CPAP pressure for prediction of oral appliance treatment response in obstructive sleep apnea

Differences in Positive Airway Pressure Requirements in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Between Black and White Patients

OBJECTIVE

There are disparities between Black and White patients in the utilization of positive airway pressure (PAP) alternatives for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Given low utilization rates among Black patients, there is limited knowledge of PAP alternative outcomes in this group. Therapeutic PAP levels are clinically accessible measures that have been shown to predict PAP alternative outcomes. Herein, we examined differences in PAP requirements between Black and White patients in a large clinical sample.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Academic sleep center.

METHODS

We included OSA patients prescribed autoadjusting PAP between January 2018 and 2020 with baseline apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 10. Mean and 90th percentile PAP levels were compared between White and Black patients who used PAP for ≥1 hour daily using linear regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), AHI, oxygen saturation nadir, and mask type.

RESULTS

There were 157 Black and 234 White patients who were generally obese (BMI, 37.3 ± 8.7) with severe OSA (AHI, 36.9 ± 25.6). Black patients had a 0.68 cm higher (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36, 1.35) mean PAP level and 0.85 cm H2O higher (95% CI: 0.36, 1.35) 90th percentile PAP level than white patients. Although statistically significant, differences were small and not clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSION

Black and White OSA patients had clinically insignificant differences in PAP requirements, suggesting comparable upper airway collapsibility. Considering the predictive value of therapeutic PAP levels, our findings suggest Black and White patients may have comparable PAP alternative responses from a collapsibility standpoint. Future studies should explore reasons for low utilization of PAP alternatives among Black patients.

DISE with CPAP: a useful procedure to evaluate upper airway collapsibility

PURPOSE

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is commonly performed in patients suffering obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) intolerance. We aimed to evaluate the effects of adding CPAP to DISE to provide understanding of the reason of its failure and better guidance in future therapeutic decisions.

METHODS

A retrospective observational descriptive study was conducted on CPAP-intolerant patients with moderate-severe OSA. DISE was used to evaluate upper airway collapsibility, and CPAP was tested to better describe anatomical sites of obstruction and to measure the opening pharyngeal pressure.

RESULTS

Sample size consisted of 38 patients with a mean age of 49 ± 9 years. Mean BMI was 28.4 ± 2.4 kg/m2, mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 35.4 events per hour ± 20.1, and mean saturation under 90% (TSat90) was 14.5%. In DISE we found a collapse at Velum in 92% of patients, at Oropharyngeal level in 89%, at tongue in 42%, and at epiglottis in 36%. In the subgroup of patients with clinical failure with CPAP, we observed 100% of epiglottic collapse and 50% of tongue obstruction. In this specific population, we recommended personalized surgery and myofunctional therapy.

CONCLUSION

DISE-CPAP is a useful tool to select the treatment that better fits to each patient taking care all information available. It improves our ability to prescribe a multilevel treatment with an exhaustive topographic evaluation of upper airway collapsibility that complements CPAP classic titration, and it can be helpful to distinguish better candidates for surgery, myofunctional therapy or CPAP.

Indications for Dental Specialists for Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Mandibular Advancement Devices: A Narrative Review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome is characterized by repeated airway collapse during sleep. It determines cardiovascular, pulmonary, and neurocognitive consequences and is associated with several daytime and nighttime symptoms that influence the patient's quality of life. The contribution of the dental specialist in the clinical management of OSA patients entails participating in the screening process as diagnostic sentinels and providing adequate treatment using mandibular advancement devices (MADs). Since the treatment of OSA requires a multidisciplinary approach, including different medical specialists, dentists should have a comprehensive understanding of medical and dental factors that influence the strategy and effectiveness of OSA treatment with MAD. Such expertise is crucial in determining the appropriate treatment indications and helps clinicians establish a consolidated position within the multidisciplinary OSA team. In this regard, this review summarizes the evidence of the clinical indications for MAD treatment and provides the dental specialist with helpful information about medical, functional, and other relevant factors that should be considered during diagnosis, treatment plan, and follow-up stages. Information retrieved was organized and discussed, generating specific domains/queries oriented to the clinical management of OSA patients from the clinical perspective of dental specialists.

Self-reported improvement in obstructive sleep apnea symptoms compared to treatment response with mandibular advancement device therapy: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Mandibular advancement device (MAD) is recognized as the treatment option for management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in mild-moderate cases or those unable to tolerate positive airway pressure therapy. Post-treatment sleep study is recommended to establish MAD efficacy when maximal therapeutic benefit is achieved based on OSA symptom improvement or maximum anatomical protrusion. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference between responders and non-responders in OSA symptom improvement and predictors of treatment success.

METHODS

Medical charts of patients referred to the Orofacial Pain Clinic between 2016 and 2021 for management of OSA with MAD were retrospectively evaluated. Participants with post-treatment sleep study with MAD in situ were included. Participants were categorized as responders according to different criteria: 50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) compared to baseline; post-treatment AHI ≤ 10 with ≥ 50% reduction from baseline; AHI ≤ 5 with ≥ 50% reduction. OSA symptoms included snoring, apneas, sleep quality, tiredness upon awakening, daytime sleepiness, and subjective improvement. Differences in pre- and post-treatment variables within/between groups and predictors were analyzed with t test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 53 participants (30 females), mean age was 64.2 ± 10.7 and pre-treatment was AHI 23.3 ± 17.2. Depending upon the criteria, responders ranged between 26 and 57%. At first follow-up after MAD delivery, non-responders reported less tiredness upon awakening (p = 0.003), better sleep quality (p = 0.005), and greater subjective improvement (p = 0.012) than responders. Among significant OSA symptoms, tiredness upon awakening, poorer sleep quality, and less subjective improvement were consistently found as predictors of treatment response.

