Reverse-total shoulder arthroplasty cost-effectiveness: A quality-adjusted life years comparison with total hip arthroplasty

Delayed elective total shoulder arthroplasty: causes and eventual outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for delays in planned total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and determine the perioperative outcomes of TSAs that experienced a delay.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried from 2006 to 2019 for primary TSA. Delayed TSA was defined as surgery that occurred greater than one day after hospital admission. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and post-operative complications were collected and compared; the incidence of delayed TSA was analyzed.

RESULTS

The delayed patients were older, had a higher BMI, a higher rate of recent prior major surgery, and more comorbidities. Delayed patients had higher rates of postoperative complications, return to the OR, and 30-day readmission. Between 2006 and 2019, the rate of delayed TSA decreased.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should take care to ensure that patients with comorbidities undergo thorough preoperative clearance to prevent same-day cancellations and postoperative complications.

A two-year comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty mini-humeral tray and augmented mini-glenoid baseplate implants vs. standard implants

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are getting younger with greater function expectations. This retrospective, longitudinal study of prospectively collected data compared perceived shoulder function and strength, active shoulder mobility, radiographic evidence of scapular notching, and implant survival over the initial 2-years post-RTSA among patient groups who received either standard central fixation point liner and glenoid baseplate implants, or lower size profile mini-humeral tray with offset trunnion options and mini-augmented glenoid baseplate implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent primary RTSA using standard central fixation point liner and glenoid baseplate implants (Group 1, n = 180) were compared with patients who underwent primary RTSA using lower size profile mini-humeral tray with offset trunnion options and mini-augmented glenoid baseplate implants (Group 2, n = 53) for active shoulder mobility, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, perceived ability to lift 10 lbs (4.5 kg) overhead, radiographic evidence of scapular notching, and implant survival. Data was collected pre-surgery, 6-weeks, 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years post-RTSA (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

More Group 2 patients had more complex B or C Walch glenoid morphology, while Group 1 had more A1 or A2 types (p ≤ 0.001). Group 2 had greater active shoulder flexion at 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years (p ≤ 0.018) and external rotation (in adduction) at 6-months and 2-years (p ≤ 0.004) compared to Group 1, with higher ASES scores at 6-months and 2-years (p ≤ 0.026) (with small-to-medium effect sizes), and with more patients meeting or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at 2-years (p = 0.045) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) levels at 6-months, 1-year and 2-years (p ≤ 0.045). Scapular notching was identified in six of 53 (11.3%) Group 2 patients and in 32 of 180 (17.7%) Group 1 patients. Group 1 patients had more grade 2 or greater scapular notching grades compared to Group 2 (p = 0.04). Implant survival was comparable with Group 1 = eight of 180 (4.4%) and Group 2 = 1 of 53 (1.9%) of patients requiring removal for 95.6% and 98.1% implant survival, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Limited scapular notching and excellent implant survival was observed in both groups. Despite including individuals with more complex glenoid deficiency, patients receiving the lower size profile implants generally displayed better active shoulder mobility and perceived shoulder function compared to those who received standard implants. These patients also more frequently met or exceeded the MCID by 2-years post-RTSA and PASS levels by 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years post-RTSA, with lower scapular notching grades.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study.

Low complication rate following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at 90-days follow-up - A systematic review

IMPORTANCE

As reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become an increasingly common procedure, rates of post-operative complications leading to potential hospital readmission are of greater importance. No previous systematic reviews have focused exclusively on post-operative complications and mortality rates at 90 days post RTSA.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to review complication, readmission, and mortality rates within 90 days post RTSA.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Two independent reviewers performed a literature search using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Only studies reporting on outcomes of RTSA at 90-days follow-up specifically were considered for inclusion.

