Association of Positive Airway Pressure Use With Acute Care Utilization and Costs

The PAP-RES algorithm: Defining who, why and how to use positive airway pressure therapy for OSA

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition that is increasing in prevalence worldwide. Untreated OSA has a negative impact on health-related quality of life and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Despite available data suggesting that cardiovascular risk might differ according to clinical phenotypes and comorbidities, current approaches to OSA treatment usually take a "one size fits all" approach. Identification of cardiovascular vulnerability biomarkers and clinical phenotypes associated with response to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy could help to redefine the standard treatment paradigm. The new PAP-RES (PAP-RESponsive) algorithm is based on the identification of OSA phenotypes that are likely to impact therapeutic goals and modalities. The paradigm shift is to propose a simplified approach that defines therapeutic goals based on OSA phenotype: from a predominantly "symptomatic phenotype" (individuals with high symptom burden that negatively impacts on daily life and/or accident risk or clinically significant insomnia) to a "vulnerable cardiovascular phenotype" (individuals with comorbidities [serious cardiovascular or respiratory disease or obesity] that have a negative impact on cardiovascular prognosis or a biomarker of hypoxic burden and/or autonomic nervous system dysfunction). Each phenotype requires a different PAP therapy care pathway based on differing health issues and treatment objectives.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Sleep Apnea Management: A Critical Evaluation of the Impact of Therapy on Health Care Costs

TOPIC IMPORTANCE

OSA is a widespread condition that significantly affects both health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). If left untreated, OSA can lead to accidents, decreased productivity, and medical complications, resulting in significant economic burdens including the direct costs of managing the disorder. Given the constraints on health care resources, understanding the cost-effectiveness of OSA management is crucial. A key factor in cost-effectiveness is whether OSA therapies reduce medical costs associated with OSA-related complications.

REVIEW FINDINGS

Treatments for OSA have been shown to enhance HRQoL, particularly for symptomatic patients with moderate or severe disease. Economic studies also have demonstrated that these treatments are highly cost-effective. However, although substantial empirical evidence shows that untreated OSA is associated with increased medical costs, uncertainty remains about the impact of OSA treatment on these costs. Randomized controlled trials of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy have failed to demonstrate cost reductions, but the studies have had important limitations. Observational studies suggest that PAP therapy may temper increases in costs, but only among patients who are highly adherent to treatment. However, the healthy adherer effect is an important potential source of bias in these studies.

SUMMARY

OSA management is cost-effective, although uncertainties persist regarding the therapy's impact on medical costs. Future studies should focus on reducing bias, particularly the healthy adherer effect, and addressing other confounding factors to clarify potential medical cost savings. Promising avenues to further understanding include using quasiexperimental designs, incorporating more sophisticated characterization of OSA severity and symptoms, and leveraging newer technologies (eg, big data, wearables, and artificial intelligence).

Performance of Claims-Based Algorithms for Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Commercially Insured Patients With OSA

BACKGROUND

Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is first-line therapy for OSA, but consistent use is required for it to be effective. Previous studies have used Medicare fee-for-service claims data (eg, device, equipment charges) as a proxy for PAP adherence to assess its effects. However, this approach has not been validated in a US commercially insured population, where coverage rules are not standardized.

RESEARCH QUESTION

In a commercially insured population in the United States, how well do claims-based algorithms for defining PAP adherence correspond with objective PAP device usage?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Deidentified administrative claims data of commercially insured patients (aged 18-64 years) with OSA were linked to objective PAP therapy usage data from cloud-connected devices. Adherence was defined based on device use (using an extension of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 90-day compliance criteria) and from claims-based algorithms to compare usage metrics and identify potential misclassifications.

RESULTS

The final sample included 213,341 patients. Based on device usage, 48% were adherent in the first year. Based on claims, between 10% and 84% of patients were identified as adherent (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity ranges: 53%-68%, 12%-95%, and 26%-92%, respectively). Relative to patients who were claims-adherent, patients who were device-adherent had consistently higher usage across all metrics (mean, 339.9 vs 260.0-290.0 days of use; 6.6 vs 5.1-5.6 d/wk; 6.4 vs 4.6-5.2 h/d). Consistent PAP users were frequently identified by claims-based algorithms as nonadherent, whereas many inconsistent users were classified by claims-based algorithms as adherent.