CONCLUSION

Subjective improvement, sleep quality, and tiredness upon awakening significantly improved in non-responders at first follow-up compared to responders, according to the strictest definition of treatment response. Therefore, a post-treatment sleep study is crucial to confirm proper management of OSA with MAD.

Endotyping, phenotyping and personalised therapy in obstructive sleep apnoea: are we there yet?

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) was traditionally thought to be mainly caused by obesity and upper airway crowding, and hence OSA management was not personalised according to particular characteristics, with most symptomatic patients receiving continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Recent advances in our understanding have identified additional potential and distinct causes of OSA (endotypes), and subgroups of patients (phenotypes) with increased risk of cardiovascular complications. In this review, we discuss the evidence to date as to whether there are distinct clinically useful endotypes and phenotypes of OSA, and the challenges to the field in moving towards delivering personalised therapy in OSA.

The Accuracy and Reliability of Visually Assessed Pharyngeal Opening Pressures During Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy

OBJECTIVE

To examine the accuracy and interrater reliability of a visually assessed vs airflow-based measure of pharyngeal collapsibility obtained in patients with obstructive sleep apnea undergoing drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care practice.

METHODS

Patients underwent DISE with airflow monitoring and nasal positive airway pressure titration to determine visual and airflow-based levels of pharyngeal opening pressure (PhOP). Visual DISE-PhOP was assessed by 2 blinded independent raters and defined as the pressure at which visual confirmation of airway collapse, including snoring, was abolished. Airflow-based DISE-PhOP was defined as the minimally effective positive airway pressure that abolished inspiratory flow limitation. Equivalence testing between visual and airflow DISE-PhOP of each rater was performed with the two one sided T-test (TOST) with an a priori equivalence bound of ±1 cm H2 O. Interrater reliability was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were enrolled in the study and 77 completed the full evaluation. The population was predominantly male (74%) with an average age of 54.8 years, body mass index of 30.1 kg/m2 , and apnea-hypopnea index of 30.7 events/h. Equivalence testing showed that both raters were within ±1 cm H2 O of airflow-based DISE-PhOP (-0.43 to 0.09 cm H2 O and -0.32 to 0.48 cm H2 O). Interrater reliability of visual DISE-PhOP between the raters was also good to excellent with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.895 (95% CI, 0.84-0.932).

CONCLUSION

DISE-PhOP, a measure of upper airway collapsibility, was equivalent between airflow-based and visual assessments with strong interrater reliability, supporting its adoption as a standardized objective parameter in clinical DISE.

How can general dental practitioners help in the management of sleep apnoea?

This article discusses the aetiology, prevalence and treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and highlights the important role general dental practitioners can perform in improving the quality of life of patients suffering from OSA. Clinical and laboratory stages of making a mandibular advancement appliance are also highlighted.Members of the dental team have a duty of care to our patients. The earlier undiagnosed cases of OSA are referred for treatment, the less morbidity and potential mortality endured by patients.After reading this article, the reader should have a greater understanding of OSA, how to identify symptoms of the condition in patients and be confident in referring patients to appropriate healthcare professionals.

Low Arousal Threshold Estimation Predicts Failure of Mandibular Advancement Devices in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Introduction: The treatment of choice for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). However, CPAP is usually poorly tolerated and mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are an alternative innovative therapeutic approach. Uncertainty still remains as to the most suitable candidates for MAD. Herein, it is hypothesized that the presence of low arousal threshold (low ArTH) could be predictive of MAD treatment failure. Methods: A total of 32 consecutive patients, with OSAS of any severity, who preferred an alternate therapy to CPAP, were treated with a tailored MAD aimed at obtaining 50% of their maximal mandibular advancement. Treatment response after 6 months of therapy was defined as AHI < 5 events per hour or a reduction of AHI ≥ 50% from baseline. Low ArTH was predicted based on the following polysomnography features, as previously shown by Edwards et al.: an AHI of 82.5% and a hypopnea fraction of total respiratory events of >58.3%. Results: There were 25 (78.1%) responders (p-value < 0.01) at 6 months. Thirteen patients (40.6%) in the non-severe group reached AHI lower than 5 events per hour. MAD treatment significantly reduced the median AHI in all patients from a median value of 22.5 to 6.5 (74.7% of reduction, p-value < 0.001). The mandibular advancement device reduced AHI, whatever the disease severity. A significant higher reduction of Delta AHI, after 6 months of treatment, was found for patients without low ArTH. Conclusions: Low ArTH at baseline was associated with a poorer response to MAD treatment and a lower AHI reduction at 6 months. A non-invasive assessment of Low ArTH can be performed through the Edwards’ score, which could help to identify an endotype with a lower predicted response to oral appliances in a clinical setting.

Prediction of Mandibular Advancement Device Response Using CPAP Pressure in Different Polysomnographic Phenotypes

Objective

Both continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) pressure and polysomnographic phenotypes have been associated with mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment response, but the precise relationship has not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that utilizing CPAP pressure would predict the MAD response in treatment-naïve patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and the MAD response would be associated with two polysomnographic phenotypes, including sleep stage dependency and positional dependency.

Methods

OSA treatment-naïve patients with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15/h who declined CPAP treatment and received MAD treatment for 3-6 months were enrolled. The MAD treatment response was defined as 1) residual AHI under MAD (AHIMAD) <5/h and 2) AHIMAD <10/h. Logistic regression was applied to identify the association between CPAP pressure and MAD treatment responders. The predictability of the MAD responder status utilizing CPAP pressure was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC).

