Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy and its effect on outcome: A retrospective observational study

Characteristics and factors associated with mortality in tracheostomized patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study in a hospital in Tacna, Peru

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe the main demographic, clinical, laboratory and therapeutic characteristics and to identify whether they are associated with mortality in tracheostomized patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS.

Retrospective cohort study in adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19, admitted to ICU (Intensive Care Unit) and requiring tracheostomy. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and treatment data were obtained from the medical records of patients admitted to Hospital III Daniel Alcides Carrión in Tacna. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for survival analysis and hazard ratios (HR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated.

RESULTS.

We evaluated 73 patients, 72.6% were men, the most common comorbidities were obesity (68.5%), type 2 diabetes mellitus (35.6%), and arterial hypertension (34.2%). Thirty-seven percent of the participants died during their stay at the ICU. The median time from intubation to tracheostomy and the duration of tracheostomy was 17 (RIC: 15-21) and 21 (RIC: 3-39) days, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the factors associated with mortality were procalcitonin > 0.50 ng/dL at the time of tracheostomy (HRa: 2.40 95%CI: 1.03-5.59) and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 150 mmHg (HRa: 4.44 95%CI: 1.56-12.60).

CONCLUSIONS.

The factors associated with mortality at the time of tracheostomy were procalcitonin > 0.50 ng/dL and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio less than or equal to 150 mmHg.

The Effect of Comorbidities and Complications on COVID-19 Mortality: A Detailed Retrospective Study in Western Romania

COVID-19 continues to impact global health systems even after being declared over, with some patients exhibiting severe complications linked to pre-existing conditions. This study aimed to investigate the association between comorbidities, complications, and survival outcomes among COVID-19 survivors in Western Romania. Our hypothesis posited that comorbidities and complications significantly influence survival rates. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1948 COVID-19 survivors admitted from January to December 2021, with 192 selected for detailed analysis based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The severity of COVID-19 was classified according to WHO guidelines, and conditions like hypertension and obesity were defined using criteria from the European Society of Hypertension (ESH), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and WHO, respectively. Among the 192 patients, 33 had mild, 62 had moderate, and 97 had severe COVID-19. The median age across the severity groups was 63.2 years. Patients undergoing tracheostomy had a mortality rate of 83.3% versus 22.2% for non-tracheostomy patients (p < 0.001) and presented with significantly higher lung injury, hospitalization duration, and complications. Remarkably, tracheostomized patients were 17.50 times more likely to succumb to the disease (95% CI 4.39-116.91, p < 0.001). Furthermore, pneumothorax increased the mortality risk significantly (OR 22.11, 95% CI 5.72-146.03, p < 0.001). Intriguingly, certain conditions like grade I hypertension and grade II obesity showed a protective effect against mortality, whereas type 2 diabetes mellitus increased mortality risk (univariate OR 2.89, p = 0.001). The presence of certain comorbidities and complications significantly impacts the survival rates of COVID-19 patients in Western Romania. Notably, tracheostomy, pneumothorax, and T2DM were associated with increased mortality. This study underscores the importance of personalized patient care and provides insights for healthcare policymakers in Western Romania to improve clinical management strategies.

Effectiveness of interprofessional tracheostomy teams: A systematic review

AIM(S)

To systematically locate, evaluate and synthesize evidence regarding effectiveness of interprofessional tracheostomy teams in increasing speaking valve use and decreasing time to speech and decannulation, adverse events, lengths of stay (intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital) and mortality. In addition, to evaluate facilitators and barriers to implementing an interprofessional tracheostomy team in hospital settings.

DESIGN

Systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model's guidance.

METHODS

Our clinical question: Do interprofessional tracheostomy teams increase speaking valve use and decrease time to speech and decannulation, adverse events, lengths of stay and mortality? Primary studies involving adult patients with a tracheostomy were included. Eligible studies were systematically reviewed by two reviewers and verified by another two reviewers.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies met eligibility criteria; primarily pre-post intervention cohort studies. Percent increase in speaking valve use ranged 14%-275%; percent reduction in median days to speech ranged 33%-73% and median days to decannulation ranged 26%-32%; percent reduction in rate of adverse events ranged 32%-88%; percent reduction in median hospital length of stay days ranged 18-40 days; no significant change in overall ICU length of stay and mortality rates. Facilitators include team education, coverage, rounds, standardization, communication, lead personnel and automation, patient tracking; barrier is financial.

CONCLUSION

Patients with tracheostomy who received care from a dedicated interprofessional team showed improvements in several clinical outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE

Additional high-quality evidence from rigorous, well-controlled and adequately powered studies are necessary, as are implementation strategies to promote broader adoption of interprofessional tracheostomy team strategies. Interprofessional tracheostomy teams are associated with improved safety and quality of care.

IMPACT

Evidence from review provides rationale for broader implementation of interprofessional tracheostomy teams.

REPORTING METHOD

PRISMA and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM).

PATIENT/PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

None.