1
|
Mueller TC, Kehl V, Dimpel R, Blankenstein C, Egert-Schwender S, Strudthoff J, Lock JF, Wiegering A, Hadian A, Lang H, Albertsmeier M, Neuberger M, Von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt V, Mihaljevic AL, Knebel P, Pianka F, Braumann C, Uhl W, Bouchard R, Petrova E, Bork U, Distler M, Tachezy M, Izbicki JR, Reissfelder C, Herrle F, Vay C, Knoefel WT, Buia A, Hanisch E, Friess H, Reim D. Intraoperative Wound Irrigation for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Laparotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial by CHIR-Net. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:484-492. [PMID: 38381428 PMCID: PMC10882507 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Importance Surgical site infections frequently occur after open abdominal surgery. Intraoperative wound irrigation as a preventive measure is a common practice worldwide, although evidence supporting this practice is lacking. Objective To evaluate the preventive effect of intraoperative wound irrigation with polyhexanide solution. Design, Setting, and Participants The Intraoperative Wound Irrigation to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Laparotomy (IOWISI) trial was a multicenter, 3-armed, randomized clinical trial. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention. The clinical trial was conducted in 12 university and general hospitals in Germany from September 2017 to December 2021 with 30-day follow-up. Adult patients undergoing laparotomy were eligible for inclusion. The main exclusion criteria were clean laparoscopic procedures and the inability to provide consent. Of 11 700 screened, 689 were included and 557 completed the trial; 689 were included in the intention-to-treat and safety analysis. Interventions Randomization was performed online (3:3:1 allocation) to polyhexanide 0.04%, saline, or no irrigation (control) of the operative wound before closure. Main Outcome and Measures The primary end point was surgical site infection within 30 postoperative days according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition. Results Among the 689 patients included, 402 were male and 287 were female. The median (range) age was 65.9 (18.5-94.9) years. Participants were randomized to either wound irrigation with polyhexanide (n = 292), saline (n = 295), or no irrigation (n = 102). The procedures were classified as clean contaminated in 92 cases (8%). The surgical site infection incidence was 11.8% overall (81 of 689), 10.6% in the polyhexanide arm (31 of 292), 12.5% in the saline arm (37 of 295), and 12.8% in the no irrigation arm (13 of 102). Irrigation with polyhexanide was not statistically superior to no irrigation or saline irrigation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% CI, 0.64-2.36 vs HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.74-1.94; P = .47). The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ among the 3 groups. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, intraoperative wound irrigation with polyhexanide solution did not reduce surgical site infection incidence in clean-contaminated open abdominal surgical procedures compared to saline or no irrigation. More clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the potential benefit in contaminated and septic procedures, including the emergency setting. Trial Registration drks.de Identifier: DRKS00012251.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Catharina Mueller
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Victoria Kehl
- Münchner Studienzentrum, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rebekka Dimpel
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christiane Blankenstein
- Münchner Studienzentrum, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Silvia Egert-Schwender
- Münchner Studienzentrum, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Judith Strudthoff
- Münchner Studienzentrum, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johan Friso Lock
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Armin Wiegering
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ali Hadian
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Albertsmeier
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Neuberger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktor Von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - André L. Mihaljevic
- Clinical Study Center, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Phillip Knebel
- Clinical Study Center, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frank Pianka
- Clinical Study Center, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Chris Braumann
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum Hospitals, Bochum, Germany
| | - Waldemar Uhl
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum Hospitals, Bochum, Germany
| | - Ralf Bouchard
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ekaterina Petrova
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bork
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Helmholtz Center Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marius Distler
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Helmholtz Center Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Tachezy
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jakob R. Izbicki
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Florian Herrle
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christian Vay
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, and Pediatric Surgery, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wolfram Trudo Knoefel
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, and Pediatric Surgery, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Alexander Buia
- Asklepios Clinic Langen, Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Langen, Germany
| | - Ernst Hanisch
- Asklepios Clinic Langen, Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Langen, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Reim
