1
|
Rasmi Y, di Bari I, Faisal S, Haque M, Aramwit P, da Silva A, Roshani Asl E. Herbal-based therapeutics for diabetic patients with SARS-Cov-2 infection. Mol Biol Rep 2024; 51:316. [PMID: 38376656 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-024-09291-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Human SARS Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected more than 170 million people worldwide, being responsible for about 3.5 million deaths so far. Despite ongoing investigations, there is still more to understand the mechanism of COVID-19 infection completely. However, it has been evidenced that SARS-CoV-2 can cause Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) notably in diabetic people. Approximately 35% of the patients who died of this disease had diabetes. A growing number of studies have evidenced that hyperglycemia is a significant risk factor for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and plays a key role in COVID-19 mortality and diabetes comorbidity. The uncontrolled hyperglycemia can produce low-grade inflammation and impaired immunity-mediated cytokine storm that fail multiple organs and sudden death in diabetic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. More importantly, SARS-CoV-2 infection and interaction with ACE2 receptors also contribute to pancreatic and metabolic impairment. Thus, using of diabetes medications has been suggested to be beneficial in the better management of diabetic COVID-19 patients. Herbal treatments, as safe and affordable therapeutic agents, have recently attracted a lot of attention in this field. Accordingly, in this review, we intend to have a deep look into the molecular mechanisms of diabetic complications in SARS-CoV-2 infection and explore the therapeutic potentials of herbal medications and natural products in the management of diabetic COVID-19 patients based on recent studies and the existing clinical evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousef Rasmi
- Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Orūmīyeh, Iran
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Orūmīyeh, Iran
| | - Ighli di Bari
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Shah Faisal
- Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Munima Haque
- Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Pornanong Aramwit
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Center of Excellence in Bioactive Resources for Innovative Clinical Applications, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- The Academy of Science, The Royal Society of Thailand, Dusit, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Aline da Silva
- Department of Soil and Rural, Centre for Agrarian Science, Campus II, Federal University of Paraiba, Areia, João Pessoa, Brazil.
| | - Elmira Roshani Asl
- Department of Biochemistry, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rasheed N, Khan J, Yusuf A, Khan AS, Mustajab A, Majeed R, Hashmi AA. AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine and Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Clinical Study Regarding Vaccine Side Effects. Cureus 2024; 16:e51583. [PMID: 38313879 PMCID: PMC10836246 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major public health problem worldwide, and vaccination is currently the most effective way to control its spread and reduce its severity. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent chronic disease that poses a significant health risk and is a frequent comorbidity in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the frequency of local and systemic side effects of the AstraZeneca vaccine among diabetic and non-diabetic participants. Methodology This multicenter study was designed as a cross-sectional prospective study and was conducted in Pakistan using a non-probability consecutive sampling method. The study duration was eight months from August 1, 2022, to March 31, 2023. A total of 700 participants who received both (first and second) doses of the AstraZeneca immunization were included in the study. An independent t-test was applied to determine the association between the means and standard deviations of age, height, weight, and duration of DM and hypertension. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the association between local and systemic side effects. Results Among the 700 participants, 173 (49.4%) males and 177 (50.6%) females had diabetes, whereas 183 (52.3%) males and 167 (47.7%) females did not have DM; their mean ages were 46.95 ± 12.73 years (diabetics) and 38.10 ± 14.14 years (non-diabetics). The most frequent adverse effects of the AstraZeneca vaccine after the first dose were pain at the injection site, reported by 259 (74.0%) diabetics and 226 (64.6%) non-diabetic participants; however, after the second dose, injection site swelling in 170 (48.6%) diabetic and 163 (46.6%) non-diabetic recipients was the most commonly reported local side effects. Conclusions This study concluded that concurrent medical conditions such as DM had substantially more local and systemic side effects than those without the disease. After receiving both doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine, the most frequently reported local side effects in both diabetic and non-diabetic participants were pain, swelling, and burning at the injection site, followed by systemic side effects such as fever.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabila Rasheed
- Department of Medicine, Basic Health Sciences, and Neuropharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ITA
| | - Javeria Khan
- Anatomy, Dow International Dental College, Karachi, PAK
| | - Anusha Yusuf
- Internal Medicine, Essa General Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | | | - Arhum Mustajab
- Internal Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derbyshire, GBR
| | - Rabika Majeed
- Family Medicine, Al-Samdah Health Center Duba, Ministry of Health, Duba, SAU
| | - Atif A Hashmi
- Pathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akhtar SM, Gazzaz ZJ, Baig M, Majeed R, Hashmi AA. Association Between Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Effects and Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e48263. [PMID: 38054118 PMCID: PMC10695283 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) triggered the contagion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which killed many individuals globally. The Pfizer BioNTech vaccine was the first messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based vaccine that boosted immunity against various adverse reactions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of Pfizer vaccine side effects among participants with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods This multicenter study was cross-sectional and was performed using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique. The study duration was six months, from October 1, 2022, to March 31, 2023. A total of 750 participants who received both doses of the Pfizer vaccine were included in the study. Demographic details such as gender, age, comorbidities, preceding COVID-19 infection, and the occurrence of any local and systemic side effects of the first and second doses of vaccine were recorded. The association between local and general side effects and the presence of DM was assessed using the chi-square test. Results Of the 750 participants included in the study, 289 (77.1%) were males with diabetes mellitus (DM), and 217 (57.9%) were non-diabetic participants; however, 86 (22.9%) females had DM, and 158 (42.1%) were non-diabetic; their mean ages were 48.23 ± 16.22 and 37.56 ± 12.15 years, respectively. The most commonly occurring side effects after receiving the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine were: injection site burning in 251 (66.9%) diabetic and 254 (67.7%) non-diabetic participants. Likewise, the frequency of side effects of the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine showed that the most commonly reported side effects were: muscle pain, found in 240 (64.0%) diabetic patients and 194 (51.7%) non-diabetics, with a statistically significant association (p =0.001). Conclusion This study concluded that participants with DM had local and general adverse effects considerably more frequently than those without DM. The most frequently observed adverse effects in both diabetic and non-diabetic participants were injection site burning, rashes, muscle pain, and fever after receiving both doses of the Pfizer vaccine. Moreover, most of the side effects were minor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zohair J Gazzaz
- Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Mukhtiar Baig
- Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Rabika Majeed
- Family Medicine, Al-Samdah Health Center Duba, Ministry of Health, Duba, SAU
| | - Atif A Hashmi
- Pathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Syed AS, Sultana S, Begum A, Nadeem K, Ara J, Askarey SH, Siddiqui AA, Anwar A, Hashmi AA. Severity of Adverse Effects of Sinovac COVID-19 Vaccine in Postmenopausal Women: A Multicenter Experience From Pakistan. Cureus 2023; 15:e46682. [PMID: 37942377 PMCID: PMC10629371 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The most significant element in halting the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic was the availability of reliable and efficient vaccines. Vaccine acceptability is influenced by many factors, including perceptions of the vaccine's safety and side effects. Adverse reactions to vaccines can vary with regard to the type, although they are frequently mild, localized, temporary, and self-limiting. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of side effects experienced by postmenopausal women after receiving the Sinovac vaccine. Methods This multicenter, prospective cross-sectional study was carried out at multiple centers in Karachi, Pakistan. In this study, the non-probability sampling method was used. The study continued from August 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023, for six months. The study comprised 600 postmenopausal women over the age of 50 years who received two doses of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccination. Demographic parameters such as gender, the existence of comorbidities, and local and systemic side effects in postmenopausal women were documented as frequencies and percentages. Age, weight, and duration of comorbidities are expressed as means and standard deviations. Results The study findings showed that the mean age of study participants was 63.93 ± 8.24 years. There were related comorbidities with hypertension and diabetes mellitus in 181 (30.2%) and 40 (6.7%) women, respectively. Fever was the most often reported side effect, with 349 (58.2%) participants reporting it and 198 (56.7%) participants reporting it as mild. After the second dose, 234 (39.5%) participants reported fever as their most frequent adverse effect, and 158 (67.5%) of them reported it was mild. Conclusion This study concluded that the most commonly reported side effects among postmenopausal women were fever, pain, and swelling at the injection site after getting either dose of Sinovac vaccine. These overall side effects were generally mild to moderate in intensity, not life-threatening, and did not require hospitalization, although fever was reported in severe intensity in some cases, particularly after the first dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asma Safdar Syed
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chiniot General Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Shazia Sultana
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziauddin University, Karachi, PAK
| | - Amna Begum
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Khasheaa Nadeem
- Internal Medicine, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, PAK
| | - Jamal Ara
- Internal Medicine, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | | | | | - Adnan Anwar
- Physiology, Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, PAK
- Internal Medicine, Essa General Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Atif A Hashmi
- Pathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Masood A, Chohan HK, Mubeen M, Faizan M, Moin S, Chohan MK, Syed T, Anwar A, Hashmi AA. Sinovac COVID-19 Side Effects in Hypertensive Patients: An Observational Study From Pakistan. Cureus 2023; 15:e40444. [PMID: 37456424 PMCID: PMC10349340 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The most important factor in combating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was the provision of safe and effective vaccines. The acceptance of vaccines is impacted by several variables, including beliefs about the vaccine's safety and adverse effects. Vaccine side effects can vary depending on the type, but they are often moderate, localized, transient, and self-limiting. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of side effects experienced after receiving the Sinovac vaccine by participants hypertensive and non-hypertensive participants. Methodology This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study that was performed using non-probability sampling. The study duration was six months from May 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022. The study involved 600 individuals who had either received the first or second dose of the Sinovac vaccine. For categorical data, frequencies and percentages were documented. The chi-square test was applied to determine the association between local and systemic side effects among hypertensive and non-hypertensive participants. Results The study findings showed that out of 600 participants, there were 187 (62.3%) males and 113 (37.7%) females with hypertension, and 222 (74.0%) males and 78 (26.0%) females without hypertension, with a significant association (p = 0.002). Following the first dose of the Sinovac vaccine, fever was the most commonly reported side effect in 153 (51.0%) hypertensive participants and 62 (20.7%) non-hypertensive participants, with a significant association (p < 0.001). Similarly, following the second dose of the Sinovac vaccine, fever was the most commonly reported side effect in 108 (36.0%) hypertensive participants and 57 (19.0%) non-hypertensive participants, with a significant association (p < 0.001). Conclusions This study concluded that the presence of hypertension significantly increased the manifestations of local and systemic side effects compared with non-hypertensive participants. Moreover, fever, pain, and swelling at the injection site were the most commonly reported side effects after receiving the first and second doses of the Sinovac vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahsan Masood
- Internal Medicine, Gomel State Medical University, Gomel, BLR
| | | | - Muhammad Mubeen
- Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK
| | - Muhammad Faizan
- Public Health Sciences, Health Department of Sindh, Karachi, PAK
| | - Subhana Moin
- Dentistry, Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, PAK
| | | | - Tatheer Syed
- Public Health Sciences, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, PAK
| | - Adnan Anwar
- Physiology, Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, PAK
- Internal Medicine, Essa General Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Atif A Hashmi
- Pathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chohan HK, Jamal A, Mubeen M, Khan MU, Junaid M, Chohan MK, Imran A, Aslam A, Anwar A, Hashmi AA. The Common Systemic and Local Adverse Effects of the Sinovac COVID-19 Vaccine: An Observational Study From Pakistan. Cureus 2023; 15:e38564. [PMID: 37284387 PMCID: PMC10239542 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccination acts by boosting the capacity of a person's immune system to identify and effectively resist infection-causing bacteria and viruses, as it stimulates the immune system to respond to the vaccine's antigens. The immunological response may include local and systemic symptoms, including pain at the injection site and fever, respectively. The Sinovac vaccine is an inactivated virus vaccine made in China and is one of the most widely used vaccines in many countries; however, the side effects of the Sinovac vaccine have not been well-studied in our population. Therefore, this study assessed the prevalence of side effects experienced by participants after receiving the Sinovac vaccine. Methodology This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted using a non-probability sampling method. The duration of the study was six months from May 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022. A total of 800 participants who were completely vaccinated with the Sinovac vaccine were included in the study. For categorical data, frequencies and percentages were documented, while for continuous data, such as age, height, weight, and the duration of comorbidities, means and standard deviations were evaluated. Results The study findings showed that out of 800 participants, 534 (66.8%) were males and 266 (33.3%) were females, with a mean age of 41.20 ± 13.70 years. Among them, 162 (20.3%) had hypertension, and 104 (13.0%) had diabetes. Following the first dose of the Sinovac vaccine, fever was the most commonly reported side effect in 350 (43.8%) participants. Additionally, pain at the injection site in 238 (29.8%) participants, followed by swelling at the injection site in 228 (28.5%) recipients, were among other common side effects. Following the second dose of the Sinovac vaccine, fever was the most commonly reported side effect in 262 (32.8%) participants. Conclusions This study concluded that fever was the most frequent systemic side effect, whereas pain and swelling at the injection site were the most frequent local side effects following the administration of the first and second doses of the Sinovac vaccine. Both dosages of Sinovac were well-tolerated, and the majority of the adverse effects were minor and self-limiting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aisha Jamal
- Internal Medicine, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, PAK
| | - Muhammad Mubeen
- Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK
| | | | - Muhammad Junaid
- Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK
| | | | | | - Anum Aslam
- Internal Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| | - Adnan Anwar
- Physiology, Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, PAK
| | - Atif A Hashmi
- Pathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| |
Collapse
|