1
|
Yakushiji K, Fujita K, Tabuchi Y, Matsunaga-Myoji Y, Tanaka S, Mawatari M. Long-term health-related quality of life of total hip arthroplasty patients and cost-effectiveness analysis in the Japanese universal health insurance system. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2023; 20:e12537. [PMID: 37088471 DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
AIM Total hip arthroplasty can effectively improve patients' motility with end-stage osteoarthritis. This study aimed to: (1) compare gradual changes in utility values with total hip arthroplasty and estimated values without; (2) evaluate total hip arthroplasty cost-effectiveness; and (3) evaluate cost-effectiveness by age, diagnosis, and comorbidity. METHODS Patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty between January 2008 and December 2009 were included. Patients completed the EuroQol preoperatively and at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years postoperatively. To derive the quality-adjusted life years gained, a utility score was obtained from the EuroQol item scores and combined with 7 years, and estimates were obtained by discounting the postoperative 1-year utility value at an annual rate of 2%-4%. Mixed-effects regression models were used to compare the estimated and the measured utility values. RESULTS Mean total cost was 1,921,849 yen, and quality-adjusted life years gain score was 1.746 with per cost as 1,100,715 yen. Compared with actual measurements, the estimated values from 1 to 7 years post-surgery differed significantly, and interaction was observed. Regarding age, the older the patient, the higher the cost per quality-adjusted life years. Patients with lower preoperative physical function had higher quality-adjusted life years gains, while the cost per quality-adjusted life years was lower. CONCLUSIONS Total hip arthroplasty was cost-effective. Compared with actual measurements, the estimated utility values from 1 to 7 years post-surgery significantly differed. Even among older patients and those with impaired preoperative physical functions, its cost was lower than patients' willingness to pay in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanako Yakushiji
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kimie Fujita
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Yuriko Matsunaga-Myoji
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Satomi Tanaka
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vo NX, Che UTT, Ngo TTT, Bui TT. Economic Evaluation of Glucosamine in Knee Osteoarthritis Treatments in Vietnam. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2502. [PMID: 37761699 PMCID: PMC10531128 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the degeneration of cartilage in joints that results in bones rubbing against each other; it causes uncomfortable symptoms such as pain, swelling, and stiffness and can lead to disability. It usually occurs in the elderly and causes a large medical burden. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness between the standard treatment for osteoarthritis and standard treatment with added crystalline glucosamine sulfate at various stages. Markov analysis modeling was applied to evaluate the effect of both adding glucosamine compared to standard treatment from a societal perspective during whole patients' lifetimes. Data input was collected from reviews in previous studies. The outcome was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) from a societal perspective was applied with 3% and discounted for all costs and outcomes. One-way analysis via the Tornado diagram was performed to investigate the change in factors in the model. In general, adding glucosamine into the standard treatment proved to be more cost-effective compared to the standard treatment. Particularly, the early-stage addition of glucosamine in the treatment was cost-effective compared to the post-stage addition of glucosamine. The addition of supplementing crystalline glucosamine sulfate to the whole regimen at any stage was cost-effective at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nam Xuan Vo
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (U.T.T.C.); (T.T.T.N.)
| | - Uyen Thi Thuc Che
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (U.T.T.C.); (T.T.T.N.)
| | - Thanh Thi Thanh Ngo
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (U.T.T.C.); (T.T.T.N.)
| | - Tien Thuy Bui
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Le Van Thinh Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vo NX, Le NNH, Chu TDP, Pham HL, Dinh KXA, Che UTT, Ngo TTT, Bui TT. Cost-Effectiveness of Glucosamine in Osteoarthritis Treatment: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2340. [PMID: 37628537 PMCID: PMC10454215 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11162340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition that most frequently affects older adults. It is currently the most common disability. The cost of treating an aging population places pressure on the healthcare budget. As a result, it is imperative to evaluate medicines' cost-effectiveness and, accordingly, their influence on health resource allocation. Our study aims to summarize the cost and outcome of utilizing glucosamine in OA treatment. Databases like Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched as part of the identification process up until April 2023. Our primary inclusion criteria centered on the economic evaluation of glucosamine in OA treatments, providing an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument was applied to grade the quality of the studies. Seven qualified studies that discussed the cost-effectiveness of glucosamine with or without other formulations were selected. All of them demonstrated that glucosamine was cost-effective. There was an increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) when incorporating glucosamine in conventional care. Moreover, patented crystalline glucosamine sulfate (pCGS) was more cost-effective than the other formulations of glucosamine (OFG). Overall, utilizing pCGS was more beneficial than using OFG in terms both of cost and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nam Xuan Vo
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (N.N.H.L.); (T.D.P.C.); (H.L.P.); (K.X.A.D.); (U.T.T.C.); (T.T.T.N.)
| | - Ngan Nguyen Hoang Le
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (N.N.H.L.); (T.D.P.C.); (H.L.P.); (K.X.A.D.); (U.T.T.C.); (T.T.T.N.)
| | - Trinh Dang Phuong Chu
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (N.N.H.L.); (T.D.P.C.); (H.L.P.); (K.X.A.D.); (U.T.T.C.); (T.T.T.N.)
| | - Huong Lai Pham
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (N.N.H.L.); (T.D.P.C.); (H.L.P.); (K.X.A.D.); (U.T.T.C.); (T.T.T.N.)
| | - Khang Xuan An Dinh
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (N.N.H.L.); (T.D.P.C.); (H.L.P.); (K.X.A.D.); (U.T.T.C.); (T.T.T.N.)
| | - Uyen Thi Thuc Che
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (N.N.H.L.); (T.D.P.C.); (H.L.P.); (K.X.A.D.); (U.T.T.C.); (T.T.T.N.)
| | - Thanh Thi Thanh Ngo
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam; (N.N.H.L.); (T.D.P.C.); (H.L.P.); (K.X.A.D.); (U.T.T.C.); (T.T.T.N.)
| | - Tien Thuy Bui
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Le Van Thinh Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kopec JA, Sayre EC, Okhmatovskaia A, Cibere J, Li LC, Bansback N, Wong H, Ghanbarian S, Esdaile JM. A comparison of three strategies to reduce the burden of osteoarthritis: A population-based microsimulation study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0261017. [PMID: 34879102 PMCID: PMC8654220 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare three strategies for reducing population health burden of osteoarthritis (OA): improved pharmacological treatment of OA-related pain, improved access to joint replacement surgery, and prevention of OA by reducing obesity and overweight. Methods We applied a validated computer microsimulation model of OA in Canada. The model simulated a Canadian-representative open population aged 20 years and older. Variables in the model included demographics, body mass index, OA diagnosis, OA treatment, mortality, and health-related quality of life. Model parameters were derived from analyses of national surveys, population-based administrative data, a hospital-based cohort study, and the literature. We compared 8 what-if intervention scenarios in terms of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) relative to base-case, over a wide range of time horizons. Results Reductions in DALYs depended on the type of intervention, magnitude of the intervention, and the time horizon. Medical interventions (a targeted increase in the use of painkillers) tended to produce effects quickly and were, therefore, most effective over a short time horizon (a decade). Surgical interventions (increased access to joint replacement) were most effective over a medium time horizon (two decades or longer). Preventive interventions required a substantial change in BMI to generate a significant impact, but produced more reduction in DALYs than treatment strategies over a very long time horizon (several decades). Conclusions In this population-based modeling study we assessed the potential impact of three different burden reduction strategies in OA. Data generated by our model may help inform the implementation of strategies to reduce the burden of OA in Canada and elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacek A. Kopec
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Eric C. Sayre
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Jolanda Cibere
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Linda C. Li
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nick Bansback
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hubert Wong
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Shahzad Ghanbarian
- Centre of Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - John M. Esdaile
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Crittenden TA, Ratcliffe J, Watson DI, Mpundu-Kaambwa C, Dean NR. Cost-utility analysis of breast reduction surgery for women with symptomatic breast hypertrophy. Med J Aust 2021; 216:147-152. [PMID: 34784653 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the cost-effectiveness of breast reduction surgery for women with symptomatic breast hypertrophy in Australia. DESIGN Cost-utility analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS Adult women with symptomatic breast hypertrophy assessed for bilateral breast reduction at the Flinders Medical Centre, a public tertiary hospital in Adelaide, April 2007 - February 2018. The control group included women with breast hypertrophy who had not undergone surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Health care costs (for the surgical admission and other related hospital costs within 12 months of surgery) and SF-6D utility scores (measure of health-related quality of life) were used to calculate incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained over 12 months, extrapolated to a 10-year time horizon. RESULTS Of 251 women who underwent breast reduction, 209 completed the baseline and at least one post-operation assessment (83%; intervention group); 124 of 350 invited women waiting for breast reduction surgery completed the baseline and 12-month assessments (35%; control group). In the intervention group, the mean SF-6D utility score increased from 0.313 (SD, 0.263) at baseline to 0.626 (SD, 0.277) at 12 months; in the control group, it declined from 0.296 (SD, 0.267) to 0.270 (SD, 0.257). The mean QALY gain was consequently greater for the intervention group (adjusted difference, 1.519; 95% CI, 1.362-1.675). The mean hospital cost per patient was $11 857 (SD, $4322), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the intervention was $7808 per QALY gained. The probability of breast reduction surgery being cost-effective was 100% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY and 88% at $28 033 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS Breast reduction surgery for women with symptomatic breast hypertrophy is cost-effective and should be available to women through the Australian public healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Nicola R Dean
