Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. A potentially malignant syndrome

Autoimmune Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Autoimmune thrombocytopenia (aHIT) is a severe subtype of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with atypical clinical features caused by highly pathological IgG antibodies ("aHIT antibodies") that activate platelets even in the absence of heparin. The clinical features of aHIT include: the onset or worsening of thrombocytopenia despite stopping heparin ("delayed-onset HIT"), thrombocytopenia persistence despite stopping heparin ("persisting" or "refractory HIT"), or triggered by small amounts of heparin (heparin "flush" HIT), most cases of fondaparinux-induced HIT, and patients with unusually severe HIT (e.g., multi-site or microvascular thrombosis, overt disseminated intravascular coagulation [DIC]). Special treatment approaches are required. For example, unlike classic HIT, heparin cessation does not result in de-escalation of antibody-induced hemostasis activation, and thus high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may be indicated to interrupt aHIT-induced platelet activation; therapeutic plasma exchange may be required if high-dose IVIG is ineffective. Also, aHIT patients are at risk for treatment failure with (activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT]-adjusted) direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) therapy (argatroban, bivalirudin), either because of APTT confounding (where aHIT-associated DIC and resulting APTT prolongation lead to systematic underdosing/interruption of DTI therapy) or because DTI inhibits thrombin-induced protein C activation. Most HIT laboratories do not test for aHIT antibodies, contributing to aHIT under-recognition.

Cerebral Venous Thrombosis in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) has recently been reported as a common thrombotic manifestation in association with vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia, a syndrome that mimics heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and occurs after vaccination with adenovirus-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. We aimed to systematically review the incidence, clinical features, and prognosis of CVT occurring in patients with HIT.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021249652). MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up to June 1, 2021 for HIT case series including >20 patients, or any report of HIT-related CVT. Demographic, neuroradiological, clinical, and mortality data were retrieved. Meta-analysis of proportions with random-effect modeling was used to derive rate of CVT in HIT and in-hospital mortality. Pooled estimates were compared with those for CVT without HIT and HIT without CVT, to determine differences in mortality.

RESULTS

From 19073 results, we selected 23 case series of HIT (n=1220) and 27 cases of HIT-related CVT (n=27, 71% female). CVT developed in 1.6% of 1220 patients with HIT (95% CI,1.0%-2.5%, I²=0%). Hemorrhagic brain lesions occurred in 81.8% of cases of HIT-related CVT and other concomitant thrombosis affecting other vascular territory was reported in 47.8% of cases. In-hospital mortality was 33.3%. HIT-related CVT carried a 29% absolute increase in mortality rate compared with historical CVT controls (33.3% versus 4.3%, P<0.001) and a 17.4% excess mortality compared with HIT without CVT (33.3% versus 15.9%, P=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

CVT is a rare thrombotic manifestation in patients with HIT. HIT-related CVT has higher rates of intracerebral hemorrhage and a higher mortality risk, when compared with CVT in historical controls. The recently reported high frequency of CVT in patients with vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia was not observed in HIT, suggesting that additional pathophysiological mechanisms besides anti-platelet factor-4 antibodies might be involved in vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia-related CVT.

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This chapter about the recognition, treatment, and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patient values may lead to different choices. Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients receiving heparin in whom the clinician considers the risk of HIT to be > 1.0%, we recommend platelet count monitoring over no platelet count monitoring (Grade 1C). For patients who are receiving heparin or have received heparin within the previous 2 weeks, we recommend investigating for a diagnosis of HIT if the platelet count falls by >/= 50%, and/or a thrombotic event occurs, between days 5 and 14 (inclusive) following initiation of heparin, even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia has occurred (Grade 1C). For patients with strongly suspected (or confirmed) HIT, whether or not complicated by thrombosis, we recommend use of an alternative, nonheparin anticoagulant (danaparoid [Grade 1B], lepirudin [Grade 1C], argatroban [Grade 1C], fondaparinux [Grade 2C], or bivalirudin [Grade 2C]) over the further use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy or initiation/continuation of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) [Grade 1B]. The guidelines include specific recommendations for nonheparin anticoagulant dosing that differ from the package inserts. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT, we recommend against the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [coumarin] therapy until after the platelet count has substantially recovered (usually, to at least 150 x 10(9)/L) over starting VKA therapy at a lower platelet count (Grade 1B); that VKA therapy be started only with low maintenance doses (maximum, 5 mg of warfarin or 6 mg of phenprocoumon) over higher initial doses (Grade 1B); and that the nonheparin anticoagulant (eg, lepirudin, argatroban, danaparoid) be continued until the platelet count has reached a stable plateau, the international normalized ratio (INR) has reached the intended target range, and after a minimum overlap of at least 5 days between nonheparin anticoagulation and VKA therapy rather than a shorter overlap (Grade 1B). For patients receiving VKAs at the time of diagnosis of HIT, we recommend use of vitamin K (10 mg po or 5 to 10 mg IV) [Grade 1C].

Spontaneous superior sagittal sinus thrombosis secondary to type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presenting as an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage

Cerebral sinus thrombosis is a rare cause of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. The development of cerebral sinus thrombosis as a complication of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is even rarer. In this paper, we present a 59-year-old patient admitted to our service with cerebral sinus thrombosis secondary to type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. We also review the literature in regard to the incidence, pathophysiology and management of this rare clinicopathological entity.

