Survival Outcomes for Patients with Surgical and Non-Surgical Treatments in Stages I-III Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Survival of small-cell lung cancer patients after surgery: A single-center retrospective cohort study

This study summarized and analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients after surgical treatment. The clinical data of 130 patients (99 males and 31 females) with SCLC treated by surgery and confirmed by postoperative pathological examination at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from April 2004 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics, surgery, pathological stage, and perioperative treatment were summarized. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression analysis were performed. Pathological examination revealed that 36 (27.69%) patients had stage I SCLC, 22 (16.92%) patients had stage II SCLC, 65 (50.00%) patients had stage III SCLC, and 7 (5.39%) patients had stage IV SCLC. The overall median survival time was 50 months (95% confidence interval, 10.8-89.2 months). The median survival time of stage I, II, III and IV SCLC patients was 148, 42, 32, and 10 months, respectively. In patients who underwent surgical treatment, postoperative adjuvant therapy and tumor stage were independent prognostic factors for survival (p < 0.05).Lobectomy and lymph nodes resection combined with adjuvant therapy were cautiously recommended for stage I-IIIa SCLC patients.

Prognostic Relevance of Negative Lymph Node Count in Resected Stage I-IIIa Small-cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The prognostic significance of the negative lymph node (NLN) count has been confirmed in various cancers but not in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aimed to evaluate the correlation between the NLN count and the prognosis of patients with stages I-IIIa SCLC who underwent lobectomy.

METHODS

Data on the clinical characteristics of SCLC patients who underwent lobectomy between 2000 and 2019 were collected from the SEER database and organized based on the X-tile plots to identify the optimal cutoff point for the NLN count. Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Based on the X-tile plot-determined cutoff points of 3 and 7, the participants were grouped into the low (<3), middle (3-7), and high (>7) NLN subgroups for the analysis of OS. Univariable analysis showed that a higher NLN count correlated with more favorable OS and lung cancer-specific survival (both P <0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, after adjustment for related factors, the NLN count was positively associated with the prognosis and might thus be an independent risk factor for prognosis. Subgroup analyses revealed that, among different LN statuses and varied positive LN counts, the NLN count could predict the prognosis independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher NLNs correlated with better survival for patients who underwent lobectomy of stages I-IIIa SCLC. A predictive marker that combines the NLN count with the N stage and positive LN count could provide more prognostic information in SCLC.

The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung cancer surgery in Queensland

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic poses unprecedented challenges to global healthcare. The contemporary influence of COVID-19 on the delivery of lung cancer surgery has not been examined in Queensland.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective registry analysis of the Queensland Cardiac Outcomes Registry (QCOR), thoracic database examining all adult lung cancer resections across Queensland from 1/1/2016 to 30/4/2022. We compared the data prior to, and after, the introduction of COVID-restrictions.

RESULTS

There were 1207 patients. Mean age at surgery was 66 years and 1115 (92%) lobectomies were performed. We demonstrated a significant delay from time of diagnosis to surgery from 80 to 96 days (P < 0.0005), after introducing COVID-restrictions. The number of surgeries performed per month decreased after the pandemic and has not recovered (P = 0.012). 2022 saw a sharp reduction in cases with 49 surgeries, compared to 71 in 2019 for the same period.

CONCLUSION

Restrictions were associated with a significant increase in pathological upstaging, greatest immediately after the introduction of COVID-restrictions (IRR 1.71, CI 0.93-2.94, P = 0.05). COVID-19 delayed the access to surgery, reduced surgical capacity and consequently resulted in pathological upstaging throughout Queensland.

Pathological Stage N1 Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Can Benefit From Surgical Resection

PURPOSE

Surgery is controversial in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) (except for T1-2, N0M0). This study aimed to analyze the survival of LS-SCLC patients with proximal lobe (N1) lymph node metastases after surgery and appropriate postoperative adjuvant treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed and followed up medical history and survival data of LS-SCLC patients from June 2007 to June 2016, and a total of 68 pathological stage N1 (p-N1) patients who underwent surgical resection and 71 clinical-stage N1 (c-N1) patients who received chemoradiotherapy were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of all the patients was 99.30 months. The median disease-free survival (DFS) of the surgery group was 13.567 months, and the median overall survival (OS) of the surgery and chemoradiotherapy groups were 29.600 months and 21.133 months (P-value < .001), respectively. The 2- and 5-year survival rates of the surgery group were 55.9% and 33.7%, and the 2- and 5-year survival rates of the chemoradiotherapy group were 39.8% and 9.4%, respectively. Meanwhile, postoperative thoracic radiotherapy appeared to be associated with a good prognosis (median OS 36.400 vs. 21.333 months, P-value .048), as did prophylactic cranial irradiation (median OS 50.867 vs. 22.600 months, P-value .007) in the surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery may benefit patients with p-N1 SCLC, and in combination with appropriate postoperative adjuvant treatment, surgery may be a new therapeutic modality for SCLC.

