1
|
Standing JF, Buggiotti L, Guerra-Assuncao JA, Woodall M, Ellis S, Agyeman AA, Miller C, Okechukwu M, Kirkpatrick E, Jacobs AI, Williams CA, Roy S, Martin-Bernal LM, Williams R, Smith CM, Sanderson T, Ashford FB, Emmanuel B, Afzal ZM, Shields A, Richter AG, Dorward J, Gbinigie O, Van Hecke O, Lown M, Francis N, Jani B, Richards DB, Rahman NM, Yu LM, Thomas NPB, Hart ND, Evans P, Andersson M, Hayward G, Hood K, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Little P, Hobbs FDR, Khoo S, Butler C, Lowe DM, Breuer J. Randomized controlled trial of molnupiravir SARS-CoV-2 viral and antibody response in at-risk adult outpatients. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1652. [PMID: 38396069 PMCID: PMC10891158 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45641-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Viral clearance, antibody response and the mutagenic effect of molnupiravir has not been elucidated in at-risk populations. Non-hospitalised participants within 5 days of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms randomised to receive molnupiravir (n = 253) or Usual Care (n = 324) were recruited to study viral and antibody dynamics and the effect of molnupiravir on viral whole genome sequence from 1437 viral genomes. Molnupiravir accelerates viral load decline, but virus is detectable by Day 5 in most cases. At Day 14 (9 days post-treatment), molnupiravir is associated with significantly higher viral persistence and significantly lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titres compared to Usual Care. Serial sequencing reveals increased mutagenesis with molnupiravir treatment. Persistence of detectable viral RNA at Day 14 in the molnupiravir group is associated with higher transition mutations following treatment cessation. Viral viability at Day 14 is similar in both groups with post-molnupiravir treated samples cultured up to 9 days post cessation of treatment. The current 5-day molnupiravir course is too short. Longer courses should be tested to reduce the risk of potentially transmissible molnupiravir-mutated variants being generated. Trial registration: ISRCTN30448031.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Laura Buggiotti
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jose Afonso Guerra-Assuncao
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maximillian Woodall
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel Ellis
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Akosua A Agyeman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Charles Miller
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mercy Okechukwu
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emily Kirkpatrick
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Amy I Jacobs
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte A Williams
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sunando Roy
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Luz M Martin-Bernal
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Williams
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claire M Smith
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Fiona B Ashford
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Beena Emmanuel
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zaheer M Afzal
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adrian Shields
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alex G Richter
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jienchi Dorward
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Oghenekome Gbinigie
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Oliver Van Hecke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Lown
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nick Francis
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Bhautesh Jani
- School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Duncan B Richards
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Najib M Rahman
- Respiratory Trials Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Nigel D Hart
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences. Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Philip Evans
- APEx (Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- National Institute of Health and Care Research, Clinical Research Network, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Gail Hayward
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| | | | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - F D Richard Hobbs
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Saye Khoo
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Liverpool and Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David M Lowe
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, UK
| | - Judith Breuer
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang S, Agyeman AA, Hadjichrysanthou C, Standing JF. SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamic modeling to inform model selection and timing and efficacy of antiviral therapy. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2023; 12:1450-1460. [PMID: 37534815 PMCID: PMC10583246 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Mathematical models of viral dynamics have been reported to describe adequately the dynamic changes of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 viral load within an individual host. In this study, eight published viral dynamic models were assessed, and model selection was performed. Viral load data were collected from a community surveillance study, including 2155 measurements from 162 patients (124 household and 38 non-household contacts). An extended version of the target-cell limited model that includes an eclipse phase and an immune response component that enhances viral clearance described best the data. In general, the parameter estimates showed good precision (relative standard error <10), apart from the death rate of infected cells. The parameter estimates were used to simulate the outcomes of a clinical trial of the antiviral tixagevimab-cilgavimab, a monoclonal antibody combination which blocks infection of the target cells by neutralizing the virus. The simulated outcome of the effectiveness of the antiviral therapy in controlling viral replication was in a good agreement with the clinical trial data. Early treatment with high antiviral efficacy is important for desired therapeutic outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengyuan Zhang
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of PharmacyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Akosua A. Agyeman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Christoforos Hadjichrysanthou