FINDINGS

Our search included 79,037 shoulders (62.1 ​% female) from a total of 15 studies with an average age of 72.4 ​± ​5.8 years. The overall 90-day re-admission rates were reported in nine studies as 6.1 ​% (4205/69,127) following RTSA. Additionally, a total of five studies reported the overall 90-day mortality rate as 1.1 ​% (19/1733). The overall pooled rate of medical complications was 3.9 ​% (2998/77,826) as reported in 13 studies, at 90-days post-RTSA, with the occurrence of anaemia being the most commonly reported outcomes as 2.9 ​% (1013/34,385) in six studies. The overall rate of surgical complications was 1.1 ​% reported in 13 studies (1327/77,826), with the pooled rate of surgical revisions of 1.5 ​% (607/40,563) at 90-days follow-up. A total of 8, 5, and 3 studies reported rates of dislocation, requirement for closed reduction and glenoid loosening as 0.9 ​% (344/37,995), 0.6 ​% (7/1180), and 0.3 ​% (30/9115) respectively at 90-days following RTSA.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study established that the overall rates of mortality and medical and surgical complications are low in the short-term following RTSA, with only 6 ​% of patients requiring re-admission in the first 90 days.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV - Systematic Review of all levels of evidence.

Subscapular sparing approach for total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Background

Total shoulder arthroplasty has been effective in treating primary glenohumeral arthritis surgically. However, the subscapularis (SSC) tendon must be released as part of the surgery's conventional approach, which could lead to postoperative problems and later tendon failure. Using a procedure that spares the tendon, Lafosse et al reported improved postoperative SSC performance. This meta-analysis will compare this approach to the standard one.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched till October 2022. The clinical outcomes consisted of the postoperative pain, adverse events, and range of motion.

Results

Only 3 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The subscapularis sparing approach tended to have better postoperative internal rotation (P = .06) and shoulder elevation (P = .1); however, the results were marginally statistically insignificant.

Conclusion

This is the first meta-analysis to compare the subscapularis sparing to the standard approach in total shoulder arthroplasty. Showing better postoperative range of motion (elevation and internal rotation), the SSC approach might be considered as a good substitute to the standard one. However, it is limited by the potentially limited exposure making it harder to use in muscular and obese patients. More randomized clinical trials are needed to reach more significant results and establish clearer indications of this approach.

Similar Value Demonstrated in the Short-Term Outcomes of Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to investigate the difference in value (benefit to cost ratio) of dermal allograft superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for the treatment of massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) without arthritis; to compare the patient populations selected for the operations and report pre- and postoperative functional data; and to understand other characteristics of the 2 operations, including operating time, use of institutional resources, and complications.

Methods

A retrospective, single-institution analysis during the study period 2014-2019 with MRCT treated with SCR or rTSA by 2 surgeons with complete institutional cost data and minimum 1-year clinical follow-up with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Value was defined as ΔASES/(total direct costs/$10,000).

Results

Thirty patients underwent rTSA and 126 patients SCR during the study period with significant differences noted in patient demographics and tear characteristics between the groups (patients who underwent rTSA were older, less male, had more pseudoparalysis, had greater Hamada and Goutallier scores, and had more proximal humeral migration). Value was 25 and 29 (ΔASES/$10,000) for rTSA and SCR, respectively (P = .7). The total costs of rTSA and SCR were $16,337 and $12,763, respectively (P = .7). Both groups experienced substantial improvements in ASES scores: 42 for rTSA vs 37 for SCR (P = .6). The operative time for SCR was much longer (204 vs 108 minutes, P < .001) but complication rate lower (3% vs 13%, P = .02) versus rTSA.

Conclusions

In a single institutional analysis of the treatment of MRCT without arthritis, rTSA and SCR demonstrated similar value; however, the value calculation is highly dependent on institution specific variables and duration of follow-up. The operating surgeons demonstrated different indications in selecting patients for each operation. rTSA had an advantage over SCR in shorter operative time, whereas SCR demonstrated a lower complication rate. Both SCR and rTSA are demonstrated to be effective treatments for MRCT at short-term follow-up.

