Evidence-Based Guideline: Treatment of Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children and Adults: Report of the Guideline Committee of the American Epilepsy Society

Challenges of status epilepticus management in a resource-limited setting: A review

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurological condition with significant mortality. Rapid management is essential to minimize the mortality and disability of SE. Two recent trials provided evidence to guide SE management in early and established stages. The Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior To Arrival Trial (RAMPART, 2011) showed that intramuscular midazolam is a better alternative for early convulsive SE in prehospital settings. The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT, 2020) supported the use of sodium valproate and levetiracetam as second-line treatment for its efficacy and shorter administration time. However, there are challenges to revising the status epilepticus management in resource-limited settings, in pre-hospital, first- and second-line treatment, as well as management of refractory and super-refractory SE. These challenges included restrictions or lack of training in the administration of benzodiazepine in the prehospital setting, limited availability and accessibility of newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) in emergency departments and smaller hospitals, and low clinicians' awareness of the latest evidence. A collaborative effort to educate, improve awareness, and make certain ASMs more readily available is recommended to achieve a better clinical outcome in SE.

Morbidity Associated with Deviation from Pediatric Status Epilepticus Guidelines

Treatment guidelines for the management of pediatric status epilepticus (PSE) are often institution-specific. We aim to characterize deviation from our hospital-based PSE treatment guidelines, the total dosage of benzodiazepines administered, and the need for intubation. The study population included all patients with an ICD -10 code for PSE who required admission to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) from April 2019 to April 2022. There were 66 PICU admissions. All patients with concern for PSE and altered mental status are admitted to the PICU. The cohort was divided between those treated according to the PSE protocol (benzodiazepine dose (0.05 mg/kg- 0.2 mg/kg) versus those who had low dose (≤0.05 mg/kg) and high-dose benzodiazepine (> 0.2 mg/kg) totals. The dosage was calculated as the total dose of benzodiazepines received pre-hospital and in the ED before intubation or transport. Forty-one (62 %) of patients received high-dose benzodiazepines (median 0.34 mg/kg [IQR 0.29-0.56], 19 (29 %) received recommended-dose benzodiazepines (median 0.13 mg/kg [IQR 0.09,0.15] and 6 (9 %) received low-dose (median 0.05 mg/kg [IQR 0.03,0.05]. The high-dose group was 15.9 (95 % CI = 3.7, 99.9) times more likely to be intubated controlling for the location of care (tertiary versus community hospital), and the age of the patient. The recommended-dose and low-dose groups required intubation with much less frequency.

Enolase inhibitors as therapeutic leads for Naegleria fowleri infection

Infections with the pathogenic free-living amoebae Naegleria fowleri can lead to life-threatening illnesses including catastrophic primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM). Efficacious treatment options for these infections are lacking and the mortality rate remains >95% in the US. Glycolysis is very important for the infectious trophozoite lifecycle stage and inhibitors of glucose metabolism have been found to be toxic to the pathogen. Recently, human enolase 2 (ENO2) phosphonate inhibitors have been developed as lead agents to treat glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). These compounds, which cure GBM in a rodent model, are well-tolerated in mammals because enolase 1 (ENO1) is the predominant isoform used systemically. Here, we describe findings that demonstrate these agents are potent inhibitors of N. fowleri ENO (NfENO) and are lethal to amoebae. In particular, (1-hydroxy-2-oxopiperidin-3-yl) phosphonic acid (HEX) was a potent enzyme inhibitor (IC50 = 0.14 ± 0.04 μM) that was toxic to trophozoites (EC50 = 0.21 ± 0.02 μM) while the reported CC50 was >300 μM. Molecular docking simulation revealed that HEX binds strongly to the active site of NfENO with a binding affinity of -8.6 kcal/mol. Metabolomic studies of parasites treated with HEX revealed a 4.5 to 78-fold accumulation of glycolytic intermediates upstream of NfENO. Last, nasal instillation of HEX increased longevity of amoebae-infected rodents. Two days after infection, animals were treated for 10 days with 3 mg/kg HEX, followed by one week of observation. At the end of the one-week observation, eight of 12 HEX-treated animals remained alive (resulting in an indeterminable median survival time) while one of 12 vehicle-treated rodents remained, yielding a median survival time of 10.9 days. However, intranasal HEX delivery was not curative as brains of six of the eight survivors were positive for amoebae. These findings suggest that HEX requires further evaluation to develop as a lead for treatment of PAM.

Efficacy of second-line anticonvulsant agents with adult status epilepticus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) is potentially life-threatening, however, it is unclear which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be used as second-line AEDs.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing multiple second-line AEDs for SE to investigate the efficacy of AEDs.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal and included RCTs for patients aged ≥15 years with SE on December 31, 2023. We compared multiple second-line AEDs for SE including fosphenytoin (fPHT), lacosamide (LCM), levetiracetam (LEV), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PHB), and valproate (VPA). The primary and secondly outcomes were termination of seizures integrating the absence of seizure recurrence at 30 min and 60 min, and adverse events associated with AEDs, respectively, with expressing as relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We conducted a NMA using frequentist-based approach with multivariate random effects, and assessed the certainty based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs (n = 780) were included, and statistically significant difference was detected between VPA vs. PHB (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.85; very low certainty), fPHT vs. PHB (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90; very low certainty), LCM vs. PHB (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.93; very low certainty), and LEV vs. PHB (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.94; very low certainty). Moreover, PHB was the highest in the ranking for termination of seizures. For adverse events, no significant reduction was observed owing to the selection of AEDs, although the ranking of PHB was the lowest.

CONCLUSIONS

PHB may have been the most effective for seizure termination as second-line AEDs in adult patients with SE. However, the certainty of almost all comparisons was "very low", and careful interpretation is essential.

Relative Bioavailability Study of Midazolam Intramuscularly Administered with the Needle-Free Auto-Injector ZENEO® in Healthy Adults

INTRODUCTION

Intramuscular (IM) midazolam is indicated for the treatment of status epilepticus. Administration must be efficient to rapidly terminate prolonged seizures and prevent complications. The objective of this study was to compare, in terms of relative bioavailability and bioequivalence, IM midazolam injection by needle-free auto-injector, in different settings, to IM midazolam injection by a conventional syringe and needle.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, four-period crossover study, healthy adults received single doses of midazolam (10 mg) under fasting conditions. The reference treatment (conventional syringe) was administered once, on bare skin in the thigh. The tested treatment (the needle-free auto-injector ZENEO®) was administered three times: on bare skin in the thigh, on bare skin in the ventrogluteal area, and through clothing in the thigh. Repeated plasma samples were collected to obtain 36-h pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles. Primary PK parameters were area under the plasma concentration-time curve, from time zero to the last measurable time point (AUC0-t) and from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), and the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax).

RESULTS

Forty adults were enrolled and included in the PK analysis set. In all comparisons, the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the least-squares geometric mean ratios for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were within the bioequivalence range of 80-125%, with low intra-individual coefficients of variation (< 20.5% for all parameters in all comparisons). Bioequivalence was also met for Cmax in all comparisons except when comparing the tested treatment through clothing versus the reference treatment, where the 90% CI lower limit was slightly outside the bioequivalence range (78.8%). With all tested treatments Cmax was slightly lower, but early mean plasma concentrations (first 10 min post-dosing) were higher when compared to the reference treatment. In general, all treatments were well tolerated, with maximum sedation 0.5-1 h post-injection.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

This study establishes that IM midazolam injection on bare skin in the thigh with the ZENEO® is bioequivalent to IM midazolam injection with a syringe and needle. An acceptable relative bioavailability, compatible with emergency practice, was also shown in multiple settings. Higher mean concentrations within the first 10 min with the ZENEO® device, and quicker two-step injection suggest a faster onset of action, and thereby an earlier seizure termination, thus preventing the occurrence of prolonged seizure and neurological complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05026567. Registration first posted August 30, 2021, first patient enrolled May 9, 2022.

Adapting Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines for Emergency Management of Seizures in Children Beyond the Neonatal Period

BACKGROUND

The presented evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) is proposed as a National CPG where we adapted the international recommendations for the emergency management of seizures in children beyond the neonatal period to suit the health care in Egypt. The quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations are indicated. This study aimed to standardize the treatment of acute epileptic seizures and to provide an easy-to-apply acute treatment protocol that will allow immediate and appropriate seizure control.

