Clinical audit, a valuable tool to improve quality of care: General methodology and applications in nephrology

A Quality Improvement Intervention to Enhance Documentation on Histopathology Request Forms

Introduction Incomplete histopathology request form documentation can compromise diagnostic accuracy and delay patient management. This study aimed to assess and improve documentation completeness using a structured quality improvement approach. Methods A clinical audit was conducted at a tertiary care hospital using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. In the first audit cycle, 250 histopathology request forms were reviewed for completeness. Based on the findings, targeted interventions were implemented, including a standardized request form, clinician engagement, and improved accessibility to forms. A second audit cycle assessed 150 forms to evaluate the impact of these interventions. Results Significant improvements were observed across all documentation parameters. Clinical history documentation increased from 0% to 62%, while presenting complaints improved from 3.2% to 73%. Physical examination findings were recorded in 96% of cases compared to 73.6% initially, and radiological findings improved from 44.4% to 95%. Laboratory investigation results increased from 41.2% to 81%, while drug/medication history documentation rose from 6% to 48%. Specimen details also showed improvement, with biopsy time documentation increasing from 3.2% to 66% and provisional diagnosis documentation rising from 49.2% to 78%. Conclusion A structured quality improvement approach led to significant enhancements in documentation completeness. Ongoing audits, clinician training, and digital solutions are recommended for sustaining these improvements.

DEKODE-A cloud-based performance feedback model improved DKA care across multiple hospitals in the UK

AIM

A current gap in Diabetes-related ketoacidosis (DKA) research is understanding the factors contributing to variations in care and outcomes between people admitted with DKA. We aimed to create a system to facilitate gathering data on DKA management across multiple centres and identify trends in complications and outcomes associated with DKA.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Between January 2020 and December 2022, we set up a cloud-based Quality improvement project (QIP) that provided regular feedback to 11 hospitals in the United Kingdom (UK).

RESULTS

Of the 1977 episodes, we observed an increase in adherence in fluid prescription in hospitals C, D, E, F and G (C- 23% vs. 75% p = <0.001; D- 27% vs. 60%, p = <0.001; E- 17 vs. 79% p = <0.001; F- 16% vs. 57%, p = <0.001; G- 36% vs. 75% p = <0.001). Notable improvements in adherence to glucose monitoring were observed in hospitals B, D, and G (B- 11 vs. 38% p = <0.001; D- 36% vs. 56%, p = 0.05; G- 22% vs. 67% p = <0.001). Although we didn't observe significant changes in complications and outcomes among participating hospitals from the start to the end of the reported period, notable fluctuations were evident across quarters. These variations were relayed to the respective hospitals, underscoring how feedback and interventions could influence the care provided. This initiative also marks the initial move towards establishing and improving data collection practices in acute diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate a sustainable QIP that improves adherence to national guidelines in some indicators for DKA care and serves as an early warning system to identify adverse trends.

Implementation of a National Antimicrobial Stewardship Training Programme for General Practice: A Case Study

BACKGROUND

Approximately 71% of antibiotics in England are prescribed in general practice settings. Whilst there are various impactful training resources available to support clinicians in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities, implementation, reach, and uptake affect how successful they are nationally. This case study explores the feasibility, acceptability, and usefulness of embedding the TARGET (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly, Guidance, Education and Tools) AMS training into a local incentive scheme.

METHOD

Black Country Integrated Care Board (ICB) invited a representative from all associated general practises to a TARGET AMS training event; attendance was linked to a local incentive scheme. Data were collected via a pre- and post-workshop survey capturing TARGET toolkit knowledge, AMS attitudes and behaviours, training feedback, and intention to implement AMS behaviours. Descriptive analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

157 and 101 attendees completed the pre- and post-session surveys, respectively. In total, 89% agreed that attending the session was a good use of their time. The proportions of attendees stating an intention to use the TARGET toolkit and implement a range of AMS strategies following the session were high (TARGET Toolkit: >82%, AMS strategies: >90%). Most attendees planned to implement these actions within 3 months (47%) or within 3-6 months (30%).

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that embedding the training into a local incentive scheme is a viable implementation approach in extending training reach. Although the impact on prescribing rates is not yet available, the high engagement and intention to implement AMS strategies observed should inspire confidence in this approach to training implementation.

Enhancing patient safety and risk management through clinical pathways in oncology

The increasing emphasis on risk management and quality assessment in hospital management necessitates strict adherence to government and international standards. Those standards are particularly important, and certification requirements further underscore this need. The objective of this paper is to outline the application of the INTegrated Audit Model in a Comprehensive Cancer Center. This model represents a revised version of Tracer Methodology, for audit surveys, aimed at aligning audit activities with UNI EN ISO 9001:2015 and Joint Commission Standards for quality, patient safety and clinical risk management.Using the INTegrated Audit Model, a total of 7 tracers were conducted, and 31 units underwent auditing during the period spanning from 2022 to 2023. Each audit inquiry was documented, categorised and cross-referenced with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and Joint Commission International (JCI) standards. Areas exhibiting the highest incidence of non-conformities and observations were systematically linked to relevant standards. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis was conducted on the ensuing findings.The INTegrated Audit Model allowed for systematic data collection across clinical pathways, revealing prevalent issues and areas for improvement in patient care. By aligning identified topics with ISO and JCI standards, compliance with international guidelines was assessed, offering units insight into their current status and areas for enhancement.Overall, both auditees and auditors expressed satisfaction with the methodology and continuous training, highlighting its effectiveness in fostering collaboration, improving time management and promoting adherence to accreditation standards.The study highlights the effectiveness of the methodology in monitoring unit activities and adherence to clinical pathways and international standards applied to an oncological setting. Audits conducted with this approach provided a thorough assessment of critical areas impacting patient care and clinical governance, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of service delivery.

Theory-informed refinement and tailored implementation of a quality improvement program in maternity care to reduce unwarranted clinical variation across a health service network

BACKGROUND

Unwarranted clinical variation presents a major challenge in contemporary healthcare, indicating potential inequalities and inefficiencies, and unrealised potential for better outcomes. Despite an increasing focus on unwarranted clinical variation, and consideration of efforts to address this challenge, evidence-based strategies which achieve this are limited. Audit and feedback of healthcare processes (process auditing) and clinician engagement are important tools which may help to reduce unwarranted clinical variation, however their application in maternity care is yet to be thoroughly explored. We describe the development and implementation of a program to address unwarranted clinical variation across a multi-site maternity network termed Practice Improvement with Clinicians eNgaged in Improving Care (PICNIC). The goals of the program were to engage clinicians to identify and reduce unwarranted clinical variation and enhance the delivery of evidence-based care, with the intention of improving care quality, clinical outcomes, and efficiency of the health service.

METHODS

A theory-informed approach was used to design and implement the four-phase program, underpinned by implementation science and quality improvement methodologies. It utilised clinician-performed process auditing, built upon existing evidence for audit and feedback, and employed evidence-based implementation strategies to promote clinician behaviour change.

RESULTS

The intervention was implemented across the five maternity network sites in 2020 with around 300 clinicians participating in 18 audit topics over four years (2020-2023). A diverse array of evidence-based strategies were utilised to support implementation over this period and are mapped to the Behaviour Change Taxonomy and Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation. Observed benefits of the program include the development and implementation of clinician co-designed system-level improvements that are tailored to context, to improve the delivery of best-practice healthcare and improve outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation science theory and quality improvement processes can be integrated pragmatically to engage clinicians to address unwarranted clinical variation, with the objective of creating meaningful behaviour change, and system-level improvements for better healthcare outcomes. The replicability of this approach in other disciplines and hospital networks should be explored.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable to this report.

