Therapeutic management options for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Durvalumab as consolidation therapy in patients who received chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC: Real-world data from an expanded access program in Brazil (LACOG 0120)

OBJECTIVE

The PACIFIC trial established standard therapy for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who did not progress after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy. However, real-world data, particularly from Latin America, remain limited. The LACOG 0120 study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of consolidation therapy with durvalumab in a real-world setting in Brazil.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab consolidation therapy through an expanded access program were evaluated. The primary objective was to assess progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), treatment compliance, and safety, with a focus on the incidence and severity of immune-mediated adverse events (NCT04948411).

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients from seven centers were evaluated. Median follow-up was 50.3 months (95% CI: 48.6-54.4). Median PFS was 9.9 months (95% CI: 7.3-52.4), with a 36 month-PFS of 34.5% (95% CI: 17.7-52.1). Median OS was 34.9 months (95% CI: 26.0-NR), and the 36 month-OS was 46.3% (95% CI: 25.7-64.6). Durvalumab was administered for a median of 17 cycles (10 to 24), with 45.2% of patients completing the planned therapy. The main reason for discontinuation was disease progression. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 12 patients (38.7%), with grade 3 events reported in two (6.5%). Pneumonitis was observed in 4 patients (12.9%) - grade 3 in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

PFS was lower in this analysis compared to the PACIFIC trial; however, OS was similar, indicating comparable efficacy in a real-world setting among Brazilian patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. No new safety concerns were identified.

Metformin inhibits migration and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer cells through AMPK-mediated GDF15 induction

The growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) may serve as a biomarker of metformin, which mediates the bodyweight lowering effect of metformin. However, whether GDF15 also serves as a molecular target of metformin to inhibit carcinogenesis remains largely unknown. This study examined the role and molecular mechanisms of GDF15 in the anticancer effects of metformin in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, which has never been reported before. We found that metformin significantly inhibited the migration of NSCLC A549 and NCI-H460 cells and reduced the expression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related molecules, including neuro-cadherin (N-cadherin), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), and the zinc finger transcription factor Snail, but increased epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) expression. Furthermore, metformin increased GDF15 and its upstream transcription factors activated transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and C/EBP-homologous protein (CHOP) expressions and increased AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation in NSCLC cells. GDF15 siRNA partially reverses the inhibitory effect of metformin on NSCLC cell migration. Moreover, metformin-induced increases in GDF15, CHOP, and ATF4 expression and the inhibition of migration were partially reversed by treatment with Compound C, a specific AMPK inhibitor. Meanwhile, metformin significantly inhibited NCI-H460 xenograft tumor growth in nude mice, increased GDF15 expression, and regulated EMT- and migration-related protein expression in xenograft tumors. In conclusion, our results provide novel insights into revealing that GDF15 can serve as a potential molecular target of metformin owing to its anti-cancer effect in NSCLC, which is mediated by AMPK activation.

Mapping the patient journey and treatment patterns in early-stage (stage I-III) non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

We map the patient journey from symptom onset to intervention and describe primary treatment in a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients in a large healthcare-provider.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed adult patients diagnosed with stages I-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2016 and 2019 were identified from the Israel National Cancer Registry and chart review was performed to extract de-identified data. The following timelines were constructed: from symptom onset to imaging, imaging to biopsy, and biopsy to primary treatment initiation. Cutoff: 31st December 2021. The initial symptom was captured up to one year prior to biopsy.

RESULTS

Among 302 patients (41 % female, 70 % >=65 years, 79 % former or current smoking, 62 % adenocarcinoma), 34.1 % stage I, 10.3 % stage II, 42.1 % stage III and 13.6 % unknown (AJCC ver. 8). In the baseline year, 80.5 % of patients reported at least one symptom to their physician, and 12.3 % reported four or more symptoms. The most common symptoms reported were cough (29.8 %), pneumonia (24.2 %), chest pain (18.5 %), bronchitis (17.5 %) and wheezing (17.2 %). For patients with an initial symptom (n=243) median time from symptom onset to imaging was 5.5 months (95% CI:4.8-6.3), and time from imaging to primary treatment initiation was 2.6 (2.3-2.9) months in all patients. Total duration from symptom to intervention was 8.5 months (7.6-9.3). Over 93 % of stage I patients underwent surgery and 4.9 % received definitive radiation. Over 83 % of stage II patients underwent surgery; of these, 54.8 % received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of stage III patients, 68.5 % received definitive chemoradiation (half received durvalumab), and the remaining underwent surgery with adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSION

A total of 80.5 % of patients were symptomatic and the median duration from symptom onset to treatment initiation was 8.5 month long. Improving patient and physician awareness to lung cancer symptoms, and the introduction of screening programs are essential for reducing those delays.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In 2018, the treatment options for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) changed with durvalumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), which was approved for consolidation therapy following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) without disease progression. Despite durvalumab's clinical benefit, many patients receiving this therapy developed progression. This study evaluated treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in real-world community oncology practices for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received cCRT.