METHODS

This is part of a larger program by the Egyptian Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee (EPG) in collaboration with the staff of pediatric departments of 15 Egyptian universities and the National Research Centre. EPG was affiliated later to the Supreme Council of the Egyptian University Hospitals aiming to define the topics of, assign authors to, and assist in the adaptation of pediatric evidence-based CPGs according to a national strategic plan (http://epg.edu.eg). The committee is guided by a formal CPG adaptation methodology: the "Adapted ADAPTE."

RESULTS

The Egyptian Childhood Seizure Group (ECSG) reviewed the results of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II assessment and decided to adapt the recommendations of three source CPGs: American Epilepsy Society, Italian League Against Epilepsy, Neurocritical Care Society, and Neurologic & Psychiatric Society of Zambia. Eight implementation tools were included. A comprehensive set of multifaceted CPG implementation strategies was provided for the clinicians, patients, nurses, and other relevant stakeholders contextualized to the national settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience with this adaptation methodology provides useful insight into its national utilization in Egypt.

Efficacy of intravenous clonazepam for paediatric convulsive status epilepticus

AIM

To compare the efficacy of intravenous clonazepam (CLZ) for the initial management of convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) in children as a function of the first-line in-hospital dose used.

METHOD

This monocentric retrospective study included children who received a first dose of CLZ for CSE at Montpellier University Hospital, France, between January 2016 and June 2019. Data from medical records (clinical, treatment, course) were collected and compared as a function of the first CLZ dose used.

RESULTS

Among the 310 children treated for CSE, 105 received at least one CLZ dose (median age 3 years; quartile 1-quartile 3 [Q1-Q3] = 1 years 2 months-6 years 6 months). Among these 105 patients, 24 (22%) received a dose less than 0.03 mg/kg (low dose) and 69 (65%) received a dose of at least 0.03 mg/kg (high dose). Seizure cessation rate was not different between the low- and high-dose groups (62.5% vs 76%; odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-1.44, p = 0.29). The administration of a second dose of CLZ was more frequent in the low- than the high-dose group (37.5% vs 16%; odds ratio 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-9.1, p = 0.04).

INTERPRETATION

Our study did not find any difference in seizure termination rate as a function of CLZ dose in children with CSE. However, a second CLZ dose was more frequently needed in the group receiving low (less than 0.03 mg/kg) CLZ.

Evaluation of the Use of Ketamine in Prehospital Seizure Management: A Retrospective Review of the ESO Database

OBJECTIVES

Benzodiazepines are the primary antiseizure medication used by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for seizures. Available literature in the United States and internationally shows 30% to 40% of seizures do not terminate with benzodiazepines called benzodiazepine refractory status epilepticus (BRSE). Ketamine is a potential treatment for BRSE due to its unique pharmacology. However, its application in the prehospital setting is mostly documented in case reports. Little is known about its use by EMS professionals for seizure management, whether as initial treatment or for BRSE, creating an opportunity to describe its current use and inform future research.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 9-1-1 EMS encounters with a primary or secondary impression of seizure using the ESO Data Collaborative from 2018 to 2021. We isolated encounters during which ketamine was administered. We excluded medication administrations prior to EMS arrival and encounters without medication administration. Subgroup analysis was performed to control for airway procedure as an indication for ketamine administration. We also evaluated for co-administration with other antiseizure medications, dose and route of administration, and response to treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 99,576 encounters that met inclusion. There were 2,531/99,576 (2.54%) encounters with ketamine administration and 50.7% (1,283/2,531) received ketamine without an airway procedure. There were 616 cases (48%, 616/1,283) where ketamine was given without another antiseizure medication (ASM) and without any airway procedure. The remaining 667 (52%) cases received ketamine with at least one other ASM, most commonly midazolam (89%, 593/667). Adjusted for the growth in the ESO dataset, ketamine use by EMS professionals during encounters for seizures without an airway procedure increased from 0.90% (139/15,375) to 1.45% (416/28,651) an increase of 62% over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective review of the ESO Data Collaborative, ketamine administration for seizure encounters without an airway procedure increased over the study period, both as a single agent and with another ASM. Most ketamine administrations were for adult patients in the south and in urban areas. The frequency of BRSE, the need for effective treatment, and the growth in ketamine use warrant prospective prehospital research to evaluate the value of ketamine in prehospital seizure management.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Loading Dose Optimization of Intravenous Valproic Acid in Hospitalized Thai Patients

Our goal is to create a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and identify the best loading dose (LD) of intravenous valproic acid for hospitalized Thai patients. Data from patients who received intravenous valproic acid and underwent measurement of serum valproic acid concentrations during hospitalization were collected retrospectively. A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach was conducted to estimate the PK parameters of valproic acid. Covariates affecting the PK parameters of valproic acid were examined and ranked based on their impact on the model's performance. Monte Carlo simulations of 1000 patients were conducted to estimate the optimal LD of valproic acid. A total of 120 hospitalized patients (51.7% male) with 167 valproic acid concentrations were included in the study. A linear one-compartment model with constant residual error was the best base model. An age-covariate model was the best predictor of valproic acid clearance (CL). The typical values of CL and volume of distribution for valproic acid were 0.77 L/h and 14.56 L, respectively. The LD of 1000-1200 mg intravenous was identified as the pragmatic option as an empirical regimen for hospitalized Thai patients. The recommended time to initiate maintenance dose (MD) is 4-8 h following the LD. The population PK model and optimal LD of valproic acid in hospitalized Thai patients has been established, and it may be advisable to initiate the MD at a later time for the elderly.

Levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A case report

This case report describes the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in a critically ill patient supported on venovenous membrane oxygenation. While levetiracetam has emerged as a first line option to treat seizures in critically ill patients, there is limited information available regarding the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on the pharmacokinetics of this medication. This report contributes to the limited body of literature describing the pharmacokinetics of medications in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Utility and rationale for continuous EEG monitoring: a primer for the general intensivist

This review offers a comprehensive guide for general intensivists on the utility of continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring for critically ill patients. Beyond the primary role of EEG in detecting seizures, this review explores its utility in neuroprognostication, monitoring neurological deterioration, assessing treatment responses, and aiding rehabilitation in patients with encephalopathy, coma, or other consciousness disorders. Most seizures and status epilepticus (SE) events in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting are nonconvulsive or subtle, making cEEG essential for identifying these otherwise silent events. Imaging and invasive approaches can add to the diagnosis of seizures for specific populations, given that scalp electrodes may fail to identify seizures that may be detected by depth electrodes or electroradiologic findings. When cEEG identifies SE, the risk of secondary neuronal injury related to the time-intensity "burden" often prompts treatment with anti-seizure medications. Similarly, treatment may be administered for seizure-spectrum activity, such as periodic discharges or lateralized rhythmic delta slowing on the ictal-interictal continuum (IIC), even when frank seizures are not evident on the scalp. In this setting, cEEG is utilized empirically to monitor treatment response. Separately, cEEG has other versatile uses for neurotelemetry, including identifying the level of sedation or consciousness. Specific conditions such as sepsis, traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and cardiac arrest may each be associated with a unique application of cEEG; for example, predicting impending events of delayed cerebral ischemia, a feared complication in the first two weeks after subarachnoid hemorrhage. After brief training, non-neurophysiologists can learn to interpret quantitative EEG trends that summarize elements of EEG activity, enhancing clinical responsiveness in collaboration with clinical neurophysiologists. Intensivists and other healthcare professionals also play crucial roles in facilitating timely cEEG setup, preventing electrode-related skin injuries, and maintaining patient mobility during monitoring.

Sublingual and buccal drug administration in medical emergencies

Drug administration is crucial to achieve effective therapeutic drug outcomes. In medical emergencies, it is particularly convenient to use drugs that could be administered as an alternative to traditional routes (as oral or intravenous routes), that are not always suitable in these situations. Thus, sublingual and buccal routes offer an alternative to traditional routes, when a rapid onset of action is required. The main objective of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence for the use of sublingual and buccal drug administration in medical emergencies. The evidence obtained has been divided into four common scenarios found in the emergency department and intensive care units: cardiovascular emergencies, acute pain, agitation, and epileptic status. Moreover, the main advantages and disadvantages of sublingual and buccal routes are presented, as the future perspectives in the drug delivery field to overcome the limitations of these routes.

Improving Quality of Care for Status Epilepticus: Putting Protocols into Practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Timely treatment of status epilepticus (SE) improves outcomes, however gaps between recommended and implemented care are common. This review analyzes obstacles and explores interventions to optimize effective, evidence-based treatment of SE.