Results

A total of 128 enrolled patients (AHI ≥30/h in 74.2%) were recruited, of whom 119 patients and 80 patients were included for analysis of sleep stage and positional dependency, respectively. REM-predominant OSA had lower AHI than stage-independent OSA, while the supine-predominant phenotype had lower anthropometrics than the nonpositional-dependent phenotype. The response rates for AHIMAD <5/h and AHIMAD <10/h were 25.8% and 48.4%, respectively. Lower anthropometrics, baseline AHI, and supine predominance were associated with the responder status, while CPAP pressure was an independent predictor. The AUROCs for the prediction of AHIMAD <5/h and AHIMAD <10/h responders were 0.635 and 0.664, respectively. Utilizing a CPAP level >14 cmH2O as the cutoff to predict criterion 1 and 2 nonresponders, the sensitivity was 93.9% and 95.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

In treatment-naïve patients with moderate-severe OSA, the supine-predominant phenotype and lower CPAP pressure were associated with the MAD response, while the sleep stage dependency phenotype was not. Utilization of a CPAP level >14 cmH2O could be a sensitive measure to identify nonresponders.

Optimizing Mandibular Advancement Maneuvers during Sleep Endoscopy with a Titratable Positioner: DISE-SAM Protocol

Mandibular advancement devices (MAD) are an effective alternative treatment to CPAP. Different maneuvers were performed during drug sleep-induced endoscopy (DISE) to mimic the effect of MAD. Using the Selector Avance Mandibular (SAM) device, we aimed to identify MAD candidates during DISE using a titratable, reproducible, and measurable maneuver. This DISE-SAM protocol may help to find the relationship between the severity of the respiratory disorder and the degree of response and determine the advancement required to improve the collapsibility of the upper airway. Explorations were performed in 161 patients (132 males; 29 females) with a mean age of 46.81 (SD = 11.42) years, BMI of 27.90 (SD = 4.19) kg/m², and a mean AHI of 26.51 (SD = 21.23). The results showed no relationship between severity and MAD recommendation. Furthermore, there was a weak positive relationship between the advancement required to obtain a response and the disease severity. Using the DISE-SAM protocol, the response and the range of mandibular protrusion were assessed, avoiding the interexaminer bias of the jaw thrust maneuver. We suggest prescribing MAD as a single, alternative, or multiple treatment approaches following the SAM recommendations in a personalized design.

Beyond VOTE: The New Frontier of Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy

Alternatives to positive airway pressure therapy, including surgery, represent an important area of research. Specifically, predictors of response to surgical therapy remain underdeveloped. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) holds promise as a diagnostic tool to identify patient-specific causes of airway collapse. Herein, we present a novel, standardized approach which combines anatomic and physiologic measurements during DISE. Our DISE platform measures airflow, airway compliance, airway collapsibility, and structural drivers of collapse. Taken together, these inputs provide a comprehensive framework to further inform the surgeon in providing personalized care of the patient with obstructive sleep apnea.

Influence of apnea vs hypopnea predominance in predicting mean therapeutic positive airway pressures among patients with obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Lower therapeutic positive airway pressure (PAP) levels are associated with improved response to non-PAP therapies in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevailing notion that patients with apnea-predominant obstructive sleep apnea require higher therapeutic PAP levels compared to patients with hypopnea-predominant obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed using strict inclusion criteria: presence of type I or III sleep study, apnea-hypopnea index > 10 events/h, and adherence to auto-adjusting continuous positive airway pressure. Patients were stratified by apnea (> 50% apneas) or hypopnea (≤ 50% apneas) predominance, and PAP data were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t test and linear regression modeling.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2020, 500 patients met inclusion criteria. Two hundred twenty-one (44.1%) patients were apnea-predominant and 279 (55.8%) were hypopnea-predominant. Apnea-predominant patients had a slightly greater mean PAP (9.01 vs 8.36, P = .002) than hypopnea-predominant patients. Univariable and multivariable linear regression of 7 variables (obstructive apnea percentage, age, sex, body mass index, apnea-hypopnea index, O₂ nadir, mask type) showed obstructive apnea percentage was the weakest predictor of therapeutic PAP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Apnea-predominant individuals demonstrated a clinically insignificant difference in PAP level compared to hypopnea-predominant individuals; moreover, obstructive apnea percentage was not a strong predictor of therapeutic PAP levels. Of the modeled variables, the strongest predictor of PAP level was apnea-hypopnea index. Further studies are needed to explore these relationships as well as additional variables that may contribute to predicting therapeutic PAP levels.

CITATION

Yu JL, Liu Y, Tangutur A, et al. Influence of apnea vs hypopnea predominance in predicting mean therapeutic positive airway pressures among patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(11):2171-2178.

Custom-Made Dual-Functional Oral Appliance for Management of Obstructive Sleep Apneic Completely Edentulous Patient

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) being a gold standard treatment to open the upper airway by application of controlled compressed air is still not a widely accepted mode of treatment among obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) individuals. To improve patency of upper airway space and reduce the risk of sleep apnoea, it is essential to provide mandibular advancement devices (MADs) that could provide non-continuous positive airway pressure (non-CPAP) for patients with OSA. Availability of prefabricated oral appliances (OAs) like MADs, tongue holding devices reduced the chair-side fabrication time but has poor adaptation, excessive salivation, and deprivation of sleep. Customized OAs can overcome these challenges, but their fabrication for an edentulous individual is challenging due to the absence of teeth and the encroachment of tongue space by the device. This clinical report gives an insight into the clinical and technical aspect of fabrication of MAD with tongue retaining space for an edentulous individual with OSA.

Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment Efficacy Is Associated with Polysomnographic Endotypes

Rationale: Mandibular advancement device (MAD) treatment efficacy varies among patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Objectives: The current study aims to explain underlying individual differences in efficacy using obstructive sleep apnea endotypic traits calculated from baseline clinical polysomnography: collapsibility (airflow at normal ventilatory drive), loop gain (drive response to reduced airflow), arousal threshold (drive preceding arousal), compensation (increase in airflow as drive increases), and the ventilatory response to arousal (increase in drive explained by arousal). On the basis of previous research, we hypothesized that responders to MAD treatment have a lower loop gain and milder collapsibility.Methods: Thirty-six patients (median apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], 23.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 19.7-29.8] events/h) underwent baseline and 3-month follow-up full polysomnography, with MAD fixed at 75% of maximal protrusion. Traits were estimated using baseline polysomnography according to Sands and colleagues. Response was defined as an AHI reduction ≥ 50%.Results: MAD treatment significantly reduced AHI (49.7%_baseline [23.9-63.6], median [IQR]). Responders exhibited lower loop gain (mean [95% confidence interval], 0.53 [0.48-0.58] vs. 0.65 [0.57-0.73]; P = 0.020) at baseline than nonresponders, a difference that persisted after adjustment for baseline AHI and body mass index. Elevated loop gain remained associated with nonresponse after adjustment for collapsibility (odds ratio, 3.03 [1.16-7.88] per 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in loop gain [SD, 0.15]; P = 0.023).Conclusions: MAD nonresponders exhibit greater ventilatory instability, expressed as higher loop gain. Assessment of the baseline degree of ventilatory instability using this approach may improve upfront MAD treatment patient selection.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01532050).

Non-continuous positive airway pressure treatment options in obstructive sleep apnoea: A pathophysiological perspective

The phenotyping of the pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) lies at the core of tailored treatments and it is one of the most debated topics in sleep medicine research. Recent sophisticated techniques have broadened the horizon for gaining insight into the variability of the endotypic traits in patients with OSA which account for the heterogeneity in the clinical presentation of the disease and consequently, in the outcome of treatment. However, the implementation of these concepts into clinical practice is still a major challenge for both researchers and clinicians in order to develop tailored therapies targeted to specific endotypic traits that contribute to OSA in each individual patient. This review summarizes available scientific evidence in order to point out the links between endotypic traits (pharyngeal airway collapsibility, upper airway neuromuscular compensation, loop gain and arousal threshold) and the most common non-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment options for OSA (mandibular advancement device, upper airway surgery, medication therapy, positional therapy) and to clarify to what extent endotypic traits could help to better predict the success of these therapies. A narrative guide is provided; current design limitations and future avenues of research are discussed, with clinical and research perspectives.

Clinical Evidence in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea with Oral Appliances: A Systematic Review

Background

Recent clinical guidelines have extended indications for oral appliances to subjects affected by moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The aim of this systematic review covering this important issue for public health is twofold: updating and summarizing the best available scientific evidence by selecting RCTs of quality only, and identifying the therapeutic pathways that can be transferred to the current clinical practice.

Methods

All the abstracts which were published before February 18, 2019, have been identified in three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane). The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used as an assessment tool in order to evaluate the quality of the selected studies.

Results

The search strategy yielded 2,260 studies. After removing duplicates and studies that did not comply with the inclusion criteria, 32 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 17 RCTs were finally included in the qualitative synthesis. The 17 selected studies were very heterogeneous in the type of included RCTs in terms of patient inclusion criteria, sample size, distribution of the two genders in the various groups, duration of treatment, and definition of primary and secondary outcomes, without any restriction on the definition of the control group. A common finding was the positive responsiveness of oral appliance treatment in subjects affected by mild-to-moderate OSA with some evidence for cases of severe OSA.

Conclusion

Higher-quality studies are needed in order to provide additional useful guidelines for dental clinicians for OSA management.

A consideration of factors affecting palliative oral appliance effectiveness for obstructive sleep apnea: a scoping review

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This scoping review allows physicians, researchers, and others interested in obstructive sleep apnea to consider effectiveness of oral appliances (OAs). The intent is to improve understanding of OA effectiveness by considering morphologic interaction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

Morphologic and biomechanical criteria for positional alterations of the mandible assessed success rates of OA appliances. Searches of databases (Medline, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EBSCO) using terms: OA treatment effectiveness and positive and/or negative outcome predictors. Craniofacial predictors of OAs and obstructive sleep apnea biomechanical factors of anatomical traits associated with OA effectiveness were included. Databases searched radiographic cephalometric imaging for morphology/phenotypes and apnea-hypopnea index responses. Articles were excluded if title or abstract was not relevant or a case report. If the analysis did not report mean or standard deviation for apnea-hypoxia index, it was excluded. No language, age, or sex restrictions were applied.

RESULTS

Analysis of 135 articles included in searched literature indicated alterations in musculature and pharyngeal airway structure through OA use. These alterations were individually unpredictable with wide variability 61.81% ± 12.29 (apnea-hypoxia index mean ± standard deviation). Morphologic variations as predictors were typically weak and idiosyncratic. Biomechanical factors and wide variations in the metrics of appliance application were unclear, identifying gaps in knowledge and practice of OAs.

CONCLUSIONS

An integrated basis to identify morphologic and biomechanical elements of phenotypic expressions of sleep-disordered breathing in the design and application of OAs is needed. Current knowledge is heterogeneous and shows high variability. Identification of subgroups of patients with obstructive sleep apnea responding to OAs is needed.

Predicting treatment response to mandibular advancement therapy using a titratable thermoplastic device

OBJECTIVES

Mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy is the most commonly used second-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but MAD may be ineffective in a subgroup of patients. We describe the use of a trial of a titratable thermoplastic MAD to predict treatment outcomes with a custom-made MAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with a thermoplastic MAD as a trial before custom-made MAD manufacturing were included in the study. Sleep recordings and clinical outcomes assessed after 6 months of treatment with each device were compared. Predictive utility of thermoplastic MAD to identify custom-made MAD treatment success defined as a reduction greater than 50% and final apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) less than 10 events/h was evaluated.