Benchmarks for low back pain in general practice in Flanders: electronic audit of INTEGO

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequent reasons for encounter in general practice. Yet results from literature show adherence to clinical practice guidelines is low. Audit & feedback is a well-known strategy to improve adherence to guidelines. Benchmarking is an important step in the audit & feedback process. The objective of this study was to develop data-derived benchmarks for low back pain quality indicators.

METHODS

Four electronic health record extractable quality indicators were selected from an existing indicator set developed by CEBAM, an independent, multidisciplinary and interuniversity medical scientific institute in Belgium. Data from 2021-2022 from INTEGO, a general practice morbidity registry, were used to calculate benchmarks for the four quality indicators. The Achievable Benchmark of Care methodology was used to create benchmarks based on the performance of the 10% best-performing practices.

RESULTS

The following benchmarks were derived: 4.2% prescription for medical imaging, 12.7% prescription for opioids, 27.2% for prescription for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen, 37.7% prescription for physical therapy and 11.9% prescription for work absenteeism.

CONCLUSIONS

Benchmarks for four electronic health record-extractable quality indicators have been established. They can be used for an electronic audit & feedback tool in primary practice in Flanders or other quality improvement initiatives.

Internal Audit of an Oral Pathology Laboratory: Perspectives on Finances and Operational Management

Background Internal audits are essential tools for enhancing the operational efficiency, quality, and effectiveness of healthcare departments. Audits enable the departments and laboratories to meet the changing needs of the healthcare environment by giving a detailed picture of the department's operations and highlighting areas for possible growth and development. Aims and objectives This study focuses on the biopsies received in the Oral Pathology Department at Saveetha Dental College, aiming to evaluate biopsy trends, financial performance, and resource utilization over one year. Materials and methods The oral pathology department audit covered the period from 1st April 2023 to 31st March 2024. The institutional human ethical committee and scientific review board approved the retrospective audit. It involved a comprehensive analysis of biopsy data, financial records, and material usage. Data on different biopsy types (excisional, incisional, frozen sections), immunohistochemistry, cytology, and special stains were collected and analyzed across four quarters. Financial performance was assessed by comparing total income and expenses, while resource utilization was examined through the use of histopathological blocks and other consumables. Statistical analysis (chi-square) was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results We received 1100 cases during the study period. Excisional biopsies were the most common, with 474 (43.09%) cases, followed by incisional biopsies with a total of 432 (39.27%). Out of total cases of 1100, the second quarter (July-September 2023) had the highest case volume of 305 (27.72%), while the third quarter (October-December 2023) recorded the lowest of 250 (22.72%) cases. A financial audit revealed an annual deficit of ₹1,03,321 primarily due to higher expenses towards laboratory reagents. The overall expense incurred per case was ₹448.5. Tissue blocks cost ₹85.23 per case (19.00%) of the average cost per case. The chi-square test analysis was insignificant among the different types of biopsies and the reagent consumption across the four quarters.  Conclusion The audit identified critical areas for improvement in both clinical workload and financial management. High volumes of biopsies, but net financial deficits highlight the need for better cost management and resource utilization strategies to maintain sustainability without compromising diagnostic quality.

Healthcare transition practices of occupational therapists in South African public healthcare

Background

Healthcare transition (HCT), the process of transitioning an adolescent from paediatric- to adult-oriented care, is vital for improving the long-term health of adolescents with chronic conditions. The role of occupational therapy in HCT has not been well-researched. Effective HCT practices are necessary to ensure that adolescents have access to coordinated, optimal and uninterrupted occupational therapy services throughout this period of development.

Objectives

This study describes occupational therapists' self-perceived knowledge of HCT within the context of South African public health facilities, the HCT practices used, and the factors that promote or hinder the success of HCT within this context.

Method

The study utilised a quantitative, non-experimental and descriptive cross-sectional design. Simple convenience and snowball sampling were used to recruit participants via professional databases and social media forums. An online survey was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics and simple content analysis were used to analyse the information.

Results

This study identifies limitations in the knowledge and practical implementation of HCT within South African occupational therapy practice. Healthcare transition is characterised by inadequate use of policies, insufficient transition preparation and poor outcome measurements.

Conclusion

There is a need for the development of training programmes and practice guidelines to optimise and support HCT implementation within South African occupational therapy practice.

Contribution

This study provides novel data on HCT practices utilised by occupational therapists in South African public health facilities. This study has potential use for the development of effective HCT programmes that can improve the functional outcomes of South African adolescents.

Is It Still Time for Safety Walkaround? Pilot Project Proposing a New Model and a Review of the Methodology

Background and Objectives: Healthcare facilities are complex systems due to the interaction between different factors (human, environmental, management, and technological). As complexity increases, it is known that the possibility of error increases; therefore, it becomes essential to be able to analyze the processes that occur within these contexts to prevent their occurrence, which is the task of risk management. For this purpose, in this feasibility study, we chose to evaluate the application of a new safety walkaround (SWA) model. Materials and Methods: A multidisciplinary working group made up of experts was established and then the subsequent phases of the activity were divided into three stages, namely the initial meeting, the operational phase, and the final meeting, to investigate knowledge regarding patient safety before and subsequently through visits to the department: the correct compilation of the medical record, adherence to evidence-based medicine (EBM) practices, the overall health and the degree of burnout of the various healthcare professionals, as well as the perception of empathy of staff by patients. Results: This working group chose to start this pilot project in the vascular surgery ward, demonstrating the ability of the tool used to capture the different aspects it set out to collect. In detail, the new version of SWA proposed in this work has made it possible to identify risk situations and system vulnerabilities that have allowed the introduction of corrective tools; detect adherence to existing company procedures, reschedule training on these specific topics after reviewing, and possibly update the same procedures; record the patient experience about the doctor-patient relationship and communication to hypothesize thematic courses on the subject; evaluate workers' perception of their health conditions about work, and above all reassure operators that their well-being is in the interest of the management of the healthcare company, which is maintained. Conclusions: Therefore, the outcome of the present study demonstrates the versatility and ever-present usefulness of the SWA tool.

Evaluating supply chain management of SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care (POC) diagnostic services in primary healthcare clinics in Mopani District, Limpopo Province, South Africa

Access to point-of-care (POC) diagnostics in resource-limited settings, where laboratory-based diagnostics are limited, depends on efficient supply chain management (SCM). This study evaluated the SCM for SARS-CoV-2 POC diagnostic services in resource-limited settings to determine the effect of SCM on accessibility to SARS-CoV-2 POC tests and to identify barriers and enablers of accessibility to SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic services in Mopani District, Limpopo Province, South Africa. We purposively assessed 47 clinics providing POC diagnostic services between June and September 2022. One participant per clinic completed an audit tool developed by the authors with guidance from the World Health Organization and the Management Sciences for Health guidelines. The audit tool evaluated the following SCM parameters: selection, quantification, storage, procurement, quality assurance, distribution, redistribution, inventory management, and human resource capacity. Percentage rating scores between 90-100% indicated that the facility was compliant with SCM guidelines, while rating scores < 90% indicated non-compliance. The clinic audit scores were summarized and compared across clinics and sub-districts. Clinics had compliance scores ranging from 60.5% to 89.2%. Compliance scores were the highest for procurement, redistribution, and quality assurance (all 100%), followed by storage (mean = 95.2%, 95% CI: 90.7-99.7), quantification (mean = 89.4%, 95% CI: 80.2-98.5), and selection (mean = 87.5%, 95% CI: 87.5%-87.5%). Compliance scores were the lowest for inventory management (mean = 53.2%, 95% CI: 47.9%-58.5%), distribution (mean = 48.6%, 95% CI: 44.6%-52.7%), and human resource capacity (mean = 50.6%, 95% CI: 43.3%-58.0%). A significant correlation was found between compliance score and clinic headcount (r = 0.4, p = 0.008), and compliance score and ideal clinic score (r = 0.4, p = 0.0003). Overall, the 47 clinics audited did not comply with international SCM guidelines. Of the nine SCM parameters evaluated, only procurement, redistribution, and quality assurance did not need improvement. All parameters are key in ensuring full functionality of SCM systems and equitable access to SARS-CoV-2 POC diagnostics in resource limited settings.