RECENT FINDINGS

Seizure action plans, rescue medications, and noninvasive wearables with seizure detection capabilities can facilitate early intervention for prolonged seizures in the home and school. In the field, standardized EMS protocols, EMS education, and screening tools can address variability in SE definitions and treatment, particularly benzodiazepine dosing. In the emergency room and hospital, provider education, SE order sets and alerts, and rapid EEG technologies, can shorten time to first-line therapy, second-line therapy, and EEG initiation. Widespread, sustained improvement in SE care remains challenging. A multipronged approach including emphasis on pre-hospital intervention, treatment protocols adapted to local contexts, and SE databases to systematically collect process and outcome metrics have the potential to transform SE treatment and outcomes.

Survey of Pediatric ICU EEG Monitoring-Reassessment After a Decade

PURPOSE

In 2011, the authors conducted a survey regarding continuous EEG (CEEG) utilization in critically ill children. In the interim decade, the literature has expanded, and guidelines and consensus statements have addressed CEEG utilization. Thus, the authors aimed to characterize current practice related to CEEG utilization in critically ill children.

METHODS

The authors conducted an online survey of pediatric neurologists from 50 US and 12 Canadian institutions in 2022.

RESULTS

The authors assessed responses from 48 of 62 (77%) surveyed institutions. Reported CEEG indications were consistent with consensus statement recommendations and included altered mental status after a seizure or status epilepticus, altered mental status of unknown etiology, or altered mental status with an acute primary neurological condition. Since the prior survey, there was a 3- to 4-fold increase in the number of patients undergoing CEEG per month and greater use of written pathways for ICU CEEG. However, variability in resources and workflow persisted, particularly regarding technologist availability, frequency of CEEG screening, communication approaches, and electrographic seizure management approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the surveyed institutions, which included primarily large academic centers, CEEG use in pediatric intensive care units has increased with some practice standardization, but variability in resources and workflow were persistent.

Emergency Medicine Case Study on Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity

The purpose of this case study on local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), a potentially life-threatening complication of local anesthetic, is to ensure that emergency nurse practitioners (ENPs) are knowledgeable on this disease process. Local anesthetics are used frequently, often daily, by ENPs, as well as multiple other health care providers for various procedures. They should be knowledgeable of the steps to resuscitate a patient who may have severe LAST. This case study reviews the emergency management of LAST, including pharmacologic treatment, deviations from routine advanced resuscitative guidelines, and disposition of the patient upon successful resuscitation. Additionally, risk assessment and clinical manifestations will be discussed. After reviewing this case study, ENPs should be able to recognize the presentation of LAST and provide emergent management to reduce complications, comorbidities, and death.

Investigating Associations Between Nonadherence to Guideline-Recommended Treatment of Pediatric Seizures and Adverse Outcomes: A Canadian Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that nonadherence to treatment guidelines for seizures may affect patient outcomes. We examined the feasibility of conducting a larger investigation to test this hypothesis in the pediatric population.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients aged ≤18 years who presented with seizure to the emergency departments of two Ontario hospitals in 2019 to 2021. Patients were grouped by seizure duration (<5 minutes [n = 37], ≥5 minutes [n = 41]). We examined nonadherence to guideline-recommended treatment, adverse outcomes (hospitalization, length of stay, respiratory complications), and missing values for key variables.

RESULTS

Of 78 patients, 34 (44%) did not receive guideline-recommended treatment. Nonadherence was similar in the two groups (<5 minutes: 46%; ≥5 minutes: 41%). Common deviations included administering an antiseizure medication (ASM) for seizures of less than five minutes (46%), a delay (>10 minutes) between the first and second ASM doses (50%), and use of a benzodiazepine for the third dose (45%). Hospitalizations were common in both seizure duration groups (∼90%), whereas respiratory complications were relatively rare. Time of seizure onset was missing in 51% of charts, and none contained the time of first contact with emergency services when patients were transported by ambulance.

CONCLUSION

We found evidence of substantial nonadherence to guideline-recommended treatment of pediatric seizures. Medical records do not contain sufficient information to comprehensively investigate this issue. A multicenter prospective study is the most feasible option to examine the association between nonadherence to guideline-recommended treatment and patient outcomes.

Use of perampanel oral suspension for the treatment of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus

INTRODUCTION

Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical emergency associated with a significant risk of disability and death. The treatment of SE follows a step-wise approach, with limited data on ideal antiseizure medications (ASMs) for refractory and super refractory SE (RSE/SRSE). Perampanel (PER), an AMPA receptor antagonist, has shown promise in animal models but still has limited data in humans. This study tried to evaluate optimal dosage and safety of PER in RSE and SRSE patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 17 adult patients with RSE (1) or SRSE (16) treated with PER. Demographic and clinical data, including EEG patterns, ASMs administered, PER dosages, and PER plasma concentrations, were collected. For patients receiving a 24 mg PER loading dose (full dose group), the following treatment regimen was applied: 24 mg per day for 48 h following by 16 mg per day. The response to PER was assessed based on electroencephalographic (EEG) improvement from high to low epileptiform activity or from low to the absence of epileptiform activities. Safety was evaluated monitoring hepatic and renal function.

RESULTS

A response rate of 58.82 % was observed, with significantly higher responses in the full dose group (81.82 %) compared to those receiving PER doses below 24 mg (low dose group) (16.67 %) (p-value = 0.004; OR 0.044, 95 % CI 0.003 to 0.621, p = 0.021). No other clinical factors significantly influenced treatment response. Hepatic enzymes become elevated in most patients (70.59 %) but spontaneously decreased.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that a 24 mg PER dose administered for 48 h may be more effective in managing RSE and SRSE compared to doses below 24 mg, potentially due to pharmacokinetic factors.

CONCLUSION

More robust data on PER in RSE and SRSE, including standardized dosing procedures and plasma level monitoring are needed. PER's potential benefits should be explored further, particularly in patients with RSE and SRSE.

Nurses' Understanding and Practice of Minimal Stimulation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients receiving neurologic and neurosurgical critical care undergo many procedures that result in stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, which increases their risk of poor outcomes. Nurses typically implement a variety of interventions to minimize such stimulation; however, minimal stimulation has not been specifically defined in the literature or described as a standardized bundle of care.

OBJECTIVE

To examine pediatric intensive care unit nurses' interpretation and practice of minimal stimulation in patients with neurologic and neurosurgical conditions and specifically to triangulate nurses' descriptions of this practice with related findings in the literature.

METHODS

This was a qualitative, descriptive, exploratory study that used naturalistic inquiry.

RESULTS

A total of 13 pediatric intensive care unit nurses participated in the study. Three primary themes were identified regarding minimal stimulation: (1) new knowledge and practice, (2) communication, and (3) impact of minimal stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study help to establish a working definition of the nursing practice of minimal stimulation and provide a basis for future research. More detailed study is needed on the concept of a standardized minimal stimulation bundle and its impact on patient outcomes.

Perampanel as an Add-On Therapy in Patients with Refractory Status Epilepticus and Postanoxic Encephalopathy: A Real-Life Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Data on the efficacy of perampanel in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and postanoxic encephalopathy (PAE) are limited; its use in such conditions is currently off-label.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with RSE, including PAE, exhibiting electroencephalographic patterns indicative of status epilepticus who were treated at our center (January 2018 to December 2022) with assessment of clinical and electroencephalographic outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included in the study, of whom 29 had nonanoxic RSE and 7 had PAE. Within the nonanoxic RSE subgroup, 45% (13 of 29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 27-63%) of study participants were responders, 34% (10 of 29; 95% CI 17-52%) were partial responders, and 21% (6 of 29; 95% CI 6-35%) were nonresponders. In the PAE subgroup (n = 7), no patients fully responded to perampanel; 43% (3 of 7; 95% CI 6-80%) were partial responders, and 57% (4 of 7; 95% CI 20-95%) were nonresponders. Responder and nonresponder study participants exhibited overlapping baseline characteristics. No significant differences in duration of hospitalization were observed between responders and nonresponders in both subgroups. Responders in the RSE subgroup had a median discharge modified Rankin Scale score of 3 (interquartile range 3-4), and nonresponders had a median discharge modified Rankin Scale score of 5 (interquartile range 5-6).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limitations from the retrospective design and the small population size, this study suggests that perampanel use in nonanoxic RSE appears to yield promising results at moderate doses, including a tendency toward a better functional outcome at discharge, without significant adverse effects. However, in patients with PAE, the drug seems to show suboptimal performance. Perampanel appears to have promising efficacy as an add-on therapy in nonanoxic RSE. However, in patients with PAE, its efficacy seems to be lower. Further studies are warranted to confirm these observations.

