1
|
Cox MM, Goodman MF, Keck JL, van Oijen A, Lovett ST, Robinson A. Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2023; 87:e0007822. [PMID: 37212693 PMCID: PMC10304936 DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00078-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
When replication forks encounter template lesions, one result is lesion skipping, where the stalled DNA polymerase transiently stalls, disengages, and then reinitiates downstream to leave the lesion behind in a postreplication gap. Despite considerable attention in the 6 decades since postreplication gaps were discovered, the mechanisms by which postreplication gaps are generated and repaired remain highly enigmatic. This review focuses on postreplication gap generation and repair in the bacterium Escherichia coli. New information to address the frequency and mechanism of gap generation and new mechanisms for their resolution are described. There are a few instances where the formation of postreplication gaps appears to be programmed into particular genomic locations, where they are triggered by novel genomic elements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M. Cox
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Myron F. Goodman
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, University Park, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, University Park, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - James L. Keck
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Wisconsin—Madison School of Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Antoine van Oijen
- Molecular Horizons, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan T. Lovett
- Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew Robinson
- Molecular Horizons, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maloisel L, Ma E, Phipps J, Deshayes A, Mattarocci S, Marcand S, Dubrana K, Coïc E. Rad51 filaments assembled in the absence of the complex formed by the Rad51 paralogs Rad55 and Rad57 are outcompeted by translesion DNA polymerases on UV-induced ssDNA gaps. PLoS Genet 2023; 19:e1010639. [PMID: 36749784 PMCID: PMC9937489 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The bypass of DNA lesions that block replicative polymerases during DNA replication relies on DNA damage tolerance pathways. The error-prone translesion synthesis (TLS) pathway depends on specialized DNA polymerases that incorporate nucleotides in front of base lesions, potentially inducing mutagenesis. Two error-free pathways can bypass the lesions: the template switching pathway, which uses the sister chromatid as a template, and the homologous recombination pathway (HR), which also can use the homologous chromosome as template. The balance between error-prone and error-free pathways controls the mutagenesis level. Therefore, it is crucial to precisely characterize factors that influence the pathway choice to better understand genetic stability at replication forks. In yeast, the complex formed by the Rad51 paralogs Rad55 and Rad57 promotes HR and template-switching at stalled replication forks. At DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), this complex promotes Rad51 filament formation and stability, notably by counteracting the Srs2 anti-recombinase. To explore the role of the Rad55-Rad57 complex in error-free pathways, we monitored the genetic interactions between Rad55-Rad57, the translesion polymerases Polζ or Polη, and Srs2 following UV radiation that induces mostly single-strand DNA gaps. We found that the Rad55-Rad57 complex was involved in three ways. First, it protects Rad51 filaments from Srs2, as it does at DSBs. Second, it promotes Rad51 filament stability independently of Srs2. Finally, we observed that UV-induced HR is almost abolished in Rad55-Rad57 deficient cells, and is partially restored upon Polζ or Polη depletion. Hence, we propose that the Rad55-Rad57 complex is essential to promote Rad51 filament stability on single-strand DNA gaps, notably to counteract the error-prone TLS polymerases and mutagenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent Maloisel
- Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, UMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
- * E-mail: (LM); (EC)
| | - Emilie Ma
- Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, UMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Jamie Phipps
- Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, UMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Alice Deshayes
- Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, UMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Stefano Mattarocci
- Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, UMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Stéphane Marcand
- Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, UMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Karine Dubrana
- Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, UMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Eric Coïc
- Université de Paris and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, UMR Stabilité Génétique Cellules Souches et Radiations, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