Applying clinical audit for quality improvement in canine dystocia cases seen at a UK primary-care emergency practice

BACKGROUND

The paucity of published veterinary clinical audits suggests that clinical audit is an under-used tool for quality improvement (QI) in the veterinary profession. Therefore, a continuous QI process was designed and implemented at a UK multisite small animal emergency practice, focusing on audit of clinical management of canine dystocia.

METHODS

Data collection phases were undertaken in 2014, 2019 and 2021, with intervening knowledge dissemination activities. Nine variables relating to clinical management of canine dystocia were selected as audit criteria in the initial dataset, and 21 variables were measured in each subsequent phase.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2021, statistically significant increases (p < 0.05) were demonstrated in recording of bodyweight, use of diagnostic imaging, use of ultrasonography, recording of fetal heart rates, use of calcium gluconate, and use during caesarean section of intravenous fluid therapy, multimodal analgesia, full agonist opioids, paracetamol and local anaesthesia. Statistically significant decreases were demonstrated in median first quantity and median first dose of oxytocin, and in the use of NSAIDs during caesarean section. A clinical audit planning template was created for future audits.

LIMITATIONS

Typical case presentation and management of canine dystocia cases may vary between dedicated emergency and non-emergency primary-care settings.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the feasibility of large-scale veterinary clinical audit and suggests that the application of the clinical audit process promotes learning within the veterinary team and improved clinical outcomes.

Nutrition nurse-led outpatient 'hot' clinics are efficient and cost-effective: a retrospective single-centre evaluation

BACKGROUND

Nutrition nurses work in multidisciplinary and nurse-led outpatient clinics. The daily nutrition nurse-led 'hot' clinic in this study sees patients for enteral or home parenteral nutritional support. Appointments may be for routine procedures or emergency reviews.

AIMS

This study aimed to identify activities and procedures performed in the nutrition nurse-led clinic, identifying admission avoidance activity.

METHODS

Nurse-held records for the period from April 2018 to March 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Data were collated in an Excel spreadsheet for analysis and results are presented using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Records covered a total of 590 patients, 294 men and 296 women with a median age of 59 years, and 606 procedures. Key activities were troubleshooting enteral feeding tubes (29%), insertion of fine-bore nasogastric feeding tubes (18%) and management of home parenteral nutrition issues (11%). The presenting problem or issue was resolved in 90% of patients, with no need for hospital admission or additional medical review.

CONCLUSION

The nutrition nurse-led clinic provides an efficient and cost-effective service, preventing hospital admission and emergency department attendance in most cases.

Oral candidiasis in a specialist palliative care unit: assessment, diagnosis, management

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate current clinical practices of assessment, diagnosis and management of oral candidiasis in a specialist palliative care unit to improve patient outcomes through compliance with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard.

METHODS

A clinical audit cycle: review of 100 patient records preceded an educational intervention delivered over 4 weeks to clinical stakeholders, followed by a review of an additional 100 records.

RESULTS

Eleven patients in each cohort had oral candidiasis. A statistically significant improvement in documented rates of oral examination (33% to 51%, p=0.015) and appropriate microbiological testing (0% to 63.6%, p=0.004) was achieved. Documentation of oral symptoms and prescribing practices were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Meaningful changes in practice relating to oral assessment and diagnosis of oral candidiasis are possible. Future iterations of the audit cycle may benefit from multimodal interventions to encourage further practice change.

JBI's approach to evidence implementation: a 7-phase process model to support and guide getting evidence into practice

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we provide an overview of JBI's approach to evidence implementation and describe the supporting process model that aligns with this approach. The central tenets of JBI's approach to implementing evidence into practice include the use of evidence-based audit and feedback, identification of the context in which evidence is being implemented, facilitation of any change, and an evaluation process. A pragmatic and practical seven-phased approach is outlined to assist with the 'planning' and 'doing' of getting evidence into practice, focusing on clinicians as change agents for implementing evidence in clinical and policy settings. Further research and development is required to formally evaluate the robustness of the approach to better understand the complex nature of evidence implementation.

Methods for developing quality indicators for evidence implementation: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this scoping review is to locate, identify, and understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to the development of quality indicators within evidence implementation health care programs.

INTRODUCTION

Health care organizations evaluate care using quality improvement initiatives, which are based on quality indicators that are clearly defined and measure what they are intended to, based on structures, processes, or outcomes of care. However, the development of quality indicators is an area plagued by inconsistency and issues in terms of their pragmatic use in the health care context. Inconsistency when using terminology related to quality improvement has highlighted issues with distinct definitions, and many terms appear to be used interchangeably. This leads to confusion and a lack of clarity in what these terms are actually describing with regard to measures of quality in health care.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The proposed review will consider studies, guidelines, manuals, evidence syntheses, and other relevant literature that examine the key concepts, terms, or definitions used in the development of quality indicators and that identify the methods or frameworks used in the development approaches across the international health care setting.

METHODS

The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished documents, using a 3-step search strategy. Results of the search, study inclusion, data extraction, and analysis and presentation of results will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers, in accordance with JBI's methodology for conducting scoping reviews.Findings will be presented in tables or visual charts, accompanied by a narrative summary.

DETAILS OF THIS REVIEW PROJECT ARE AVAILABLE AT

Open Science Framework https://osf.io/54q8j.

Management of Dental Patients With Mental Health Problems in Special Care Dentistry: A Practical Algorithm

Introduction Individuals with mental health problems have poor oral health affecting their quality of life with an increased burden on their well-being. Dentists find treating them challenging due to a lack of training and awareness in modifications of dental care delivery in special needs patients. Also, polypharmacy is common in psychiatric care, further complicating dental care while prescribing routine medications as potential drug interactions must be considered.  Methods Due to a lack of clinical practice guidelines in the literature and the absence of guidelines issued by dental governing bodies, we attempted to consolidate the existing challenges and propose a model for managing psychiatric special needs patients. Results and discussion Based on the current evidence, we hereby recommend 'psychiatric dental consultation liaison' (PDCL) services as the acceptable framework for the management of dental patients with mental health problems in special care dentistry. Conclusion PDCL services will favour both dentists and patients as it includes psychiatric consultation and interventions that will result in the positive execution of comprehensive dental treatment care.

Status of patient safety in selected Ghanaian hospitals: a national cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Safety is one of the dimensions of healthcare quality and is core to achieving universal health coverage and healthcare delivery worldwide. In Ghana, the status of patient safety in the last 7 years has remained unknown. Therefore, this study aims to assess the patient safety status in selected hospitals in Ghana.

METHODS

Using the WHO Patient Safety Long Form, a mixed methodology was used to assess the patient safety status in 27 hospitals in Ghana. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and axial codes for thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The average national patient safety score was high (85%). However, there were variations in the performance of the hospitals across the WHO patient safety action areas. Knowledge and learning in patient safety (97%) was the highest-rated patient safety action area. Patient safety surveillance, patient safety funding, patient safety partnerships and national patient safety policy had mean scores lower than the national average score (85%). Less than half (42%) of the hospitals had a dedicated budget for patient safety activities. The means of continuous education for health professionals include clinical sessions, and in-service training, while the system of clinical audits in the hospitals were maternal mortality, perinatal mortality, stillbirth and general mortality audits. The hospitals use posters, leaflets, public address systems and health education sessions to inform patients about their rights. Patient safety issues are reported through suggestion boxes, designated desks and the use of contacts of core management staff.

