Reduction in erythropoietin doses by the use of chronic intravenous iron supplementation in iron-replete hemodialysis patients

The Switch from Ferric Gluconate to Ferric Carboxymaltose in Hemodialysis Patients Acts on Iron Metabolism, Erythropoietin, and Costs: A Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: Iron deficiency and anemia characterize patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD). Available intravenous iron agents, such as ferric gluconate (FG) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), vary in dosing regimens and safety profiles. The aim of the present study was to analyze the modification of the iron status, the correction of anemia, and the economic implications after the shift from FG to FCM therapy in chronic HD patients. We evaluated, during the study, the variations in iron metabolism, assessing ferritin and transferrin saturation, erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA) doses and the number of administrations, the effects on anemic status, and consequent costs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed with a follow-up period of 24 months, enrolling forty-two HD patients. The enrolment phase started in January 2015, when patients were treated with iv FG, and continued until December 2015, when FG was discontinued, and, after a wash-out period, the same patients were treated with FCM. Results: The iron switch reduced the administered dose of ESA by 1610.500 UI (31% of reduction; p < 0.001) during the entire study period and reduced the erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) (10.1 ± 0.4 vs. 14.8 ± 0.5; p < 0.0001). The FCM group had the highest percentage of patients who did not require ESA treatment during the study period. The FCM patients were characterized by higher levels of iron (p = 0.04), ferritin (p < 0.001), and TSAT levels (p < 0.001) compared to the FG patients. The annual cost during FG infusion was estimated at EUR 105,390.2, while one year of treatment with FCM had a total cost of EUR 84,180.7 (a difference of EUR 21,209.51 (20%), saving EUR 42.1 per patient/month (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: FCM was a more effective treatment option than FG, reducing ESA dose requirements, increasing Hb levels, and improving iron status. The reduced ESA doses and the decreased number of patients needing ESA were the main factors for reducing overall costs.

Potential effective treatment of shortening continuous erythropoietin receptor activator treatment interval combined with iron supplementation in hemodialysis patients

Our previous randomized controlled trial comparing the total dose of weekly versus biweekly continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) therapy to maintain optimal hemoglobin (Hb) levels showed no significant differences between the two therapies. This post-hoc analysis assessed whether the total dose of weekly versus biweekly CERA therapy to maintain Hb levels among HD patients differed among groups with or without iron supplementation. Of 107 patients, 40 received intravenous iron supplementation due to iron deficiency (iron group) and 67 did not (non-iron group). In the iron group, the weekly therapy tended to require a lower total CERA dose compared with the biweekly therapy (274 ± 274 vs 381 ± 223 μg/12 weeks, P = 0.051). Changes in circulating hepcidin levels, a negative regulator of intestinal iron uptake, after 2 weeks of CERA treatment were significantly lower in the weekly therapy compared with the biweekly therapy (-4.2 ± 6.3 vs 11.1 ± 7.3 ng/mL, P = 0.015). In the non-iron group, there were no significant differences in total CERA dose or changes in hepcidin levels between the two therapies. Shortening the CERA treatment interval combined with iron supplementation may lead to the more efficient treatment of HD patients with iron deficiency.

Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency anemia in dialysis patients: Effect of a new protocol adopted for a hemodialysis limited assistance center

Iron and erythropoietin deficiencies are determinants of anemia in chronic kidney disease. In hemodialysis (HD) patients, intravenous (IV) iron is associated with a greater hemoglobin (Hb) production and better erythropoietin response but may be associated to hypersensitivity reaction. After the 2013 European Medicines Agency report regarding early detection/management of iron allergic reactions, IV iron administration dramatically reduced in Italian Hemodialysis-Limited-Assistance-Centre (HD-CAL) where a physician is present only once a week. Objective of the study was providing an effective and secure IV iron administration protocol for HD-CAL patients. IV ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) administration was more effective and better tolerated than sodium ferric gluconate for iron deficiency correction and resolution of anemia in 24 patients undergoing HD in our HD-CAL. Six months of FCM IV treatment once a week increased ferritin and Hb compared to sodium ferric gluconate once a week leading to decreased erythropoietin consumption from 24 000 to 15 000 U/patient/week with an erythropoietin annual expense reduction. No blood transfusions, gastrointestinal intolerance or other adverse effects were reported. The FCM IV administration protocol for our HD-CAL patients was safe and no adverse events were reported, resulting in significantly increased ferritin, transferrin saturation, and Hb levels, reduction of erythropoietin requirements, and consequently reduction of erythropoietin expenses.