Level of Evidence

III, retrospective comparative study.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty pain and function: new perspectives from a 10-year multicenter study at the 7-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can decrease shoulder pain and improve function. However, results reportedly deteriorate as patients approach mid-term follow-up and little is known about how this impacts physical health-related quality of life (PHRQOL) and mental health-related quality of life (MHRQOL). The study hypothesis was that shoulder function, pain, and medication use for pain would influence PHRQOL and MHRQOL.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study involving subjects from 6 orthopedic clinics and 12 fellowship-trained surgeons evaluated the influence of RTSA on PHRQOL, MHRQOL, shoulder function, pain, instability, and medication use over the initial 7 years of a 10-year study, and device survivorship and revision rates. Clinical examination, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Short Form (SF)-12 PHRQOL and MHRQOL assessments, the single assessment numeric shoulder function evaluation (SANE), visual analog scale (VAS) shoulder pain and instability scores, shoulder pain, medication use for pain, surgery satisfaction, survivorship and revision rate data were collected pre-RTSA, and at 6-week, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 7-year follow-ups.

RESULTS

Two hundred participants (108 female) of 69 ± 8.3 years of age, with gross rotator cuff deficiency (poor tissue quality or impaired dynamic stability) (n = 92), glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis (n = 88), failed primary total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 8), non-united humeral head fracture (n = 6) or 3-4 section comminuted humeral head fracture (n = 6) underwent pre-RTSA evaluation. Device survivorship was 94%. Friedman two-way ANOVA and Wilcoxon test pairwise comparisons revealed that compared to pre-RTSA, median active shoulder flexion (+ 25°) and external rotation (+ 10°) mobility improved by 6 months (p < 0.0001) and remained improved. Shoulder flexion (+ 1 grade), abduction, external rotation (+ 0.5 grade), and internal rotation strength (+ 1 grade) also improved by 6 months (p < 0.0001) and remained improved. ASES (+ 26.8), SANE (+ 17.5) and VAS pain (- 5.7) scores improved by 6 weeks (p < 0.0001) and remained improved, as medication use for shoulder pain decreased (- 24.6%) (p < 0.0001). SF-12 PHRQOL scores improved by 6 months (+ 11.5) and remained improved (p < 0.0001). Significant Spearman Rho correlations were observed between shoulder function (ASES or SANE) and SF-12 PHRQOL (r ≥ 0.52) and MHRQOL (r ≥ 0.20) scores (p < 0.0001) supporting the relationship between shoulder function and quality of life. Trend analysis revealed changing shoulder function, pain, and PHRQOL relationships between 2 and 3 years, and 5 and 7 years post-RTSA (Chi-Square, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Excellent device survival and good-to-excellent perceived shoulder function, and PHRQOL improvements were observed. Secondary objectives of improved shoulder mobility, strength, pain and instability were also achieved. In contrast to previous reports, subjects did not display shoulder mobility or perceived function deterioration by the 7-year follow-up. Following chronic pain relief at 6 weeks post-RTSA, subjects appear to balance PHRQOL and shoulder pain relationships at the 6-month and 1-year post-RTSA follow-ups. Careful evaluation at this time may help patients with higher pain levels and lower function expectations reverse these trends, or patients with lower pain levels and higher function expectations to optimize RTSA use and longevity.

Prevalence of Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States and the Increasing Burden of Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty

Existing data on the epidemiology of shoulder arthroplasty are limited to future projections of incidence. However, the prevalence of shoulder arthroplasty (the number of individuals with a shoulder arthroplasty alive at a certain time and its implications for the burden of revision procedures) remains undetermined for the United States. Hence, the purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States.

Cost-effectiveness analyses in shoulder arthroplasty: a critical review using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to identify cost-analysis studies pertaining to shoulder arthroplasty, provide a comprehensive review of published studies, and critically evaluate the quality of the available literature using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify cost analyses examining shoulder arthroplasty. The inclusion criteria included studies pertaining to either shoulder hemiarthroplasty (HA), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), or reverse TSA. Articles were excluded based on the following: nonoperative studies, nonclinical studies, studies not based in the United States, and studies in which no cost analysis was performed. The quality of studies was assessed using the QHES instrument. One-sided Fisher exact testing was performed to identify predictors of both low-quality (ie, QHES score < 25th percentile) and high-quality (ie, QHES score > 75th percentile) cost analyses based on items within the QHES checklist.

