Comparing Standard Versus Extended Culture Duration in Acute Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Prolonged incubation time unwarranted for acute periprosthetic joint infections

Current laboratory protocols for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) involve a standard 10- to 14-day incubation period. However, recent evidence indicates considerable variability in the time to diagnosis (TTD) between acute and chronic PJIs. TTD is also influenced by the employed culture media and sample types. Enriched liquid media, such as broths and blood culture bottles, along with sonication fluid culture, are commonly used, though their incremental benefit for PJI diagnosis remains debated. We retrospectively analyzed 187 confirmed hip and knee PJIs, each with at least three intraoperative samples. Comparison of TTD among early acute (n = 68), late acute (n = 52), and late chronic (n = 67) PJIs revealed a significant difference, particularly between late acute and late chronic infections (P < 0.004). Early acute and late acute PJIs were diagnosed within 5 days in 97.1% and 98.1% of cases, respectively, contrasting with 14 days required for 97.1% of late chronic PJIs. Enriched liquid media significantly improved species detection, especially in polymicrobial and anaerobic infections. Pediatric and anaerobic blood culture bottles demonstrated superior efficacy over thioglycolate broths for diagnostic confirmation. Sonication fluid culture was essential for confirming diagnoses in 17.6% of cases. Our findings highlight that clinical presentation, rather than time since primary arthroplasty, should guide incubation duration: both early acute and late acute PJIs can be diagnosed within 5 days. Medical microbiology laboratories should consider shorter incubation times for acute PJIs to optimize diagnostic efficiency. The use of blood culture bottles and sonication fluid culture proves invaluable for accurate PJI diagnosis.

IMPORTANCE

While molecular techniques are becoming increasingly employed, culture remains the gold standard for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections. However, guidance for laboratory protocols is limited and highly variable. This article aims to increase diagnostic efficiency by providing concrete recommendations for medical microbiology laboratories.

Can pre-analytical procedures improve microbiological culture yield in patients with periprosthetic infections?

BACKGROUND

The detection of causative pathogens plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and targeted treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). While there have been improvements in analytic methods in the past, pre-analytical procedures have not yet been sufficiently investigated. The objective of this study was to compare the culture yield of four different pre-analytical procedures.

METHODS

Patients with perioperative diagnosis of PJI were included in a single center cross-sectional study (2021-2022). Tissue samples (n = 20) of each patient were randomly and equally distributed to each of the four study arms. Tissue samples were either send to the laboratory without culture medium (group A) or were transported in thioglycolate medium immediately after sampling at three different temperatures (room temperature, 4 °C, 37° for 24 h; group B-D). Culture media were investigated for growth on days 1, 3, 7, 12, 14. All organisms, the number of positive samples and the time to positivity were recorded and compared between the study arms. Single positive cultures were considered as contamination.

RESULTS

In total, 71 patients were included. The proportions of culture negative samples (10-15%) and polymicrobial infections (51-54%) were comparable between the four arms. Seven patients (10%) were culture-negative in group A, but showed growth in thioglycolate media (group B-D). Furthermore, 13% of patients showed growth in all groups, but additional organisms were cultured in thioglycolate. There was growth beyond day 7 of culturing only in thioglycolate, but not in group A. A storage temperature of 4 °C showed a longer time to positivity compared to the other groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-analytical storage of tissue samples in thioglycolate broth did not improve the culture yield and did not detect additional cases of infection compared to the standard (pre-analytical storage in sterile containers). However, including a thioglycolate medium to the sampling algorithm reduced the rate of culture-negative infections and helped to identify additional organisms.

