1
|
Tan JY, Yeo YH, Tan MC, Chavez JC, Chisti MM. Mortality trends of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the United States with the emergence of targeted therapy. Br J Haematol 2024; 204:1114-1117. [PMID: 38155366 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Yi Tan
- Department of Internal Medicine, New York Medical College at Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Yong-Hao Yeo
- Department of Internal Medicine/Pediatrics, Corewell Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Min Choon Tan
- Department of Internal Medicine, New York Medical College at Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Julio C Chavez
- Department of Hematologic Malignancies, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Mohammad Muhsin Chisti
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bermudez Y, Scott L, Miller J, DeGroff A, Beckman M. Are National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program Recipients Providing Services in Counties Heavily Burdened by Breast and Cervical Cancer? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:188. [PMID: 38397679 PMCID: PMC10887905 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21020188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Alignment of National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) clinical services with the spatial distribution of breast and cervical cancer burden is essential to maximizing programmatic impact and addressing cancer disparities. This study identified spatial clustering of breast and cervical cancer burden scores and assessed whether and to what extent NBCCEDP clinical services were associated with clusters for the 5-year period, 2015-2019. METHODS We examined burden scores for spatial clustering using Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) tests in GeoDA. We then used t-tests to compare the NBCCEDP 5-year average percentage of eligible women served clinical breast and cervical cancer services between hotspot (high burden) and coolspot clusters. RESULTS There was statistically significant spatial clustering in the pattern of breast and cervical cancer burden scores across counties, with hotspot clusters mostly observed in the Southern region, Idaho and Nevada. For both breast and cervical cancer, higher percentages of eligible women received breast and cervical cancer clinical services in coolspot clusters compared to hotspot clusters during each year from 2015-2019. CONCLUSION NBCCEDP clinical services can help reduce breast and cervical cancer burden. Yet, during 2015-2019, increased service delivery was not aligned with the spatial distribution of counties with greater breast and cervical cancer burdens. NBCCEDP recipients may improve their impact on breast and cervical cancer burden by prioritizing and consistently increasing service delivery in cancer burden hotspot clusters if they have not already maximized their resources in these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yamisha Bermudez
- Totally Joined for Achieving Collaborative Techniques, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
| | - Lia Scott
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
| | - Jacqueline Miller
- Program Services Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Amy DeGroff
- Program Services Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| | - Michele Beckman
- Program Services Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu Z, Kuo YF, Giordano SH. Disparities in screening mammography utilization among Hispanic women in rural Texas from 2002 to 2018. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:963-971. [PMID: 37354321 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01738-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the trends of racial/ethnic and urban-rural disparities in screening mammography use with a focus on Hispanic women in rural Texas, as well as to further investigate barriers to mammography screening practices. METHODS A serial cross-sectional study was conducted on screening mammography including eligible female respondents (≥ 40 years) from the Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey from 2002 to 2018. FINDINGS Weighted descriptive analyses showed persistent racial/ethnic and urban-rural disparities in mammography screening rates among eligible women (≥ 40 years) in Texas. Overall, the mammography screening rates for women in rural areas were significantly lower than women in urban areas with a mean rate of 64.09% versus 70.89% (p < 0.001). Rural Hispanic women had the lowest mean mammography screening rate (55.98%) among all eligible women which is 16.27% below the mean mammography screening rate of non-Hispanic white women in urban areas. Weighted logistic regression model revealed that women with no health insurance or primary care providers were 52% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.36-0.63, p < 0.001) or 54% (95% CI 0.35-0.6, p < 0.001) less likely having an up-to-date mammography screening compared with women with health insurance or primary care providers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated significant and persistent racial and urban-rural disparities in screening mammography utilization among Hispanic women compared with non-Hispanic white women from 2002 to 2018. Healthcare access is a major contributor to these disparities. It highlights the need for wide-scale interventions from public health and policymakers targeting under screened racial minorities and rural regions population to promote screening mammography services among disadvantaged population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoli Liu