Development and validation of nomogram prognostic model for early-stage T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer: A population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Survival outcomes of early-stage T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients differ widely, and the existing Veterans Administration Lung Study Group (VALSG) or TNM staging system is inefficient at predicting individual prognoses. In our study, we developed and validated nomograms for individually predicting overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) in this special subset of patients.

METHODS

Data on patients diagnosed with T1-2N0M0 SCLC between 2000 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All enrolled patients were split into a training cohort and a validation cohort according to the year of diagnosis. Using multivariable Cox regression, significant prognostic factors were identified and integrated to develop nomograms for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and LCSS prediction. The prognostic performance of our new model was measured by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. We compared our latest model and the 8th AJCC staging system using decision curve analyses (DCA). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were applied to test the application of the risk stratification system.

RESULTS

A total of 1,147 patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2011 were assigned to the training cohort, and 498 cases that were diagnosed from 2012 to 2015 comprised the validation cohort. Age, surgery, lymph node removal (LNR), and chemotherapy were independent predictors of LCSS. The variables of sex, age, surgery, LNR, and chemotherapy were identified as independent predictors of OS. The above-mentioned prognostic factors were entered into the nomogram construction of OS and LCSS. The C-index of this model in the training cohort was 0.663, 0.702, 0.733, and 0.658, 0.702, 0.733 for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and LCSS, respectively. Additionally, in the validation cohort, there were 0.706, 0.707, 0.718 and 0.712, 0.691, 0.692. The calibration curve showed accepted prediction accuracy between nomogram-predicted survival and actual observed survival, regardless of OS or LCSS. In addition, there were significant distinctions in the survival curves of OS and LCSS between different risk groups stratified by prognostic scores. Compared with the 8th AJCC staging system, our new model also improved net benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated novel nomograms for individual prediction of OS and LCSS, integrating the characteristics of patients and tumors. The model showed superior reliability and may help clinicians make treatment strategies and survival predictions for early-stage T1-2N0M0 SCLC patients.

Efficacy evaluation of surgery combined with chemotherapy for stage IIIA small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective analysis

Background

The efficacy of surgery in combination of chemotherapy for stage IIIA small cell lung cancer (IIIA-SCLC) is controversial. The aim of the present study was to analyze the efficacy of surgery combined with chemotherapy, especially in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery for IIIA-SCLC.

Methods

Between 2004 and 2015, we reviewed 2,199 chemotherapy-treated stage IIIA (N1/2) SCLC cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and 32 NAC + intentional radical resection-treated, centrally-located IIIA-SCLC cases at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (SPH). Outcomes were compared between surgically and non-surgically treated patients from the SEER database after propensity score matching (PSM), and comparing lobectomy/bi-lobectomy and pneumonectomy patients from SPH. Prognostic factors were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results

There was significantly higher overall survival (OS) in surgically treated IIIA-SCLC patients (OS, 44.8 vs. 21.2 months, P=0.048), and similar efficacy was observed between sub-lobectomy and lobectomy/bi-lobectomy patients (OS: 55.6 vs. 30.3 months, P=0.167) in SEER database. At SPH, significantly higher OS was associated with T1 stage (before NAC: T1 vs. T2-4, 48.7 vs. 32.2 months, P=0.025; after NAC: T1 vs. T2-4, 42.7 vs. 21.3 months, P=0.048). Female sex [hazard ratio (HR): 0.078, P=0.009], T1 stage (HR: 13.048, P=0.026), and pneumonectomy (HR: 0.095, P=0.009) were independent prognostic factors for IIIA-SCLC patients who received NAC + intentional radical resection.

Conclusions

For stage IIIA SCLC patients, complete resection combined with chemotherapy might improve the prognosis than patients without surgery. Post-NAC lobectomy was not found to be superior to sub-lobectomy, while pneumonectomy was considered suitable for central-type IIIA-SCLC patients after NAC treatment.