METHODS

This study used The US Oncology Network's (iKnowMed) electronic health record database supplemented by chart review and included adults diagnosed with unresectable stage III NSCLC initiating cCRT between 11/01/2017 and 10/31/2019, with follow-up through 04/30/2022. cCRT included concurrent treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy (+/-14 days). Real-world overall survival (rwOS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were estimated from cCRT initiation using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among 426 patients, 61.5% received durvalumab post-cCRT (cCRT+durvalumab) and 38.5% did not (cCRT alone). Death (28.3%) and disease progression (22.2%) were the most common reasons for not initiating durvalumab. The median age for the cCRT+durvalumab and cCRT alone cohorts were 70 and 71 years, and 71.8% and 61.6% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, respectively. 51.5% of cCRT+durvalumab discontinued durvalumab, primarily due to adverse events (35.8%) and disease progression (28.4%). Median rwOS was 50.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]:41.4, not reached) and 11.6 (95% CI:6.5,15.9) months for cCRT+durvalumab and cCRT alone, respectively. Median rwPFS was 28.5 (95% CI:23.3,36.4) months for cCRT+durvalumab and 6.3 (95% CI:4.3,9.3) months for cCRT alone, respectively. 23.7% (cCRT+durvalumab) and 26.2% (cCRT alone) received subsequent treatment, of which, 59.7% (cCRT+durvalumab) and 46.5% (cCRT alone) received ICI.

CONCLUSION

Four out of ten patients did not receive consolidation durvalumab mainly due to disease progression. Even among patients who initiated durvalumab, many patients relapsed and were retreated with ICIs. These findings underscore the need to refine treatment strategies for better outcomes in stage III unresectable NSCLC.

Real-World Outcomes of Subsequent Chemotherapy after Progression Following Chemoradiation and Consolidative Durvalumab Therapy in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis from the CRIMSON Study (HOPE-005)

BACKGROUND

The optimal subsequent treatment strategy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and consolidative durvalumab therapy remains unknown. We aimed to determine the optimal subsequent treatment strategy for this clinical population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 523 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CRT and analyzed the treatment outcomes of subsequent therapy after progression following CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy. Patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors as subsequent therapy were excluded.

RESULTS

Out of 122 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy, 55% underwent platinum-based, 25% non-platinum-based, and 20% immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing therapies. In the platinum-based group, patients with a durvalumab-progression-free survival (Dur-PFS) ≥ 1 year had a significantly longer median subsequent therapy-PFS (SubTx-PFS) than those with Dur-PFS < 1 year (13.2 months vs. 4.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.97; P = .04). Furthermore, among patients receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy, the median SubTx-PFS was longer in the combined with angiogenesis inhibitor group than in the without group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference of SubTx-PFS was observed between the reason for durvalumab discontinuation and the outcomes of ICI-containing therapy.

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge is frequently employed following progression subsequent to CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy for LA-NSCLC. Optimal treatment strategies may consider Dur-PFS and angiogenesis inhibitor feasibility. Further research is warranted to identify clinical biomarkers that can help identify patients who would benefit from ICI rechallenge.

Assessment of radiation pneumonitis and predictive factors in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a dose-limiting toxicity associated with increased mortality for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This study aims to assess the incidence of symptomatic RP (grade 2-5), rate of recovery and associated predictive factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective population-based study including 602 patients with NSCLC who were treated with CRT between 2002 and 2016. RP and rate of recovery were analysed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to analyse potential predictive factors for the two endpoints RP grade ≥ 2 and RP grade ≥ 3.