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA.,Flinders University, Adelaide, SA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Agarwal N, To K, Khan W. Cost effectiveness analyses of total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis: A PRISMA systematic review. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e13806. [PMID: 33128841 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare services are facing economic constraints globally with an increasingly elderly population, and greater burdens of osteoarthritis. Because of the chronic nature of osteoarthritis and the costs associated with surgery, arthroplasty is seen as potentially cost saving. There have been no systematic reviews conducted on cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) studies of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the management of osteoarthritis. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate CEAs conducted on THA for osteoarthritis to determine if THA is a cost-effective intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was conducted using five databases to identify all clinical CEAs of THA for osteoarthritis conducted after 1 January 1997. Twenty-eight studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The Quality of Health Economic Analysis (QHES) checklist was employed to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS The average QHES score was 86 indicating high quality studies. All studies reviewed concluded that THA was a cost-effective intervention. In younger patients, cementless THA and ceramic on polyethylene implants were found to be most cost effective. Hybrid THA and metal on polyethylene implants had the greatest cost utility in older patients. In patients with acetabular defects, cemented cup with impaction bone grafting was most cost effective, while dual mobility THA was most cost effective in patients with high risk of dislocation. CONCLUSION We have shown that THA is a cost-effective treatment for hip osteoarthritis. These findings should be implemented into clinical practice to improve cost utility in health services across the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Agarwal
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences & Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kendrick To
- Division of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Wasim Khan
- Division of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wilson R, Chua J, Briggs AM, Abbott JH. The cost-effectiveness of recommended adjunctive interventions for knee osteoarthritis: Results from a computer simulation model. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2020; 2:100123. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
8
|
Cost-Effectiveness of Arthroplasty Management in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: a Quality Review of the Literature. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN RHEUMATOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40674-020-00157-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
9
|
Hay E, Dziedzic K, Foster N, Peat G, van der Windt D, Bartlam B, Blagojevic-Bucknall M, Edwards J, Healey E, Holden M, Hughes R, Jinks C, Jordan K, Jowett S, Lewis M, Mallen C, Morden A, Nicholls E, Ong BN, Porcheret M, Wulff J, Kigozi J, Oppong R, Paskins Z, Croft P. Optimal primary care management of clinical osteoarthritis and joint pain in older people: a mixed-methods programme of systematic reviews, observational and qualitative studies, and randomised controlled trials. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar06040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BackgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is the most common long-term condition managed in UK general practice. However, care is suboptimal despite evidence that primary care and community-based interventions can reduce OA pain and disability.ObjectivesThe overall aim was to improve primary care management of OA and the health of patients with OA. Four parallel linked workstreams aimed to (1) develop a health economic decision model for estimating the potential for cost-effective delivery of primary care OA interventions to improve population health, (2) develop and evaluate new health-care models for delivery of core treatments and support for self-management among primary care consulters with OA, and to investigate prioritisation and implementation of OA care among the public, patients, doctors, health-care professionals and NHS trusts, (3) determine the effectiveness of strategies to optimise specific components of core OA treatment using the example of exercise and (4) investigate the effect of interventions to tackle barriers to core OA treatment, using the example of comorbid anxiety and depression in persons with OA.Data sourcesThe North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project database, held by Keele University, was the source of data for secondary analyses in workstream 1.MethodsWorkstream 1 used meta-analysis and synthesis of published evidence about effectiveness of primary care treatments, combined with secondary analysis of existing longitudinal population-based cohort data, to identify predictors of poor long-term outcome (prognostic factors) and design a health economic decision model to estimate cost-effectiveness of different hypothetical strategies for implementing optimal primary care for patients with OA. Workstream 2 used mixed methods to (1) develop and test a ‘model OA consultation’ for primary care health-care professionals (qualitative interviews, consensus, training and evaluation) and (2) evaluate the combined effect of a computerised ‘pop-up’ guideline for general practitioners (GPs) in the consultation and implementing the model OA consultation on practice and patient outcomes (parallel group intervention study). Workstream 3 developed and investigated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) how to optimise the effect of exercise in persons with knee OA by tailoring it to the individual and improving adherence. Workstream 4 developed and investigated in a cluster RCT the extent to which screening patients for comorbid anxiety and depression can improve OA outcomes. Public and patient involvement included proposal development, project steering and analysis. An OA forum involved public, patient, health professional, social care and researcher representatives to debate the results and formulate proposals for wider implementation and dissemination.ResultsThis programme provides evidence (1) that economic modelling can be used in OA to extrapolate findings of cost-effectiveness beyond the short-term outcomes of clinical trials, (2) about ways of implementing support for self-management and models of optimal primary care informed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations, including the beneficial effects of training in a model OA consultation on GP behaviour and of pop-up screens in GP consultations on the quality of prescribing, (3) against adding enhanced interventions to current effective physiotherapy-led exercise for knee OA and (4) against screening for anxiety and depression in patients with musculoskeletal pain as an addition to current best practice for OA.ConclusionsImplementation of evidence-based care for patients with OA is feasible in general practice and has an immediate impact on improving the quality of care delivered to patients. However, improved levels of quality of care, changes to current best practice physiotherapy and successful introduction of psychological screening, as achieved by this programme, did not substantially reduce patients’ pain and disability. This poses important challenges for clinical practice and OA research.LimitationsThe key limitation in this work is the lack of improvement in patient-reported pain and disability despite clear evidence of enhanced delivery of evidence-based care.Future work recommendations(1) New thinking and research is needed into the achievable and desirable long-term goals of care for people with OA, (2) continuing investigation into the resources needed to properly implement clinical guidelines for management of OA as a long-term condition, such as regular monitoring to maintain exercise and physical activity and (3) new research to identify subgroups of patients with OA as a basis for stratified primary care including (i) those with good prognosis who can self-manage with minimal investigation or specialist treatment, (ii) those who will respond to, and benefit from, specific interventions in primary care, such as physiotherapy-led exercise, and (iii) develop research into effective identification and treatment of clinically important anxiety and depression in patients with OA and into the effects of pain management on psychological outcomes in patients with OA.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN06984617, ISRCTN93634563 and ISRCTN40721988.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research Programme; Vol. 6, No. 4. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Hay
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Krysia Dziedzic
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Nadine Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - George Peat
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Danielle van der Windt
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Bernadette Bartlam
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Milisa Blagojevic-Bucknall
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - John Edwards
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Emma Healey
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Melanie Holden
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Rhian Hughes
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Clare Jinks
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Kelvin Jordan
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Sue Jowett
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martyn Lewis
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Christian Mallen
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Andrew Morden
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Elaine Nicholls
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Bie Nio Ong
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Mark Porcheret
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jerome Wulff
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jesse Kigozi
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Raymond Oppong
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zoe Paskins
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Peter Croft
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Odum SM, Fehring TK. Can Original Knee Society Scores Be Used to Estimate New 2011 Knee Society Scores? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475:160-167. [PMID: 27178041 PMCID: PMC5174033 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4886-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Knee Society Score (KSS) instrument is one of the most commonly reported primary outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Originally developed in 1989, the KSS was expanded and updated in 2011; however, the original KSS does not directly translate into the 2011 KSS. To date, no conversion algorithm has been developed, hindering the ability of researchers to adopt the 2011 KSS while maintaining their historical/longitudinal original KSS data. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES The purpose of this study is to develop regression equations to map the original KSS to the 2011 KSS, allowing original and 2011 KSS data sets to be combined. METHODS In this multicenter, nonrandomized study, a convenience sample of 815 patients undergoing primary TKA completed the original KSS questionnaire and the 2011 KSS questionnaire. Additionally, patient gender, patient age, and patient ethnicity were recorded. These data were then used to generate regression models to estimate the 2011 objective and function KSS from the original KSS. Of the 815 study patients, 476 (58%) were female and 339 (42%) were male at an average age of 67 years (SD 9.4). Roughly half of patients were assessed preoperatively (430 of 815 [53%]) with the remaining patients assessed postoperatively (386 of 815 [47%]). The average followup for postoperative patients was 4.4 years (SD 3.5 years). RESULTS We have created a spreadsheet that can be used by individuals with no statistical training to crosswalk the objective and function subscores from the original KSS to the 2011 KSS [Supplemental materials are available with the online version of CORR®.]. The predictive model very accurately estimated the 2011 objective score, on average, within 0.22 points on the 100-point 2011 objective KSS at the cohort or aggregate level. The objective model accurately estimated the 2011 objective KSS within 8.83 points, on average, of the actual 2011 objective KSS at the individual patient level. However, as a result of large outliers, 37% of the estimated 2011 objective KSS were greater than 10 points from the actual 2011 objective KSS. To illustrate, if you use the model to estimate the 2011 objective KSS on a cohort of 100 patients, a patient with an original objective KSS of 88 will have an estimated objective KSS between 79 and 97 points. On the other hand, if you calculate an average original objective KSS of 88 for all 100 patients, the estimated average 2011 objective KSS will be 88 for the group. The predictive model accurately estimated the 2011 function KSS within 0.14 points on the 1000-point 2011 function KSS at the cohort level. At the patient level, the 2011 function KSS was also estimated within 8.8 points of the actual 2011 function KSS. However, 43% of the estimated function scores were greater than 10 points of the actual 2011 function KSS. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians and researchers can input their original KSS with demographic data into these equations to estimate the 2011 KSS objective and function scores. The small prediction error of 0.22 points that we calculated indicates that these models can be used to estimate the 2011 objective and function KSS at the aggregated cohort level. Although the average error score was within 10 points at the individual patient level, there was a high percentage of large errors resulting from outliers in the data set. These outliers seemed to be related to patients with excellent range of motion who had substantial pain and limited function or patients who have poor range of motion with excellent function and little pain. This may be inherent with the KSS or with the study sample. Nevertheless, one must use caution when estimating at the patient level. Additionally, the accuracy of the prediction scores decreases if any of the demographic variables included in this study are not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M. Odum
- OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28207 USA
| | - Thomas K. Fehring
- grid.418446.b0000000404373867OrthoCarolina Hip & Knee Center, Charlotte, NC USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lewis DA, Kirkbride B, Vertullo CJ, Gordon L, Comans TA. Comparison of four alternative national universal anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention programme implementation strategies to reduce secondary future medical costs. Br J Sports Med 2016; 52:277-282. [PMID: 27993844 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common and devastating sporting injury. With or without ACL reconstruction, the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and permanent disability later in life is markedly increased. While neuromuscular training programmes can prevent 50-80% of ACL injuries, no national implementation strategies exist in Australia. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of four alternative national universal ACL injury prevention programme implementation strategies to reduce future medical costs secondary to ACL injury. METHODS A Markov economic decision model was constructed to estimate the value in lifetime future medical costs prevented by implementing a national ACL prevention programme among four hypothetical cohorts: high-risk sport participants (HR) aged 12-25 years; HR 18-25 years; HR 12-17 years; all youths (ALL) 12-17 years. RESULTS Of the four programmes examined, the HR 12-25 programme provided the greatest value, averting US$693 of direct healthcare costs per person per lifetime or US$221 870 880 in total. Without training, 9.4% of this cohort will rupture their ACL and 16.8% will develop knee OA. Training prevents 3764 lifetime ACL ruptures per 100 000 individuals, a 40% reduction in ACL injuries. 842 lifetime cases of OA per 100 000 individuals and 584 TKRs per 100 000 are subsequently averted. Numbers needed to treat ranged from 27 for the HR 12-25 to 190 for the ALL 12-17. CONCLUSIONS The HR 12-25 programme was the most effective implementation strategy. Estimation of the break-even cost of health expenditure savings will enable optimal future programme design, implementation and expenditure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dion A Lewis
- Knee Research Australia, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Brent Kirkbride
- Sydney Sport Medicine Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,New South Wales Institute of Sport, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher J Vertullo
- Knee Research Australia, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Louisa Gordon
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tracy A Comans
- New South Wales Institute of Sport, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Clarke A, Pulikottil-Jacob R, Grove A, Freeman K, Mistry H, Tsertsvadze A, Connock M, Court R, Kandala NB, Costa M, Suri G, Metcalfe D, Crowther M, Morrow S, Johnson S, Sutcliffe P. Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2015; 19:1-668, vii-viii. [PMID: 25634033 DOI: 10.3310/hta19100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total hip replacement (THR) involves the replacement of a damaged hip joint with an artificial hip prosthesis. Resurfacing arthroplasty (RS) involves replacement of the joint surface of the femoral head with a metal surface covering. OBJECTIVES To undertake clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of different types of THR and RS for the treatment of pain and disability in people with end-stage arthritis of the hip, in particular to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of (1) different types of primary THR and RS for people in whom both procedures are suitable and (2) different types of primary THR for people who are not suitable for hip RS. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Current Controlled Trials and UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN) Portfolio Database were searched in December 2012, with searches limited to publications from 2008 and sample sizes of ≥ 100 participants. Reference lists and websites of manufacturers and professional organisations were also screened. REVIEW METHODS Systematic reviews of the literature were undertaken to appraise the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different types of THR and RS for people with end-stage arthritis of the hip. Included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews were data extracted and risk of bias and methodological quality were independently assessed by two reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. A Markov multistate model was developed for the economic evaluation of the technologies. Sensitivity analyses stratified by sex and controlled for age were carried out to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS A total of 2469 records were screened of which 37 were included, representing 16 RCTs and eight systematic reviews. The mean post-THR Harris Hip Score measured at different follow-up times (from 6 months to 10 years) did not differ between THR groups, including between cross-linked polyethylene and traditional polyethylene cup liners (pooled mean difference 2.29, 95% confidence interval -0.88 to 5.45). Five systematic reviews reported evidence on different types of THR (cemented vs. cementless cup fixation and implant articulation materials) but these reviews were inconclusive. Eleven cost-effectiveness studies were included; four provided relevant cost and utility data for the model. Thirty registry studies were included, with no studies reporting better implant survival for RS than for all types of THR. For all analyses, mean costs for RS were higher than those for THR and mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were lower. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for RS was dominated by THR, that is, THR was cheaper and more effective than RS (for a lifetime horizon in the base-case analysis, the incremental cost of RS was £11,284 and the incremental QALYs were -0.0879). For all age and sex groups RS remained clearly dominated by THR. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that, for all patients, THR was almost 100% cost-effective at any willingness-to-pay level. There were age and sex differences in the populations with different types of THR and variations in revision rates (from 1.6% to 3.5% at 9 years). For the base-case analysis, for all age and sex groups and a lifetime horizon, mean costs for category E (cemented components with a polyethylene-on-ceramic articulation) were slightly lower and mean QALYs for category E were slightly higher than those for all other THR categories in both deterministic and probabilistic analyses. Hence, category E dominated the other four categories. Sensitivity analysis using an age- and sex-adjusted log-normal model demonstrated that, over a lifetime horizon and at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY, categories A and E were equally likely (50%) to be cost-effective. LIMITATIONS A large proportion of the included studies were inconclusive because of poor reporting, missing data, inconsistent results and/or great uncertainty in the treatment effect estimates. This warrants cautious interpretation of the findings. The evidence on complications was scarce, which may be because of the absence or rarity of these events or because of under-reporting. The poor reporting meant that it was not possible to explore contextual factors that might have influenced study results and also reduced the applicability of the findings to routine clinical practice in the UK. The scope of the review was limited to evidence published in English in 2008 or later, which could be interpreted as a weakness; however, systematic reviews would provide summary evidence for studies published before 2008. CONCLUSIONS Compared with THR, revision rates for RS were higher, mean costs for RS were higher and mean QALYs gained were lower; RS was dominated by THR. Similar results were obtained in the deterministic and probabilistic analyses and for all age and sex groups THR was almost 100% cost-effective at any willingness-to-pay level. Revision rates for all types of THR were low. Category A THR (cemented components with a polyethylene-on-metal articulation) was more cost-effective for older age groups. However, across all age-sex groups combined, the mean cost for category E THR (cemented components with a polyethylene-on-ceramic articulation) was slightly lower and the mean QALYs gained were slightly higher. Category E therefore dominated the other four categories. Certain types of THR appeared to confer some benefit, including larger femoral head sizes, use of a cemented cup, use of a cross-linked polyethylene cup liner and a ceramic-on-ceramic as opposed to a metal-on-polyethylene articulation. Further RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013003924. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen Clarke
- Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Amy Grove
- Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Karoline Freeman
- Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Hema Mistry
- Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Martin Connock
- Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Rachel Court
- Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Matthew Costa
- Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Gaurav Suri
- Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - David Metcalfe
- Warwick Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - Michael Crowther
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Sarah Morrow
- Oxford Medical School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Samantha Johnson
- Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Paul Sutcliffe
- Warwick Evidence, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Maidment ZL, Hordacre BG, Barr CJ. Effect of weekend physiotherapy provision on physiotherapy and hospital length of stay after total knee and total hip replacement. AUST HEALTH REV 2014; 38:265-70. [DOI: 10.1071/ah13232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2013] [Accepted: 02/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to investigate a change in physiotherapy provision from a 5- to 7-days-a-week service on both physiotherapy and hospital length of stay (LOS) after total knee (TKR) and total hip (THR) replacement. Methods A retrospective analysis of a clinical database was conducted for patients who received either a TKR or THR between July 2010 and June 2012 in one regional hospital. Results There was a significant decrease in physiotherapy LOS from 5.0 days (interquartile range (IQR) 5.0–6.0 days) for a 5-day physiotherapy service, to 5.0 days (IQR 4.0–5.0 days) for 7-day physiotherapy service (U = 1443.5, z = –4.62, P = 0.001). However, hospital LOS was not reduced (P = 0.110). For TKR, physiotherapy LOS decreased significantly by 1 day with a 7-day physiotherapy service (U = 518.0, z = –4.20, P = 0.001). However, hospital LOS was again no different (P = 0.309). For THR there was no difference in physiotherapy LOS (P = 0.060) or hospital LOS (P = 0.303) between the 5- and 7-day physiotherapy services. Where physiotherapy LOS was less than hospital LOS, delayed discharge was due primarily to non-medical issues (72%) associated with hospital organisational aspects. Conclusions Increasing the provision of physiotherapy service after TKR provides an increase in physiotherapy sessions and has the potential to reduce hospital LOS. To be effective this must align with other administrative aspects of hospital discharge. What is known about the topic? Previous studies have investigated the effect of increasing physiotherapy services following total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, with varying reports of decreased or unaffected hospital length of stay (LOS). What does this paper add? This study investigates both hospital and physiotherapy LOS individually for THR and TKR patients following an increase from a 5- to 7-day physiotherapy service. Where physiotherapy LOS decreased and hospital LOS did not, delays in hospital discharge were investigated. What are the implications for practitioners? Additional physiotherapy services decrease physiotherapy LOS for TKR patients, but administrative aspects of hospital discharge must improve to reduce hospital LOS.