INTERPRETATION

In aggregate US commercial data with nonstandardized PAP coverage rules, concordance between existing claims-based definitions and objective PAP use was low. Caution is warranted when applying existing claims-based algorithms to commercial populations.

The economic cost of obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease associated with a high prevalence of costly comorbidities and accidents that add to the disease's economic impact. Although more attention has been focused on OSA in recent years, no previous systematic reviews have synthesized findings from existing studies that provide estimates of the economic cost of OSA. This study aims to summarize the findings of existing studies that provide estimates of the cost of OSA. Two bibliographic databases, PubMed and Scopus, were used to identify articles on the costs of OSA. The systematic literature review identified 5,938 publications, of which 31 met the inclusion criteria. According to the results, adjusted for inflation and converted to euros, the annual cost per patient ranged from €236 (the incremental cost of OSA) for New Zealand to €28,267 for the United States. The total annual cost per patient in Europe ranged from €1,669 to €5,186. OSA causes a significant burden on society, and OSA-related costs increase many years before the diagnosis and remain elevated for a long time after the diagnosis. Despite some well-conducted studies, the cost estimates for OSA are uncertain and specific to the context in which the study was conducted.

Healthcare resource utilisation and costs in patients with treated obstructive sleep apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent yet underdiagnosed disease that creates a large economic burden on the United States healthcare system. In this retrospective study, we tested the hypothesis that adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, the 'gold standard' treatment for OSA, is associated with reduced healthcare resource utilisation and costs. We linked de-identified payer-sourced medical claims and objective PAP usage data for patients newly diagnosed with OSA. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to create balanced groups of patients who were either adherent, intermediately adherent, or non-adherent to PAP therapy. From a sample of 179,542 patients (average age 52.5 years, 61% male), 37% were adherent, 40% intermediate, and 23% non-adherent. During the first year, PAP adherence was significantly associated with fewer emergency room visits (mean [SD] adherent: 0.39 [1.20] versus intermediate: 0.47 [1.30], p < 0.001; versus non-adherent: 0.54 [1.44], p < 0.001), all-cause hospitalisations (mean [SD] adherent: 0.09 [0.43] versus intermediate: 0.12 [0.51], p < 0.001; versus non-adherent: 0.13 [0.55], p < 0.001), and lower total costs (mean [SD] adherent $5874 [8045] versus intermediate $6523 [9759], p < 0.001; versus non-adherent $6355 [10,517], p < 0.001). Results were similar in the second year of PAP use. These results provide additional evidence from a large, diverse sample to support the diagnosis and treatment of OSA and encourage long-term adherence to PAP therapy.

Pilot study of positive airway pressure usage, patient journey and program engagement for users of a digital obstructive sleep apnea program

Purpose

This single-arm, decentralized pilot study assessed patient journey, positive airway pressure (PAP) usage and program satisfaction for users of an entirely virtual telemedicine program for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis and management. This analysis focuses specifically on the subset of participants in the program who were diagnosed with OSA and prescribed PAP therapy.

Methods

The Verily Clinical Studies Platform was used for virtual screening, consent, and enrolling eligible patients from North Carolina and Texas. After completing the virtual OSA diagnosis process, participants diagnosed with OSA and prescribed PAP therapy downloaded the program's mobile app. The app featured tools such as educational content, live coaching support, and motivational enhancement.

Results

Of the patients included in this analysis (N = 105), the majority were female (58%), and white (90%). The mean time from first televisit to PAP initiation was 29.2 (SD 12.8) days and f 68 out of the 105 patients (65%) reached 90-day adherence. On average, patients used their PAP device for 4.4 h per day, and 5.4 h on days used. Engagement with the app was associated with higher rates of PAP adherence. Adherent individuals used the mobile app 52 out of the 90 days on average, compared to non-adherent individuals who used the app on 35 out of the 90 days on average (p = 0.0003).