CONCLUSION

The current patient safety status in the hospitals was generally good, with the highest score in the knowledge and learning in the patient safety domain. Patient safety surveillance was identified as the weakest action area. The findings of this study will form the scientific basis for initiating the development of a national patient safety policy in Ghana. This is crucial for ensuring resilient and sustainable health systems that guarantee safer care to all patients in Ghana.

The use of leg elevation in the treatment of chronic peripheral oedema

Chronic peripheral oedema is a common long-term condition, with conflicting evidence on how it is best managed. It is crucial to establish the cause of the oedema to decide on the most appropriate intervention for its management. If the oedema is not managed, it can lead to unwanted complications for the service user. The District Nurse (DN) is pivotal in the management of patients with long-term conditions, both directly and indirectly. It is important that a multi-disciplinary approach is used, although nurses are now more autonomous due to advances in practice. The present study focuses on leg elevation as a form of intervention in the treatment of chronic peripheral oedema. As with any intervention, there are some risks with leg elevation that must be considered. This should be disseminated and monitored effectively.

Validation of the McIntyre Audit Tool to measure haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators

BACKGROUND

Nurse sensitive indicators measure the quality of nursing care. Although there are some haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators, there are currently no validated audit tools available to measure the indicators.

OBJECTIVES

To test the validity of the McIntyre Audit Tool.

DESIGN

This study used a descriptive observation design conducted over two phases to assess face and content validity.

PARTICIPANTS

An expert panel of haemodialysis nurses (n = 13).

METHODS

Face validity (phase 1) involved 13 nurses in two focus groups who reviewed the audit tool with qualitative data generated analysed to identify common themes. Phase 2 used a modified version of the audit tool to test for content validity for each item and then scale level content validity was calculated by combining all item scores.

MEASUREMENTS

Ten nurses rated 26 indicators in the audit tool using a 4-point Likert scale to assess each item for clarity, relevance, appropriateness, and ambiguity.

RESULTS

All 26-haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators achieved item content validity indices ranging from 0.825 to 1.00 with a scale content validity index average of 0.910. However, based on feedback from phase 2, 6 outcome indicators were removed from the audit tool to reduce staff burden and assist with ease of use. The final audit tool had an excellent average scale content validity index of 0.924.

CONCLUSIONS

The McIntyre Audit Tool to measure 20 haemodialysis nurse sensitive indicators has been validated. It now requires feasibility and reliability testing before auditing the quality of haemodialysis nursing care.

Key Learning Statements for persistent pain education: an iterative analysis of consumer, clinician and researcher perspectives and development of public messaging

Over the last decade, the content, delivery and media of pain education have been adjusted in line with scientific discovery in pain and educational sciences, and in line with consumer perspectives. This paper describes a decade-long process of exploring consumer perspectives on pain science education concepts to inform clinician-derived educational updates (undertaken by the authors). Data were collected as part of a quality audit via a series of online surveys in which consent (non-specific) was obtained from consumers for their data to be used in published research. Consumers who presented for care for a persistent pain condition and were treated with a pain science education informed approach were invited to provide anonymous feedback about their current health status and pain journey experience 6, 12 or 18 months after initial assessment. Two-hundred eighteen consumers reported improvement in health status at follow-up. Results of the surveys from three cohorts of consumers that reported improvement were used to generate iterative versions of 'Key Learning Statements'. Early iteration of these Key Learning Statements was used to inform the development of Target Concepts and associated community-targeted pain education resources for use in public health and health professional workforce capacity building initiatives. Perspective This paper reflects an explicit interest in the insights of people who have been challenged by persistent pain and then recovered, to improve pain care. Identifying pain science concepts that consumers valued learning provided valuable information to inform resources for clinical interactions and community-targeted pain education campaigns.

Perinatal mortality audits and reporting of perinatal deaths: systematic review of outcomes and barriers

BACKGROUND

Perinatal deaths are a devastating experience for all families and healthcare professionals involved. Audit of perinatal mortality (PNM) is essential to better understand the factors associated with perinatal death, to identify key deficiencies in healthcare provision and should be utilised to improve the quality of perinatal care. However, barriers exist to successful audit implementation and few countries have implemented national perinatal audit programs.

CONTENT

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and EBSCO host, including Medline, Academic Search Complete and CINAHL Plus databases for articles that were published from 1st January 2000. Articles evaluating perinatal mortality audits or audit implementation, identifying risk or care factors of perinatal mortality through audits, in middle and/or high-income countries were considered for inclusion in this review. Twenty articles met inclusion criteria. Incomplete datasets, nonstandard audit methods and classifications, and inadequate staff training were highlighted as barriers to PNM reporting and audit implementation. Failure in timely detection and management of antenatal maternal and fetal conditions and late presentation or failure to escalate care were the most common substandard care factors identified through audit. Overall, recommendations for perinatal audit focused on standardised audit tools and training of staff. Overall, the implementation of audit recommendations remains unclear.

SUMMARY

This review highlights barriers to audit practices and emphasises the need for adequately trained staff to participate in regular audit that is standardised and thorough. To achieve the goal of reducing PNM, it is crucial that the audit cycle is completed with continuous re-evaluation of recommended changes.

Health System- and Patient-Related Factors Associated with COVID-19 Mortality among Hospitalized Patients in Limpopo Province of South Africa's Public Hospitals

South Africa has recorded the highest COVID-19 morbidity and mortality compared to other African regions. Several authors have linked the least amount of death in African countries with under-reporting due to poor health systems and patients' health-seeking behaviors, making the use of clinical audits more relevant for establishing the root causes of health problems, and improving quality patient care outcomes. Clinical audits, such as mortality audits, have a significant role in improving quality health care services, but very little is documented about the outcomes of the audits. Therefore, the study sought to determine the health care system and patient-related factors associated with COVID-19 mortality by reviewing the COVID-19 inpatient mortality audit narration reports. This was a retrospective qualitative research approach of all hospitalized COVID-19 patients, resulting in death between the first and second COVID-19 pandemic waves. Thematic analysis employed inductive coding to identify themes from mortality audits from all 41 public hospitals in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Four themes with seventeen sub-themes emerged: sub-standard emergency medical care provided, referral system inefficiencies contributed to delays in access to health care services, the advanced age of patients with known and unknown comorbidities, and poor management of medical supplies and equipment, as a health system and patient-related factors that contributed to the high mortality of COVID-19 patients. There is a need to routinely conduct clinical audits to identify clinical challenges and make recommendations for health promotion, risk communication, and community engagement. We recommend reviewing and expanding the scope of practice for health-care providers during epidemics and pandemics that include aspects such as task-shifting.

Becoming a neurosurgeon in the United Kingdom: A road map for medical students and early career doctors

Neurosurgery is one of the most sought-after specialties worldwide. It is one of the most competitive specialties in the United Kingdom. The entire process takes 8 years and the recruitment process aims to select the best of candidates. Not much has been said about the entire selection process from the online application to the interview process, especially with the unprecedented changes brought about by the coronavirus pandemic. There needed to be a roadmap of the entire process, from start to finish, to enable the medical students and early career doctors to make an informed decision, as well as prepare beforehand to meet the criteria that have been set out. A balanced perspective is needed as well, to highlight the drawbacks of pursuing this arduous training specialty in the United Kingdom. This article builds on existing information and throws more light on the application, interview, and the challenges faced by doctors in training. It also shows the challenges the international medical graduate might face during the application process in terms of the shortlisting matrix as well as during training. This article offers advice to all doctors willing to specialize in neurosurgery and highlights what they can do to improve their chances. It sheds more light on the interview process so that shortlisted doctors can know where to focus on during the interviews. Most importantly, by describing the challenges that may be encountered as doctors in training under the NHS, it aims to give a balanced view. This will enable the would-be candidate to make a well-informed choice.

