Effects of long-term sulindac therapy on colonic polyposis

Big data approach in the field of gastric and colorectal cancer research

Big data is characterized by three attributes: volume, variety,, and velocity. In healthcare setting, big data refers to vast dataset that is electronically stored and managed in an automated manner and has the potential to enhance human health and healthcare system. In this review, gastric cancer (GC) and postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) will be used to illustrate application of big data approach in the field of gastrointestinal cancer research. Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication only reduces GC risk by 46% due to preexisting precancerous lesions. Apart from endoscopy surveillance, identifying medications that modify GC risk is another strategy. Population-based cohort studies showed that long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) associated with higher GC risk after HP eradication, while aspirin and statins associated with lower risk. While diabetes mellitus conferred 73% higher GC risk, metformin use associated with 51% lower risk, effect of which was independent of glycemic control. Nonetheless, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NA-NSAIDs) are not associated with lower GC risk. CRC can still occur after initial colonoscopy in which no cancer was detected (i.e. PCCRC). Between 2005 and 2013, the rate of interval-type PCCRC-3y (defined as CRC diagnosed between 6 and 36 months of index colonoscopy which was negative for CRC) was 7.9% in Hong Kong, with >80% being distal cancers and higher cancer-specific mortality compared with detected CRC. Certain clinical and endoscopy-related factors were associated with PCCRC-3 risk. Medications shown to have chemopreventive effects on PCCRC include statins, NA-NSAIDs, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers.

Chemoprevention in hereditary digestive neoplasia: A comprehensive review

Hereditary syndromes, such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), MUTYH polyposis or Lynch syndrome, are particularly predisposing to the development of colorectal cancer. These situations have necessitated the development of adapted prevention strategies based largely on reinforced endoscopic surveillance and the search for complementary prevention strategies. This is the case for chemoprevention, which is the long-term administration of chemical agents limiting carcinogenesis, used as primary or secondary prophylaxis. The aim of this review is to present the available literature and the latest advances in chemoprevention in patients with FAP or MUTYH and other polyposis as well as in patients with Lynch syndrome. The main conclusions of the few available guidelines in these situations are also discussed.

Beneficial insights into postbiotics against colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent and life-threatening cancer types with limited therapeutic options worldwide. Gut microbiota has been recognized as the pivotal determinant in maintaining gastrointestinal (GI) tract homeostasis, while dysbiosis of gut microbiota contributes to CRC development. Recently, the beneficial role of postbiotics, a new concept in describing microorganism derived substances, in CRC has been uncovered by various studies. However, a comprehensive characterization of the molecular identity, mechanism of action, or routes of administration of postbiotics, particularly their role in CRC, is still lacking. In this review, we outline the current state of research toward the beneficial effects of gut microbiota derived postbiotics against CRC, which will represent the key elements of future precision-medicine approaches in the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting gut microbiota to improve treatment outcomes in CRC.

Long-term chemoprevention in patients with adenomatous polyposis coli: an observational study

Prospective short-term studies on effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) point towards a decrease in the number and size of polyps. Effectiveness and safety in the prevention of progression in familial polyposis with NSAIDs in long-term use, which is the prerequisite for therapeutic evaluation in prospective studies, is unknown. The total absolute observation period of 54 patients under sulindac was 399 patient years with a mean of 7.4 (2-19) years per patient. 36 patients (66.7%) showed a fast decrease of polyp burden, 8 (14.8%) were slow responders, and 9 (16.7%) had stable disease; one patient had a slow progression. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) polyp burden remained stable in 47% patients, increased in 31%, and improved in 22%. Advanced adenomas were found in 8 patients only within the first 5 years of chemoprevention, no patient developed desmoid disease, anamnestically evaluated on every follow-up. There were no life-threatening side-effects. Dosage and delivery pattern were essential for effectiveness. This study provides evidence that chemoprevention with sulindac is effective and safe and can, either alone or in combination with other drugs, become a long-term management option in cases of adenomatous polyposis. These results justify further long-term prospective chemoprevention studies to elaborate treatment protocols and guidelines.

Colorectal Carcinoma, Cyclooxygenases, and COX Inhibitors

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the most common of gastrointestinal cancers, the majority presenting with sporadic occurrence compared to the less frequently inherited syndromes. The increasing incidence, decreasing gender and age disparities, and the prevalent risk factors are concerning. The malignancy arising from benign precursor polyps transforms slowly over time. The adenoma variant polyps reported a marked upregulation of cyclooxygenases (COX), significantly COX-2 isoform, influenced by various determinants such as genetics, pathology, histology, and site of the carcinoma. These COX enzymes are responsible for prostaglandin synthesis and the consequent cascade of cell inflammation and proliferation. Therefore, COX inhibition by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) targeted against both the isoforms COX-1 and COX-2 have been studied for decades in anticipation of preventing the occurrence of colorectal carcinoma in high-risk populations. This article has collated and highlighted the overexpression of COX enzymes by the adenomatous polyps and provides corroborating evidence from multiple studies in favor of COX inhibition by NSAIDs. Aspirin and Sulindac were two drugs to be initially proven to halt the progression and cause regression of the polyps. Celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor besides NSAIDs, was also used in experimental studies.

A Comprehensive Overview of Colon Cancer- A Grim Reaper of the 21st Century

A few decades ago, the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) was low and is now the fourth in the list of deadly cancers producing nearly a million deaths annually. A population that is aging along with risk factors such as smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyle with little or no physical activity, and non-healthy food habits of developed countries can increase the risk of colorectal cancer. The balance in gut microbiota and the metabolites produced during bacterial fermentation within the host plays a significant role in regulating intestinal diseases as well as colorectal cancer development. Recent progress in the understanding of illness resulted in multiple treatment options such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, including targeted therapy and multitherapies. The treatment plan for CRC depends on the location, stage and grade of cancer as well as genomic biomarker tests. Despite all the advancements made in the genetic and molecular aspects of the disease, the knowledge seems inadequate as the drug action as well as the wide variation in drug response did not appear strongly correlated with the individual molecular and genetic characteristics, which suggests the requirement of comprehensive molecular understanding of this complex heterogeneous disease. Furthermore, multitherapies or a broad spectrum approach, which is an amalgamation of the various promising as well as effective therapeutic strategies that can tackle heterogeneity and act on several targets of the disease, need to be validated in clinical studies. The latest treatment options have significantly increased the survival of up to three years in the case of advanced disease. The fact that colorectal cancer is developed from a polypoid precursor, as well as the symptoms of the disease that occur at an advanced stage, underlines how screening programs can help early detection and decrease mortality as well as morbidity from CRC.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs but not aspirin are associated with a lower risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, their role in preventing post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC) remains undetermined.

AIMS

To investigate whether NSAIDs reduce PCCRC risk after a negative baseline colonoscopy METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study based on a territory-wide healthcare database of Hong Kong. All patients (aged 40 or above) who underwent colonoscopies between 2005 and 2013 were identified. Exclusion criteria included CRC detected within 6 months of index colonoscopy, prior CRC, inflammatory bowel disease and prior colectomy. The primary outcome was PCCRC-3y diagnosed between 6 and 36 months after index colonoscopy. Sites of CRC were categorised as proximal (proximal to splenic flexure) and distal. The adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) of PCCRC-3y with NSAID and aspirin use (defined as cumulative use for ≥90 days within 5 years before index colonoscopy) was derived by propensity score (PS) regression adjustment of 22 covariates (including patient factors, concurrent medication use and endoscopy centre's performance).

