Concordance between use of proton pump inhibitors and prescribing guidelines

Impact of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Discontinuation Guidance in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Patients: A Pre-Post Cohort Study

Purpose

Recent data highlight unclear efficacy and potential negative sequelae of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Minimizing SUP exposure has pertinent clinical and other implications. This study assessed medication use and clinical outcomes before and after implementation of a practice guideline promoting early discontinuation of SUP in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Methods

Retrospective, single-center, pre-post cohort study within a medical ICU at a large, academic medical center. Adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation and receiving SUP via a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) or proton pump inhibitor (PPI) were eligible for inclusion. The clinical practice guideline was implemented on January 1, 2020. The impact of implementation was assessed via percent of patient-days with inappropriate SUP. Incidence of clinically important GI bleed was the primary safety outcome.

Results

A total of 137 pre-guideline and 112 post-guideline patients were included. Comorbidity burden was similar between groups. A higher prevalence of baseline vasopressor receipt (39% vs 67%, P < .01) and acute kidney injury (56% vs 69%, P = .04) was observed in post-guideline patients. Post-guideline patients experienced a significantly lower percentage of patient-days of inappropriate SUP (25% vs 50%, P < .01) as well as higher rates of SUP discontinuation before extubation (71% vs 12%, P < .01) and during ICU stay (93% vs 50%, P < .01). Post-guideline patients observed a significantly lower incidence of SUP at hospital discharge (4% vs 35%, P < .01). No differences in bleeding outcomes were observed, though post-guideline patients experienced longer durations of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital stay.

Conclusions

Implementation of an early SUP discontinuation guideline was associated with significant improvements in SUP prescribing practices. Baseline differences between groups likely explain observed differences in clinical outcomes.

Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Hungary: Mixed-Method Study to Reveal Scale and Characteristics

Background

Due to their efficacy and tolerability, utilization of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) has significantly increased worldwide. Parallel to the clinical benefits, potential long-term side effects have been observed, which, along with increasing medical expenses and potential drug interactions, justifies the analysis of the trends of utilization.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to show the level, pattern, and characteristics of PPI use.

Methods

We assessed the nationwide use of proton pump inhibitors in ambulatory care based on aggregated utilization data from the National Health Insurance database. The annual PPI utilization was expressed as the number of packages and as number of DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants and per year. For 2018, we estimated PPI exposure as the number of packages and as the number of DDDs per user per year. The annual reimbursement costs of proton pump inhibitors were also calculated. Moreover, three patient-level surveys were carried out in non-gastroenterological inpatient hospital departments to reveal characteristics of proton pump inhibitor use, namely dose, duration, and indication.

Results

The PPI utilisation increased from 5867.8 thousand to 7124.9 thousand packages and from 41.9 to 50.4 DDD per 1,000 inhabitants and per day between 2014 and 2018. Nationwide data showed that 14% of the adult population was exposed to proton pump inhibitors in 2018, while among hospitalized patients, the prevalence of proton pump inhibitor use was between 44.5% and 54.1%. Pantoprazole was the most frequently used active ingredient, both in the nationwide data and in the patient-level surveys. In the patient-level survey in majority of patients (71.5%-80.0%) proton pump inhibitors were prescribed for prophylaxis. Many inpatients (29.4%-36.9%) used 80 mg pantoprazole per day. The average number of PPI packages per user was 6.5 in 2018 in the nationwide data. The duration of PPI therapy was typically between 1 and 5 years in the patient-level surveys and nearly 20% of the inpatients had been taking proton pump inhibitors for more than 5 years.

Conclusions

Our data suggests that Hungarian patients receive proton pump inhibitors in high doses and for a long time. Use of proton pump inhibitors beyond their recommended indications was also found.

Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in an Academic, Primary Care Clinic: Quality Improvement Project

GOAL

The goal of this study was to reduce the percentage of inappropriately prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients aged 50 and older from 80% (baseline) to 60% within 12 months in an academic, internal medicine clinic.

BACKGROUND

The use of PPIs has increased drastically worldwide. Internal medicine clinic patients had inappropriate use of PPIs for an average of 4 to 5 years.

STUDY

A multidisciplinary quality improvement team used the Plan-Do-Study-Act Model of health care improvement and performed a root cause analysis to identify barriers to inappropriate use of PPIs. The outcome measure was the percentage of patients inappropriately prescribed PPI. Process measures were completion rates of PPI risk assessment and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Interventions included the creation of customized electronic health record templates and education to providers and patients. Analysis was performed using monthly statistical process control charts.

RESULTS

The average rate of PPI discontinuation was 51.1% (n=92/180), which corresponds to 30.0% inappropriate PPI usage within 12 months. The mean PPI discontinuation rate in the 1-year prestudy, study and 6 months poststudy period was 2.0%, 32.0%, and 49.7%, respectively. The mean esophagogastroduodenoscopy completion rate was 49.8% from the baseline of <30%.

CONCLUSIONS

We achieved a statistically significant and sustainable reduction of inappropriate PPI use to 30% from the baseline rates of 80% and surpassed our goal within 12 months. This quality improvement was unique as no pharmacy personnel was utilized in this process. The multifaceted strategies in a safety-net internal medicine clinic resulted in successful deprescribing of PPI and can be replicated in other setting.

Attitude and knowledge of Saudi community pharmacists towards use of proton pump inhibitors

Introduction

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) effectively suppress acid secretion and play an important role in peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease. There is a real concern about the overutilization of PPIs, which will lead to significant high cost and undesirable outcomes. Despite that most of PPIs are classified as prescribed medications, yet most of their users take them without prescription in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, it was important to understand community pharmacists practice in dealing with PPIs and to evaluate their despising pattern of these medications.

