Molecular mechanisms of the RNA polymerases in plant RNA-directed DNA methylation

In plants, two atypical DNA-dependent RNA polymerases, RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) and Pol V, and an RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 (RDR2) together produce noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) to guide the plant-specific RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM). Although both Pol IV and Pol V have evolved from the canonical Pol II, they have adapted to different roles in RdDM. The mechanisms of their adaptation are key to understanding plant DNA methylation and the divergent evolution of polymerases. In this review, we summarize insights that have emerged from recent structural studies of Pol IV, Pol V, and RDR2 and discuss their structural features critical for efficient ncRNA production in RdDM.

Advances of RNA polymerase IV in controlling DNA methylation and development in plants

DNA methylation is a type of stable epigenetic modifications that plays crucial roles in regulating gene expression, silencing transposons and maintaining genome stability. In plants, the de novo DNA methylation is established via a pathway termed as RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM). The plant-specific DNA-dependent RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) as the core protein in RdDM pathway produces non-coding RNAs that direct the establishment of DNA methylation, regulates gene expression and controls plant development. Pol IV function is regulated by several proteins including SHH1, which recognizes H3K9 methylation and guides Pol IV to genome specific sites, the chromatin remodeling factor CLSY family that is involved in assisting Pol IV chromatin association and RDR2 that converts Pol IV produced single-stranded RNA into double-stranded RNA. In this review, we summarize the latest progress on Pol IV and its co-regulators, and focus on their functions in shaping epigenome and development in plants, which might provide implications for studying of DNA methylation and crop breeding.

Assembly of a dsRNA synthesizing complex: RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 contacts the largest subunit of NUCLEAR RNA POLYMERASE IV

Short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) can inhibit mRNA translation or guide chromatin modifications that inhibit transcription, thus impacting gene regulation. In plants, transcriptional gene silencing involves siRNAs whose double-stranded (ds) precursors are generated by the coupled activities of NUCLEAR RNA POLYMERASE IV and RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2. We present evidence that Pol IV-RDR2 association involves contact between RDR2 and NRPD1, Pol IV’s largest catalytic subunit. As the only subunit never shared by Pol II or Pol IV, NRPD1 interaction accounts for RDR2's specific association with Pol IV. The positions of the protein docking sites suggest that Pol IV transcripts are generated in close proximity to RDR2’s catalytic site, enabling RDR2 to efficiently engage Pol IV transcripts and convert them into dsRNAs.

In plants, transcription of selfish genetic elements such as transposons and DNA viruses is suppressed by RNA-directed DNA methylation. This process is guided by 24-nt short-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) whose double-stranded precursors are synthesized by DNA-dependent NUCLEAR RNA POLYMERASE IV (Pol IV) and RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 2 (RDR2). Pol IV and RDR2 coimmunoprecipitate, and their activities are tightly coupled, yet the basis for their association is unknown. Here, we show that an interval near the RDR2 active site contacts the Pol IV catalytic subunit, NRPD1, the largest of Pol IV’s 12 subunits. Contacts between the catalytic regions of the two enzymes suggests that RDR2 is positioned to rapidly engage the free 3′ ends of Pol IV transcripts and convert these single-stranded transcripts into double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs).

Multifaceted roles of RNA polymerase IV in plant growth and development

We discuss the latest findings on RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) in plant growth and development, providing new insights and expanding on new ideas for further, more in-depth research on Pol IV.

A Comprehensive View of Translesion Synthesis in Escherichia coli

The lesion bypass pathway, translesion synthesis (TLS), exists in essentially all organisms and is considered a pathway for postreplicative gap repair and, at the same time, for lesion tolerance. As with the saying "a trip is not over until you get back home," studying TLS only at the site of the lesion is not enough to understand the whole process of TLS. Recently, a genetic study uncovered that polymerase V (Pol V), a poorly expressed Escherichia coli TLS polymerase, is not only involved in the TLS step per se but also participates in the gap-filling reaction over several hundred nucleotides. The same study revealed that in contrast, Pol IV, another highly expressed TLS polymerase, essentially stays away from the gap-filling reaction. These observations imply fundamentally different ways these polymerases are recruited to DNA in cells. While access of Pol IV appears to be governed by mass action, efficient recruitment of Pol V involves a chaperone-like action of the RecA filament. We present a model of Pol V activation: the 3' tip of the RecA filament initially stabilizes Pol V to allow stable complex formation with a sliding β-clamp, followed by the capture of the terminal RecA monomer by Pol V, thus forming a functional Pol V complex. This activation process likely determines higher accessibility of Pol V than of Pol IV to normal DNA. Finally, we discuss the biological significance of TLS polymerases during gap-filling reactions: error-prone gap-filling synthesis may contribute as a driving force for genetic diversity, adaptive mutation, and evolution.