RESULTS

A total of 136 (23%) patients developed symptomatic RP and 37 (6%) developed RP grade ≥ 3. A total of 67 (71%) recovered, whereas the remaining 27 (29%), with the major proportion of patients belonging to the RP grade ≥ 3 group, suffered from prevailing sequelae. On multivariable analysis, the selected model for predicting RP grade ≥ 2 included the factors V20, smoking status, average fractions per week and chemotherapy agent. V20 and age were selected factors for RP grade ≥ 3.

INTERPRETATION

The results suggest that regardless of all proposed factors predictive for RP, the most important influenceable significant factor still is dose to the lung. The main aim should be to avoid RP grade ≥ 3, where a substantial proportion of patients suffer from prevailing sequalae. Consequently, the technical improvement and precision of radiotherapy delivery should continue to focus on lung sparing techniques also in the ongoing immunotherapy-containing schedules where the risk of pneumonitis may be increased. e factor still is dose to the lung. Consequently, the technical improvement and precision of radiotherapy delivery should continue to focus on lung sparing techniques also in the ongoing immunotherapy-containing schedules where the risk of pneumonitis may be increased.

Dose-Volume Constraints Parameters for Lung Tissue in Thoracic Radiotherapy Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment

Purpose

This study aims to identify risk factors associated with symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP, Grade ≥ 2) following immunotherapy preceding thoracic radiotherapy (ICI-TRT) and establish safe dose constraints.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study enrolled patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of symptomatic RP (Grade ≥ 2), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Clinical and lung dosimetric parameters were analyzed to determine their associations with symptomatic RP. Dosimetric parameters included mean lung dose (MLD) and the percentage of lung volume receiving ≥10 Gy (V10), ≥20 Gy (V20), ≥30 Gy (V30), and ≥40 Gy (V40). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to predict the risk of developing symptomatic RP to establish optimal threshold values for each dosimetric predictor.

Results

Among the 118 patients included, the incidence of symptomatic RP was 25.4%. Tumor locations, intervals between immunotherapy and radiotherapy, and MLD, V10, V20, V30, and V40 were identified as independent risk factors for symptomatic RP. The area under the curve (AUC) values for MLD, V10, V20, V30, and V40 were 0.788 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.704-0.873), 0.789 (95% CI 0.705-0.874), 0.791 (95% CI 0.706-0.876), 0.784 (95% CI 0.697-0.871), and 0.749 (95% CI 0.656-0.842), respectively. The optimal threshold values for MLD, V10, V20, V30, and V40 were 9.7 Gy, 26.3%, 15.9%, 13.3%, and 8.6%, respectively. These thresholds are lower than current guideline recommendations, and maintaining dosimetric parameters below these values resulted in a cumulative symptomatic RP incidence of <12%.

Conclusion

The recommended dose thresholds for MLD, V10, V20, V30, and V40 are lower than the current guidelines, underscoring the importance of radiotherapy planning to minimize symptomatic RP occurrence in patients receiving ICI-TRT.

Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Outcomes of Short-Course Consolidation Immunotherapy in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

The current standard of care for patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer includes chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by 1 year of checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy. Nevertheless, the optimal duration of consolidation CPI remains unknown. Here, we characterized the relationship between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) minimal residual disease (MRD) and clinical outcomes of patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated on a phase 2 trial of short-course consolidation immunotherapy after CRT, with the goal of testing whether ctDNA may be able to identify patients who do not require a full year of treatment.

METHODS

Plasma samples for ctDNA analysis were collected from patients on the Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium LUN 16-081 trial after completion of CRT, before day 1 of cycle 2 (C2D1) of CPI (i.e., 1 mo after treatment start), and at the end of up to 6 months of treatment. Tumor-informed ctDNA MRD analysis was performed using cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing. Levels of ctDNA at each time point were correlated with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Detection of ctDNA predicted significantly inferior progression-free survival after completion of CRT (24-mo 29% versus 65%, p = 0.0048), before C2D1 of CPI (24-mo 0% versus 72%, p < 0.0001) and at the end of CPI (24-mo 15% versus 67%, p = 0.0011). In addition, patients with decreasing or undetectable ctDNA levels after 1 cycle of CPI had improved outcomes compared with patients with increasing ctDNA levels (24-mo progression-free survival 72% versus 0%, p < 0.0001). Progression of disease occurred within less than 12 months of starting CPI in all patients with increasing ctDNA levels at C2D1.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of ctDNA before, during, or after 6 months of consolidation CPI is strongly associated with inferior outcomes. Our findings suggest that analysis of ctDNA MRD may enable personalizing the duration of consolidation immunotherapy treatment.