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klotz R, Mihaljevic AL, Kulu Y, Sander A, Klose C, Behnisch R, Joos MC, Kalkum E, Nickel F, Knebel P, Pianka F, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy (EUROPA): a randomised controlled stage 2b trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2024; 39:100864. [PMID: 38420108 PMCID: PMC10899052 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Background Open partial pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) represents the current gold standard of surgical treatment of a wide range of diseases of the pancreatic head but is associated with morbidity in around 40% of cases. Robotic partial pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is being used increasingly, yet, no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of RPD versus OPD have been published, leaving a low level of evidence to support this practice. Methods This investigator-initiated, exploratory RCT with two parallel study arms was conducted at a high-volume pancreatic centre in line with IDEAL recommendations (stage 2b). Patients scheduled for elective partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for any indication were randomised (1:1) to RPD or OPD with a centralised web-based tool. The primary endpoint was postoperative cumulative morbidity within 90 days, assessed via the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Biometricians were blinded to the intervention, but patients and surgeons were not. The trial was registered prospectively (DRKS00020407). Findings Between June 3, 2020 and February 14, 2022, 81 patients were randomly assigned to RPD (n = 41) or OPD (n = 40), of whom 62 patients (RPD: n = 29, OPD: n = 33) were analysed in the modified intention to treat analysis. Four patients in the OPD group were randomised, but did not undergo surgery in our department and one patient was excluded in the RPD group due to other reason. Nine patients in the RPD group and 3 patients in the OPD were excluded from the primary analysis because they did not undergo PD, but rather underwent other types of surgery. The CCI after 90 days was comparable between groups (RPD: 34.02 ± 23.48 versus OPD: 36.45 ± 27.65, difference in means [95% CI]: -2.42 [-15.55; 10.71], p = 0.713). The RPD group had a higher incidence of grade B/C pancreas-specific complications compared to the OPD group (17 (58.6%) versus 11 (33.3%); difference in rates [95% CI]: 25.3% [1.2%; 49.4%], p = 0.046). The only complication that occurred significantly more often in the RPD than in the OPD group was clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying. Procedure-related and overall hospital costs were significantly higher and duration of surgery was longer in the RPD group. Blood loss did not differ significantly between groups. The intraoperative conversion rate of RPD was 23%. Overall 90-day mortality was 4.8% without significant differences between RPD and OPD. Interpretation In the setting of a very high-volume centre, both RPD and OPD can be considered safe techniques. Further confirmatory multicentre RCTs are warranted to uncover potential advantages of RPD in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes. Funding Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF: 01KG2010).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Klotz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Yakup Kulu
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Sander
- Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Klose
- Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rouven Behnisch
- Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian C Joos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Kalkum
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Phillip Knebel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frank Pianka
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zimmermann V, Frauenfeld L, Löffler MW, Mihaljevic AL, Yurttas C. Long-term recurrence-free survival following pancreatic surgery with HIPEC treatment for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. BMJ Case Rep 2024; 17:e258626. [PMID: 38373815 PMCID: PMC10882348 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-258626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
More than 5 years previous to this report, a female patient in her 60s underwent oncological left-sided pancreatic resection and adrenalectomy including splenectomy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), recommended by a multidisciplinary tumour board (MDT). Additionally, she was treated with gemcitabine-containing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for 60 minutes in the framework of a clinical trial (PanHIPEC), aiming to determine the safety and feasibility (not efficacy) of this approach. Following the postoperative MDT recommendation, she subsequently received adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of six cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin for a histopathologically confirmed PDAC of the pancreatic tail with infiltration of the left-sided adrenal gland (pT3, pN1 (3/16), cM0, L0, V0, Pn1, R0, G2). Five years and five months after pancreatic surgery and HIPEC, the patient has no signs of tumour recurrence as determined by follow-up examination including CT scan and CA19-9 tumour marker serology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Zimmermann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Leonie Frauenfeld
- Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Markus W Löffler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC2180) "Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Can Yurttas
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yurttas C, Beil J, Berchtold S, Smirnow I, Kloker LD, Sipos B, Löffler MW, Königsrainer A, Mihaljevic AL, Lauer UM, Thiel K. Efficacy of Different Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Strains for the Treatment of Murine Peritoneal Mesothelioma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:368. [PMID: 38254857 PMCID: PMC10814383 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Effective treatment options for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are scarce. Oncolytic virotherapy with recombinant vaccinia viruses might constitute a novel treatment option for PSM. We aimed to identify the most effective oncolytic vaccinia virus strain in two murine mesothelioma cell lines and the oncolytic potential in a murine model of peritoneal mesothelioma. Cell lines AB12 and AC29 were infected in vitro with vaccinia virus strains Lister (GLV-1h254), Western Reserve (GLV-0b347), and Copenhagen (GLV-4h463). The virus strain GLV-0b347 was shown most effective in vitro and was further investigated by intraperitoneal (i.p.) application to AB12 and AC29 mesothelioma-bearing mice. Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of virotherapy were assessed by evaluating the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), virus detection in tumor tissues and ascites, virus growth curves, and comparison of overall survival. After i.p. injection of GLV-0b347, virus was detected in both tumor cells and ascites. In comparison to mock-treated mice, overall survival was significantly prolonged, ascites was less frequent and PCI values declined. However, effective treatment was only observed in animals with limited tumor burden at the time point of virus application. Nonetheless, intraperitoneal virotherapy with GLV-0b347 might constitute a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma. Additional treatment modifications and combinational regimes will be investigated to further enhance treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can Yurttas
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany (A.K.)
