Upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Stratified analysis from three randomized phase 3 trials by key baseline characteristics

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous inflammatory skin disease with different clinical phenotypes based on factors such as age, race, comorbidities, and clinical signs and symptoms. The effect of these factors on therapeutic responses in AD has only been scarcely studied and not for upadacitinib. Currently, there is no biomarker predicting response to upadacitinib.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the efficacy of the oral Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib across patient subgroups (baseline demographics, disease characteristics and prior treatment) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Data from phase 3 studies (Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2 and AD Up) were utilized for this post hoc analysis. Adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized to receive once daily oral upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg or placebo; patients enrolled in the AD Up study received concomitant topical corticosteroids. Data from the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 studies were integrated.

RESULTS

A total of 2584 patients were randomized. A consistently greater proportion of patients achieved at least 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, a 0 or 1 on the validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis, and improvement in itch (including an achievement of a reduction of ≥4; and score of 0/1 in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale) with upadacitinib compared with placebo at Week 16, regardless of age, sex, race, body mass index, AD severity, body surface area involvement, history of atopic comorbidities or asthma, or previous exposure to systemic therapy or cyclosporin.

CONCLUSIONS

Upadacitinib had consistently high skin clearance rates and itch efficacy across subgroups of patients with moderate-to-severe AD through Week 16. These results support upadacitinib as a suitable treatment option in a variety of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03569293 (Measure Up 1), NCT03607422 (Measure Up 2) and NCT03568318 (AD Up).

Prevalence and burden of atopic dermatitis involving the head, neck, face, and hand: A cross sectional study from the TARGET-DERM AD cohort

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is severely burdensome, and there has been poor characterization of any differences in impact based on the area affected.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence and HRQoL impact of head/face/neck/hand (HFNH) involvement among patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

All TARGET-DERM AD registry patients with moderate/severe Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA-AD) were assessed using the Patient Oriented SCORing Atopic Dermatitis, Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and the (Children's) Dermatology Life Quality Index ((C)DLQI).

RESULTS

541 participants met the criteria (75.0% adults) and 84% (N = 453) reported HFNH involvement. HFNH and non-HFNH involved participants had similar characteristics; 55.2% female and 46.9% White. Compared to the non-HFNH involved, the involved had severe vIGA-AD (28.5% vs 16.3%, P = .02) and higher median body surface area affected (15% vs 10%, P ≤ .01) and were twice as likely to have higher (C)DLQI and POEM scores.

LIMITATIONS

This was an analysis of real-world and patient reported outcome data.

CONCLUSION

Real-world HFNH involved AD patients were associated with significantly worse quality of life, POEM/(C)DLQI, and more severe disease. Detailed assessments of specific areas affected by AD are needed to personalize treatment.

Do Atopic Dermatitis Patient-Reported Outcomes Correlate With Validated Investigator Global Assessment? Insights From TARGET-AD Registry

BACKGROUND

Research examining associations between the clinician-reported validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) and patient-reported disease burden is sparse. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between vIGA-AD with patient-reported disease severity and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using a September 2021 data cut from the TARGET-DERM AD study, a real-world, longitudinal cohort of children, adolescents, and adults with AD enrolled at 44 academic and community dermatology and allergy sites in the US. Clinical AD severity was measured using vIGA-AD while disease severity and QoL were assessed by the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and (Children’s) Dermatology Life Quality Index (C/DLQI), respectively. Patient characteristics, clinical- and patient reported-outcomes were assessed by stratified POEM and C/DLQI categories using descriptive statistics. Associations with vIGA-AD were evaluated using unadjusted and adjusted ordinal logistic regression and linear regression models.

RESULTS

The analysis cohort (n=1,888) primarily consisted of adults (57%), females (56%), and patients with private insurance (63%). Unadjusted analyses suggest that clinical AD severity was associated with age, with more adolescents and adults having moderate/severe vIGA-AD than pediatric patients. Clinical AD severity was also associated with disease severity, with greater POEM scores observed at greater vIGA-AD severity levels (r = 0.496 and 0.45 for adults and pediatrics, respectively). Clinical AD severity and QoL were positively correlated, with greater CDLQI/DLQI scores at greater vIGA-AD severity levels (r = 0.458 and 0.334 for DLQI and CDLQI, respectively). After adjusting for demographics and other risk factors, vIGA-AD continued to show significant associations with POEM and DLQI/CDLQI. Compared to patients with clear/almost clear disease, adults and pediatrics with moderate-to-severe AD were 8.19 and 5.78 times as likely to be in a more severe POEM category, respectively. Similarly, compared to patients with clear/almost clear disease, adults and pediatrics with moderate/severe AD were 6.69 and 3.74 times as likely to be in a more severe DLQI/CDLQI category. Adjusted linear regression analyses of DLQI in adults showed significant differences by vIGA-AD level, with mild AD and moderate/severe AD associated with a 2.26-point and 5.42-point greater DLQI relative to clear/almost clear AD.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study of patients with AD, greater clinician-reported disease severity is positively correlated with higher patient-reported disease severity and lower QoL. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4): doi:10.36849/JDD.7473 Access Supplementary Material here Citation: Guttman-Yassky E, Bar J, Rothenberg Lausell C, et al. Do atopic dermatitis patient-reported outcomes correlate with validated investigator global assessment? Insights from TARGET-AD registry. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4):344-355. doi:10.36849/JDD.7473.