Conclusions

All of the 105 patients in this program diagnosed with OSA and prescribed PAP therapy were able to efficiently complete the entire OSA diagnostic pathway. The majority of these individuals also were able to adhere to their prescribed PAP therapy and had clinically meaningful PAP usage rates over the 90 days of therapy. Future studies might further evaluate the impact of this type of end-to-end virtual program on longer-term adherence and clinical outcomes over time.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04599803?term=NCT04599803&draw=2&rank=1, identifier NCT04599803.

Association Between Positive Airway Pressure Adherence and Health Care Costs Among Individuals With OSA

BACKGROUND

The impact of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for OSA on health care costs is uncertain.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are 3-year health care costs associated with PAP adherence in participants from the Tele-OSA clinical trial?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants with OSA and prescribed PAP in the Tele-OSA study were stratified into three PAP adherence groups based on usage patterns over 3 years: (1) high (consistently ≥ 4 h/night), (2) moderate (2-3.9 h/night or inconsistently ≥ 4 h/night), and (3) low (< 2 h/night). Using data from 3 months of the Tele-OSA trial and 33 months of posttrial follow up, average health care costs (2020 US dollars) in 6-month intervals were derived from electronic health records and analyzed using multivariable generalized linear models.

RESULTS

Of 543 participants, 25% were categorized as having high adherence, 22% were categorized as having moderate adherence, and 52% were categorized as having low adherence to PAP therapy. Average PAP use mean ± SD was 6.5 ± 1.0 h, 3.7 ± 1.2 h, and 0.5 ± 0.5 h for the high, moderate, and low adherence groups, respectively. The high adherence group had the lowest average covariate-adjusted 6-month health care costs ± SE ($3,207 ± $251) compared with the moderate ($3,638 ± $363) and low ($4,040 ± $304) adherence groups. Significant cost differences were observed between the high and low adherence groups ($832; 95% CI, $127 to $1,538); differences between moderate and low adherence were nonsignificant ($401; 95% CI, -$441 to $1,243).

INTERPRETATION

In participants with OSA, better PAP adherence was associated with significantly lower health care costs over 3 years. Findings support the importance of strategies to enhance long-term PAP adherence.

Association between positive airway pressure therapy adherence and health care resource utilization in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes in the United States

STUDY OBJECTIVES

There is a complex interplay between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and type 2 diabetes. There are minimal data regarding the effects of treating OSA with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy on outcomes and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with OSA and type 2 diabetes. We investigated the impact of PAP adherence on HCRU and costs in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted with a cohort of OSA patient from a US administrative claims dataset linked to objective device data (AirView, ResMed Corp., San Diego, California). Propensity score matching was used to control for potential imbalance in baseline covariates between PAP-adherent and -nonadherent patients. Newly diagnosed patients with OSA aged ≥ 18 years with type 2 diabetes were included. PAP adherence was defined as meeting Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services compliance criteria in all 8 90-day periods over 2 years. HCRU was based on the number of all-cause doctor visits, emergency room visits, inpatient hospitalizations, and PAP equipment and supplies.

RESULTS

In years 1 and 2 of PAP therapy, HCRU was significantly lower in adherent vs nonadherent patients (number/patient for emergency room visits 0.68 ± 1.47 vs 0.99 ± 1.91 [year 1], 0.69 ± 1.43 vs 0.95 ± 1.89 [year 2]; for hospitalizations 0.16 ± 0.58 vs 0.22 ± 0.62 [year 1], 0.15 ± 0.51 vs 0.21 ± 0.74 [year 2]; all P < .001). Changes in estimated total 24-month payments were higher for nonadherent patients ($2,282, 95% confidence interval: $1,368, $3,205).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent use of PAP therapy over 2 years was associated with decreased HCRU in patients with OSA and type 2 diabetes, strongly suggesting a role for screening and treating OSA in type 2 diabetes.

CITATION

Sterling KL, Cistulli PA, Linde-Zwirble W, et al. Association between positive airway pressure therapy adherence and health care resource utilization in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes in the United States. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(3):563-571.