Diagnosis of iron deficiency in hemodialysis patients: Usefulness of measuring reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent

The evaluation of iron status in dialysis patients provides information essential to the planning of adequate recombinant human erythropoietin treatment. To diagnose iron deficiency in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD), reticulocyte hemoglobin content and percentage of hypochromic red cells are incorporated into the European best practice guidelines on anemia management in chronic kidney disease (CKD), the mean reticulocyte hemoglobin content (Ret-HE) was proposed as alternatives to standard biochemical tests. Reticulocyte hemoglobin content and percentage of hypochromic red cells are incorporated into the European best practice guidelines on anemia management in CKD. Our aim was to assess the value of Ret-HE parameter, in terms of the sensitivity and specificity for detecting iron deficiency, in HD patients. We studied 50 patients undergoing HD three times weekly , to clarify the accuracy of Ret-HE in diagnosing iron deficiency in dialysis patients, we initially compared Ret-HE with such iron parameters as serum ferritin levels, transferrin saturation, and hypochromic red blood cell (Hypo%) which has been established as indicators of functional iron deficiency. Ret-HE mean value in anemic patients was (25.84 ± 4.23 pg) and had good correlation (P <0.001) between Ret-HE, serum iron, ferritin, transferrin, and transferin saturation in dialysis patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed, values of the area was 0.887, and at a cutoff value of 27.0 pg, a sensitivity of 90.4% and a specificity of 80.8% were achieved. The newly proposed Ret-HE can provide clinicians with information equivalent to iron deficiency anemia markers. Ret-HE is a new parameter that is easily measurable is suggested as reliable parameters for the study of erythropoiesis status in HD patients.

Intravenous iron therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease: recent evidence and future directions

Current recommendations for the use of intravenous iron therapy in the management of anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are based on limited clinical evidence. Since the publication of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Anaemia in Chronic Kidney Disease in 2012, a number of randomized clinical trials [notably, the Ferinject Assessment in Patients with Iron Deficiency Anaemia (FIND-CKD) and Randomized Trial to Evaluate IV and Oral Iron in Chronic Kidney Disease (REVOKE) trials] and observational studies have been completed, and a further large clinical trial—Proactive IV Iron Therapy in Dialysis Patients (PIVOTAL)—is currently underway. In this article, the implications of the findings from these recent studies are discussed and the critical evidence gaps that remain to be addressed are highlighted.

Evaluating the effectiveness of IV iron dosing for anemia management in common clinical practice: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

Background

Anemia management protocols in hemodialysis (HD) units differ conspicuously regarding optimal intravenous (IV) iron dosing; consequently, patients receive markedly different cumulative exposures to IV iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Complementary to IV iron safety studies, our goal was to gain insight into optimal IV iron dosing by estimating the effects of IV iron doses on Hgb, TSAT, ferritin, and ESA dose in common clinical practice.

Methods

9,471 HD patients (11 countries, 2009-2011) in the DOPPS, a prospective cohort study, were analyzed. Associations of IV iron dose (3-month average, categorized as 0, <300, ≥300 mg/month) with 3-month change in Hgb, TSAT, ferritin, and ESA dose were evaluated using adjusted GEE models.

Results

Relative change: Monotonically positive associations between IV iron dose and Hgb, TSAT, and ferritin change, and inverse associations with ESA dose change, were observed across multiple strata of prior Hgb, TSAT, and ferritin levels. Absolute change: TSAT, ferritin, and ESA dose changes were nearest zero with IV iron <300 mg/month, rather than 0 mg/month or ≥300 mg/month by maintenance or replacement dosing. Findings were robust to numerous sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Though residual confounding cannot be ruled out in this observational study, findings suggest that IV iron dosing <300 mg/month, as commonly seen with maintenance dosing of 100-200 mg/month, may be a more effective approach to support Hgb than the higher IV iron doses (300-400 mg/month) often given in many European and North American hemodialysis clinics. Alongside studies supporting the safety of IV iron in 100-200 mg/month dose range, these findings help guide the rational dosing of IV iron in anemia management protocols for everyday hemodialysis practice.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-017-0745-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Switching patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease from oral iron to intravenous ferric carboxymaltose: effects on erythropoiesis-stimulating agent requirements, costs, hemoglobin and iron status

Background

Patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) often receive an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) and oral iron treatment. This study evaluated whether a switch from oral iron to intravenous ferric carboxymaltose can reduce ESA requirements and improve iron status and hemoglobin in patients with ND-CKD.

