Leaving negative ancestors behind

The complete catalog of antimicrobial resistance secondary active transporters in Clostridioides difficile: evolution and drug resistance perspective

Secondary active transporters shuttle substrates across eukaryotic and prokaryotic membranes, utilizing different electrochemical gradients. They are recognized as one of the antimicrobial efflux pumps among pathogens. While primary active transporters within the genome of C. difficile 630 have been completely cataloged, the systematical study of secondary active transporters remains incomplete. Here, we not only identify secondary active transporters but also disclose their evolution and role in drug resistance in C. difficile 630. Our analysis reveals that C. difficile 630 carries 147 secondary active transporters belonging to 27 (super)families. Notably, 50 (34%) of them potentially contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). AMR-secondary active transporters are structurally classified into five (super)families: the p-aminobenzoyl-glutamate transporter (AbgT), drug/metabolite transporter (DMT) superfamily, major facilitator (MFS) superfamily, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family, and resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family. Surprisingly, complete RND genes found in C. difficile 630 are likely an evolutionary leftover from the common ancestor with the diderm. Through protein structure comparisons, we have potentially identified six novel AMR-secondary active transporters from DMT, MATE, and MFS (super)families. Pangenome analysis revealed that half of the AMR-secondary transporters are accessory genes, which indicates an important role in adaptive AMR function rather than innate physiological homeostasis. Gene expression profile firmly supports their ability to respond to a wide spectrum of antibiotics. Our findings highlight the evolution of AMR-secondary active transporters and their integral role in antibiotic responses. This marks AMR-secondary active transporters as interesting therapeutic targets to synergize with other antibiotic activity.

Deeply branching Bacillota species exhibit atypical Gram-negative staining

The Gram staining method differentiates bacteria based on their cell envelope structure, with the monoderm and diderm cell envelope types traditionally being synonymous with Gram-positive and Gram-negative stain results, respectively. Monoderms have a single phospholipid membrane surrounded by a thick layer of peptidoglycan, while diderms have a lipopolysaccharide outer membrane exterior to a thin peptidoglycan layer. The Bacillota (formerly Firmicutes) phylum has members with both cell wall types, and recent phylogenetic analyses have shown that monoderm Bacillota evolved from diderm ancestors on multiple occasions. Here, we compiled Gram staining and ultrastructural data for Bacillota species with complete genomes to further investigate the evolution of Gram-positive and Gram-negative cell wall types. The results indicate that many deeply branching lineages at the root of Bacillota phylum stain Gram-negative but do not harbor genes for outer membrane protein or lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. Phylogenetic reconstructions suggest that several deeply branching Bacillota species have retained a thin peptidoglycan layer in their cell walls, which was inherited from a diderm ancestor. Taxa with this atypical Gram-negative-staining cell wall structure include the thermophilic anaerobe Symbiobacterium thermophilum and members of the Desulfotomaculia, Syntrophamonadia, Desulfitobacteriia, Thermosediminibacteria, and Thermoanaerobacteria. Using Gram-staining results as a proxy for cell wall thickness, our analysis indicates that several independent peptidoglycan thickening events may have occurred in the evolution of the Gram-positive cell envelope.

IMPORTANCE

In this study, we examined the evolution of bacterial cell envelopes, specifically focusing on Gram-positive and Gram-negative cell wall types in the Bacillota phylum. Our results indicate that certain bacteria can stain Gram-negative despite having a monoderm cell wall structure, thus challenging the conventional interpretation of Gram-staining results. Our observations also question the assumption that Gram-negative staining is always indicative of a diderm structure. These findings have broader implications for understanding how and when cell walls thicken during the evolution of bacterial cell envelopes.

Comparative genomics and phylogenomic analyses of lysine riboswitch distributions in bacteria

Riboswitches are cis-regulatory elements that regulate the expression of genes involved in biosynthesis or transport of a ligand that binds to them. Among the nearly 40 classes of riboswitches discovered so far, three are known to regulate the concentration of biologically encoded amino acids glycine, lysine, and glutamine. While some comparative genomics studies of riboswitches focusing on their gross distribution across different bacterial taxa have been carried out recently, systematic functional annotation and analysis of lysine riboswitches and the genes they regulate are still lacking. We analyzed 2785 complete bacterial genome sequences to systematically identify 468 lysine riboswitches (not counting hits from multiple strains of the same species) and obtain a detailed phylogenomic map of gene-specific lysine riboswitch distribution across diverse prokaryotic phyla. We find that lysine riboswitches are most abundant in Firmicutes and Gammaproteobacteria where they are found upstream to both biosynthesis and/or transporter genes. They are relatively rare in all other prokaryotic phyla where if present they are primarily found upstream to operons containing many lysine biosynthesis genes. The genome-wide study of the genetic organisation of the lysine riboswitches show considerable variation both within and across different Firmicute orders. Correlating the location of a riboswitch with its genomic context and its phylogenetic relationship with other evolutionarily related riboswitch carrying species, enables identification and annotation of many lysine biosynthesis, transporter and catabolic genes. It also reveals previously unknown patterns of lysine riboswitch distribution and gene/operon regulation and allows us to draw inferences about the possible point of origin of lysine riboswitches. Additionally, evidence of horizontal transfer of riboswitches was found between Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. Our analysis provides a useful resource that will lead to a better understanding of the evolution of these regulatory elements and prove to be beneficial for exploiting riboswitches for developing targeted therapies.