Collapse
|
14
|
Buhagiar MA, Naylor JM, Harris IA, Xuan W, Kohler F, Wright RJ, Fortunato R. Hospital Inpatient versus HOme-based rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty (The HIHO study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14:432. [PMID: 24341348 PMCID: PMC3878550 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2013] [Accepted: 11/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Formal rehabilitation programs are often assumed to be required after total knee arthroplasty to optimize patient recovery. Inpatient rehabilitation is a costly rehabilitation option after total knee arthroplasty and, in Australia, is utilized most frequently for privately insured patients. With the exception of comparisons with domiciliary services, no randomized trial has compared inpatient rehabilitation to any outpatient based program. The Hospital Inpatient versus HOme (HIHO) study primarily aims to determine whether 10 days of post-acute inpatient rehabilitation followed by a hybrid home program provides superior recovery of functional mobility on the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) compared to a hybrid home program alone following total knee arthroplasty. Secondarily, the trial aims to determine whether inpatient rehabilitation yields superior recovery in patient-reported function. METHODS/DESIGN This is a two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT), with a third, non-randomized, observational group. One hundred and forty eligible, consenting participants who have undergone a primary total knee arthroplasty at a high-volume joint replacement center will be randomly allocated when cleared for discharge from acute care to either 10 days of inpatient rehabilitation followed by usual care (a 6-week hybrid home program) or to usual care. Seventy participants in each group (140 in total) will provide 80% power at a significance level of 5% to detect an increase in walking capacity from 400 m to 460 m between the Home and Inpatient groups, respectively, in the 6MWT at 6 months post-surgery, assuming a SD of 120 m and a drop-out rate of <10%.The outcome assessor will assess participants at 10, 26 and 52 weeks post-operatively, and will remain blind to group allocation for the duration of the study, as will the statistician. Participant preference for rehabilitation mode stated prior to randomization will be accounted for in the analysis together with any baseline differences in potentially confounding characteristics as required. DISCUSSION The HIHO Trial will be the first RCT to investigate the efficacy of inpatient rehabilitation compared to any outpatient alternative following total knee arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry (http://clinicaltrials.gov) ref: NCT01583153.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Buhagiar
- Braeside Hospital, HammondCare, Locked Bag 82, Wetherill Park 2164, NSW, Australia
- South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Drive, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Justine M Naylor
- South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Drive, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- South West Sydney Local Health District, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool 2170NSW, Australia
- Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, PO Box 906, Caringbah, NSW 2229, Australia
- 5Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, PO Box 3151Westfields Liverpool, Liverpool 2170NSW, Australia
| | - Ian A Harris
- South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Drive, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- South West Sydney Local Health District, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool 2170NSW, Australia
- Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, PO Box 906, Caringbah, NSW 2229, Australia
- 5Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, PO Box 3151Westfields Liverpool, Liverpool 2170NSW, Australia
| | - Wei Xuan
- South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Drive, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- 5Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, PO Box 3151Westfields Liverpool, Liverpool 2170NSW, Australia
| | - Friedbert Kohler
- Braeside Hospital, HammondCare, Locked Bag 82, Wetherill Park 2164, NSW, Australia
- South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Drive, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
- South West Sydney Local Health District, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool 2170NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael J Wright
- South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Drive, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Renee Fortunato
- South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital, Elizabeth Drive, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mak JCS, Fransen M, Jennings M, March L, Mittal R, Harris IA. Evidence-based review for patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacement. ANZ J Surg 2013; 84:17-24. [PMID: 23496209 DOI: 10.1111/ans.12109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence for different interventions in the preoperative, perioperative and post-operative care for people undergoing elective total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacement surgery. METHOD A multidisciplinary working group comprising consumers, managers and clinicians from the areas of orthopaedics, rheumatology, aged care and rehabilitation evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews/meta-analyses concerning aspects of preoperative, perioperative and post-operative clinical care periods for THR/TKR through systematic searching of Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from May 2007 to April 2011. Multiple reviewers determined study eligibility and one or more members extracted primary study findings. The body of evidence were assessed and specific recommendations made according to NHMRC guidelines. RESULTS Twenty-five aspects were identified for review. Recommendations for 16 of 25 areas of care were made: impact of waiting, multidisciplinary preparation, preoperative exercise, smoking cessation, interventions for comorbid conditions, predictors of outcome, clinical pathways, implementation of a blood management programme, antibiotic prophylaxis, regional anaesthesia and analgesia, use of a tourniquet in knee replacement, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, early post-operative cryotherapy, early mobilization and continuous passive motion. In the post-operative period, study heterogeneity across all aspects of care precluded specific recommendations. CONCLUSIONS There was a deficiency in the quality of the evidence supporting key aspects of the continuum of care for primary THR/TKR surgery. Consequently, recommendations were limited. Prioritization and funding for research into areas likely to impact clinical practice and patient outcomes after elective joint replacement surgery are the next important steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenson C S Mak
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medicine, Ryde Hospital, Eastwood, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jenkins PJ, Clement ND, Hamilton DF, Gaston P, Patton JT, Howie CR. Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: a health economic analysis. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B:115-21. [PMID: 23307684 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b1.29835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 243] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to perform a cost-utility analysis of total hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR). Arthritis is a disabling condition that leads to long-term deterioration in quality of life. Total joint replacement, despite being one of the greatest advances in medicine of the modern era, has recently come under scrutiny. The National Health Service (NHS) has competing demands, and resource allocation is challenging in times of economic restraint. Patients who underwent THR (n = 348) or TKR (n = 323) between January and July 2010 in one Scottish region were entered into a prospective arthroplasty database. A health-utility score was derived from the EuroQol (EQ-5D) score pre-operatively and at one year, and was combined with individual life expectancy to derive the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare QALYs gained between procedures, while controlling for baseline differences. The number of QALYs gained was higher after THR than after TKR (6.5 vs 4.0 years, p < 0.001). The cost per QALY for THR was £1372 compared with £2101 for TKR. The predictors of an increase in QALYs gained were poorer health before surgery (p < 0.001) and younger age (p < 0.001). General health (EQ-5D VAS) showed greater improvement after THR than after TKR (p < 0.001). This study provides up-to-date cost-effectiveness data for total joint replacement. THR and TKR are extremely effective both clinically and in terms of cost effectiveness, with costs that compare favourably to those of other medical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Jenkins
- University of Edinburgh, Department of Orthopaedics, Chancellor's Building, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Crawford DC, Miller LE, Block JE. Conservative management of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a flawed strategy? Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2013; 5:e2. [PMID: 23705060 PMCID: PMC3662262 DOI: 10.4081/or.2013.e2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2012] [Accepted: 10/12/2012] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Conservative management of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a misleading term used to describe the application of medical, orthotic, and/or rehabilitative therapies exclusive of surgical interventions. The implication of this nomenclature is that these therapies offer satisfactory symptom relief, alter disease progression, and have limited side effects. Unfortunately, conservative therapeutic options possesses few, if any, characteristics of an ideal treatment, namely one that significantly alleviates pain, improves knee function, and reduces medial compartmental loading without adverse side effects. As uncompensated mechanical loading is a primary culprit in the development and progression of knee OA, we propose that the therapeutic perspective of conservative treatment should shift from pharmacological treatments, which have no influence on joint loading, minimal potential to alter joint function, substantial associated risks, and significant financial costs, towards minimally invasive load absorbing therapeutic interventions. A safe and effective minimally invasive medical device specifically engineered for symptomatic relief of medial knee OA by limiting joint contact forces has the potential to reduce the clinical and economic knee OA burden. This review characterizes the current standard of care recommendations for conservative management of medial compartment knee OA with respect to treatment efficacy, risk profile, and economic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis C Crawford
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Petrillo J, Cairns J. Converting condition-specific measures into preference-based outcomes for use in economic evaluation. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2012; 8:453-61. [PMID: 20528330 DOI: 10.1586/14737167.8.5.453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) play an important role in reimbursement decisions when one of the criteria is the cost-effectiveness of the health technology. While for many generic QALYs (e.g., based on the EQ-5D) are viewed as the gold standard, there has been a considerable increase in interest in using condition-specific data to generate QALYs. There are two main methods: mapping from the condition-specific data to a generic health-related quality of life measure; and direct valuation of condition-specific health states. Whether one believes condition-specific data are useful even if generic QALY data are available, or simply that condition-specific data are helpful in the absence of generic measures of health-related quality of life, it is timely to review recent research activity directed at making greater use of condition-specific data to inform assessments of cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Petrillo
