial configuration of cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Long-Term Efficacy of Screw Fixation vs Hemiarthroplasty for Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients over 65 Years of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To compare the long‐term efficacy of screw fixation and hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures.

Methods

We searched Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE from inception to 10 June 2020 to identify studies about undisplaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients over 65 years of age. The included studies were assessed by two researchers according to the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias criteria and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Meta‐analysis was performed with Revman 5.3 software. The odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were used to compare dichotomous and continuous variables.

Results

A total of 750 patients were included in this meta‐analysis. In elderly patients, undisplaced femoral neck fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty had a lower implant‐related complication rate (OR, 4.05 [95% CI, 2.38 to 6.89]; P < 0.00001; I² = 0), lower reoperation rate (OR, 4.88 [95% CI, 2.84 to 8.38]; P < 0.00001; I² = 0), and superior Harris score (WMD, −5.05 [95% CI, −7.30 to −2.80]; P < 0.0001; I² = 0) in the early postoperative period. Although screw fixation was associated with shorter operative time (WMD, −36.22 [95% CI, −50.72 to −21.73]; P < 0.00001; I² = 98%) and less blood loss (WMD, −165.84 [95% CI, −209.29 to −122.38]; P < 0.00001; I² = 96%), there was no significant difference in long‐term mortality (OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.28 to 1.48]; P < 0.31; I² = 75%) between these two treatments.

Conclusion

In elderly patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures, hemiarthroplasty provided a lower implant‐related complication rate, lower reoperation rate, superior hip function without increased long‐term mortality. Hemiarthroplasty should be recommended as a better alternative in such patients compared with multiple cannulated screws.

Retrospective cohort trial protocol of screw fixation compared with hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence for the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the hemiarthroplasty versus screw fixation in elderly patients with the displaced femoral neck fractures. Our current investigation aimed at assessing the complications, functional outcome, and revision rate of the patients (over 65 years old) who received internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty via a same senior surgeon.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures from May 2014 to February 2018. The current study was carried out at our hospital and it was approved through our institutional review committee of West China Hospital. Inclusion criteria were as follows: the patients were 65 years or older, this is the anesthesia grade. The higher grade of the patients,the greater risk of surgery. level I-III, and the patients with displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck, with the radiographic and clinical follow-up of 12 months or more. The major outcome was the revision rate between the 2 groups. And the secondary outcomes contained the life quality and functional outcome detected via utilizing the interview-administered and self-administered questionnaires, length of hospital stay, surgery time, and hip-related complications (such as hip dislocation, loosening or breakage of implant, wound problems, infection, osteolysis, neurovascular injury, and bone nonunion).

RESULTS

It was assumed that hemiarthroplasty would result in fewer revisions or complications and better functional scores in comparison with internal fixation technique.

Comparison of short-term outcomes between SuperPATH approach and conventional approaches in hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

It remains uncertain if the new SuperPATH approach benefits patients in artificial hip joint replacement. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the short-term outcome of SuperPATH approach and conventional approaches in hip joint replacement.

Methods

A systematic literature search up to April 2020 was performed to identify randomized controlled trials comparing SuperPATH with conventional approaches in hip joint replacement. We measured surgical, functional, and radiological outcomes. Mean differences or odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled using random effects models and the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method.

Results

A total of 12 RCTs involving 726 patients met the inclusion criteria, one trial with a level I evidence, 11 trials with level II evidence. The overall meta-analysis showed that SuperPATH approach reduced incision length (MD = − 4.84, 95% CI − 7.04 to − 2.64, p < 0.01), pain VAS 7 day postoperatively (MD = − 1.39, 95% CI − 2.57 to − 0.21, p = 0.03), and HHS 7 day postoperatively (MD = 10.24, 95% CI 0.27 to 20.21, p = 0.05). The two approaches did not differ in acetabular cup positioning angles, intra- and postoperative blood loss, hospitalization period, and postoperative complications. Hip replacement via SuperPATH approach had a longer operation time than hip replacement via conventional approaches.

Conclusions

SuperPATH approach showed better results in decreasing incision length and early pain intensity as well as improvement of short-term functional outcome. Long-term outcomes of SuperPATH approach need to be investigated.

A cohort study comparing internal fixation for undisplaced versus hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture in the elderly: a pilot study for a clinical trial

Introduction

The literature regarding undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) is sparse. The aim of this prospective feasibility study is to compare the clinical outcome after undisplaced FNF treated with internal fixation (IF) and displaced FNF treated with hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that hip arthroplasty would give a lower incidence of reoperations.