Identification of etiologies according to baseline clinical features of pediatric new-onset refractory status epilepticus in single center retrospective study

PURPOSE

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is defined as a state of prolonged seizure activity that does not improve despite the appropriate administration of medications, with underlying causes unknown after the initial diagnosis of status epilepticus. Because episodes of NORSE are accompanied by severe complications and a high risk of mortality, the prompt identification of the underlying cause is crucial for effective treatment and outcome prediction. This study assessed the relationship of NORSE etiologies with baseline clinical features in pediatric population.

METHODS

Seventy-one pediatric patients, under 18 years of age at the initial diagnosis (4.50 ± 4.04, mean ± standard deviation), who experienced at least one episode of NORSE and underwent a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation between January 2005 and June 2020 at our center, were retrospectively selected. We reviewed clinical features at disease onset and long-term follow-up data. Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) was used to distinguish etiological clusters according to baseline clinical characteristics, and further analysis was performed based on underlying etiologies.

RESULTS

Two distinct etiological groups-genetic and non-genetic-were identified based on the UMAP of clinical characteristics. Dravet syndrome (12/15, 80%) was more predominant in patients with a genetic diagnosis, whereas cryptogenic NORSE and encephalitis were prevalent in patients without a genetic diagnosis. The analysis of etiological categories revealed that age at the onset of status epilepticus (P=0.021) and progression to super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) (P=0.038) were independently associated with differences in etiologies.

CONCLUSION

Several clinical features in patients with NORSE, including the age of onset and the development of SRSE, can help identify underlying causes, which necessitate prompt and adequate treatment.

Comparative analysis of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and propofol impact on epilepsy-related mortality in the ICU: insights from the MIMIC-IV database

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine (Dex), midazolam, and propofol are three distinct sedatives characterized by varying pharmacological properties. Previous literature has indicated the positive impact of each of these sedatives on ICU patients. However, there is a scarcity of clinical evidence comparing the efficacy of Dex, midazolam, and propofol in reducing mortality among people with epilepsy (PWE). This study aimed to assess the impact of Dex, midazolam, and propofol on the survival of PWE.

METHODS

The data were retrospectively retrieved from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database (version 2.0). PWE were categorized into Dex, midazolam, and propofol groups based on the intravenously administered sedatives. PWE without standard drug therapy were included in the control group. Comparative analyses were performed on the data among the groups.

RESULTS

The Dex group exhibited a significantly lower proportion of in-hospital deaths and a markedly higher in-hospital survival time compared to the midazolam and propofol groups (p < 0.01) after propensity score matching. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a significant improvement in survival rates for the Dex group compared to the control group (p = 0.025). Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) revealed no significant differences in survival rates among the Dex, midazolam, and propofol groups (F = 1.949, p = 0.143). The nomogram indicated that compared to midazolam and propofol groups, Dex was more effective in improving the survival rate of PWE.

CONCLUSION

Dex might improve the survival rate of PWE in the ICU compared to no standard drug intervention. However, Dex did not exhibit superiority in improving survival rates compared to midazolam and propofol.

Seizure recurrences in generalized convulsive status epilepticus under sedation: What are its predictors and its impact on outcome?

BACKGROUND

Management of status epilepticus (SE) is focused on the early seizure termination. Refractory SE is an indication for sedation in patients with SE, but up to 75% of patients may be ventilated due to a neurological or respiratory failure. In patients requiring sedation, the clinical assessment is not sufficient to assess seizure control. Identifying those at risk of recurrent seizures could be useful to adapt their management. On the other hand, patients with low risk could benefit from an early withdrawal of sedation to avoid the impact of inappropriate sedation on outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence and the predictors of uncontrolled SE and its impact on outcome in patients with generalized convulsive SE (GCSE) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV).

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients admitted to the intensive care unit with GCSE requiring MV. Uncontrolled SE was defined as persistent or recurrent seizures during sedation or within 24hours following withdrawal. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the associated factors.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled SE occurred in 37 out of 220 patients (17%). Persistent seizures at admission, higher SAPS II and central nervous system infection were associated with a higher risk of uncontrolled SE. Acute toxic or metabolic etiologies were associated with a decreased risk of uncontrolled SE. In a supplementary analysis, decrease of albumin blood levels was associated with uncontrolled SE. Uncontrolled SE was associated with a poor functional outcome and mortality at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Seventeen percent of patients with a GCSE requiring MV suffered from uncontrolled SE. Etiology and persistent seizures at admission were the main predictors of uncontrolled SE. Patients with uncontrolled SE had a longer duration of sedation and MV, a poor functional outcome and a higher mortality. Further studies are required to determine the impact of continuous electroencephalogram monitoring on the clinical course.

A retrospective study of CT scan utilization in the emergency department for patients presenting with seizures

BACKGROUND/AIM

The indications for neuroimaging in emergency department (ED) patients presenting with seizures have not been clearly defined. In this study, we aimed to investigate the findings that may influence the emergency management of patients with seizures undergoing brain computed tomography (CT) and the factors that influence these findings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center study. Patients presenting to the ED with seizures-both patients with diagnosed epilepsy and patients with first-time seizures-who underwent brain CT were included. Demographic information and indications for CT scans were recorded. According to the CT findings, patients were classified as having or not having significant pathology, and comparisons were made. Intracranial mass, intraparenchymal, subdural, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, fracture, and cerebral edema were considered significant pathologies.

RESULTS

This study included 404 patients. The most common reason for a CT scan was head trauma. A significant pathology was found on the CT scan in 5.4% of the patients. A regression analysis showed that hypertension, malignancy, and a prolonged postictal state were the predictive factors for significant pathology on CT.

CONCLUSION

CT scanning of patients presenting to the ED with seizures has a limited impact on emergency patient management. Clinical decision-making guidelines for emergency CT scanning of patients with seizures need to be reviewed and improved to identify zero/near-zero risk patients for whom imaging can be deferred.

Ketamine to Prevent Endotracheal Intubation in Adults with Refractory Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is defined as status epilepticus (SE) with no obvious motor phenomenon and is diagnosed based on electroencephalogram (EEG). Refractory SE (RSE) is the persistence of seizures despite treatment with an adequately dosed first-line and second-line agents. Although guidelines for convulsive RSE include third-line agents such as intravenous anesthetic drugs (midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates), the therapeutic approach to NCSE is not well outlined. Treatment with traditional anesthetics invariably includes endotracheal intubation, which is associated with significant adverse events. Comparatively, ketamine, a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist is not associated with significant cardiorespiratory depression and may help in avoiding intubation.

OBJECTIVE

In this case series, we describe our experience with the early use of intravenous ketamine as the first anesthetic agent in patients with refractory NCSE to avoid endotracheal intubation.

METHODS

We present a case series of nine patients managed in the Neurointensive Care Unit at a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. The study was approved by the hospital and university institutional review boards and the requirement for informed consent was waived for retrospective analysis of existing data, per institutional policy. All cases of SE were identified from a prospective database, and a subsequent retrospective chart review identified all patients with a diagnosis of refractory NCSE in whom ketamine was used as the first anesthetic agent. The primary endpoint was the avoidance of endotracheal intubation while on ketamine infusion. The secondary endpoint was defined as cessation of both clinical and electrographic seizures recorded on continuous EEG within 24 h of ketamine administration.

RESULTS

A total of nine patients experiencing refractory NCSE were included in this case series, with a median age of 61 (range 26-72) years and seven patients were male. The primary endpoint, avoiding intubation, was achieved in five out of nine (55%) cases. Six patients experienced resolution of refractory NCSE with ketamine administration as the sole anesthetic agent. Four patients required endotracheal intubation and three patients had a failure of seizure cessation with ketamine. Hypersalivation and pneumonia were the most common ketamine associated adverse events. In non-intubated patients, no deaths occurred. One patient was discharged home, four to subacute rehabilitation, one to a long term acute care hospital, and one patient to hospice.

CONCLUSION

The use of ketamine as the primary anesthetic agent may be a reasonable option to avoid endotracheal intubation in a subset of patients with refractory NCSE. This study is limited by its small sample size, retrospective design, and reliance on information obtained from chart review.

