1
|
Krutyanskiy V, Galli M, Krcmarsky V, Baier S, Fioretto DA, Pu Y, Mazloom A, Sekatski P, Canteri M, Teller M, Schupp J, Bate J, Meraner M, Sangouard N, Lanyon BP, Northup TE. Entanglement of Trapped-Ion Qubits Separated by 230 Meters. Phys Rev Lett 2023; 130:050803. [PMID: 36800448 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.130.050803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
We report on an elementary quantum network of two atomic ions separated by 230 m. The ions are trapped in different buildings and connected with 520(2) m of optical fiber. At each network node, the electronic state of an ion is entangled with the polarization state of a single cavity photon; subsequent to interference of the photons at a beam splitter, photon detection heralds entanglement between the two ions. Fidelities of up to (88.0+2.2-4.7)% are achieved with respect to a maximally entangled Bell state, with a success probability of 4×10^{-5}. We analyze the routes to improve these metrics, paving the way for long-distance networks of entangled quantum processors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Krutyanskiy
- Institut für Quantenoptik und Quanteninformation, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Technikerstraße 21a, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Galli
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - V Krcmarsky
- Institut für Quantenoptik und Quanteninformation, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Technikerstraße 21a, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - S Baier
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - D A Fioretto
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Y Pu
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - A Mazloom
- Department of Physics, Georgetown University, 37th and O Streets NW, Washington, D.C. 20057, USA
| | - P Sekatski
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Canteri
- Institut für Quantenoptik und Quanteninformation, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Technikerstraße 21a, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Teller
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - J Schupp
- Institut für Quantenoptik und Quanteninformation, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Technikerstraße 21a, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - J Bate
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Meraner
- Institut für Quantenoptik und Quanteninformation, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Technikerstraße 21a, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - N Sangouard
- Institut de Physique Théorique, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - B P Lanyon
- Institut für Quantenoptik und Quanteninformation, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Technikerstraße 21a, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - T E Northup
- Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ho J, Reddy J, Mazloom A, Allen P, Milgrom S, Smith G, Medeiros L, Young K, Fowler N, Dabaja B, Pinnix C. Radiation Therapy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Primary Testicular Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
5
|
Dabaja B, Voong R, Shihadeh F, Arzu I, Pinnix C, Mazloom A, Medeiros L, Romaguera J, Rodriguez M, Allen P. Radiation Therapy Is a Very Effective Modality in the Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma, >80% Complete Disappearance of Disease Site in Heavily Pretreated Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.1470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
6
|
Paulino A, Terashima K, Mazloom A, Su J, Dauser R, Okcu M, whitehead W, Teh B, Baxter P, Chintagumpala M. Impact of Target Volume on Local Control After Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Pediatric Low-grade Glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
9
|
Phan J, Mazloom A, Shihadeh F, Munsell M, Rodriguez A, Fayad L, Fowler N, Dabaja B. Outcome of Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma is Directly Related to Type of Chemotherapy and the use of Radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
11
|
Paulino A, Mazloom A, South M, Teh B, Okcu F, Su J, Butler E, Chintagumpala M. Patterns of Failure after Craniospinal Irradiation, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Boost and Chemotherapy for Medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
12
|
Abstract
2065 Background: Medulloblastoma is the most common childhood intracranial tumor to spread extraneurally. Information regarding prognostic factors and best therapeutic approach of extraneural metastasis (ENM) of medulloblastoma is mostly limited to case reports. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive literature review and analysis of reported cases dealing with ENM to identify the characteristics, prognostic factors, optimal treatment modalities, and survival of these patients. Methods: A PubMed search of English language articles from 1963–2007 was performed, yielding 47 articles with 119 patients. Factors analyzed included age, time interval to ENM, CNS involvement at the time of ENM, location of ENM, treatment, and outcome. Results: Location of ENM included bone in 84%, bone marrow in 27%, lung in 6%, liver in 6%, and lymph nodes in 15%. Of patients with available data regarding location of RT after ENM, 87% of patients received this treatment to the site of ENM. The 1-year disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after the diagnosis of ENM was 35% and 42%, respectively. The 1-year OS for patients with and without radiotherapy (RT) after ENM was 58% and 35%, respectively (p = 0.019). For patients without CNS involvement at the time of ENM the 1-year OS for those treated with and without RT was 82% and 51%, respectively (p = 0.030), however RT did not significantly improve OS for those with CNS involvement. ENM in the lung or liver was found to be a negative prognostic factor (p = 0.002). 1-year OS of patients with time interval to ENM of <18 months was 25% while those with time interval greater than or equal to 18 months it was 61% (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Negative prognostic factors for patients with ENM include CNS involvement at the time of ENM, lung or liver involvement, and duration to ENM <18 months. Patients without CNS involvement who received RT after ENM had an OS and DFS benefit compared to those not receiving RT. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - B. S. Teh
- Methodist Hospital System, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|