The use of nasal dilator strips as a placebo for trials evaluating continuous positive airway pressure

[Home CPAP Remote Monitoring as a System to Control Adaptation and Titration in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea and its Impact on the Management of this Pathology (T-CPAP Project)]

Introduction

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) constitutes the most effective treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Automatic titration systems (ATS) are predominantly used to achieve adaptation to the equipment. Home CPAP devices allow telemonitoring (TM) of the same parameters as those provided by ATS but with access to continuous usage data. Under this premise, we conducted a study on the potential validity of TM for home CPAP devices as a titration system, its direct impact on proper adaptation (AD) to the equipment, and secondarily on the healthcare resources employed to achieve it.

Material and methods

An observational study involving 318 patients with OSA who were titrated using TM to achieve AD to CPAP. Patients with OSA were consecutively recruited and evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months after initiating treatment. Results were compared with a historical group of 307 patients with OSA who achieved AD to CPAP using ATS. Additionally, we assessed the impact on required healthcare resources.

Results

Patients with OSA who initiated CPAP treatment with TM over the first six months showed a similar AD rate compared to the historical group titrated using ATS, with lower resource usage in the TM group.

Conclusion

Data provided by TM of home CPAP devices allow for titration and achieving similar AD as with ATS in non-complex patients.

Positive Airway Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Pilot Randomized Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial

Rationale: Maternal obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea (OSAH) is associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). OSAH treatment with positive airway pressure (PAP) in the general population lowers blood pressure (BP). However, there are limited data on the effects of PAP therapy in maternal OSAH. Objectives: Our primary objective was to assess the feasibility of recruitment to a pilot randomized trial and adherence to PAP therapy for OSAH in women with HDP. Secondary objectives included assessment of PAP effects on 24-h BP, arterial stiffness, and maternal and fetal outcomes. Methods: Women with singleton pregnancies at ⩾12 weeks' gestation and hypertension underwent home level 2 polysomnography; those with mild to moderate OSAH (apnea-hypopnea index ⩾ 5 events/h; women with severe OSAH with apnea-hypopnea index > 30 events/h and oxygen desaturation index > 30 were excluded) were randomized to either PAP or nasal dilator strip (NDS; control) therapy. After PAP education, adherence was monitored online with episodic phone or in-person support by research personnel. Twenty-four-hour BP and arterial stiffness were assessed at baseline and before delivery. Maternal and fetal outcomes were also recorded. Results: Of 105 potentially eligible participants, 67 agreed to undergo screening for OSAH over 38 months; 48 women meeting OSAH inclusion criteria were randomized to PAP (n = 27) or NDS (n = 21) therapy. Of these, 14 PAP (52%) and 13 NDS (62%) participants completed all predelivery measurements, with lack of completion due to urgent delivery (19% in the PAP group, 14% in the NDS group), PAP intolerance at initiation (19%), or other factors. Mean PAP use was 3.1 ± 2.5 h/night, with use ⩾4 h/night on 38.4 ± 33.7% of nights during 9.6 ± 4.0 weeks of treatment. BP was controlled within the target range in most participants. There were no differences in mean change in 24-hour BP or arterial stiffness measurements or in adverse maternal and fetal outcomes between the PAP and NDS groups in either intention-to-treat or per-protocol analyses. Conclusions: PAP adherence was suboptimal in this HDP cohort despite education and troubleshooting. Further work is required to identify optimal OSAH treatment strategies during pregnancy. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03309826).

Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in commercial respiratory interventions: an evidence-based guide for health and exercise professionals

Respiratory function has become a global health priority. Not only is chronic respiratory disease a leading cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality, but the COVID-19 pandemic has heightened attention on respiratory health and the means of enhancing it. Subsequently, and inevitably, the respiratory system has become a target of the multi-trillion-dollar health and wellness industry. Numerous commercial, respiratory-related interventions are now coupled to therapeutic and/or ergogenic claims that vary in their plausibility: from the reasonable to the absurd. Moreover, legitimate and illegitimate claims are often conflated in a wellness space that lacks regulation. The abundance of interventions, the range of potential therapeutic targets in the respiratory system, and the wealth of research that varies in quality, all confound the ability for health and exercise professionals to make informed risk-to-benefit assessments with their patients and clients. This review focuses on numerous commercial interventions that purport to improve respiratory health, including nasal dilators, nasal breathing, and systematized breathing interventions (such as pursed-lips breathing), respiratory muscle training, canned oxygen, nutritional supplements, and inhaled L-menthol. For each intervention we describe the premise, examine the plausibility, and systematically contrast commercial claims against the published literature. The overarching aim is to assist health and exercise professionals to distinguish science from pseudoscience and make pragmatic and safe risk-to-benefit decisions.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

METHODS

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Predictors of the Efficacy for Daytime Sleepiness in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Continual Positive Airway Pressure Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

The main aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the predictors of the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in ameliorating excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1994 and October 2021 were searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The weighted mean differences (WMDs) for the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores, the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT), and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) were pooled in STATA.