Emergent Management of Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

Status epilepticus is a neurologic emergency that can be life- threatening. The key to effective management is recognition and prompt initiation of treatment. Management of status epilepticus requires a patient-specific-approach framework, consisting of four axes: (1) semiology, (2) etiology, (3) EEG correlate, and (4) age. This article provides a comprehensive overview of status epilepticus, highlighting the current treatment approaches and strategies for management and control.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Administering appropriate doses of antiseizure medication in a timely manner is vital for halting seizure activity. Benzodiazepines are the first-line treatment, as demonstrated by three randomized controlled trials in the hospital and prehospital settings. Benzodiazepines can be administered through IV, intramuscular, rectal, or intranasal routes. If seizures persist, second-line treatments such as phenytoin and fosphenytoin, valproate, or levetiracetam are warranted. The recently published Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial found that all three of these drugs are similarly effective in achieving seizure cessation in approximately half of patients. For cases of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus, IV anesthetics, including ketamine and γ-aminobutyric acid-mediated (GABA-ergic) medications, are necessary. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the use of ketamine, not only in the early phases of stage 3 status epilepticus but also as a second-line treatment option.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

As with other neurologic emergencies, "time is brain" when treating status epilepticus. Antiseizure medication should be initiated quickly to achieve seizure cessation. There is a need to explore newer generations of antiseizure medications and nonpharmacologic modalities to treat status epilepticus.

Update in Pediatric Neurocritical Care: What a Neurologist Caring for Critically Ill Children Needs to Know

Currently nearly one-quarter of admissions to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) worldwide are for neurocritical care diagnoses that are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pediatric neurocritical care is a rapidly evolving field with unique challenges due to not only age-related responses to primary neurologic insults and their treatments but also the rarity of pediatric neurocritical care conditions at any given institution. The structure of pediatric neurocritical care services therefore is most commonly a collaborative model where critical care medicine physicians coordinate care and are supported by a multidisciplinary team of pediatric subspecialists, including neurologists. While pediatric neurocritical care lies at the intersection between critical care and the neurosciences, this narrative review focuses on the most common clinical scenarios encountered by pediatric neurologists as consultants in the PICU and synthesizes the recent evidence, best practices, and ongoing research in these cases. We provide an in-depth review of (1) the evaluation and management of abnormal movements (seizures/status epilepticus and status dystonicus); (2) acute weakness and paralysis (focusing on pediatric stroke and select pediatric neuroimmune conditions); (3) neuromonitoring modalities using a pathophysiology-driven approach; (4) neuroprotective strategies for which there is evidence (e.g., pediatric severe traumatic brain injury, post-cardiac arrest care, and ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke); and (5) best practices for neuroprognostication in pediatric traumatic brain injury, cardiac arrest, and disorders of consciousness, with highlights of the 2023 updates on Brain Death/Death by Neurological Criteria. Our review of the current state of pediatric neurocritical care from the viewpoint of what a pediatric neurologist in the PICU needs to know is intended to improve knowledge for providers at the bedside with the goal of better patient care and outcomes.

Status epilepticus in Auckland, New Zealand: Treatment patterns and determinants of outcome in a prospective population-based cohort

OBJECTIVE

Determination of the real-world performance of a health care system in the treatment of status epilepticus (SE).

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter population-based study of SE in Auckland, New Zealand (NZ) over 1 year, with data recorded in the EpiNet database. Focus on treatment patterns and determinants of SE duration and 30-day mortality. The incidence, etiology, ethnic discrepancies, and seizure characteristics of this cohort have been published previously.

RESULTS

A total of 365 patients were included in this treatment cohort; 326 patients (89.3%) were brought to hospital because of SE, whereas 39 patients (10.7%) developed SE during a hospital admission for another reason. Overall, 190 (52.1%) had a known history of epilepsy and 254 (70.0%) presented with SE with prominent motor activity. The mean Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) was 2.15 and the mean SE duration of all patients was 44 min. SE self-terminated without any treatment in 84 patients (22.7%). Earlier administration of appropriately dosed benzodiazepine in the pre-hospital setting was a major determinant of SE duration. Univariate analysis demonstrated that mortality was significantly higher in older patients, patients with longer durations of SE, higher STESS, and patients who developed SE in hospital, but these did not maintain significance with multivariate analysis. There was no difference in the performance of the health care system in the treatment of SE across ethnic groups.

SIGNIFICANCE

When SE was defined as 10 continuous minutes of seizure, overall mortality was lower than expected and many patients had self-limited presentations for which no treatment was required. Although there were disparities in the incidence of SE across ethnic groups there was no difference in treatment or outcome. The finding highlights the benefit of a health care system designed to deliver universal health care.

Status Epilepticus: An Update on Pharmacological Management

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency that requires timely pharmacological therapy to cease seizure activity. The treatment approach varies based on the time and the treatment stage of SE. Benzodiazepines are considered the first-line therapy during the emergent treatment phase of SE. Antiseizure medicines such as phenytoin, valproic acid, and levetiracetam are recommended during the urgent treatment phase. These drugs appear to have a similar safety and efficacy profile, and individualized therapy should be chosen based on patient characteristics. Midazolam, propofol, pentobarbital, and ketamine are continuous intravenous infusions of anesthetic medications utilized in the refractory SE (RSE) period. The most efficacious pharmacotherapeutic treatments for RSE and superrefractory status epilepticus are not clearly defined.

The influence of biological rhythms on the initial onset of status epilepticus in critically ill inpatients and the study of its predictive Model

This study aims to explore the relationship between the circadian rhythms of critically ill patients and the incidence of Status Epilepticus (SE), and to develop a predictive model based on circadian rhythm indicators and clinical factors. We conducted a diurnal rhythm analysis of vital sign data from 4413 patients, discovering significant differences in the circadian rhythms of body temperature, blood oxygen saturation, and heart rate between the SE and non-SE groups, which were correlated with the incidence of SE. We also employed various machine learning algorithms to identify the ten most significant variables and developed a predictive model with strong performance and clinical applicability. Our research provides a new perspective and methodology for the study of biological rhythms in critically ill patients, offering new evidence and tools for the prevention and treatment of SE. Our findings are consistent or similar to some in the literature, while differing from or supplementing others. We observed significant differences in the vital signs of epileptic patients at different times of the day across various diagnostic time groups, reflecting the regulatory effects of circadian rhythms. We suggest heightened monitoring and intervention of vital signs in critically ill patients, especially during late night to early morning hours, to reduce the risk of SE and provide more personalized treatment plans.

A Comparison of Ketamine and Midazolam as First-Line Anesthetic Infusions for Pediatric Status Epilepticus

BACKGROUND

Pediatric refractory status epilepticus (RSE) often requires management with anesthetic infusions, but few data compare first-line anesthetics. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of midazolam and ketamine infusions as first-line anesthetics for pediatric RSE.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center study of consecutive study participants treated with ketamine or midazolam as the first-line anesthetic infusions for RSE at a quaternary care children's hospital from December 1, 2017, until September 15, 2021.

RESULTS

We identified 117 study participants (28 neonates), including 79 (68%) who received midazolam and 38 (32%) who received ketamine as the first-line anesthetic infusions. Seizures terminated more often in study participants administered ketamine (61%, 23/38) than midazolam (28%, 22/79; odds ratio [OR] 3.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.76-8.98; P < 0.01). Adverse effects occurred more often in study participants administered midazolam (24%, 20/79) than ketamine (3%, 1/38; OR 12.54, 95% CI 1.61-97.43; P = 0.016). Study participants administered ketamine were younger, ketamine was used more often for children with acute symptomatic seizures, and midazolam was used more often for children with epilepsy. Multivariable logistic regression of seizure termination by first-line anesthetic infusion (ketamine or midazolam) including age at SE onset, SE etiology category, and individual seizure duration at anesthetic infusion initiation indicated seizures were more likely to terminate following ketamine than midazolam (OR 4.00, 95% CI 1.69-9.49; P = 0.002) and adverse effects were more likely following midazolam than ketamine (OR 13.41, 95% CI 1.61-111.04; P = 0.016). Survival to discharge was higher among study participants who received midazolam (82%, 65/79) than ketamine (55%, 21/38; P = 0.002), although treating clinicians did not attribute any deaths to ketamine or midazolam.

CONCLUSIONS

Among children and neonates with RSE, ketamine was more often followed by seizure termination and less often associated with adverse effects than midazolam when administered as the first-line anesthetic infusion. Further prospective data are needed to compare first-line anesthetics for RSE.