- * E-mail: (LM); (EC)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taglialatela A, Leuzzi G, Sannino V, Cuella-Martin R, Huang JW, Wu-Baer F, Baer R, Costanzo V, Ciccia A. REV1-Polζ maintains the viability of homologous recombination-deficient cancer cells through mutagenic repair of PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps. Mol Cell 2021; 81:4008-4025.e7. [PMID: 34508659 PMCID: PMC8500949 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BRCA1/2 mutant tumor cells display an elevated mutation burden, the etiology of which remains unclear. Here, we report that these cells accumulate ssDNA gaps and spontaneous mutations during unperturbed DNA replication due to repriming by the DNA primase-polymerase PRIMPOL. Gap accumulation requires the DNA glycosylase SMUG1 and is exacerbated by depletion of the translesion synthesis (TLS) factor RAD18 or inhibition of the error-prone TLS polymerase complex REV1-Polζ by the small molecule JH-RE-06. JH-RE-06 treatment of BRCA1/2-deficient cells results in reduced mutation rates and PRIMPOL- and SMUG1-dependent loss of viability. Through cellular and animal studies, we demonstrate that JH-RE-06 is preferentially toxic toward HR-deficient cancer cells. Furthermore, JH-RE-06 remains effective toward PARP inhibitor (PARPi)-resistant BRCA1 mutant cells and displays additive toxicity with crosslinking agents or PARPi. Collectively, these studies identify a protective and mutagenic role for REV1-Polζ in BRCA1/2 mutant cells and provide the rationale for using REV1-Polζ inhibitors to treat BRCA1/2 mutant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Taglialatela
- Department of Genetics and Development, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giuseppe Leuzzi
- Department of Genetics and Development, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vincenzo Sannino
- DNA Metabolism Laboratory, IFOM, FIRC Institute for Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Raquel Cuella-Martin
- Department of Genetics and Development, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jen-Wei Huang
- Department of Genetics and Development, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Foon Wu-Baer
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Department of Pathology & Cell Biology, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard Baer
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Department of Pathology & Cell Biology, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vincenzo Costanzo
- DNA Metabolism Laboratory, IFOM, FIRC Institute for Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Ciccia
- Department of Genetics and Development, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Joseph AM, Badrinarayanan A. Visualizing mutagenic repair: novel insights into bacterial translesion synthesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2020; 44:572-582. [PMID: 32556198 PMCID: PMC7476773 DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuaa023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA repair is essential for cell survival. In all domains of life, error-prone and error-free repair pathways ensure maintenance of genome integrity under stress. Mutagenic, low-fidelity repair mechanisms help avoid potential lethality associated with unrepaired damage, thus making them important for genome maintenance and, in some cases, the preferred mode of repair. However, cells carefully regulate pathway choice to restrict activity of these pathways to only certain conditions. One such repair mechanism is translesion synthesis (TLS), where a low-fidelity DNA polymerase is employed to synthesize across a lesion. In bacteria, TLS is a potent source of stress-induced mutagenesis, with potential implications in cellular adaptation as well as antibiotic resistance. Extensive genetic and biochemical studies, predominantly in Escherichia coli, have established a central role for TLS in bypassing bulky DNA lesions associated with ongoing replication, either at or behind the replication fork. More recently, imaging-based approaches have been applied to understand the molecular mechanisms of TLS and how its function is regulated. Together, these studies have highlighted replication-independent roles for TLS as well. In this review, we discuss the current status of research on bacterial TLS, with emphasis on recent insights gained mostly through microscopy at the single-cell and single-molecule level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha Mary Joseph
- National Centre for Biological Sciences (Tata Institute of Fundamental Research), Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
| | - Anjana Badrinarayanan
- National Centre for Biological Sciences (Tata Institute of Fundamental Research), Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nedal A, Ræder SB, Dalhus B, Helgesen E, Forstrøm RJ, Lindland K, Sumabe BK, Martinsen JH, Kragelund BB, Skarstad K, Bjørås M, Otterlei M. Peptides containing the PCNA interacting motif APIM bind to the β-clamp and inhibit bacterial growth and mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:5540-5554. [PMID: 32347931 PMCID: PMC7261172 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In the fight against antimicrobial resistance, the bacterial DNA sliding clamp, β-clamp, is a promising drug target for inhibition of DNA replication and translesion synthesis. The β-clamp and its eukaryotic homolog, PCNA, share a C-terminal hydrophobic pocket where all the DNA polymerases bind. Here we report that cell penetrating peptides containing the PCNA-interacting motif APIM (APIM-peptides) inhibit bacterial growth at low concentrations in vitro, and in vivo in a bacterial skin infection model in mice. Surface plasmon resonance analysis and computer modeling suggest that APIM bind to the hydrophobic pocket on the β-clamp, and accordingly, we find that APIM-peptides inhibit bacterial DNA replication. Interestingly, at sub-lethal concentrations, APIM-peptides have anti-mutagenic activities, and this activity is increased after SOS induction. Our results show that although the sequence homology between the β-clamp and PCNA are modest, the presence of similar polymerase binding pockets in the DNA clamps allows for binding of the eukaryotic binding motif APIM to the bacterial β-clamp. Importantly, because APIM-peptides display both anti-mutagenic and growth inhibitory properties, they may have clinical potential both in combination with other antibiotics and as single agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aina Nedal