Obstructive sleep apnea screening, diagnosis, and treatment in the transportation industry

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common, identifiable, and treatable disorder with serious health, safety, and financial implications-including sleepiness- related crashes and incidents-in workers who perform safety-sensitive functions in the transportation industry. Up to one-third of crashes of large trucks are attributable to sleepiness, and large truck crashes result in more than 4,000 deaths annually. For each occupant of a truck who is killed, 6 to 7 occupants of other vehicles are killed. Treatment of OSA is cost-effective, lowers crash rates, and improves health and well-being. A large body of scientific evidence and expert consensus supports the identification and treatment of OSA in transportation operators. An Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding the diagnosis and treatment of OSA in commercial truck and rail operators was issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and Federal Railroad Administration, but it was later withdrawn. This reversal of the agencies' position has caused confusion among some, who have questioned whether efforts to identify and treat the disorder are warranted. In response, we urge key stakeholders, including employers, operators, legislators, payers, clinicians, and patients, to engage in a collaborative, patient-centered approach to address the disorder. At a minimum, stakeholders should follow the guidelines issued by a medical review board commissioned by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration in 2016 alone, or in combination with the 2006 criteria, "Sleep Apnea and Commercial Motor Vehicle Operators," a Statement from the Joint Task Force of the American College of Chest Physicians, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and the National Sleep Foundation developed by a joint task force. As research in this area continues to evolve, waiting is no longer an option, and the current standard of care demands action to mitigate the burden of serious health and safety risks due to this common, treatable disorder.

CITATION

Das AM, Chang JL, Berneking M, Hartenbaum NP, Rosekind M, Gurubhagavatula I. Obstructive sleep apnea screening, diagnosis, and treatment in the transportation industry. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(10):2471-2479.

Electronic health record-derived outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea managed with positive airway pressure tracking systems

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) management guided by CPAP machine downloads in newly diagnosed patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using electronic health record-derived health care utilization, biometric variables, and laboratory data.

METHODS

Electronic health record data of patients seen at the University of Utah Sleep Program from 2012-2015 were reviewed to identify patients with new diagnosis of OSA in whom CPAP adherence and residual apnea-hypopnea index as measured by a positive airway pressure adherence tracking device data for ≥ 1 year were available. Biometric data, laboratory data, and system-wide charges were compared in the 1 year before and after CPAP therapy. Subgroups were divided by whether patients met tracking criteria, mean nightly usage, and OSA severity.

RESULTS

976 consecutive, newly diagnosed participants with OSA (median age 55 years, 56.6% male) met inclusion criteria. There was a mean decrease of systolic blood pressure (BP) of 1.2 mm Hg and diastolic BP of 1.0 mm Hg within a year of initiation of CPAP therapy. BP improvements in the subgroup meeting CPAP tracking targets were 1.36 mmHg (systolic) and 1.37 mmHg (diastolic). No significant change was noted in body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, or serum creatinine values within a year of starting CPAP therapy, and health care utilization increased (mean acute care visits 0.22 per year to 0.53 per year; mean charges of $3,997 per year to $8,986 per year).

CONCLUSIONS

An improvement in BP was noted within a year of CPAP therapy in newly diagnosed patients with OSA, with no difference in the magnitude of improvement between those meeting tracking system adherence targets.

CITATION

Locke BW, Neill SE, Howe HE, Crotty MC, Kim J, Sundar KM. Electronic health record-derived outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea managed with positive airway pressure tracking systems. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(3):885-894.

Assessment of Patient Journey Metrics for Users of a Digital Obstructive Sleep Apnea Program: Single-Arm Feasibility Pilot Study

Background

Despite the importance of diagnosis and treatment, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remains a vastly underdiagnosed condition; this is partially due to current OSA identification methods and a complex and fragmented diagnostic pathway.

Objective

This prospective, single-arm, multistate feasibility pilot study aimed to understand the journey in a nonreferred sample of participants through the fully remote OSA screening and diagnostic and treatment pathway, using the Primasun Sleep Apnea Program (formally, Verily Sleep Apnea Program).