RNA polymerases IV and V influence the 3' boundaries of Polymerase II transcription units in Arabidopsis

Nuclear multisubunit RNA polymerases IV and V (Pol IV and Pol V) evolved in plants as specialized forms of Pol II. Their functions are best understood in the context of RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM), a process in which Pol IV-dependent 24 nt siRNAs direct the de novo cytosine methylation of regions transcribed by Pol V. Pol V has additional functions, independent of Pol IV and 24 nt siRNA biogenesis, in maintaining the repression of transposons and genomic repeats whose silencing depends on maintenance cytosine methylation. Here we report that Pol IV and Pol V play unexpected roles in defining the 3' boundaries of Pol II transcription units. Nuclear run-on assays reveal that in the absence of Pol IV or Pol V, Pol II occupancy downstream of poly A sites increases for approximately 12% of protein-coding genes. This effect is most pronounced for convergently transcribed gene pairs. Although Pols IV and V are detected near transcript ends of the affected Pol II - transcribed genes, their role in limiting Pol II read-through is independent of siRNA biogenesis or cytosine methylation for the majority of these genes. Interestingly, we observed that splicing was less efficient in pol IV or pol V mutant plants, compared to wild-type plants, suggesting that Pol IV or Pol V might affect pre-mRNA processing. We speculate that Pols IV and V (and/or their associated factors) play roles in Pol II transcription termination and pre-mRNA splicing by influencing polymerase elongation rates and/or release at collision sites for convergent genes.

Step-wise and lineage-specific diversification of plant RNA polymerase genes and origin of the largest plant-specific subunits

Proteins often function as complexes, yet little is known about the evolution of dissimilar subunits of complexes. DNA-directed RNA polymerases (RNAPs) are multisubunit complexes, with distinct eukaryotic types for different classes of transcripts. In addition to Pol I-III, common in eukaryotes, plants have Pol IV and V for epigenetic regulation. Some RNAP subunits are specific to one type, whereas other subunits are shared by multiple types. We have conducted extensive phylogenetic and sequence analyses, and have placed RNAP gene duplication events in land plant history, thereby reconstructing the subunit compositions of the novel RNAPs during land plant evolution. We found that Pol IV/V have experienced step-wise duplication and diversification of various subunits, with increasingly distinctive subunit compositions. Also, lineage-specific duplications have further increased RNAP complexity with distinct copies in different plant families and varying divergence for subunits of different RNAPs. Further, the largest subunits of Pol IV/V probably originated from a gene fusion in the ancestral land plants. We propose a framework of plant RNAP evolution, providing an excellent model for protein complex evolution.

Non-coding RNA transcription and RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis

RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) is responsible for transcriptional silencing of endogenous transposable elements and introduced transgenes. This process requires non-coding RNAs produced by DNA-dependent RNA polymerases IV and V (Pol IV and Pol V). Pol IV-produced non-coding RNAs are precursors of 24-nt small interfering RNAs, whereas Pol V-produced ncRNAs directly act as scaffold RNAs. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the understanding of RdDM. In particular, we focus on the mechanisms underlying the recruitment of Pol IV and Pol V to chromatin and the targeting of RdDM.

Emerging roles of RNA processing factors in regulating long non-coding RNAs

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) can be important regulators of various biological processes such as RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM). In the RdDM pathway, recruitment of the DNA methylation complex is mediated through complementary pairing between scaffold RNAs and Argonaute-associated siRNAs. Scaffold RNAs are chromatin-associated lncRNAs transcribed by RNA polymerase Pol V or Pol II, while siRNAs originate from Pol IV- or Pol II-dependent production of lncRNAs. In contrast to the vast literature on co-transcriptional and post-transcriptional processing of mRNAs, information is limited for lncRNA regulation that enables their production and function. Recently Arabidopsis RRP6L1, a plant paralog of the conserved nuclear RNA surveillance protein Rrp6, was shown to mediate RdDM through retention of lncRNAs in the chromatin, thereby revealing that accumulation of functional lncRNAs requires more than simply RNA polymerases. By focusing on the canonical RdDM pathway, here we summarize recent evidence that indicate co-transcriptional and/or post-transcriptional regulation of lncRNAs, and highlight the emerging theme of lncRNA regulation by RNA processing factors.