RESULTS

Of 187 897 eligible patients, 21 757 (11.6%) were NSAID users. 854 (0.45%) developed PCCRC-3y (proximal cancer: 147 [17.2%]). NSAIDs were associated with a lower PCCRC-3y risk (aHR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41-0.70), but not CRC that developed >3 years (aHR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-1.09). The aHR was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.24-0.95) for proximal and 0.55 (95% CI: 0.40-0.74) for distal cancer. A duration- and frequency response relationship was observed (P_trend  < 0.001). For aspirin, the aHR was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.80-1.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-aspirin NSAIDs were associated with lower PCCRC risk after a negative baseline colonoscopy.

Children's International Polyposis (CHIP) study: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of celecoxib in children with familial adenomatous polyposis

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of celecoxib versus placebo in the prevention and treatment of colorectal polyposis in children with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

Methods

In this Phase III, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial patients aged 10–17 years with FAP were randomized to celecoxib (16 mg/kg/day) or placebo for up to 5 years. Patients underwent annual assessments, including colonoscopies, to detect the time from randomization to the earliest occurrence of ≥20 polyps (>2 mm in size) or colorectal malignancy. The study was terminated early due to low rate of observed endpoints combined with a lower than expected enrollment rate. Descriptive results are provided.

Results

Of 106 randomized patients, 55 were treated with celecoxib (mean age 12.6 years; 52.7% female) and 51 were given placebo (mean age 12.2 years; 54.9% female). Disease progression (≥20 polyps, >2 mm in size) was observed in seven (12.7%) and 13 (25.5%) patients, respectively. The median time to disease progression was 2.1 years in the celecoxib group and 1.1 years for placebo. No patient developed colorectal cancer. The rate of adverse events (AEs) was similar in both groups (75.5% and 72.9%, respectively). Three patients in the celecoxib group (none in the placebo group) experienced serious AEs.

Conclusion

In children with FAP, celecoxib was a well-tolerated treatment that was associated with a lower rate of colorectal polyposis and a longer time to disease progression compared with placebo. Due to the low rate of observed endpoints, the long-term impact of these results could not be ascertained.

Colorectal Carcinoma: A General Overview and Future Perspectives in Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death. Most cases of CRC are detected in Western countries, with its incidence increasing year by year. The probability of suffering from colorectal cancer is about 4%–5% and the risk for developing CRC is associated with personal features or habits such as age, chronic disease history and lifestyle. In this context, the gut microbiota has a relevant role, and dysbiosis situations can induce colonic carcinogenesis through a chronic inflammation mechanism. Some of the bacteria responsible for this multiphase process include Fusobacterium spp, Bacteroides fragilis and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. CRC is caused by mutations that target oncogenes, tumour suppressor genes and genes related to DNA repair mechanisms. Depending on the origin of the mutation, colorectal carcinomas can be classified as sporadic (70%); inherited (5%) and familial (25%). The pathogenic mechanisms leading to this situation can be included in three types, namely chromosomal instability (CIN), microsatellite instability (MSI) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Within these types of CRC, common mutations, chromosomal changes and translocations have been reported to affect important pathways (WNT, MAPK/PI3K, TGF-β, TP53), and mutations; in particular, genes such as c-MYC, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PTEN, SMAD2 and SMAD4 can be used as predictive markers for patient outcome. In addition to gene mutations, alterations in ncRNAs, such as lncRNA or miRNA, can also contribute to different steps of the carcinogenesis process and have a predictive value when used as biomarkers. In consequence, different panels of genes and mRNA are being developed to improve prognosis and treatment selection. The choice of first-line treatment in CRC follows a multimodal approach based on tumour-related characteristics and usually comprises surgical resection followed by chemotherapy combined with monoclonal antibodies or proteins against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth receptor (EGFR). Besides traditional chemotherapy, alternative therapies (such as agarose tumour macrobeads, anti-inflammatory drugs, probiotics, and gold-based drugs) are currently being studied to increase treatment effectiveness and reduce side effects.

Use of NSAIDs for the Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE:

To discuss the role of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer.

DATA SOURCES:

A MEDLINE search (1966–May 2003) was performed to identify key literature. Search items included, but were not limited to, NSAIDs, colorectal cancer, chemoprevention, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)–specific inhibitors, and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:

The search included experimental (in vitro and animal models) and clinical studies evaluating the use of NSAIDs for the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. The MEDLINE search was supplemented by references from selected articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Numerous experimental, epidemiologic, and clinical studies suggest that NSAIDs have promise as anticancer agents. The mechanism by which NSAIDs lead to decreased colon carcinogenesis is not fully understood, but may involve restoration of apoptosis and inhibition of prostaglandin-mediated angiogenesis. Compelling evidence from many observational studies has consistently documented a 40–50% reduction in the risk of adenomatous polyps, colorectal cancer incidence, and mortality in patients using NSAIDs. Recent randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated a benefit with aspirin in reducing the rate of development of new or recurrent adenomas in high-risk patients. In addition, randomized studies using sulindac and celecoxib in patients with FAP have documented significant regression of existing adenomatous polyps.

CONCLUSIONS:

Inhibition of COX-2 is an example of a targeted approach to the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. However, controversy exists about the safety, efficacy, and optimal treatment regimen of NSAIDs as long-term chemopreventive agents in the general population. Ongoing studies in high-risk patients with both selective and nonselective COX inhibitors will provide important information in the area of colorectal chemoprevention, but clinical trials' use of adenomas as surrogate markers for chemoprevention trials makes their application to the general population limited.

Eicosanoid pathway in colorectal cancer: Recent updates

Enzymatic metabolism of the 20C polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) arachidonic acid (AA) occurs via the cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LOX) pathways, and leads to the production of various bioactive lipids termed eicosanoids. These eicosanoids have a variety of functions, including stimulation of homeostatic responses in the cardiovascular system, induction and resolution of inflammation, and modulation of immune responses against diseases associated with chronic inflammation, such as cancer. Because chronic inflammation is essential for the development of colorectal cancer (CRC), it is not surprising that many eicosanoids are implicated in CRC. Oftentimes, these autacoids work in an antagonistic and highly temporal manner in inflammation; therefore, inhibition of the pro-inflammatory COX-2 or 5-LOX enzymes may subsequently inhibit the formation of their essential products, or shunt substrates from one pathway to another, leading to undesirable side-effects. A better understanding of these different enzymes and their products is essential not only for understanding the importance of eicosanoids, but also for designing more effective drugs that solely target the inflammatory molecules found in both chronic inflammation and cancer. In this review, we have evaluated the cancer promoting and anti-cancer roles of different eicosanoids in CRC, and highlighted the most recent literature which describes how those molecules affect not only tumor tissue, but also the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, we have attempted to delineate the roles that eicosanoids with opposing functions play in neoplastic transformation in CRC through their effects on proliferation, apoptosis, motility, metastasis, and angiogenesis.