RESULTS

Of the 196 studies screened, 9 were included. Seven studies conducted cost analyses comparing reverse TSA vs. arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, HA, or total hip arthroplasty, and 2 studies examined TSA vs. HA for primary glenohumeral arthritis. The average QHES score among all studies was 86.22 ± 13.39 points. Failure to include an annual cost discounting rate was associated with a low-quality QHES score (P = .03). In addition, including a discussion of the magnitude and direction of potential biases was associated with a high-quality score (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder arthroplasty is a cost-effective procedure when used to treat a multitude of shoulder pathologies. The overall quality of cost analysis in shoulder arthroplasty is relatively good, with an average QHES score of 86.22 points. Studies failing to include an annual cost discounting rate are more likely to score below the 25th percentile, whereas those including a discussion of the magnitude and direction of potential biases are more likely to achieve a score in excess of the 75th percentile.

Posterior latissimus dorsi transfer for massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: does it work in the elderly population? A comparative study between 2 age groups (≤55 vs. ≥75 years old)

HYPOTHESIS AND/OR BACKGROUND

Management of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (RCTs) presents a significant challenge to shoulder surgeons. Previous studies on latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) have demonstrated good to excellent outcomes in younger patients, but this indication is debatable in the elderly. The main objective of this study was to compare the results of LDT in a group of patients aged ≤55 years vs. one of patients aged ≥75 years. We hypothesized that LDT could give equally good results in the elderly as in the younger population.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2017, a total of 153 patients who underwent LDT either for irreparable posterosuperior RCT or for failed prior repair were enrolled. All LDTs were performed by a single surgeon, were arthroscopically assisted, and fixed onto the humeral head with 2 anchors. A retrospective comparative clinical study was conducted. Patients with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were divided into 2 groups: group A (≤55 years old at surgery) and group B (≥75 years old at surgery). The age-adjusted Constant-Murley score (aCMS), Subjective Score Value (SSV), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Activities of Daily Living requiring active External Rotation (ADLER) score, visual analog scale for pain (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, patient's satisfaction, and rate of LD tendon rupture at last follow-up were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients met inclusion criteria. Four in 66 patients (6%) were lost to follow-up. There were 31 patients in group A and 31 patients in group B. The mean age was 52 and 77 years for the respective groups. Preoperatively, the 2 groups were comparable with respect to other characteristics like the mean number of ruptured tendons, mean preoperative Hamada stage, mean SST, and mean aCMS. The mean follow-up was 33 and 31 months, respectively. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the scores evaluated between groups A and B with SSV (61 vs. 66.7 points), ADLER (23 vs. 26.4 points), VAS (2.8 vs. 2.2 points), and ASES (64.4 vs. 72.4 points), respectively, except for the aCMS (75 vs. 96.3; ±001) and the SST (6.2 vs. 8.3; P < .001). Patient's satisfaction was not significantly different in both groups (81% of either satisfied or very satisfied patients in both groups). The rate of LD tendon rupture was higher in group A: 10 (33%) vs. 8 (26%).

CONCLUSION

Posterior transfer of latissimus dorsi tendon could be an effective surgical option for the treatment of massive irreparable posterosuperior cuff tears in patients ≥75 years of age.

Cost effectiveness analyses of total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis: A PRISMA systematic review

BACKGROUND

Healthcare services are facing economic constraints globally with an increasingly elderly population, and greater burdens of osteoarthritis. Because of the chronic nature of osteoarthritis and the costs associated with surgery, arthroplasty is seen as potentially cost saving. There have been no systematic reviews conducted on cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) studies of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the management of osteoarthritis. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate CEAs conducted on THA for osteoarthritis to determine if THA is a cost-effective intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using five databases to identify all clinical CEAs of THA for osteoarthritis conducted after 1 January 1997. Twenty-eight studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The Quality of Health Economic Analysis (QHES) checklist was employed to assess the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

The average QHES score was 86 indicating high quality studies. All studies reviewed concluded that THA was a cost-effective intervention. In younger patients, cementless THA and ceramic on polyethylene implants were found to be most cost effective. Hybrid THA and metal on polyethylene implants had the greatest cost utility in older patients. In patients with acetabular defects, cemented cup with impaction bone grafting was most cost effective, while dual mobility THA was most cost effective in patients with high risk of dislocation.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that THA is a cost-effective treatment for hip osteoarthritis. These findings should be implemented into clinical practice to improve cost utility in health services across the world.