Distinct and concurrent pathways of Pol II- and Pol IV-dependent siRNA biogenesis at a repetitive trans-silencer locus in Arabidopsis thaliana

Short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) homologous to transcriptional regulatory regions can induce RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) and transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) of target genes. In our system, siRNAs are produced by transcribing an inverted DNA repeat (IR) of enhancer sequences, yielding a hairpin RNA that is processed by several Dicer activities into siRNAs of 21-24 nt. Primarily 24-nt siRNAs trigger RdDM of the target enhancer in trans and TGS of a downstream GFP reporter gene. We analyzed siRNA accumulation from two different structural forms of a trans-silencer locus in which tandem repeats are embedded in the enhancer IR and distinguished distinct RNA polymerase II (Pol II)- and Pol IV-dependent pathways of siRNA biogenesis. At the original silencer locus, Pol-II transcription of the IR from a 35S promoter produces a hairpin RNA that is diced into abundant siRNAs of 21-24 nt. A silencer variant lacking the 35S promoter revealed a normally masked Pol IV-dependent pathway that produces low levels of 24-nt siRNAs from the tandem repeats. Both pathways operate concurrently at the original silencer locus. siRNAs accrue only from specific regions of the enhancer and embedded tandem repeat. Analysis of these sequences and endogenous tandem repeats producing siRNAs revealed the preferential accumulation of siRNAs at GC-rich regions containing methylated CG dinucleotides. In addition to supporting a correlation between base composition, DNA methylation and siRNA accumulation, our results highlight the complexity of siRNA biogenesis at repetitive loci and show that Pol II and Pol IV use different promoters to transcribe the same template.

Noncoding RNAs and DNA Methylation in Plants

Cytosine DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification in eukaryotes that maintains genome integrity and regulates gene expression. The DNA methylation patterns in plants are more complex than those in animals, and plants and animals have common as well as distinct pathways in regulating DNA methylation. Recent studies involving genetic, molecular, biochemical and genomic approaches have greatly expanded our knowledge of DNA methylation in plants. The roles of many proteins as well as non-coding RNAs in DNA methylation have been uncovered.

Protocol: a beginner's guide to the analysis of RNA-directed DNA methylation in plants

BACKGROUND

DNA methylation is a conserved epigenetic mark that controls genome stability, development and environmental responses in many eukaryotes. DNA methylation can be guided by non-coding RNAs that include small interfering RNAs and scaffold RNAs. Although measurement of DNA methylation and regulatory non-coding RNAs is desirable for many biologists who are interested in exploring epigenetic regulation in their areas, conventional methods have limitations and are technically challenging. For instance, traditional siRNA detection through RNA hybridization requires relatively large amount of small RNAs and involves radioactive isotopes. An alternative approach is RT-qPCR that employs stem loop primers during reverse transcription; however, it requires a prerequisite that the exact sequences of siRNAs should be known.

RESULTS

By using the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana, we developed an easy-to-follow, integrative procedure for time-efficient, quantitative measurement of DNA methylation, small interfering RNAs, and scaffold RNAs. Starting with simplified nucleic acid manipulation, we examined DNA methylation levels by using Chop PCR (methylation-sensitive enzyme digestion followed by PCR), which allowed for fast screening for DNA methylation mutants without the need of transgenic reporters. We deployed a simple bioinformatics method for mining published small RNA databases, in order to obtain the nucleotide (nt) sequences of individual 24nt siRNAs within the regions of interest. The protocol of commercial TaqMan Small RNA Assay was subsequently optimized for reliable quantitative detection of individual siRNAs. We used nested qPCR to quantify scaffold RNAs that are of low abundance and without Poly-A tails. In addition, nuclei fraction enables separation of chromatin-associated scaffold RNAs from their cognate non-scaffold transcripts that have been released from chromatin.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a procedure for quantitative investigations on nucleic acids that are core components of RNA-directed DNA methylation. Our results not only demonstrated the efficacy of this procedure, but also provide lists of methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes, novel DNA methylation marker loci, and related siRNA sequences, all of which can be valuable for future epigenetic studies. Importantly, step-by-step protocols are provided in details such that the approaches can be easily followed by biologists with little experience in epigenetics.