A systematic literature review of real-world treatment outcomes of small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Robust evidence from real-world studies is needed to aid decision-makers and other stakeholders in choosing the best treatment options for patients. The objective of this work was to assess real-world outcomes of treatment strategies for limited- and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) prior to the global introduction of immunotherapies for this disease.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles published in English from October 1, 2015, through May 20, 2020. Searches were designed using a combination of Medical Subject Heading (Medline), Emtree (Embase subject headings), and free-text terms such as SCLC. Observational studies reporting data on outcomes of initial treatment strategies in patients with limited- and extensive-stage SCLC were included. Studies with limited sample sizes (<100 patients), enrolled all patients prior to 2010, or did not report outcomes for limited- and extensive-stage SCLC separately were excluded. Data were extracted into a predesigned template by a single researcher. All extractions were validated by a second researcher, with disagreements resolved via consensus.

RESULTS

Forty articles were included in this review. Most enrolled patients from the United States (n = 18 articles) or China (n = 12 articles). Most examined limited-stage (n = 27 articles) SCLC. All studies examined overall survival as the primary outcome. Articles investigating limited-stage SCLC reported outcomes for surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and adjuvant prophylactic cranial irradiation. In studies examining multiple treatment strategies, chemoradiotherapy was the most commonly utilized therapy (56%-82%), with chemotherapy used in 18% to 44% of patients. Across studies, median overall survival was generally higher for chemoradiotherapy (15-45 months) compared with chemotherapy alone (6.0-15.6 months). Studies of extensive-stage SCLC primarily reported on chemotherapy alone, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy, and radiotherapy for patients presenting with brain metastases. Overall survival was generally lower for patients receiving chemotherapy alone (median: 6.4-16.5 months; 3 years, 5%-14.9%) compared with chemotherapy in combination with consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (median: 12.1-18.0 months; 3 years, 15.0%-18.1%). Studies examining whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases reported lower median overall survival (5.6-8.7 months) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (10.0-14.5 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Under current standard of care, which has remained relatively unchanged over the past few decades, prognosis remains poor for patients with SCLC.

Stage I and II Small-Cell Lung Cancer-New Challenge for Surgery

Purpose

The recommended treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) currently is surgery in stage I disease. We wondered about stage II SCLC and present a meta-analysis on mean-survival of patients that underwent surgery for stage I and II compared to controls.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on December 01st 2021 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. We considered studies published on the effect of surgery in SCLC since 2004 and assessed them using ROBINS-I. We preformed I²-tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests and Egger-regression. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA.

Results

Out of 6826 records, seven studies with a total of 11,241 patients (‘surgery group’: 3911 patients; ‘non-surgery group’: 7330; treatment period: 1984–2015) were included. Heterogeneity between the studies was revealed in absence of any publication bias. Patient characteristics did not differ between the groups (p-value > 0.05). The mean-survival in an analysis of patients in stage I was 36.7 ± 10.8 months for the ‘surgery group’ and 20.3 ± 5.7 months for the ‘non-surgery group’ (p-value = 0.0084). A combined analysis of patients in stage I and II revealed a mean-survival of 32.0 ± 16.7 months for the ‘surgery group’ and 19.1 ± 6.1 months for the ‘non-surgery group’ (p-value = 0.0391). In a separate analysis of stage II, we were able to demonstrate a significant survival benefit after surgery (21.4 ± 3.6 versus 16.2 ± 3.9 months; p-value = 0.0493).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis shows a significant survival benefit after surgery not only in the recommended stage I but also in stage II SCLC. Our data suggests that both stages should be considered for surgery of early SCLC.

New perspectives in the management of small cell lung cancer

The treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a challenge for all specialists involved. New treatments have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium in recent months, but efforts must continue to improve both survival and quality of life. Advances in surgery and radiotherapy have resulted in prolonged survival times and fewer complications, while more careful patient selection has led to increased staging accuracy. Developments in the field of systemic therapy have resulted in changes to clinical guidelines and the management of patients with advanced disease, mainly with the introduction of immunotherapy. In this article, we describe recent improvements in the management of patients with SCLC, review current treatments, and discuss future lines of research.

Prognostic significance of visceral pleural invasion in patients with surgically resected small-cell lung cancer: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

Visceral pleural invasion is an adverse prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer, but its value in small-cell lung cancer remains unclear. Thus, we investigated the prognostic impact of visceral pleural invasion in patients with surgically resected small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program database for patients diagnosed with stages I-III (excluding N3 and nodal metastasis cannot be evaluated (NX)) small-cell lung cancer from 2004 to 2016, who underwent surgery. To minimize unbalanced baseline characteristics between the visceral pleural invasion and non-visceral pleural invasion groups, one-to-one propensity score matching was employed. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to compare the overall survival of the two cohorts. A Cox proportional hazards model was adopted to determine the impact of visceral pleural invasion on survival.