Results

A total of 41 RCTs involving 7,332 patients were included. CPAP therapy was found to be significantly associated with changes in ESS (WMD = −2.14, P < 0.001), MSLT (WMD = 1.23, P < 0.001), and MWT (WMD = 1.6, P < 0.001). Meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis indicated that in mild OSA, the efficacy of CPAP therapy for subjective EDS was limited to patients <50 years of age, with a baseline body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m², baseline ESS score of ≥11, therapy adherence for ≥3 h/night, and treatment duration of ≥2 months. In moderate OSA, significant differences were observed in the changes in ESS among groups stratified by baseline ESS score (P = 0.005), adherence (P < 0.001), treatment duration (P = 0.009), and trial design type (P = 0.001). In severe OSA, this difference was observed among groups stratified by baseline BMI (P = 0.028), baseline ESS score (P = 0.001), and adherence (P = 0.047). Patients with moderate-severe OSA but not mild OSA showed significant improvements in MSLT. Patients with the age <50 years or BMI ≥33 kg/m² had a more significant increase in MWT.

Conclusion

Continuous positive airway pressure therapy improved subjective and objective sleepiness in patients with OSA. Age, baseline BMI, baseline ESS score, adherence, and duration of treatment may predict the effects of CPAP on EDS in patients with OSA. Notably, the baseline ESS scores and adherence were stable predictors regardless of OSA severity.

Effects of CPAP on Metabolic Syndrome in Patients With OSA: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

OSA is associated with metabolic syndrome (MS), but it is unclear whether OSA treatment with CPAP can revert MS.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does OSA treatment with CPAP per se have effects on the MS reversibility and the associated metabolic, adiposity and vascular parameters?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The TREATOSA-MS trial is a randomized placebo-controlled trial that enrolled adult patients with a recent diagnosis of MS and moderate or severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], ≥ 15 events/h) to undergo therapeutic CPAP or nasal dilator strips (placebo group) for 6 months. Before and after each intervention, we measured anthropometric variables, BP, glucose, and lipid profile. To control potential-related mechanisms and consequences, we also measured adiposity biomarkers (leptin and adiponectin), body composition, food intake, physical activity, subcutaneous and abdominal fat (visceral and hepatic fat), and endothelial function.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (79% men; mean age, 48 ± 9 years; BMI, 33 ± 4 kg/m²; AHI, 58 ± 29 events/h) completed the study (n = 50 per group). The mean CPAP adherence was 5.5 ± 1.5 h/night. After 6 months, most patients with OSA randomized to CPAP retained the MS diagnosis, but the rate of MS reversibility was higher than observed in the placebo group (18% vs 4%; OR, 5.27; 95% CI, 1.27-35.86; P = .04). In the secondary analysis, CPAP did not promote significant reductions in the individual components of MS, weight, hepatic steatosis, lipid profile, adiponectin, and leptin, but did promote a very modest reduction in visceral fat and improved endothelial function (all analyses were adjusted for baseline values).

INTERPRETATION

Despite the higher rate of MS reversibility after CPAP therapy as compared with placebo, most patients retained this diagnosis. The lack of significant or relevant effects on adiposity biomarkers and depots supports the modest role of OSA in modulating MS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02295202; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Impact of nasal dilator strips on measures of sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Women with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in pregnancy are at a greater risk of developing serious adverse perinatal outcomes. However, the pathogenesis of SDB in pregnancy is poorly understood. As nasal congestion is common in pregnancy, nasal obstruction may contribute to SDB in this population. This study aims to assess the impact of nasal dilator strips (NDS) on measures of SDB and their potential for use as a placebo condition.

METHODS

Pregnant women ≥ 18 years old, body mass index ≥ 27 kg/m², and habitual snoring were enrolled. Participants completed 2 consecutive level III home sleep apnea tests and used NDS during the second test. Objective measures including respiratory event index and pulse transit time drop index, a measure of increased arterial stiffness, were compared across tests. Subjective assessments of participants' perceived impact of NDS use was also obtained.

