Body Mass Index and Clinical Benefit of Fulvestrant in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer

Visceral obesity and sarcopenia as predictors of efficacy and hematological toxicity in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate whether visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and skeletal muscle area (SMA) index are predictive for efficacy and hematological toxicity in ER + HER2-metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients who received CDK 4/6 inhibitors.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 52 patients who were treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors between January 2018 and February 2021. The values of VAT, SAT, SMA indices and hematological parameters were noted before the start, at the third and sixth months of this treatment. The skeletal muscle area (SMA) and adipose tissue measurements were calculated at the level of the third lumbar vertebra. A SMA-index value of <40 cm2/m2 was accepted as the threshold value for sarcopenia.

RESULTS

Patients with sarcopenia had a worse progression-free survival (PFS) compared to patients without sarcopenia (19.6 vs. 9.0 months, p = 0.005). Patients with a high-VAT-index had a better PFS (20.4 vs. 9.3 months, p = 0.033). Only the baseline low-SMA- index (HR: 3.89; 95% CI: 1.35-11.25, p = 0.012) and baseline low-VAT-index (HR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.02-4.53, p = 0.042) had significantly related to poor PFS in univariate analyses. The low-SMA-index was the only independent factor associated with poor PFS (HR: 3.99; 95% CI: 1.38-11.54, p = 0.011). No relationship was observed between body composition parameters and grade 3-4 hematological toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The present study supported the significance of sarcopenia and low visceral adipose tissue as potential early indicators of poor PFS in patients treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors.

The Challenges of Treating Patients with Breast Cancer and Obesity

Obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² or more and is associated with worse outcomes in patients with breast cancer, resulting in an increased incidence of breast cancer, recurrence, and death. The incidence of obesity is increasing, with almost half of all individuals in the United States classified as obese. Patients with obesity present with unique pharmacokinetics and physiology and are at increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease, which leads to specific challenges when treating these patients. The aim of this review is to summarize the impact of obesity on the efficacy and toxicity of systemic therapies used for breast cancer patients, describe the molecular mechanisms through which obesity can affect systemic therapies, outline the existing American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines for treating patients with cancer and obesity, and highlight additional clinical considerations for treating patients with obesity and breast cancer. We conclude that further research on the biological mechanisms underlying the obesity-breast cancer link may offer new treatment strategies, and clinicals trials that focus on the treatment and outcomes of patients with obesity and all stages of breast cancer are needed to inform future treatment guidelines.

Retrospective Evaluation of Fulvestrant Efficacy and Clinical Results in Patients Using Fulvestrant

AIM

Fulvestrant is a drug used in the treatment of metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (mHRPBC). Although clinical trials have shown the efficacy of fulvestrant, real-life data are limited and data from clinical trials and real-life settings sometimes may be seen differently. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed mHRPBC patients followed in our center and taking fulvestrant to evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of the drug and also to identify factors affecting the efficacy and clinical outcomes of fulvestrant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who were followed up with the diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer between 2010 and 2022 and using fulvestrant were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.13-10.18] months and the median overall survival time was 28 (95% CI: 22.53-34.93) months. According to multivariate analyses, PFS was associated with age (p=0.041), body mass index (BMI) (p=0.043), brain metastasis (p=0.033), fulvestrant line (p=0.002), and use of pre-fulvestrant chemotherapy (p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Fulvestrant is an effective drug in mHRPBC. Fulvestrant is more effective in patients whose BMI index is under 30, without brain metastases, without prior chemotherapy, under 65 years of age, and used fulvestrant in the early treatment line. The efficacy of fulvestrant may vary according to age and BMI.

Do body composition parameters correlate with response to targeted therapy in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients? Role of sarcopenia and obesity

Purpose

To investigate the association between body composition parameters, sarcopenia, obesity and prognosis in patients with metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer under therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors.

Methods

92 patients with biopsy-proven metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer, treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors between 2018 and 2021 at our center, were included in this retrospective analysis. Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT), Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT) and Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) were measured before starting therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitors (Palbociclib, Abemaciclib or Ribociclib). Measurements were performed on a computed tomography-derived abdominal image at third lumbar vertebra (L3) level by an automatic dedicated software (Quantib body composition^®, Rotterdam, Netherlands). Visceral obesity was defined as a VAT area > 130 cm². Sarcopenia was defined as SMI < 40 cm²/m². Changes in breast lesion size were evaluated after 6 months of treatment. Response to therapy was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Spearman’s correlation and χ² analyses were performed.

