Short- and long-term outcomes of patients with hyper or hypothyroidism following COVID vaccine

Since the beginning of the wide-scale anti-Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination program, sporadic cases of thyroid disease following vaccination have been reported. We describe 19 consecutive cases of COVID vaccine-related thyroid disease. Medical records were reviewed for 9 patients with Graves' disease (GD) and 10 with Thyroiditis, all of whom were diagnosed following COVID-19 vaccination. In the GD group, the median age was 45.5 years, female/male(F/M) ratio 5:4, thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins were elevated in seven patients. The median time from vaccination to diagnosis was 3 months. Methimazole treatment was given to all but one patient. At a median follow-up of 8.5 months from vaccination, three patients were still on methimazole, five went into remission (data were missing for one). In the Thyroiditis group, the median age was 47 years, the F/M ratio 7:3. Thyroiditis was diagnosed after the first, second, and third doses in one, two, and seven patients, respectively. The median time from vaccination to diagnosis was 2 months. TPO antibodies were positive in three patients. All patients were euthyroid off medication at the last visit. Six patients were diagnosed in the hypothyroid phase at 2.5 months from vaccination. Four resolved spontaneously at 3, 6, 4, and 8 months; the other two were treated with thyroxine at 1.5 and 2 months from vaccination and remained on treatment at their last visit, at 11.5 and 8.5 months, respectively. Thyroid disease should be included among possible complications of COVID-19 vaccine and either a late onset or delayed diagnosis should be considered.

Establishing priorities for diabetes action goals according to key opinion leaders and health professionals

Background

The ever-increasing burden of diabetes and the limited resources highlight the need for prioritization of national action goals for diabetes management. The Israeli National Diabetes Council (INDC) initiated a prioritization process aiming to set a top list of diabetes related goals, as suggested by decision makers and health professionals.

Methods

A 2-step prioritization process, including a small (n = 32) circle of key opinion leaders of the INDC and a larger (n = 195) nationwide circle of diabetes health professionals consisting of physicians, nurses, and dieticians working in diabetes care centers, hospitals and family practice clinics, was established. An online questionnaire presenting 45 different action areas in diabetes prevention and care was distributed to the INDC members who ranked the 3 top diabetes priorities based on their individual interpretation of importance and applicability. The 7 highest ranking priorities were later presented to hospital-based and community diabetes health professionals. These professionals selected the 3 top priorities, based on their perceived importance.

Results

Council members opted mostly for action areas regarding specific populations, such as clinics for adult type-1 diabetes patients, diabetic foot, and pediatric and adolescent patients, while the health professionals’ top priorities were mostly in the general field of prevention, namely high-risk prediabetes population, prevention of obesity, and promotion of healthy life-style. In addition, priorities differed between hospital and community health professionals as well as between different professional groups.

Conclusions

A national prioritization process of action areas in diabetes prevention and care is attainable. The resulting item list is affected by professional considerations. These priorities may direct efforts in the implementation of interventions to improve national-level diabetes management.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13584-022-00540-x.

Prior ischemic strokes are non-inferior for predicting future ischemic strokes than CHA2DS2-VASc score in hemodialysis patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Background

We tested whether CHA₂DS₂-VASc and/or HAS-BLED scores better predict ischemic stroke and major bleeding, respectively, than their individual components in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of a clinical database containing the medical records of 268 MHD patients with non-valvular AF (167 women, mean age 73.4 ± 10.2 years). During the median follow-up of 21.0 (interquartile range, 5.0–44.0) months, 46 (17.2%) ischemic strokes and 24 (9.0%) major bleeding events were reported.

Results

Although CHA₂DS₂-VASc predicted ischemic stroke risk in the study population (adjusted HR 1.74 with 95% CI 1.23–2.46 for each unit of increase in CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, and HR of 5.57 with 95% CI 1.88–16.49 for CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥ 6), prior ischemic strokes/transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) were non-inferior in both univariate and multivariate analyses (adjusted HR 8.65 with 95% CI 2.82–26.49). The ROC AUC was larger for the prior ischemic stroke/TIA than for CHA₂DS₂-VASc. Furthermore, the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score did not predict future ischemic stroke risks in study participants who did not previously experience ischemic strokes/TIAs (adjusted HR 1.41, 95% CI: 0.84–2.36). The HAS-BLED score and its components did not have predictive abilities in discriminating bleeding risk in the study population.

Conclusions

Previous ischemic strokes are non-inferior for predicting of future ischemic strokes than the complete CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in MHD patients. CHA₂DS₂VASc scores are less predictive in MHD patients without histories of CVA/TIA. HAS-BLED scores do not predict major bleeding in MHD patients. These findings should redesign approaches to ischemic stroke risk stratification in MHD patients if future large-scale epidemiological studies confirm them.

A Rare Case of Spinal Sarcoidosis Presenting as Multiple Bone Marrow Oedematous Lesions

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disorder that most commonly affects the lungs. Bone involvement is rare, and spinal involvement is even more rare. The presence of focal lesions of the vertebrae is highly suspicious of advanced malignancy. However, malignant metastatic spread to the spine involves the vertebral cortex rather than the bone marrow itself, a distinction that is often missed and therefore misleading. We describe here a middle-aged woman with multiple focal oedematous lesions of the bone marrow suspected of being advanced malignancy but finally diagnosed as a rare case of spinal sarcoidosis.