Applied anatomical study on suprascapular nerve protection in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the three-dimensional (3D) anatomical relationship between the suprascapular nerve and scapula, and the method of protecting the suprascapular nerve in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) METHODS: In the present study, 12 fresh adult cadaver shoulder specimens were dissected. X-ray and computed tomography (CT) were used to investigate the 3D scapular and suprascapular nerve images.

RESULTS

The results revealed that the best fitting baseplate diameter was 24.73 ± 1.56 mm. Furthermore, the baseplate diameter correlated with the glenoid cavity width. After the osteotomy, a simulated screw placement on the baseplate was performed. The dangerous area for the posterior screw placement was at the angle between the upper edge and transverse axis exceeding 38° and between the lower edge and transverse axis exceeding 76°. The distance between the nearest point of the nerve and osteotomy plane was 15.38 ± 2.02 mm, and the angle between the projection point of the nearest point and transverse axis was 27.33 ± 7.96°, which was the dangerous area for retractor placement. The suitable angle between the superior screw and longitudinal axis was 21.67 ± 13.27°, and the suitable superior screw length was 34.66 ± 2.41 mm.

CONCLUSION

In RTSA, the baseplate size correlates with the glenoid cavity width. The relationship between the screw and suprascapular nerve and retractor placement position should be carefully considered to avoid damaging the suprascapular nerve.

Bundled Payment Plans Are Associated With Notable Cost Savings for Ambulatory Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Bundling of services, typically into a 90-day episode of care, is intended to facilitate cost reduction. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a private insurance bundling program on the costs of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) at a freestanding ambulatory surgery center.

METHODS

A cost minimization analysis was done of patients who had anatomic TSA by a single surgeon at a single freestanding ambulatory surgery center, including line-by-line comparisons of demographic and comorbidity factors for all patients treated within the 90-day episode of care.

RESULTS

Seventy-six primary anatomic TSAs were included, 39 in the bundled group and 37 outside of the program. The bundled group was on average older (58 years) than the unbundled group (54 years, P = 0.021), but the groups were otherwise similar in demographics. The average total implant charges were significantly less for the bundled group ($24,822.43 versus $28,405.51, P = 0.014). Average total surgery supply charges and anesthesia supply charges were similar (P > 0.05). Mean total outpatient surgical day charges (implants, surgical, and anesthesia equipment) were significantly less for the bundled group ($29,782.43 versus $33,238.68, P = 0.022), as were average operating room staffing costs ($135.37 versus $162.55, P = 0.015). During the 90-day postoperative period, charges were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary anatomic TSA using a bundled care program in an outpatient setting coincides with markedly lower charges. The primary driver of this reduction is implant pricing, which is negotiated as part of the bundle. Surgeons must carefully analyze their unique practices in the changing economic health care environment when creating an outpatient TSA and/or bundling program.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III economic analysis.

Cost Analysis in Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cost analysis studies in medicine were uncommon in the past, but with the rising importance of financial considerations, it has become increasingly important to use available resources most efficiently.

PURPOSE

To analyze the current state of cost-effectiveness analyses in shoulder surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review of the current literature was performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All full economic analyses published since January 1, 2010 and including the terms "cost analysis" and "shoulder" were checked for usability. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence and established health economic criteria (Quality of Health Economic Studies [QHES] instrument).

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Compared with older studies, recent studies were of better quality: one level 1 study and eight level 2 studies were included. The mean QHES score was 87 of 100. The thematic focus of most studies (n = 13) was rotator cuff tears, with the main findings as follows: (1) magnetic resonance imaging is a cost-effective imaging strategy, (2) primary (arthroscopic) rotator cuff repair (RCR) with conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in case of failure is the most cost-effective strategy, (3) the platelet-rich plasma augmentation of RCR seems not to be cost-effective, and (4) the cost-effectiveness of double-row RCR remains unclear. Other studies included shoulder instability (n = 3), glenohumeral osteoarthritis (n = 3), proximal humeral fractures (n = 4), subacromial impingement (n = 4), and other shoulder conditions (n = 7).