Results

Out of 92 patients, 30 were included in the evaluation. Of the 30 patients (mean age 53 ± 12 years), 7 patients were sarcopenic, 16 were obese, while 7 patients were neither sarcopenic nor obese. Statistical analyses showed that good response to therapy was correlated to higher SMI values (p < 0.001), higher VAT values (p = 0.008) and obesity (p = 0.007); poor response to therapy was correlated to sarcopenia (p < 0.001). Moreover, there was a significant association between sarcopenia and menopause (p = 0.021) and between sarcopenia and the persistence of axillary lymphadenopathies after treatment (p = 0.003), while the disappearance of axillary lymphadenopathies was associated with obesity (p = 0.028).

Conclusions

There is a growing interest in body composition, especially in the field of breast cancer. Our results showed an interesting correlation between sarcopenia and progression of disease, and demonstrated that VAT can positively influence the response to targeted therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Clinical Relevance

Sarcopenia and obesity seem to predict negative outcomes in many oncologic entities. Their prevalence and impact in current breast cancer care are promising but still controversial.

Obesity and endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer: Mechanistic insights and perspectives

The incidence of obesity, a recognized risk factor for various metabolic and chronic diseases, including numerous types of cancers, has risen dramatically over the recent decades worldwide. To date, convincing research in this area has painted a complex picture about the adverse impact of high body adiposity on breast cancer onset and progression. However, an emerging but overlooked issue of clinical significance is the limited efficacy of the conventional endocrine therapies with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or degraders (SERDs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in patients affected by breast cancer and obesity. The mechanisms behind the interplay between obesity and endocrine therapy resistance are likely to be multifactorial. Therefore, what have we actually learned during these years and which are the main challenges in the field? In this review, we will critically discuss the epidemiological evidence linking obesity to endocrine therapeutic responses and we will outline the molecular players involved in this harmful connection. Given the escalating global epidemic of obesity, advances in understanding this critical node will offer new precision medicine-based therapeutic interventions and more appropriate dosing schedule for treating patients affected by obesity and with breast tumors resistant to endocrine therapies.

Clinical Implications of Body Mass Index in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Abemaciclib and Endocrine Therapy

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding the impact of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes in advanced breast cancer, especially in patients treated with endocrine therapy (ET) + cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors.

METHODS

A pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from MONARCH 2 and 3 trials was performed. Patients were classified according to baseline BMI into underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2) and divided into 2 treatment groups: abemaciclib + ET vs placebo + ET. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to BMI in each treatment group. Secondary endpoints were response rate, adverse events according to BMI, and loss of weight (≥5% from baseline) during treatment.

RESULTS

This analysis included 1138 patients (757 received abemaciclib + ET and 381 placebo + ET). There was no difference in PFS between BMI categories in either group, although normal-weight patients presented a numerically higher benefit with abemaciclib + ET (Pinteraction = .07). Normal and/or underweight patients presented higher overall response rate in the abemaciclib + ET group compared with overweight and/or obese patients (49.4% vs 41.6%, odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval = 0.54 to 0.99) as well as higher neutropenia frequency (51.0% vs 40.4%, P = .004). Weight loss was more frequent in the abemaciclib + ET group (odds ratio = 3.23, 95% confidence interval = 2.09 to 5.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding abemaciclib to ET prolongs PFS regardless of BMI, showing that overweight or obese patients also benefit from this regimen. Our results elicit the possibility of a better effect of abemaciclib in normal and/or underweight patients compared with overweight and/or obese patients. More studies analyzing body composition parameters in patients under treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors may further clarify this hypothesis.

Effect of body mass index on response to neo-adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of the NeoALTTO trial

Background

Obesity is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC) development, recurrence, and death. In view of this, we aimed to investigate the clinical value of obesity in BC patients treated with anti-HER2 therapies in the NeoALTTO trial, which randomized 455 patients to neo-adjuvant lapatinib, trastuzumab, or their combination plus paclitaxel.