Method

A cross-sectional survey-based study that was carried out between September and December 2017. The survey intended to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of CPs towards use of proton pump inhibitors and was built as an online survey.

Results

The results of this study showed that almost all CPs prescribe anti-ulcer drugs for their patients. Most of the participants (68.4%) have prescribed PPI for acute gastritis (68.4%), prophylaxis for stress ulcers (17.7%) and stress ulcer (11.1%). 54.9 percent of the participants recommend using acid suppression drugs for 1 to 2 weeks when they prescribe them to their patients. Thirty-two percent of the respondents had reported adverse events with PPIs. The study showed a significant association between length of work experience in community pharmacy and reporting adverse events.

Conclusion

Community pharmacists in Saudi Arabia usually recommend and prescribe PPIs to their patients. Most of them have some knowledge on PPIs indications and side effects. Managing OTC PPI use in the community pharmacy setting is necessary to promote both patient and medication safety.

A Multifaceted Intervention to Reduce Pediatric Acid-Suppressant Prescriptions for Gastroesophageal Reflux: What Have We Learned?

OBJECTIVE

Acid-suppressant prescriptions for children have increased over past decades, despite guideline recommendations to prescribe prudently. Acid suppressants are often ineffective and may lead to side effects. We aimed to reduce inappropriate acid-suppressant prescriptions for gastroesophageal reflux in a tertiary care setting through active implementation of national guideline recommendations and to evaluate intervention effect.

METHODS

Implementation consisted of 2 steps. First, all pediatric clinicians in an academic hospital received information on appropriate acid-suppressant prescribing, a link to an online national guideline application and summary card with important evidence-based recommendations-Wise Choices. Hereafter, clinicians prescribing acid suppressants were contacted to provide feedback on indications and to assess their knowledge of the guideline and Wise Choices. The pharmacy database supplied prescription data before, during, and after this intervention.

RESULTS

During the study period prescriptions ranged from 115 to 201/month. Ten months postintervention, a nonsignificant decrease of 4 prescriptions/month was measured (95% confidence interval -49-41). Of the 78 prescribers 76 were successfully contacted: 63% were familiar with the guideline and 45% with Wise Choices. Thirty percent of prescriptions were for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This multifaceted implementation strategy did not lead to a significant difference in acid-suppressant prescriptions by tertiary care clinicians of whom the majority was familiar with the gastroesophageal reflux disease guideline. Future studies should clarify, which implementation strategies are most effective in reducing inappropriate prescribing of acid suppressants for children. Uniform registration of prescriptions and indications in a national database will enable monitoring of the intervention effect.

We have had a gutful: The need for deprescribing proton pump inhibitors

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescribing may often be inappropriate and expose patients to a risk of adverse effects, while incurring unnecessary healthcare expenditure. Our objective was to determine PPI usage in Australia since 2002 and review international studies investigating inappropriate PPI prescribing, including those that discussed interventions to address this issue.

METHODS

Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (RPBS) data were analysed. A narrative literature review relevant to the objective was conducted. Time series analysis was also used to examine the trend of reported PPI appropriate use across the international studies included in this review.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Proton pump inhibitor use in Australia increased between 2002 and 2010 and then gradually decreased. Estimates of the extent of inappropriate use in the international literature had a wide variation (11-84%). There appeared to be little change in the extent of appropriate PPI use reported through 34 international studies from 2000 to 2016. Interventions to address inappropriate use included patient-centred deprescribing, academic detailing, educational programmes and drug safety notifications.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Proton pump inhibitors continue to be overused worldwide and should be a focus for deprescribing programmes. Ongoing education and awareness campaigns for health professionals and patients, including electronic reminders at the point of prescribing, are strategies that have potential to reduce PPI use in individuals who do not have an evidence-based clinical indication for their long-term use.

Outcome after Discontinuation of Proton Pump Inhibitors at a Residential Care Site: Quality Improvement Project

BACKGROUND

Increased prescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the past few decades can be attributed mainly to long-term use of this type of therapy. Recent evidence indicates signals of harm associated with long-term use of PPIs, such as increased risk of Clostridium difficile infection, recurrence of C. difficile infection, and fracture. A few studies have assessed the effectiveness of step-down management of patients receiving long-term PPI therapy in ambulatory care settings. However, it is unknown whether PPIs can be discontinued in older people without return of gastrointestinal symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the proportion of residents receiving long-term PPI therapy who were able to discontinue the drug without experiencing gastrointestinal symptoms warranting recommencement of the PPI or initiation of a histamine-2 receptor antagonist.

METHODS

The records of residents who had been taking a PPI for longer than 6 months at a single residential care site were audited by one pharmacist to determine the PPI indication. For residents who fit the criteria for discontinuation (no indication for long-term PPI therapy, not currently experiencing gastrointestinal symptoms, no previous trial of PPI discontinuation without success, and no anxiety when medications are discontinued), the pharmacist faxed a recommendation to discontinue PPI therapy without tapering to the physicians' offices. For cases in which the recommendation was accepted, 3 pharmacists followed the residents weekly for 8 weeks to assess whether gastrointestinal symptoms returned.

RESULTS

The pharmacist identified 28 residents who fit the criteria, and the recommendation to discontinue therapy was accepted for 27. At 8 weeks after the intervention, 19 (70%) of these residents were still asymptomatic and did not require re-initiation of medications to manage their gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support discontinuation of long-term PPI therapy for older people who fit the criteria for discontinuation. The study provided limited evidence to support the use of tapering. However, tapering can be used to identify the lowest effective dose and may increase patient comfort with deprescribing. Further research is needed to determine the effects of and best approaches to PPI discontinuation in older populations.