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; United BioSource Corporation, 20 Bloomsbury Square, London WC1A 2NS, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ramsey DK, Russell ME. Unloader braces for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: implications on mediating progression. Sports Health 2012; 1:416-26. [PMID: 23015902 PMCID: PMC3445170 DOI: 10.1177/1941738109343157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: For persons with unicompartment knee osteoarthritis (OA), off-unloader braces are a mechanical intervention designed to reduce pain, improve physical function, and possibly slow disease progression. Pain relief is thought to be mediated by distracting the involved compartment via external varus or valgus forces applied to the knee. In so doing, tibiofemoral alignment is improved, and load is shifted off the degenerative compartment, where exposure to potentially damaging and provocative mechanical stresses are reduced. Objectives: To provide a synopsis of the evidence documented in the scientific literature concerning the efficacy of off-loader knee braces for improving symptomatology associated with painful disabling medial compartment knee OA. Search Strategy: Relevant peer-reviewed publications were retrieved from a MEDLINE search using the terms with the reference terms osteoarthritis, knee, and braces (per Medical Subject Headings), plus a manual search of bibliographies from original and review articles and appropriate Internet resources. Results: For persons with combined unicompartment knee OA and mild to moderate instability, the strength of recommendation reported by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International in the ability of off-loader knee braces to reduce pain, improve stability, and diminish the risk of falling was 76% (95% confidence interval, 69%-83%). The more evidence the treatment is effective, the higher the percentage. Conclusions: Given the encouraging evidence that off-loader braces are effective in mediating pain relief in conjunction with knee OA and malalignment, bracing should be fully used before joint realignment or replacement surgery is considered. With the number of patients with varus deformities and knee pain predicted to increase as the population ages, a reduction of patient morbidity for this widespread chronic condition in combination with this treatment modality could have a positive impact on health care costs and the economic productivity and quality of life of the affected individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan K Ramsey
- Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Haas M, Hall J, Viney R, Gallego G. Breaking up is hard to do: why disinvestment in medical technology is harder than investment. AUST HEALTH REV 2012; 36:148-52. [DOI: 10.1071/ah11032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2011] [Accepted: 09/14/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Healthcare technology is a two-edged sword - it offers new and better treatment to a wider range of people and, at the same time, is a major driver of increasing costs in health systems. Many countries have developed sophisticated systems of health technology assessment (HTA) to inform decisions about new investments in new healthcare interventions. In this paper, we question whether HTA is also the appropriate framework for guiding or informing disinvestment decisions. In exploring the issues related to disinvestment, we first discuss the various HTA frameworks which have been suggested as a means of encouraging or facilitating disinvestment. We then describe available means of identifying candidates for disinvestment (comparative effectiveness research, clinical practice variations, clinical practice guidelines) and for implementing the disinvestment process (program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) and related techniques). In considering the possible reasons for the lack of progress in active disinvestment, we suggest that HTA is not the right framework as disinvestment involves a different decision making context. The key to disinvestment is not just what to stop doing but how to make it happen - that is, decision makers need to be aware of funding disincentives. What is known about this topic? Disinvestment is an increasingly popular topic amongst academics and policy makers. Most discussions focus on the need to increase disinvestment as a corollary of investment, the lack of overt disinvestment decisions and the use of a framework based on health technology assessment (HTA) to implement disinvestment. What does this paper add? This paper focusses on the difficulties associated with deciding which technologies to disinvest in, and the problems in using an HTA framework to make such decisions, when disinvestment involves a different decision making context from that of investment. What are the implications for practitioners? The key to disinvestment is not just what to stop doing but how to implement such decisions. Making it happen means being aware of funding disincentives.
Collapse
|
21
|
London NJ, Miller LE, Block JE. Clinical and economic consequences of the treatment gap in knee osteoarthritis management. Med Hypotheses 2011; 76:887-92. [PMID: 21440373 DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.02.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2010] [Accepted: 02/27/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis affects 27 million American adults of all ages and is a leading cause of disability in middle-aged and older adults. Initial management of knee osteoarthritis symptoms utilizes conservative care although long-term efficacy is poor. Arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy may be considered for patients with severe pain or disability. We hypothesize that a distinct treatment gap exists for the patient with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis who is unresponsive to conservative care (including simple surgical treatments) yet refuses to undergo or is not an appropriate candidate for more invasive surgical procedures. This treatment gap represents a protracted period in which the patient experiences debilitating pain, reduced quality of life, and a significant financial burden. Approximately 3.6 million Americans linger in the knee osteoarthritis treatment gap and this number will grow to about 5 million people by 2025. The typical knee osteoarthritis treatment gap extends 20 years although the younger osteoarthritis patient is faced with the treatment gap throughout the majority of their adult life. There is great need for a safe, effective, and cost effective treatment option for patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis that enjoys high patient acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J London
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harrogate District Foundation Trust, Harrogate HG2 7SX, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Uhlig T, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Moe RH, Kvien TK. The burden of osteoarthritis:the societal and the patient perspective. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010. [DOI: 10.2217/thy.10.70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
23
|
Brazier JE, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A, Rowen DL. A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2010; 11:215-25. [PMID: 19585162 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-009-0168-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 375] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2008] [Accepted: 06/16/2009] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Clinical studies use a wide variety of health status measures to measure health related quality of life, many of which cannot be used in cost-effectiveness analysis using cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY). Mapping is one solution that is gaining popularity as it enables health state utility values to be predicted for use in cost per QALY analysis when no preference-based measure has been included in the study. This paper presents a systematic review of current practice in mapping between non-preference based measures and generic preference-based measures, addressing feasibility and validity, circumstances under which it should be considered and lessons for future mapping studies. This review found 30 studies reporting 119 different models. Performance of the mappings functions in terms of goodness-of-fit and prediction was variable and unable to be generalised across instruments. Where generic measures are not regarded as appropriate for a condition, mapping does not solve this problem. Most testing in the literature occurs at the individual level yet the main purpose of these functions is to predict mean values for subgroups of patients, hence more testing is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John E Brazier
- Health Economics and Decision Science, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Segal L, Dalziel K, Mortimer D. Fixing the game: are between-silo differences in funding arrangements handicapping some interventions and giving others a head-start? HEALTH ECONOMICS 2010; 19:449-465. [PMID: 19382172 DOI: 10.1002/hec.1483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Given resource scarcity, not all potentially beneficial health services can be funded. Choices are made, if not explicitly, implicitly as some health services are funded and others are not. But what are the primary influences on those choices? We sought to test whether funding decisions are linked to cost effectiveness and to quantify the influence of funding arrangements and community values arguments. We tested this via empirical analysis of 245 Australian health-care interventions for which cost-effectiveness estimates had been published. The likelihood of government funding was modelled as a function of cost effectiveness, patient/target group characteristics, intervention characteristics and publication characteristics, using multiple regression analysis. We found that higher cost effectiveness ratios were a significant predictor of funding rejection, but that cost effectiveness was not related to the level of funding. Intervention characteristics linked to funding and delivery arrangements and community values arguments were significant predictors of funding outcomes. Our analysis supports the hypothesis that funding and delivery arrangements influence both whether an intervention is funded and funding level; even after controlling for community values and cost effectiveness. It suggests that adopting partial priority setting processes without regard to opportunity cost can have the perverse effect of compounding allocative inefficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Segal
- Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Market failure, policy failure and other distortions in chronic disease markets. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9:102. [PMID: 19534822 PMCID: PMC2704185 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2008] [Accepted: 06/18/2009] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing prevalence of chronic disease represents a significant burden on most health systems. This paper explores the market failures and policy failures that exist in the management of chronic diseases. Discussion There are many sources of market failure in health care that undermine the efficiency of chronic disease management. These include incomplete information as well as information asymmetry between providers and consumers, the effect of externalities on consumer behaviour, and the divergence between social and private time preference rates. This has seen government and policy interventions to address both market failures and distributional issues resulting from the inability of private markets to reach an efficient and equitable distribution of resources. However, these have introduced a series of policy failures such as distorted re-imbursement arrangements across modalities and delivery settings. Summary The paper concludes that market failure resulting from a preference of individuals for 'immediate gratification' in the form of health care and disease management, rather than preventative services, where the benefits are delayed, has a major impact on achieving an efficient allocation of resources in markets for the management of chronic diseases. This distortion is compounded by government health policy that tends to favour medical and pharmaceutical interventions further contributing to distortions in the allocation of resources and inefficiencies in the management of chronic disease.