RESULTS

Thermoplastic MADs were installed in 111 patients, but only 36 patients were finally treated with both devices and were included in the analysis. A significant correlation was observed between the impact of the two devices on the AHI (r=0.85, p<0.0001), oxygen desaturation index (r=0.73, p<0.0001), snoring index (r=0.85, p<0.0001), and Epworth sleepiness scale (r=0.77, p<0.0001). A high positive predictive value (86%) but a low negative predictive value (46%) was observed regarding AHI decrease.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar impacts of both MADs were observed on major OSA severity markers and symptoms. The ability of thermoplastic MAD to indicate likelihood of success with custom-made MAD will require further controlled studies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Thermoplastic MADs could represent a useful and easily implemented tool to predict the likelihood of success of a custom-made MAD as treatment for OSA.

ATS Core Curriculum 2020. Adult Sleep Medicine

The American Thoracic Society Core Curriculum updates clinicians annually in adult and pediatric pulmonary disease, medical critical care, and sleep medicine, in a 3–4-year recurring cycle of topics. These topics will be presented at the 2020 Virtual Conference. Below is the adult sleep medicine core that includes topics pertinent to sleep-disordered breathing and insomnia.

Therapeutic Positive Airway Pressure Level Predicts Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine whether therapeutic positive airway pressure (PAP) level predicts response to hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) for obstructive sleep apnea using the coprimary outcomes of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and 4% oxygen desaturation index.

METHODS

Combined cohort study from two US sleep otolaryngology training programs. Subjects were adults with AHI > 15 events/h who underwent HGNS. Eligible subjects had diagnostic preoperative sleep studies, full-night efficacy postoperative studies and therapeutic PAP levels available for analysis. Low and high PAP groups were compared using the t test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients met all inclusion criteria. On average, patients were male, Caucasian, middle-aged, and overweight. Thirteen patients were in the low PAP group (< 8 cm H₂O) and 43 patients in the high PAP group (≥ 8 cm H₂O). Although both groups experienced improvement of polysomnographic measures with HGNS, the low PAP group achieved a significantly larger mean AHI reduction (36.7 ± 22.7 versus 18.4 ± 23.4, P = .02). Additionally, the low PAP group had a greater response rate (defined as AHI < 20 events/h and > 50% reduction of AHI) than the high PAP group (92% versus 44%, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic PAP level may aid in the discernment of candidacy for HGNS, with a strong positive predictive value for PAP levels < 8 cm H₂O. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm these findings.

CITATION

Lee CH, Seay EG, Walters BK, Scalzitti NJ, Dedhia RC. Therapeutic positive airway pressure level predicts response to hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(8):1165-1172.

Phenotypic Labelling Using Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Improves Patient Selection for Mandibular Advancement Device Outcome: A Prospective Study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Mandibular advancement device (MAD) outcome varies between patients. We hypothesized that upper airway collapse sites, patterns, and degrees assessed during baseline drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) affect MAD outcome.

METHODS

One hundred patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were included and underwent baseline type 1 polysomnography. MAD was fitted intraorally at fixed 75% maximal protrusion. A total of 72 patients completed 3-month follow-up polysomnography and baseline DISE. Response was defined as apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) reduction ≥ 50%, deterioration as AHI increases during MAD treatment compared to baseline.

RESULTS

Adjusting for baseline AHI and body mass index, patients with tongue base collapse showed 3.69 higher odds (1.27-10.73; P = .0128) for response. Complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate (5.32 [1.21-23.28]; P = .0234) and complete laterolateral oropharyngeal collapse (6.62 [1.14-38.34]; P = .0330) related to deterioration. Results for tongue base collapse and complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate were confirmed in the moderate to severe OSA subgroup. Applying these results to this selected subgroup increased response rate with 54% and decreased deterioration rate with 53%. These results were confirmed using other response and deterioration definitions.

CONCLUSIONS

Three baseline DISE phenotypes identified during drug-induced sleep were significantly related to MAD treatment outcome: one beneficial, tongue base collapse, and two adverse, complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate and complete laterolateral oropharyngeal collapse. If confirmed in future prospective studies, these results could guide patient selection for MAD outcome.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This prospective clinical trial (PROMAD) was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov with identifier: NCT01532050.

CITATION

Op de Beeck S, Dieltjens M, Verbruggen AE, Vroegop AV, Wouters K, Hamans E, Willemen M, Verbraecken J, De Backer WA, Van de Heyning PH, Braem MJ, Vanderveken OM. Phenotypic labelling using drug-induced sleep endoscopy improves patient selection for mandibular advancement device outcome: a prospective study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(8):1089-1099.

Effectiveness of different mandibular advancement device designs in obstructive sleep apnoea therapy: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-analysis

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are used to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). To date, there are no data that identify the most effective MAD design for apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) reduction. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of different MAD designs in AHI reduction and oxygen saturation improvement in OSA patients. An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, Scopus, Web of Knowledge and LILACS. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the reduction of AHI on adult patients wearing MAD for OSA were included. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and the risk of bias by the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised controlled trial. The success rate of each study was computed: [(mean baseline AHI - mean AHI after treatment)/mean baseline AHI]. Fifty RCTs were included. The risk of bias resulted with some concerns in most of the studies. The GRADE scores indicated that the quality of evidence was very low. The meta-analysis showed a success rate with mono-bloc and duo-bloc MADs respectively of 0.821 [0.722-0.887] and 0.547 [0.443-0.637]. The mono-bloc compared with duo-bloc better improved the minimum oxygen saturation (10.048 [7.733-12.363] and 3.357 [2.290-4.423], respectively). There is a very low quality body of evidence that mono-bloc MADs are more effective in reducing AHI and improving minimum oxygen saturation compared with duo-bloc MADs. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (n. CRD42019118084).

Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: State of the Art

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) represents a significant global health burden, with impact on cardiometabolic health, chronic disease, productivity loss and accident risk. Oral appliances (OA) are an effective therapy for OSA and work by enlarging and stabilising the pharyngeal airway to prevent breathing obstructions during sleep. Although recommended in clinical guidelines for OSA therapy, they are often considered only as second-line therapy following positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy failure. There has been a long-standing barrier to selecting OA over PAP therapy due to the inability to be certain about the level of efficacy in individual OSA patients. A range of methods to select OSA patients for OA therapy, based on the outcome of a single sleep study night, have been proposed, although none has been widely validated for clinical use. Emergent health outcome data suggest that equivalent apnoea–hypopnea index reduction may not be necessary to produce the same health benefits of PAP. This may be related to the more favourable adherence to OA therapy, which can now be objectively verified. Data on longer term health outcomes are needed, and there are additional opportunities for device improvement and combination therapy approaches. OAs have an important role in precision care of OSA as a chronic disorder through a multi-disciplinary care team. Future studies on real-world health outcomes following OA therapy are needed.

Polysomnographic Endotyping to Select Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea for Oral Appliances

Rationale: Oral appliance therapy is efficacious in many patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but prediction of treatment outcome is challenging. Small, detailed physiological studies have identified key OSA endotypic traits (pharyngeal collapsibility and loop gain) as determinants of greater oral appliance efficacy.Objectives: We used a clinically applicable method to estimate OSA traits from routine polysomnography and identify an endotype-based subgroup of patients expected to show superior efficacy.Methods: In 93 patients (baseline apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], ≥20 events/h), we examined whether polysomnography-estimated OSA traits (pharyngeal: collapsibility and muscle compensation; nonpharyngeal: loop gain, arousal threshold, and ventilatory response to arousal) were associated with oral appliance efficacy (percentage reduction in AHI from baseline) and could predict responses to treatment. Multivariable regression (with interactions) defined endotype-based subgroups of "predicted" responders and nonresponders (based on 50% reduction in AHI). Treatment efficacy was compared between the predicted subgroups (with cross-validation).Results: Greater oral appliance efficacy was associated with favorable nonpharyngeal traits (lower loop gain, higher arousal threshold, and lower response to arousal), moderate (nonmild, nonsevere) pharyngeal collapsibility, and weaker muscle compensation (overall R2 = 0.30; adjusted R2 = 0.19; P = 0.003). Predicted responders (n = 54), compared with predicted nonresponders (n = 39), exhibited a greater reduction in AHI from baseline (mean [95% confidence interval], 73% [66-79] vs. 51% [38-61]; P < 0.0001) and a lower treatment AHI (8 [6-11] vs. 16 [12-20] events/h; P = 0.002). Differences persisted after adjusting for clinical covariates (including baseline AHI, body mass index, and neck circumference).Conclusions: Quantifying OSA traits using clinical polysomnography can identify an endotype-based subgroup of patients that is highly responsive to oral appliance therapy. Prospective validation is warranted.

A New Metric for Precision Medicine: PAP and Hypoglossal Neurostimulation

CITATION

Jacobowitz O, Woodson BT. A new metric for precision medicine: PAP and hypoglossal neurostimulation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(8):1079-1080.

Awake Multimodal Phenotyping for Prediction of Oral Appliance Treatment Outcome

STUDY OBJECTIVES

An oral appliance (OA) is a validated treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, therapeutic response is not certain in any individual and is a clinical barrier to implementing this form of therapy. Therefore, accurate and clinically applicable prediction methods are needed. The goal of this study was to derive prediction models based on multiple awake assessments capturing different aspects of the pharyngeal response to mandibular advancement. We hypothesized that a multimodal model would provide robust prediction.

METHODS

Patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > 10 events/h) were recruited for treatment with a customized OA (n = 142, 59% male). Participants underwent facial photography (craniofacial structure), spirometry (mid-inspiratory flow at 50% vital capacity [MIF₅₀] and mid-expiratory flow at 50% vital capacity [MEF₅₀] and the ratio MEF₅₀/MIF₅₀) and nasopharyngoscopy (velopharyngeal collapse with Mueller maneuver and mandibular advancement). Treatment response was defined by 3 criteria: (1) AHI < 5 events/h plus ≥ 50% reduction, (2) AHI < 10 events/h plus ≥ 50% reduction, (3) ≥ 50% AHI reduction. Multivariable regression models were used to assess predictive utility of phenotypic assessments compared to clinical characteristics alone (age, sex, obesity, baseline AHI).

RESULTS

Craniofacial structure and flow-volume loops predicted treatment response. Accuracy of the prediction models (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) for each criterion were 0.90 (criterion 1), 0.79 (criterion 2), and 0.78 (criterion 3). However, these prediction models including phenotypic assessments did not provide a statistically significant improvement over clinical predictors only.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal awake phenotyping does not enhance OA treatment outcome prediction. These office-based, awake assessments have limited utility for robust clinical prediction models. Future work should focus on sleep-related assessments.

COMMENTARY

A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 1837.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Title: Multimodal phenotyping for the prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnoea, Identifier: ACTRN12611000409976, URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=336663.

Phenotyping Pharyngeal Pathophysiology using Polysomnography in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

RATIONALE

Therapies for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) could be administered on the basis of a patient's own phenotypic causes ("traits") if a clinically applicable approach were available.

OBJECTIVES

Here we aimed to provide a means to quantify two key contributors to OSA-pharyngeal collapsibility and compensatory muscle responsiveness-that is applicable to diagnostic polysomnography.