Methods

A total of 235 patients were included with a median age of 84 years (range 65–99). A consecutive series of 65 patients with undisplaced FNF were treated with IF, and 170 patients with displaced FNF were treated with either a total hip arthroplasty or a hemiarthroplasty. Follow-up interviews were conducted at 1 year using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), WOMAC, and pain numeric rating scale (PNRS). The minimum follow-up time was 22 months. There was no difference in baseline data between the groups.

Results

Nineteen (8%) hips required reoperation at least once at a mean of 6 months (range 0–35). The rate of reoperation was higher in the IF group compared to the hip arthroplasty group (13.8% vs. 5.9%, 95% CI 0.9–6.4). The overall 1-year and 2-year mortality was 28% and 40%, respectively, with no difference between the groups. The most common reasons for reoperations in the IF group were non-union and avascular necrosis, and 6 patients were treated with hip or excision arthroplasty. In the arthroplasty group, the most common indications were deep infection and dislocation. We did not find any differences between the groups in terms of HHS, WOMAC, and PNRS.

Conclusions

In this feasibility study, we found no differences in patient-reported outcomes between the groups although IF required a higher rate of reoperations. Further randomized trials are needed to establish the optimal treatment of undisplaced FNF in the elderly.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.org, NCT03392285. Retrospectively registered on 5 February 2018.

Screw Fixation Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screw fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in low-demand elderly patients.

METHODS

We constructed a Markov decision model using a low-demand, 80-year-old patient as the base case. Costs, health-state utilities, mortality rates, and transition probabilities were obtained from published literature. The simulation model was cycled until all patients were deceased to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio with a willingness-to-pay threshold set at $100,000 per QALY. We performed sensitivity analyses to assess our parameter assumptions.

RESULTS

For the base case, hemiarthroplasty was associated with greater quality of life (2.96 QALYs) compared with screw fixation (2.73 QALYs) with lower cost ($23,467 vs. $25,356). Cost per QALY for hemiarthroplasty was $7925 compared with $9303 in screw fixation. Hemiarthroplasty provided better outcomes at lower cost, indicating dominance over screw fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemiarthroplasty is a cost-effective option compared with screw fixation for the treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in the low-demand elderly. Medical comorbidities and other factors that impact perioperative mortality should also be considered in the treatment decision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hemiarthroplasty compared with internal fixation for treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Internal fixation (IF) with cannulated screws is the most widely accepted operation method for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in elderly patients. However, there were higher rate of reoperation, severe complications and poorer functional outcomes reported in these patients treated with IF. The purpose of this research is to compare the prognosis, complications, reoperation and mortality of bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) with IF of cannulated screws in elderly patients.

METHODS

All elderly patients (>75 years of age) with nondisplaced FNFs from January 2010 to December 2015 at our institution were included in this study. Patients treated with HA and IF with cannulated screws were compared. Outcome measures included the surgical complications, perioperative parameters, hip joint function, reoperation and mortality.

RESULTS

The blood loss of HA group (150.0 ± 55.1 mL) was statistically more than IF group (40.5 ± 15.7 mL, p = 0.001). However, the blood transfusion rate was similar between two groups (p = 0.102). At the last follow-up, there were total 14 (34.1%) severe surgical complications in the IF group, compared to 9 (10.1%) in the HA group (P = 0.001). No difference was detected between two groups with respect to the HHS and VAS at the last follow-up. Compared with the HA group, the IF group had much more reoperation in the follow up period (p = 0.001). There was no statistically differences of mortality rate between HA group (39.3%, 35/89) and IF group (34.1%, 14/41) (p=0.571).

CONCLUSIONS

As a treatment option for nondisplaced intracapsular FNFs in elderly patients, HA showed the merits of a less surgical complications and less reoperations, while IF demonstrated a shorter surgical time and less intraoperative blood loss. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the hip joint function and mortality rate in midterm follow-up. Further evaluation with a longer follow-up is recommended to strengthen these findings.