Methods

Patients were classified according to their basal body mass index (BMI) into underweight (< 18.5 kg/m²), normal (≥ 18.5; < 25 kg/m²), overweight (≥ 25; < 30 kg/m²), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m²) WHO categories. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using BMI as a categorical variable. Pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) were the NeoALTTO primary and secondary outcomes, respectively.

Results

Among 454 patients analyzed, 14 (3%), 220 (48%), 137 (30%), and 83 (18%) were classified as underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese, respectively; 231 (51%) and 223 (49%) had hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HR-negative primary tumors; 160 (35%) achieved pCR. In the overall patient population, no association was found between BMI groups and pCR, as we reported pCR rates of 57.1%, 35%, 30.7%, and 39.8% in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese cases, respectively. In contrast, in HR-positive tumors, overweight or obesity was generally associated with decreased likelihood of achieving a pCR independently of other clinical variables, including planned surgery, nodal status, and tumor size (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, 95%CI 0.30–1.01, as compared to normal or underweight; p = 0.053); notably, no differential effect of BMI with respect to pCR was observed in HR-negative cases (odds ratio [OR] = 1.30, 95%CI 0.76–2.23, as compared to normal or underweight; p = 0.331), resulting in a statistically significant interaction between BMI and HR status (p = 0.036). There was no association between BMI and EFS neither in the overall nor in the HR-positive population, but this analysis was under-powered.

Conclusions

NeoALTTO patients overweight or obese at baseline and with HR-positive primary BC appeared less likely to achieve pCR after neo-adjuvant anti-HER2 therapies. This finding paves the way to future research in targeting the interplay between HER2/HR signaling and metabolism.

Computed tomography-based analyses of baseline body composition parameters and changes in breast cancer patients under treatment with CDK 4/6 inhibitors

PURPOSE

Body composition parameters including muscle and adipose tissue measurements have emerged as prognostic factors in cancer patients. Besides cell cycle regulation, CDK 4 and 6 also control metabolic processes (lipid synthesis, glycolysis, and mitochondrial function). We studied the impact of baseline body composition parameters on response to CDK 4/6 inhibition and changes on body composition during treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 50 patients treated at Institut Jules Bordet between December 2016 and August 2019 with endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitor as first or second-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (BC). CT-based body composition analysis was performed at 3 time points. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier method were used for the association with Progression-free survival (PFS). Changes in body composition parameters were described in means and compared using paired sampled T test.

RESULTS

Baseline sarcopenia was present in 40% of patients and associated with a significantly worse PFS compared to patients without sarcopenia (20.8 vs 9.6 months, HR 2.52; 95% CI 1.02-6.19, p = 0.037). Patients with higher visceral fat index and higher visceral fat density had better PFS (20.8 vs 10.4 months, HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.99 p = 0.041-stratified for treatment line). No significant alterations in body composition parameters during treatment were observed.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia is a potential early marker of poor prognosis among patients with metastatic BC treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors. CT scan evaluation of sarcopenia and adiposity revealed significant prognostic information. Visceral fat could also play an important role in response to CDK 4/6 inhibitors, deserving further investigation.

Decreased Efficacy of Doxorubicin Corresponds With Modifications in Lipid Metabolism Markers and Fatty Acid Profiles in Breast Tumors From Obese vs. Lean Mice

Breast cancer cells modulate lipid and fatty acid metabolism to sustain proliferation. The role of adipocytes in cancer treatment efficacy remains, however, to be fully elucidated. We investigated whether diet-induced obesity (DIO) affects the efficacy of doxorubicin treatment in a breast tumor-bearing mouse model. Female C57BL6 mice were fed a high fat or low fat diet for the full duration of the study (12 weeks). After 8 weeks, mice were inoculated with E0771 triple-negative breast cancer cells in the fourth mammary gland to develop breast tumor allographs. Tumor-bearing mice received either vehicle (Hank's balanced salt solution) or doxorubicin (chemotherapy). Plasma inflammatory markers, tumor, and mammary adipose tissue fatty acid composition, as well as protein expression of lipid metabolism markers were determined. The high fat diet (HFD) attenuated the treatment efficacy of doxorubicin. Both leptin and resistin concentrations were significantly increased in the HFD group treated with doxorubicin. Suppressed lipogenesis (decreased stearoyl CoA-desaturase-1) and lipolysis (decreased hormone-sensitive lipase) were observed in mammary adipose tissue of the DIO animals, whereas increased expression was observed in the tumor tissue of doxorubicin treated HFD mice. Obesogenic conditions induced altered tissue fatty acid (FA) compositions, which reduced doxorubicin's treatment efficacy. In mammary adipose tissue breast cancer cells suppressed the storage of FAs, thereby increasing the availability of free FAs and favored inflammation under obesogenic conditions.