RESULTS

Of the 1416 patients included, 372 (26.27%) presented with visceral pleural invasion. Patients with visceral pleural invasion showed significantly worse overall survival (P < 0.001) both before and after propensity score matching. Multivariable analysis indicated that visceral pleural invasion was an independent adverse factor affecting survival. Patients with visceral pleural invasion showed poorer overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.17-1.76; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that the non-visceral pleural invasion group was associated with favourable overall survival in N0 patients (P = 0.003) but not in N1 or N2 patients (P = 0.774 and 0.248, respectively). Patients diagnosed at younger ages, females, lower N stage, resection with a lobectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with improved overall survival in the visceral pleural invasion group.

CONCLUSIONS

Visceral pleural invasion was an indicator of a poor prognosis for small-cell lung cancer, especially in those with N0 disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves patient outcomes for patients with visceral pleural invasion.

Patterns of Recurrence and Survival Rate After Complete Resection of Pathological Stage N2 Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The benefits of surgical resection for patients with stage N2 limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) remain controversial. This retrospective study analyzed the survival and recurrence patterns of the patients diagnosed with pathological N2 (p-N2) LD-SCLC after radical resection. A total of 171 p-N2 LD-SCLC patients who underwent radical pulmonary resection and systematic lymphadenectomies at Shanghai Chest Hospital from July 2005 to June 2015 were enrolled. The influence of the mediastinal lymph node status (single or multiple nodes, single- or multiple-station) on the survival and recurrence patterns was retrospectively analyzed. The main recurrence sites were outside the chest cavity (54.8%) and hematogenous metastasis (67.4%). The bone and liver as initial recurrence sites had a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 13.100 months and 11.900 months, respectively. The median disease-free survival (DFS) of patients diagnosed with single and multiple p-N2 after surgery were 19.233 and 9.367 months (P = 0.001), and the median OS were 43.033 and 17.100 months (P < 0.001), respectively. In conclusion, recurrence occurred in the form of hematogenous metastasis mostly in the extra-thoracic part. Interestingly, patients diagnosed with single p-N2 benefited from radical resection. Surgery may be a treatment option regardless of the T stage if N2 SCLC with a single metastatic lymph node can be identified preoperatively.

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with surgically resected stage I-III small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of the SEER database

OBJECTIVES

Due to the lack of prospective studies, the role of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the prognostic effect of LNR in surgically resected stage I-III SCLC patients.

METHODS

Clinical data of stage I-III (excluding N3 and NX) SCLC patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk subsets based on the LNR cut-off value of 0.15 using X-tile software. Propensity score matching analysis was employed to reduce bias in baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of multiple variables.

RESULTS

A total of 978 patients were identified, of whom 669 (68.40%) had LNR ≤0.15. Patients with LNR ≤0.15 showed better OS (P < 0.001) and LCSS (P < 0.001) both before and after propensity score matching. Multivariable analyses of the matched population confirmed LNR as an independent prognostic factor. Patients with LNR >0.15 showed poorer OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-2.19; P = 0.015] and LCSS (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.43; P = 0.010). Subgroup analyses revealed that LNR ≤0.15 was associated with favourable OS (P = 0.009 and 0.197, respectively) and LCSS (P = 0.010 and 0.169, respectively) in N1 and N2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LNR was determined as an independent predictor for surgically resected stage I-III SCLC, indicating that higher LNR is associated with reduced survival. The predictive value of LNR should to be further validated in prospective studies.

Surgery Plus Chemotherapy Versus Surgery Alone for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Survival Outcome Analysis

Introduction

For patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), effective treatment methods still remain a clinical challenge. The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival outcome of surgery plus chemotherapy vs. surgery alone in patients with LS-SCLC.

Methods

LS-SCLC patients selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2015. Comparison of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between two groups performed propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW), and overlap weighting analysis.

Results

Of the 477 LS-SCLC patients identified from the SEER database between 2004 and 2015, 262 (54.9%) received surgery-plus-chemotherapy treatment and the others received surgery-alone treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that treatment option (P< 0.001), tumor location (P= 0.02) and AJCC stage (P< 0.001) were independent prognostic predictors of OS in LS-SCLC patients. Median OS was 35 months in surgery-plus-chemotherapy group vs. 23 months in surgery-alone group. Survival analysis showed that surgery plus chemotherapy offered significantly improved OS as compared with surgery-alone treatment before and after IPTW, PSM and overlap weighting method (all P< 0.05). According to AJCC stage stratification, OS of the unmatched patients with stage I (P= 0.049) and II (P= 0.001) SCLC who received surgery-plus-chemotherapy treatment was significantly better than that of surgery-alone patients.