METHODS

Based on physiological definitions, pharyngeal collapsibility determines the ventilation at normal (eupneic) ventilatory drive during sleep, and pharyngeal compensation determines the rise in ventilation accompanying a rising ventilatory drive. Thus, measuring ventilation and ventilatory drive (e.g., during spontaneous cyclic events) should reveal a patient's phenotypic traits without specialized intervention. We demonstrate this concept in patients with OSA (N = 29), using a novel automated noninvasive method to estimate ventilatory drive (polysomnographic method) and using "gold standard" ventilatory drive (intraesophageal diaphragm EMG) for comparison. Specialized physiological measurements using continuous positive airway pressure manipulation were employed for further comparison. The validity of nasal pressure as a ventilation surrogate was also tested (N = 11).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Polysomnography-derived collapsibility and compensation estimates correlated favorably with those quantified using gold standard ventilatory drive (R = 0.83, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.76, P < 0.0001; respectively) and using continuous positive airway pressure manipulation (R = 0.67, P < 0.0001; and R = 0.64, P < 0.001; respectively). Polysomnographic estimates effectively stratified patients into high versus low subgroups (accuracy, 69-86% vs. ventilatory drive measures; P < 0.05). Traits were near-identical using nasal pressure versus pneumotach (N = 11, R ≥ 0.98, both traits; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Phenotypes of pharyngeal dysfunction in OSA are evident from spontaneous changes in ventilation and ventilatory drive during sleep, enabling noninvasive phenotyping in the clinic. Our approach may facilitate precision therapeutic interventions for OSA.

Therapeutic CPAP Level Predicts Upper Airway Collapsibility in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Study Objectives

Upper airway collapsibility is a key determinant of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) which can influence the efficacy of certain non-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatments for OSA. However, there is no simple way to measure this variable clinically. The present study aimed to develop a clinically implementable tool to evaluate the collapsibility of a patient's upper airway.

Methods

Collapsibility, as characterized by the passive pharyngeal critical closing pressure (Pcrit), was measured in 46 patients with OSA. Associations were investigated between Pcrit and data extracted from patient history and routine polysomnography, including CPAP titration.

Results

Therapeutic CPAP level, demonstrated the strongest relationship to Pcrit (r2=0.51, p < .001) of all the variables investigated including apnea-hypopnea index, body mass index, sex, and age. Patients with a mildly collapsible upper airway (Pcrit ≤ -2 cmH2O) had a lower therapeutic CPAP level (6.2 ± 0.6 vs. 10.3 ± 0.4 cmH2O, p < .001) compared to patients with more severe collapsibility (Pcrit > -2 cmH2O). A therapeutic CPAP level ≤8.0 cmH2O was sensitive (89%) and specific (84%) for detecting a mildly collapsible upper airway. When applied to the independent validation data set (n = 74), this threshold maintained high specificity (91%) but reduced sensitivity (75%).

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that a patient's therapeutic CPAP requirement shares a strong predictive relationship with their Pcrit and may be used to accurately differentiate OSA patients with mild airway collapsibility from those with moderate-to-severe collapsibility. Although this relationship needs to be confirmed prospectively, our findings may provide clinicians with better understanding of an individual patient's OSA phenotype, which ultimately could assist in determining which patients are most likely to respond to non-CPAP therapies.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio decreases in obstructive sleep apnea treated with mandibular advancement devices

PURPOSE

Obstructive sleep apnea has been associated with chronic inflammation triggered by nocturnal hypoxemia. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a measure of subclinical systemic inflammation. We hypothesize that NLR levels would improve as chronic inflammation diminishes in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients treated with mandibular advancement devices (MADs).

METHODS

We studied patients with OSA who were treated with MAD as a first-line treatment or because they could not tolerate CPAP. We obtained pre-treatment and post-treatment complete blood counts. NLR was calculated by dividing the number of neutrophils by the number of lymphocytes obtained from the CBCs. Patients with other conditions known to affect NLR were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

We compared the values of NLR and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) before and after treatment with MAD in 22 patients who met inclusion criteria and completed the study protocol. There was a significant difference in NLR before and after treatment (p = 0.01). There was also a significant difference in the 3% ODI and 4% ODI before and after treatment with MAD (p = 0.014, 0.007), respectively. A subgroup analysis compared NLR in two groups of patients, the optimally treated and suboptimally treated. There was a significant decrease in the NLR in the optimally treated group (n = 10) (p < 0.01), whereas it did not change in the suboptimally treated group (n = 12) (p = 0.349).

CONCLUSION

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be useful in documenting improvement in inflammation for OSA patients treated with mandibular advancement devices. Our results specifically suggest that the NLR values are associated with the decrease in the ODI.

Oral appliance treatment outcome can be predicted by continuous positive airway pressure in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea

Background

Studies show that the therapeutic CPAP pressure is associated with oral appliance (OA) treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. However, these studies included either CPAP adherent patients using fixed pressure devices, or partly CPAP non-adherent patients using fixed pressure or auto-adjusting (auto-CPAP) devices. In many countries, auto-CPAP is predominately used, and only those non-adherent to therapy need a change to OA. Therefore, studies examining the relationship between CPAP pressures and OA treatment outcome should focus on patients non-adherent to auto-CPAP.

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to assess if CPAP pressures predicted OA treatment outcome in patients non-adherent to auto-CPAP therapy.

Methods

The OA treatment responders and non-responders were defined by two success criteria ((1) AHI < 5; (2) 5 ≤ AHI < 10 and > 50% AHI reduction). Logistic regression analyses were performed for CPAP pressures and baseline variables. ROC curve analyses were used to identify CPAP pressure cutoff values, alone and combined with other explanatory variables, predicting the OA treatment outcome.

Results

Eighty-seven patients with moderate or severe OSA were included. Maximum CPAP pressures (CPAPmax) were higher in non-responders by both criteria and were, together with baseline AHI, associated with the OA treatment outcome in multivariate regression analyses. ROC curves identified an optimal CPAPmax cutoff of 12 cm H₂O, corresponding to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.85 in predicting non-response using criterion 1. A prediction model combining CPAPmax > 12 and baseline AHI ≥ 30 had a PPV of 1.0 for non-response by both criteria.

Conclusions

Maximum CPAP pressure was a moderate predictor of OA treatment outcome, but combined with baseline AHI, the ability to identify OA non-responders was high.