Review of Proton Pump Inhibitor Overuse in the US Veteran Population

Objective: A growing body of evidence provides proof that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are overused in the general population and that such use is associated with adverse risks and unnecessary costs. Our objective was to systematically evaluate PPI overuse in the veteran population. Data Sources: A literature search using MEDLINE and CINHAL databases (1946-December 2014) was performed using the search term proton pump inhibitors coupled with each of the following key words: inappropriate use, misuse, and overuse. Searches were limited to studies and reviews in English language and human subjects. Additional references were identified from a review of literature citations. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All articles that centrally addressed the issue of PPI overuse were evaluated, following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Data were extracted into Microsoft Excel 2013. Articles that focused on the pediatric or non-US veteran populations were excluded. Data Synthesis: Among 30 articles included, 5 evaluated PPI overuse in veterans. The reported prevalence rate of PPI overuse in veterans ranged from 33% to 67%. Several cases reported PPI-associated Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and pneumonia. One Veterans Affairs center reported the total cost of PPI overuse to be more than $200 000 based on over-the-counter costs and more than $1.5 million based on average wholesale price cost. Conclusions: PPI overuse is common among veterans and exposes them to adverse risks and costs the system enormous dollars. Based on the findings of this review, we provide recommendations to curb PPI overuse among veterans and in the Veterans Affairs system.

Impact of a clinical pharmacist stress ulcer prophylaxis management program on inappropriate use in hospitalized patients

PURPOSE

Appropriate utilization of stress ulcer prophylaxis should be limited to high-risk, intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, inappropriate stress ulcer prophylaxis use among all hospitalized patients remains a concern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of a novel pharmacist-managed stress ulcer prophylaxis program in ICU and general ward patients.

METHODS

This retrospective, pre- and poststudy design was conducted in adult ICU and general ward patients at a large academic medical center between January 1, 2011 and January 31, 2012 to compare the rates of inappropriate stress ulcer prophylaxis before and after the implementation of a pharmacist-led stress ulcer prophylaxis management program.

RESULTS

A total of 1134 unique patients consisting of 16,415 patient days were evaluated. The relative reduction in the rate of inappropriate stress ulcer prophylaxis days after program implementation in ICU and general ward patients was 58.3% and 83.5%, respectively (P < .001). The rates of ICU patients inappropriately continued on stress ulcer prophylaxis upon hospital discharge in the pre- and postimplementation groups were 29.9% and 3.6%, respectively (P < .001), whereas general ward patients significantly decreased from 36.2% to 5.4% in the pre- and postimplementation groups, respectively (P < .001). Total inpatient costs associated with all stress ulcer prophylaxis administered was $20,052.70 in the pre- and $3280.49 in the postimplementation group (P < .001), resulting in an estimated cost savings of > $200,000 annually. No differences in clinical outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a pharmacist-managed stress ulcer prophylaxis program was associated with a decrease in inappropriate acid suppression rates during hospitalization and upon discharge, as well as significant cost savings.

Proton pump inhibitor prescriptions and subsequent use in US veterans diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Empiric proton pump inhibitor use is common for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but initial proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescription patterns in Veterans are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims were to determine initial PPI prescriptions in Veterans diagnosed with GERD, and to characterize subsequent PPI use over the 2 years following initial prescription.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective study using Veteran's Administration (VA) administrative data and chart review.

STUDY POPULATION

Patients diagnosed with GERD and provided an initial PPI prescription at Hines VA Hospital from 2003 to 2007, with 2 year follow-up for each patient (through 2009). MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Initial PPI prescriptions were categorized as standard total daily dose or high total daily dose, and accuracy was confirmed by manual chart review. Descriptive statistics were calculated and bivariate analyses were used to assess for differences in demographics, prescriptions, and subsequent use by initial PPI dosage category.

RESULTS

Of the 1,621 patients included in the study, 378 (23.3 %) had high total daily dose initial PPI prescriptions and 1,243 (76.7 %) patients had standard total daily dose initial prescriptions. The majority of patients (65.8 %) received a 90-day or greater initial prescription. Over the 2 years following the initial PPI prescription, 13.0 % of patients with initial standard daily dose prescriptions had evidence of step-up therapy. Only 7.1 % of patients with initial high daily dose PPI prescriptions had evidence of step-down therapy. A large majority of patients (83.8 %) had at least one refill over 2 years, and the overall medication possession ratio was 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

Many Veterans receive high total daily dose PPI prescriptions as initial therapy for a GERD diagnosis, and few patients have evidence for cessation or reduction of therapy. These results provide detailed data on prescribing and use of PPIs to help guide efforts for optimal PPI use in US Veterans.

An automated tool for detecting medication overuse based on the electronic health records

PURPOSE

Medication overuse is a serious concern in healthcare as it leads to increased expenditures, side effects, and morbidities. Identifying overuse is only possible through excluding appropriate indications that are primarily mentioned in unstructured notes. We developed a framework for automatic identification of medication overuse and applied it to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS

We first created an indications knowledge base using data from drug labels, clinical guidelines, expert opinion, and other sources. We also obtained the list of current problems for 200 randomly selected inpatients who received PPIs using a natural language processing system and the discharge summaries of those patients. These problems were checked against the indications knowledge base to identify overuse candidates. Two gastroenterologists manually reviewed the notes and identified cases of overuse. Results from the automated framework were compared with the manual review.

RESULTS

Reviewers had high interrater reliability in finding indications (agreement = 92.1%, Cohen's κ = 0.773). In 137 notes included in the final analysis, our system identified indications with a sensitivity of 74% (95%CI = 59-86) and specificity of 95% (95%CI = 87-98). In cases of appropriate use where the automated system also found one or more indications, it always included the correct indication.

CONCLUSIONS

We created an automated system that can identify established indications of medication use in electronic health records with high accuracy. It can provide clinical decision support for identifying potential overuse of PPIs and could be useful for reducing overuse and encouraging better documentation of indications.