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, The University of Texas at Arlington, 411 S. Nedderman Drive, Box 19407, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
| | - Yong-Fang Kuo
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agunwamba AA, Zhu X, Sauver JS, Thompson G, Helmueller L, Finney Rutten LJ. Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening using the 5As framework: A systematic review of US studies. Prev Med Rep 2023; 35:102353. [PMID: 37576848 PMCID: PMC10415795 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite clear evidence that regular screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and the availability of multiple effective screening options, CRC screening continues to be underutilized in the US. A systematic literature search of four databases - Ovid, Medline, EBSCHOhost, and Web of Science - was conducted to identify US studies published after 2017 that reported on barriers and facilitators to CRC screening adherence. Articles were extracted to categorize relevant CRC screening barriers or facilitators that were assessed against CRC screening outcomes using the 5As dimensions: Access, Affordability, Acceptance, Awareness, Activation. Sixty-one studies were included. Fifty determinants of screening within the 5As framework and two additional dimensions including Sociodemographics and Health Status were identified. The Sociodemographics, Access, and Affordability dimensions had the greatest number of studies included. The most common factor in the Access dimension was contact with healthcare systems, within the Affordability dimension was insurance, within the Awareness dimension was knowledge CRC screening, within the Acceptance dimension was health beliefs, within the Activation dimension was prompts and reminders, within the Sociodemographics dimension was race/ethnicity, and among the Health Status dimension was chronic disease history. Among all studies, contact with healthcare systems, insurance, race/ethnicity, age, and education were the most common factors identified. CRC screening barriers and facilitators were identified across individual, clinical, and sociocontextual levels. Interventions that consider multilevel strategies will most effectively increase CRC screening adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amenah A. Agunwamba
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Xuan Zhu
- Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jenny St. Sauver
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Lila J. Finney Rutten
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quinn M, Wright N, Scherdt M, Barton DL, Titler M, Armin JS, Naughton MJ, Wenzel J, Percac-Lima S, Mishra P, Danner SM, Friese CR. A descriptive study of policy and system-level interventions to address cancer survivorship issues across six United States health systems. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01440-y. [PMID: 37544977 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01440-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe policy and system-level interventions with potential to improve cancer care at six sites. METHODS In 2016, six institutions received foundation support to develop unique multi-component interventions aimed at improving cancer care for underserved populations. These organizations, located across the United States, participated in a cross-site evaluation to assess the overall initiative impact and to identify potentially promising policy and system-level solutions for dissemination and broader implementation. A health system and policy tracking tool was developed to collect data from each site and included a description of their efforts, strategies employed, and changes achieved (e.g., new policies, clinical protocols). Tracking tool data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analyses and a matrix approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with site leaders (N = 65) and were analyzed by thematic analysis. RESULTS Sites reported 20 system and policy efforts, which resulted in improvements to electronic health records and telehealth strategies, changes to hospital/health system policies, and standardized clinical protocols/guidelines, among others. Efforts were aimed at: (1) coordinating care across multiple providers, supported by patient navigators; (2) expanding psychosocial and supportive care; (3) improving patient-provider communication; and (4) addressing barriers to accessing care. Interview analyses provided insights into successful strategies, challenges, and implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, cancer care remains inequitable. System-level improvements aimed at eliminating common barriers faced by underserved populations offer opportunities to improve the delivery of equitable, effective, and efficient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Quinn
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Nathan Wright
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Marylee Scherdt
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Debra L Barton
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Marita Titler
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Julie S Armin
- College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85711, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Wenzel
- Schools of Nursing and Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | | | | | - Sankirtana M Danner
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Christopher R Friese
