1
|
Ussher M, Fleming J, Brose L. Vaping during pregnancy: a systematic review of health outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:435. [PMID: 38902658 PMCID: PMC11191278 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06633-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Smoking during pregnancy is harmful to maternal and child health. Vaping is used for smoking cessation but evidence on health effects during pregnancy is scarce. We conducted a systematic review of health outcomes of vaping during pregnancy. METHODS We searched six databases for maternal/fetal/infant outcomes and vaping, including quantitative, English language, human studies of vaping during pregnancy, to November 10th, 2023. We assessed study quality with the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. We focused on comparisons of exclusive-vaping with non-use of nicotine and tobacco products and with smoking. Presentation is narrative as the studies were of insufficient quality to conduct meta-analysis. RESULTS We included 26 studies, with 765,527 women, with one randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing vaping and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation, 23 cohort studies and two case-control studies. While the RCT met 4/5 quality criteria, the quality of the cohort studies and case-control studies was poor; none adequately assessed exposure to smoking and vaping. For studies comparing exclusive-vaping with 'non-use', more reported no increased risk for vaping (three studies) than reported increased risk for maternal pregnancy/postpartum outcomes (one study) and for fetal and infant outcomes (20 studies no increased risk, four increased risk), except for birth-weight and neurological outcomes where two studies each observed increased and no increased risk. When the RCT compared non-users with those not smoking but vaping or using NRT, irrespective of randomisation, they reported no evidence of risk for vaping/NRT. For studies comparing exclusive-vaping and exclusive-smoking, most studies provided evidence for a comparable risk for different outcomes. One maternal biomarker study revealed a lower risk for vaping. For small-for-gestational-age/mean-birth-centile equal numbers of studies found lower risk for vaping than for smoking as found similar risk for the two groups (two each). CONCLUSIONS While more studies found no evidence of increased risk of exclusive-vaping compared with non-use and evidence of comparable risk for exclusive-vaping and exclusive-smoking, the quality of the evidence limits conclusions. Without adequate assessment of exposure to vaping and smoking, findings cannot be attributed to behaviour as many who vape will have smoked and many who vape may do so at low levels. STUDY REGISTRATION https://osf.io/rfx4q/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ussher
- Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
| | - Joy Fleming
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Leonie Brose
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, SE5 8BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pease M, Mittal A, Merkaj S, Okonkwo DO, Gonzalez-Martinez JA, Elmer J, Liou WS, Pingue V, Hammond FM, Abramovici S, Castellano J, Barot N. Early Seizure Prophylaxis in Mild and Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Neurol 2024; 81:507-514. [PMID: 38587858 PMCID: PMC11002778 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Importance Guidelines recommend seizure prophylaxis for early posttraumatic seizures (PTS) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Use of antiseizure medications for early seizure prophylaxis after mild or moderate TBI remains controversial. Objective To determine the association between seizure prophylaxis and risk reduction for early PTS in mild and moderate TBI. Data Sources PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (January 1, 1991, to April 18, 2023) were systematically searched. Study Selection Observational studies of adult patients presenting to trauma centers in high-income countries with mild (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS], 13-15) and moderate (GCS, 9-12) TBI comparing rates of early PTS among patients with seizure prophylaxis with those without seizure prophylaxis. Data Extraction and Synthesis The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were used. Two authors independently reviewed all titles and abstracts, and 3 authors reviewed final studies for inclusion. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with absolute risk reduction. Main Outcome Measures The main outcome was absolute risk reduction of early PTS, defined as seizures within 7 days of initial injury, in patients with mild or moderate TBI receiving seizure prophylaxis in the first week after injury. A secondary analysis was performed in patients with only mild TBI. Results A total of 64 full articles were reviewed after screening; 8 studies (including 5637 patients) were included for the mild and moderate TBI analysis, and 5 studies (including 3803 patients) were included for the mild TBI analysis. The absolute risk reduction of seizure prophylaxis for early PTS in mild to moderate TBI (GCS, 9-15) was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.2%; P = .02). The absolute risk reduction for mild TBI alone was similar 0.6% (95% CI, 0.01%-1.2%; P = .04). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 seizure was 167 patients. Conclusion and Relevance Seizure prophylaxis after mild and moderate TBI was associated with a small but statistically significant reduced risk of early posttraumatic seizures after mild and moderate TBI. The small absolute risk reduction and low prevalence of early seizures should be weighed against potential acute risks of antiseizure medications as well as the risk of inappropriate continuation beyond 7 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Pease