Clinical usefulness of adherence to gastro-esophageal reflux disease guideline by Spanish gastroenterologists

AIM: To investigate usefulness of adherence to gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) guideline established by the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology.

METHODS: Prospective, observational and multicentre study of 301 patients with typical symptoms of GERD who should be managed in accordance with guidelines and were attended by gastroenterologists in daily practice. Patients (aged > 18 years) were eligible for inclusion if they had typical symptoms of GERD (heartburn and/or acid regurgitation) as the major complaint in the presence or absence of accompanying atypical symptoms, such as dyspeptic symptoms and/or supraesophageal symptoms. Diagnostic and therapeutic decisions should be made based on specific recommendations of the Spanish clinical practice guideline for GERD which is a widely disseminated and well known instrument among Spanish in digestive disease specialists.

RESULTS: Endoscopy was indicated in 123 (41%) patients: 50 with alarm symptoms, 32 with age > 50 years without alarm symptom. Seventy-two patients (58.5%) had esophagitis (grade A, 23, grade B, 28, grade C, 18, grade D, 3). In the presence of alarm symptoms, endoscopy was indicated consistently with recommendations in 98% of cases. However, in the absence of alarm symptoms, endoscopy was indicated in 33% of patients > 50 years (not recommended by the guideline). Adherence for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) therapy was 80%, but doses prescribed were lower (half) in 5% of cases and higher (double) in 15%. Adherence regarding duration of PPI therapy was 69%; duration was shorter than recommended in 1% (4 wk in esophagitis grades C-D) or longer in 30% (8 wk in esophagitis grades A-B or in patients without endoscopy). Treatment response was higher when PPI doses were consistent with guidelines, although differences were not significant (95% vs 85%).

CONCLUSION: GERD guideline compliance was quite good although endoscopy was over indicated in patients > 50 years without alarm symptoms; PPIs were prescribed at higher doses and longer duration.

Rebound acid hypersecretion after withdrawal of gastric acid suppressing drugs: new evidence of similitude

BACKGROUND

Homeopathy is based on the principle of similitude (similia similibus curentur) using medicines that cause effects similar to the symptoms of disease in order to stimulate the reaction of the organism. Such vital, homeostatic or paradoxical reaction of the organism is closely related to rebound effect of drugs.

METHOD

Review of the literature concerning the rebound effects of drugs used to suppress gastric acidity, particularly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

RESULTS

The mechanism of action of these effects is discussed. Rebound in terms of clinical symptoms and physiological effects occur in about 40% of people taking PPIs, their timing depends on the half-life of the drug and the adaptation period of the physiological mechanisms involved. The wide use of PPIs may be linked to the rising incidence of carcinoid tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support Hahnemann's concept of secondary action of drugs. We are developing a homeopathic materia medica and repertory of modern drugs on the basis of reported rebound effects.

Prevalence and appropriateness of drug prescriptions for peptic ulcer and gastro-esophageal reflux disease in a cohort of hospitalized elderly

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are among the most commonly prescribed medicines and their overuse is widespread in both primary and secondary care. Inappropriate prescription is of particular concern among elderly patients, who have often multiple comorbidities and need many drugs.

METHODS

We evaluate the appropriateness of drugs for peptic ulcer or gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in a sample of elderly patients (65 years old or older) at admission and discharge in 38 internal medicine wards between January 2008 and December 2008, according to the presence of specific conditions or gastro-toxic drug combinations.

RESULTS

Among 1155 patients eligible for the analysis, 466 (40.3%) were treated with drugs for GERD or peptic ulcer were at hospital admission and 647 (56.0%) at discharge; 62.4% of patients receiving a drug for peptic ulcer or GERD at admission and 63.2% at discharge were inappropriately treated. Among these, the number of other drugs prescribed was associated with greater use of drugs for peptic ulcer or GERD, even after adjustment for age, sex and number of diagnoses at admission (OR 95% CI=1.26 (1.18-1.34), p=.0001) or discharge (OR 95% CI=1.11 (1.05-1.18), p=0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of inappropriate prescription of drugs for peptic ulcer or GERD remained almost the same at admission and discharge. Inappropriate use of these drugs is related to the concomitant use of other drugs. Careful assessment of clinical conditions and stricter adherence to evidence-based guidelines are essential for a rational and cost-effective use of drugs for peptic ulcer or GERD.

Dyspeptic symptom development after discontinuation of a proton pump inhibitor: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Conflicting data exist on whether discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is associated with rebound secretion of gastric acid.

METHODS

A total of 48 healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative volunteers (24 females) were randomized in a double-blinded manner to treatment with either pantoprazole 40 mg or placebo once daily for 28 days. Dyspeptic symptoms were registered daily using the Glasgow dyspepsia score (GDS) 2 weeks before, during, and 6 weeks after treatment. Plasma levels of gastrin and serum levels of chromogranin-A levels were measured before, during, and after treatment.

RESULTS

During the 2 weeks before treatment, the placebo group had a mean GDS of 0.20 + or - 0.7 compared with the pantoprazole group score of 0.54 + or - 1.3 (NS). No significant differences between the symptom severity scores of the two groups were shown during the treatment period. During the first week after discontinuation of treatment, the pantoprazole group had a mean symptom score of 5.7 + or - 11.7 vs. 0.74 + or - 2.6 in the placebo group (P<0.01). A total of 11 out of 25 (44%) subjects in the pantoprazole group developed dyspepsia compared with 2 out of 23 (9%) in the placebo group (P<0.01). During the second week of follow-up, the pantoprazole group had a mean symptom score of 1.6 + or - 3.4 compared with 0 + or - 0 in the placebo group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the mean symptom score for the pantoprazole group (1.1 + or - 0.6) compared with the placebo group (0.4 + or - 0.3) during the third week of follow-up. Symptom scores during the first week after treatment correlated with basal (P<0.01) and meal-stimulated (P<0.01) gastrin levels at the end of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A 4-week course of pantoprazole seems to induce dyspeptic symptoms in previously asymptomatic healthy H. pylori-negative subjects. The correlation between symptom score and gastrin levels suggests that these symptoms are due to acid rebound hypersecretion and seem to be related to the degree of acid inhibition.