Methods

This prospective, single arm and single-center study included adult patients with ND-CKD (creatinine clearance ≤40 mL/min), hemoglobin 11–12 g/dL and iron deficiency (ferritin <100 μg/L or transferrin saturation <20%), who were regularly treated with oral iron and ESA during 6 months prior to inclusion. Study patients received an intravenous ferric carboxymaltose dose of 1,000 mg iron, followed by a 6-months ESA/ ferric carboxymaltose maintenance regimen (target: hemoglobin 12 g/dL, transferrin saturation >20%). Outcome measures were ESA dose requirements during the observation period after initial ferric carboxymaltose treatment (primary endpoint); number of hospitalizations and transfusions, renal function before and after ferric carboxymaltose administration, number of adverse reactions (secondary endpoints). Hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, ferritin and transferrin saturation were measured monthly from baseline until end of study. Creatinine clearance, proteinuria, C-reactive protein, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase bimonthly from baseline until end of study.

Results

Thirty patients were enrolled (age 70.1±11.4 years; mean±SD). Mean ESA consumption was significantly reduced by 83.2±10.9% (from 41,839±3,668 IU/patient to 6,879±4,271 IU/patient; p<0.01). Hemoglobin increased by 0.7±0.3 g/dL, ferritin by 196.0±38.7 μg/L and transferrin saturation by 5.3±2.9% (month 6 vs. baseline; all p<0.01). No ferric carboxymaltose-related adverse events were reported and no patient withdrew or required transfusions during the study.

Conclusion

Among patients with ND-CKD and stable normal or borderline hemoglobin, switching from oral iron to intravenous ferric carboxymaltose was associated with significant improvements in hematological and iron parameters and a significant reduction in ESA dose requirements in this single-center pilot study.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02232906

Intravenous iron exposure and mortality in patients on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Clinical trials assessing effects of larger cumulative iron exposure with outcomes are lacking, and observational studies have been limited by assessment of short-term exposure only and/or failure to assess cause-specific mortality. The associations between short- and long-term iron exposure on all-cause and cause-specific mortality were examined.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The study included 14,078 United States patients on dialysis initiating dialysis between 2003 and 2008. Intravenous iron dose accumulations over 1-, 3-, and 6-month rolling windows were related to all-cause, cardiovascular, and infection-related mortality in Cox proportional hazards models that used marginal structural modeling to control for time-dependent confounding.

RESULTS

Patients in the 1-month model cohort (n=14,078) were followed a median of 19 months, during which there were 27.6% all-cause deaths, 13.5% cardiovascular deaths, and 3% infection-related deaths. A reduced risk of all-cause mortality with receipt of >150-350 (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.95) or >350 mg (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.99) intravenous iron compared with >0-150 mg over 1 month was observed. There was no relation of 1-month intravenous iron dose with cardiovascular or infection-related mortality and no relation of 3- or 6-month cumulative intravenous iron dose with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. There was a nonstatistically significant increase in infection-related mortality with receipt of >1050 mg intravenous iron in 3 months (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 3.28) and >2100 mg in 6 months (hazard ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 3.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients on incident dialysis, receipt of ≤ 1050 mg intravenous iron in 3 months or 2100 mg in 6 months was not associated with all-cause, cardiovascular, or infection-related mortality. However, nonstatistically significant findings suggested the possibility of infection-related mortality with receipt of >1050 mg in 3 months or >2100 mg in 6 months. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the safety of exposure to greater cumulative intravenous iron doses.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron therapy for functional iron deficiency anemia in hemodialysis patients: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies on benefits of intravenous iron therapy among hemodialysis patients with functional iron deficiency anemia have shown conflicting results. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous iron in this subset of patients.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (through December 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov for single-arm studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) that examined the effect of intravenous iron for functional iron deficiency anemia in hemodialysis patients on anemia parameters and markers of oxidative stress and inflammation. Studies of absolute iron deficiency were excluded. Random-effect model meta-analyses were used to compute changes in outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

We identified 34 studies (2,658 patients), representing 24 single-arm studies, and 10 parallel-arm RCT. In the analyses of the study arms, intravenous iron therapy resulted in a significant increase in hemoglobin, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation rate, serum iron, reticulocyte hemoglobin content as well as a significant decrease in the percentage of hypochromic erythrocytes and erythropoietin dose. There were significant increases in plasma malonyldialdehyde level and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, and a decrease in neutrophil respiratory burst. The analyses of the RCT revealed less robust net changes in these parameters, and there was no increased risk of adverse events including infections, cardiac events and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous iron therapy for functional iron deficiency anemia in hemodialysis patients improves anemia parameters but exerts some effects on markers of oxidative stress that are of unclear clinical significance. The long-term safety and efficacy of this treatment strategy requires further study.