Study protocol: HipSTHeR - a register-based randomised controlled trial - hip screws or (total) hip replacement for undisplaced femoral neck fractures in older patients

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures (FNFs), which are common in the older population, are associated with high mortality and morbidity. Some 20% of FNFs are undisplaced (uFNFs). The routine surgical procedure for uFNFs is internal fixation (IF) with 2-3 screws/pins with a reported reoperation rate in older patients (age ≥ 75 years) of up to 21%. The reoperation rate for hemiarthroplasties for displaced fractures is lower than for undisplaced fractures operated with IF. This study will aim to determine whether the outcome for older patients with an uFNF can be improved by replacing the hip instead of preserving it.

METHODS

A national multicentre, register-based, randomised controlled trial (rRCT) will be conducted. For this trial, 1440 patients, ≥75 years with an acute uFNF, will be allocated. Eligible patients will be identified by the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) platform, which will notify the admitting orthopaedic surgeon of eligibility. After informed consent has been given and documented, patients will be randomised to either IF (control group) or arthroplasty (intervention group) within the SFR platform. Injury mechanism, fracture classification, date of injury, and type of treatment are registered in the SFR. Type and brand of arthroplasty, surgical approach, and fixation are obtained from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR). The study cohort from the SFR will be cross-checked with the National Patient Register and the SHAR for outcome variables at 2, 5, and 10 years. The primary outcome will be a composite variable comprising reoperation rate and mortality at 2 years postoperatively. Secondary endpoints will include reoperation rate and mortality as stand-alone variables. In addition, secondary endpoints will be patient-reported outcomes as measured by the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment questionnaire at 1 year postoperatively as routinely collected within the SFR. Further secondary endpoints will include the occurrence of adverse events such as pneumonia, stroke or myocardial infarction and evaluation of the external validity of the study.

DISCUSSION

This large, multicentre, register-based randomised controlled trial could potentially shift the treatment of uFNFs in older patients towards primary hip arthroplasty in order to improve the outcome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03966716); May 29, 2019.

Factors that influence the complications and outcomes of femoral neck fractures treated by cannulated screw fixation

To investigate the influence of various factors on the two outcome parameters "procedure - specific complication" (femoral head necrosis, infection, nonunion, femoral neck shortening, screw loosening, implant penetration) and "functional outcome" in patients with displaced and undisplaced femoral neck fracture treated by cannulated screw fixation. All cases of a femoral neck fracture, operated by cannulated screw fixation, in the period from December 2014 to December 2017 were included. The observation period of the included patients was 12 months. Information on their outcome was collected after evaluation of current x-ray images and on request from the responsible further treatment physician. Continuous data were presented as mean value ± standard deviation, categorical data as absolute and relative frequency. The effect of potential factors on endpoints was estimated with a multivariable logistic regression analysis and 95% confidence intervals calculated. The null hypothesis Odds Ratio = 1 was checked by the Wald test. The likelihood ratio test was used to test for deviation from linearity. The mean age of the 56 included patients was 72 years (36 min, 96 max), 44.5% (n = 25) were male and 55.5% (n = 25) female. The femoral neck fractures were classified as follows: Garden I: 73%, Garden II: 16%, Garden III: 11%, Pauwels I: 73%, Pauwels II: 21%, Pauwels III: 5%, 31-B1: 73%, 31-B2: 27%, 31-B3: 0%. The factor patient age showed a statistically significant influence on the outcome parameter procedure-specific complication. None of the remaining factors examined showed a statistically significant influence on both outcome parameters procedure-specific complication and functional outcome. 69% of the patients from age 80 onwards suffered a procedure-specific complication. A rate of 41% procedure-specific complications as an outcome parameter in trauma surgery shows a necessity for improvement. The increasing risk of procedure-specific complications for patients with a femoral neck fracture treated by cannulated screw fixation is associated with rising patient age. A more stable head-perserving operative method or an endoprosthetic procedure should be considered in high-risk patients (≥80 y.o.).

Posterior and anterior tilt increases the risk of failure after internal fixation of Garden I and II femoral neck fracture

Background and purpose - Preoperative posterior tilt of the femoral head as seen on lateral radiographs has been reported to affect the risk of fixation failure in cases of minimally displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden I-II). We investigated radiological risk factors of treatment failure.Patients and methods - We included 417 patients (68% women, median age: 78 years (50-108) with a minimally displaced femoral neck fracture (Garden I-II) treated with internal fixation in a retrospective cohort study. The patients were followed for 3.4 years (2-14). Data on age, sex, housing, cognitive impairment, implant angulation, pre- and postoperative tilt, hip complications, and reoperations were recorded. The risk of fixation failure was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.Results - The overall reoperation rate was 17%, and the rate of treatment failure (fixation failure, nonunion, avascular necrosis, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis) was 13%. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed an increased risk of treatment failure with a preoperative posterior tilt of at least 20° and a preoperative anterior tilt greater than 10°. A failure occurred in 13 of the 65 patients with a posterior tilt of at least 20° and in 5 of the 9 patients with an anterior tilt greater than 10°.Interpretation - A preoperative posterior tilt of 20° and an anterior tilt greater than 10° in cases of Garden I and II femoral neck fractures increase the risk of fixation failure necessitating additional surgery. In this group of patients, there is a need for future interventional studies regarding the feasibility of primary hip arthroplasty.