The role of inflammation in colon cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the world. CRC is responsible for more than 600,000 deaths annually and incidence rates are increasing in most of the developing countries. Epidemiological and laboratory investigations suggest that environmental factors such as western style dietary habits, tobacco-smoking, and lack of physical activities are considered as risks for CRC. Molecular pathobiology of CRC implicates pro-inflammatory conditions to promote the tumor malignant progression, invasion, and metastasis. It is well known that patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at higher risk of CRC. Many evidences exist reiterating the link between Inflammation and CRC. Inflammation involves interaction between various immune cells, inflammatory cells, chemokines, cytokines, and pro-inflammatory mediators, such as cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LOX) pathways, which may lead to signaling towards, tumor cell proliferation, growth, and invasion. Thus, this review will focus on mechanisms by which pro-inflammatory mediators and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species play a role in promoting CRC. Based on these mechanisms, various preventive strategies, involving anti-inflammatory agents, such as COX inhibitors, COX-LOX inhibitors, iNOS inhibitors, natural supplements/agents, and synthetic agents, that blocks the inflammatory pathways and suppress CRC are discussed in this review.

eRapa restores a normal life span in a FAP mouse model

Mutation of a single copy of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene results in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), which confers an extremely high risk for colon cancer. Apc(Min/+) mice exhibit multiple intestinal neoplasia (MIN) that causes anemia and death from bleeding by 6 months. Mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) inhibitors were shown to improve Apc(Min/+) mouse survival when administered by oral gavage or added directly to the chow, but these mice still died from neoplasia well short of a natural life span. The National Institute of Aging Intervention Testing Program showed that enterically targeted rapamycin (eRapa) extended life span for wild-type genetically heterogeneous mice in part by inhibiting age-associated cancer. We hypothesized that eRapa would be effective in preventing neoplasia and extend survival of Apc(Min/+) mice. We show that eRapa improved survival of Apc(Min/+) mice in a dose-dependent manner. Remarkably, and in contrast to previous reports, most of the Apc(Min/+) mice fed 42 parts per million eRapa lived beyond the median life span reported for wild-type syngeneic mice. Furthermore, chronic eRapa did not cause detrimental immune effects in mouse models of cancer, infection, or autoimmunity, thus assuaging concerns that chronic rapamycin treatment suppresses immunity. Our studies suggest that a novel formulation (enteric targeting) of a well-known and widely used drug (rapamycin) can dramatically improve its efficacy in targeted settings. eRapa or other mTORC1 inhibitors could serve as effective cancer preventatives for people with FAP without suppressing the immune system, thus reducing the dependency on surgery as standard therapy.

Sulindac selectively inhibits colon tumor cell growth by activating the cGMP/PKG pathway to suppress Wnt/β-catenin signaling

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) display promising antineoplastic activity for colorectal and other cancers, but toxicity from COX inhibition limits their long-term use for chemoprevention. Previous studies have concluded that the basis for their tumor cell growth inhibitory activity does not require COX inhibition, although the underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Here, we report that the NSAID sulindac sulfide inhibits cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate phosphodiesterase (cGMP PDE) activity to increase intracellular cGMP levels and activate cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) at concentrations that inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of colon tumor cells. Sulindac sulfide did not activate the cGMP/PKG pathway, nor affect proliferation or apoptosis in normal colonocytes. Knockdown of the cGMP-specific PDE5 isozyme by siRNA and PDE5-specific inhibitors tadalafil and sildenafil also selectively inhibited the growth of colon tumor cells that expressed high levels of PDE5 compared with colonocytes. The mechanism by which sulindac sulfide and the cGMP/PKG pathway inhibits colon tumor cell growth involves the transcriptional suppression of β-catenin to inhibit Wnt/β-catenin T-cell factor transcriptional activity, leading to downregulation of cyclin D1 and survivin. These observations suggest that safer and more efficacious sulindac derivatives can be developed for colorectal cancer chemoprevention by targeting PDE5 and possibly other cGMP-degrading isozymes.

Chemoprevention in familial adenomatous polyposis

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) predictably leads to adenomas and eventual adenocarcinomas in the lower gastrointestinal tract and less frequently, the upper gastrointestinal tract. Chemopreventive strategies have been studied in FAP patients to delay the development of adenomas in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, as well as to prevent recurrence of adenomas in the retained rectum of patients after prophylactic surgery with colectomy and ileorectal anastamosis (IRA). The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) sulindac and selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor celecoxib reduce polyposis of the retained rectum after colectomy with IRA. Reports of cardiovascular risks of some NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors have led to promising studies of lower doses in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid, statin, and difluoromethylornithine. Curcumin and eicosapentaenoic acid show efficacy in small clinical trials of FAP chemoprevention. This article will review the concept of chemoprevention and the current clinical literature in FAP chemoprevention.

Molecular alterations associated with sulindac-resistant colon tumors in ApcMin/+ mice

Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), including sulindac, have been used extensively as chemopreventive agents for colorectal cancer, results are not consistent. NSAIDs, most reportedly sulindac, often do not cause a complete regression of adenomas and some patients develop resistance to NSAID treatment. In this study, we evaluated the effect of sulindac on colon tumorigenesis in the Apc(Min/+) mouse model. Sulindac (180 ppm) given in drinking water for 9 weeks to Apc(Min/+) mice significantly reduced the size of colon tumors, but actually caused an increase in colon tumor multiplicity relative to untreated controls (average of 5.5 versus 1.6 tumors per mouse, respectively; P < 0.0001). This indicated that the drug could inhibit colon tumor progression but not initiation. As expected, in the small intestine, sulindac significantly reduced tumor size and multiplicity relative to untreated controls (average of 2.3 versus 42.0 tumors per mouse, respectively; P < 0.0001). Generation of a panel of prostanoids was comparably suppressed in the small intestine and colon by sulindac treatment. Sulindac is also known to exert its growth inhibitory effects through regulation of many noncyclooxygenase targets, including p21, beta-catenin, E-cadherin, mitochondrial apoptotic proteins, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. We found that sulindac treatment protected against E-cadherin loss in colon tumors, with associated inhibition of nuclear beta-catenin accumulation. Importantly, p21(WAF1/cip1) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma expression were absent in colon tumors from sulindac-treated mice, suggesting that loss of these proteins is necessary for drug resistance. Together, these observations may be translatable to designing novel clinical therapies using combinations of agents that target multiple molecular pathways to overcome sulindac resistance.

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression in photon-radiated and non-radiated uveal melanomas

PURPOSE

To determine and compare cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in photon-radiated and non-radiated malignant uveal melanomas and to analyse the correlation between COX-2 expression and prognosis.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining for COX-2 was performed on 21 uveal melanomas that were endoresected after prior stereotactic radiotherapy with photons and on 22 tumours that were treated by endoresection without prior radiotherapy. COX-2 staining was further analysed in respect to cell type, maximal prominence, time interval between radiotherapy and surgery, apoptotic index (AI), proliferative index (PI) and the development of metastatic disease.