Iron indices and survival in maintenance hemodialysis patients with and without polycystic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Anemia is less prominent in patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD). Such iron indices as ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) values are used to guide management of anemia in individuals on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). Optimal levels of correction of anemia and optimal levels of TSAT and ferritin are unclear in chronic kidney disease patients and have not been studied specifically in PKD.

METHODS

We studied 2969 MHD patients with and 128 054 patients without PKD from 580 outpatient hemodialysis facilities between July 2001 and June 2006. Using baseline, time-dependent and time-averaged values with unadjusted and multivariable adjusted analysis models, the survival predictabilities of TSAT and ferritin were studied.

RESULTS

PKD patients were 58 ± 13 years old and included 46% women, whereas non-PKD patients were 62 ± 15 years old and 45% women. In both PKD and non-PKD patients, a time-averaged TSAT between 30 and 40% was associated with the lowest mortality. Time-averaged ferritin between 100 and <800 ng/mL was associated with the lowest mortality in PKD patients, although this range was 500 to <800 ng/mL in non-PKD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In MHD patients with and without PKD, there was a U-shaped relationship between the average TSAT and mortality, and a TSAT of 30-40% was associated with the best survival. However, an average ferritin of 100-800 ng/mL was associated with the best survival in PKD patients, whereas that of non-PKD patients was 500-800 ng/mL. Further studies in PKD and non-PKD patients are necessary to determine whether or not therapeutic attempts to keep TSAT and ferritin levels in these ranges will improve survival.

[Intravenous iron during predialysis period improves anemia management and cardiovascular parameters in incident hemodialysis patients]

Individualized use of iron therapy (IT) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) may effectively correct anemia and its symptoms in CKD patients (Pts). The aim of this retrospective study was to precise the anemia management (AM) in incident HD Pts, and to compare Pts treated by intravenous (i.v.) IT and ESA during predialysis to those treated by oral IT and ESA on AM and cardiovascular parameters during the first year of HD. One hundred and two Pts performed their first dialysis in the unit, mean age 58.5 (15.9) years, 70% males, 27% diabetes. Ninety Pts started with a native arteriovenous fistula. Charlson comorbidity index was 7.3 (3.5). Mortality rate was 3% at one year. Hb level was at start 10.6 (1.7) and at one year 11.7 (1.1) g/dL (P<0.0001). DA injected every 2weeks was at the beginning at 107 (56) μg and then at 61 (46) (P<0.0001). i.v. IT injected every week was at the dosage of 87 (23) mg and then at 57 (40mg) per injection (P<0.001). Out of 102 Pts, 33 received i.v. IT during predialysis. These Pts started dialysis with a better Hb level: 11.1 (1.3) versus 10.4 (1.55) g/dL (P<0.01), had a TSAT at 50.0 (19.2) versus 30.1 (15.2) % (P<0.001), received less ESA 0.58 (0.28) versus 0.82 (0.37) μg/kg per week (P<0.01). More important were the changes on the cardiovascular functions: left ventricular mass at 116 (34) versus 134 (39) g/m(2) (P<0.02), left ventricular ejection fraction at 64.7 (4.4) versus 61.4 (8.7) % (P<0.02) and mean arterial pressure at 104.7 (80) versus 109 (13.2) mmHg (P<0.02). These Pts were also less hospitalized. This study revealed the importance of i.v. IT during predialysis care not only on AM but also on cardiovascular status in HD Pts starting dialysis.

A hepcidin lowering agent mobilizes iron for incorporation into red blood cells in an adenine-induced kidney disease model of anemia in rats

BACKGROUND

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) that negatively impacts the quality of life and is associated with numerous adverse outcomes. Excess levels of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin are thought to contribute to anemia in CKD patients by decreasing iron availability from the diet and from body stores. Adenine treatment in rats has been proposed as an animal model of anemia of CKD with high hepcidin levels that mirrors the condition in human patients.

METHODS

We developed a modified adenine-induced kidney disease model with a higher survival rate than previously reported models, while maintaining persistent kidney disease and anemia. We then tested whether the small molecule bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) inhibitor LDN-193189, which was previously shown to lower hepcidin levels in rodents, mobilized iron into the plasma and improved iron-restricted erythropoiesis in this model.

RESULTS

Adenine-treated rats exhibited increased hepatic hepcidin mRNA, decreased serum iron, increased spleen iron content, low hemoglobin (Hb) and inappropriately low erythropoietin (EPO) levels relative to the degree of anemia. LDN-193189 administration to adenine-treated rats lowered hepatic hepcidin mRNA, mobilized stored iron into plasma and increased Hb content of reticulocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that hepcidin lowering agents may provide a new therapeutic strategy to improve iron availability for erythropoiesis in CKD.