Conclusions

This cohort study showed that surgery plus chemotherapy was associated with longer survival time than surgery alone in LS-SCLC patients, especially in those with stage I and II SCLC. Further prospective studies are required to confirm our conclusions.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram Prognostic Model for Resected Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background

In this study, we developed and validated nomograms for predicting the survival in surgically resected limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients.

Methods

The SCLC patients extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2000 and 2014 were reviewed. Significant prognostic factors were identified and integrated to develop the nomogram using multivariable Cox regression. The model was then validated internally by bootstrap resampling, and externally using an independent SCLC cohort diagnosed between 2000 and 2015 at our institution. The prognostic performance was measured by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve.

Results

A total of 1006 resected limited-stage SCLC patients were included in the training cohort. Overall, 444 cases from our institution constituted the validation cohort. Seven prognostic factors were identified and entered into the nomogram construction. The C-indexes of this model in the training cohort were 0.723, 0.722, and 0.746 for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS), respectively, and 0.816, 0.710, and 0.693, respectively, in the validation cohort. The calibration curve showed optimal agreement between nomogram-predicted survival and actual observed survival. Additionally, significant distinctions in survival curves between different risk groups stratified by prognostic scores were also observed. The proposed nomogram was then deployed into a website server for convenient application.

Conclusions

We developed and validated novel nomograms for individual prediction of survival for resected limited-stage SCLC patients. These models perform better than the previously widely used staging system and may offer clinicians instructions for strategy making and the design of clinical trials.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-09552-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The current role of surgery and SBRT in early stage of small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Early stage small cell lung cancer (T1-2N0M0SCLC) represents 7% of all SCLC. The standard treatment in patients with intrathoracic SCLC disease is the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Nowadays, the recommended management of this highly selected group is surgical resection due to favorable survival outcomes. For medically inoperable patients or those who refuse surgery, there is an increasing interest in evaluating the role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for T1-2N0SCLC, transferring the favorable experience obtained on inoperable NSCLC (Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer). In the era of multimodality treatment, adjuvant systemic therapy plays an important role even in the management of early SCLC, increasing the disease-free survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The benefit of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI), that currently has a Category I recommendation for localized stage SLCL, remains controversial in this selected subgroup of patients due to the lower risk of brain metastasis.

AIM

This review summarizes the most relevant data on the local management of T1-2N0M0SCLC (surgery and radiotherapy), and evaluates the relevance of adjuvant treatment.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Provides a critical evaluation of best current clinical management options for T1-2N0M0 SCLC.

The number of lymph nodes examined is associated with survival outcomes and nodal upstaging in patients with stage I small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE(S)

Lymph node status is vital for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We sought to evaluate the association between the number of lymph nodes examined (NLNE) and prognosis and nodal upstaging in stage I SCLC patients.

METHODS

We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and our department for surgically treated patients with pathologic stage I SCLC to evaluate the correlation between NLNE and overall survival (OS). We further investigated the association between the NLNE and nodal upstaging in clinical stage I SCLC.

RESULTS

A total of 878 patients with pathologic stage I SCLC were enrolled from the SEER database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that removing more than 6 lymph nodes was associated with significantly improved OS. We validated the prognostic impact from examining more than 6 nodes in pathologic stage I SCLC patients from our department. Logistic regression analysis found that removing more than 6 nodes increased the odds of nodal upstaging for clinical stage I SCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate nodal examination leads to survival benefits and accurate nodal staging. Our analysis indicated that examining more than 6 lymph nodes could confer better OS and predict nodal upstaging for stage I SCLC patients.

Benefits of surgery in the multimodality treatment of stage IIB-IIIC small cell lung cancer

Surgery combined with chemotherapy/radiotherapy is recommended for early stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, the role of surgery in the multimodality treatment of advanced disease remains controversial. The clinical data of patients between 2000 and 2015 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The surgery group included 998 patients with stage IIB-IIIC. A matched non-surgery group (n = 2994) was generated by propensity score matching. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used for survival analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify significant prognostic factors. After matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups in race, age, sex, T classification, N classification, TNM stage, marital status, primary sites, and origin record NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm (NHIA). The surgery group showed better overall survival and cancer-specific survival than the non-surgery group. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that therapy methods, age, sex, T classification, and N classification were independent prognostic predictors for stage IIB-IIIC SCLC (all P < 0.05). Stratified analyses showed that survival outcomes favored surgery in any age groups, men and women, any T classification except T3, and N0-2 but not N3 compared with non-surgical treatment. The survival differences favored surgery in stage IIB and IIIA SCLC, although they were not significant in stage IIB and IIIC SCLC. Therefore, surgery was associated with improved survival in stage IIB and IIIA SCLC, but not in stage IIIB and IIIC SCLC.

