Nutrition Care Management Practices for In-Patients with Dysphagia in Korean Clinical Settings

A Knowledge-based Decision Support System for recommending safe recipes to individuals with dysphagia

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is a disorder that can be associated to several pathological conditions, including neuromuscular diseases, with significant impact on quality of life. Dysphagia often leads to malnutrition, as a consequence of the dietary changes made by patients or their caregivers, who may deliberately decide to reduce or avoid specific food consistencies (because they are not perceived as safe), and the lack of knowledge in how to process foods are critics. Such dietary changes often result in unbalanced nutrients intake, which can have significant consequences for frail patients. This paper presents the development of a prototypical novel ontology-based Decision Support System (DSS) to support neuromuscular patients with dysphagia (following a per-oral nutrition) and their caregivers in preparing nutritionally balanced and safe meals.

METHOD

After reviewing scientific literature, we developed in collaboration with Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) specialists, neurologists, and dieticians the DSS formalizes expert knowledge to suggest recipes that are considered safe according to patient's consistency limitations and dysphagia severity and also nutritionally well-balanced.

RESULTS

The prototype can be accessed via digital applications both by physicians to generate and verify the recommendations, and by the patients and their caregivers to follow the step-by-step procedures to autonomously prepare and process one or more recipe. The system is evaluated with 9 clinicians to assess the quality of the DSS's suggested recipes and its acceptance in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results suggest a global positive outcome for the recipes inferred by the DSS and a good usability of the system.

Reimagining Nutrition Care and Mealtimes in Long-Term Care

Poor food and fluid intake and subsequent malnutrition and dehydration of residents are common, longstanding challenges in long-term care (LTC; eg, nursing homes, care homes, skilled nursing facilities). Institutional factors like inadequate nutrition care processes, food quality, eating assistance, and mealtime experiences, such as staff and resident interactions (ie, relationship-centered care) are partially responsible and are all modifiable. Evidence-based guidelines on nutrition and hydration for older adults, including those living with dementia, outline best practices. However, these guidelines are not sector-specific, and implementation in LTC requires consideration of feasibility in this setting, including the impact of government, LTC home characteristics, and other systems and structures that affect how care is delivered. It is increasingly acknowledged that interconnected relationships among residents, family members, and staff influence care activities and can offer opportunities for improving resident nutrition. In this special article, we reimagine LTC nutrition by reframing the evidence-based recommendations into relationship-centered care practices for nutrition care processes, food and menus, eating assistance, and mealtime experience. We then expand this evidence into actions for implementation, rating these on their feasibility and identifying the entities that are accountable. A few of the recommended activities were rated as highly feasible (6 of 27), whereas almost half were rated moderate (12/27) and the remainder low (9/27) owing to the need for additional staff and/or expert staff (including funding), or infrastructure or material (eg, food ingredients) investment. Government funding, policy, and standards are needed to improve nutrition care. LTC home leadership needs to designate roles, initiate training, and support best practices. Accountability will result from enforcement of policies through auditing of practice. Further evidence on these desirable nutrition care and mealtime actions and their benefit to residents' nutrition and well-being is required.

Thickened liquids: do they still have a place in the dysphagia toolkit?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of commercially or naturally thickened liquids is a well-established treatment for patients with dysphagia to fluids, the aim of which is to improve swallow safety by minimizing risk of aspiration. Although the most recent systematic reviews conclude that this treatment lacks evidential support and leads to patient-reported worsening health and quality of life, thickened liquids continue to be used with patients with dysphagia across clinical settings. This review briefly summarizes the evidence and considers potential reasons for the apparent mismatch between the evidence and clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Continuing practice with thickened liquids is influenced by a range of factors, including gaps in clinical knowledge, inadequate patient involvement, a culture of common practice and a reliance on invalid surrogate studies or research lacking a credible association between thickened liquids and clinically meaningful endpoints.

SUMMARY

While awaiting further research, clinical decision-making about thickened liquids can be improved by considering the evidence of clinically meaningful endpoints, promoting shared decision-making with patients and underpinning practice with knowledge about the complex relationship between dysphagia, aspiration and pneumonia.