Initiatives to enhance the quality and efficiency of statin and PPI prescribing in the UK: impact and implications

AIM

To assess the impact of a range of national and regional initiatives introduced in the North Lancashire Teaching Primary Care Trust (NLTPCT) since 2004 to enhance the quality and efficiency of prescribing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), statins and ezetimibe. In addition, to suggest additional measures that could be introduced in NLTPCT to further enhance the quality and efficiency of prescribing based on initiatives in other European countries.

METHOD

A before-and-after observational study was undertaken on the utilization and expenditure of prescriptions dispensed in ambulatory care in NLTPCT from 2004 to 2007. Utilization was assessed using 'defined daily doses' (DDDs) and 'DDDs/1000 inhabitants per day' and compared over the study period. Reimbursed expenditure was assessed in terms of overall expenditure, expenditure/DDD, as well as expenditure/1000 inhabitants per year.

RESULTS

The combination of measures and initiatives enhanced the utilization of generic PPIs. International Nonproprietary Name (INN) prescribing of omeprazole reached 98% of all omeprazole by 2007. The measures also resulted in limited utilization of esomeprazole and lowered reimbursed expenditure/DDD of generic omeprazole to GB pound0.13 by 2007. This was 87% below 2004 originator prices, leading to a 41% fall in PPI expenditure during the study period despite increased utilization. Utilization of statins grew by over 130% during the study period enhanced by increased utilization of high doses of simvastatin and atorvastatin following the introduction of the quality and outcomes framework. Simvastatin dominated statin utilization by 2007, with generic simvastatin accounting for over 99.5% of total simvastatin. Reimbursed expenditure/DDD for generic simvastatin was pound0.03 in 2007, 95% below 2004 originator prices, leading to a fall in overall expenditure on statins. It proved difficult to undertake an impact analysis as, typically, a range of measures were introduced sequentially and simultaneously during the study period.

CONCLUSION

The findings are in line with expectations and do provide examples to other European countries. This includes a high rate of INN prescribing, low reimbursed prices for generic simvastatin and omeprazole and growing utilization of higher strength statins. The high rate of INN prescribing reduces the need for additional measures that have been instigated in other European countries to further enhance the prescribing and dispensing of generics to fully realize the resource benefits. Additional demand side measures are feasible and have already been instigated to conserve resources.

Patterns and predictors of proton pump inhibitor overuse among academic and non-academic hospitalists

OBJECTIVE

In the hospital setting, several studies have reported proton pump inhibitor (PPI) overuse, a majority of which is continued after discharge. In addition to being expensive, PPIs are associated with an increased risk of infections, osteoporosis and serious drug interactions. We examined the trends and predictors of PPI guidelines non-compliance among academic and non-academic hospitalists in USA.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Oral PPI prescriptions initiated by 2 academic and 2 non-academic hospitalist groups were reviewed. Prescription indications were recorded when explicitly stated in the chart. Otherwise, qualified physicians reviewed the chart to make such determination. Indications were then compared to the published guidelines. Several variables were tested to determine independent predictors of initiation and post discharge continuation of guideline non-compliant prescriptions.

RESULTS

Of the 400 PPI prescriptions 39% were guideline compliant. Academic hospitalists were significantly more compliant with PPI prescription guidelines (50 vs 29%). Gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding prophylaxis (GIP) for low risk patients was the most common indication for non-compliant prescriptions, while that of guideline compliant prescriptions was dyspepsia treatment. Independent predictors of the initiation of guideline non-compliant prescriptions were non-academic hospitalist group, PPI indication not documented in the chart, and GIP as part of the admission orderset. The latter was an independent predictor of those prescriptions continuation post-discharge (protective) in addition to non-academic hospitalists group.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalists overprescribe PPI to a level comparable to that of the non-hospitalist providers in the literature. Understanding the determinants of increased compliance among academic groups is instrumental to design interventions aimed at increasing PPI prescription compliance.

Therapeutic intent of proton pump inhibitor prescription among elderly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users

BACKGROUND

Prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased dramatically.

AIM

To assess therapeutic intent of PPI prescription among elderly veterans prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

METHODS

Medical-record abstraction identified therapeutic intent of PPI prescription. An 'appropriate therapeutic intent' was defined as symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or endoscopic oesophagitis, Zollinger-Ellison disease, dyspepsia, upper gastrointestinal event, Helicobacter pylori infection or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastroprotection. Logistic regression predicted the outcome while adjusting for clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 1491 patients [mean 73 years (s.d. 5.6), 73% white and 99.8% men], among those charts which did document a therapeutic indication, 88.8% were appropriate. Prior gastroscopy was predictive of an appropriate therapeutic intent (OR 2.7; 95% CI: 1.9-3.7). Prescription to patients who used VA pharmacy services only, to in-patients, or by a cardiologist or an otolaryngologist were less likely to be appropriate. Gastroprotection was poorly recognized as an indication for PPI prescription, except by rheumatologists (OR 46.7; 95% CI: 15.9-136.9), or among highly co-morbid patients (OR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-2.9). Among in-patients, 45% of PPI prescriptions were initiated for unknown or inappropriate reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

Type of provider predicts appropriate PPI use. In-patient prescription is associated with poor recognition of necessary gastroprotection and unknown therapeutic intent.