•

Neurosurgical training is highly competitive in the UK.

•

The process involves an online application (building of portfolio) and writing the multi-specialist recruitment exam.

•

International medical graduates have some challenges with some of the portfolio domains.

•

Important domains highlighted as well as things that can be done to improve each domain.

•

An overview of what takes place in the interview.

Implementation of clinical audit to improve adherence to guideline-recommended therapy in acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Despite global consensus on the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), implementation of strategies to improve adherence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains sub-optimal, especially in developing countries. Thus, we aimed to assess the effect of clinical pharmacist-led clinical audit to improve the compliance of discharge prescriptions in patients admitted with ACS. It is a prospective clinical audit of ACS patients which was carried out for 12 months. The discharge prescriptions were audited by clinical pharmacists for the appropriateness in the usage of statins, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). A feedback report was presented every month to the cardiologists involved in the patient care, and the trend in the adherence to GDMT was analyzed over 12 months.

RESULTS

The discharge prescriptions of 1072 ACS patients were audited for the justifiable and non-justifiable omissions of mandated drugs. The first-month audit revealed unreasonable omissions of DAPT, statin, ACE-I/ARB, and beta-blockers in 1%, 0%, 14%, and 11% respectively, which reduced to nil by the end of the 11th month of the audit-feedback program. This improvement remained unchanged until the end of the 12th month.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed that periodic clinical audit significantly improves adherence to GDMT in patients admitted with ACS.

National board governed post-graduate curriculum: Strengths and scope

The National Board of Examinations was established to boost the quality of medical education by laying down exclusive norms, uniform standards and a national level evaluation for the postgraduate medical courses. The content and context of the training curriculum is well updated as per advances in the field and current requirements. Diplomate of National Board (DNB) courses are considered to be at par with the postgraduate and post doctorate degrees for all intents and purposes. The introduction of a formative assessment with objective evaluation pattern has improved the scope of the board. Moving on to a competency-based training with emphasis on novel research can maximise the quality of training to international standards. Training DNB teachers and assessors in the newer teaching and assessment methods can improve the calibre of residents. Stringent monitoring and review of the training can increase the credibility of the courses and the board can be expected to cater for students abroad.

Admissions to a Low-Resource Neonatal Unit in Malawi Using a Mobile App and Dashboard: A 1-Year Digital Perinatal Outcome Audit

Introduction: Understanding the extent and cause of high neonatal deaths rates in Sub-Saharan Africa is a challenge, especially in the presence of poor-quality and inaccurate data. The NeoTree digital data capture and quality improvement system has been live at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Neonatal Unit, Malawi, since April 2019. Objective: To describe patterns of admissions and outcomes in babies admitted to a Malawian neonatal unit over a 1-year period via a prototype data dashboard. Methods: Data were collected prospectively at the point of care, using the NeoTree app, which includes digital admission and outcome forms containing embedded clinical decision and management support and education in newborn care according to evidence-based guidelines. Data were exported and visualised using Microsoft Power BI. Descriptive and inferential analysis statistics were executed using R. Results: Data collected via NeoTree were 100% for all mandatory fields and, on average, 96% complete across all fields. Coverage of admissions, discharges, and deaths was 97, 99, and 91%, respectively, when compared with the ward logbook. A total of 2,732 neonates were admitted and 2,413 (88.3%) had an electronic outcome recorded: 1,899 (78.7%) were discharged alive, 12 (0.5%) were referred to another hospital, 10 (0.4%) absconded, and 492 (20%) babies died. The overall case fatality rate (CFR) was 204/1,000 admissions. Babies who were premature, low birth weight, out born, or hypothermic on admission, and had significantly higher CFR. Lead causes of death were prematurity with respiratory distress (n = 252, 51%), neonatal sepsis (n = 116, 23%), and neonatal encephalopathy (n = 80, 16%). The most common perceived modifiable factors in death were inadequate monitoring of vital signs and suboptimal management of sepsis. Two hundred and two (8.1%) neonates were HIV exposed, of whom a third [59 (29.2%)] did not receive prophylactic nevirapine, hence vulnerable to vertical infection. Conclusion: A digital data capture and quality improvement system was successfully deployed in a low resource neonatal unit with high (1 in 5) mortality rates providing and visualising reliable, timely, and complete data describing patterns, risk factors, and modifiable causes of newborn mortality. Key targets for quality improvement were identified. Future research will explore the impact of the NeoTree on quality of care and newborn survival.

Audit of the Sydney Local Health District Public Health Unit notification and contact tracing system during the first wave of COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a real-time audit to assess a Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) activity to improve the quality of public health data in the Sydney Local Health District (SLHD) Public Health Unit during the first wave of COVID-19.

METHODS

A real-time audit of the Notifiable Conditions Information Management System was conducted for positive cases of COVID-19 and their close contacts from SLHD. After recording missing and inaccurate data, the audit team then corrected the data. Multivariable regression models were used to look for associations with workload and time.

RESULTS

A total of 293 cases were audited. Variables measuring completeness were associated with improvement over time (p<0.0001), whereas those measuring accuracy reduced with increased workload (p=0.0003). In addition, the audit team achieved 100% data quality by correcting data.

CONCLUSION

Utilising a team, separate from operational staff, to conduct a real-time audit of data quality is an efficient and effective way of improving epidemiological data. Implications for public health: Implementation of CQI in a public health unit can improve data quality during times of stress. Auditing teams can also act as an intervention in their own right to achieve high-quality data at minimal cost. Together, this can result in timely and high-quality public health data.

Positive Impact of Clinical Audit on Appropriateness of Laboratory Investigations for Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Patients in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES

The authors aim to assess the use of investigations for patients with acute hemolytic anemia due to glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency and to ensure guidelines application during practice to reduce the misuse of hospital resources in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at a pediatric tertiary hospital on children presenting to the ED with an acute hemolytic crisis due to G6PD deficiency. Initial investigations were collected from patients' records and compared to local hematology unit guidelines. After a period of basic training and guideline dissemination to the residents, a re-audit was conducted. Percentages of the requested investigations in each audit were calculated and compared using Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Fifty-three acute hemolytic anemia patients were included in the initial audit and 58 patients in the re-audit. In the initial audit, the most commonly requested nonindicated investigations were the Coombs test and liver enzymes. The requested nonindicated chemistry labs dropped from 74% in the initial audit to 14% in the re-audit (p < 0.001), and Coombs test from 81% to 12% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of requested investigations for children presenting with G6PD acute hemolytic crisis are nonindicated. Education of medical staff about the guidelines and their continuous assessments through audits were effective at reducing unnecessary diagnostic tests.

Time for change? A qualitative exploration of the educational preparation and subsequent continuing professional development needs of nurse and midwife prescribers

AIM/OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore nurse and midwife prescribers' perception of their educational preparation for the role and identify continuing professional development (CPD) requirements to generate practitioner-based knowledge with the potential to inform education and research, policy and practice.

BACKGROUND

Educational preparation for the nurse and midwife prescribing role has remained relatively unchanged since its introduction and follows a model whereby practitioners engage in theoretical learning and learning situated within the clinical environment, facilitated by a dedicated medical mentor. No significant examination of this preparation has been undertaken in Ireland since 2009.

DESIGN

This was a qualitative study, guided by elements associated with hermeneutic phenomenology.