Efficacy and Safety of Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Japanese Patients With ER+/HER2- Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Published data have shown that palbociclib-fulvestrant can significantly improve the progression-free survival (PFS) of estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer patients, but not of Japanese patients. We conducted this retrospective study to verify the efficacy and safety of palbociclib-fulvestrant in Japanese patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with fulvestrant (n=39) or palbociclib-fulvestrant (n=31) at the Saitama Medical Center from July 2012 to November 2018 were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall response rates (ORRs) were 2.6% (fulvestrant) and 41.9% (palbociclib-fulvestrant) (p<0.001), and clinical benefit rates (CBRs) were 23.1% and 61.3% (p=0.002), respectively. The palbociclib-fulvestrant group had significantly higher CBR and PFS (hazard ratio(HR):0.272, 95% confidence interval(95CI):0.128-0.574 for PFS). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 80.6% of the palbociclib-fulvestrant group, while febrile neutropenia was not detected.

CONCLUSION

Japanese ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients tolerated palbociclib-fulvestrant, with significantly improved clinical outcomes.

Fatty acids: Adiposity and breast cancer chemotherapy, a bad synergy?

Globally, breast cancer continues to be a major concern in women's health. Lifestyle related risk factors, specifically excess adipose tissue (adiposity) has reached epidemic proportions and has been identified as a major risk factor in the development of breast cancer. Dysfunctional adipose tissue has evoked research focusing on its association with metabolic-related conditions, breast cancer risk and progression. Adipose dysfunction in coordination with immune cells and inflammation, are responsible for accelerated cell growth and survival of cancer cells. Recently, evidence also implicates adiposity as a potential risk factor for chemotherapy resistance. Chemotherapeutic agents have been shown to negatively impact adipose tissue. Since adipose tissue is a major storage site for fatty acids, it is not unlikely that these negative effects may disrupt adipose tissue homeostasis. It is therefore argued that fatty acid composition may be altered due to the chemotherapeutic pharmacokinetics, which in turn could have severe health related outcomes. The underlying molecular mechanisms elucidating the effects of fatty acid composition in adiposity-linked drug resistance are still unclear and under explored. This review focuses on the potential role of adiposity in breast cancer and specifically emphasizes the role of fatty acids in cancer progression and treatment resistance.

Body mass index and prognosis of breast cancer: An analysis by menstruation status when breast cancer diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether obesity/overweight is a risk predictor for breast cancer recurrence and death by menopausal status in a retrospective study.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 1017 breast cancer patients treated in our hospital from January 2004 to December 2012. Three groups were divided according to body mass index (BMI) when breast cancer diagnosis: normal weight, BMI < 25.0 kg/m; overweight, 25.0≤BMI < 30.0 kg/m; and obesity, BMI≥30.0 kg/m. The clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients within 5 years following breast cancer diagnosed were analyzed. Subgroup analyses of BMI on breast cancer prognosis were analyzed according to the menopausal status when breast cancer diagnosis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Overweight and obesity groups were associated with larger size tumors, older age, increased proportion of postmenopausal patients and less patients choosing anthracycline and/or taxane regimen. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) decreased in overweight and obese patients (P < .001), and both overweight and obesity were independent predictors for increased risks of breast cancer relapse and death (P < .001). When stratified by menopausal status, both overweight and obesity were associated with reduced 5-year DFS and OS in postmenopausal patients (P < .050), and multivariate analysis showed that the risk of relapse and breast cancer mortality in these 2 groups also increased (P < .050). Among premenopausal patients, the risks of relapse and death were significantly increased in obesity group rather than overweight group by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Overweight and obesity might be independently associated with poorer prognosis for breast cancer patients, and the effects of overweight on the breast cancer prognosis seem to be related to menopausal status.