RESULTS

There was no difference in COX-2 expression between radiated and non-radiated melanomas (P>0.15). COX-2 staining correlated with neither the tumour prominence (P>0.40) nor the AI or the PI (both P>0.35). Tumours with high COX-2 expression were significantly more likely to develop metastasis (P=0.022).

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy with photons does not induce COX-2 expression in malignant melanomas of the uvea. But high COX-2 expression may be a marker for poor prognosis.

Primary prevention of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer has been strongly associated with a Western lifestyle. In the past several decades, much has been learned about the dietary, lifestyle, and medication risk factors for this malignancy. Although there is controversy about the role of specific nutritional factors, consideration of dietary pattern as a whole appears useful for formulating recommendations. For example, several studies have shown that high intake of red and processed meats, highly refined grains and starches, and sugars is related to increased risk of colorectal cancer. Replacing these factors with poultry, fish, and plant sources as the primary source of protein; unsaturated fats as the primary source of fat; and unrefined grains, legumes and fruits as the primary source of carbohydrates is likely to lower risk of colorectal cancer. Although a role for supplements, including vitamin D, folate, and vitamin B6, remains uncertain, calcium supplementation is likely to be at least modestly beneficial. With respect to lifestyle, compelling evidence indicates that avoidance of smoking and heavy alcohol use, prevention of weight gain, and maintenance of a reasonable level of physical activity are associated with markedly lower risks of colorectal cancer. Medications such as aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and postmenopausal hormones for women are associated with substantial reductions in colorectal cancer risk, though their utility is affected by associated risks. Taken together, modifications in diet and lifestyle should substantially reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and could complement screening in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.

The safety and efficacy of celecoxib in children with familial adenomatous polyposis

OBJECTIVES

Celecoxib is approved as an adjunctive chemopreventive agent in adults with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Its safety and efficacy for colorectal polyps in children is unknown. We evaluated the short-term (3 months) safety and preliminary efficacy of celecoxib in children with FAP.

METHODS

This was a phase I, dose-escalation trial, with three successive cohorts of six children. Children of ages 10-14 years with APC gene mutations and/or adenomas with a family history of FAP were studied at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and the Cleveland Clinic. Colonoscopy was performed at baseline and month 3. Random assignment was in a 2:1 generic:placebo ratio, escalating from cohort 1 (4 mg/kg/day) to cohort 2 (8 mg/kg/day) to cohort 3 (16 mg/kg/day). Adherence and adverse event (AE) monitoring was conducted at 2-week intervals during drug administration. Safety profile, difference in number, and percent change in colorectal polyps were compared among the four treatments (placebo and the three dose-escalation groups).

RESULTS

Eighteen subjects completed drug dosing and both colonoscopies. Median age was 12.3 years (56% female). No clinically meaningful differences in AEs were seen between placebo subjects and subjects at any of the three celecoxib doses. Median polyp count at baseline was 31. There was a 39.1% increase in the number of polyps in placebo subjects at month 3, whereas in the highest dose celecoxib group, 16 mg/kg/day, a 44.2% reduction was seen (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Celecoxib at a dose of 16 mg/kg/day, corresponding to the adult dose of 400 mg BID, is safe, well tolerated, and significantly reduced the number of colorectal polyps in children with FAP.

NSAIDs: Old Drugs Reveal New Anticancer Targets

There is compelling evidence that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors have antineoplastic activity, but toxicity from cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition and the suppression of physiologically important prostaglandins limits their use for cancer chemoprevention. Previous studies as reviewed here suggest that the mechanism for their anticancer properties does not require COX inhibition, but instead involves an off-target effect. In support of this possibility, recent molecular modeling studies have shown that the NSAID sulindac can be chemically modified to selectively design out its COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitory activity. Unexpectedly, certain derivatives that were synthesized based on in silico modeling displayed increased potency to inhibit tumor cell growth. Other experiments have shown that sulindac can inhibit phosphodiesterase to increase intracellular cyclic GMP levels and that this activity is closely associated with its ability to selectively induce apoptosis of tumor cells. Together, these studies suggest that COX-independent mechanisms can be targeted to develop safer and more efficacious drugs for cancer chemoprevention.

Gastroduodenal involvement in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Prospective study of the nature and evolution of polyps: evaluation of the treatment and surveillance methods applied

OBJECTIVES

Analysis of the incidence rate and the evolution of duodenal and stomach polyps in our familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients, the suitability of the surveillance method and the cancer-preventing treatment applied and the analysis of the complications arising from each procedure employed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients diagnosed with FAP underwent study and endoscopic surveillance of the upper digestive tract. Front-view and side-view endoscopies were used. Papillary biopsies were performed even when the papilla were macroscopically normal. The Spigelman classification was used to determine the seriousness of the condition and to establish the surveillance and treatment intervals.

RESULTS

Duodenal and/or papillary polyps were presented by 79.3% of the patients. Endoscopic polypectomy was performed in 13 patients with duodenal polyps. Endoscopic polypectomies for the papilla were performed in all patients. One patient required a cephalic duodenopancreatectomy and another endoscopic ampullectomy. The condition did not become cancerous in any of the patients who underwent surveillance. We report two complications arising from treatment: one postpolypectomy haemorrhage and one stenosis of the biliary-enteric anastomosis after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows a high incidence rate of duodenal polyps in FAP patients. A minute examination of the duodenum and papilla is necessary, using side-view endoscopes and duodenal papilla biopsies even when papilla appears to be normal. None of the patients having completed the surveillance and the prescribed treatment developed cancer and all have a low Spigelman score. This method, therefore, seems to be adequate for the treatment and surveillance of duodenal polyps.

Aspirin for the chemoprevention of colorectal adenomas: meta-analysis of the randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Multiple lines of evidence indicate that aspirin has an antineoplastic effect in the large bowel. Randomized clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of aspirin for reducing the risk of colorectal adenomas. A meta-analysis of these trials will provide more precise estimates of the aspirin effect, both overall and in subgroups.

METHODS

We combined data from all randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials that evaluated aspirin for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. We used random-effects meta-analysis to estimate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect of aspirin on the occurrence of adenomas and of advanced lesions (ie, tubulovillous adenomas, villous adenomas, adenomas >or=1 cm in diameter, adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, or invasive cancer). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

We identified four clinical trials with 2967 randomly assigned participants. Each trial evaluated aspirin for the secondary prevention of colorectal adenomas. Doses of aspirin tested ranged from 81 to 325 mg/d. The average age of participants at baseline was 58 years, and 60% were male. Median follow-up was 33 months. A total of 2698 participants underwent colonoscopic follow-up and were included in the analysis of adenoma occurrence and advanced-lesion occurrence after randomization. Among these participants, adenomas were found in 424 (37%) of the 1156 participants allocated to placebo and in 507 (33%) of the 1542 participants allocated to any dose of aspirin. Advanced lesions were found in 12% of participants in the placebo group and in 9% of participants allocated to any dose of aspirin. The pooled risk ratio of any adenoma for any dose of aspirin vs placebo was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.96). This corresponded to an absolute risk reduction of 6.7% (95% CI = 3.2% to 10.2%). For any advanced lesion, the pooled risk ratio was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.57 to 0.90). We found no statistically significant effect modification for any of the baseline factors studied.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin is effective for the prevention of colorectal adenomas in individuals with a history of these lesions.

