Is mandible derived mesenchymal stromal cells superior in proliferation and regeneration to long bone-derived mesenchymal stromal cells?

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for Treatment of Primary Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Single-Center, Non-randomized Study with 2-Year Follow-Up

Introduction

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a widespread, disabling condition with no intervention to fully restore cartilage or halt progression. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), an autologous product from bone marrow aspiration, has shown promise as a regenerative therapy due to its cell composition and chondrogenic effects. Our study aims to assess the functional outcomes, including pain, function, satisfaction, and complications post-BMAC injection in knee OA patients.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective, single-center study, 63 patients with grade II-III knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) scale) unresponsive to conservative management underwent BMAC injection. The procedure involved bone marrow aspiration from the anterior iliac crest, processing to obtain a concentrate, followed by intra-articular injection. Patients were followed for 24 months, assessing outcomes using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and MOCART 2.0 score.

Results

The cohort, with a slight female predominance and predominantly aged 41-50 years, majorly comprised K-L grade III OA patients. BMAC treatment resulted in significant improvements in VAS pain scores, IKDC functional scores, and MOCART 2.0 scores over the 24-month follow-up.

Conclusion

BMAC injection provides significant improvement in both pain and functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up in patients with mild-to-moderate OA of the knee. Further high-quality, adequately powered, multi-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are necessary to justify the routine clinical use of BMAC for treatment of patients suffering with knee OA.

Graphical Abstract

Pioneering nanomedicine in orthopedic treatment care: a review of current research and practices

A developing use of nanotechnology in medicine involves using nanoparticles to administer drugs, genes, biologicals, or other materials to targeted cell types, such as cancer cells. In healthcare, nanotechnology has brought about revolutionary changes in the treatment of various medical and surgical conditions, including in orthopedic. Its clinical applications in surgery range from developing surgical instruments and suture materials to enhancing imaging techniques, targeted drug delivery, visualization methods, and wound healing procedures. Notably, nanotechnology plays a significant role in preventing, diagnosing, and treating orthopedic disorders, which is crucial for patients' functional rehabilitation. The integration of nanotechnology improves standards of patient care, fuels research endeavors, facilitates clinical trials, and eventually improves the patient's quality of life. Looking ahead, nanotechnology holds promise for achieving sustained success in numerous surgical disciplines, including orthopedic surgery, in the years to come. This review aims to focus on the application of nanotechnology in orthopedic surgery, highlighting the recent development and future perspective to bridge the bridge for clinical translation.

Interaction between immuno-stem dual lineages in jaw bone formation and injury repair

The jawbone, a unique structure in the human body, undergoes faster remodeling than other bones due to the presence of stem cells and its distinct immune microenvironment. Long-term exposure of jawbones to an oral environment rich in microbes results in a complex immune balance, as shown by the higher proportion of activated macrophage in the jaw. Stem cells derived from the jawbone have a higher propensity to differentiate into osteoblasts than those derived from other bones. The unique immune microenvironment of the jaw also promotes osteogenic differentiation of jaw stem cells. Here, we summarize the various types of stem cells and immune cells involved in jawbone reconstruction. We describe the mechanism relationship between immune cells and stem cells, including through the production of inflammatory bodies, secretion of cytokines, activation of signaling pathways, etc. In addition, we also comb out cellular interaction of immune cells and stem cells within the jaw under jaw development, homeostasis maintenance and pathological conditions. This review aims to eclucidate the uniqueness of jawbone in the context of stem cell within immune microenvironment, hopefully advancing clinical regeneration of the jawbone.

Functional Outcome Analysis of Autologous Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF) (Sahaj Therapy®) Using Direct Sonication in Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head (ONFH): A 6-Year Follow-Up Study

Introduction

We investigated the safety, efficacy, functional, and clinical outcomes of intra-osseous implantation of mechanically isolated, autologous stromal vascular fraction (SVF), an Australian patented direct ultrasonication technology (Sahaj Therapy®) in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

Materials and Methods

A total of 32 cases of ONFH were enrolled in the study after confirming with an MRI of the affected hip. All cases were treated with an intra-osseous autologous SVF implantation [4-5 cc with the cellular dosage of 8.0 × 107 cells with a viability of > 85% SVF cells] on the same surgical sitting. All the cases were followed up clinically, functionally, and radiologically at regular intervals. A comparison of mean HOOS scores at different follow-ups was done using Paired 't'-test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

In our study, male preponderance was seen (53.1%). According to the modified Ficat and Arlet classification, the most common grade of ONFH was grade 2 [right: 25 hips and left: 25 hips]. There was a statistically significant improvement in the mean HOOS score of the right hip (n = 10) and left hip (n = 9) from preoperative time till 72 months (P < 0.05). The follow-up MRI of the affected hips shows improved osteogenesis without any further worsening of the contour of the femoral head. No adverse effects were seen in any of the study participants.

Conclusion

For individuals with ONFH, treated with intra-osseous autologous SVF implantation in the same surgical procedure is an innovative and promising treatment modality. Even after 6 years of follow-up, the study participants with ONFH have shown good clinical and functional outcomes with autologous SVF.