- Department of MathematicsUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public HealthImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Agyeman AA, López-Causapé C, Rogers KE, Lucas DD, Cortés-Lara S, Gomis-Font MA, Fraile-Ribot P, Figuerola J, Lang Y, Franklyn ERT, Lee WL, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Bulitta JB, Boyce JD, Nation RL, Oliver A, Landersdorfer CB. Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus tobramycin against free-floating and biofilm bacteria of hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic strains: Resistance mechanisms and synergistic activity. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2023; 62:106887. [PMID: 37315906 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Acute exacerbations of biofilm-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) have limited treatment options. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (alone and with a second antibiotic) has not yet been investigated against hypermutable clinical P. aeruginosa isolates in biofilm growth. This study aimed to evaluate, using an in vitro dynamic biofilm model, ceftolozane/tazobactam alone and in combination with tobramycin at simulated representative lung fluid pharmacokinetics against free-floating (planktonic) and biofilm states of two hypermutable P. aeruginosa epidemic strains (LES-1 and CC274) from adolescents with CF. METHODS Regimens were intravenous ceftolozane/tazobactam 4.5 g/day continuous infusion, inhaled tobramycin 300 mg 12-hourly, intravenous tobramycin 10 mg/kg 24-hourly, and both ceftolozane/tazobactam-tobramycin combinations. The isolates were susceptible to both antibiotics. Total and less-susceptible free-floating and biofilm bacteria were quantified over 120-168 h. Ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance mechanisms were investigated by whole-genome sequencing. Mechanism-based modelling of bacterial viable counts was performed. RESULTS Monotherapies of ceftolozane/tazobactam and tobramycin did not sufficiently suppress emergence of less-susceptible subpopulations, although inhaled tobramycin was more effective than intravenous tobramycin. Ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance development was associated with classical (AmpC overexpression plus structural modification) and novel (CpxR mutations) mechanisms depending on the strain. Against both isolates, combination regimens demonstrated synergy and completely suppressed the emergence of ceftolozane/tazobactam and tobramycin less-susceptible free-floating and biofilm bacterial subpopulations. CONCLUSION Mechanism-based modelling incorporating subpopulation and mechanistic synergy well described the antibacterial effects of all regimens against free-floating and biofilm bacterial states. These findings support further investigation of ceftolozane/tazobactam in combination with tobramycin against biofilm-associated P. aeruginosa infections in adolescents with CF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akosua A Agyeman
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carla López-Causapé
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; CIBER Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Kate E Rogers
- Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Deanna Deveson Lucas
- Monash Bioinformatics Platform, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sara Cortés-Lara
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; CIBER Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria A Gomis-Font
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; CIBER Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Fraile-Ribot
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; CIBER Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Figuerola
- Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Yinzhi Lang
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Eva R T Franklyn
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wee Leng Lee
- Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jieqiang Zhou
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Yongzhen Zhang
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Jurgen B Bulitta
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - John D Boyce
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roger L Nation
- Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Antonio Oliver
- Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain; CIBER Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Cornelia B Landersdorfer
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agyeman AA, You T, Chan PLS, Lonsdale DO, Hadjichrysanthou C, Mahungu T, Wey EQ, Lowe DM, Lipman MCI, Breuer J, Kloprogge F, Standing JF. Comparative assessment of viral dynamic models for SARS-CoV-2 for pharmacodynamic assessment in early treatment trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:5428-5433. [PMID: 36040430 PMCID: PMC9538685 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Pharmacometric analyses of time series viral load data may detect drug effects with greater power than approaches using single time points. Because SARS-CoV-2 viral load rapidly rises and then falls, viral dynamic models have been used. We compared different modelling approaches when analysing Phase II-type viral dynamic data. Using two SARS-CoV-2 datasets of viral load starting within 7 days of symptoms, we fitted the slope-intercept exponential decay (SI), reduced target cell limited (rTCL), target cell limited (TCL) and TCL with eclipse phase (TCLE) models using nlmixr. Model performance was assessed via Bayesian information criterion (BIC), visual predictive checks (VPCs), goodness-of-fit plots, and parameter precision. The most complex (TCLE) model had the highest BIC for both datasets. The estimated viral decline rate was similar for all models except the TCL model for dataset A with a higher rate (median [range] day-1 : dataset A; 0.63 [0.56-1.84]; dataset B: 0.81 [0.74-0.85]). Our findings suggest simple models should be considered during pharmacodynamic model development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akosua A Agyeman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tao You
- Beyond Consulting Ltd., Cheshire, UK.,Medical Research Council, UK
| | | | - Dagan O Lonsdale
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St George's University of London, London, UK.,Department of Intensive Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Christoforos Hadjichrysanthou
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tabitha Mahungu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Free Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emmanuel Q Wey
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Free Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Division of Infection and Immunity University College London, London, UK
| | - David M Lowe
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Campus, London, UK
| | - Marc C I Lipman