Evaluation of use of proton pump inhibitors in Greece

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for acid-related gastric diseases. However, several national studies reported increasing use of PPIs for yet unlicensed indications.

AIM

The aim of our study was to evaluate the extent of PPIs prescription in a Greek tertiary hospital, as well as the adherence to licensed indications according to the Greek National Drug Organization.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the discharge letters of 1693 adult patients who were admitted at the First Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine at AHEPA hospital in Thessaloniki, Greece between July 2005 and December 2006. We studied their discharge letters in order to record all cases in which antisecretory therapy (PPIs or H(2) antagonists) was prescribed, as well as to collect data about indication of PPI treatment and the type of PPI prescribed for each patient.

RESULTS

PPIs were prescribed in 430 patients (25.4%). In 349 patients, PPIs were prescribed for an improper indication (81.2%), mainly for prophylaxis against medications such as steroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelets and warfarin. The most commonly prescribed PPI was omeprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

PPIs are inappropriately prescribed in Greece. In most cases, physicians prescribe PPIs for unlicensed indications and usually, they do not give specific instructions about the duration of the treatment.

Use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of osteoporosis-related fractures

BACKGROUND

The use of proton pump inhibitors has been associated with an increased risk of hip fracture. We sought to further explore the relation between duration of exposure to proton pump inhibitors and osteoporosis-related fractures.

METHODS

We used administrative claims data to identify patients with a fracture of the hip, vertebra or wrist between April 1996 and March 2004. Cases were each matched with 3 controls based on age, sex and comorbidities. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the risk of hip fracture and all osteoporosis-related fractures for durations of proton pump inhibitor exposure ranging from 1 or more years to more than 7 years.

RESULTS

We matched 15 792 cases of osteoporosis-related fractures with 47 289 controls. We did not detect a significant association between the overall risk of an osteoportic fracture and the use of proton pump inhibitors for durations of 6 years or less. However, exposure of 7 or more years was associated with increased risk of an osteoporosis-related fracture (adjusted OR 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-3.18, p = 0.011). We also found an increased risk of hip fracture after 5 or more years of exposure (adjusted OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.02-2.58, p = 0.04), with even higher risk after 7 or more years exposure (adjusted OR 4.55, 95% CI 1.68-12.29, p = 0.002).

INTERPRETATION

Use of proton pump inhibitors for 7 or more years is associated with a significantly increased risk of an osteoporosis-related fracture. There is an increased risk of hip fracture after 5 or more years exposure. Further study is required to determine the clinical importance of this finding and to determine the value of osteoprotective medications for patients with long-term use of proton pump inhibitors.

Proton pump inhibitors and hospital discharge rates for gastrointestinal events in Italy: a national ecological study

BACKGROUND

Several meta-analyses have supported the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) both in the treatment of peptic ulcers and in the prevention of ulceration, perforation, and hemorrhage from the upper gastrointestinal tract. PPIs have been associated with reducing the risk for recurrent ulcer bleeding and ulcer-related surgery, but they have not been associated with reduced mortality rate.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current analysis was to conduct a national ecological study exploring the relationship between the consumption of PPIs and hospital discharge rates for gastrointestinal events. We also analyzed the potential savings for the Italian National Health Service (INHS) obtained by a reduction in hospitalizations for gastrointestinal events.

METHODS

Data provided by the Italian Ministry of Health allowed us to calculate the annual number of hospital discharge rates from 2000 to 2003 for gastrointestinal events and the national expenditure and consumption rates (expressed as defined daily doses [DDDs] per 1000 population per day) for histamine-2-receptor antagonists, prostaglandins, PPIs, and for other drugs prescribed for peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

RESULTS

The results of this study suggest that there was a statistically significant relationship between the rate of hospital discharge for gastrointestinal events and PPI consumption r = -0.99; P = 0.003). An estimated mean increase of 180.8% in the number of DDDs for PPIs was found among all Italian regions. This drug's consumption increase was associated with an increase of 61.1% in the drug expenditure for treatment of peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux diseases. At the same time, there was a 23.3% reduction in hospital discharge rates for gastrointestinal events and a reduction of 24.5% in the expenditure sustained by INHS for reimbursement of diagnosis-related group tariffs. In Italy there was an absolute increase of 353 Euro million in the expenditure for gastroprotective drugs and a reduction of 39.6 million Euro in the expenditure for reimbursements due to hospitalization for gastrointestinal events.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this study in the Italian population, an increase of PPI consumption was observed to coincide with a reduction of hospital admissions for gastrointestinal events. Although this was not a cost-effectiveness analysis, and some relevant societal costs were not considered, this study found that for each 1000 Euro spent for gastroprotective drugs a reduction of 112 Euro was observed in the expenditure for hospital admissions due to gastrointestinal events. This finding also suggests that there is room for improvement in the utilization of PPIs for public health protection in Italy.

Inappropriate prescribing of proton pump inhibitors in primary care

OBJECTIVES

To determine if an educational intervention initiated in secondary care can influence prescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the community.

METHODS

A prospective study of PPI use in patients admitted to medical wards in a university hospital. A simple educational intervention was employed to reduce inappropriate prescribing of PPIs in the community.

RESULTS

In the pre-intervention analysis 66/271 (24%) patients were receiving treatment with a PPI prescribed in the community. In 36/66 (54%) patients the PPI had been prescribed inappropriately. Six months after the intervention 91/344 (26%) patients were prescribed a PPI in the community. In only 45 of these 91 (49%) patients was there a recommended indication.

CONCLUSION

The intervention used in this study had no effect on the proportion of patients taking a PPI at the time of hospital admission or on the appropriateness of prescribing in the community.

Management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease in primary care. Results from an observational study of 2 474 patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to describe the management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) by primary care physicians (PCPs).