Comparison of Five-Day vs. Fourteen-Day Incubation of Cultures for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are among the most morbid complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The ideal incubation time, however, for intraoperative cultures for PJI diagnosis remains unclear. As such, the aim of this study was to determine if any differences existed in culture-positive rates and organism detection between five-day and fourteen-day cultures. Methods: This retrospective cohort study consisted of THA cases diagnosed with PJI performed between May 2014 and May 2020 at a single tertiary-care institution. Analyses compared five-day and fourteen-day cultures and carried out a pre-specified subgroup analysis by organism and PJI type. Results: A total of 147 surgeries were performed in 101 patients (57.1% females), of which 65% (n = 98) obtained five-day cultures and 34% (n = 49) obtained fourteen-day cultures. The positive culture rate was 67.3% (n = 99) with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common pathogen identified (n = 41 specimens, 41.4%). The positive culture rate was not significantly different between groups (66.3% five-day, 69.4% fourteen-day, p = 0.852). Fourteen-day cultures had a significantly longer time-to-positive culture (5.0 days) than five-day cultures (3.0 days, p < 0.001), a higher rate of fungi (5.6% vs. 0%), and a lower rate of Gram-negatives (4.5% vs. 18.7%, p = 0.016). Conclusions: Fourteen-day cultures did not increase the positivity rate, had higher rates of slow-growth pathogens, and had a longer time-to-positivization than five-day cultures. Prolonged culture holds may provide more thorough organism detection for PJI without increasing the diagnostic culture yield.

Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for the early prosthetic joint infection of total knee and hip arthroplasties: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents one of the most fearsome complications of joint replacement. No international consensus has been reached regarding the best approach for early prosthetic knee and hip infections. The aim of this updated systematic review is to assess whether debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is an effective choice of treatment in early postoperative and acute hematogenous PJI.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The diagnostic criteria defining a PJI, the most present pathogen, and the days between the index procedure and the onset of the PJI were extracted from the selected articles. Additionally, the mean follow-up, antibiotic regimen, and success rate of the treatment were also reported.

RESULTS

The articles included provided a cohort of 970 patients. Ten studies specified the joint of their cohort in PJIs regarding either hip prostheses or knee prostheses, resulting in 454 total knees and 460 total hips. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 92 years old. Success rates for the DAIR treatments in the following cohort ranged from 55.5% up to a maximum of 90% (mean value of 71%).

CONCLUSION

Even though the DAIR procedure is quite limited, it is still considered an effective option for patients developing an early post-operative or acute hematogenous PJI. However, there is a lack of studies, in particular randomized control trials (RCTs), comparing DAIR with one-stage and two-stage revision protocols in the setting of early PJIs, reflecting the necessity to conduct further high-quality studies to face the burden of early PJI.

The Challenge of Emerging Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens in Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infections

➤

An increase in resistant bacterial pathogens has occurred over the last 4 decades.

➤

Careful patient selection and improving or correcting risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) before elective surgical treatment are strongly recommended.

➤

Appropriate microbiological methods, including those used to detect and grow Cutibacterium acnes, are recommended.

➤

Antimicrobial agents used in the prevention or management of infection should be selected appropriately and the duration of therapy should be carefully considered in order to mitigate the risk of developing bacterial resistance.

➤

Molecular methods including rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostics, 16S sequencing, and/or shotgun and/or targeted whole-genome sequencing are recommended in culture-negative cases of PJI.

➤

Expert consultation with an infectious diseases specialist (if available) is recommended to assist with the appropriate antimicrobial management and monitoring of patients with PJI.

The diagnostic value of blood sample NGS in patients with early periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty

The diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of blood samples from patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was evaluated by comparing it with drainage fluid NGS and bacterial culture. The study was designed as a retrospective diagnostic test. Thirty-six infected patients were diagnosed with PJI according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and 57 volunteers were included in our study. NGS and bacterial culture were chosen to detect PJI after THA. Blood samples and drainage fluid were collected for NGS, and the drainage fluid, which was collected at the same time as the NGS drainage fluid sample, was used for bacterial culture. The primary outcomes of interest were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. In the infection group, 31 patients showed positive results by blood sample NGS, 33 patients showed positive results by drainage fluid NGS, and 17 patients showed positive bacterial culture results. In the control group, the results of 2 blood sample NGS, 16 drainage fluid NGS, and 3 bacterial cultures were positive. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the blood sample were 0.86, 0.96, and 0.92, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the drainage fluid samples were 0.92, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of bacterial culture were 0.47, 0.95, and 0.79, respectively. The study demonstrated that both the sensitivity and specificity of NGS were higher than those of bacterial culture, regardless of the kind of sample. Compared with drainage fluid NGS, the sensitivity of blood sample NGS was slightly lower (0.86 vs 0.92), but blood sample NGS showed higher specificity (0.96 vs 0.72). In total, the diagnostic value of blood sample NGS was superior to that of drainage fluid NGS and bacterial culture. The majority of infected patients could be identified by blood sample NGS. Moreover, because of its high specificity, blood sample NGS can not only detect infectious bacteria but also distinguish infectious from non-infectious bacteria, which is dramatically different from using drainage fluid NGS.

Are There Any Changes in the Causative Microorganisms Isolated in the Last Years from Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infections? Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Results Analysis

BACKGROUND

PJIs following total hip and knee arthroplasty represent severe complications with broad implications, and with significant disability, morbidity, and mortality. To be able to provide correct and effective management of these cases, an accurate diagnosis is needed. Classically, acute PJIs are characterized by a preponderance of virulent microorganisms, and chronic PJIs are characterized by a preponderance of less-virulent pathogens like coagulase-negative staphylococci or Cutibacterium species. This paper aims to analyze if there are any changes in the causative microorganisms isolated in the last years, as well as to provide a subanalysis of the types of PJIs.

METHODS

In this single-center study, we prospectively included all retrospectively consecutive collected data from patients aged over 18 years that were hospitalized from 2016 through 2022, and patients that underwent a joint arthroplasty revision surgery. A standardized diagnostic protocol was used in all cases, and the 2021 EBJIS definition criteria for PJIs was used.

RESULTS

114 patients were included in our analysis; of them, 67 were diagnosed with PJIs, 12 were acute/acute hematogenous, and 55 were chronic PJIs. 49 strains of gram-positive aerobic or microaerophilic cocci and 35 gram-negative aerobic bacilli were isolated. Overall, Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolated pathogen, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). All cases of acute/acute hematogenous PJIs were caused by gram-positive aerobic or microaerophilic cocci pathogens. Both Staphylococcus epidermidis and methicillin-resistant S. aureus were involved in 91.66% of the acute/acute hematogenous PJIs cases. 21.8% of the chronic PJIs cases were caused by pathogens belonging to the Enterobacterales group of bacteria, followed by the gram-negative nonfermenting bacilli group of bacteria, which were involved in 18.4% of the cases. 12 chronic cases were polymicrobial.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in acute PJIs could be focused on the bacteria belonging to the gram-positive aerobic or microaerophilic cocci, but the results should be analyzed carefully, and the local resistance of the pathogens should be taken into consideration.

Diagnostic Performance of Metagenomic Next⁃Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection Using Tissue Specimens

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) using tissue from hip/knee rapidly and precisely, especially in patients who had received antibiotic treatment within the preceding two weeks.

Methods

From May 2020 to March 2022, 52 cases with suspected PJI were enrolled. mNGS was performed on surgical tissue samples. The sensitivity and specificity of mNGS in diagnosis was evaluated using culture in conjunction with MSIS criteria. This study also looked at how antibiotic use affected culture and mNGS efficacy.