[Cyclooxygenase 2 and colorectal cancer: therapeutic implications]

There is epidemiological evidence that suggests an inverse association between the consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) and the risk of developing certain neoplasms. This association led to the identification of the therapeutic target of these drugs, cyclooxygenase type 2 (COX-2). Later studies have demonstrated that COX-2 is over-expressed in many malignant and pre-malignant lesions of different origins, among which are included colorectal neoplasms. This factor explains the beneficial effect observed with the use of classic NSAIDs and more recently, with selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs), in the treatment and/or prevention of several neoplasms.

Cyclooxygenase 2 expression in colorectal cancer with DNA mismatch repair deficiency

BACKGROUND

Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) overexpression is a frequent but not universal event in colorectal cancer. It has been suggested that COX-2 protein expression is reduced in colorectal cancer with a defective mismatch repair (MMR) system, a phenomenon commonly associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) but also present in up to 15% of sporadic tumors.

AIM

To assess COX-2 expression in a large series of fully characterized colorectal cancer patients with respect to the MMR system and to dissect the mechanisms responsible for altered COX-2 expression in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MMR-deficient colorectal cancer were identified in a nationwide, prospective, multicenter study (EPICOLON project). Control MMR-proficient colorectal cancer patients were randomly selected. COX-2 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Personal and familial characteristics, as well as MSH2/MLH1 expression and germ line mutations, were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-three patients, 46 with MMR deficiency and 107 with MMR proficiency, were included in the analysis. Overall, tumor COX-2 overexpression was observed in 107 patients (70%). COX-2 overexpression was observed in 85 patients (79%) with a MMR-proficient system, but only in 22 patients (48%) with a MMR-deficient colorectal cancer (P < 0.001). The lack of COX-2 overexpression was independently associated with a MMR-deficient system (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-8.51; P = 0.001) and a poor degree of differentiation (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.30-11.31; P = 0.015). In the subset of patients with a MMR-deficient colorectal cancer, lack of COX-2 overexpression correlated with a poor degree of differentiation, no fulfillment of Amsterdam II criteria, absence of MSH2/MLH1 germ line mutations, presence of tumor MSH2 expression, and lack of tumor MLH1 expression. CpG island promoter hypermethylation of COX2 was observed in 6 of 18 (33%) tumors lacking COX-2 expression in comparison with 2 of 28 (7%) tumors expressing this protein (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Up to half of MMR-deficient colorectal cancer do not show COX-2 overexpression, a fact observed almost exclusively in patients with sporadic forms. COX2 hypermethylation seems to be responsible for gene silencing in one third of them. These results suggest the potential utility of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in HNPCC chemoprevention and may explain the lack of response of this approach in some sporadic tumors.

Celecoxib induces anoikis in human colon carcinoma cells associated with the deregulation of focal adhesions and nuclear translocation of p130Cas

Celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, is effective as chemopreventive against colon cancer and it is the only nonsteoroidal antiinflammatory drug approved by the FDA for adjuvant therapy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. It is also being evaluated, within Phase II and III clinical trials, in combination with standard chemotherapy to treat sporadic colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, its antitumor mechanism of action is still not fully understood. In this study, we have evaluated the in vitro growth inhibitory effect of celecoxib in colon carcinoma cells and analyzed its mechanism of action. We report that the deregulation of the focal adhesion assembly protein Crk-associated substrate 130 kDa (p130Cas) by celecoxib plays a relevant role in the cytotoxic effect of this drug. Thus, celecoxib induces the proteolysis of p130Cas and the nuclear translocation of the 31 kDa generated fragment leading to apoptosis. Furthermore, overexpression of wild-type p130Cas reverts, in part, the growth inhibitory effect of celecoxib. In contrast, FAK and AKT do not appear to be involved in this activity. Our data suggest, for the first time, that the antitumor mechanism of action of celecoxib includes the induction of anoikis, an effect that is not related to COX-2 inhibition. Besides providing new insights into the antitumor effect of celecoxib, this novel mechanism of action holds potential relevance in drug development. Indeed, our results open the possibility to develop new celecoxib derivatives that induce anoikis without COX-2 inhibition so as to avoid the cardiovascular toxicity recently described for the COX-2 inhibitors.

Effect of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac on colorectal adenomas of uncolectomized familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to elucidate the effect of sulindac on uncolectomized familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

METHODS

Seven FAP patients (SU group) without proctocolectomy were given sulindac 300 mg/day orally for 12 months. Six FAP patients without sulindac (non-SU group) served as controls. Colorectal lesions were assessed by protrusion index (no. radiolucent areas/cm(2); PI) under barium enema examination and non-polypoid lesion were assessed under chromoscopy prior to and at the end of the observation period. In the SU group, germline adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutation was determined by protein truncation test.

RESULTS

In the SU group, PI decreased significantly in the distal colon (from 3.0 +/- 1.1 to 1.1 +/- 0.8/cm(2), P < 0.02) and in the proximal colon (from 3.4 +/- 2.4 to 0.9 +/- 1.3/cm(2), P < 0.02). The PI in the non-SU group slightly but significantly increased in the distal colon (from 1.0 +/- 0.8 to 1.2 +/- 0.9/cm(2); P < 0.05) and it remained unchanged in the proximal colon (from 0.6 +/- 0.3 to 0.7 +/- 0.3/cm(2); P > 0.05). Chromoscopy at the end of observation identified non-polypoid lesions in five patients in the SU group, whereas such lesions were not found in the non-SU group (71% vs 0%, P = 0.016). Decrease in PI was not different among distal APC mutation (exons 1-9), proximal APC mutation (exons 10-15) and negative mutation.

CONCLUSION

Sulindac reduces colorectal adenomas of protruding type in uncolectomized FAP. The effect of sulindac may be unrelated to genotype of FAP.

COX-2: a molecular target for colorectal cancer prevention

Cyclooxygenase (COX), a key enzyme in the prostanoid biosynthetic pathway, has received considerable attention due to its role in human cancers. Observational and randomized controlled studies in many different population cohorts and settings have demonstrated protective effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; the inhibitors of COX activity) for colorectal cancers (CRCs). COX-2, the inducible isoform of cyclooxygenase, is overexpressed in early and advanced CRC tissues, which portends a poor prognosis. Experimental studies have thus identified important mechanisms and pathways by which COX-2 plays an important role in carcinogenesis. Selective COX-2 inhibitors have been approved for use as adjunctive therapy for patients with familial polyposis. The role of COX-2 inhibitors is currently being evaluated for use in wider populations.