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,UCL Respiratory, University College London, Royal Free Campus, London, UK
| | - Judy Breuer
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Microbiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Frank Kloprogge
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lowe DM, Brown LAK, Chowdhury K, Davey S, Yee P, Ikeji F, Ndoutoumou A, Shah D, Lennon A, Rai A, Agyeman AA, Checkley A, Longley N, Dehbi HM, Freemantle N, Breuer J, Standing JF. Favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or combination therapy (FLARE): A randomised, double-blind, 2 × 2 factorial placebo-controlled trial of early antiviral therapy in COVID-19. PLoS Med 2022; 19:e1004120. [PMID: 36260627 PMCID: PMC9629589 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early antiviral treatment is effective for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) but currently available agents are expensive. Favipiravir is routinely used in many countries, but efficacy is unproven. Antiviral combinations have not been systematically studied. We aimed to evaluate the effect of favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir or the combination of both agents on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load trajectory when administered early. METHODS AND FINDINGS We conducted a Phase 2, proof of principle, randomised, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, double-blind trial of ambulatory outpatients with early COVID-19 (within 7 days of symptom onset) at 2 sites in the United Kingdom. Participants were randomised using a centralised online process to receive: favipiravir (1,800 mg twice daily on Day 1 followed by 400 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7) plus lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200 mg/50 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7), favipiravir plus lopinavir-ritonavir placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir plus favipiravir placebo, or both placebos. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 viral load at Day 5, accounting for baseline viral load. Between 6 October 2020 and 4 November 2021, we recruited 240 participants. For the favipiravir+lopinavir-ritonavir, favipiravir+placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo, and placebo-only arms, we recruited 61, 59, 60, and 60 participants and analysed 55, 56, 55, and 58 participants, respectively, who provided viral load measures at Day 1 and Day 5. In the primary analysis, the mean viral load in the favipiravir+placebo arm had changed by -0.57 log10 (95% CI -1.21 to 0.07, p = 0.08) and in the lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo arm by -0.18 log10 (95% CI -0.82 to 0.46, p = 0.58) compared to the placebo arm at Day 5. There was no significant interaction between favipiravir and lopinavir-ritonavir (interaction coefficient term: 0.59 log10, 95% CI -0.32 to 1.50, p = 0.20). More participants had undetectable virus at Day 5 in the favipiravir+placebo arm compared to placebo only (46.3% versus 26.9%, odds ratio (OR): 2.47, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.65; p = 0.03). Adverse events were observed more frequently with lopinavir-ritonavir, mainly gastrointestinal disturbance. Favipiravir drug levels were lower in the combination arm than the favipiravir monotherapy arm, possibly due to poor absorption. The major limitation was that the study population was relatively young and healthy compared to those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS At the current doses, no treatment significantly reduced viral load in the primary analysis. Favipiravir requires further evaluation with consideration of dose escalation. Lopinavir-ritonavir administration was associated with lower plasma favipiravir concentrations. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04499677 EudraCT: 2020-002106-68.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. Lowe
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Li-An K. Brown
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kashfia Chowdhury
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie Davey
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Yee
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Felicia Ikeji
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amalia Ndoutoumou
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Divya Shah
- Department of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander Lennon
- Department of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Abhulya Rai
- Department of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Akosua A. Agyeman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Checkley
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Longley
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hakim-Moulay Dehbi
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Freemantle
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Breuer
- Department of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Agyeman AA, Rogers KE, Tait JR, Bergen PJ, Kirkpatrick CM, Wallis SC, Bulitta JB, Paterson DL, Lipman J, Nation RL, Roberts JA, Landersdorfer CB. Evaluation of Meropenem‐Ciprofloxacin Combination Dosage Regimens for the Pharmacokinetics of Critically Ill Patients With Augmented Renal Clearance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2021; 109:1104-1115. [DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Akosua A. Agyeman
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - Kate E. Rogers
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - Jessica R. Tait
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - Phillip J. Bergen
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - Carl M. Kirkpatrick
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - Steven C. Wallis
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Jürgen B. Bulitta
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research College of Pharmacy University of Florida Orlando Florida USA
| | - David L. Paterson
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Jeffrey Lipman
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Roger L. Nation
- Drug Delivery, Disposition, and Dynamics Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical SciencesMonash University Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - Jason A. Roberts
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Cornelia B. Landersdorfer
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences Monash University Parkville Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Agyeman AA, Laar A, Ofori-Asenso R. Will COVID-19 be a litmus test for post-Ebola sub-Saharan Africa? J Med Virol 2020; 92:1373-1375. [PMID: 32196700 PMCID: PMC7228244 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Akosua A Agyeman