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Watanabe J, Kotani K. Possible relationship between rural surgical rotations during a residency period and an increased number of general surgeons in rural areas: a systematic review. J Rural Med 2023; 18:1-7. [PMID: 36700129 PMCID: PMC9832310 DOI: 10.2185/jrm.2022-031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Rural surgical training for residents is expected to increase the number of general surgeons working in rural areas; however, the impact of rural training programs to ensure such surgeons remains to be determined. Therefore, we reviewed the relevance of rural surgical rotation to the increase of general surgeons in rural areas. Materials and Methods: Studies on the outcomes of rural surgical rotations during the residency period in comparison to non-rural surgical rotations were retrieved using electronic databases through April 2022. Results: Among the 514 articles, five were eligible for review. All studies were published in the United States. Four studies reported an increased number of general surgeons in rural areas owing to rural surgical rotations. A meta-analysis of all studies showed a positive impact on the number of general surgeons in rural areas (odds ratio=2.19, 95% confidence interval=1.23-3.91). The programs generally ranged from 2 to 12 months with extensive experience with minor surgery and subspecialties necessary for surgery. Conclusions: Rural surgical rotations during the residency period can increase the number of general surgeons working in rural areas. Further studies are needed to evaluate the placement of general surgeons in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Watanabe
- Division of Community and Family Medicine, Jichi Medical
University, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Kotani
- Division of Community and Family Medicine, Jichi Medical
University, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Purpose of Review Population aging is occurring worldwide, particularly in developed countries such as the United States (US). However, in the US, the population is aging more rapidly in rural areas than in urban areas. Healthy aging in rural areas presents unique challenges. Understanding and addressing those challenges is essential to ensure healthy aging and promote health equity across the lifespan and all geographies. This review aims to present findings and evaluate recent literature (2019-2022) on rural aging and highlight future directions and opportunities to improve population health in rural communities. Recent Findings The review first addresses several methodological considerations in measuring rurality, including the choice of measure used, the composition of each measure, and the limitations and drawbacks of each measure. Next, the review considers important concepts and context when describing what it means to be rural, including social, cultural, economic, and environmental conditions. The review assesses several key epidemiologic studies addressing rural-urban differences in population health among older adults. Health and social services in rural areas are then discussed in the context of healthy aging in rural areas. Racial and ethnic minorities, indigenous peoples, and informal caregivers are considered as special populations in the discussion of rural older adults and healthy aging. Lastly, the review provides evidence to support critical longitudinal, place-based research to promote healthy aging across the rural-urban divide is highlighted. Summary Policies, programs, and interventions to reduce rural-urban differences in population health and to promote health equity and healthy aging necessitate a context-specific approach. Considering the cultural context and root causes of rural-urban differences in population health and healthy aging is essential to support the real-world effectiveness of such programs, policies, and interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A. Cohen
- Department of Health Studies, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI USA
| | - Mary L. Greaney
- Department of Health Studies, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
DelNero PF, Buller ID, Jones RR, Tatalovich Z, Vanderpool RC, Ciolino HP, Croyle RT. A National Map of NCI-Designated Cancer Center Catchment Areas on the 50th Anniversary of the Cancer Centers Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022; 31:965-971. [PMID: 35101903 PMCID: PMC9074106 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-1230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 1971, the National Cancer Act created a process to recognize the leadership, facilities, and research efforts at cancer centers throughout the United States. Toward this goal, each NCI-designated cancer center defines and describes a catchment area to which they tailor specific scientific and community engagement activities. METHODS The geographically defined catchment areas of 63 NCI-designated comprehensive and clinical cancer centers are collated and presented visually. In addition, the NCI-designated cancer center catchment areas are geographically linked with publicly available data sources to aggregate sociodemographic and epidemiologic characteristics across the NCI Cancer Centers Program. RESULTS The national map portrays the size, shape, and locations for 63 catchment areas of the 71 NCI-designated cancer centers. The findings illustrate the geographic extent of the NCI Cancer Centers Program during the 50th anniversary of the National Cancer Act. CONCLUSIONS NCI-designated cancer centers occupy a prominent role in the cancer control ecosystem and continue to perform research to address the burden of cancer among their local communities. The strength of the NCI Cancer Centers Program is partly defined by the scope, quality, and impact of community outreach and engagement activities in the catchment areas. IMPACT The collation and geographic presentation of the distinct, but complementary, NCI-designated cancer center catchment areas are intended to support future research and community outreach activities among NCI-designated cancer centers. See related commentary by Vadaparampil and Tiro, p. 952.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter F. DelNero