RESULTS

54 women, 59% White, 60% in the third trimester were enrolled. Median time between the 2 studies was 1 day (interquartile range [IQR] 4). There was no significant change between the night without NDS use and the night with NDS use in respiratory event index (5.30 [IQR 6.20] vs 4.80 [IQR 6.78], P = .8) or pulse transit time drop index (6.8 [IQR 13.3] vs 6.6 [IQR 15.8], P = .360). Subjective measures of sleep did not differ between the 2 nights.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high prevalence of pregnancy-associated rhinitis, NDS do not have a significant impact on measures of SDB. Results from this study support the use of NDS as an appropriate placebo in prenatal clinical trials.

CITATION

Maxwell M, Sanapo L, Monteiro K, et al. Impact of nasal dilator strips on measures of sleep-disordered breathing in pregnancy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(2):477-483.

International Consensus Document on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

The main aim of this international consensus document on obstructive sleep apnea is to provide guidelines based on a critical analysis of the latest literature to help health professionals make the best decisions in the care of adult patients with this disease. The expert working group was formed primarily of 17 scientific societies and 56 specialists from a wide geographical area (including the participation of 4 international societies), an expert in methodology, and a documentalist from the Iberoamerican Cochrane Center. The document consists of a main section containing the most significant innovations and a series of online manuscripts that report the systematic literature searches performed for each section of the international consensus document. This document does not discuss pediatric patients or the management of patients receiving chronic non-invasive mechanical ventilation (these topics will be addressed in separate consensus documents).

Considering the Role of Adherence in New and Emerging Sleep Treatments

There are several novel and emerging treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), including new devices and pharmacotherapies. Long-term efficacy and adherence data for these interventions in the sleep context are lacking. Future studies exploring the long-term adherence and efficacy in novel and emerging treatments of OSA are required to fully understand the place of these treatments in treatment hierarchies. Such research also should aim to evaluate the use of these novel therapies in real-world clinical settings, because many of the studies performed to date have been done under closely monitored research populations and relatively small sample sizes.

Sleep quality in acromegaly and changes after transsphenoidal surgery: a prospective longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the sleep quality characteristics and factors related to either good or poor sleep quality in acromegaly patients before surgery and to explore sleep quality changes after transsphenoidal surgery and the factors related to these changes.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 39 acromegaly patients and 78 patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Scales for anxiety, depression, disease stigma and nasal condition were evaluated. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire was administered before surgery as well as one month and three months after surgery.

RESULTS

A higher percentage of acromegaly patients had poor sleep quality compared to controls (35.9% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001). In addition, acromegaly patients experienced worse subjective sleep quality, extended sleep latency, increased sleep disturbance and decreased daytime functioning. Higher scores for anxiety, disease stigma and sinonasal outcomes were correlated with worse sleep quality in acromegaly patients. At one month after transsphenoidal surgery, we found worse subjective sleep quality, extended sleep latency, shortened sleep duration, impaired sleep efficiency and increased sleep disturbance in acromegaly patients. At three months postoperatively, most impaired PSQI domains in acromegaly patients recovered to preoperative levels. The use of soluble gauze was related to decreased sleep quality at one month after surgery and severe anxiety and depression were related to improved sleep quality at three months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep quality was reduced in acromegaly patients. Moreover, sleep quality initially worsened after surgery but later recovered. Emotional problems and the use of soluble gauze were related factors.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

None.

Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Positive Airway Pressure: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this systematic review is to provide supporting evidence for the clinical practice guideline for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults using positive airway pressure (PAP).

METHODS

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine. A systematic review was conducted to identify studies that compared the use of PAP with no treatment as well as studies that compared different PAP modalities. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the clinical significance of using PAP in several modalities (ie, continuous PAP, auto-adjusting PAP, and bilevel PAP), to treat OSA in adults. In addition, meta-analyses were performed to determine the clinical significance of using an in-laboratory versus ambulatory strategy for the initiation of PAP, educational and behavioral interventions, telemonitoring, humidification, different mask interfaces, and flexible or modified pressure profile PAP in conjunction with PAP to treat OSA in adults. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process was used to assess the evidence for making recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 336 studies that met inclusion criteria; 184 studies provided data suitable for meta-analyses. The data demonstrated that PAP compared to no treatment results in a clinically significant reduction in disease severity, sleepiness, blood pressure, and motor vehicle accidents, and improvement in sleep-related quality of life in adults with OSA. In addition, the initiation of PAP in the home demonstrated equivalent effects on patient outcomes when compared to an in-laboratory titration approach. The data also demonstrated that the use of auto-adjusting or bilevel PAP did not result in clinically significant differences in patient outcomes compared with standard continuous PAP. Furthermore, data demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in PAP adherence with the use of educational, behavioral, troubleshooting, and telemonitoring interventions. Systematic reviews for specific PAP delivery method were also performed and suggested that nasal interfaces compared to oronasal interfaces have improved adherence and slightly greater reductions in OSA severity, heated humidification compared to no humidification reduces some continuous PAP-related side effects, and pressure profile PAP did not result in clinically significant differences in patient outcomes compared with standard continuous PAP.