Collapse
|
26
|
Mortimer D, Segal L, Sturm J. Can we derive an 'exchange rate' between descriptive and preference-based outcome measures for stroke? Results from the transfer to utility (TTU) technique. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009; 7:33. [PMID: 19371444 PMCID: PMC2680400 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2007] [Accepted: 04/17/2009] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stroke-specific outcome measures and descriptive measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are unsuitable for informing decision-makers of the broader consequences of increasing or decreasing funding for stroke interventions. The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) provides a common metric for comparing interventions over multiple dimensions of HRQoL and mortality differentials. There are, however, many circumstances when – because of timing, lack of foresight or cost considerations – only stroke-specific or descriptive measures of health status are available and some indirect means of obtaining QALY-weights becomes necessary. In such circumstances, the use of regression-based transformations or mappings can circumvent the failure to elicit QALY-weights by allowing predicted weights to proxy for observed weights. This regression-based approach has been dubbed 'Transfer to Utility' (TTU) regression. The purpose of the present study is to demonstrate the feasibility and value of TTU regression in stroke by deriving transformations or mappings from stroke-specific and generic but descriptive measures of health status to a generic preference-based measure of HRQoL in a sample of Australians with a diagnosis of acute stroke. Findings will quantify the additional error associated with the use of condition-specific to generic transformations in stroke. Methods We used TTU regression to derive empirical transformations from three commonly used descriptive measures of health status for stroke (NIHSS, Barthel and SF-36) to a preference-based measure (AQoL) suitable for attaching QALY-weights to stroke disease states; based on 2570 observations drawn from a sample of 859 patients with stroke. Results Transformations from the SF-36 to the AQoL explained up to 71.5% of variation in observed AQoL scores. Differences between mean predicted and mean observed AQoL scores from the 'severity-specific' item- and subscale-based SF-36 algorithms and from the 'moderate to severe' index- and item-based Barthel algorithm were neither clinically nor statistically significant when 'low severity' SF-36 transformations were used to predict AQoL scores for patients in the NIHSS = 0 and NIHSS = 1–5 subgroups and when 'moderate to severe severity' transformations were used to predict AQoL scores for patients in the NIHSS ≥ 6 subgroup. In contrast, the difference between mean predicted and mean observed AQoL scores from the NIHSS algorithms and from the 'low severity' Barthel algorithms reached levels that could mask minimally important differences on the AQoL scale. Conclusion While our NIHSS to AQoL transformations proved unsuitable for most applications, our findings demonstrate that stroke-relevant outcome measures such as the SF-36 and Barthel Index can be adequately transformed to preference-based measures for the purposes of economic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan Mortimer
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Building 75, The Strip, Clayton 3800, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brand CA, Amatya B, Gordon B, Tosti T, Gorelik A. Redesigning care for chronic conditions: improving hospital-based ambulatory care for people with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Intern Med J 2009; 40:427-36. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01960.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
28
|
Hunter DJ, McDougall JJ, Keefe FJ. The symptoms of osteoarthritis and the genesis of pain. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2008; 34:623-43. [PMID: 18687276 DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2008.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 256] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) causes substantial physical and psychosocial disability. This article delineates the characteristic symptoms and signs associated with OA and how they can be used to make the clinical diagnosis. The predominant symptom in most patients is pain. The remainder of the article focuses on what is known about the causes of pain in OA and factors that contribute to its severity. Much has been learned during recent years, but much of this puzzle remains unexplored or inadequately understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Hunter
- Division of Research, New England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Avenue, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Deriving utility scores from the SF-36 health instrument using Rasch analysis. Qual Life Res 2008; 17:1183-93. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9395-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2007] [Accepted: 09/04/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
30
|
Segal L, Dalziel K, Bolton T. A work force model to support the adoption of best practice care in chronic diseases - a missing piece in clinical guideline implementation. Implement Sci 2008; 3:35. [PMID: 18559116 PMCID: PMC2442607 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2007] [Accepted: 06/18/2008] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The development and implementation of an evidence-based approach to health workforce planning is a necessary step to achieve access to best practice chronic disease management. In its absence, the widely reported failure in implementation of clinical best practice guidelines is almost certain to continue. This paper describes a demand model to estimate the community-based primary care health workforce consistent with the delivery of best practice chronic disease management and prevention. The model takes a geographic region as the planning frame and combines data about the health status of the regional population by disease category and stage, with best practice guidelines to estimate the clinical skill requirement or competencies for the region. The translation of the skill requirement into a service requirement can then be modelled, incorporating various assumptions about the occupation group to deliver nominated competencies. The service requirement, when compared with current service delivery, defines the gap or surplus in services. The results of the model could be used to inform service delivery as well as a workforce supply strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Segal
- Health Economics and Policy Group, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ruchlin HS, Insinga RP. A review of health-utility data for osteoarthritis: implications for clinical trial-based evaluation. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2008; 26:925-935. [PMID: 18850762 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200826110-00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this review was to describe the performance of health-utility measures in valuing the quality-of-life (QOL) impact of changes in osteoarthritis (OA)-related chronic pain when administered within a clinical trial setting. Because the collection of utility data within a clinical trial is not always feasible in the development of health economic models, utility data from prior non-randomised studies conducted among patients with OA were also summarized.We conducted a literature review using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases. We selected studies employing validated direct and multi-attribute measures of health utility: the standard gamble, time trade-off, EuroQol index, Health Utilities Index, SF-6D, 15D and the Assessment of Quality of Life measure.We identified four randomized controlled trials and 17 observational studies. The results of prior clinical trials in which these health utility measures were used in evaluating OA are summarized and attributes of the utility measures such as the clinical importance and statistical significance of the results obtained are noted. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the utility measure to changes in co-administered non-utility based measures of health-related quality of life (e.g. visual analogue scale for pain, WOMACtrade mark) are also reported. Five findings emerged.First, the EQ-5D system was the most widely used metric to derive utilities. Second, for whatever utility measure was used, reported mean utilities for patient groups spanned a rather wide range of values across studies, potentially reflecting variation in illness severity, patient co-morbidities and/or patient treatment. Third, when studies reported more than one utility-based statistic, the utility valuations frequently differed by measure, suggesting that the choice of metric can potentially have an effect on QALY calculations. However, there was no consistent pattern as to which measure yielded the highest and lowest utility valuations. Fourth, changes in health-related QOL (HR-QOL) and utility measures displayed the expected relationships. When HR-QOL declined, the utility values also moved in this direction. The reverse was also true. In some instances, statistically significant changes in QOL measures were not mirrored by statistically significant changes in utility measures, suggesting that some studies may have been underpowered for the latter purpose. Finally, the body of clinical trial-based utility literature in OA was found to be relatively modest, with considerably more observational studies collecting utility data.Based on the limited number of trial-based health-utility evaluations in OA to date, there can potentially be divergent findings with respect to clinical and statistical significance of changes in utility measures and corresponding measures of health status. Analysts should carefully evaluate issues of statistical power and clinical sensitivity in utilizing these measures in clinical trials of OA interventions.