Methods

Participants were recruited online from North Carolina and Texas to participate in the study entirely virtually. Eligible participants were invited to schedule a video telemedicine appointment with a board-certified sleep physician who could order a home sleep apnea test (HSAT) to be delivered to the participant's home. The results were interpreted by the sleep physician and communicated to the participant during a second video telemedicine appointment. The participants who were diagnosed with OSA during the study and prescribed a positive airway pressure (PAP) device were instructed to download an app that provides educational and support-related content and access to personalized coaching support during the study’s 90-day PAP usage period. Surveys were deployed throughout the study to assess baseline characteristics, prior knowledge of sleep apnea, and satisfaction with the program.

Results

For the 157 individuals who were ordered an HSAT, it took a mean of 7.4 (SD 2.6) days and median 7.1 days (IQR 2.0) to receive their HSAT after they completed their first televisit appointment. For the 114 individuals who were diagnosed with OSA, it took a mean of 13.9 (SD 9.6) days and median 11.7 days (IQR 10.1) from receiving their HSAT to being diagnosed with OSA during their follow-up televisit appointment. Overall, the mean and median time from the first televisit appointment to receiving an OSA diagnosis was 21.4 (SD 9.6) days and 18.9 days (IQR 9.2), respectively. For those who were prescribed PAP therapy, it took a mean of 8.1 (SD 9.3) days and median 6.0 days (IQR 4.0) from OSA diagnosis to PAP therapy initiation.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate the possibility of a highly efficient, patient-centered pathway for OSA workup and treatment. Such findings support pathways that could increase access to care, reduce loss to follow-up, and reduce health burden and overall cost. The program’s ability to efficiently diagnose patients who otherwise may have not been diagnosed with OSA is important, especially during a pandemic, as the United States shifted to remote care models and may sustain this direction. The potential economic and clinical impact of the program’s short and efficient journey time and low attrition rate should be further examined in future analyses. Future research also should examine how a fast and positive diagnosis experience impacts success rates for PAP therapy initiation and adherence.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04599803; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04599803

Apnoea-hypopnoea indices determined via continuous positive airway pressure (AHI-CPAPflow) versus those determined by polysomnography (AHI-PSGgold): a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To date, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains the cornerstone of obstructive sleep apnoea treatment. CPAP data describing residual sleep-disordered breathing events (ie, the CPAP-measured apnoea-hypopnoea indices (AHI-CPAP_flow)) is difficult to interpret because it is an entirely different metric than the polysomnography (PSG) measured AHI gold standard (AHI-PSG_gold). Moreover, manufacturer definitions for apnoea and hypopnoea are not only different from those recommended for PSG scoring, but also different between manufacturers. In the context of CPAP initiation and widespread telemedicine at home to facilitate sleep apnoea care, there is a need for concrete evidence that AHI-CPAP_flow can be used as a surrogate for AHI-PSG_gold.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

No published systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) has compared the accuracy of AHI-CPAP_flow against AHI-PSG_gold and the primary objective of this study is therefore to do so using published data. The secondary objectives are to similarly evaluate other sleep disordered breathing indices and to perform subgroup analyses focusing on the inclusion/exclusion of central apnoea patients, body mass index levels, CPAP device brands, pressure titration modes, use of a predetermined and fixed pressure level or not, and the impact of a 4% PSG desaturation criteria versus 3% PSG on accuracy. The Preferred Reporting Items for SRMA protocols statement guided study design. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies of adult patients (≥18 years old) treated by a CPAP device will be included. The CPAP intervention and PSG comparator must be performed synchronously. PSGs must be scored manually and follow the American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines (2007 AASM criteria or more recent). To assess the risk of bias in each study, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool will be used.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol received ethics committee approval on 16 July 2020 (IRB_MTP_2020_07_2020000404) and results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications.

PROSPERO/TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

CRD42020159914/NCT04526366; Pre-results.

Value-based sleep and breathing: health economic aspects of obstructive sleep apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common and costly medical condition. Untreated OSA is associated with numerous and well-documented adverse health consequences including depression, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and premature death. In addition to these health consequences, untreated OSA is also associated with substantial costs borne by patients, payers, the health system, and society at large. Perhaps more importantly, evidence suggests that OSA treatment is associated with positive economic benefit. The purpose of this brief review is to introduce economic aspects of OSA, including the potential economic benefit of OSA treatment.