LRG1: an emerging player in disease pathogenesis

The secreted glycoprotein leucine-rich α-2 glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) was first described as a key player in pathogenic ocular neovascularization almost a decade ago. Since then, an increasing number of publications have reported the involvement of LRG1 in multiple human conditions including cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, neurological disease, and inflammatory disorders. The purpose of this review is to provide, for the first time, a comprehensive overview of the LRG1 literature considering its role in health and disease. Although LRG1 is constitutively expressed by hepatocytes and neutrophils, Lrg1-/- mice show no overt phenotypic abnormality suggesting that LRG1 is essentially redundant in development and homeostasis. However, emerging data are challenging this view by suggesting a novel role for LRG1 in innate immunity and preservation of tissue integrity. While our understanding of beneficial LRG1 functions in physiology remains limited, a consistent body of evidence shows that, in response to various inflammatory stimuli, LRG1 expression is induced and directly contributes to disease pathogenesis. Its potential role as a biomarker for the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of multiple conditions is widely discussed while dissecting the mechanisms underlying LRG1 pathogenic functions. Emphasis is given to the role that LRG1 plays as a vasculopathic factor where it disrupts the cellular interactions normally required for the formation and maintenance of mature vessels, thereby indirectly contributing to the establishment of a highly hypoxic and immunosuppressive microenvironment. In addition, LRG1 has also been reported to affect other cell types (including epithelial, immune, mesenchymal and cancer cells) mostly by modulating the TGFβ signalling pathway in a context-dependent manner. Crucially, animal studies have shown that LRG1 inhibition, through gene deletion or a function-blocking antibody, is sufficient to attenuate disease progression. In view of this, and taking into consideration its role as an upstream modifier of TGFβ signalling, LRG1 is suggested as a potentially important therapeutic target. While further investigations are needed to fill gaps in our current understanding of LRG1 function, the studies reviewed here confirm LRG1 as a pleiotropic and pathogenic signalling molecule providing a strong rationale for its use in the clinic as a biomarker and therapeutic target.

Factors affecting laser power in retinal Navilas laser treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of patient-associated factors on the minimum laser power needed for a mild visible burn in focal laser treatments using the 532 nm Navilas laser system.

METHODS

We conducted a monocentric prospective pilot study of 58 eyes of 40 patients with diabetic macular edema. The following parameters were analysed: axial length, refraction, iris pigmentation, lens status, lens grading and densitometry, retinal and choroidal thickness and focus setting during treatment. Laser power was adjusted to produce mild, barely visible burns. Retinal laser burn size was measured 30 min after treatment.

RESULTS

Focus setting is significantly correlated with retinal lesion size (r = 0.50, p = 0.001) and laser power (r = 0.44, p < 0.001). Axial length only correlated with laser power when the effect of focus was controlled. Phakic eyes needed more laser power than pseudophakic eyes (78.3 versus 67.2 mW, p = 0.051). No correlation of laser power with any other factor could be found.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the examined parameters, focus setting had the strongest effect on the laser power needed to produce a mild visible burn. The association of focus with laser power can be explained by the focus-dependent change of retinal spot size. Lens status (phakic versus pseudophakic patients) seems to influence laser light transmission in the examined age group.

Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of intraretinal or subretinal fluid accumulation secondary to chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

METHODS

Twelve patients were treated with intravitreal injections of 2.5 mg bevacizumab at 6- to 8-week intervals until intraretinal or subretinal fluid resolved. Observation procedures were Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmic examination, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), performed at 6- to 8-week intervals. Fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline visit and thereafter depending on clinical and OCT findings. Multivariate analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to calculate a statistical significance of change in BCVA and mean central retinal thickness, which were the main outcome measures. SAS statistical software was used for analyses.

RESULTS

Patients received 2-/+1 intravitreal injections of bevacizumab on average during a follow-up of 24-/+14 weeks. Mean BCVA increased by 2-/+2 lines; the change in BCVA (logMAR) was significant (p<0.02). Mean central retinal thickness decreased significantly over follow-up (p<0.05), with 6 patients (50%) showing complete resolution of subretinal fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic and functional improvement following intravitreal bevacizumab injections suggest that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may be involved in fluid leakage in patients with chronic CSC. The results suggest a possible role for anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of chronic CSC. Further evaluation of intravitreal bevacizumab for chronic CSC in controlled randomized studies is warranted.

Long-term follow-up of OCT-guided bevacizumab treatment of macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the long-term outcome of an OCT-guided reinjection scheme for bevacizumab treatment of macular edema (ME) due to retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Patients with persistent ME (>250 microm) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) received intravitreal bevacizumab 2.5 mg/0.1 ml. Visual acuity (ETDRS), ophthalmic examination and OCT were performed at baseline and at 6- to 8-week intervals. Reinjections were only performed if OCT showed persistent or recurrent ME.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with a minimum follow-up of 25 weeks were included in this analysis. Mean follow-up was 60 +/- 29 wks. In CRVO patients, central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased from 748 +/- 265 microm to 372 +/- 224 microm (p < 0.001) and visual acuity (VA) improved by 1.9 +/- 3.2 lines. In BRVO patients, mean CRT decreased from 601 +/- 206 microm to 386 +/- 178 microm (p < 0.001) and VA improved by 1.8 +/- 2.6 lines. Thirty-three percent of CRVO and 15% of BRVO patients did not show a ME recurrence for > or =25 wks at last visit. Thirty-seven percent of CRVO and 50% of BRVO patients suffered recurrences of ME within the last 25 wks, whereas 30% of CRVO and 35% of BRVO patients did not achieve a complete resolution of ME at any follow-up visit after receiving a minimum of three injections. CRVO patients with dry interval of > or =25 weeks at last visit were significantly younger, had a thinner CRT at baseline and more often had a complete resolution of ME after the first injection. In CRVO and BRVO, final VA was correlated significantly with initial VA, patients' age and final CRT. Change of VA was correlated with change of CRT in BRVO.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with retinal vein occlusion benefit from treatment with bevacizumab. Favourable long-term results without necessity of further injections were achieved in 33% and 15% of CRVO and BRVO patients respectively. The remaining patients needed repeated injections to treat ME recurrences. However, one third of the CRVO/BRVO patients did not improve in VA, and further injections might be discontinued in these patients.