- Center for Medicines Use and Safety, Monash Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Amos Laar
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Richard Ofori-Asenso
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Agyeman AA, Bergen PJ, Rao GG, Nation RL, Landersdorfer CB. Mortality, clinical and microbiological response following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections (a meta-analysis dataset). Data Brief 2020; 28:104907. [PMID: 31886351 PMCID: PMC6921139 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
This meta-analysis was conducted to assess mortality, clinical and microbiological response following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. Fifty-four observational studies involving 3195 CRKP-infected patients who received antibiotic treatment were included. We found combination therapy to be associated with lower mortality than monotherapy, but no differences in clinical and microbiological response. Among the various combination therapies, no significant differences in mortality, clinical and microbiological response were found. Moreover, clinical outcomes did not differ significantly among various monotherapies. This report describes the data related to the article entitled: "A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akosua A. Agyeman
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville Campus), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Phillip J. Bergen
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville Campus), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gauri G. Rao
- UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Roger L. Nation
- Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville Campus), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cornelia B. Landersdorfer
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville Campus), Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Agyeman AA, Bergen PJ, Rao GG, Nation RL, Landersdorfer CB. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2019; 55:105833. [PMID: 31730892 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are a major global public health challenge. This study aimed to systematically review the evidence on treatment outcomes (mortality, clinical and microbiological response) following antibiotic therapy administered for CRKP infections. METHODS Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases were searched from inception to 26 December 2018. Data were analysed via meta-analysis techniques using random-effects (DerSimonian and Laird) modelling. RESULTS Fifty-four observational studies involving 3195 CRKP-infected patients who received antibiotic treatment were included. The pooled mortality, clinical and microbiological response rates were 37.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 33.1-41.4%), 69.0% (95% CI 60.1-78.2%) and 63.7% (95% CI 53.7-74.1%), respectively. Compared with combination therapy, monotherapy was associated with a higher likelihood of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.45, 95% CI 1.18-1.78%), but there were no statistically significant differences in the likelihood of achieving clinical and microbiological responses. There were no statistically significant differences in the pooled likelihood of mortality, clinical or microbiological responses between two-drug and three-or-more-drug combination therapies or combination-containing and combination-sparing regimens of polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides and carbapenems. Moreover, clinical outcomes did not significantly differ among the various monotherapies. CONCLUSIONS These data highlight the need for systematic studies and well-designed randomised clinical trials to identify and evaluate the most appropriate antibiotic therapies for CRKP infections towards informing clinical decision-making. Furthermore, continuous surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns at local, regional, and national/international levels are important to support empirically-based therapy until susceptibility results for the isolate from the patient are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akosua A Agyeman
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville campus), Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Phillip J Bergen
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville campus), Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gauri G Rao
- UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Roger L Nation
- Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville campus), Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cornelia B Landersdorfer
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University (Parkville campus), Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Parathion, like most organophosphorus insecticides currently in use, must undergo cytochrome P450(P450)-dependent activation in order to exert its acute mammalian toxicity (cholinergic crisis). Since P450 isoforms play such an important role in mediating the toxicity of parathion and related insecticides, factors which significantly alter P450 activities, such as exposure to certain xenobiotics, can also be expected to affect the toxicity of these potentially hazardous insecticides. Cimetidine is a H2-histamine antagonist that has been shown to inhibit several P450-isoforms. In addition, administration of cimetidine has been reported to result in clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with a wide variety of drugs. In the present study coexposure to cimetidine and parathion resulted in a moderate increase in the toxicity of this pesticide. However, coexposure to cimetidine and paraoxon did not alter the toxicity of the organophosphate, indicating that cimetidine likely affected P450-dependent formation of paraoxon from parathion. In vitro incubations of mouse hepatic microsomes demonstrated that, in addition to reducing the velocity of P450-dependent metabolism of parathion, cimetidine increased the proportion of paraoxon formed (activation). and decreased the proportion of p-nitrophenol formed (detoxification). Since parathion is not eliminated significantly by other routes in the mouse, the bulk of parathion in vivo was metabolized by P450 (although more slowly) in the presence of cimetidine, leading to a greater amount of paraoxon produced, and therefore greater toxicity. Incubations with individual P450 isoforms suggested that cimetidine could act by inhibition of P450 isoforms that detoxify parathion to a greater degree than cimetidine-resistant isoforms, and/or cimetidine could alter the proportions of detoxification versus activation of certain individual isoforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Agyeman
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark 07103, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|