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7489 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Synnøve B Ræder
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7489 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Bjørn Dalhus
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, 0424 Oslo, Norway.,Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, and University of Oslo, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emily Helgesen
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7489 Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, and University of Oslo, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rune J Forstrøm
- Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, and University of Oslo, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kim Lindland
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7489 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Balagra K Sumabe
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7489 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Jacob H Martinsen
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Birthe B Kragelund
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Skarstad
- Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, and University of Oslo, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnar Bjørås
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7489 Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, and University of Oslo, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marit Otterlei
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7489 Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A Comprehensive View of Translesion Synthesis in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2020; 84:84/3/e00002-20. [PMID: 32554755 DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00002-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The lesion bypass pathway, translesion synthesis (TLS), exists in essentially all organisms and is considered a pathway for postreplicative gap repair and, at the same time, for lesion tolerance. As with the saying "a trip is not over until you get back home," studying TLS only at the site of the lesion is not enough to understand the whole process of TLS. Recently, a genetic study uncovered that polymerase V (Pol V), a poorly expressed Escherichia coli TLS polymerase, is not only involved in the TLS step per se but also participates in the gap-filling reaction over several hundred nucleotides. The same study revealed that in contrast, Pol IV, another highly expressed TLS polymerase, essentially stays away from the gap-filling reaction. These observations imply fundamentally different ways these polymerases are recruited to DNA in cells. While access of Pol IV appears to be governed by mass action, efficient recruitment of Pol V involves a chaperone-like action of the RecA filament. We present a model of Pol V activation: the 3' tip of the RecA filament initially stabilizes Pol V to allow stable complex formation with a sliding β-clamp, followed by the capture of the terminal RecA monomer by Pol V, thus forming a functional Pol V complex. This activation process likely determines higher accessibility of Pol V than of Pol IV to normal DNA. Finally, we discuss the biological significance of TLS polymerases during gap-filling reactions: error-prone gap-filling synthesis may contribute as a driving force for genetic diversity, adaptive mutation, and evolution.
Collapse
|
7
|
A gatekeeping function of the replicative polymerase controls pathway choice in the resolution of lesion-stalled replisomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116:25591-25601. [PMID: 31796591 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1914485116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA lesions stall the replisome and proper resolution of these obstructions is critical for genome stability. Replisomes can directly replicate past a lesion by error-prone translesion synthesis. Alternatively, replisomes can reprime DNA synthesis downstream of the lesion, creating a single-stranded DNA gap that is repaired primarily in an error-free, homology-directed manner. Here we demonstrate how structural changes within the Escherichia coli replisome determine the resolution pathway of lesion-stalled replisomes. This pathway selection is controlled by a dynamic interaction between the proofreading subunit of the replicative polymerase and the processivity clamp, which sets a kinetic barrier to restrict access of translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases to the primer/template junction. Failure of TLS polymerases to overcome this barrier leads to repriming, which competes kinetically with TLS. Our results demonstrate that independent of its exonuclease activity, the proofreading subunit of the replisome acts as a gatekeeper and influences replication fidelity during the resolution of lesion-stalled replisomes.
Collapse
|