- Virotherapy Center Tübingen (VCT), Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Julia Beil
- Virotherapy Center Tübingen (VCT), Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine VIII, Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Susanne Berchtold
- Virotherapy Center Tübingen (VCT), Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine VIII, Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Irina Smirnow
- Virotherapy Center Tübingen (VCT), Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine VIII, Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Linus D. Kloker
- Virotherapy Center Tübingen (VCT), Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine VIII, Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Bence Sipos
- Department of Internal Medicine VIII, Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- BAG für Pathologie und Molekularpathologie, Rosenbergstraße 12, 70176 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Markus W. Löffler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany (A.K.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC2180) “Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies”, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Interfaculty Institute for Cell Biology, Department of Immunology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 15, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 8, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany (A.K.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - André L. Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany (A.K.)
| | - Ulrich M. Lauer
- Virotherapy Center Tübingen (VCT), Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine VIII, Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Karolin Thiel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany (A.K.)
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, Oberschwaben Hospital Group, St Elisabethen-Klinikum, Elisabethenstr. 15, 88212 Ravensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Strohäker JKH, Brüschke MJ, Bachmann R, Mihaljevic AL, Ladurner R, Beltzer CR. Intraoperative bacterial cultures fail to reliably predict the bacterial spectrum encountered during infectious complications after appendicitis. Updates Surg 2024; 76:147-154. [PMID: 38062298 PMCID: PMC10806111 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01698-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency. Complicated appendicitis usually warrants perioperative antibiotic treatment in order to prevent infectious complications. Whether routine microbiological testing benefits the individual patient is a topic of debate. The goal of our study was to assess perioperative antibiotic prescriptions as well as the benefit of microbiological testing during the appendectomy as a predictor for bacteria encountered in infectious complications. This is a retrospective analysis of 1218 consecutive patients that underwent appendectomy at a tertiary referral center between 2014 and 2021. The patient charts were systematically analyzed regarding intraoperative outcome, microbiologic results, and postoperative infectious complications. 1218 patients were included in this study of which 768 were uncomplicated appendicitis (UA) and 450 were complicated appendicitis (CA). Microbiological testing was performed in 39.2% of UA cases (33.6% of which grew bacteria) compared to 74.9% of CA cases (78.6% positive cultures). The strongest individual predictors for SSI were gangrenous and perforated appendicitis. A total of 58 surgical-site infections developed, of which 49 were intra-abdominal fluid collections or abscesses. Thirty-two patients had revision surgery or CT-guided drainage for SSI. In the cases where microbiological testing was done both during the appendectomy and the SSI, 13/18 showed different bacteria on culture testing. The infectious outcome was favorable in 98.3%. While microbiological testing offers insights into resistance patterns, it is of little benefit for the individual patient, given the low predictive value for bacteria found during SSI. Achieving source control combined with empiric antibiotic coverage leads to favorable outcomes independent of culture results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens K H Strohäker
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Martin J Brüschke
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Robert Bachmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ruth Ladurner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van den Dop LM, Sneiders D, Yurtkap Y, Werba A, van Klaveren D, Pierik RE, Reim D, Timmermans L, Fortelny RH, Mihaljevic AL, Kleinrensink GJ, Tanis PJ, Lange JF, Jeekel J. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement vs. primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): long-term outcomes of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2024; 36:100787. [PMID: 38188275 PMCID: PMC10769887 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Background Incisional hernia occurs approximately in 40% of high-risk patients after midline laparotomy. Prophylactic mesh placement has shown promising results, but long-term outcomes are needed. The present study aimed to assess the long-term incisional hernia rates of the previously conducted PRIMA trial with radiological follow-up. Methods In the PRIMA trial, patients with increased risk of incisional hernia formation (AAA or BMI ≥27 kg/m2) were randomised in a 1:2:2 ratio to primary suture, onlay mesh or sublay mesh closure in three different countries in eleven institutions. Incisional hernia during follow-up was diagnosed by any of: CT, ultrasound and physical examination, or during surgery. Assessors and patients were blinded until 2-year follow-up. Time-to-event analysis according to intention-to-treat principle was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. Trial registration: NCT00761475 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Findings Between 2009 and 2012, 480 patients were randomized: 107 primary suture, 188 onlay mesh and 185 sublay mesh. Five-year incisional hernia rates were 53.4% (95% CI: 40.4-64.8), 24.7% (95% CI: 12.7-38.8), 29.8% (95% CI: 17.9-42.6), respectively. Compared to primary suture, onlay mesh (HR: 0.390, 95% CI: 0.248-0.614, p < 0.001) and sublay mesh (HR: 0.485, 95% CI: 0.309-0.761, p = 0.002) were associated with a significantly lower risk of incisional hernia development. Interpretation Prophylactic mesh placement remained effective in reducing incisional hernia occurrence after midline laparotomy in high-risk patients during long-term follow-up. Hernia rates in the primary suture group were higher than previously anticipated. Funding B. Braun.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yagmur Yurtkap