Cancer cell reprogramming: a promising therapy converting malignancy to benignity

In the past decade, remarkable progress has been made in reprogramming terminally differentiated somatic cells and cancer cells into induced pluripotent cells and cancer cells with benign phenotypes. Recent studies have explored various approaches to induce reprogramming from one cell type to another, including lineage-specific transcription factors-, combinatorial small molecules-, microRNAs- and embryonic microenvironment-derived exosome-mediated reprogramming. These reprogramming approaches have been proven to be technically feasible and versatile to enable re-activation of sequestered epigenetic regions, thus driving fate decisions of differentiated cells. One of the significant utilities of cancer cell reprogramming is the therapeutic potential of retrieving normal cell functions from various malignancies. However, there are several major obstacles to overcome in cancer cell reprogramming before clinical translation, including characterization of reprogramming mechanisms, improvement of reprogramming efficiency and safety, and development of delivery methods. Recently, several insights in reprogramming mechanism have been proposed, and determining progress has been achieved to promote reprogramming efficiency and feasibility, allowing it to emerge as a promising therapy against cancer in the near future. This review aims to discuss recent applications in cancer cell reprogramming, with a focus on the clinical significance and limitations of different reprogramming approaches, while summarizing vital roles played by transcription factors, small molecules, microRNAs and exosomes during the reprogramming process.

Role of surgery in patients with early stage small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

Currently, systemic chemotherapy combined with thoracic radiation is the standard treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the treatment of early stage SCLC remains controversial. This study evaluated the survival outcomes of surgical treatments and the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy on lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) in patients with early stage SCLC.

Methods

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry, we identified 2,453 patients with early stage SCLC (1,295 women and 1,158 men) who had complete clinical information between 2004 and 2015. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the propensity score based on the characteristics of patients with early stage SCLC. LCSS was compared between patients treated with surgery and non-surgery after adjusting, stratifying, or matching patients with early stage SCLC. In addition, we compared the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on LCSS in patients with early stage SCLC.

Results

Overall, 687 (28.0%) and 1,766 (72.0%) patients with early stage SCLC did and did not undergo surgery, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival curves between the surgery and non-surgery groups (log-rank p<0.001). Compared with the non-surgery group, the LCSS of the surgery group was better (hazard ratio [HR]:0.494, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.415-0.587, p<0.001) in patients with early stage SCLC when using a Cox model for multivariate analysis. There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.847) in LCSS between patients with early stage SCLC with and without chemotherapy in the multivariate analysis. Radiotherapy had favorable effects on LCSS (HR: 0.579, 95% CI: 0.500-0.671, p<0.001) in patients with early stage SCLC using multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Our study results suggest that LCSS conferred by surgery was higher than that conferred by non-surgery and that radiotherapy is associated with better survival in patients with early stage SCLC. This study findings should be confirmed in prospective studies.

The role of surgery in stage I to III small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The role of surgery in treating small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether surgical-based treatment improves survival in comparison to radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy for stage I to III SCLC.

Methods

PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. The main outcome were overall survival (OS), reported as hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Two randomized control trials (RCTs) and 13 retrospective studies that included a total of 41,483 patients were eligible. Surgical resection significantly improved OS when compared to non-surgical treatment in retrospective studies (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.49–0.64, P < 0.001), but not in the 2 “older” RCTs (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.32–1.84, P = 0.55). In the subgroup analysis for retrospective studies, surgical resection was associated with superior OS in stage I (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.49–0.64, P < 0.001), stage II (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57–0.99, P = 0.04), and stage III diseases (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56–0.88, P = 0.002). Sublobar resection resulted in worse OS than a lobectomy (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.56–0.74, P < 0.001) for patients undergoing surgical resection.

Conclusions

Surgery-based multi-modality treatment appears to be associated with a favorable survival advantage in stage I and selected stage II to III SCLC. Lobectomy is likely to provide superior OS when compared to sublobar resection. Further prospective RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.