METHODS

This prospective survey was conducted in patients with suspected or previously diagnosed GERD. PCPs completed questionnaires at first consultation (M0) and at a 3-month follow-up visit (M3).

RESULTS

2 474 patients were available for analysis at M0 and 1 993 at M3. GERD was the reason for consultation in 84% of patients; 33% were consulting about reflux symptoms for the first time. Symptoms occurred once daily in 55% of patients and were considered very disruptive or incapacitating by 51%. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed at any time in 57% of patients and at M0 in 20%. Only 48% of demands for endoscopy agreed with current recommendations and this rate was not influenced by PCP training in the previous 6 months. Lifestyle measures were recommended in 95% of patients at M0. Proton pump inhibitors were prescribed in 98%, to be taken "on-demand" in 22-57% depending on symptom frequency. Therapeutic management was considered as very satisfactory by 81% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

GERD managed in primary care is severe, leading to expensive, but effective diagnostic investigations and treatments. Agreement with recommendations for endoscopy is poor.

Continuation of proton pump inhibitors from hospital to community

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the appropriateness of initiation of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment in hospital, the quality of discharge information, and any association with continued treatment in the community.

METHOD

Survey of all inpatients newly initiated on a PPI in June-August 2003. Assessment of appropriateness of therapy and completeness of discharge information; assessment of continuation of PPI therapy in the community after 6 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-five of 58 patients (60%) were considered appropriately commenced on PPI treatment. Less than 25% of patients discharged on a PPI had discharge information recommending duration of treatment or review. In the "appropriate" group 30 patients (86%) were discharged on omeprazole, and 13/21 (62%) evaluable patients remained on this at 6 months. In the "inappropriate" group 15 (65%) were discharged on omeprazole, and 10/14 (71%) evaluable patients remained on this at 6 months. Older patients remained on omeprazole for a longer duration but appropriateness of commencement did not influence the duration of treatment. Dose titration was attempted for 10 (29%) patients including three from the "inappropriate" group.

CONCLUSION

Care should be taken to commence PPIs only when clinically indicated. Discharge information to GPs, especially recommendations for duration of treatment and/or dose titration, requires improvement.

Discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors in patients on long-term therapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The proportion of proton pump inhibitor users on long-term therapy who can discontinue proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication without developing symptoms is unknown.

AIM

To determine the proportion of patients on long-term PPI therapy who are able to discontinue PPIs without developing symptoms.

METHODS

Patients on long-term PPIs, without a history of peptic ulcer or esophagitis underwent upper endoscopy. Patients were randomized double-blindly to taper down or continue a constant dosage of omeprazole for three weeks. Thereafter, all patients discontinued PPIs.

RESULTS

Of the 97 patients enrolled, had used PPIs for 48 months, 78% had GERD. A total of 27% did not use PPIs during the year after discontinuation, 31% of the patients randomized to tapering discontinued PPIs and 22% of those who did not could discontinue therapy (NS). Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients were more prone to continue PPIs than non-GERD patients. Only 16 (21%) of GERD patients were off PPIs vs. 48% of patients without GERD (p < 0.05). Serum gastrin was higher at baseline in GERD patients who resumed PPIs versus non-resumers (p < 0.05). GERD and serum gastrin were independent predictors of PPI requirement.

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of PPI was successful in 27% of long-term PPI users. GERD patients had more difficulty discontinuing PPIs than non-GERD patients.

Accounting for the increase in NSAID expenditure: substitution or leakage?

BACKGROUND

National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance stated that a new form of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (selective COX-2 inhibitors) should only be an option for arthritis patients at high risk of a gastro-intestinal (GI) event. Total expenditure on NSAIDs has risen by 57% over five years, to 247 pounds sterling million in 2004. We assess whether this expenditure increase can be accounted for by substitution--an increased prescribing of two (more expensive) selective COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib and rofecoxib) and a simultaneous equivalent reduction in the prescribing volume of three (cheaper) older NSAIDs (diclofenac, ibuprofen and naproxen).

METHODS

Quarterly prescription data was collated from January 1999 to September 2004. Over this period, the level of correlation between the total prescribing volumes for i) celecoxib and rofecoxib, and ii) diclofenac, ibuprofen, and naproxen were compared, the change in total expenditure on the five NSAIDs was also estimated. The latter was apportioned into that which was estimated to have arisen due to i) substitution, and ii) increased NSAID prescription volume.

RESULTS

Total prescription volumes for the two NSAID groups were negatively correlated (r = -0.97, p < 0.001). In the last quarter there were 1.23 million prescriptions for celecoxib and rofecoxib, and 0.46 million fewer prescriptions for naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen (than in the first quarter, when celecoxib and rofecoxib were not prescribed). Total expenditure for the five NSAIDs was 32.7 pounds sterling million higher in the last quarter, than the first, 12.2 pounds sterling million of which was estimated to be due to substitution, and 20.4 pounds sterling million due to increased volume.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of celecoxib and rofecoxib was associated with a reduction in the prescription volume for naproxen, diclofenac, and ibuprofen. However, overall quarterly prescription volume for these five NSAIDs increased by 0.76 million, and we estimate that quarterly expenditure increased by 20.4 pounds sterling million more than would have been expected if overall NSAID volume had remained constant. This suggests that the prescription of both celecoxib and rofecoxib may have 'leaked' to population groups who would not previously have received an older NSAID.