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander Werba
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Daniel Reim
- Department of Surgery, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Lucas Timmermans
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - André L. Mihaljevic
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Gert-Jan Kleinrensink
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J. Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johan F. Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes Jeekel
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mitzkat A, Mink J, Arnold C, Mahler C, Mihaljevic AL, Möltner A, Trierweiler-Hauke B, Ullrich C, Wensing M, Kiesewetter J. Development of individual competencies and team performance in interprofessional ward rounds: results of a study with multimodal observations at the Heidelberg Interprofessional Training Ward. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1241557. [PMID: 37828945 PMCID: PMC10566636 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1241557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Interprofessional training wards (IPTW) aim to improve undergraduates' interprofessional collaborative practice of care. Little is known about the effects of the different team tasks on IPTW as measured by external assessment. In Heidelberg, Germany, four nursing and four medical undergraduates (= one cohort) care for up to six patients undergoing general surgery during a four-week placement. They learn both professionally and interprofessionally, working largely on their own responsibility under the supervision of the medical and nursing learning facilitators. Interprofessional ward rounds are a central component of developing individual competencies and team performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate individual competencies and team performance shown in ward rounds. Methods Observations took place in four cohorts of four nursing and four medical undergraduates each. Undergraduates in one cohort were divided into two teams, which rotated in morning and afternoon shifts. Team 1 was on morning shift during the first (t0) and third (t1) weeks of the IPTW placement, and Team 2 was on morning shift during the second (t0) and fourth (t1) weeks. Within each team, a tandem of one nursing and one medical undergraduate cared for a patient room with three patients. Ward round observations took place with each team and tandem at t0 and t1 using the IP-VITA instrument for individual competencies (16 items) and team performance (11 items). Four hypotheses were formulated for statistical testing with linear mixed models and correlations. Results A total of 16 nursing and medical undergraduates each were included. There were significant changes in mean values between t0 and t1 in individual competencies (Hypothesis 1). They were statistically significant for all three sum scores: "Roles and Responsibilities", Patient-Centeredness", and "Leadership". In terms of team performance (Hypothesis 2), there was a statistically significant change in mean values in the sum score "Roles and Responsibilities" and positive trends in the sum scores "Patient-Centeredness" and "Decision-Making/Collaborative Clinical Reasoning". Analysis of differences in the development of individual competencies in the groups of nursing and medical undergraduates (Hypothesis 3) showed more significant differences in the mean values of the two groups in t0 than in t1. There were significant correlations between individual competencies and team performance at both t0 and t1 (Hypothesis 4). Discussion The study has limitations due to the small sample and some sources of bias related to the external assessment by means of observation. Nevertheless, this study offers insights into interprofessional tasks on the IPTW from an external assessment. Results from quantitative and qualitative analysis of learners self-assessment are confirmed in terms of roles and responsibilities and patient-centeredness. It has been observed that medical undergraduates acquired and applied skills in collaborative clinic reasoning and decision-making, whereas nursing undergraduates acquired leadership skills. Within the study sample, only a small group of tandems remained constant over time. In team performance, the group of constant tandems tended to perform better than the group of random tandems. The aim of IPTW should be to prepare healthcare team members for the challenge of changing teams. Therefore, implications for IPTW implementation could be to develop learning support approaches that allow medical and nursing undergraduates to bring interprofessional competencies to team performance, independent of the tandem partner or team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anika Mitzkat
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johanna Mink
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Arnold
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Mahler
- Department of Nursing Science, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - André L. Mihaljevic
- Department of General Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Möltner
- Department of Medical Examinations, Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Charlotte Ullrich
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Kiesewetter
- Institute of Medical Education, LMU University Hospital, LMU München, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heger P, Hackert T, Diener MK, Feißt M, Klose C, Dörr-Harim C, Möhlenbrock F, Büchler MW, Mihaljevic AL. Conventional partial pancreatoduodenectomy versus an extended pancreatoduodenectomy (triangle operation) for pancreatic head cancers-study protocol for the randomised controlled TRIANGLE trial. Trials 2023; 24:363. [PMID: 37254179 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07337-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth most frequent cause of cancer-related death in the Western world, and its incidence is rising. In patients that undergo curative resection, local recurrence (LR) is frequent. A recently described surgical technique of extended pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) termed the TRIANGLE operation has been proposed as a promising approach to reduce LR and improve disease-free survival in PDAC patients. METHODS The TRIANGLE trial is a multicentre confirmatory randomised controlled superiority trial with two parallel study groups. A total of 270 patients with suspected or histologically confirmed pancreatic head cancer scheduled for PD will be included in the trial and randomly assigned to the intervention group (extended PD defined as Inoue level 3 dissection along the superior mesenteric and celiac artery as well as removal of all soft tissue in the so-called triangle between the celiac artery, the SMA and the mesenterico-portal axis) or the control group (conventional PD with lymphadenectomy and removal of soft tissue according to current guidelines). The primary endpoint of the trial will be the disease-free survival of patients. Other perioperative outcomes as well as oncological parameters and patient-reported outcomes will be analysed as secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION Despite multimodal treatment, LR remains high and disease-free survival is limited following PD for PDAC. The TRIANGLE operation could address these shortcomings of conventional PD as indicated in several retrospective studies. However, this technique could be associated with more adverse events for patients including intractable diarrhoea. The TRIANGLE trial will close the evidence gap as well as offer a risk-benefit assessment of this more radical approach to PD. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030576 (UTN U1111-1243-4412) 19th December 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Heger
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery and Clinical Trial Centre of the Department of General and Visceral Surgery (ulmCARES), University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Ulm University, Meyerhofstraße M28, Ulm, 89081, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feißt
- Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Klose
- Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Dörr-Harim
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery and Clinical Trial Centre of the Department of General and Visceral Surgery (ulmCARES), University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Friedhelm Möhlenbrock
- Arbeitskreis der Pankreatektomierten e.V, Thomas-Mann-Straße 40, 53111, Bonn, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery and Clinical Trial Centre of the Department of General and Visceral Surgery (ulmCARES), University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Medical Faculty, Ulm University, Meyerhofstraße M28, Ulm, 89081, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mitzkat A, Mink J, Arnold C, Krug K, Mahler C, Trierweiler-Hauke B, Wensing M, Kiesewetter J, Mihaljevic AL, Ullrich C. [Measuring individual competencies and team performance in clinical learning settings of interprofessional collaborative practice: Empirical development of the Interprofessional Ward Round Individual and Team Assessment Tool (IP-VITA)]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2023:S1865-9217(23)00060-0. [PMID: 37236848 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interprofessional training wards (IPTW) can contribute to the development of interprofessional competencies. In order to evaluate the acquisition of competencies, instruments are needed that record both team performance and individual competencies in the clinical teaching setting in third-party assessment. This paper describes the Interprofessional Ward Round Individual and Team Assessment-Tool, IP-VITA ("Interprofessionelle Visiten Individual und Team Assessment Tool") and its development. METHOD Based on the empirical exploration of the three observation instruments "Teamwork Assessment Scale" (TAS), "McMaster-Ottawa Scale" and "Individual Teamwork Observation and Feedback Tool" (iTOFT) in at least four rounds each at the HIPSTA (with n=8 students and trainees each), a preliminary version of the IP-VITA was created. This preliminary version was then refined in subsequent empirical steps: a consensual validation in the research team was followed by a "member check" with the clinical colleagues of the HIPSTA, the input from external experts and an empirical test in an alternative setting. RESULTS The IP-VITA is an empirically developed multimodal instrument to assess the interprofessional competencies of trainees and students as well as their team performance in clinical settings with patient interaction. It comprises three parts. In part A, structural data, the persons involved and the essential patient characteristics are recorded. Part B consists of 12 items and a free-text field for recording behaviour at the individual level. Part C also consists of 12 items and evaluates behaviour at team level. DISCUSSION The IP-VITA instrument was developed specifically for the context of evaluating interprofessional ward rounds in a clinical educational setting. The instrument takes into account the ambiguous position of the assessment of interprofessional collaboration between individual competence and team performance. Beyond the HIPSTA, it can be used as a formative assessment instrument, and it may also be useful for summative assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anika Mitzkat
- Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - Johanna Mink
- Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Christine Arnold
- Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Katja Krug
- Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Cornelia Mahler
- Abteilung Pflegewissenschaft, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke
- Klinik für Allgemein- Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Michel Wensing
- Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Jan Kiesewetter
- Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Universitätsklinikum München, München, Deutschland
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - Charlotte Ullrich
- Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mink J, Zurek B, Götsch B, Mihaljevic AL, Mitzkat A, Trierweiler-Hauke B, Mahler C. How do former medical and nursing undergraduates describe their learning on an interprofessional training Ward 12-18 months later? - A retrospective qualitative analysis. BMC Med Educ 2023; 23:275. [PMID: 37085857 PMCID: PMC10122365 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04212-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interprofessional training wards (IPTWs) seem to deliver good results in terms of development of interprofessional competencies. However, evidence of long-term effects of these training wards on learners' competency development is lacking and little is known about retrospective evaluation of IPTWs. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the retrospective evaluation of competency development and interprofessional collaboration of former undergraduates 12 or more months after a placement on an IPTW. METHODS Eight follow-up interviews were conducted with four nursing and four medical professionals 12-18 months after they had finished a placement on an ITPW throughout their vocational training. Interviews were translated verbatim and analysed deductively and inductively based on qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The qualitative content analyses deductively identified two main categories regarding the research question, namely the uniqueness of the programme and interprofessional competencies developed by the Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Sub categories were identified inductively, representing the perceived competency development and the learning opportunities on the IPTW as compared to other clinical placements throughout vocational training and in transition to practice. Interviewees seemed to have developed competencies that are important for interprofessional collaboration such as communication, roles and responsibilities, as well as competencies in patient care and management. Considered beneficial for learning were the opportunity to work self-responsibly and the interprofessional collaboration on the IPTW, both of which were neither possible in almost any other placement nor in transition to practice. CONCLUSION Findings show that IPTWs can be sufficient in competency development and role clarification and are perceived positively by learners, but structures in clinical practice can impede sustaining competency development and efficient interprofessional collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Mink
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Bianka Zurek
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Sociology, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Burkhard Götsch
- Nursing School, Academy of Health Professions Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Anika Mitzkat
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mahler
- Department of Nursing Science, University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tanaka M, Heckler M, Mihaljevic AL, Ei S, Klaiber U, Heger U, Büchler MW, Hackert T. ASO Visual Abstract: Induction Chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Simple Scoring System to Predict Effect and Prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2411-2412. [PMID: 36175714 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12606-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Tanaka
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Max Heckler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Shigenori Ei
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulla Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrike Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Klotz R, Holze M, Dörr-Harim C, Grohmann E, Nied B, Lebert B, Weg-Remers S, Lutz C, Meißler K, Schloss P, Ullrich C, Frankenhauser S, Lutter H, Bühler D, Ahmed A, Gronlund T, Mihaljevic AL. Top 10 research priorities in colorectal cancer: results from the Colorectal Cancer Priority-Setting Partnership. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1561-1568. [PMID: 35579718 PMCID: PMC10020251 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04042-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cause of cancer death in the word. Which aspects of research into CRC should be accorded the highest priority remains unclear, because relevant stakeholders, such as patients, nurses, and physicians, played hardly any part in the development of research projects. The goal in forming the CRC Priority-Setting Partnership (PSP) was to bring all relevant stakeholders together to identify and prioritize unresolved research questions regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of CRC. METHODS The CRC PSP worked in cooperation with the British James Lind Alliance. An initial nationwide survey was conducted, and evidence uncertainties were collected, categorized, summarized, and compared with available evidence from the literature. The as-yet unresolved questions were (provisionally) ranked in a second national wide survey, and at a concluding consensus workshop all stakeholders came together to finalize the rankings in a nominal group process and compile a top 10 list. RESULTS In the first survey (34% patients, 51% healthcare professionals, 15% unknown), 1102 submissions were made. After exclusion of duplicates and previously resolved questions, 66 topics were then ranked in the second survey (56% patients, 39% healthcare professionals, 5% unknown). This interim ranking process revealed distinct differences between relatives and healthcare professionals. The final top 10 list compiled at the consensus workshop covers a wide area of research topics. CONCLUSION All relevant stakeholders in the CRC PSP worked together to identify and prioritize the top 10 evidence uncertainties. The results give researchers and funding bodies the opportunity to address the most patient-relevant research projects. It is the first detailed description of a PSP in Germany, and the first PSP on CRC care worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Klotz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Study Centre of the German Society of Surgery, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Magdalena Holze
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Study Centre of the German Society of Surgery, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Dörr-Harim
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Department of Surgery (ulmCARES), Clinical Trial Centre, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Barbara Nied
- National Directorate, Deutsche ILCO e.V., Bonn, Germany
| | - Burkhard Lebert
- Academy for Healthcare Professions Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Weg-Remers
- Cancer Information Center, German National Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia Lutz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karin Meißler
- Frauenselbsthilfe Krebs Bundesverband e.V., Bonn, Germany
| | - Patrick Schloss
- Baden-Württemberg Section, Deutsche ILCO e.V., Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Charlotte Ullrich
- Department of General Medicine and Healthcare Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Frankenhauser
- Department of Interdisciplinary Emergency Rescue and Trauma Medicine, BG Hospital, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | | | - Diedrich Bühler
- National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds, Berlin, Germany
| | - Azaz Ahmed
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Toto Gronlund
- James Lind Alliance, National Institute for Health Research Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - André L. Mihaljevic