Utilization Patterns of IV Iron and Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents in Anemic Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Multihospital Study

Intravenous (IV) iron and Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs) are recommended for anemia management in chronic kidney disease (CKD). This retrospective cohort study analyzed utilization patterns of IV iron and ESA in patients over 18 years of age admitted to University Health System Hospitals with a primary or secondary diagnosis of CKD between January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008. A clustered binomial logistic regression using the GEE methodology was used to identify predictors of IV iron utilization. Only 8% (n = 6678) of CKD patients on ESA therapy received IV iron supplementation in university hospitals. Those receiving iron used significantly less amounts of ESAs. Patient demographics (age, race, primary payer), patient clinical conditions (admission status, severity of illness, dialysis status), and physician specialty were identified as predictors of IV iron use in CKD patients. Use of IV iron with ESAs was low despite recommendations from consensus guidelines. The low treatment rate of IV iron represents a gap in treatment practices and signals an opportunity for healthcare improvement in CKD anemic patients.

Diagnosis of iron deficiency in patients undergoing hemodialysis

To diagnose iron deficiency in patients undergoing hemodialysis, the percentage of hypochromic RBCs (with cellular hemoglobin concentration <280 g/L [HYPO%]) and mean reticulocyte hemoglobin content (CHret) provided by the Siemens ADVIA 120 and 2120 analyzers (Siemens Diagnostic Solutions, Tarrytown, NY) were proposed as alternatives to biochemical tests. Sysmex, with its XE-5000 analyzer (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan), also proposed the percentage of erythrocytes with cellular hemoglobin content lower than 17 pg (%Hypo-He) and equivalent of the mean reticulocyte hemoglobin content (Ret-He) with similar clinical applications. Our aim was to verify the clinical usefulness of the biochemical and cellular parameters as predictors of iron deficiency in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. We studied 69 patients undergoing hemodialysis 3 times weekly. The baseline values of serum ferritin and percentage of transferrin saturation were poor predictors of iron responsiveness. Better ability was demonstrated by reticulocyte indices (area under the curve [AUC], 0.74 for CHret and 0.72 for Ret-He; best cutoff values, 31.2 and 30.6 pg, respectively) and erythrocyte parameters (AUC, 0.72 for HYPO% and 0.68 for %Hypo-He; best cutoff values, 5.8 and 2.7, respectively). The newly proposed Ret-He and %Hypo-He can provide clinicians with information equivalent to CHret and HYPO%.

Maintenance of elevated versus physiological iron indices in non-anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

An optimal haemoglobin (Hb) response to erythropoietin requires elevated iron indices in dialysis patients; however, it is unknown if the same applies in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

One hundred patients [CKD Stages 3-5, Hb >or= 110 g/L, iron replete, erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA)-naive, 47% diabetic, median age 69.5 years] were block-randomized in an open-label study to receive up to 200 mg intravenous iron sucrose (Group A, n = 52) bimonthly or oral iron sulphate (Group B) to maintain raised and normal iron indices (respectively) over 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change in Hb concentration at 12 months or at termination after at least 6 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients reached the primary endpoint (43, Group A; 42, Group B). Initial Hb was 119 +/- 7 vs 116 +/- 12 g/L (mean +/- standard deviation); ferritin 122 (71-176), median (inter-quartile range), vs 90 microg/L (58-150); transferrin saturation (TSat) 22 (18-26) vs 21% (15-24); and creatinine 240 (195-313) vs 230 micromol/L (184-352). Ferritin and TSat differed by month 2 [157 (103-220) vs 96 microg/L (73-162), P = 0.003] and month 6 [25 (20-31) vs 21% (17-27), P = 0.02], respectively. At study end, Hb did not differ between groups (121 +/- 10 vs 117 +/- 13 g/L). Ferritin was 362 (310-458) vs 125 microg/L (84-190), P < 0.001; TSat 30 (23-34) vs 21% (18-24), P < 0.001; and creatinine 229 (188-326) vs 272 micromol/L (195-413), P = NS. For patients (Groups A and B, n = 27 in each group) whose creatinine regression slope increased (indicating worsening function), the fall in Hb over 12 months also did not differ between groups despite adequate separation in iron indices. Serious adverse events overall did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated iron indices did not increase Hb synthesis in ESA-naive, iron replete, pre-dialysis patients with Hb >110 g/L.