Outcomes of internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with an undisplaced femoral neck fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although internal fixation has been the main treatment option for elderly patients with an undisplaced femoral neck fracture, it is associated with a high reoperation rate. Some surgeons have discussed the use of hemiarthroplasty, but there is limited literature comparing these two treatment modalities. In this study, we compared the perioperative results of hemiarthroplasty with internal fixation for undisplaced femoral neck fractures.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive review of literatures on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies. Of the 441 studies initially identified, 3 met all inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently graded study quality and abstracted relevant data including reoperation rate, mortality rate, Harris Hip Score (HHS), length of hospital stay, and operation duration.

Results

Our results revealed that hemiarthroplasty was associated with a lower reoperation rate than the internal fixation group (OR 4.489; 95% CI 2.030 to 9.927). Mortality rate at postoperative 1 month and 1 year and HHS at postoperative 1 year and 2 years were not different. Length of hospital stay (SMD − 0.800, 95% CI − 1.011 to − 0.589) and operation duration (SMD − 2.497, 95% CI − 2.801 to − 2.193) were shorter in the internal fixation group.

Conclusions

Compared with the internal fixation group, patients that underwent hemiarthroplasty had a lower reoperation rate and an equivalent overall mortality rate. Our meta-analysis suggests that hemiarthroplasty might be a better treatment choice than internal fixation in treating elderly patients with an undisplaced femoral neck fracture.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Outperforms Hemiarthroplasty in Patients Aged 65 Years and Older: A Propensity-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly individuals may be treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA). However, it is unclear what the short-term medical outcomes are related to these surgical options. The purpose of this study was to compare early postoperative outcomes in THA patients to those of HHA patients.

METHODS

In this study, we compared 30-day mortality, likelihood of still being in the hospital at 30 days, postoperative major and minor complications, discharge disposition, reoperation and readmission, length of stay, days from admission to surgery, and operative time between THA and HHA. Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database, hip fracture patients ≥65 years old from 2008 to 2016 were identified. After propensity score matching, there were 2795 THAs and 2795 HHAs. To assess the effect of THA on the above-mentioned outcomes, bivariate regression models were created.

RESULTS

The THA patients ≥65 years old were at reduced risk for mortality (P = .029) and still being in the hospital at 30 days (P = .017). The THA patients were at an increased risk for minor complications (P = .011) and longer operative times (P < .001). However, THA patients were more likely to have a home discharge (P < .001).

DISCUSSION

Patients ≥65 years who underwent THA for hip fractures had reduced short-term mortality risk, were more likely to be discharged home, and had less likelihood of being in the hospital at 30 days. This is the first study to explore short-term outcomes in patients ≥65 and has direct implications for alternate payment and merit-based payment models.

CONCLUSION

As hip fracture treatment has come under scrutiny with respect to alternate payment models and merit-based incentive payments, this analysis of short-term outcomes warrants consideration when evaluating treatment pathways.

Cephalomedullary nailing versus sliding hip screws for Intertrochanteric and basicervical hip fractures: a propensity-matched study of short-term outcomes in over 17,000 patients

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are associated with poor mortality and morbidity outcomes. Controversy exists over what the preferred treatment is between sliding hips screws (SHSs) and cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) for stable intertrochanteric (IT) and basicervical (BC) hip fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare early postoperative outcomes and complications in patients treated with SHS to those treated with CMN in IT and BC hip fractures.

METHODS

We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify IT and BC hip fractures, excluding subtrochanteric hip fractures treated with a SHS and CMN for 2008 to 2016. After propensity score matching, there were 8505 patients in the SHS cohort and 8505 in the CMN cohort. Propensity score-adjusted multivariate regression models assed SHS as an independent risk factor for the following 30-day outcomes: mortality, postoperative major and minor complications, discharge disposition, readmission and reoperation, length of hospital stay (LOS), and operative time.