Outpatient management of prolonged seizures and seizure clusters to prevent progression to a higher-level emergency: Consensus recommendations of an expert working group

OBJECTIVE

The management of prolonged seizures (PS) and seizure clusters (SC) is impeded by the lack of international, evidence-based guidance. We aimed to develop expert recommendations regarding consensus definitions of PS, SC, and treatment goals to prevent progression to higher-level emergencies such as status epilepticus (SE).

METHODS

An expert working group, comprising 12 epileptologists, neurologists, and pharmacologists from Europe and North America, used a modified Delphi consensus methodology to develop and anonymously vote on statements. Consensus was defined as ≥75% voting "Agree"/"Strongly agree."

RESULTS

All group members strongly agreed that termination of an ongoing seizure in as short a time as possible is the primary goal of rapid and early seizure termination (REST) and that an ideal medication for REST would start to act within 2 min of administration to terminate ongoing seizure activity. Consensus was reached on the terminology defining PS (with proposed thresholds of 5 min for prolonged focal seizures and 2 min for prolonged absence seizures and the convulsive phase of bilateral tonic-clonic seizures) and SC (an abnormal increase in seizure frequency compared with the individual patient's usual seizure pattern). All group members strongly agreed or agreed that patients who have experienced a PS should be offered a REST medication, and all patients who have experienced a SC should be offered an acute cluster treatment (ACT). Further, when prescribing a REST medication or ACT, a seizure action plan should be agreed upon in consultation with the patient and caregiver.

SIGNIFICANCE

The expert working group had a high level of agreement on the recommendations for defining and managing PS and SC. These recommendations will complement the existing guidance for the management of acute seizures, with the possibility of treating them earlier to potentially avoid progression to more severe seizures, including SE.

Outcome of emergency neurosurgery in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Background

Refractory (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) are serious neurological conditions requiring aggressive management. Beyond anesthetic agents, there is a lack of evidence guiding management in these patients. This systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) seeks to evaluate and compare the currently available surgical techniques for the acute treatment of RSE and SRSE.

Methods

A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Individual Participant Data (PRISMA-IPD). Only patients who underwent surgery while in RSE and SRSE were included. Descriptive statistics were used to compare various subgroups. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors of status epilepticus (SE) cessation, long-term overall seizure freedom, and favorable functional outcome (i.e., modified Rankin score of 0-2) at last follow-up.

Results

A total of 87 studies including 161 participants were included. Resective surgery tended to achieve better SE cessation rate (93.9%) compared to non-resective techniques (83.9%), but this did not reach significance (p = 0.071). Resective techniques were also more likely to achieve seizure freedom (69.1% vs. 34.4%, p = <0.0001). Older age at SE (OR = 1.384[1.046-1.832], p = 0.023) was associated with increased likelihood of SE cessation, while longer duration of SE (OR = 0.603[0.362-1.003], p = 0.051) and new-onset seizures (OR = 0.244[0.069-0.860], p = 0.028) were associated with lower likelihood of SE cessation, but this did not reach significance for SE duration. Only shorter duration of SE prior to surgery (OR = 1.675[1.168-2.404], p  = 0.0060) and immediate termination of SE (OR = 3.736 [1.323-10.548], p = 0.014) were independently associated with long-term seizure status. Rates of favorable functional outcomes (mRS of 0-2) were comparable between resective (44.4%) and non-resective (44.1%) techniques, and no independent predictors of outcome were identified.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that emergency neurosurgery may be a safe and effective alternative in patients with RSE/SRSE and may be considered earlier during the disease course. However, the current literature is limited exclusively to small case series and case reports with high risk of publication bias. Larger clinical trials assessing long-term seizure and functional outcomes are warranted to establish robust management guidelines.

The lactate receptor HCAR1: A key modulator of epileptic seizure activity

Epilepsy affects millions globally with a significant portion exhibiting pharmacoresistance. Abnormal neuronal activity elevates brain lactate levels, which prompted the exploration of its receptor, the hydroxycarboxylic acid receptor 1 (HCAR1) known to downmodulate neuronal activity in physiological conditions. This study revealed that HCAR1-deficient mice (HCAR1-KO) exhibited lowered seizure thresholds, and increased severity and duration compared to wild-type mice. Hippocampal and whole-brain electrographic seizure analyses revealed increased seizure severity in HCAR1-KO mice, supported by time-frequency analysis. The absence of HCAR1 led to uncontrolled inter-ictal activity in acute hippocampal slices, replicated by lactate dehydrogenase A inhibition indicating that the activation of HCAR1 is closely associated with glycolytic output. However, synthetic HCAR1 agonist administration in an in vivo epilepsy model did not modulate seizures, likely due to endogenous lactate competition. These findings underscore the crucial roles of lactate and HCAR1 in regulating circuit excitability to prevent unregulated neuronal activity and terminate epileptic events.

Best practices for the management of febrile seizures in children

Febrile seizures (FS) are commonly perceived by healthcare professionals as a self-limited condition with a generally 'benign' nature. Nonetheless, they frequently lead to pediatric consultations, and their management can vary depending on the clinical context. For parents and caregivers, witnessing a seizure can be a distressing experience, significantly impacting their quality of life. In this review, we offer an in-depth exploration of FS management, therapeutic interventions, and prognostic factors, with the aim of providing support for physicians and enhancing communication with families. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using the PubMed and Web of Science databases, spanning the past 50 years. The search terms utilized included "febrile seizure," "complex febrile seizure," "simple febrile seizure," in conjunction with "children" or "infant." Only studies published in English or those presenting evidence-based data were included in our assessment. Additionally, we conducted a cross-reference search to identify any additional relevant data sources. Our thorough literature search resulted in a compilation of references, with carefully selected papers thoughtfully integrated into this review.

Enteral Ketamine for Status Epilepticus in Children with Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Approximately 10% to 20% of children with epilepsy experience status epilepticus (SE), and children with seizure clustering are at higher risk. Ketamine is growing in use for SE. This study examines the efficacy and safety of enteral ketamine in the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) characterized by refractory seizure clusters and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in children with epilepsy.

METHODS

Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Children with epilepsy aged one to 21 years presenting in SE and treated with enteral ketamine between September 1, 2021 and September 1, 2022 at a pediatric tertiary care center were identified. Resolution or reduction in seizure frequency within 48 hours, clinical presentation, endotracheal intubation, hospitalization duration, side effects, and readmission were assessed.

RESULTS

Nine patients aged two to 21 years were identified. Six patients presented in CSE characterized by recurrent seizures, and three patients presented in NCSE. Five patients had genetic epilepsies, including PCDH19- and MECP2-related epilepsy. Seven patients had resolution or reduction in seizures within 48 hours of ketamine initiation. Two patients were intubated. Hospitalization duration ranged from one to 34 days. Three patients reported side effects. Three patient readmissions with early ketamine treatment had equal or shorter hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteral ketamine may prove an effective, well-tolerated option for treatment of convulsive and nonconvulsive SE in children with epilepsy, including genetic epilepsies, and may prevent intubation and shorten hospitalization time.

A Quality Initiative to Improve Appropriate Medication Dosing in Pediatric Patients with Obesity

Introduction

Emerging evidence supports the use of alternative dosing weights for medications in patients with obesity. Pediatric obesity presents a particular challenge because most medications are dosed based on patient weight. Additionally, building system-wide pediatric obesity safeguards is difficult due to pediatric obesity definitions of body mass index-percentile-for-age via the Center for Disease Control growth charts. We describe a quality initiative to increase appropriate medication dosing in inpatients with obesity. The specific aim was to increase appropriate dosing for 7 high-risk medications in inpatients with obesity ≥2 years old from 37% to >74% and to sustain for 1 year.

Methods

The Institute for Healthcare Improvement model for improvement was used to plan interventions and track outcomes progress. Interventions included a literature review to establish internal dosing guidance, electronic health record (EHR) functionality to identify pediatric patients with obesity, a default selection for medication weight with an opt-out, and obtaining patient heights in the emergency department.

Results

Appropriate dosing weight use in medication ordered for patients with obesity increased from 37% to 83.4% and was sustained above the goal of 74% for 12 months.

Conclusions

Implementation of EHR-based clinical decision support has increased appropriate evidence-based dosing of medications in pediatric and adult inpatients with obesity. Future studies should investigate the clinical and safety implications of using alternative dosing weights in pediatric patients.