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
- Implementation Science, Office of the Director, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Ian D. Buller
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
- Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Rena R. Jones
- Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Zaria Tatalovich
- Statistical Research & Applications Branch, Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Robin C. Vanderpool
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Henry P. Ciolino
- Office of Cancer Centers, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Robert T. Croyle
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cancer healthcare disparities among African Americans in the United States. J Natl Med Assoc 2022; 114:236-250. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
10
|
Urakawa T, Saitsu A, Watanabe J, Kotani K. Rural-urban difference in colorectal cancer mortality. J Cancer 2021; 12:3391-3392. [PMID: 33976748 PMCID: PMC8100804 DOI: 10.7150/jca.59434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoya Urakawa
- Division of Community and Family Medicine, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-City, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Akihiro Saitsu
- Division of Community and Family Medicine, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-City, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Jun Watanabe
- Division of Community and Family Medicine, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-City, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Kotani
- Division of Community and Family Medicine, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke-City, Tochigi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aly S, Daniel CL, Bae S, Scarinci IC, Hardy CM, Fouad MN, Baskin ML, Hoenemeyer T, Acemgil A, Demark-Wahnefried W. Cancer-related Beliefs and Preventive Health Practices among Residents of Rural versus Urban Counties in Alabama. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2021; 14:593-602. [PMID: 33526429 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Higher prevalence of cancer-related risk factors, for example, tobacco use, obesity, poor diet, and physical inactivity, is observed in the U.S. Deep South and likely contributes to its increased cancer burden. While this region is largely rural, it is unknown whether cancer-related beliefs and lifestyle practices differ by rural-urban status or are more influenced by other factors. We contacted 5,633 Alabamians to complete a cross-sectional survey to discern cancer-related beliefs and lifestyle practices, and compared data from respondents residing in rural- versus urban-designated counties. Findings were summarized using descriptive statistics; rural-urban subgroups were compared using two-tailed, χ 2 and t tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore associations by rural-urban status and other sociodemographic factors. Surveys were completed by 671 rural- and 183 urban-county respondents (15.2% response rate). Overall, the prevalence for overweight and obesity (77.8%) and sugar-sweetened beverage intake (273-364 calories/day) was higher than national levels. Most respondents (58%) endorsed raising the state tobacco tax. Respondents from rural- versus urban-designated counties were significantly more likely to be racial/ethnic minority, have lower education, employment, income, food security, and internet access, and endorse fatalistic cancer-related beliefs (<0.05; although regression models suggested that cancer belief differences are more strongly associated with education than counties of residence). Lifestyle practices were similar among rural-urban subgroups. Few rural-urban differences in cancer-related beliefs and lifestyle practices were found among survey respondents, although the high overall prevalence of fatalistic health beliefs and suboptimal lifestyle behaviors suggests a need for statewide cancer prevention campaigns and policies, including increased tobacco taxation.Prevention Relevance: Cancer incidence and mortality are higher in the U.S. Deep South, likely due to increased tobacco-use, obesity, poor diet, and physical inactivity. This study explores whether cancer-related beliefs and lifestyle practices differ by rural-urban status or other sociodemographic factors in a random sample of 855 residents across Alabama.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Aly
- Department of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Casey L Daniel
- University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, Alabama
| | - Sejong Bae
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Isabel C Scarinci
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Claudia M Hardy
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Mona N Fouad
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Monica L Baskin
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Teri Hoenemeyer
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Aras Acemgil
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama.
| |
Collapse
|