Collapse
|
32
|
Ramsey DK, Briem K, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. A mechanical theory for the effectiveness of bracing for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89:2398-407. [PMID: 17974881 PMCID: PMC3217466 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.f.01136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence that knee braces used for the treatment of osteoarthritis mediate pain relief and improve function by unloading the joint (increasing the joint separation) remains inconclusive. Alternatively, valgus-producing braces may mediate pain relief by mechanically stabilizing the joint and reducing muscle cocontractions and joint compression. In this study, therefore, we sought to examine the degree to which so-called unloader braces control knee instability and influence muscle cocontractions during gait. METHODS Sixteen subjects with radiographic evidence of knee malalignment and medial compartment osteoarthritis were recruited and fitted with a custom Generation II Unloader brace. Gait analysis was performed without use of the brace and with the brace in neutral alignment and in 4 degrees of valgus alignment. A two-week washout period separated the brace conditions. Muscle cocontraction indices were derived for agonist and antagonist muscle pairings. Pain, instability, and functional status were obtained with use of self-reported questionnaires, and the results were compared. RESULTS The scores for pain, function, and stability were worst when the knee was unsupported (the baseline and washout conditions). At baseline, nine of the sixteen patients reported knee instability and five of the nine complained that it affected their activities of daily living. Poor knee stability was found to be correlated with low ratings for the activities of daily living, quality of life, and global knee function and with increased pain and symptoms. Knee function and stability scored best with the brace in the neutral setting compared with the brace in the valgus setting. The cocontraction of the vastus lateralis-lateral hamstrings was significantly reduced from baseline in both the neutral (p = 0.014) and valgus conditions (p = 0.023), and the cocontraction of the vastus medialis-medial hamstrings was significantly reduced with the valgus setting (p = 0.068), as a result of bracing. Patients with greater varus alignment had greater decreases in vastus lateralis-lateral hamstring muscle cocontraction. CONCLUSIONS When knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis are braced, neutral alignment performs as well as or better than valgus alignment in reducing pain, disability, muscle cocontraction, and knee adduction excursions. Pain relief may result from diminished muscle cocontractions rather than from so-called medial compartment unloading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan K Ramsey
- Department of Exercise and Nutrition Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 214 Kimball Tower, South Campus, Buffalo, NY 14214-8028, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mortimer D, Segal L. Comparing the Incomparable? A Systematic Review of Competing Techniques for Converting Descriptive Measures of Health Status into QALY-Weights. Med Decis Making 2007; 28:66-89. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x07309642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background . Algorithms for converting descriptive measures of health status into quality-adjusted life year (QALY)—weights are now widely available, and their application in economic evaluation is increasingly commonplace. The objective of this study is to describe and compare existing conversion algorithms and to highlight issues bearing on the derivation and interpretation of the QALY-weights so obtained. Methods . Systematic review of algorithms for converting descriptive measures of health status into QALY-weights. Results . The review identified a substantial body of literature comprising 46 derivation studies and 16 studies that provided evidence or commentary on the validity of conversion algorithms. Conversion algorithms were derived using 1 of 4 techniques: 1) transfer to utility regression, 2) response mapping, 3) effect size translation, and 4) “revaluing” outcome measures using preference-based scaling techniques. Although these techniques differ in their methodological/theoretical tradition, data requirements, and ease of derivation and application, the available evidence suggests that the sensitivity and validity of derived QALY-weights may be more dependent on the coverage and sensitivity of measures and the disease area/patient group under evaluation than on the technique used in derivation. Conclusions . Despite the recent proliferation of conversion algorithms, a number of questions bearing on the derivation and interpretation of derived QALY-weights remain unresolved. These unresolved issues suggest directions for future research in this area. In the meantime, analysts seeking guidance in selecting derived QALY-weights should consider the validity and feasibility of each conversion algorithm in the disease area and patient group under evaluation rather than restricting their choice to weights from a particular derivation technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan Mortimer
- Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Business & Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia,
| | - Leonie Segal
- Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Business & Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Räsänen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, Koivisto AM, Blom M, Ryynänen OP, Roine RP. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop 2007; 78:108-15. [PMID: 17453401 DOI: 10.1080/17453670610013501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 277] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent head-to-head comparisons of healthcare interventions regarding cost-utility are rare. The concept of favorable cost-effectiveness of total hip or knee arthroplasty is thus inadequately verified. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a trial involving several thousand patients from 10 medical specialties, 223 patients who were enrolled for hip or knee replacement surgery were asked to fill in the 15D health-related quality of life (HRQoL) survey before and after operation. RESULTS Mean (SD) HRQoL score (on a 0-1 scale) increased in primary hip replacement patients (n = 96) from 0.81 (0.084) preoperatively to 0.86 (0.12) at 12 months (p < 0.001). In revision hip replacement (n = 24) the corresponding scores were 0.81 (0.086) and 0.82 (0.097) respectively (p = 0.4), and in knee replacement (n = 103) the scores were 0.81 (0.093) and 0.84 (0.11) respectively (p < 0.001). Of 15 health dimensions, there were statistically significant improvements in moving, usual activities, discomfort and symptoms, distress, and vitality in both primary replacement groups. Mean cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained during a 1-year period was euro 6,710 for primary hip replacement, euro 52,274 for revision hip replacement, and euro 13,995 for primary knee replacement. INTERPRETATION Hip and knee replacement both improve HRQoL. The cost per QALY gained from knee replacement is twice that gained from hip replacement.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/psychology
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/psychology
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Osteoarthritis, Hip/psychology
- Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery
- Osteoarthritis, Knee/psychology
- Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery
- Quality of Life
- Quality-Adjusted Life Years
- Reoperation
- Surveys and Questionnaires
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pirjo Räsänen
- Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital Group, Group Administration, P.O. Box 100, HUS 00029, Finland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wells V, Hearn T, Heard A, Lange K, Rankin W, Graves S. Incidence and outcomes of knee and hip joint replacement in veterans and civilians. ANZ J Surg 2006; 76:295-9. [PMID: 16768685 DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03716.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This article describes the incidence of total knee and hip replacement, and compares post-surgery health status outcomes in veterans and civilians. METHODS The numbers of male veterans and civilians who had a knee and/or a hip replacement in South Australia (1994-2002) were obtained. Standardized morbidity ratios, and odds ratios for age group by veteran/civilian interactions, were calculated. Presurgery and 1-year post-surgery Medical Outcomes Short Form (36) Health Survey, Knee Society and Harris hip scores were completed. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare presurgery scores. ancova models were used to determine any differences between veterans and civilians post-surgery. RESULTS For veterans, standardized morbidity ratios were 0.987 and 0.715 for knee and hip replacements, respectively (P < 0.0001). Veterans' odds ratios for knee and hip replacements were significantly lower in the 65- to 74-year age group (P < 0.001), similar in the 75- to 84-year and above 85-year age groups for hip replacement, but significantly higher in the above 85-year age group for knee replacement (P < 0.001). Presurgery, veterans reported significantly lower scores (P < 0.003) for knee function. After knee replacement, veterans reported significantly lower Medical Outcomes Short Form (36) Health Survey scores for bodily pain, physical functioning, role - physical, role--emotional, social functioning and physical component summary (P < 0.033). Significantly lower physical functioning, role--physical and physical component summary scores (P < 0.02) were reported by veterans post-surgery for hip replacement. CONCLUSION Veterans are delaying joint replacement. Presurgical knee function is worse in veterans. Post-surgery, the veterans are worse off in a number of health status outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Wells
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flinders University School of Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre and Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, SA, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Naylor J, Harmer A, Fransen M, Crosbie J, Innes L. Status of physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee replacement in Australia. PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2006; 11:35-47. [PMID: 16594314 DOI: 10.1002/pri.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Owing to a scarcity of clinical research, evidence-based clinical guidelines are not available to guide physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee replacement surgery. This is despite the fact that, annually, over 20000 patients in Australia, over 300 000 patients in North America and 36 000 patients in the UK potentially require rehabilitation at this time to regain functional independence and to resume recreational and work-related physical activities. This survey of clinicians aimed to describe standard (usual) care after total knee replacement in Australia and to provide possible explanations for practice variance, if such variation exists. METHOD A nationwide postal survey involving public and privately funded hospital physiotherapy departments was conducted. Purposive sampling was used to randomly select hospitals from the National Joint Replacement Registry. A series of closed and open-ended protocol-based questions were asked. RESULTS A response rate of 65% (65/100) was obtained. Elements of consistency and diversity across the acute and post-acute phases were evident. Consistent findings included the provision of gait retraining and exercise prescription in the acute period, the requirement for independent ambulation as a criterion for discharge from acute care and the routine referral to ongoing outpatient or community-based physiotherapy. Less consistency was reported for the use of continuous passive motion and cryotherapy in the acute phase, the modes of ongoing rehabilitation, discharge from rehabilitation criteria and the tools for measuring outcomes. Both institutional and non-institutional factors appeared to explain the demonstrated practice variation. CONCLUSIONS In order to propagate evidence-based practice guidelines and uniformity in care, well-designed clinical trials are required to identify cost-effective rehabilitation programmes after total knee replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Naylor
- Whitlam Joint Replacement Centre, Fairfield Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Brooks PM. The burden of musculoskeletal disease--a global perspective. Clin Rheumatol 2006; 25:778-81. [PMID: 16609823 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-006-0240-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 326] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2005] [Accepted: 12/13/2005] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Musculoskeletal diseases are one of the major causes of disability around the world and have been a significant reason for the development of the Bone and Joint Decade. Rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and back pain are important causes of disability-adjusted-life years in both the developed and developing world. COPCORD studies in over 17 countries around the world have identified back and knee pain as common in the community and are likely to increase with the ageing population. Musculoskeletal conditions are an enormous cost to the community in economic terms, and these figures emphasise how governments need to invest in the future and look at ways of reducing the burden of musculoskeletal diseases by encouraging exercise and obesity prevention campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M Brooks