Results

According to MSIS criteria, 31 of the 44 cases had PJI, and 13 were classified in the aseptic loosening group. Sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value (PPV/NPV), positive/negative likelihood ratio (PLR/NLR), and area under the curve (AUC) of mNGS assay were 80.6% (71.9-91.8%), 84.6 (73.7-97.9%), 92.6 (84.2-98.7%), 64.7 (58.6-74.7%), 5.241 (4.081-6.693), 0.229 (0.108-0.482) and 0.826 (0.786-0.967), respectively, with MSIS as a reference. When MSIS was used as a reference, the results of culture assay were 45.2% (40.8-51.5%), 100 (100.0-100.0%), 100 (100.0-100.0%), 43.3 (39.1-49.5%), +∞, 0.548 (0.396-0.617) and 0.726 (0.621-0.864), respectively. The AUC values for mNGS and culture were 0.826 and 0.731, respectively, and the differences were insignificant. mNGS demonstrated higher sensitivity than culture in PJI subjects who had previously received antibiotic treatment within 2 weeks (69.5% vs 23.1%, P = 0.03).

Conclusion

In our series, mNGS yield a higher sensitivity for diagnosis and pathogen detection of PJI compared to microbiological culture. Additionally, mNGS is less affected by prior antibiotic exposure.

Positivity Trends of Bacterial Cultures from Cases of Acute and Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Background: There is no clear distinction in the literature regarding the positivity trends of bacterial cultures in acute and chronic prosthetic joint infections. Methods: We prospectively included in this study all consecutive patients, aged over 18 years, that were hospitalized from September 2016 through December 2019, that underwent a joint arthroplasty revision surgery. Results: Forty patients were included in our analysis, 11 acute/acute hematogenous and 29 chronic PJIs. We were able to identify all strains of acute/acute hematogenous PJIs within 3 days, whereas this took 8 days for chronic PJIs. Sonication fluid cultures increased the positivity rate and helped in identifying rare pathogens such as Ralstonia pickettii from chronic PJIs, but also increased the number of identified strains from acute PJIs. Culturing synovial fluid in our study did not seem to have a clear benefit compared to sonication fluid and periprosthetic tissue cultures. Conclusion: There was a different positivity trend in bacterial cultures. Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy can be re-evaluated after 3 days for acute PJIs. A prolonged incubation time, especially in the case of chronic PJIs, is mandatory; however, extending the incubation period beyond 14 days would not further improve the ability to identify microorganisms.

Simultaneous Propionibacterium avidum and Propionibacterium acnes Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection: A Case Report

Prosthetic hip joint replacement is considered the operation of the 20th century because of its wide diffusion and good outcome. More than 1 million prostheses are implanted worldwide annually. Although hip arthroplasty is considered a safe procedure, different complications can occur in relation with surgery. Periprosthesic joint infection is the most feared for its morbidity for the patients, and for the economic costs it generates. Most surgical site infections after hip arthroplasty are related to frequent germs as Staphylococci or Enterobacteriaceae, while Propionibacterium infections are more rare and often challenging in diagnosis and therapy. We report a case of a 77-year-old diabetic overweight male patient who developed a periprosthetic hip infection due to P. avidum and P. acnes after a mini-invasive direct anterior approach. To our knowledge, this represents the first case of chronic periprosthetic hip joint co-infection.

Novel strategies to diagnose prosthetic or native bone and joint infections

INTRODUCTION

Bone and Joint Infections (BJI) are medically important, costly and occur in native and prosthetic joints. Arthroplasties will increase significantly in absolute numbers over time as well as the incidence of Prosthetic Joint Infections (PJI). Diagnosis of BJI and PJI is sub-optimal. The available diagnostic tests have variable effectiveness, are often below standard in sensitivity and/or specificity, and carry significant contamination risks during the collection of clinical samples. Improvement of diagnostics is urgently needed.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a narrative review on current and future diagnostic microbiology technologies. Pathogen identification, antibiotic resistance detection, and assessment of the epidemiology of infections via bacterial typing are considered useful for improved patient management. We confirm the continuing importance of culture methods and successful introduction of molecular, mass spectrometry-mediated and next-generation genome sequencing technologies. The diagnostic algorithms for BJI must be better defined, especially in the context of diversity of both disease phenotypes and clinical specimens rendered available.