Upper limit of serum ferritin: misinterpretation of the 2006 KDOQI anemia guidelines

Intravenous iron treatment in hemodialysis patients improves response to recombinant human erythropoietin and facilitates achievement of targets for hemoglobin and hematocrit. Excessive treatment, however, could expose patients to risks related to iron overload and oxidative stress. Therefore, international treatment guidelines generally recommend that intravenous (i.v.) iron be discontinued when serum ferritin is >500-1,000 ng/ml. In the current review, relevant issues that inform decisions as to what levels of serum ferritin should be used as the upper limit for treatment are considered. A conclusion is reached that the current published literature is inadequate for developing evidence-based guidelines on this issue. Instead, clinical judgment is critical to properly weigh risks and benefits of i.v. iron treatment, and to determine whether iron treatment is appropriate for a given patient with higher levels of iron tests.

Ferric gluconate reduces epoetin requirements in hemodialysis patients with elevated ferritin

The Dialysis Patients Response to IV Iron with Elevated Ferritin (DRIVE) study demonstrated the efficacy of intravenous ferric gluconate to improve hemoglobin levels in anemic hemodialysis patients who were receiving adequate epoetin doses and who had ferritin levels between 500 and 1200 ng/ml and transferrin saturation (TSAT) < or = 25%. The DRIVE-II study reported here was a 6-wk observational extension designed to investigate how ferric gluconate impacted epoetin dosage after DRIVE. During DRIVE-II, treating nephrologists and anemia managers adjusted doses of epoetin and intravenous iron as clinically indicated. By the end of observation, patients in the ferric gluconate group required significantly less epoetin than their DRIVE dose (mean change of -7527 +/- 18,021 IU/wk, P = 0.003), whereas the epoetin dose essentially did not change for patients in the control group (mean change of 649 +/- 19,987 IU/wk, P = 0.809). Mean hemoglobin, TSAT, and serum ferritin levels remained higher in the ferric gluconate group than in the control group (P = 0.062, P < 0.001, and P = 0.014, respectively). Over the entire 12-wk study period (DRIVE plus DRIVE-II), the control group experienced significantly more serious adverse events than the ferric gluconate group (incidence rate ratio = 1.73, P = 0.041). In conclusion, ferric gluconate maintains hemoglobin and allows lower epoetin doses in anemic hemodialysis patients with low TSAT and ferritin levels up to 1200 ng/ml.

Functional iron deficiency in hemodialysis patients with high ferritin

Although functional iron deficiency (FID) may be present in hemodialysis (HD) patients with high serum ferritin levels (>800 ng/mL), current protocols often preclude the use of intravenous (IV) iron in these patients. However, it has not been demonstrated that iron supplementation during erythropoietin therapy is ineffective or unsafe in increasing hemoglobin (Hb) levels in patients with high serum ferritin. This report describes the hematologic efficacy and safety of ferric gluconate (FG) therapy in patients with serum ferritin >800 ng/mL. A retrospective analysis was performed on HD patients at a single California dialysis center from January 1 to December 31, 2003. Patients classified as having high ferritin levels (serum ferritin >800 ng/mL on at least 66% of routine monthly measurements and transferrin saturation [TSAT] <25% on at least 1 occasion) were stratified as follows: patients in Group I were suspected of having FID and received FG > or =250 mg IV over a 3-month period when Hb was <11 g/dL, and patients in Group II were thought not to have FID and received <250 mg FG over a 3-month period. Both groups received standard recombinant human erythropoietin therapy as per the unit's protocol. Of 496 patients, 95 exhibited high ferritin and of these, 39 patients had sufficient data for analysis. Group I patients (n=14) showed a significant increase in Hb levels compared with Group II (n=25). There was no increase in ferritin levels in response to iron administration. No significant differences in hospitalizations or infections were observed between groups. Hemodialysis patients with high ferritin levels may have FID, and IV iron therapy safely improves FID in some patients. A larger randomized trial examining the optimal management of iron administration in HD patients with high ferritin levels is warranted.

Weekly low-dose treatment with intravenous iron sucrose maintains iron status and decreases epoetin requirement in iron-replete haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Haemodialysis patients need sustained treatment with intravenous iron because iron deficiency limits the efficacy of recombinant human epoetin therapy in these patients. However, the optimal intravenous iron maintenance dose has not been established yet.