METHODS

Following research ethics approval and informed consent, 16 participants from 2 maternity hospitals participated in one-to-one audio recorded semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Participants experience of the education programme varied with some acknowledging the importance of a broad pharmacological module whereas others believed it to be irrelevant given their prescribing scope was in many instances quiet narrow. The experience of being mentored by a medical doctor ranged from a positive learning experience to one which did not contribute to learning. Barriers to engaging with CPD were identified along with advancements in the practice arena which identify additional CPD requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has generated practitioner-based knowledge which provides direction for future developments in the educational preparation of nurse and midwife prescribers, particularly around pharmacology and mentorship and outlines specific CPD requirements for practitioners.

Use of Technology to Aid Clinical Audit in an Asian Emergency Medical Services Department

Although clinical audit is generally accepted to be an essential part of quality review and continuous quality improvement, there are limited reports on and several barriers to the implementation of effective clinical audit in an emergency medicine services (EMS) organization. The barriers include the significant amount of time, resources, and effort often required to conduct the audit. In this paper, we present a technology-enabled clinical audit tool, termed Medical Service Transformation and Innovation Compass (MYSTIC), which has transformed the way the clinical audit is performed in our EMS department. MYSTIC is a Python program we developed in-house, that extracts data from data fields found in routine ambulance case records maintained by our paramedics, and automatically assigns "pass" or "fail" flags based on pre-defined audit criteria. Compared to previous manual auditing, implementation of the MYSTIC computerized audit system increased the coverage of cases undergoing audit from 10% to 100% of all EMS-attended cases, and we were able to promptly identify and address some deficits in training and knowledge amongst our paramedics.

SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA® Project: Results of the Implementation of Best Practice in a Spanish National Health System (NHS)

The use of certain strategies for the implementation of a specific recommendation yields better results in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an evidence-based model using clinical audits (GRIP model), for the implementation of recommendations in pain and urinary incontinence management as well as fall prevention, in the Spanish National Health System during the period 2015-2018. A quasi-experimental study has been conducted. The subjects were patients treated in hospitals, primary care units and nursing home centers. There were measures related to pain, fall prevention and urinary incontinence. Measurements were taken at baseline and at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. The sample consisted of 22,114 patients. The frequency of pain assessment increased from 59.9% in the first cycle to a mean of 71.6% in the last cycle, assessments of risk of falling increased from 56.8% to 87.8% in the last cycle; and finally, the frequency of assessments of urinary incontinence increased from a 43.4% in the first cycles to a mean of 62.2% in the last cycles. The implementation of specific evidence-based recommendations on pain, fall prevention, and urinary incontinence using a model based on clinical audits improved the frequency of assessments and their documentation.

Audit of the provision of nutritional support to mechanically ventilated dogs and cats

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of enteral and parenteral nutrition in a population of mechanically ventilated cats and dogs, identify factors associated with implementation of nutrition, and assess the frequency of nutritional support within 72 hours of absent caloric intake.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center audit from June 2013 to June 2016.

SETTING

ICU of a veterinary university teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Fifty-eight animals (50 dogs, 8 cats) that underwent mechanical ventilation for ≥6 hours with complete medical records.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data collected included nutritional provision, time to initiation of nutrition, period of absent caloric intake, percentage of caloric intake obtained, and possible factors contributing to the delay or failure to implement nutrition. Thirty-one percent of patients (dogs 16/50, 32%; cats 2/8, 25%) received nutritional support during mechanical ventilation with all but 2 dogs receiving parenteral nutrition. Of those patients that did not receive nutrition (dogs 34/50, 68%; cats 6/8, 75%), documented contraindications or notations within the medical record for its omission were present in 16 of 34 dogs (47%) and 4 of 6 cats (66.7%). Thirteen animals (11 dogs, 2 cats) had >72 hours of absent caloric intake with only a small number of these receiving nutrition (dogs 4/11, 36.4%; cats 0/2, 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 18 of 58 (31%) mechanically ventilated dogs and cats at our institution received nutritional support, and the majority of these were fed parenterally (16/18, 88.9%). For animals that did not receive nutrition, there was no clear reason for its absence in many cases. Animals with absent caloric intake >72 hours had poor implementation of nutritional support in contrast to current guidelines. A repeat audit after implementing changes to institutional protocols for nutritional provision is warranted to assess the impact on morbidity and mortality.

A structured pathway for developing your complex abdominal hernia service: our York pathway

PURPOSE

Clinical pathways are widely prevalent in health care and may be associated with increased clinical efficacy, improved patient care, streamlining of services, while providing clarity on patient management. Such pathways are well established in several branches of healthcare services but, to the authors' knowledge, not in complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR). A stepwise, structured and comprehensive approach to managing complex abdominal wall hernia (CAWH) patients, which has been successfully implemented in our practice, is presented.

METHODS

A literature search of common databases including Embase® and MEDLINE® for CAWH pathways identified no comprehensive pathway. We therefore undertook a reiterative process to develop the York Abdominal Wall Unit (YAWU) through examination of current evidence and logic to produce a pragmatic redesign of our own pathway. Having introduced our pathway, we then performed a retrospective analysis of the complexity and number of abdominal wall cases performed in our trust over time.

RESULTS

We describe our pathway and demonstrate that the percentage of cases and their complexity, as defined by the VHWG classification, have increased over time in York Abdominal Wall Unit.

CONCLUSION

A structured pathway for complex abdominal wall hernia service is one way to improve patient experience and streamline services. The relevance of pathways for the hernia surgeon is discussed alongside this pathway. This may provide a useful guide to those wishing to establish similar personalised pathways within their own units and allow them to expand their service.

Adherence of Healthcare Workers to Saudi Management Guidelines of Heat-Related Illnesses during Hajj Pilgrimage

Heat-related illnesses (HRIs), such as heatstroke (HS) and heat exhaustion (HE), are common complications during Hajj pilgrims. The Saudi Ministry of Health (MoH) developed guidelines on the management of HRIs to ensure the safety of all pilgrims. This study aimed to assess healthcare workers' (HCWs) adherence to the updated national guidelines regarding pre-hospital and in-hospital management of HRIs. This was a cross-sectional study using a questionnaire based on the updated HRI management interim guidelines for the Hajj season. Overall, compliance with HE guidelines scored 5.5 out of 10 for basic management and 4.7 out of 10 for advanced management. Medical staff showed an average to above average adherence to pre-hospital HS management, including pre-hospital considerations (7.2), recognition of HS (8.1), case assessment (7.7), stabilizing airway, breathing, and circulation (8.7), and cooling (5). The overall compliance to in-hospital guidelines for HS management were all above average, except for special conditions (4.3). In conclusion, this survey may facilitate the evaluation of the adherence to Saudi HRIs guidelines by comparing annual levels of compliance. These survey results may serve as a tool for the Saudi MoH to develop further recommendations and actions.

The ripple effect of evidence implementation: a descriptive evaluation of JBI's Evidence-based Clinical Fellowship Program

BACKGROUND

Across healthcare there are acknowledged gaps in the translation of evidence into clinical practice. Undertaking a structured implementation program may assist clinicians to achieve this in their clinical practice setting.

AIMS/METHODS

The current study descriptively evaluates and analyzes the impact of JBI's (formerly known as the Joanna Briggs Institute) Evidence-based Clinical Fellowship program, since its inception in 2005.

RESULTS

Since its inception the JBI Evidence-based Clinical Fellowship Program has trained over 560 Clinical Fellows. The program consists of two 1-week intensive training workshops at JBI, collaborating with a JBI Research Fellow facilitator, with each participant then conducting a workplace evidence implementation project over the intervening 6 months in their own clinical setting. A 'train-the-trainer' program was established to provide accredited trainers to run the program through established JBI Collaborating Entities.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of research evidence into the clinical setting is challenging for health professionals. A pragmatic approach adopted through the JBI Evidence-based Clinical Fellowship Program ensures that the Clinical Fellow remains central as the program leader, but has direction and support from their team of various stakeholders, and ongoing collaboration with a JBI facilitator. This ensures increased capacity for engagement and ongoing sustainability of future implementation programs.