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Department of Surgery (ulmCARES), Clinical Trial Centre, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tanaka M, Heckler M, Mihaljevic AL, Ei S, Klaiber U, Heger U, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Induction Chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Simple Scoring System to Predict Effect and Prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2401-2408. [PMID: 36153440 PMCID: PMC10027766 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12569-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective chemotherapy (CTx) protocols as induction treatment provide increasing opportunities for surgical resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Although improved survival after resection of LAPC with CTx has been reported for selected patients, reliable recommendations on the indication for conversion surgery after induction treatment are currently lacking. We investigated the factors predictive of prognosis in resected LAPC after FOLFIRINOX. METHODS Consecutive patients with LAPC undergoing curative resection after FOLFIRINOX between 2011 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Relevant clinical parameters and CT findings were examined. A scoring system was developed based on the ratio of hazard ratios for overall survival of all significant predictors. RESULTS A total of 62 patients with LAPC who underwent oncologic resection after FOLFIRINOX were analyzed. Tumor shrinkage, tumor density, and postchemotherapy CA19-9 serum levels were independently associated with overall survival (multivariate analysis: HR = 0.31, 0.17, and 0.18, respectively). One, two, and two points were allocated to these three factors in the proposed scoring system, respectively. The median overall survival of patients with a score from 0 to 2 was significantly shorter than that of patients with a score from 3 to 5 (22.1 months vs. 53.2 months, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Tumor density is a novel predictive marker for the prognosis of patients with resected LAPC after FOLFIRINOX. A simple scoring model incorporating tumor density, the tumor shrinkage rate, and CA 19-9 levels identifies patients with a low score, who may be candidates for additional treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Tanaka
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Minato City, Japan
| | - Max Heckler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Shigenori Ei
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulla Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrike Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Müller S, Weyhe D, Herrle F, Horvath P, Bachmann R, von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt V, Heger P, Nasir N, Klose C, Ritz A, Sander A, Grohmann E, Dörr-Harim C, Mihaljevic AL. Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence-a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial). Trials 2023; 24:76. [PMID: 36726155 PMCID: PMC9890770 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07089-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incisional hernia is a frequent complication following loop ileostomy reversal. Incisional hernias are associated with morbidity, loss of health-related quality of life and costs and warrant the investigation of prophylactic measures. Prophylactic mesh implantation at the time of surgical stoma reversal has shown to be a promising and safe method to prevent incisional hernias in this setting. However, the efficacy of this method has not yet been investigated in a large multicentre randomised-controlled trial (RCT) with adequate external validity. The P.E.L.I.O.N. trial will evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic mesh reinforcement after loop ileostomy closure in decreasing the rate of incisional hernia versus standard closure alone. METHODS P.E.L.I.O.N. is a multicentre, patient- and observer-blind RCT. Patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure will undergo intraoperative 1:1 randomisation into either abdominal wall closure with a continuous slowly absorbable suture in small-stitch technique without mesh reinforcement (control group) or abdominal wall closure with an additional reinforcement with a retromuscular non-absorbable, macro-pore (pore size ≥ 1000 μm or effective porosity >0%) light-weight monofilament or mixed structure mesh. A total of 304 patients (152 per group) will need to be randomised in the study. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1,014 patients are expected to be screened for eligibility in order to recruit the necessary number of patients. The primary endpoint will be the frequency of incision hernias within 24 months according to the European Hernia Society definition. Secondary endpoints will be the frequency of surgical site occurrences (including surgical site infections, wound seromas and hematomas, and enterocutaneous fistulas), postoperative pain, the number of revision surgeries and health-related quality of life. Safety will be assessed by measuring postoperative complications ≥ grade 3 according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. DISCUSSION Depending on the results of the P.E.L.I.O.N. trial, prophylactic mesh implantation could become the new standard for loop ileostomy reversal. TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS00027921, U1111-1273-4657.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Müller
- Helios Klinikum Gifhorn, Campus 6, 38518 Gifhorn, Germany
| | - Dirk Weyhe
- grid.477704.70000 0001 0275 7806Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Oldenburg, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Georgstraße 12, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Florian Herrle
- grid.411778.c0000 0001 2162 1728Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Philipp Horvath
- grid.411544.10000 0001 0196 8249Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Robert Bachmann
- grid.411544.10000 0001 0196 8249Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Viktor von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Patrick Heger
- grid.410712.10000 0004 0473 882XDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery and Clinical Trial Centre Department of Surgery (ulmCARES), University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Nadir Nasir
- grid.410712.10000 0004 0473 882XDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery and Clinical Trial Centre Department of Surgery (ulmCARES), University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Christina Klose
- grid.7700.00000 0001 2190 4373Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Ritz
- grid.7700.00000 0001 2190 4373Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Sander
- grid.7700.00000 0001 2190 4373Institute of Medical Biometry (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Erich Grohmann
- Deutsche ILCO e. V., Nietzschestr. 11, 53177 Bonn, Germany
| | - Colette Dörr-Harim