Management of Pediatric Convulsive Status Epilepticus From the Perspective of Emergency Nurses: A Cross-sectional, Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric convulsive status epilepticus is one of the most common neurologic emergencies and should be managed by health care professionals as soon as possible based on current guidelines. This study aimed to determine the nursing approaches and management of pediatric convulsive status epilepticus from the perspective of emergency nurses in Turkey.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted with 162 emergency nurses working in emergency departments in 35 different provinces in Turkey. The data were collected via an online form. Descriptive statistical methods were used in data analysis.

RESULTS

Most emergency nurses (72.2%) attempted an intravenous access immediately to administer antiseizure medications during the stabilization phase. Approximately half the emergency nurses stated that rectal diazePAM was frequently administered in the initial therapy phase and intravenous diazePAM was administered in the second therapy phase. The emergency nurses had most difficulties attempting intravenous access, determining status epilepticus types, and calming the parents.

DISCUSSION

As health care professionals and important members of the health team, emergency nurses have the responsibility to manage pediatric convulsive status epilepticus in the fastest and the most appropriate way based on current practice guidelines in emergency departments. When intravenous access is not available, nonintravenous benzodiazepines should be considered in the first-line treatment of pediatric convulsive status epilepticus, followed by immediate intravenous access.

Time-sensitive healthcare guidelines for youth with chronic diseases in custody: gaps in care

CASE STUDY

On May 9th, 2023, a U.S. Border Patrol detained a family of five near Brownsville, TX. During processing, one of the family members, an eight-year-old girl, ADRA, was noted to have sickle cell anemia and a heart disease condition. Five days after they arrived at the Donna Facility, on May 14th, ADRA displayed symptoms, including abdominal pain and fever, and tested positive for Influenza A. She was administered medication and transferred to a designated isolation unit at the Harlingen Border Patrol Station. Despite her deteriorating condition and her mother's urgent requests for medical intervention, there were no documented consultations with an on-call physician or considerations for her transfer to a local hospital. On May 17th, ADRA's health critically declined, marked by multiple visits to the medical unit for vomiting and abdominal pain. An ambulance was dispatched only after ADRA experienced a seizure and became unresponsive, Fig. 1. Her subsequent death was deemed a "preventable tragedy" attributed to systemic failures in the Border Patrol's medical care and decision-making processes in a juvenile care monitor's report.1 IMPACT: This article adds to the existing literature by: Summarizing the gap in age-specific guidelines for six chronic diseases that occur in children and adolescents held in custody. Identifying the lack of adequate intervention strategies for acute management of chronic diseases for youth held in custody and strategies for improving health equity.

Survey of Pediatric Status Epilepticus Treatment Practices and Adherence to Management Guidelines (Pedi-SPECTRUM e-Survey)

Aim

Survey of treatment practices and adherence to pediatric status epilepticus (PSE) management guidelines in India.

Methods

This eSurvey was conducted over 35 days (15th October to 20th November 2023) and included questions related to hospital setting; antiseizure medications (ASMs); ancillary treatment; facilities available; etiology; and adherence to PSE management guidelines.

Results

A total of 170 respondents participated, majority of them were working in tertiary level hospitals (94.1%) as pediatric intensivists (56.5%) and pediatricians (19.4%), and were in clinical practice for 2-10 years (46.5%). Majority use intravenous (IV) midazolam and levetiracetam as first- and second-line ASMs (67.1 and 51.2%, respectively). In cases with refractory status epilepticus (RSE), the most commonly used ASM is midazolam infusion (92.4%). For super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), the commonly used third-line ASMs include midazolam infusion (34.1%), thiopentone infusion (26.5%), high dose phenobarbitone (18.2%), and ketamine infusion (15.3%). Overall, in cases with SRSE, 44.7% respondents use ketamine infusion, 42.5% use add-on oral topiramate, and 34.7% use high-dose phenobarbitone (1-3 mg/kg/hour) infusion. Most respondents targeted both clinical and EEG seizure control (48.8%). Ancillary treatment used for SRSE included IV pyridoxine (57.1%), methylprednisolone (45.3%), IVIG (42.4%), ketogenic diet (40.6%), and second-line immunomodulation (33.5%). Most common causes were febrile SE, viral encephalitis, and febrile illness-related epilepsy syndrome (60.6%, 52.4%, and 37.1%, respectively). Facilities available included pediatric intensive care units (PICU) (97.1%), mechanical ventilation (98.2%), pediatric neurologist (68.8%), MRI brain (86.5%), EEG (69.4%), and viral PCR (58.2%). The compliance with guidelines for timing of initiation of ASM ranged from 63.5 to 88.8%.

Conclusion

Intravenous midazolam bolus/es, levetiracetam, and midazolam infusion are commonly used first-, second-, and third-line ASMs, respectively. There were wide variations in use of ASMs for RSE and SRSE, ancillary treatment, and compliance to PSE management guidelines.

How to cite this article

Suthar R, Angurana SK, Nallasamy K, Bansal A, Muralidharan J. Survey of Pediatric Status Epilepticus Treatment Practices and Adherence to Management Guidelines (Pedi-SPECTRUM e-Survey). Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(5):504-510.

Excessive Use of Benzodiazepines Is a Risk Factor for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Who Present to Emergency With Prehospital Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVES

There is lack of evidence-based information on the use and timing of endotracheal intubation (ETI) in children with prehospital status epilepticus (SE).

METHODS

The aim of this study was to investigate ETI use, timing, risk factors, and outcomes in children presenting to a single-center children's emergency (CE) with prehospital SE, over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

A total of 118 events involving children presenting to CE with ongoing prehospital SE were included, and 39% (46/118) of the events required ETI. The most common indication for ETI was respiratory depression. The median time to intubation after arrival at CE was 20.0 minutes (1-155 minutes). Risk factors associated with ETI use include the administration of more than 2 benzodiazepines (26.1% vs 4.2%, P < 0.001) and the use of second- or third-line antiepileptic therapy ( P < 0.001). The use of more than 2 doses of benzodiazepines was found in 12.7% (15/118) of the patients. In patients who received excessive benzodiazepines, 87% (13/15) of them required intubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive use of benzodiazepine was found to be a main risk factor for ETI in patients with prehospital SE. Avoidance of the excessive use of benzodiazepines and adhering to clinical management guidelines may reduce the risk for ETI in the CE. The best approach to airway management in children with prehospital SE is lacking and urgently needed.

Try, Try Again: Success Rates After Continued Treatment Attempts in Refractory Status Epilepticus

Staged Treatment Response in Status Epilepticus: Lessons From the SENSE Registry Beuchat I, Novy J, Rosenow F, Kellinghaus C, Rüegg S, Tilz C, Trinka E, Unterberger I, Uzelac Z, Strzelczyk A, Rossetti AO. Epilepsia . 2023. doi:10.1111/epi.17817 Objectives: Although in epilepsy patients the likelihood of becoming seizure-free decreases substantially with each unsuccessful treatment, to our knowledge this has been poorly investigated in status epilepticus (SE). We aimed to evaluate the proportion of SE cessation and functional outcome after successive treatment steps. Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort (SENSE), in which 1049 incident adult SE episodes were prospectively recorded at 9 European centers. We analyzed 996 SE episodes without coma-induction before the third treatment step. Rates of SE cessation, mortality (in ongoing SE or after SE control), and favorable functional outcome (assessed with modified Rankin Scale) were evaluated after each step. Results: SE was successfully treated in 838 (84.1%) patients, 147 (14.8%) had a fatal outcome (36% of them died while still in SE), and 11 patients were transferred to palliative care while still in SE. Patients were treated with a median of three treatment steps (range 1-13) with 540 (54.2%) receiving more than two steps (refractory SE, RSE) and 95 (9.5%) more than five. SE was controlled after the first two steps in 45%, with additional 21% treated after the third, and 14% after the fourth step. Likelihood of SE cessation (p < 0.001), survival (p = 0.003), and reaching good functional outcome (p < 0.001) significantly decreased between the first two treatment lines and the third, especially in patients not experiencing convulsive generalized SE, but remained relatively stable afterwards. Significance: The significant worsening of SE prognosis after the second step clinically supports the concept of RSE. However, and differing from findings in human epilepsy, RSE remains treatable in around one third of patients even after several failed treatment steps. Clinical judgement remains essential to determine the aggressiveness and duration of SE treatment and avoid premature treatment cessation in SE patients.