EXPERT OPINION

Whether interventions in BJI or PJI are surgical or chemo-therapeutic (antibiotics and bacteriophages included), prior sensitive and specific pathogen detection remains a therapy-substantiating necessity. Innovative tests for earlier and more sensitive and specific detection of bacterial pathogens in BJI are urgently needed.

Occurrence of Rare Pathogens at the Site of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study

The frequency and clinical relevance of rare pathogens at the site of periprosthetic infections of the hip and knee joint and their antibiotic resistance profiles have not yet been assessed in-depth. We retrospectively analyzed all periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections that occurred between 2016 and 2020 in a single center in southwest Germany. Among 165 infections, 9.7% were caused by rare microorganisms such as Veilonella sp., Pasteurella sp., Pantoea sp., Citrobacter koseri, Serratia marcescens, Parvimonas micra, Clostridium difficile, Finegoldia magna, Morganella morganii, and yeasts. No resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam, carbapenemes, fluoroquinolones, or gentamicin was observed. Some bacteria displayed resistance to ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, and cefuroxime. We present follow-up data of patients with infections due to rare pathogens and discuss the importance of close, interdisciplinary collaboration between orthopedic surgeons and clinical microbiologists to carefully select the most appropriate anti-infective treatment regimens for the increasing number of patients with such infections.

Do Positive Cultures at Second Stage Re-Implantation Increase the Risk for Reinfection in Two-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative cultures are important in the diagnosis and targeted treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Positive cultures at reimplantation during a two-stage exchange are discussed as a risk factor for reinfection. The aim of this study is the investigation of the incidence and risk factors for positive cultures during reimplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 204 patients (111 knees, 93 hips) who were treated between 2012 and 2016 for PJI using a two-stage exchange protocol at a median follow-up of 42 months. PJI was diagnosed using the criteria of the musculoskeletal infection society (MSIS) of 2011. All cultural findings from first and second stage surgery were recorded. The primary endpoint was revision for infection. Risk factors for positive cultures and reinfection were analyzed.

RESULTS

During reimplantation 25% (51/204) of patients had at least one positive culture, in 19.1% (39/204) only a single culture. Patients with culture-negative infections had a higher risk for positive cultures at reimplantation (HR 2.946 (95% CI 1.247-6.961), P = .014) and patients with infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) (HR 3.547 (95% CI 1.7-7.4), P = .001). Patients with positive cultures during reimplantation had a higher risk for reinfection (HR 2.27 (95% CI 1.181-4.363), P = .014) as well as patients with a single positive culture (HR 2.421 (95% CI 1.139-5.143), P = .021).

CONCLUSION

As positive cultures are common and increase reinfection risk irrespective of their numbers, longer antibiotic therapy following reimplantation can be an option. Single positive cultures in reimplantation surgery should not be considered contamination.

Current Clinical Methods for Detection of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection

Background: Currently, one of the most pressing problems in the field of orthopedic surgery is peri-prosthetic joint infection [PJI]. While there are numerous ways to detect PJI, current clinical detection methods differ across institutions and have varying criteria and protocols. Some of these methods include the Modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society system, culturing, polymerase chain reaction, the determination of the presence of certain biomarkers, testing for the presence of alpha defensin peptides, and leukocyte level testing. Methods: This review summarizes the most recent publications in the field of PJI detection to highlight current strengths as well as provide future directions to find the system for the quickest, cost-effective, and most accurate way to diagnose these types of infections. Results: The results of this literature review suggest that, while each method of diagnosis has its advantages, each has various drawbacks as well. Current methods can be expensive, take days to weeks to complete, be prone to contamination, and can produce ambiguous results. Conclusions: The findings in this review emphasize the need for a more comprehensive and accurate system for diagnosing PJI. In addition, the specific comparison of advantages and drawbacks can be useful for researchers and clinicians with goals of creating new diagnostic tests for PJIs, as well as in clinical scenarios to determine the correct treatment for patients.