CONCLUSION

Compared with prior studies, the quality of recently available studies has improved significantly. Current studies could help decision makers to appropriately and adequately allocate resources. The optimal use of financial resources will be of increasing importance to improve medical care for patients. However, further studies are still necessary.

Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a procedure that has been increasingly utilized since its inception over 20 years ago. The purpose of this review is to present the most up to date practice and advances to the RTSA literature from the last 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature on RTSA has focused on identifying complications, maximizing outcomes, and determining its cost-effectiveness. RTSA has become a valuable tool in the treatment of various shoulder pathologies from fractures to massive-irreparable rotator cuff tears. Maximizing outcomes, proper patient counseling, and limiting complications are vital to a successful procedure. RTSA can be a difficult procedure; however, when utilized appropriately, it can be an invaluable tool in the orthopedic surgeon's armament. Recent evidence suggests, more and more, that RTSA not only provides value to the patient, but it is also cost-effective.

Numerical Study of the Biomechanical Behaviour of the Different Implantation Methods of the Reverse Shoulder Replacement

Despite the widespread use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, there is still a problem of conflict between the polyethylene cup of the prosthesis and the scapula, which over time causes the phenomenon of notching. In order to circumvent this problem correctly, several innovations have been proposed regard to the implementation method. In this context, the aim of this work is to study the biomechanical behavior of new implantation methods using different glenoid configurations in order to avoid the notching phenomenon between the cup and the scapula. The study was performed using virtual prototypes of the shoulder prosthesis assembly. Using CT scan images, three-dimensional models of shoulder bones were reconstructed. The implantation of the prosthesis in the three-dimensional model was performed in collaboration with an experienced surgeon from the Caduceus Clinic (Oran, Algeria). The numerical models were imported to finite element calculation software. After the validation of the numerical model using the literature results, we assessed the biomechanical behavior of four implantation methods under the same boundary conditions and abduction movements. From the obtained results, it was found that among the proposed methods, the BIO-SR lateralization method offers significant biomechanical advantages in terms of the forces applied to the glenoid during the abduction movement.

Acromial spine fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) accounts for nearly one-third of shoulder arthroplasty utilization nationally. The complication rate has increased concurrently. Consensus is lacking regarding the incidence, etiology, and treatment of acromial or scapular spine fractures after RSA. The purpose of our study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to analyze the occurrence and outcomes of this complication.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were queried in late 2017 for combinations of the words "acromial," "fracture," "reverse," "shoulder," and "arthroplasty." We included all studies that contained a clearly defined performance of RSA, acromial fracture(s) noted, and treatment (if any) and outcomes of treatment. The initial search yielded 50 studies; 32 met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Among 3838 RSAs, 159 acromial fractures were reported, for an overall incidence of 4.14%; the mean time to diagnosis from surgery was 9 months (range, 1.3-24 months). Treatments included nonoperative treatment in a sling or abduction brace in 139 cases and open reduction-internal fixation in 20. Regardless of treatment, patients reported inferior function after fracture compared with initially after RSA. Forward flexion was 95° (range, 30°-110°), abduction was 76° (range, 30°-180°), the Constant score was 63 (range, 59-67.5), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 57 (range, 7-83); all values were reduced compared with patients without fractures.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests the occurrence of acromial fractures after RSA is a common event, with a rate of over 4%. These fractures correlate with worse postoperative outcomes regardless of treatment method; open reduction-internal fixation was not shown to be clinically superior despite a limited complication rate. Additional high-quality studies addressing acromial spine fracture after RSA are needed.