357 The effect of upadacitinib on the genital region in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: an analysis from the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 studies

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease that can be debilitating, impacting all body areas, including the genital region. Genital AD results in impairments in daily activity levels, sexual function and sleep, contributing to impaired quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with greater inhibitory potency for JAK1 vs. JAK2, JAK3 and tyrosine kinase 2, indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe AD. The SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) measure assesses the extent and severity to which a body area is affected, as well as itch and sleeplessness due to AD. In this post-hoc analysis of the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 studies, we evaluated the proportion of patients whose genital AD resolved with UPA 15 mg or UPA 30 mg compared with placebo. Measure Up 1 and 2 are phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies comparing the safety and efficacy of UPA 15 mg and UPA 30 mg to placebo in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients were randomized to oral once daily UPA 15 mg, UPA 30 mg or placebo. The current study assessed the proportion of patients with genital involvement at baseline who achieved genital AD resolution at week 2 and week 16 based on data collected from the SCORAD. Non-responder imputation was used. Of the 1679 participants, 239 (14.2%) had genital AD at baseline and were randomized to UPA 15 mg (n = 77), UPA 30 mg (n = 86) or placebo (n = 76). More participants with genital involvement vs. those without were male (61.1% vs. 54.1%), ≥18 years old (92.1% vs. 85.5%), and severe according to the Validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for Atopic Dermatitis (66.9% vs. 47.2%) at baseline. On average, participants with genital involvement at baseline also reported greater disease duration (25.0 vs. 22.8 years) and higher Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores (19.2 vs. 16.3). At week 2, the proportion of patients whose genital AD was resolved was 70.1% of the UPA 15 mg group, and 82.6% of the UPA 30 mg group, both of which were greater than the placebo group (31.6%; P < 0.001). At week 16, the proportion of patients whose genital AD was resolved increased in the UPA 15 mg (80.5%) and UPA 30 mg (83.7%) groups, but not in the placebo group (28.9%) which remained lower than both groups (P < 0.001). More patients with moderate-to-severe AD achieved resolution of their genital AD with UPA 15 mg or 30 mg monotherapy daily compared to placebo, with >70% rapidly achieving genital AD resolution after 2 weeks and >80% after 16 weeks of UPA treatment. In addition to overall improvements in moderate-to-severe AD with UPA, resolution of genital AD may correspond to improvements in sexual functioning, reductions in sleeplessness and greater quality of life. These findings underscore the importance of considering genital involvement when assessing the burden of AD to comprehensively inform integrated shared decision-making treatment discussions between patients and physicians.

Upadacitinib plus topical corticosteroids in atopic dermatitis: week-52 AD Up study results

BACKGROUND

Primary (week 16) results from the ongoing phase 3, double-blind AD Up study (NCT03568318) demonstrate a positive benefit-risk profile for upadacitinib+TCS in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate efficacy and safety of UPA+TCS through 52 weeks.

METHODS

Patients (12-75y) with chronic AD (≥10% of body surface area affected, EASI ≥16, vIGA-AD™ ≥3, and WP-NRS score ≥4) were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily upadacitinib 15mg+TCS, upadacitinib 30mg+TCS, or PBO+TCS (re-randomized at week 16 to upadacitinib+TCS). Safety and efficacy, including proportion of patients achieving ≥75% improvement in EASI (EASI-75), vIGA-AD of clear/almost clear with improvement ≥2 grades (vIGA-AD 0/1), and WP-NRS improvement ≥4, were assessed through week 52. Missing data were primarily handled by nonresponder imputation incorporating multiple imputation for missing values due to COVID-19.

RESULTS

Of 901 patients, 300 were randomized to upadacitinib 15mg+TCS, 297 to upadacitinib 30mg+TCS, and 304 to PBO+TCS. For all endpoints, efficacy for upadacitinib 15mg+TCS and upadacitinib 30mg+TCS at week 16 was maintained through week 52. At week 52, the proportions of patients treated with upadacitinib 15mg+TCS and upadacitinib 30mg+TCS who achieved EASI-75 were 50.8% and 69.0%, respectively; 33.5% and 45.2%, respectively, achieved vIGA-AD 0/1; and 45.3% and 57.5%, respectively, achieved WP-NRS improvement ≥4. upadacitinib+TCS was well tolerated through 52 weeks; no new important safety risks beyond the current label were observed. No deaths were reported; events of MACE and VTE were infrequent (≤0.2/100 PY).

CONCLUSION

Results through 52 weeks demonstrate long-term maintenance of efficacy and a favorable safety profile of upadacitinib+TCS in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.