Managers' support on implementation of maternal guidelines, Limpopo province, South Africa

BACKGROUND

The report of Saving Mothers indicated a decline of maternal mortality from 12.8% to 12.5% last triennium of 2017. This shows that regardless of availability of national maternal health guidelines, midwives and managers, 25% of maternal deaths were caused by preventable and avoidable factors. As such, support provided by managers is vital in promoting the utilisation of maternal guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to determine the support offered by managers to midwives during the implementation of maternal health guidelines.

METHOD

The study design was cross-sectional descriptive in a quantitative domain. Simple random sampling was used to select 58 operational managers and two maternal managers. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23. Descriptive statistics provided by Microsoft Excel in the form of charts was used to describe data. Pearson's correlation test was used to describe relationships amongst variables.

RESULTS

The results revealed that 83.3% respondents indicated a shortage of staff to attend pregnant women. Fifty-six per cent of managers indicated that shortage of material resources contributed to substandard implementation of maternal guidelines. Supervision and monitoring of implementation of maternal guidelines was difficult as indicated by 53.3%, and 63.3% indicated lack of supervision.

CONCLUSION

Limited support in terms of monitoring and supervision by managers was strongly indicated as having a negative effect on implementation of maternal guidelines. Capacity building was offered; however, shortage of resources led to poor implementation of maternal guidelines by midwives.

Clinical Audit Platform for Students (CAPS): a pilot study

BACKGROUND

A clinical audit measures specific clinical outcomes or processes against a predefined standard. However, many clinicians are unable to carry out audits given their time constraints. Alternatively, medical students may often wish to complete audits early in their career to strengthen their portfolios. As such, the student clinical audit platform was designed to connect willing supervisors and these medical students.

METHODS

Project supervisors were members of a regional trainee-led network. Interested students were familiarised with the various aspects of an audit and allocated to supervisors with similar interests. There was regular communication to track progress and anonymised feedback forms were distributed to all students and supervisors after a year.

RESULTS

A total of 17 responses were received from the 19 students who were involved in a project. Based on a 5-point Likert scale, students displayed a mean improvement in their understanding of a clinical audit (1.18±1.07, p<0.001), the confidence to approach a supervisor (1.29±1.21, p<0.001) and the ability to conduct an audit by themselves in the future (1.77±1.15, p<0.001). Of the seven affiliated supervisors, five provided feedback with 80% indicating they had projects which remained inactive and all happy with the quality of work produced by their students.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations to this programme, the platform produced projects which were disseminated both locally and nationally, demonstrating positive collaboration between medical students and clinicians. We present our findings and evaluations to encourage similar audit platforms to be adopted at other locations.

Analysis of teaching methods in anaesthesia in the undergraduate curriculum of four veterinary universities

OBJECTIVE

To design a holistic audit tool to assess the effectiveness of anaesthesia teaching strategies, and thereby to study veterinary undergraduate teaching methods in different geographical areas.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative study using interviews of university staff and students to identify common themes and differences in teaching veterinary anaesthesia.

METHODS

An audit was performed using an audit tool in four veterinary universities (École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, France; Royal Veterinary College, UK; University of Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Alma mater studiorum - Università di Bologna, Italy). First, an open-question interview of anaesthesia head of service (60-90 minutes) identified the pedagogical strategies in order to conceive a subsequent semi-directive interview formulated as a SWOT analysis (Strength/Weaknesses/Opportunity/Threats). Second, the SWOT reflection was conducted by a second staff member and focussed on: 1) general organization; 2) topics for pre-rotation teaching; 3) teaching methods for clinical rotation; and 4) assessment methods. Qualitative analysis of the interview responses was performed with semi-structured interviews. Finally, the students evaluated their teaching through a students' questionnaire generated from the output of both interviews.

RESULTS

A group of nine lecturers and 106 students participated in the study at four different sites. Preclinical teaching ranged from 13 to 24 hours (median 15 hours). Clinical teaching ranged from 4 to 80 hours (median 60 hours). Overall, all faculties perceived time as a limitation and attempted to design strategies to achieve the curriculum expectations and optimize teaching using more time-efficient exercises. Large animal anaesthesia teaching was found to be a common area of weakness. Internal feedback was delivered to each university, whereas generalized results were shared globally.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study proved the generalizability of the protocol used. Recruiting a larger pool of universities would help to identify and promote efficient teaching strategies and innovations for training competent new graduates in an ever-expanding curriculum.

Use of a simplified clinical audit tool to evaluate hypertension and diabetes management in primary care clinics in Jamaica

This study evaluates a simple clinical audit tool for assessing quality of care and blood pressure control among persons with hypertension in primary care clinics. A systematic random sampling of persons with diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN) attending five health centers in Kingston, Jamaica, was conducted. A modified Ministry of Health paper-based audit tool captured quality of care and outcome indicators (blood pressure and glycemic control). Additional chart audits were conducted by a physician and nurse to assess reliability. One hundred and forty-nine charts were audited between January and September 2017. One hundred and thirty-eight persons (92.6%) had hypertension (27 men and 111 women); 77 persons (51.7%) had DM (14 men and 63 women). The median age was 64 years old. Approximately two-thirds of persons with HTN and DM had electrolytes, lipid profile, and ECG done within the last year. One-fifth of persons with hypertension (18.5% men and 19.8% women, P = 1.000) had adequate blood pressure control with greater control among persons with HTN only compared to persons with both DM and HTN. Poor glycemic control was recorded for 69% of persons with DM (57% men and 71% women, P = .297). Moderate to substantial inter-rater agreement was observed for quality of care indicators. Our findings confirmed that hypertension and glycemic control are inadequate among persons attending primary care clinics in Jamaica's capital city. Simplified clinical audits can provide important quality of care and outcome indicators without losing the meaningfulness of the data collected.

Evaluating alcohol intoxication management services: the EDARA mixed-methods study

Background

Front-line health-care services are under increased demand when acute alcohol intoxication is most common, which is in night-time environments. Cities have implemented alcohol intoxication management services to divert the intoxicated away from emergency care.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability to patients and staff of alcohol intoxication management services and undertake an ethnographic study capturing front-line staff’s views on the impact of acute alcohol intoxication on their professional lives.

Methods

This was a controlled mixed-methods longitudinal observational study with an ethnographic evaluation in parallel. Six cities with alcohol intoxication management services were compared with six matched control cities to determine effects on key performance indicators (e.g. number of patients in the emergency department and ambulance response times). Surveys captured the impact of alcohol intoxication management services on the quality of care for patients in six alcohol intoxication management services, six emergency departments with local alcohol intoxication management services and six emergency departments without local alcohol intoxication management services. The ethnographic study considered front-line staff perceptions in two cities with alcohol intoxication management services and one city without alcohol intoxication management services.

Results

Alcohol intoxication management services typically operated in cities in which the incidence of acute alcohol intoxication was greatest. The per-session average number of attendances across all alcohol intoxication management services was low (mean 7.3, average minimum 2.8, average maximum 11.8) compared with the average number of emergency department attendances per alcohol intoxication management services session (mean 78.8), and the number of patients diverted away from emergency departments, per session, required for services to be considered cost-neutral was 8.7, falling to 3.5 when ambulance costs were included. Alcohol intoxication management services varied, from volunteer-led first aid to more clinically focused nurse practitioner services, with only the latter providing evidence for diversion from emergency departments. Qualitative and ethnographic data indicated that alcohol intoxication management services are acceptable to practitioners and patients and that they address unmet need. There was evidence that alcohol intoxication management services improve ambulance response times and reduce emergency department attendance. Effects are uncertain owing to the variation in service delivery.