Selection, implementation, and interpretation of patient-centered shoulder and elbow outcomes

The movement toward a value-based health care market requires comparison of physicians, hospitals, and health systems. Traditionally, process-based measures such as infection and readmission rates have been used. However, these events are uncommon in shoulder and elbow surgery, thus limiting their utility. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a promising measure of quality and have been proposed as a potential metric to compare surgeon performance. However, there are over 25 different PROs for shoulder and elbow conditions. Therefore, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Value Committee was established to recommend shoulder and elbow PROs in an effort to align their implementation for quality assessment. The committee developed criteria for assessing the outcome measures including that each measure should be patient reported, not requiring clinician input; have published validation and psychometrics; and be standardized and demonstrate ease of use for the patient and clinician. Two sets were suggested: one set for clinical implementation and a more robust set for research purposes. The final recommendation was that all patients should complete the Veterans Rand 12 for general health and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation for the specified body region. For patients with shoulder complaints, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was recommended, and for those with elbow complaints, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was recommended. More robust disease-specific measures were provided for research purposes. Continued efforts should be made to align these measures across orthopedics to facilitate use of patient outcome measures as a component of value-based health care assessment.

Glenoid morphology and the safe zone for protecting the suprascapular nerve during baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate glenoid morphology and define the safe zone for protecting the suprascapular nerve baseplate screw during baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in a Chinese population.

METHODS

Shoulder computed tomography (CT) scans from 56 subjects were retrospectively reviewed. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was performed using Mimics software, and corresponding bony references were used to evaluate glenoid morphology. To standardize evaluation, the coronal scapular plane was defined. Safe fixation distances and screw placements were investigated by constructing a simulated cutting plane of the baseplate during RSA.

RESULTS

Mean glenoid height was 35.83 ± 2.95 mm, and width was 27.32 ± 2.78 mm, with significant sexual dimorphism (p < 0.01). According to the cutting plane morphology, the average baseplate radius was 13.84 ± 1.34 mm. The distances from the suprascapular notch and from two bony reference points at the base of the scapular spine to the cutting plane were 30.27 ± 2.77 mm, 18.39 ± 1.67 mm and 16.52 ± 1.52 mm, respectively, with a gender-related difference. Based on the clock face indication system, the danger zone caused by the suprascapular nerve projection was oriented between the two o'clock and eight o'clock positions in reference to the right shoulder.

CONCLUSIONS

Glenoid size and the safe zone for screw fixation during RSA were characterized in a Chinese population. Careful consideration of baseplate fixation and avoidance of suprascapular nerve injury are important for improved clinical outcome.

Subscapularis- and deltoid-sparing vs traditional deltopectoral approach in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective case-control study

Background

With the growth of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), it is becoming increasingly necessary to establish the most cost-effective methods for the procedure. The surgical approach is one factor that may influence the cost and outcome of RSA. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of a subscapularis- and deltoid-sparing (SSCS) approach to a traditional deltopectoral (TDP) approach for RSA. The hypothesis was that the SSCS approach would be associated with decreased length of stay (LOS), equal complication rate, and better short-term outcomes compared to the TDP approach.

Methods

A prospective evaluation was performed on patients undergoing RSA over a 2-year period. A deltopectoral incision was used followed by either an SSCS approach or a traditional tenotomy of the subscapularis (TDP). LOS, adverse events, physical therapy utilization, and patient satisfaction were collected in the 12 months following RSA.

Results

LOS was shorter with the SSCS approach compared to the TDP approach (from 8.2 ± 6.4 days to 15.2 ± 11.9 days; P = 0.04). At 3 months postoperative, the single assessment numeric evaluation score (80 ± 11% vs 70 ± 6%; P = 0.04) and active elevation (130 ± 22° vs 109 ± 24°; P = 0.01) were higher in the SSCS group. The SSCS approach resulted in a net cost savings of $5900 per patient. Postoperative physical therapy, pain levels, and patient satisfaction were comparable in both groups. No immediate intraoperative complications were noted.

Conclusion

Using a SSCS approach is an option for patients requiring RSA. Overall LOS is minimized compared to a TDP approach with subscapularis tenotomy. The SSCS approach may provide substantial healthcare cost savings, without increasing complication rate or decreasing patient satisfaction.