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Adi Mittal
- University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sara Merkaj
- Yale University Medical School, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - David O. Okonkwo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UPMC Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jonathan Elmer
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Critical Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Wen-Shyong Liou
- Department of Pharmacy, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Valeria Pingue
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Neurorehabiltation and Spinal Unit of the Institute of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Flora M. Hammond
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Sergiu Abramovici
- Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - James Castellano
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Niravkumar Barot
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pease M, Gupta K, Moshé SL, Correa DJ, Galanopoulou AS, Okonkwo DO, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Shutter L, Diaz-Arrastia R, Castellano JF. Insights into epileptogenesis from post-traumatic epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurol 2024; 20:298-312. [PMID: 38570704 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-024-00954-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) accounts for 5% of all epilepsies. The incidence of PTE after traumatic brain injury (TBI) depends on the severity of injury, approaching one in three in groups with the most severe injuries. The repeated seizures that characterize PTE impair neurological recovery and increase the risk of poor outcomes after TBI. Given this high risk of recurrent seizures and the relatively short latency period for their development after injury, PTE serves as a model disease to understand human epileptogenesis and trial novel anti-epileptogenic therapies. Epileptogenesis is the process whereby previously normal brain tissue becomes prone to recurrent abnormal electrical activity, ultimately resulting in seizures. In this Review, we describe the clinical course of PTE and highlight promising research into epileptogenesis and treatment using animal models of PTE. Clinical, imaging, EEG and fluid biomarkers are being developed to aid the identification of patients at high risk of PTE who might benefit from anti-epileptogenic therapies. Studies in preclinical models of PTE have identified tractable pathways and novel therapeutic strategies that can potentially prevent epilepsy, which remain to be validated in humans. In addition to improving outcomes after TBI, advances in PTE research are likely to provide therapeutic insights that are relevant to all epilepsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Pease
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| | - Kunal Gupta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Solomon L Moshé
- The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Paediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel J Correa
- The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aristea S Galanopoulou
- The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - David O Okonkwo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Lori Shutter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hedges A, Findlay MC, Davis GE, Wolfe BM, Hawryluk GWJ, Menacho ST, Ansari S. Levetiracetam dosing for seizure prophylaxis in neurocritical care patients. Brain Inj 2023; 37:1167-1172. [PMID: 36856437 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2023.2184495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Levetiracetam is used for seizure prophylaxis in patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or traumatic brain injury (TBI). We aim to characterize the optimal levetiracetam dosage for seizure prophylaxis. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included adult patients at an academic tertiary hospital presenting with SAH or TBI who received levetiracetam at a total daily dose (TDD) equivalent to or greater than 1000 mg. The primary outcome was combined seizure incidence, including clinical and subclinical seizures. RESULTS We identified 139 patients (49.6% male, mean age 53 years) for inclusion. For patients receiving a 1000-mg TDD, the administration was 500 mg twice daily. For patients receiving >1000-mg TDD, 77/78 patients received 1000 mg twice daily and one patient received 750 mg twice daily. Patients receiving 1000-mg TDD had a higher seizure incidence than those receiving >1000-mg TDD (p = 0.01), despite no difference in examined confounders, including history of alcoholism (p = 0.49), benzodiazepine use (p = 0.28), or propofol use (p = 0.17). No difference in adverse effects was observed (anemia, p = 0.44; leukopenia, p = 0.60; thrombocytopenia, p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS Patients may experience a reduced incidence of clinical and electroencephalographic seizures with levetiracetam dosing >1000-mg TDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Hedges
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Gary E Davis
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Brianne M Wolfe
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Sarah T Menacho
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Safdar Ansari
