Pneumatosis Intestinalis and Intestinal Perforation in a Patient Receiving Tocilizumab

Anti-Interleukin 6 Therapeutics for Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection In Kidney Transplant Recipients

Chronic antibody-mediated rejection is the predominant cause for late renal allograft loss for which there is, as yet, no treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, although there are clinical trials in progress to evaluate novel treatment strategies. The current standard of care treatment is based on expert consensus, rather than scientific evidence, and includes glucocorticoids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulin, with or without rituximab or bortezomib. The low success rate with presently established management protocols represents a conspicuous exigency in the field of kidney transplantation. This review focuses on the biologic basis for interleukin 6 inhibitors, specifically tocilizumab and clazakizumab, and the safety and efficacy profiles of these agents for treatment of chronic antibodymediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

Infectious Complications in Tocilizumab-treated Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Tocilizumab is an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist recently described as a promising treatment for antibody-mediated rejection. We compared infectious complications among tocilizumab-treated kidney transplant patients with those receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)/rituximab.

METHODS

Infections occurring among 148 kidney recipients treated with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV monthly (n = 83) or IVIG/rituximab (n = 65) for donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection through 1 year after treatment cessation were reviewed. Incidence rates of infections were compared using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

There were 106 infections observed over 190.1 person-years, yielding an incidence rate of 558 infections/1000 patient-years. A lower incidence rate of infections was observed among tocilizumab-treated compared with IVIG/rituximab-treated patients (463 infections/1000 patient-years versus 730 infections/1000 patient-years; P = 0.02). Twenty-five of 49 infections (51%) in the IVIG/rituximab group required hospitalization compared with 31 of 57 (54%; P = 0.85) in the tocilizumab group. There were no infection-related deaths in either group. Urinary tract infections and pneumonia were the most common types of infections, whereas gastrointestinal, blood, skin/soft tissue, viral, and fungal infections were less common. On multivariable Poisson regression, there was a lower incidence rate of infections associated with tocilizumab compared with IVIG/rituximab (incidence rate ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Among kidney transplant patients treated with tocilizumab, there was no excess risk of infections compared with standard therapy with IVIG/rituximab.

Pneumatosis Intestinalis in the Setting of COVID-19: A Single Center Case Series From New York

This case series reviews four critically ill patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)] suffering from pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) during their hospital admission. All patients received the biological agent tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin (IL)-6 antagonist, as an experimental treatment for COVID-19 before developing PI. COVID-19 and TCZ have been independently linked to PI risk, yet the cause of this relationship is unknown and under speculation. PI is a rare condition, defined as the presence of gas in the intestinal wall, and although its pathogenesis is poorly understood, intestinal ischemia is one of its causative agents. Based on COVID-19's association with vasculopathic and ischemic insults, and IL-6's protective role in intestinal epithelial ischemia-reperfusion injury, an adverse synergistic association of COVID-19 and TCZ can be proposed in the setting of PI. To our knowledge, this is the first published, single center, case series of pneumatosis intestinalis in COVID-19 patients who received tocilizumab therapy.

Multidisciplinary Guidance Regarding the Use of Immunomodulatory Therapies for Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Immune-mediated lung injury and systemic hyperinflammation are characteristic of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults. Although the majority of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections in pediatric populations result in minimal or mild COVID-19 in the acute phase of infection, a small subset of children develop severe and even critical disease in this phase with concomitant inflammation that may benefit from immunomodulation. Therefore, guidance is needed regarding immunomodulatory therapies in the setting of acute pediatric COVID-19. This document does not provide guidance regarding the recently emergent multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of pediatric subspecialty physicians and pharmacists with expertise in infectious diseases, rheumatology, hematology/oncology, and critical care medicine was convened. Guidance statements were developed based on best available evidence and expert opinion.

RESULTS

The panel devised a framework for considering the use of immunomodulatory therapy based on an assessment of clinical disease severity and degree of multiorgan involvement combined with evidence of hyperinflammation. Additionally, the known rationale for consideration of each immunomodulatory approach and the associated risks and benefits was summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunomodulatory therapy is not recommended for the majority of pediatric patients, who typically develop mild or moderate COVID-19. For children with severe or critical illness, the use of immunomodulatory agents may be beneficial. The risks and benefits of such therapies are variable and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with input from appropriate specialty services. When available, the panel strongly favors immunomodulatory agent use within the context of clinical trials. The framework presented herein offers an approach to decision-making regarding immunomodulatory therapy for severe or critical pediatric COVID-19 and is informed by currently available data, while awaiting results of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials.

Bowel ulceration following tocilizumab administration in a COVID-19 patient

Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-6, has been used to treat cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in a subset of patients with severe COVID-19 disease. Acute ulcerative bowel disease has been only rarely documented in patients treated for rheumatological conditions. The gastrointestinal side effects seen when used in the context of COVID-19 are unknown. We present a case of COVID-19 CRS in which acute terminal ileum and perforated caecal ulceration evolved after tocilizumab exposure. We raise awareness of a possible causal relationship between even a single dose of tocilizumab and gut ulceration in patients with COVID-19. Any such drug enteropathy relationship requires watchful monitoring during upcoming trials of tocilizumab in patients with COVID-19.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

There are many pharmacologic therapies that are being used or considered for treatment of COVID-19. There is a need for frequently updated practice guidelines on their use, based on critical evaluation of rapidly emerging literature.

OBJECTIVE

Develop evidence-based rapid guidelines intended to support patients, clinicians and other health-care professionals in their decisions about treatment and management of patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

IDSA formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel of infectious disease clinicians, pharmacists, and methodologists with varied areas of expertise. Process followed a rapid recommendation checklist. The panel prioritized questions and outcomes. Then a systematic review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

The IDSA guideline panel agreed on 7 treatment recommendations and provided narrative summaries of other treatments undergoing evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

The panel expressed the overarching goal that patients be recruited into ongoing trials, which would provide much needed evidence on the efficacy and safety of various therapies for COVID-19, given that we could not make a determination whether the benefits outweigh harms for most treatments.