The Evolving Role of Electroencephalography in Postarrest Care

Electroencephalography is an accessible, portable, noninvasive and safe means of evaluating a patient's brain activity. It can aid in diagnosis and management decisions for post-cardiac arrest patients with seizures, myoclonus and other non-epileptic movements. It also plays an important role in a multimodal approach to neuroprognostication predicting both poor and favorable outcomes. Individuals ordering, performing and interpreting these tests, regardless of the indication, should understand the supporting evidence, logistical considerations, limitations and impact the results may have on postarrest patients and their families as outlined herein.

Delayed Deterioration of Electroencephalogram in Patients with Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of delayed deterioration of electroencephalogram (EEG) in patients with cardiac arrest (CA) without early highly malignant patterns and to determine their associations with clinical findings.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients with CA admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. We included all patients with CA who had a normal voltage EEG, no more than 10% discontinuity, and absence of sporadic epileptic discharges, periodic discharges, or electrographic seizures. Delayed deterioration was classified as the following: (1) epileptic deterioration, defined as the appearance, at least 24 h after CA, of sporadic epileptic discharges, periodic discharges, and status epilepticus; or (2) background deterioration, defined as increasing discontinuity or progressive attenuation of the background at least 24 h after CA. The end points were the incidence of EEG deteriorations and their association with clinical features and ICU mortality.

RESULTS

We enrolled 188 patients in the analysis. The ICU mortality was 46%. Overall, 30 (16%) patients presented with epileptic deterioration and 9 (5%) patients presented with background deterioration; of those, two patients presented both deteriorations. Patients with epileptic deterioration more frequently had an out-of-hospital CA, and higher time to return of spontaneous circulation and less frequently had bystander resuscitation than others. Patients with background deterioration showed a predominantly noncardiac cause, more frequently developed shock, and had multiple organ failure compared with others. Patients with epileptic deterioration presented with a higher ICU mortality (77% vs. 41%; p < 0.01) than others, whereas all patients with background deterioration died in the ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed EEG deterioration was associated with high mortality rate. Epileptic deterioration was associated with worse characteristics of CA, whereas background deterioration was associated with shock and multiple organ failure.

An Emergency Department Quality Improvement Project for Intravenous Levetiracetam Administration

Background: Levetiracetam is a readily available, safe anticonvulsive medication. It is frequently administered as IV piggyback with a pump, carrier fluid, and tubing. The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial demonstrated levetiracetam being similarly effective to previously used treatments in doses up to 4500 mg administered over 10 minutes. Objective: We sought to compare usage, cost, and waste of IV piggyback with IV push administration of levetiractam following implementation of an IV push protocol in an academic emergency department. Methods: A three-month review of levetiracetam administration was done following protocol implementation using IV push for initial treatment of benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus. The review quantified the number of IV push vs IV piggyback doses for all indications and evaluated cost of supplies necessary for administration. Results: During the study period, 137 patients received 142 doses of IV levetiracetam. Fifty-one doses (36%) were given as IV push rather than IV piggyback. The majority of doses 116 (82%) were 1000-2000 mg and 11 doses (8%) 3500-4500 mg. Estimated three-month savings with complete transition of IV piggyback to IV push would exceed $6000 just in our ED. The amount of sterile solution carrier fluid was also reduced and IV pump time freed. Conclusion: Implementation of an emergency department IV push levetiracetam protocol resulted in cost savings. Opportunities remain to improve clinical implementation practices. Medication administration represents one crucial target area where healthcare systems can implement policies to reduce waste and commit to climate-smart health care.

General Anesthesia Exposure in Infancy and Childhood: A 10-year Bibliometric Analysis

PURPOSE

Heated discussions have divided health care providers and policymakers on the risks versus benefits of general anesthesia in pediatric populations. We conducted this study to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of general anesthesia in this specific population over the past decade.

DESIGN

We summarized and quantitatively analyzed the studies related to general anesthesia in children and infants over the past decade.

METHODS

Using the Web of Science Core Collection as the data source, we analyzed the literature using CiteSpace software, focusing on authors, countries, institutions, keywords, and references to identify hotspots and predict research trends.

FINDINGS

A total of 2,364 publications on pediatric anesthesia were included in the analysis. The number of related publications and citations steadily increased from 2013 to 2022. The United States was the leading country in terms of output, and University of Toronto was the primary contributing institution. Co-citation analysis revealed that over the past decade research has mainly focused on the long-term adverse effects of general anesthesia on neurodevelopment and acute perioperative crisis events. Keyword analysis identified infant sedation and drug selection and compatibility as promising areas for development. In addition, improving the quality of perioperative anesthesia will be a major research focus in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent research in pediatric anesthesia has focused on mitigating the adverse effects of general anesthesia in infants and young children and studying the pharmacological compatibility of anesthetics. Our study results would assist researchers and clinicians in understanding the current research status and optimizing clinical practice in this field.

Drug therapy problems and contributing factors among patients with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Although antiseizure medications play a crucial role in the management of epilepsy, their benefit can be compromised due to drug-related problems. Drug therapy problems can lead to poor seizure control, reduced quality of life, and increased morbidity and mortality in patients with epilepsy. However, in our setting, there is limited knowledge about drug therapy problems and the factors that contribute to them.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and contributing factors of drug-therapy problems among patients with epilepsy.

METHODOLOGY

A hospital-based prospective observational study was conducted at the neurologic clinic of Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, located in the Tigray region of Northern Ethiopia. The study included adult patients diagnosed with epilepsy who had been taking at least one antiseizure medication for a minimum of six months. Data were collected by conducting patient interviews and expert reviews of medical and medication records. Prior to data review and interviews, each patient provided written informed consent. Drug therapy problems were identified and classified using Cipolle's method, followed by a consensus review conducted with a panel of experts. Statistical analysis was performed using a statistical software package; SPSS version 22. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the contributing factors of drug therapy problems. Statistical significance was determined at p<0.05.

RESULTS

A study conducted on 250 participants revealed that 55.2% of the patients experienced one or more drug therapy problems. Our analysis identified a total of 282 drug therapy problems, with a mean of 2±0.52 drug therapy problems per patient. The most commonly observed drug therapy problems were dosage too low (30.0%), noncompliance (22%), adverse drug reaction (18%), and unnecessary drug therapy (16.4%). The commonly involved antiseizure medications in these drug therapy problems were phenytoin (22.8%), Valproic acid (20.8%), and Phenobarbital (18.4%). Furthermore, our findings revealed that combination therapy (AOR: 3.92, 95%CI: 1.19-12.97) and uncontrolled seizure (AOR: 108.37, 95%CI: 38.7-303.6) exhibited significant associations with drug therapy problems.

CONCLUSION

Drug therapy problems were prevalent among patients with epilepsy. The use of combination therapy and the presence of uncontrolled seizures were identified as significant indicators of drug therapy problems. Therefore, more emphasis should be given to patients with multiple medications and uncontrolled seizures.

Rapid administration of undiluted loading doses of levetiracetam

OBJECTIVE

Rapid administration of antiseizure medications is a critical concept in the treatment of status epilepticus. Although undiluted levetiracetam (LEV) doses of up to 2500 mg have been evaluated, minimal data exist to support the safety of loading doses up to 4500 mg. This study will evaluate intravenous (IV) push administration of undiluted LEV from 2500 to 4500 mg for safety outcomes as well as tolerability.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational, cohort analysis of adult patients who received at least one loading dose of undiluted IV push LEV from October 15, 2019, to April 30, 2022, at a large academic medical center in Phoenix, Arizona. Relevant outcomes include the safety and tolerability of rapid administration of undiluted LEV at higher loading doses.

RESULTS

We evaluated 518 loading doses in 518 unique patients included during the study period. LEV was a new medication for witnessed or suspected seizures in 80.3% of patients, with 31.2% having a documented history of epilepsy or seizure disorder. At the time of LEV administration, 52.9% of patients were on a general medicine floor, 34.3% were in the intensive care unit, and 12.7% were in the emergency department. The median loading dose of LEV was 3600 mg (3000-4000 mg), with 4000 mg being the most common loading dose given. Peripheral IV lines were documented as the only available line in 78.6% of patients for loading dose administration. No adverse events associated with LEV administration were documented.

SIGNIFICANCE

Rapid IV administration of undiluted doses of LEV is both safe and tolerable in loading doses of 2500-4500 mg, allowing for rapid drug administration in the setting of status epilepticus.