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huo X, Xu X, Li M, Xiao L, Wang Y, Li W, Wang C, Sun T. Effectiveness of antiseizure medications therapy in preventing seizures in brain injury patients: A network meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1001363. [PMID: 36188582 PMCID: PMC9521202 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1001363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the effectiveness of different anti-seizure medications in preventing early and late post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE). The efficacy, treatment-related side-effects, and mortality of the different treatments were compared using a ranking model to identify the optimal treatment. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases. All relevant published articles up to 10 March 2022 were evaluated. The quality of the extracted data was assessed using either the Cochrane risk of bias tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome measures were early or late post-traumatic seizures. The secondary outcome measures were mortality, treatment-related adverse effects, length of hospital stay, and length of stay within the intensive care unit (ICU). Results: A total of seven randomized controlled trials and 18 non-randomized controlled trials were included in this network meta-analysis. The trials included six interventions: Phenytoin (PHT)+phenobarbital (PB), levetiracetam (LEV), PHT, PHT-LEV, lacosamide (LCM), and valproate (VPA). All interventions except VPA significantly reduced the rate of early PTE in TBI patients compared with the placebo. Seven studies reported the impact of four treatments (PHT + PB, LEV, PHT, VPA) on late seizures and showed a significant reduction in the incidence of late seizures in patients with TBI compared with placebo. The impact of PHT, LEV, and VPA on mortality was reported in nine studies. PHT had no impact on mortality, but patients treated with both LEV and VPA had higher mortality than those treated with placebo. The treatment-related adverse effects of LEV, PHT, and LCM were reported in five studies. LEV and PHT had higher treatment-related adverse effects incidence than placebo, while LCM had no effect on treatment related-adverse effects. Conclusion: LEV and PHT prevented early and late PTE. PHT also reduced the mortality rate in patients with TBI. Both LEV and PHT had higher treatment-related adverse effects compared with placebo. However, LEV had a slightly lower incidence of treatment-related adverse effects when compared with PHT. Compared with PHT, LEV did not reduce the length of hospital stay but shortened the length of ICU stays. Therefore, based on the findings of this meta-analysis, we speculate that LEV is the best treatment option for TBI patients. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianhao Huo
- Neurosurgery Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Ningxia Key Laboratory of Cerebrocranial Disease, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Clinical Medical College, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Xingguo Xu
- Neurosurgery Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Mei Li
- Ningxia Key Laboratory of Cerebrocranial Disease, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Clinical Medical College, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Lifei Xiao
- Neurosurgery Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Ningxia Key Laboratory of Cerebrocranial Disease, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Clinical Medical College, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Yangyang Wang
- Ningxia Key Laboratory of Cerebrocranial Disease, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Clinical Medical College, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Neurosurgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China
| | - Wenchao Li
- Ningxia Key Laboratory of Cerebrocranial Disease, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Clinical Medical College, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Neurosurgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China
| | - Chaofan Wang
- Neurosurgery Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Ningxia Key Laboratory of Cerebrocranial Disease, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Clinical Medical College, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Neurosurgery Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- Ningxia Key Laboratory of Cerebrocranial Disease, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- *Correspondence: Tao Sun,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam in Critically Ill Adult Patients: An Intensive Care Unit Clinical Study. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12031208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in critically ill adult intensive care patients and to identify pathophysiological factors affecting its kinetics. Fourteen critically ill patients in an intensive care unit were enrolled in the study and received intravenous levetiracetam. Blood samples were collected at specific time points to determine the levetiracetam pharmacokinetics. Patient characteristics such as renal function, demographics, disease severity, organ dysfunction, and biochemical laboratory tests were evaluated for their influence on the kinetics of levetiracetam. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) had a statistically significant (p = 0.001) effect on levetiracetam clearance. None of the other patient characteristics had a statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics. Simulations of dosing regimens revealed that even typically administered doses of levetiracetam may result in significantly increased concentrations and risk of drug toxicity in patients with impaired renal function. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score differed significantly among the three groups with different epileptic activity (p = 0.034). The same groups also differed in terms of renal function (p = 0.031). Renal dysfunction should be considered when designing levetiracetam dosage. Patients with a low APACHE II score had the lowest risk of experiencing epileptic seizures.