Nasal dilation effects on olfactory deposition in unilateral and bi-directional deliveries: In vitro tests and numerical modeling

The human nose can expand either actively or passively to increase airflow. Nasal dilation may alter drug delivery efficiencies in the nasal airway or olfactory region. However, the dosage enhancement from nasal dilations has not been quantified. The mechanisms underlying the dilation-induced deposition variation are also not clear. This study aims to quantify the nasal dilation effects on drug delivery in the nasal airway and olfactory region using in vitro tests and numerical analysis. Two variants of an existing normal nasal airway model were developed with different levels of airway dilation. Airway dimensions were quantified in terms of hydraulic diameter, cross-sectional area, and surface area to volume ratio. Sectional nose casts were prepared using a 3-D printer for visualizing deposition patterns and quantifying delivered dosages. A well-validated computational fluid-particle dynamics (CFPD) model was utilized to understand the underlying mechanisms in the unilateral and bi-directional deliveries. In vitro tests show that nasal dilation lowered the total dosage in the nose but increased the dosage to the olfactory region in both the unilateral and bi-directional deliveries. Compared to the normal nose with unilateral delivery, nasal dilation enhanced the olfactory deposition by a factor of 2.2, while nasal dilatation with the bi-directional delivery increased by a factor of 4. Complementary numerical analyses revealed the growth of a recirculation zone in the middle meatus of dilated noses, which induced lower pressure and increased ventilation to the upper nose. In bi-directional deliveries, a significantly higher fraction of airflow was ventilated to the upper airway in the outflow side of the nose and contributed to the elevated olfactory dosage. Nasal dilation in combination with the bi-directional delivery is recommended over the conventional unilateral method for olfactory targeting.

Short-term efficacy of minimally invasive treatments for adult obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Many treatments have been proposed for adult obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but no comprehensive comparison of all interventions has been performed. We aimed to compare and rank the effectiveness of all minimally invasive treatments for adult OSA in a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Literature was searched within Ovid MedLine, EMBASE Classic+Embase, Cochrane library, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to Aug 9th, 2016 for randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive treatments for adult OSA. The outcomes were the changes in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). Frequentist approach to network meta-analysis was used and treatment hierarchy was summarized according to the surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves. Eighty-nine randomized controlled trials comprising 6346 adult OSA participants and comparing 18 different interventions were included. In comparison with no treatment, positive airway pressure (PAP) was most effective in reducing AHI (23.28 [weighted mean difference]; 95% confidence interval: 19.20-27.35). PAP was ranked first followed by mandibular advancement device (MAD) in reducing AHI. Exercise was ranked first followed by cervico-mandibular support collar in reducing ESS. Considering the effectiveness in reducing both AHI and ESS, PAP was ranked the best, followed by MAD and positional therapy, while lifestyle modification alone was the least effective intervention. Interventions that are highly effective in reducing objective laboratory-derived AHI do not demonstrate equivalent effectiveness in improving patients' subjective sleepiness. Future improvement of the interventions is necessary to simultaneously improve both objective and subjective outcomes.

[Treating nasal obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea patients]

The impact of treating nasal obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients is still intensively discussed at congresses. This is likely due to the highly conflicting results of nasal treatments in regard to restorative sleep on the one hand, and their influence on the severity of OSA on the other. Both conservative and surgical nasal treatments result in a highly significant improvement of sleep quality. Patients' sleep is more restorative, which has a huge impact on several quality of life parameters. In contrast, the impact of conservative and surgical nasal treatments on the severity of OSA measured using the apnea-hypopnea index is very limited, apart from rare exceptions. However, there are preliminary data indicating that successful nasal surgery may facilitate or enable nasal ventilation therapy by lowering the effective pressure.

[S2e-guideline: "ENT-specific therapy of obstructive sleep apnea in adults" short version : Sleep Medicine Task Force of the German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery]

The present S2e-guideline is an update of the former S2e-guideline "treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in adults". The update was performed on behalf of the German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery by its Sleep Medicine Task Force. The long version of the guideline is valid from 5.9.2015 to 5.9.2020 and has been available (guideline No. 017-069) since November 2015 on the official AWMF website.The subsequently presented short version of the guideline summarizes the essentials in a legible way. For further information, please refer to the long version.

