1
|
Twardek WM, Nyboer EA, Tickner D, O'Connor CM, Lapointe NWR, Taylor MK, Gregory‐Eaves I, Smol JP, Reid AJ, Creed IF, Nguyen VM, Winegardner AK, Bergman JN, Taylor JJ, Rytwinski T, Martel AL, Drake DAR, Robinson SA, Marty J, Bennett JR, Cooke SJ. Mobilizing practitioners to support the Emergency Recovery Plan for freshwater biodiversity. Conservat Sci and Prac 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- William M. Twardek
- Canadian Centre for Evidence‐Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Elizabeth A. Nyboer
- Canadian Centre for Evidence‐Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - John P. Smol
- Paleoecological Environmental Assessment and Research Lab, Department of Biology Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada
| | - Andrea J. Reid
- Indigenous Fisheries Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries The University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Irena F. Creed
- School of Environment and Sustainability University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada
| | - Vivian M. Nguyen
- Canadian Centre for Evidence‐Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | | | - Jordanna N. Bergman
- Canadian Centre for Evidence‐Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Jessica J. Taylor
- Canadian Centre for Evidence‐Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Trina Rytwinski
- Canadian Centre for Evidence‐Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | | | - D. Andrew R. Drake
- Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Fisheries and Oceans Canada Burlington Ontario Canada
| | - Stacey A. Robinson
- Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division Wildlife and Landscape Science Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Jerome Marty
- Council of Canadian Academies Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Joseph R. Bennett
- Canadian Centre for Evidence‐Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Steven J. Cooke
- Canadian Centre for Evidence‐Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doubek JP, Carey CC, Lavender M, Winegardner AK, Beaulieu M, Kelly PT, Pollard AI, Straile D, Stockwell JD. Calanoid copepod zooplankton density is positively associated with water residence time across the continental United States. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0209567. [PMID: 30625172 PMCID: PMC6326432 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Inherent differences between naturally-formed lakes and human-made reservoirs may play an important role in shaping zooplankton community structure. For example, because many reservoirs are created by impounding and managing lotic systems for specific human purposes, zooplankton communities may be affected by factors that are unique to reservoirs, such as shorter water residence times and a reservoir’s management regime, compared to natural lakes. However, the environmental factors that structure zooplankton communities in natural lakes vs. reservoirs may vary at the continental scale and remain largely unknown. We analyzed data from the 2007 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s National Lakes Assessment and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ National Inventory of Dams to compare large-bodied crustacean zooplankton communities (defined here as individuals retained by 0.243 mm mesh size) in natural lakes and reservoirs across the continental U.S. using multiple linear regressions and regression tree analyses. We found that large-bodied crustacean zooplankton density was overall higher in natural lakes compared to reservoirs when the effect of latitude was controlled. The difference between waterbody types was driven by calanoid copepods, which were also more likely to be dominant in the >0.243 mm zooplankton community in natural lakes than in reservoirs. Regression tree analyses revealed that water residence time was not a major driver of calanoid copepod density in natural lakes but was one of the most important drivers of calanoid copepod density in reservoirs, which had on average 0.5-year shorter water residence times than natural lakes. Reservoirs managed for purposes that resulted in shorter residence times (e.g., hydroelectric power) had lower zooplankton densities than reservoirs managed for purposes that resulted in longer residence times (e.g., irrigation). Consequently, our results indicate that water residence time may be an important characteristic driving differing large-bodied zooplankton dynamics between reservoirs and natural lakes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P. Doubek
- Virginia Tech, Department of Biological Sciences, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Cayelan C. Carey
- Virginia Tech, Department of Biological Sciences, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Michael Lavender
- Queen’s University, Biology Department, Biosciences Complex, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Marieke Beaulieu
- Université de Sherbrooke, Département de Génie Civil, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Patrick T. Kelly
- Biology Department, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Amina I. Pollard
- Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Dietmar Straile
- Limnological Institute, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Jason D. Stockwell
- University of Vermont, Rubenstein Ecosystem Science Laboratory, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laforest BJ, Winegardner AK, Zaheer OA, Jeffery NW, Boyle EE, Adamowicz SJ. Insights into biodiversity sampling strategies for freshwater microinvertebrate faunas through bioblitz campaigns and DNA barcoding. BMC Ecol 2013; 13:13. [PMID: 23557180 PMCID: PMC3651337 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-13-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2012] [Accepted: 03/14/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biodiversity surveys have long depended on traditional methods of taxonomy to inform sampling protocols and to determine when a representative sample of a given species pool of interest has been obtained. Questions remain as to how to design appropriate sampling efforts to accurately estimate total biodiversity. Here we consider the biodiversity of freshwater ostracods (crustacean class Ostracoda) from the region of Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. Through an analysis of observed species richness and complementarity, accumulation curves, and richness estimators, we conduct an a posteriori analysis of five bioblitz-style collection strategies that differed in terms of total duration, number of sites, protocol flexibility to heterogeneous habitats, sorting of specimens for analysis, and primary purpose of collection. We used DNA barcoding to group specimens into molecular operational taxonomic units for comparison. RESULTS Forty-eight provisional species were identified through genetic divergences, up from the 30 species previously known and documented in literature from the Churchill region. We found differential sampling efficiency among the five strategies, with liberal sorting of specimens for molecular analysis, protocol flexibility (and particularly a focus on covering diverse microhabitats), and a taxon-specific focus to collection having strong influences on garnering more accurate species richness estimates. CONCLUSIONS Our findings have implications for the successful design of future biodiversity surveys and citizen-science collection projects, which are becoming increasingly popular and have been shown to produce reliable results for a variety of taxa despite relying on largely untrained collectors. We propose that efficiency of biodiversity surveys can be increased by non-experts deliberately selecting diverse microhabitats; by conducting two rounds of molecular analysis, with the numbers of samples processed during round two informed by the singleton prevalence during round one; and by having sub-teams (even if all non-experts) focus on select taxa. Our study also provides new insights into subarctic diversity of freshwater Ostracoda and contributes to the broader "Barcoding Biotas" campaign at Churchill. Finally, we comment on the associated implications and future research directions for community ecology analyses and biodiversity surveys through DNA barcoding, which we show here to be an efficient technique enabling rapid biodiversity quantification in understudied taxa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon J Laforest
- Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada
| | - Amanda K Winegardner
- Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Docteur Penfield, Montréal, QC, H2X 2K6, Canada
| | - Omar A Zaheer
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Nicholas W Jeffery
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Elizabeth E Boyle
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Sarah J Adamowicz
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
- Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|