Cell Proliferation and Apoptotic Indices Predict Adenoma Regression in a Placebo-Controlled Trial of Celecoxib in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patients

Background: Celecoxib was shown to regress colorectal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients relative to placebo. To address the mechanism of polyp regression, we determined whether celecoxib can modulate cell proliferation, apoptosis, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in colorectal epithelia from FAP trial participants and whether such alterations correlate with observed reductions in polyp number. Materials and Methods: Colorectal mucosal biopsies were obtained at baseline and on last day of celecoxib (100 or 400 mg twice daily) or placebo administration (6 months). Residual paraffin-embedded adenomas and normal mucosa from the same patients (n = 17) or normal tissue alone (n = 15) were analyzed. Immunoperoxidase staining for Ki-67 was performed and apoptotic cells were identified by their morphology. Ki-67 and apoptotic labeling indices and their ratios were calculated in superficials (s) and nonsuperficial (ns) regions of adenomas and normal mucosa, and baseline to 6-month differences were calculated. PGE2 levels were analyzed by mass spectroscopy (normal, n = 64; adenoma, n = 56). Biomarkers were analyzed by treatment arm and correlated with previously determined mean percentage reductions in colorectal polyp number. Results: In adenomas, a reduction in the superficial proliferative activity i.e., Ki-67s labeling index, accompanied polyp regression (r = −0.76, P = 0.006). An increase in the apoptotic ratio [i.e., superficial apoptotic index (AIs)/nonsuperficial apoptotic index (AIns)] was found to correlate with reduced polyp counts in that higher apoptotic ratios correlated with better response to celecoxib (r = 0.71, P = 0.004). Furthermore, the AIs/Ki-67s ratio (r = 0.58, P = 0.026) accompanied polyp regression. In normal mucosa, a trend toward increased AIs (r = 0.33, P = 0.053) and polyp regression was found. PGE2 levels did not significantly correlate with polyp regression. Changes in biomarker levels (baseline to 6 months) were correlated in adenomas and normal mucosa (AIs, r = 0.29, P = 0.024; AIns, r = 0.34, P = 0.009; PGE2, r = 0.50, P = 0.059) within individual patients. Conclusion: Suppression of cell proliferation and an increased apoptotic ratio, as well as the ratio of apoptosis to cell proliferation, accompany polyp regression in a chemoprevention trial in FAP patients. These findings suggest potential mechanisms for the efficacy of celecoxib and warrant further study of these biomarkers as intermediate endpoints in FAP patients.

Cyclooxygenase-2 and 5-lipoxygenase converging functions on cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis: implications for cancer therapy

Cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LO) metabolic pathways are emerging as key regulators of cell proliferation and neo-angiogenesis. COX and LO inhibitors are being investigated as potential anticancer drugs and results from clinical trials seem to be encouraging. In this article we will review evidence of COX-2 and 5-LO involvement in cancer pathobiology, propose a model of integrated control of cell proliferation by these enzymes, and discuss the pharmacologic implications of this model.

The cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors rofecoxib and celecoxib prevent colorectal neoplasia occurrence and recurrence

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death. Most colorectal cancers are believed to develop from colorectal adenomas. We examined the effect of the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors rofecoxib and celecoxib, nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, and acetaminophen on colorectal neoplasia (colorectal cancer, colorectal adenoma, or both).

METHODS

This was a nested case-control study, which used data from a government insurance database on patients 65 years and older who underwent a diagnostic test or procedure for colorectal neoplasia between January and June 2001. Logistic regression models were used to determine the effect of exposure to the drugs of interest for at least 3 months on the occurrence or recurrence of colorectal neoplasia.

RESULTS

The control group included 2568 patients found to be free of colorectal neoplasia; 730 patients were diagnosed with colorectal adenoma, and 179 were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Patients more likely to have colorectal adenoma (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) were those diagnosed with colorectal adenoma (4.12, 3.27-5.18) or colorectal cancer (3.74, 2.32-6.03) in the previous 1-3 years and those with hemorrhage of the rectum or unspecified anemia in the prior month (3.19, 2.46-4.12). Exposures to rofecoxib (0.67, 0.46-0.98) and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (0.41, 0.21-0.83) reduced the risk of colorectal adenoma. Rofecoxib, celecoxib, and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were all protective against both neoplasias (0.64, 0.45-0.91; 0.73, 0.54-0.99; and 0.47, 0.26-0.86, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Rofecoxib, celecoxib, and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs seem to protect against the development of colorectal neoplasia.

Modifiable risk factors for colon cancer

Although many mechanisms remain unclear, a large body of evidence indicates that several dietary and lifestyle factors are likely to have a major influence on the risk of colon cancer. Physical inactivity, excess body weight, and a central deposition of adiposity are consistent risk factors. Overconsumption of energy is likely to be one of the major contributors to the high rates of colon cancer in Western countries. Beyond their influence on energy balance, the independent role of specific macronutrients remain controversial. Red meat, processed meats, and perhaps refined carbohydrates contribute to risk. Recent evidence indicate that chronic hyperinsulinemia may increase risk of colon cancer. As insulin resistance and subsequent hyperinsulinemia is induced by excess energy intake and some aspects of the Western diet (e.g., saturated fats and refined carbohydrates), insulin may be a focus of factors influencing colon cancer risk. Recent evidence also points to a role of IGF-1, but our understanding of modifiable factors that influence levels of these is poor at present. Of note is that hyperinsulinemia increases free IGF-1 exposure [25]. High alcohol consumption, probably in combination with a diet low in some micronutrients such as folate and methionine, and smoking early in life are likely to increase risk of colon cancer. Recent epidemiologic studies have tended not to support a strong influence of fiber; instead, some micronutrients or phytochemicals in fiber-rich foods may be important. Folate is one such nutrient that has received attention lately and is being studied in randomized intervention trials. Agents with chemopreventive properties, such as aspirin and postmenopausal estrogens, have potential adverse effects so a careful consideration of the risk-benefit ratio is required before general recommendations can be made. Other NSAIDs with a potential for reduced toxicity, such as celecoxib, are currently being evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. The overwhelming evidence indicates that primary prevention of colon cancer is feasible. At least 70% of colon cancers may be preventable by moderate changes in diet and lifestyle [197]. Secondary prevention, through screening by sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, is also critically important to prevent mortality from colon cancer; however, many of the diet and lifestyle risk factors for colon cancers are the same for cardiovascular disease and for some other cancers, so focusing on the modifiable risk factors for colon cancer is likely to have many additional benefits beyond this cancer.

Reducing the risk of colorectal cancer by intervening in the process of carcinogenesis: a status report

Risk factors for colorectal cancer have been identified, and significant advances have been made in understanding the process of colorectal carcinogenesis. The transition from normal colonic mucosa to adenomatous polyp to adenocarcinoma is a gradual process involving genetic and epigenetic instability that can take decades, offering numerous opportunities for early detection (e.g., colonoscopy screenings), lifestyle changes (e.g., reduced red meat intake, increased physical activity, and reduced alcohol/ tobacco exposure), and chemopreventive interventions. Aspirin and various other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may have chemopreventive benefits for colorectal cancer and other human epithelial carcinomas, butthe long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is associated with serious gastrointestinal side effects. Recently, overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 has been documented in colorectal tumors and numerous other pre-cancers and cancers. The development of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, such as celecoxib, provides an opportunity for preventive intervention in the carcinogenic process. Celecoxib has been approved for the management of familial adenomatous polyposis and is under investigation for the management of sporadic colorectal polyps and for its potential as a chemopreventive agent for other cancers.