[Sinus vein thrombosis. A rare complication of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II]

In the past 10 years numerous reports of cases referring to complications and their outcome with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) have been published. Clinically these symptoms are manifested as a combination of arterial and venous thromboembolisms. Mostly affected are the vessels of the limbs, the abdomen, kidneys and coronary arteries. We present the most rare initial manifestations of cerebral symptoms with headache, nausea, change of character and generalised convulsion, which have found their origin in sinus vein thrombosis and the treatment with the heparinoid danaparoid.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially serious complication of heparin therapy and is being encountered more frequently in patients with cardiovascular disease as use of anticoagulant therapy becomes more widespread. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of this immune-mediated condition has improved in recent years, with heparin-platelet factor 4 complex as the culprit antigen in most patients. New sensitive laboratory assays for the pathogenic antibody are now available and should permit an earlier, more reliable diagnosis, but their optimal application remains to be defined. For patients in whom HIT is diagnosed, immediate discontinuation of heparin infusions and elimination of heparin from all flushes and ports are mandatory. Further management of patients with HIT is problematic at present, as there are no readily available alternative anticoagulant agents in the United States with proven efficacy in acute coronary disease. The direct thrombin inhibitors appear to be the most promising alternatives to heparin, when continued use of heparin is contraindicated, and the results of several multicenter trials evaluating their application in patients with HIT are awaited.

Coagulation disorders in cancer

Coagulation disorders are common in cancer patients. This article reviews the coagulation laboratory findings in these patients and the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic manifestations of malignancy. Among the many topics addressed are Trousseau's syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and acquired von Willebrand disease. Pathogenesis of the coagulation disorders and recommendations for treatment of various syndromes are discussed.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Thrombocytopenia is a common adverse effect of heparin therapy. Two types of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are observed clinically--an early onset mild thrombocytopenia (Type I) in which the patients remain asymptomatic and a delayed onset severe thrombocytopenia (Type II). Patients with Type II HIT have an increased risk of thrombotic complications which frequently cause crippling disability e.g. limb amputation or even death. Type I HIT, the commoner of the two types, is believed to be due to the platelet proaggregating effect of heparin itself but Type II HIT is generally agreed to be caused by an immune mechanism, in which heparin-antibody complexes bind to platelets resulting in platelet activation, reduced platelet survival, thrombocytopenia and, in some cases, thrombosis. The diagnosis of HIT is made mainly on a clinical basis but in patients with suspected Type II HIT, laboratory test for the heparin-dependent antibody using platelet aggregometry or the two-point 14C-serotonin release method, allows confirmation of the diagnosis. In most Type I and all Type II patients, heparin should be stopped and warfarin commenced if there is a recent or new thrombosis requiring continuing anticoagulation. An alternative antithrombotic drug such as low molecular weight heparinoid (Org 10172) or dextran should be given at the same time until warfarin becomes therapeutic. The use of low molecular weight heparins (e.g. Fragmin) should be avoided unless it can be demonstrated that the HIT antibody does not cross-react with these drugs.

Cerebral venous thrombosis due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A patient with polycythemia vera who was treated with heparin for superficial septic thrombophlebitis developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cerebral venous thrombosis with superior sagittal sinus occlusion 11 days after the institution of heparin therapy. We suggest that the severe thrombotic response to the heparin-induced platelet disorder in this patient occurred because the polycythemia vera and the purulent infection enhanced the thrombophilia caused by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. This condition can be avoided in most instances if heparin is used for no longer than 5 days.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

There are two types of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Type I is more common, has an early onset, and is mild, transient, and benign. Type I is due to direct heparin-induced platelet aggregation and is rarely associated with thromboembolic sequela. Type II is infrequent, has a late onset, and is more severe. Type II is due to an immune-mediated platelet aggregation caused by IgG and IgM that becomes bound to platelets. In Type II, the antibody titers decline over several months; however, early reexposure can result in a catastrophic secondary immune response. Frequently, Type II is associated with life- or limb-threatening thromboembolic complications (white clots), including stroke.

Effect of heparin on platelet count and platelet aggregation

The in vitro effect of heparin on platelet aggregation was studied in three groups: in 26 subjects recently treated with heparin, in 18 subjects on maintenance hemodialysis, and in 20 normal controls. With the aid of Technicon H6000, platelet counts and platelet aggregations were compared in whole blood samples collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and in heparinized tubes. Although there was no significant difference between platelet count of heparinized and EDTA blood in the control group, the dialysis group and the group recently treated with heparin showed significantly lower platelet counts and more platelet aggregation in heparinized tubes than in EDTA tubes. We speculate that the majority of subjects exposed to heparin develop an antibody or a proaggregator which can aggregate or agglutinate platelets in the presence of heparin and causes destruction of platelets; but only in a small percentage of subjects receiving heparin is this reaction severe enough to cause thrombocytopenia.

Hypersensitivity reactions to heparin: delayed onset thrombocytopenia and necrotizing skin lesions

Significant hypersensitivity reactions to heparin may manifest as either delayed onset thrombocytopenia or as necrotizing skin lesions. Such hypersensitivity reactions are uncommonly recognized, partly because of their rarity and partly because their existence is not widely appreciated. Both adverse reactions may be readily diagnosed. In the presence of these reactions, continuing heparin therapy may lead to serious thrombo-embolic complications and death of the patient. In this study, two patients who highlight the clinical settings of these reactions are discussed with reference to their pathogenesis and clinical significance.

Heparin-induced skin reaction

A case of heparin-induced skin reaction at the sites of subcutaneous injections is reported. The clinical details of 15 previously reported cases are summarized, and the importance of recognizing this complication is discussed.