Impact of body mass index on the efficacy of endocrine therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer - A retrospective two-center cohort study

BAKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the efficacy of endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with metastatic hormone receptor breast cancer (HR+BC) as well as to identify if the potential difference in efficacy was associated with Fulvestrant only or both aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and Fulvestrant.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of postmenopausal women with HR+metastatic breast cancer that have received endocrine therapy including Fulvestrant as a metastatic treatment strategy at the Departments of Oncology in Eskilstuna and Uppsala, Sweden, between 2008 and 2016 were identified. The primary outcome of the study was time to disease progression (TTP) during the treatment with Fulvestrant in overweight and obese women compared to patient with normal BMI.

RESULTS

In total, 173 patients were enrolled in the study cohort, amongst these, 141 patients received both Fulvestrant and AIs and 32 received only Fulvestrant. No statistical significant association was observed between the three BMI categories and TTP, during Fulvestrant treatment (p = 0.136). The rates of objective response and clinical benefit due to Fulvestrant were similar among patients with normal weight, overweight and obesity, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in treatment efficacy was seen between normal, overweight and obese women with metastatic HR+BC, when treated with Fulvestrant. Until further research with prospective studies is available, there is no evidence to support any modification in how Fulvestrant treatment is used in patients with metastatic breast cancer in regard to BMI.

Chemoresistance: Intricate Interplay Between Breast Tumor Cells and Adipocytes in the Tumor Microenvironment

Excess adipose tissue is a hallmark of an overweight and/or obese state as well as a primary risk factor for breast cancer development and progression. In an overweight/obese state adipose tissue becomes dysfunctional due to rapid hypertrophy, hyperplasia, and immune cell infiltration which is associated with sustained low-grade inflammation originating from dysfunctional adipokine synthesis. Evidence also supports the role of excess adipose tissue (overweight/obesity) as a casual factor for the development of chemotherapeutic drug resistance. Obesity-mediated effects/modifications may contribute to chemotherapeutic drug resistance by altering drug pharmacokinetics, inducing chronic inflammation, as well as altering tumor-associated adipocyte adipokine secretion. Adipocytes in the breast tumor microenvironment enhance breast tumor cell survival and decrease the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents, resulting in chemotherapeutic resistance. A well-know chemotherapeutic agent, doxorubicin, has shown to negatively impact adipose tissue homeostasis, affecting adipose tissue/adipocyte functionality and storage. Here, it is implied that doxorubicin disrupts adipose tissue homeostasis affecting the functionality of adipose tissue/adipocytes. Although evidence on the effects of doxorubicin on adipose tissue/adipocytes under obesogenic conditions are lacking, this narrative review explores the potential role of obesity in breast cancer progression and treatment resistance with inflammation as an underlying mechanism.

Anthropometric, clinical and molecular determinants of treatment outcomes in postmenopausal, hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with fulvestrant: Results from a real word setting

To characterize determinants of treatment outcome in a real world population of 161 post-menopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with fulvestrant. Descriptive statistics for demographics, anthropometrics, clinical and molecular characteristic were compared across subgroups of sensitivity/resistance to prior endocrine therapy and tested in uni/multivariate models. Clinical benefit was more common in sensitive patients with higher estrogen receptor expression and when fulvestrant was given in first line (p=0.02 and 0.046). In resistant patients, PFS was longer with lower BMI (p=0.01). Among endocrine sensitive women, longer PFS was associated with fulvestrant in first-line, single metastasis and no visceral involvement (p=0.01, 0.003 and 0.01). OS was shorter in resistant patients with HER2-positive disease and if fulvestrant was given in second and subsequent line (p=0.03). In sensitive patients, we observed worse OS with multiple metastases (p=0.008). Multivariate analyses confirmed longer PFS in resistant patients with lower BMI and older age (p=0.002 and 0.007). OS in resistant patients was negatively influenced by HER2 positivity and fulvestrant in second and subsequent line (p=0.04). In sensitive women, multiple metastases were associated with poorer survival (p=0.002). This evidence encourages considering patient and disease characteristics in decision making and outcome interpretation for patients candidate to fulvestrant.