Rationale and feasibility of chemoprovention of hepatocellular carcinoma by cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a growing health problem worldwide. The limited treatment and poor prognosis of this disease emphasizes the importance of developing effective prevention, including chemoprevention. Improvement in early diagnosis of HCC and regular screen of individuals with increased risk for HCC provide the possibility of effective chemoprevention for HCC in the future. Hepatocarcinogenesis is best described as a continuity of regeneration, proliferation, unregulated hyperplasia, dysplasia, and malignant transformation. Uncontrolled proliferation of hepatocytes clearly plays a key role in hepatocarcinogenesis. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) has been associated with tumorigenesis of colon cancer. Selective COX-2 inhibitors possess potent suppression on the growth of colon cancer. Overexpression of COX-2 has also recently been demonstrated in patients with HCC, especially in nontumorous tissue with cirrhosis and well-differentiated tumorous tissue. In vitro studies have revealed that both NS-398, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, and sulindac, an analog of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, effectively inhibit growth of human hepatoma cell lines, which is mediated by a decreased rate of cell proliferation. Although further in vivo studies are required in animal models to confirm these findings and define optimal doses for future clinical trials in human subjects, these findings provide a rationale for the use of COX-2 inhibitors as HCC chemoprevention.

Review article: COX-2, prostanoids and colon cancer

Epidemiological, experimental, and clinical studies have demonstrated that colon carcinogenesis may be prevented by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Although controversy remains, recent studies, including ours, have revealed that NSAIDs suppress colon carcinogenesis at the adenoma stage where cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), a major molecular target in this action, is mainly expressed in interstitial cells but not in tumour cells. Therefore, it is unlikely that NSAIDs prevent colon cancer formation through modulating the functions of tumour cells. A more possible assumption is that NSAIDs suppress colon carcinogenesis through the inhibition of prostaglandin formation. However, the mechanisms by which prostanoids promote colon carcinogenesis have not been elucidated to date. A prostanoids act through both membrane receptors and nuclear receptors such as peroxisome proliferator receptor (PPAR) gamma or delta, one focus in this area is to investigate their roles in colon carcinogenesis, including the induction of growth factors.

Screening for colon cancer and evaluation of chemoprevention with coxibs

Although colorectal cancer is one of the most preventable forms of visceral cancer, it remains the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Most colorectal cancers are believed to arise from adenomatous polyps, premalignant mucosal masses that account for up to two thirds of colorectal polyps. Early identification and removal of adenomas prevent the development of colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy has emerged as the dominant method for evaluating symptomatic patients with colorectal cancer and for surveillance of patients with previous colon polyps or cancer. In the United States, fecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy are the most commonly used screening methods in average-risk persons, although there is an emerging trend toward the use of colonoscopy. For both screening and surveillance, the type of screening test used and the intervals at which it is performed are based on risk stratification, which also serves as the basis for selecting potential candidates for chemoprevention. Because colonoscopy, like most screening procedures, has several disadvantages, including risk of perforation and bleeding and an inherent "miss rate," alternative methods of prevention are being explored. A variety of agents with potential chemopreventive benefits have been identified, including cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitors (coxibs) even though these agents have not been approved for this use in the United States. COX-2 is overexpressed in colonic adenomas and cancers, and its inhibition has been shown to produce regression of polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis. Nonselective COX inhibition with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been consistently associated with reductions in the risk of mortality and the incidence of colorectal adenomas and cancers in case-control studies. Thus, selective COX-2 inhibition is a potential method of risk reduction in high-risk screening and surveillance groups, and large-scale trials of coxibs for the prevention of recurrence of adenomas after polypectomy are currently underway.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, apoptosis, and colon-cancer chemoprevention

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can inhibit colorectal tumorigenesis and are among the few agents known to be chemopreventive. Epidemiological studies and experiments with animals have shown that NSAIDs have powerful anticolorectal cancer properties, but the mechanism of these effects remains unclear. NSAIDs can inhibit neoplastic growth by inducing apoptosis in cancer cells; the way they do this is currently an area of intense investigation. The most well-characterised pharmacological feature of NSAIDs is their inhibition of the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase (COX), which catalyses the synthesis of prostaglandins. Several studies have shown that COX inhibition prevents cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis. The chemopreventive effects of NSAIDs are thought to occur via this pathway. Other observations indicate that NSAIDs also promote apoptosis through mechanisms that are independent of COX inhibition. This idea is supported by the finding that compounds that are structurally similar to NSAIDs, but do not inhibit COX, also have chemopreventive and proapoptotic properties. COX-dependent and COX-independent mechanisms of apoptosis induction are not mutually exclusive, and it is likely that both have a role in the biological activity of NSAIDs. Knowledge of how NSAIDs prevent neoplastic growth will greatly aid the design of better chemopreventive drugs and novel treatments for colorectal cancer.

NSAID inhibition of GI cancer growth: clinical implications and molecular mechanisms of action

Epidemiological studies suggest that aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce the incidence of and mortality from colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancers. The precise mechanisms by which NSAIDs exert their chemopreventive effects are not fully explained, but likely involve inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase, the enzyme that converts arachidonic acid to prostaglandins. Two isoforms of this enzyme, cyclo-oxygenase 1 (COX-1) and COX-2, have been identified. COX-2 is absent in normal mucosa but is overexpressed in colonic, gastric, and esophageal cancers, as well as their precursor lesions. The inhibition of COX-2 through either pharmacological agents or gene deletion results in suppression of colonic polyp formation. NSAIDs reduce colonic, gastric, and esophageal cancer cell growth, in part, by inducing apoptosis. However, the antineoplastic effects of NSAIDs may be partly independent of their ability to inhibit COX-2. The mechanisms involved in the antineoplastic actions of NSAIDs include inhibition of angiogenesis (essential for delivery of oxygen and nutrients to a growing tumor), induction of apoptosis (which is usually reduced in cancer cells) by stimulation of proapoptotic genes, and direct inhibition of cancer cell growth by blocking signal transduction pathways responsible for cell proliferation.

Review article: the non-inherited gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes

The non-inherited gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes represent a group of rare disorders characterized by the presence of multiple, non-adenomatous polyps on the gastrointestinal mucosa occurring in unrelated patients. We present here a review of the clinical and histo- pathological aspects of the syndromes to include the Cronkhite-Canada syndrome, hyperplastic polyposis and lipomatous polyposis. While infrequently encountered, these diseases can have devastating clinical effects that may be aggravated by delays in diagnosis and treatment. Prompt accurate diagnosis and treatment of these uncommon disorders depend on a sound working knowledge of the distinct clinical and pathological features described herein.

Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer by aspirin: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aim of the study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of aspirin and colonoscopy in the prevention of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A Markov process is used to follow a hypothetical cohort of 100,000 subjects aged 50 years until death. Four strategies are compared: (1) no intervention, (2) colonoscopy once per 10 years and every 3 years in subjects with polyps, (3) chemoprevention with 325 mg of daily aspirin, and (4) combination of the second and third strategies. The various strategies are compared calculating incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

The expected number of colorectal cancers is 5904 per 100,000 subjects. Colonoscopy prevents 4428 colorectal cancers and saves 7951 life-years at an ICER of $10,983 per life-year saved compared with no intervention. Aspirin prevents 2952 colorectal cancers and saves 5301 life-years at an ICER of $47,249 per life-year saved compared with no intervention. The cost of aspirin therapy plus management of aspirin-related complications was reported to be $172 per year per patient. Varying the annual aspirin-related costs between $50 and $200 results in ICER changes between $4617 and $57,080, with the 2 strategies breaking even at $70. Applying aspirin chemoprevention plus colonoscopy screening concomitantly yields an ICER of $227,607 per life-year saved compared with screening colonoscopy alone.