RESULTS

No difference in mortality was encountered between SHS and CMN (p = 0.440). Compared to CMN, the SHS cohort had an 11.6% decreased likelihood of a minor complication (p < 0.001); however, no difference was found between CMN and SHS for major complications (p = 0.117). SHS patients were less likely to have transfusion (p < 0.001), DVT (p = 0.007), and MI (0.024). SHS patients were 12.5% more likely to go home (p = 0.002). No association was discovered between being treated with a SHS and reoperation (p = 0.449) and readmission (p = 0.588). SHS patients had almost a quarter of a day longer LOS (p = 0.041). Patients treated with SHS had a statistically significant (p < 0.001), but clinically irrelevant 2-min longer procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

[Research progress in treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly]

OBJECTIVE

To introduce the research progress of conservative treatment, internal fixation, hip arthroplasty, and multidisciplinary team (MDT) modes in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly.

METHODS

By consulting domestic and foreign literature in recent years, the characteristics and application of various treatment methods and new treatment modes for femoral neck fracture in the elderly were summarized and analyzed.

RESULTS

The elderly non-displaced femoral neck fracture should be treated surgically, and conservative treatment has a high risk of secondary displacement. The displaced fracture should be operated as soon as possible. There is no difference in long-term functional outcome between hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Hemiarthroplasty has less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, and is suitable for the elderly patients with poor basic condition. Total hip arthroplasty is suitable for the elderly patients with better basic condition and higher demand of life quality. MDT can effectively reduce preoperative waiting time and length of stay, reduce the incidence of medical complications, improve the nutritional status of patients, and reduce the mortality of patients.

CONCLUSION

Significant results have been achieved in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly by methods such as internal fixation, hip arthroplasty, and MDT.

Not all primary total hip arthroplasties are equal-so is there a difference in reimbursement?

Background

Relative value units (RVUs) are a physician reimbursement model based on the effort required, or value, in providing a procedure or service for a patient. Procedures such as conversion total hip arthroplasties (THAs) can be compared to primary THAs, but many studies have revealed increased difficulties in conversion cases. Despite the increased time and effort for conversion THA, it is unknown if this is reflected in the RVU compensation model. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the: (I) mean operative times; (II) mean RVUs; (III) RVU/minute for primary and conversion THAs; and (IV) perform an individualized idealized surgeon annual cost difference analysis.

Methods

A total of 103,702 primary THA patients were identified using CPT code 27130 and 2,986 conversion THA patients were identified using CPT code 27132 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. The mean RVUs, operative times (minutes), and RVU/minute were calculated and compared. An annualize cost analysis of dollar amounts per case, day, and the year was also performed.

Results

The mean operative times for the primary and conversion THA cohorts were 94 vs. 146 minutes (P<0.001) and mean RVUs were 21.24 vs. 25.68 (P<0.001). Interestingly, the mean RVU per minute was higher for the primary THA compared to the conversion THA groups (0.26 vs. 0.21, P<0.001). Annualized cost analysis revealed a potential $173,529 difference from performing primary vs. conversion THAs.

Conclusions

Even though conversion THA can be considered to a more complex and demanding procedure, based on RVUs per minute of surgery, orthopaedic surgeons are reimbursed better for primary THA cases. This data could be used by orthopaedic surgeons to administer their practices better to yield the highest return on time.

Factors associated with the development of avascular necrosis of the femoral head after non-displaced femoral neck fracture treated with internal fixation

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors with influence on the development of avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH) in patients with non-displaced femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Retrospective study of cases and controls. We included non-displaced femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation, and that presented ANFH with a postoperative follow-up of at least 2 years. The baseline variables, active comorbidities of the patients, the time for surgery and the number of screws used for osteosynthesis were recorded. Comparisons were made between the groups, those that presented ANFH and those that did not. By area under the curve, the cut-offs of age and time for surgery were located.

RESULTS

An association between sex, active comorbidities and number of screws used and the development of ANFH was not observed. The cut-off points for age and time for surgery were≤69 years and≤43hours, respectively. No significant correlation was observed for the cut-off time for surgery. In the multivariate analysis, age≤69 years was a significant predictor of the development of ANFH (OR 4.6; 95% CI 1.1 to 17.9; P=.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The patients aged 69 years or younger were at increased risk of developing ANFH after undisplaced femoral neck fracture treated with percutaneous screws.