METHODS

We performed a prospective multicentre clinical trial in iron-replete haemodialysis patients to evaluate the efficacy of weekly low-dose (50 mg) intravenous iron sucrose administration for 6 months to maintain the iron status, and to examine the effect on epoetin dosage needed to maintain stable haemoglobin values in these patients. Fifty patients were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, single arm, phase IV study.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (84%) completed the study. After 6 months of intravenous iron sucrose treatment, the mean ferritin value showed a tendency to increase slightly from 405 +/- 159 at baseline to 490 +/- 275 microg/l at the end of the study, but iron, transferrin levels and transferrin saturation did not change. The haemoglobin level remained stable (12 +/- 1.1 at baseline and 12.1 +/- 1.5 g/dl at the end of the study). The mean dose of darbepoetin alfa could be reduced from 0.75 to 0.46 microg/kg/week; epoetin alfa was decreased from 101 to 74 IU/kg/week; and the mean dose of epoetin beta could be reduced from 148 to 131 IU/kg/week at the end of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A regular 50 mg weekly dosing schedule of iron sucrose maintains stable iron stores and haemoglobin levels in haemodialysed patients and allows considerable dose reductions for epoetins. Low-dose intravenous iron therapy may represent an optimal approach to treat the continuous loss of iron in dialysis patients.

Iron indices: what do they really mean?

Routine monitoring of body iron stores is an essential component of overall management for the patient on hemodialysis. Adequate iron levels are important for the prevention and treatment of iron-deficiency anemia, which is associated with reduced physical functioning, cardiovascular disease, and poor quality of life. Hemodialysis patients are at especially high risk for iron-deficiency anemia, owing to continuous blood losses and supraphysiologic levels of erythropoiesis driven by recombinant human erythropoietin therapy. Unfortunately, the accurate determination of iron status in these patients can be a challenging task, which is made more difficult by inflammation, infections, and the large number of comorbid conditions that can affect commonly used indices of body iron stores. Despite their limitations, transferrin saturation (TSAT) and serum ferritin remain the cornerstones of iron status assessment. Because these values can be altered by a number of non-iron-related factors, it is necessary to go beyond these measures and draw upon additional sources of information to determine the patient's iron status. Other important factors to consider when assessing the need for iron therapy include evidence of underlying inflammatory processes that may block iron mobilization and distort the standard iron indices, the results of alternative iron indices, and the patient's recent history of iron administration. Frequently, the response to a gram of intravenous (i.v.) iron is a safe and effective way to determine the role of iron deficiency in the anemia of the problematic patient. The chronic inflammatory state associated with malnutrition and clinical or subclinical infections substantially increases the risk of misdiagnosing the patient with iron overload and may place the patient at risk of iron deficiency owing to inappropriate withdrawal of i.v. iron therapy. To avoid the risks of withholding iron therapy, the nephrologist must keep this relationship in mind whenever serum ferritin testing suggests replete iron stores, whereas TSAT testing suggests insufficient iron availability.

HEMATOLOGY: ISSUES IN THE DIALYSIS PATIENT: Erythropoietin Resistance in the Treatment of the Anemia of Chronic Renal Failure

Resistance to erythropoietin therapy is a common complication of the modern management of anemia in chronic kidney disease. Iron deficiency, deficiency of other nutrients, toxins, infections, and inadequate dialysis account for the vast majority of episodes of such resistance.

Erythropoietin dose requirements when converting from subcutaneous to intravenous administration among patients on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal route for administration of exogenous erythropoietin remains controversial, particularly after the increased incidence in pure red cell aplasia. In Canada, the majority of hemodialysis units have converted to the intravenous route for administration of erythropoietin to potentially decrease the risk of pure red cell aplasia.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the difference in the weight-adjusted, weekly erythropoietin dose (units/kg/wk) administered by the subcutaneous compared with the intravenous route in a chronic hemodialysis population followed for 12 months.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study recruited patients receiving subcutaneous erythropoietin for at least 3 months while undergoing dialysis in a tertiary care hemodialysis program. Participants were switched to intravenous erythropoietin, and the average weekly dose was recorded at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. Anemia management and hemoglobin, iron, and delivered dialysis dose targets remained constant throughout the study.

RESULTS

The erythropoietin dose increased by 24.5 units/kg/wk (95% CI 12.7 to 36.3; p < 0.001), representing a 20.2% increase (95% CI 10.5% to 29.9%; p < 0.001) 12 months after conversion from the subcutaneous to intravenous route of administration. Both patients with and without residual renal function at baseline required a significant increase in the intravenous dose.

CONCLUSIONS

A 20.2% increase in erythropoietin dose was required to maintain hemoglobin targets between 11 and 12 g/dL after conversion from a subcutaneous to intravenous formulation. Healthcare funding agencies need to reexamine the cost benefit of using intravenous erythropoietin in the hemodialysis population with a low incidence of pure red cell aplasia.