Nasal Dilator Strip is an Effective Placebo Intervention for Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of nasal dilator strip (NDS) as a placebo intervention compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

Patients were treated with both NDS and nasal CPAP. The sequence was randomized and interposed by 15 days of washout. Polysomnography was performed at baseline and on the first night of intervention with NDS and CPAP (titration). The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were completed at baseline and at the end of both interventions. A questionnaire on the comfort and satisfaction (0 = no to 10 = total) was completed at the end of each intervention.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with OSA were evaluated (19 male; age 46.3 ± 9.3 y; body mass index 33.2 ± 5.1 kg/m²; ESS 15.8 ± 4.1; apnea-hypopnea index 60.7 ± 25.2). Adherence was high in both NDS (98%) and CPAP interventions (94%; 5.8 ± 1.7 h/night). In contrast to the baseline values, NDS intervention had no significant effect on all polysomnographic parameters, but NDS improved somnolence (ESS 13.0 ± 5.4, p = 0.001) and depressive symptoms (BDI 7.7 ± 6.9, p = 0.005). Reported satisfaction was significantly higher for CPAP than for NDS (sleep quality 9.2 ± 0.8 vs. 6.1 ± 2.1; wake up at morning: 8.6 ± 1.2 vs. 6.0 ± 2.2; daily activities: 8.9 ± 1.4 vs. 5.8 ± 1.5; quality of life: 8.3 ± 2.1 vs. 3.8 ± 3.5, p < 0.001), but similar low levels of difficulty for both interventions were observed (1.3 ± 2.2 vs. 0.3 ± 1.3, p = 0.098).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that NDS is an attractive placebo intervention for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of CPAP in sleepy patients with OSA.

Nasal Dilators (Breathe Right Strips and NoZovent) for Snoring and OSA: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective. To systematically review the international literature for studies evaluating internal (NoZovent) and external (Breathe Right Strips) nasal dilators as treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Study Design. Systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods. Four databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, were searched through September 29, 2016. Results. One-hundred twelve studies were screened, fifty-eight studies were reviewed, and fourteen studies met criteria. In 147 patients, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was reported, and there was an improvement from a mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD) of 28.7 ± 24.0 to 27.4 ± 23.3 events/hr, p value 0.64. There was no significant change in AHI, lowest oxygen saturation, or snoring index in OSA patients when using nasal dilators. However, a subanalysis demonstrated a slight reduction in apnea index (AI) with internal nasal dilators (decrease by 4.87 events/hr) versus minimal change for external nasal dilators (increase by 0.64 events/hr). Conclusion. Although nasal dilators have demonstrated improved nasal breathing, they have not shown improvement in obstructive sleep apnea outcomes, with the exception of mild improvement in apnea index when internal nasal dilators were used.

ENT-specific therapy of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults : A revised version of the previously published German S2e guideline

The German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery recently has released the abbreviated version of its scientific guideline "ENT-specific therapy of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in adults", which has been updated in 2015 and can be found online at the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF). A summary of the main recommendations is provided in this revised English version. All recommendations are based on a systematic literature research of articles published up until March 2014. Literature research followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Literature Research to create Guidelines published by the German Cochrane Centre. Studies were evaluated with respect to their scientific value according to the recommendations of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, and grades of recommendation are provided regarding each intervention.

Comorbid insomnia and sleep disordered breathing

OPINION STATEMENT

Sufficient evidence has accumulated to warrant conceptualization of comorbid insomnia and sleep disordered breathing (SDB) as a distinct clinical syndrome. As such, diagnostic and treatment approaches should be founded on an integrated and multidisciplinary approach with equivalent clinical attention and priority given to both insomnia and respiratory aspects of patients' presenting complaints. Several well established and effective treatments exist for both insomnia and SDB. Although questions of optimal treatment combination and sequence remain to be examined, current evidence provides preliminary guidance regarding the sequential or concurrent management of insomnia and sleep disordered breathing when comorbid. Unsatisfactory response to pharmacotherapy or cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia should trigger evaluation for comorbid sleep-related breathing disturbance prior to more aggressive or off label pharmacotherapy. Presence and course of insomnia symptoms should be monitored closely in SDB patients with persistence of insomnia symptoms following SDB treatment prompting targeted treatment of insomnia. Aggressive treatment of insomnia prior to or in combination with SDB treatment may be particularly indicated in situations where insomnia is suspected to interfere with diagnosis or treatment of SDB. Insomnia and sleep disordered breathing appear to uniquely contribute to the morbidity of patients with this comorbidity. With this in mind, active engagement and monitoring of SDB and insomnia will often be necessary to achieve optimal outcomes.