- Health Sciences, University of Queensland Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Segal L, Mortimer D. A population-based model for priority setting across the care continuum and across modalities. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2006; 4:6. [PMID: 16566841 PMCID: PMC1481504 DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-4-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2005] [Accepted: 03/28/2006] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Health-sector Wide (HsW) priority setting model is designed to shift the focus of priority setting away from 'program budgets'--that are typically defined by modality or disease-stage--and towards well-defined target populations with a particular disease/health problem. METHODS The key features of the HsW model are i) a disease/health problem framework, ii) a sequential approach to covering the entire health sector, iii) comprehensiveness of scope in identifying intervention options and iv) the use of objective evidence. The HsW model redefines the unit of analysis over which priorities are set to include all mutually exclusive and complementary interventions for the prevention and treatment of each disease/health problem under consideration. The HsW model is therefore incompatible with the fragmented approach to priority setting across multiple program budgets that currently characterises allocation in many health systems. The HsW model employs standard cost-utility analyses and decision-rules with the aim of maximising QALYs contingent upon the global budget constraint for the set of diseases/health problems under consideration. It is recognised that the objective function may include non-health arguments that would imply a departure from simple QALY maximisation and that political constraints frequently limit degrees of freedom. In addressing these broader considerations, the HsW model can be modified to maximise value-weighted QALYs contingent upon the global budget constraint and any political constraints bearing upon allocation decisions. RESULTS The HsW model has been applied in several contexts, recently to osteoarthritis, that has demonstrated both its practical application and its capacity to derive clear evidenced-based policy recommendations. CONCLUSION Comparisons with other approaches to priority setting, such as Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis (PBMA) and modality-based cost-effectiveness comparisons, as typified by Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee process for the listing of pharmaceuticals for government funding, demonstrate the value added by the HsW model notably in its greater likelihood of contributing to allocative efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Segal
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Duncan Mortimer
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Whitfield K, Buchbinder R, Segal L, Osborne RH. Parsimonious and efficient assessment of health-related quality of life in osteoarthritis research: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4:19. [PMID: 16556304 PMCID: PMC1538577 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2005] [Accepted: 03/23/2006] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) utility instrument was psychometrically developed for the general population. This study aimed to explore its potential as an osteoarthritis (OA) outcome measure. METHODS WOMAC, Lequesne index, SF-36, Visual analogue scales and the AQoL were administered to 222 people with OA. The ability of each questionnaire to detect differences between groups was based on (i) self-rated health (SRH) and, (ii) differences between people on an orthopedic waiting list (WL) vs people with OA in the community (C). Comparisons included effect size, relative efficiency and receiver operator characteristic curves. RESULTS All instruments detected differences between groups; however no one instrument exhibited superior efficiency. The AQoL demonstrated strong psychometric properties. CONCLUSION The AQoL has equivalent performance to comparator questionnaires commonly used in OA research and would be a useful adjunct to well-established disease specific scales. The AQoL has important advantages; brevity (12 items), facilitates comparisons between disease groups, and delivers a utility score that can be used in health economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Whitfield
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leonie Segal
- Centre for Health Economics Monash, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard H Osborne
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Watson WL, Ozanne-Smith J, Richardsons J. An evaluation of the assessment of quality of life utility instrument as a measure of the impact of injury on health-related quality of life. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2006; 12:227-39. [PMID: 16471155 DOI: 10.1080/17457300500172875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) is a generic health-related quality of life (HRQL) measure. It is the only HRQL instrument, currently available, that incorporates health preference values derived from an Australian population and has been extensively trialled in over 40 studies. However, prior to this study, it had not been used to measure HRQL in injury patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the AQoL, as a measure of the impact of injury on HRQL, by examining its correlation with other commonly used measures of health outcome and its ability to discriminate between groups with injuries of varying type and severity. A total of 221 admitted injury patients, aged 18-74 years, were recruited into the study from four major Victorian metropolitan hospitals and followed up over 12 months. The AQoL and the SF-36 were administered to obtain retrospective measures of pre-injury HRQL and health status with post-injury measurements obtained at five intervals post-injury (to 12 months). A preliminary analysis of data from this study showed the AQoL was positively related to other common outcome measures and, overall, showed a strong correlation with the SF-36 Physical Component Summary and a moderate correlation with the Mental Component Summary. It also demonstrated good discrimination between groups on the basis of type of injury, body region injured and severity of injury. While further testing of the AQoL, in this context, is still necessary, this study suggests that the AQoL may be a useful measure of the impact of injury on HRQL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy L Watson
- Monash University Accident Research Centre, Building 70, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) affects many older people and may result in pain and loss of function in the knee. The article explores the wide spectrum of treatments available, including education, exercise, pharmacological agents and surgery. The evidence for these treatments is examined so that nurses have a knowledge base on which to build their practice. The importance of individual patient characteristics and available resources when deciding on treatment options is emphasized. The article is intended to be of use for both acute and primary care nurses who care for patients with knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Lucas
- Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust, London
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Thorstensson CA, Roos EM, Petersson IF, Ekdahl C. Six-week high-intensity exercise program for middle-aged patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN20244858]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005; 6:27. [PMID: 15924620 PMCID: PMC1187893 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2004] [Accepted: 05/30/2005] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Studies on exercise in knee osteoarthritis (OA) have focused on elderly subjects. Subjects in this study were middle-aged with symptomatic and definite radiographic knee osteoarthritis. The aim was to test the effects of a short-term, high-intensity exercise program on self-reported pain, function and quality of life. Methods Patients aged 36–65, with OA grade III (Kellgren & Lawrence) were recruited. They had been referred for radiographic examination due to knee pain and had no history of major knee injury. They were randomized to a twice weekly supervised one hour exercise intervention for six weeks, or to a non-intervention control group. Exercise was performed at ≥ 60% of maximum heart rate (HR max). The primary outcome measure was the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Follow-up occurred at 6 weeks and 6 months. Results Sixty-one subjects (mean age 56 (SD 6), 51 % women, mean BMI 29.5 (SD 4.8)) were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 30) or control group (n = 31). No significant differences in the KOOS subscales assessing pain, other symptoms, or function in daily life or in sport and recreation were seen at any time point between exercisers and controls. In the exercise group, an improvement was seen at 6 weeks in the KOOS subscale quality of life compared to the control group (mean change 4.0 vs. -0.7, p = 0.05). The difference between groups was still persistent at 6 months (p = 0.02). Conclusion A six-week high-intensive exercise program had no effect on pain or function in middle-aged patients with moderate to severe radiographic knee OA. Some effect was seen on quality of life in the exercise group compared to the control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina A Thorstensson
- Spenshult Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Halmstad, Sweden
- Dept of Rheumatology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ewa M Roos
- Spenshult Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Halmstad, Sweden
- Dept of Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ingemar F Petersson
- Spenshult Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Halmstad, Sweden
- Dept of Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nikles CJ, Yelland M, Del Mar C, Wilkinson D. The role of paracetamol in chronic pain: an evidence-based approach. Am J Ther 2005; 12:80-91. [PMID: 15662295 DOI: 10.1097/00045391-200501000-00011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Chronic pain is a significant public health burden. Several international guidelines and influential reviews recommend the use of paracetamol (acetaminophen) as the first-line analgesic of choice for the management of chronic pain. These recommendations are based largely on the balance of evidence, which favorably demonstrates the efficacy, safety, and low cost of paracetamol relative to other analgesics.A decade ago, March et al suggested that because of the dangers associated with conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory (NSAID) use, particularly in the elderly, they should ideally not be used without an individual n-of-1 trial to show that they are more effective than paracetamol. Today, the results of our investigations into the individualization of pain management options continue to support this suggestion. Based on the data available to date, it still seems prudent to use NSAIDs only in those patients in whom there is good evidence of improved efficacy over paracetamol. In patients with chronic pain, paracetamol can play an important role as an NSAID sparer, with resultant benefits in terms of reduced adverse effects and cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Jane Nikles
- Discipline of General Practice, The University of Queensland, Herston, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ackerman IN, Graves SE, Wicks IP, Bennell KL, Osborne RH. Severely compromised quality of life in women and those of lower socioeconomic status waiting for joint replacement surgery. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005; 53:653-8. [PMID: 16208653 DOI: 10.1002/art.21439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine health-related quality of life (HRQOL), psychological distress, physical function, and self efficacy in persons waiting for lower-limb joint replacement surgery. METHODS A total of 214 patients on a waiting list for unilateral primary total knee or hip replacement at a large Australian public teaching hospital completed questionnaires after entry to the list. HRQOL and psychological distress were compared with available population norms. RESULTS Average HRQOL was extremely poor (mean +/- SD 0.39 +/- 0.24) and much lower (>2 SD) than the population norm. Near death-equivalent HRQOL or worse than death-equivalent HRQOL were reported by 15% of participants. High or very high psychological distress was up to 5 times more prevalent in the waiting list sample (relative risk 5.4 for participants ages 75 years and older; 95% confidence interval 3.3, 9.0). Women had significantly lower HRQOL, self efficacy, and physical function scores than men. After adjusting for age and sex, significant socioeconomic disparities were also found. Participants who received the lowest income had the poorest HRQOL; those with the least education or the lowest income had the highest psychological distress. Low self efficacy was moderately associated with poor HRQOL (r = 0.49, P < 0.001) and more strongly associated with high psychological distress (r = -0.55, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients waiting for joint replacement have very poor HRQOL and high psychological distress, especially women and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Lengthy waiting lists mean patients can experience extended and potentially avoidable morbidity. Interventions to address psychological distress and self efficacy could reduce this burden and should target women and lower socioeconomic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilana N Ackerman
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
|