CONCLUSION

As compared with colonoscopy once per 10 years, the use of aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer saves fewer lives at higher costs. The high complication cost and the lower efficacy of aspirin render screening colonoscopy a more cost-effective strategy to prevent colorectal cancer.

Celecoxib as adjunctive therapy for treatment of colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To describe the role of celecoxib as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an inherited autosomal dominant predisposition syndrome for colorectal cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was evaluated through MEDLINE search (1995-March 2000) and through secondary sources, using the search terms celecoxib, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, and familial adenomatous polyps.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Observational studies have found a decreased rate of colorectal cancer in people who regularly took aspirin or other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval in December 1999 for the NSAID celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, for adjunctive therapy in patients with FAP, based on a six-month, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin and other NSAIDs reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer in the general population. Limited clinical studies in patients with FAP using nonaspirin NSAIDs have shown a reduction in polyp burden. A current clinical trial using celecoxib has also shown a reduction in polyp burden in patients with FAP. The long-term clinical impact of using a selective COX-2 inhibitor is not known, since celecoxib has not been studied beyond six months in patients with FAP. By reducing the polyp burden in FAP patients, celecoxib may be useful as adjunctive chemotherapy, in addition to routine endoscopic surveillance and surgery.

Relationship between APC genotype, polyp distribution, and oral sulindac treatment in the colon and rectum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

PURPOSE

Familial adenomatous polyposis is an inherited colorectal cancer syndrome characterized by the presence of multiple adenomatous colorectal polyps. Molecular studies have revealed that germline mutations in the APC gene are the underlying cause of the disease. The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent sulindac has been shown to reduce the number of colorectal adenomas. Most sulindac trials in the large bowel have focused on the distal colon and relatively little is known about its effect on the proximal colon. Moreover, it is unknown whether the site of the APC mutation affects the efficacy of sulindac.

METHODS

This study investigated whether there were regional differences in the effect of sulindac on the colon and whether response to sulindac was dependent on the site of mutation in the APC gene. In an open prospective study 17 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis were treated with 300 mg oral sulindac daily for four months followed by a washout phase of six months. Ten of the patients had an intact colon and seven had rectal stumps only. The number, size, and the degree of dysplasia of the adenomas were evaluated by colonoscopy at entry, end of treatment and end of the study.

RESULTS

Overall, a statistically significant decrease in the number of adenomas was observed (120 +/- 112 to 28 +/- 64, P = 0.007). After cessation of sulindac treatment the number of adenomas increased to 48 +/- 44.5, but remained significantly lower than the values observed at baseline. In the ten patients with intact colons, adenomas decreased by sevenfold in the proximal colon (103 +/- 73 to 15.1 +/- 47.4, P = 0.011) and twofold in the distal colon (80 +/- 52 to 29.6 +/- 37.2, P = 0.005). The size of adenomas and the grade of dysplasia also decreased. No correlation could be seen between the APC mutation site and the response to treatment.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that sulindac reduces the number of adenomas in the entire colon and that the effect seems to be more pronounced in the proximal colon.

Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer

Goal

After completing this CE program, the participant will understand the basic concepts of chemoprevention and will be able to discuss the currently existing clinical data for the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer.

Objectives

At the completion of this program the participant will be able to: 1. Discuss the complicating factors in performing chemoprevention trials. 2. Describe the dietary modifications to prevent colorectal cancer. 3. Describe the proposed mechanisms of action of agents used in the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. 4. Discuss, and where appropriate recommend, appropriate agents for use in the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. 5. Describe the differences between familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), and spontaneous adenoma formation.

Primary cancer prevention trials

Great progress has been made in cancer chemoprevention during the past 2 decades. Nevertheless, the field could benefit from the experiences of investigators studying the prevention of cardiovascular disease. During the past 50 years, prevention of cardiovascular disease has gone from a dream to a reality, with major clinical impact. The trend during the last 30 years has been impressive and sustained. From 1987 to 1994, there was a sustained major decrease in age-adjusted mortality from coronary heart disease in both men (from 3.1 to 2.2 per thousand persons) and women (from 1.1 to 0.9 per thousand persons). This trend is believed to have resulted from improvements in the treatment of myocardial infarction and, more substantively, from improvements in secondary prevention. This explanation is consistent with earlier computer simulations of trends in cardiovascular mortality during the 1980s, which estimated that 25% of the declines were attributable to primary prevention and 70% were caused by reductions in risk factors or treatment. The greatest effect of primary prevention had previously been noted in the late 1960s and 1970s. Most of these important findings occurred before cholesterol-lowering drugs became widely available, so further improvements are expected. Researchers in cancer prevention should follow in the footsteps of their cardiovascular colleagues. The tools are now available to make prevention of cancer a clinical reality. As the science of prevention improves, it must be remembered that effective and efficient preventive services do not help if they are not used. It is difficult to motivate practitioners and patients to implement preventive services. Also, preventive services are often considered a luxury. Persons without health insurance and those covered by Medicaid are much more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage cancer; therefore, they are key cohorts to target for effective preventive approaches. Finally, the most effective cancer prevention program will probably use both rational drug therapy targeting specific risk factors and public health efforts to promote healthy lifestyle choices in the population at large.

The effect of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis have a nearly 100 percent risk of colorectal cancer. In this disease, the chemopreventive effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may be related to their inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2.

METHODS

We studied the effect of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, on colorectal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomly assigned 77 patients to treatment with celecoxib (100 or 400 mg twice daily) or placebo for six months. Patients underwent endoscopy at the beginning and end of the study. We determined the number and size of polyps from photographs and videotapes; the response to treatment was expressed as the mean percent change from base line.

RESULTS

At base line, the mean (+/-SD) number of polyps in focal areas where polyps were counted was 15.5+/-13.4 in the 15 patients assigned to placebo, 11.5+/-8.5 in the 32 patients assigned to 100 mg of celecoxib twice a day, and 12.3+/-8.2 in the 30 patients assigned to 400 mg of celecoxib twice a day (P=0.66 for the comparison among groups). After six months, the patients receiving 400 mg of celecoxib twice a day had a 28.0 percent reduction in the mean number of colorectal polyps (P=0.003 for the comparison with placebo) and a 30.7 percent reduction in the polyp burden (the sum of polyp diameters) (P=0.001), as compared with reductions of 4.5 and 4.9 percent, respectively, in the placebo group. The improvement in the extent of colorectal polyposis in the group receiving 400 mg twice a day was confirmed by a panel of endoscopists who reviewed the videotapes. The reductions in the group receiving 100 mg of celecoxib twice a day were 11.9 percent (P=0.33 for the comparison with placebo) and 14.6 percent (P=0.09), respectively. The incidence of adverse events was similar among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, six months of twice-daily treatment with 400 mg of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, leads to a significant reduction in the number of colorectal polyps.