Update on Oral Appliance Therapy for OSA

Purpose of Review

The majority of the adult population is affected by obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), according to recent epidemiological research. Oral appliance (OA) therapy is increasingly recommended, particularly for patients with milder OSA. This review updates the evidence in favor of OA therapy.

Recent Findings

A high level of evidence shows that OA is effective in the treatment of OSA, but continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is more efficient. Higher adherence with OAs may compensate for this difference. Daytime sleepiness is better treated with CPAP than with OA in patients with severe OSA. In patients with milder OSA, it is unclear whether sleepiness is significantly reduced. The long-term effectiveness of OAs is uncertain because of side-effects and the risk of OSA deterioration.

Summary

OAs are effective, but their efficacy is more variable than that of CPAP. More research is needed about the mechanism of action of OA, subjective effects and long-term health outcomes.

Obstructive sleep apnoea and the need for its introduction into dental curricula

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a major health problem which causes blood oxygen desaturation that may initiate a cascade of events via inflammatory cytokines and adrenocorticotrophic hormone that may have impact upon quality of life and lead to potential life-threatening events. Even though OSA affects an increasing number of individuals, the role of dental practitioners in recognition, screening and management has not developed accordingly. The goal of this article was to provide updated information to dental practitioners on pathophysiology, consequences and treatment options of OSA with a focused discussion on oral appliance (OA) therapy, as this topic is not routinely included in current dental curricula of many dental schools. Additionally, we present a template dental curriculum for predoctoral and/or postdoctoral students in education regarding sleep disordered breathing.

Response to a combination of oxygen and a hypnotic as treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea is predicted by a patient's therapeutic CPAP requirement

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Upper airway collapsibility predicts the response to several non-continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) interventions for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Measures of upper airway collapsibility cannot be easily performed in a clinical context; however, a patient's therapeutic CPAP requirement may serve as a surrogate measure of collapsibility. The present work aimed to compare the predictive use of CPAP level with detailed physiological measures of collapsibility.

METHODS

Therapeutic CPAP levels and gold-standard pharyngeal collapsibility measures (passive pharyngeal critical closing pressure (P_crit ) and ventilation at CPAP level of 0 cmH₂ O (V_passive )) were retrospectively analysed from a randomized controlled trial (n = 20) comparing the combination of oxygen and eszopiclone (treatment) versus placebo/air control. Responders (9/20) to treatment were defined as those who exhibited a 50% reduction in apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) plus an AHI<15 events/h on-therapy.

RESULTS

Responders to treatment had a lower therapeutic CPAP requirement compared with non-responders (6.6 (5.4-8.1)  cmH₂ O vs 8.9 (8.4-10.4) cmH₂ O, P = 0.007), consistent with their reduced collapsibility (lower P_crit , P = 0.017, higher V_passive P = 0.025). Therapeutic CPAP level provided the highest predictive accuracy for differentiating responders from non-responders (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.86 ± 0.9, 95% CI: 0.68-1.00, P = 0.007). However, both P_crit (AUC = 0.83 ± 0.11, 95% CI: 0.62-1.00, P = 0.017) and V_passive (AUC = 0.77 ± 0.12, 95% CI: 0.53-1.00, P = 0.44) performed well, and the difference in AUC for these three metrics was not statistically different. A therapeutic CPAP level ≤8 cmH₂ O provided 78% sensitivity and 82% specificity (positive predictive value = 78%, negative predictive value = 82%) for predicting a response to these therapies.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic CPAP requirement, as a surrogate measure of pharyngeal collapsibility, predicts the response to non-anatomical therapy (oxygen and eszopiclone) for OSA.

Treatments for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy of current treatment options for adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

Review of the literature.

RESULTS

OSA, characterized by repetitive ≥ 10-second interruptions (apnea) or reductions (hypopnea) in airflow, is initiated by partial or complete collapse in the upper airway despite respiratory effort. When left untreated, OSA is associated with comorbid conditions, such as cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. The current "gold standard" treatment for OSA is continuous positive air pressure (CPAP), which pneumatically stabilizes the upper airways. CPAP has proven efficacy and potential cost savings via decreases in health comorbidities and/or motor-vehicle crashes. However, CPAP treatment is not well-tolerated due to various side effects, and adherence among OSA subjects can be as low as 50% in certain populations. Other treatment options for OSA include improving CPAP tolerability, increasing CPAP adherence through patient interventions, weight loss/exercise, positional therapy, nasal expiratory positive airway pressure, oral pressure therapy, oral appliances, surgery, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, drug treatment, and combining 2 or more of the aforementioned treatments. Despite the many options available to treat OSA, none of them are as efficacious as CPAP. However, many of these treatments are tolerable, and adherence rates are higher than those of the CPAP, making them a more viable treatment option for long-term use.

CONCLUSION

Patients need to weigh the benefits and risks of available treatments for OSA. More large randomized controlled studies on treatments or combination of treatments for OSA are needed that measure parameters such as treatment adherence, apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation, subjective sleepiness, quality of life, and adverse events.

Office management of obstructive sleep apnoea: appliances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Oral appliances are becoming increasingly common in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). They work by advancing the mandible and opening the pharynx. There are several types of devices available for use. Many patients intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are using oral appliances for OSA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Oral appliances have been shown to improve polysomnography, quality of life and health measures associated with OSA. There is current work to better identify patients who are ideal candidates. Development of titratable devices and monitoring are optimizing usage. They have been compared with CPAP, with both showing improvement in OSA; however, CPAP remains superior overall.

SUMMARY

Oral appliances are becoming first-line therapy for mild and moderate OSA. They provide a meaningful alternative in severe OSA for patients unable to use CPAP. Device titration and usage monitoring are beginning to hone oral appliances as a therapeutic option.