Limitations

The evaluation focused on health service outcomes, yet evidence arose suggesting that alcohol intoxication management services provide broader societal benefits. There was no nationally agreed standard operating procedure for alcohol intoxication management services, undermining the evaluation. Routine health data outcomes exhibited considerable variance, undermining opportunities to provide an accurate appraisal of the heterogenous collection of alcohol intoxication management services.

Conclusions

Alcohol intoxication management services are varied, multipartner endeavours and would benefit from agreed national standards. Alcohol intoxication management services are popular with and benefit front-line staff and serve as a hub facilitating partnership working. They are popular with alcohol intoxication management services patients and capture previously unmet need in night-time environments. However, acute alcohol intoxication in emergency departments remains an issue and opportunities for diversion have not been entirely realised. The nurse-led model was the most expensive service evaluated but was also the most likely to divert patients away from emergency departments, suggesting that greater clinical involvement and alignment with emergency departments is necessary. Alcohol intoxication management services should be regarded as fledgling services that require further work to realise benefit.

Future work

Research could be undertaken to determine if a standardised model of alcohol intoxication management services, based on the nurse practitioner model, can be developed and implemented in different settings. Future evaluations should go beyond the health service and consider outcomes more generally, especially for the police. Future work on the management of acute alcohol intoxication in night-time environments could recognise the partnership between health-care, police and ambulance services and third-sector organisations in managing acute alcohol intoxication.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN63096364.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 24. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

What antimicrobial stewardship strategies do NHS commissioning organizations implement in primary care in England?

OBJECTIVES

To identify and explore strategies that English NHS commissioning organizations implemented to improve antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) within primary care.

METHODS

Questionnaire sent to the medicines management teams (MMTs) of all 209 clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England, in 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 89% (187/209) of all English CCGs responded to the questionnaire; 74% of responding CCGs (123/167) had a prescribing incentive/engagement scheme, with MMTs representing 88% (90/102) considering incentive schemes successful or very successful for prioritizing AMS in primary care, especially when linked to prescribing NHS Quality Premium indicators. AMS audits were considered successful or very successful by 91% (126/138) of responding CCGs, as they identify reasons for inappropriate prescribing and opportunities for future improvement. All responding MMTs (169/169 CCGs) reported feeding back local/national antimicrobial prescribing data to the general practices they commission, 85% (142/168) to their CCG/Commissioning Support Unit (CSU) board and only 33% (56/169) to out-of-hours services. Benchmarking prescribing data was reported as a powerful tool to engage practices, facilitating an element of competition and peer pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

National antimicrobial resistance improvement schemes, in particular the NHS England Quality Premium, have influenced CCG improvement priorities. Most CCGs now report successful improvement strategies including the use of both local and national antibiotic prescribing data to motivate improvements; these should be continued and extended to out-of-hours providers. As local audit data have helped to identify reasons for inappropriate prescribing and inform improvement planning, all organizations should adopt this strategy and include it in local quality improvement schemes, ensuring performance reporting to organizational board level.

Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of junior doctors in the UK National Health Service

Objective

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic is disrupting health services worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Design

Interview‐based national survey.

Setting

Women's healthcare units in the National Health Service.

Population

Junior doctors in obstetrics and gynaecology.

Methods

Participants were interviewed by members of the UK Audit and Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology trainees' collaborative between 28 March and 7 April 2020. We used a quantitative analysis for closed‐ended questions and a thematic framework analysis for open comments.

Results

We received responses from 148/155 units (95%), most of the participants were in years 3–7 of training (121/148, 82%). Most completed specific training drills for managing obstetric and gynaecological emergencies in women with COVID‐19 (89/148, 60.1%) and two‐person donning and doffing of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (96/148, 64.9%). The majority of surveyed units implemented COVID‐19‐specific protocols (130/148, 87.8%), offered adequate PPE (135/148, 91.2%) and operated dedicated COVID‐19 emergency theatres (105/148, 70.8%). Most units reduced face‐to‐face antenatal clinics (117/148, 79.1%) and suspended elective gynaecology services (131/148, 88.5%). The 2‐week referral pathway for oncological gynaecology was not affected in half of the units (76/148, 51.4%), but half reported a planned reduction in oncology surgery (82/148, 55.4%).

Conclusion

The provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic seems to be in line with current guidelines, but strategic planning is needed to restore routine gynaecology services and ensure safe access to maternity care in the long term.

Tweetable abstract

Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the acute phase of COVID‐19 is in line with current guidelines, strategic planning is needed to restore routine services and ensure safe access to care in the long term.

Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the acute phase of COVID‐19 is in line with current guidelines, strategic planning is needed to restore routine services and ensure safe access to care in the long term.

This paper includes Author Insights, a video abstract available at https://vimeo.com/rcog/authorinsights16313

Two decades on - cardiothoracic surgical care practitioners in the UK: a narrative review

Background

The role of Surgical Care Practitioner (SCP) was first introduced by the NHS in the field of cardiothoracic surgery more than two decades ago to overcome the chronic shortage of junior doctors, and subsequently evolved into other surgical specialties. This review aims to provide evidence on the current situation of SCPs’ clinical outcomes within their surgical extended role, with an emphasis on the cardiothoracic surgical field.

Method

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase via Ovid, Web of Science and TRIP was conducted with no time restriction to explore the evidence on SCPs. All included articles were reviewed by three researchers using the selection criteria, and a narrative synthesis was undertaken.

Findings

Ten out of the 38 studies identified were selected for inclusion. Only one study specifically investigated cardiothoracic SCPs. Three themes were identified: (1) clinical outcomes (six studies), (2) workforce impact (two studies) and (3) colleagues’ opinions (two studies). All studies demonstrated that SCPs provided safe practice, added value and were of benefit to workforce environments and surgical teams.

Conclusion

Although the current literature provides assurances that the presence of SCPs within surgical teams is beneficial in terms of their clinical outcomes, their impact on the workforce and colleagues’ opinions, a significant gap was identified around the SCPs’ role within their surgical extended role, specifically in cardiac surgery. Thus, prospective clinical research is required to evaluate SCPs’ clinical impact.

Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review

Background

To evaluate the effectiveness of audit and communication strategies to reduce diagnostic errors made by clinicians.

Methods

MEDLINE complete, CINHAL complete, EMBASE, PSNet and Google Advanced. Electronic and manual search of articles on audit systems and communication strategies or interventions, searched for papers published between January 1990 and April 2017. We included studies with interventions implemented by clinicians in a clinical environment with real patients.

Results

A total of 2431 articles were screened of which 26 studies met inclusion criteria. Data extraction was conducted by two groups, each group comprising two independent reviewers. Articles were classified by communication (6) or audit strategies (20) to reduce diagnostic error in clinical settings. The most common interventions were delivered as technology-based systems n = 16 (62%) and within an acute care setting n = 15 (57%). Nine studies reported randomised controlled trials. Three RCT studies on communication interventions and 3 RCTs on audit strategies found the interventions to be effective in reducing diagnostic errors.

Conclusion

Despite numerous studies on interventions targeting diagnostic errors, our analyses revealed limited evidence on interventions being practically used in clinical settings and a bias of studies originating from the US (n = 19, 73% of included studies). There is some evidence that trigger algorithms, including computer based and alert systems, may reduce delayed diagnosis and improve diagnostic accuracy. In trauma settings, strategies such as additional patient review (e.g. trauma teams) reduced missed diagnosis and in radiology departments review strategies such as team meetings and error documentation may reduce diagnostic error rates over time.

Trial registration

The systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42017067056.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0901-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.