Proton pump inhibitors: a survey of prescribing in an Irish general hospital

Prescription rates and attendant costs of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) continue to rise. The aim of this study was to assess the extent and appropriateness of PPI prescribing in an Irish general hospital. Using a structured pro forma, we conducted a 1-day comprehensive survey of the prescription charts of all inpatients. Of the 157 inpatients, 48 (30.6%) were on PPI therapy and omeprazole was the most widely prescribed PPI. Rabeprazole, the least expensive PPI, was the least prescribed. Prescription of PPI therapy was for an approved indication in 32 patients (66.6%) but was for an unapproved or unknown indication in 16 (33.3%). Prescribing had been initiated in hospital in 34 patients (70.8%) but only one-third of the patients on PPI therapy had undergone endoscopy. Over 90% of patients were on additional, often multiple, prescribed medications. Our results suggest that PPIs are overprescribed in hospital practice, and there is scope to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of PPI prescribing.

Appropriateness of gastric antisecretory therapy in hospital practice

BACKGROUND

Recent data indicate an exponential increase in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescribing, and concerns are raised regarding the appropriateness of these prescriptions and the financial implications.

AIM

To survey the appropriateness of PPI prescription in a cohort of patients in a tertiary referral hospital.

METHODS

Prescription records of all inpatients on a randomly selected day were reviewed. The appropriateness of prescription and relevant investigations were identified by interview of patients, review of patient records and of a computerised endoscopy records system.

RESULTS

Thirty-two per cent (87 of 272) of all patients were on PPIs. A valid indication for therapy was not apparent in 63% of the patients on PPIs with the only predictive factor for inappropriate prescription being increasing age. Only 36 of the 87 patients on PPIs had undergone appropriate investigations for their gastrointestinal symptoms. Gender, age, speciality of admission or duration of hospital stay did not influence the appropriateness of prescription or performance of relevant investigations.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be a widespread and inappropriate use of PPIs in hospital practice.

Pharmacy data in the VA health care system

Recent advances in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care data systems have greatly increased access to operational pharmacy information. This article presents a brief guide to VA pharmacy data sources: the Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture files, the Pharmacy Benefits Management database, Decision Support System (DSS) National Data Extracts for inpatient and outpatient care, the planned DSS National Pharmacy Extract, DSS databases at local VA facilities, and the Non-VA Fee Basis files. Depending on the source, available data elements include patient demographics, clinical care information, characteristics of the medication and of the prescribing physician, and cost. Access policies are detailed for VA and non-VA researchers. Linking these sources to VA databases containing data on inpatient and outpatient services offers a comprehensive view of health care within several VA populations of general interest, including people over age 65 and those with physical and psychiatric disabilities.

Overuse of acid suppressive therapy in hospitalised patients with pulmonary diseases

OBJECTIVES

Overuse of acid suppressive therapy (AST) has been reported in hospitalised patients, but the use in specific patient categories is unexplored. We assessed the use of and indication for AST and upper endoscopic investigations in hospitalised patients on a pulmonary ward compared with patients on other wards.

METHODS

301 patients were enrolled in the study. 162 were hospitalised on a pulmonary ward with a control group consisting of 139 from both a surgical and general internal medicine ward. Adequate indications for AST were those strongly supported by medical literature.

RESULTS

Among the 301 patients enrolled, 132 (44%) used AST. 78 (59%) had no adequate indication for AST. On the pulmonary ward 79 (49%) patients used AST, compared to only 10 (20%) on the internal medicine ward (P < 0.05). On the pulmonary ward 68% of the patients had no adequate indication for AST, which was more common than inappropriate use of ASTon the control wards (P < 0.05). The most common inadequate indication for AST was peptic ulcer prophylaxis during corticoidsteroid therapy.

CONCLUSION

In hospitalised patients a significant overuse of AST was observed, particularly among pulmonary patients. More adequate use of AST can contribute to substantial savings for the health-care system.

Overuse of proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

There have been concerns raised about the potential adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors, especially with long-term use. In particular, their potent action can suppress the features and delay the diagnosis of gastric cancer, while prolonged exposure may hasten the development of gastric carcinoids.

AIM

To examine the use of proton pump inhibitors in patients at the major teaching hospital in Tasmania, Australia, principally to determine the appropriateness of the therapy according to published guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the medical records of all patients prescribed any of the proton pump inhibitors at the hospital over a 7-month period, was performed. An extensive range of demographic and clinical variables was recorded for each patient. The patients were also asked a series of questions during their hospitalization to extract some of the relevant information - in particular, if and when they had undergone endoscopy.

RESULTS

The 200 patients (52% males) had a mean age of 69 +/- 16.4 years. The most common indications for using proton pump inhibitors were acute gastrointestinal bleeding (20.9%), severe refractory ulcerating oesophagitis (17.3%), mild/moderate oesophageal reflux (17.3%) and refractory peptic ulcer (11.7%). A large number of patients were using a proton pump inhibitor for 'other' indications (39.6%). The prescribing of proton pump inhibitors satisfied the approved indications, as outlined in the Australian Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits, in only 37.1% of cases. Endoscopy had been performed in 54.1% of patients prior to commencing therapy with a proton pump inhibitor and within the next 7 days in another 12.8% of patients. Only 59% of patients had previously been treated with an H2-receptor antagonist before commencing therapy with a proton pump inhibitor. Even worse, only 58.5% of patients had used an H2-receptor antagonist before a proton pump inhibitor for mild/moderate oesophagitis. The median duration of proton pump inhibitor therapy for patients admitted to the hospital and already receiving one of the drugs was 450 days. Over half of the patients were being concurrently treated with other drugs which are known to cause or exacerbate gastro-oesophageal disease, and 18% were smokers.

CONCLUSION

Whereas the proton pump inhibitors are undoubtedly effective agents, studies of their prescribing in practice consistently suggest over-use prior to endoscopy, use in patients who do not fit the approved criteria, and prescribing for indications in which 'less powerful' agents should have been sufficiently effective for the patient's symptoms. This poses economic and safety concerns, particularly in light of the suggestion that these drugs could delay the diagnosis of gastric cancer.