Protein-losing enteropathy associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: response to cyclophosphamide

Protein-losing enteropathy is a rare manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) leading to hypoalbuminemia and anasarca. We report the case of a woman with SLE who presented chronic hypoalbuminemia diagnosed as protein-losing enteropathy associated with SLE. She was refractory to prednisone and azathioprine administration but showed good response to cyclophosphamide. The diagnosis and management of hypoalbuminemia in lupus-associated enteropathy are discussed.

Haemoglobin response to subcutaneous versus intravenous epoetin alfa administration in iron-replete haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Numerous prior studies have reported that a substantially higher dose of epoetin is required to maintain haemoglobin (Hb) concentration when patients are switched from a subcutaneous (s.c.) to intravenous (i.v.) route of administration. Many of the reported trials, however, involved patients who did not have adequate serum iron levels. It was hypothesized that patients with adequate iron stores who are switched from one route of administration to the other without a change in dose will experience substantially less change in their Hb concentration.

METHODS

Haemodialysis patients who were iron replete (ferritin 300-800 microg/L, transferrin saturation (TSAT) 25-50%) participated in a prospective, randomized cross-over trial receiving epoetin for 3 months either by s.c. or i.v. injection followed by a further 3 months of epoetin via the other route. The principal aim was to determine changes in Hb concentration without altering the weekly epoetin dose. The secondary aim was to assess whether the frequency of dosing (once, twice or thrice weekly) influenced the Hb concentration response.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (mean age 62 years, 60% male) entered the study and 15 withdrew prior to study completion. Forty-three patients began s.c. epoetin alfa administration (group A) and 38 on i.v. (group B). Median ferritin and TSAT at entry for groups A and B were 409 and 394 microg/L (NS) and 31 and 32% (NS), respectively, which remained within the target range during the study. Median epoetin doses for groups A and B were similar (90 vs 93 IU/kg per week, NS). After 3 months, the mean Hb concentration rose for group A (SC; 118.7-121.9 g/L (P = 0.03)) but it fell for group B (i.v.; 119.1-116.0 g/L (P = 0.019)). Following the change in route of administration, the Hb concentration for group A (i.v.) fell by 5.1% over 3 months (121.9-115.4, P < 0.001) and rose by 2.8% for group B (s.c.) over 3 months (116.0-119.7, P = 0.001). Similar significant changes in the Hb concentration were seen at different dosing frequencies.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous administration of epoetin produces a significant, although slight clinical change in Hb concentration compared with i.v. administration in stable, iron replete, haemodialysis patients. A similar effect appears to prevail regardless of the frequency of injections given.

Effect of variability in anemia management on hemoglobin outcomes in ESRD

BACKGROUND

Hemoglobin (Hgb) levels fluctuate in patients with end-stage renal disease over time. This study quantified Hgb level variability and the likelihood of falling within the Hgb level goal range of 11 to 12 g/dL. Implications on the percentage of patients exceeding 3-month rolling average Hgb levels of 12, 12.5, and 13 g/dL were determined.

METHODS

Phase I (n = 65,009) tracked patients with Hgb values initially outside the goal range (<11 or >12 g/dL) during 2000. Correlation with facility-specific thresholds also was evaluated. Phase II (n = 48,133) quantified variation in 3-month rolling average Hgb levels in a subset with greater than 10 months of data (mean Hgb, 11.4 +/- 1.3 g/dL).

RESULTS

A total of 24,948 patients (38.4%) had Hgb levels between 11 and 12 g/dL. In only 8% did Hgb levels consistently remain less than 11 g/dL, and in 18%, greater than 12 g/dL all year. Twenty-nine percent (18,633 patients) moved from below to above target range or vice versa. Greater mean facility Hgb level correlated with a greater percentage of patients with Hgb levels greater than 10 g/dL (R2 = 0.49) and greater than 12.5 g/dL (R2 = 0.61). For facilities to have 90% or greater of patients with 3-month rolling average Hgb levels greater than 10 g/dL, 13% to 31% of patients will have 3-month rolling average Hgb values greater than 12.5 g/dL. The average individual patient is expected to have a +/-1.4-g/dL fluctuation in 3-month rolling average Hgb levels per year. Despite increased mean Hgb levels and erythropoietin (EPO) and iron use, the spread of the Hgb distribution curve remained unchanged in the last 6 years.

CONCLUSION

Variability caused by laboratory assays, biological factors, and therapeutic response determines patient Hgb level variability. Improving factors that can be manipulated (eg, standardizing EPO and iron algorithms) and adjustment of the target Hgb level range, specifically, by increasing the upper bound, likely will decrease the observed variability and further enhance the quality of anemia management.