Collapse
|
7
|
Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Levetiracetam in Portuguese Refractory Epileptic Patients: Effect of Gender, Weight and Concomitant Therapy. Pharmaceutics 2020; 12:pharmaceutics12100943. [PMID: 33019727 PMCID: PMC7601255 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12100943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Levetiracetam is a second-generation antiepileptic drug, widely used in the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsy due to its pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. Its pharmacokinetic monitoring is ascribed as useful to personalize its dosing regimen. The aim of the present study was to describe, for the first time, the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in Portuguese refractory epileptic patients. Therefore, a retrospective study was carried out on 65 Portuguese refractory epileptic patients (pharmacokinetic study: 48; validation study: 17) admitted to the Refractory Epilepsy Centre of the Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. The pharmacokinetic parameters of levetiracetam were estimated by applying a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination analysis. Male patients showed higher distribution volume (Vd/F) and oral clearance (CL/F) than female patients (median Vd/F: 52.40 L in males and 38.60 L in females, p = 0.011; median CL/F: 4.71 L/h in males and 3.91 L/h in females, p = 0.028). Higher values of Vd/F (p = 0.026) and CL/F (p = 0.003) were also found in overweight patients relative to normal weight and obese patients. Carbamazepine was the co-administered antiepileptic drug that mostly affected the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam, increasing both Vd/F (61.30 L with carbamazepine and 39.10 L without carbamazepine, p = 0.007) and CL/F (6.71 L/h with carbamazepine and 3.91 L/h without carbamazepine, p < 0.001). The pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam was affected by gender, body mass index, and co-administration of carbamazepine. This study highlights the impact of several factors on the CL/ and Vd/F of levetiracetam when administered to refractory epileptic patients. The importance of its pharmacokinetic monitoring in clinical pharmacy stands out, thereby enabling the optimization of antiepileptic drug therapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
DJohn J, Ibrahim R, Patel P, DeHoff K, Kolbe N. Administration of Levetiracetam in Traumatic Brain Injury: Is it Warranted? Cureus 2020; 12:e9117. [PMID: 32789060 PMCID: PMC7417124 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antiepileptic agents are recommended to prevent early post-traumatic seizures (PTS) within seven days of injury in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). These agents are not routinely recommended for patients with mild-to-moderate TBI, defined as Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score > 8. At St. Joseph Mercy Oakland, levetiracetam (LEV) is commonly prescribed to prevent PTS. The objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of LEV use in patients with mild, moderate, and severe TBI. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated the use of LEV in adult patients admitted with TBI over a five-year period. Patients who were younger than 18 years, had a history of seizures, were transferred to a tertiary center, or succumbed to their injuries were excluded. The primary outcome was appropriateness of LEV use. Secondary outcomes included duration of LEV treatment and rate of seizures. Results Of the 448 patients evaluated, 36 patients were excluded. Of the 412 included patients, 403 (97.8%) had a non-severe TBI, defined as GCS score > 8. In patients with non-severe TBI, 153 (38%) received LEV and 94 (23.3%) received LEV for more than seven days. Additionally, 105 (26.1%) patients with non-severe TBI were discharged with a prescription for LEV despite not having a seizure during hospitalization. All six patients with non-severe TBI who experienced a seizure were receiving LEV. Conclusions Inappropriate use of LEV is common in patients admitted with non-severe TBI, with many patients continuing LEV post-discharge. With careful patient selection, patients with mild and moderate TBI likely do not need seizure prophylaxis with LEV. Education on appropriate indication and duration of LEV in patients with TBI is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason DJohn
- General Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland, Pontiac, USA
| | - Ramzi Ibrahim
- Internal Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland, Pontiac, USA
| | - Prasanna Patel
- Internal Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland, Pontiac, USA
| | | | - Nina Kolbe
- Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland, Pontiac, USA
| |
Collapse
|