- grid.410712.10000 0004 0473 882XDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery and Clinical Trial Centre Department of Surgery (ulmCARES), University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - André L. Mihaljevic
- grid.410712.10000 0004 0473 882XDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery and Clinical Trial Centre Department of Surgery (ulmCARES), University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jötten L, Steinkraus KC, Traub B, Graf S, Mihaljevic AL, Kornmann M, Michalski CW, Hüttner FJ. Impact of perioperative steroid administration in patients undergoing elective liver resection: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6:6947850. [PMID: 36537738 PMCID: PMC9764439 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative steroid administration may improve postoperative outcomes in major abdominal surgery by reducing the systemic inflammatory response. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of perioperative steroid administration on outcomes after elective liver resection. METHODS PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing perioperative steroid administration with placebo, standard of care, or no steroids with respect to postoperative outcomes, particularly postoperative complications. Two independent reviewers critically appraised the studies and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model with ORs calculated for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes. RESULTS Ten RCTs comprising 930 patients were included. Perioperative steroid administration significantly reduced the overall postoperative complication rate (OR 0.61, 95 per cent c.i. 0.43 to 0.87; P = 0.006; I2 = 26 per cent). No significant differences were shown for individual complications. Several postoperative laboratory parameters were positively affected, like total serum bilirubin (MD -0.46; 95 per cent c.i. -0.74 to -0.18; P = 0.001; I2 = 80 per cent), interleukin 6 (MD -48.99; 95 per cent c.i. -60.72 to -37.27; P < 0.001; I2 = 0 per cent) and C-reactive protein (MD -5.20; 95 per cent c.i. -7.62 to -2.77; P < 0.001; I2 = 71 per cent). There were no signs of an increase in potential steroid-induced adverse events, namely infectious complications, thromboembolic events, or bleeding. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative steroid administration significantly reduces the overall complication rate after elective liver resection without an increased risk of adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila Jötten
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Kira C Steinkraus
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Benno Traub
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sandra Graf
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marko Kornmann
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Felix J Hüttner
- Correspondence to: Felix J. Hüttner, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schuh F, Fink MA, Feisst M, Eckert C, Dörr-Harim C, Knebel P, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Mihaljevic AL, Probst P. Protocol of a prospective study investigating the association of PAncreatic parenchymal RISk factors with postoperative pancreatic fistula after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PARIS trial). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054138. [PMID: 35418425 PMCID: PMC9013991 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is the treatment of choice for many malignant and benign diseases of the pancreatic head. Postoperative complication rates of up to 40% are regularly reported. One of the most common and potentially life-threatening complication is the postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Parenchymal risk factors like main pancreatic duct diameter or texture of the pancreatic gland have already been identified in retrospective studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of parenchymal risk factors on POPF in a prospective manner. METHODS AND ANALYSIS All patients scheduled for elective PD at the Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery of the University of Heidelberg will be screened for eligibility. As diagnostic factors, diameter and texture of the pancreatic gland as well as radiological and histopathological features will be recorded. Furthermore, the new four class risk classification system by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) will be recorded. The postoperative course will be monitored prospectively. The primary endpoint will be the association of the main pancreatic duct size and the texture of the pancreatic gland on POPF according to the updated ISGPS definition. The diagnostic value of the above-mentioned factors for POPF will be evaluated in a univariable and multivariable analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION PARIS is a monocentric, prospective, diagnostic study to evaluate the association of parenchymal risk factors and the development of POPF approved by the Ethics Committee of the medical faculty of Heidelberg University (S-344/2019). Results will be available in 2022 and will be published at national and international meetings. With this knowledge, the intraoperative and perioperative decision-making process could be eased and improve the individual outcome of patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00017184.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Schuh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias A Fink
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feisst
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Eckert
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Dörr-Harim
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Phillip Knebel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mihaljevic AL, Michalski C, Kaisers U, Strunk G. [Patient-centeredness]. Chirurg 2022; 93:861-869. [PMID: 35391553 PMCID: PMC9399187 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01629-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Patientenorientierung entwickelt sich politisch und gesellschaftlich zum entscheidenden Leitbild unseres Gesundheitssystems, doch in der praktischen Umsetzung zeigen sich Probleme durch konfligierende Ziele und Interessen. Ziel der Arbeit Darstellung des Begriffs Patientenorientierung sowie möglicher Messmethoden mit besonderem Fokus auf den deutschen Sprachraum. Material und Methoden Narrative Übersichtsarbeit durch Literatursuche in Medline, der Cochrane Library, PsyINfo und CINHAL. Aus den Ergebnissen wird das Konzept von „Patient-Reported Experience Measures“ (PREMs) und ein PREM-System entwickelt. Ergebnisse Die Patientenorientierung ist kein abgeschlossenes theoretisches Konstrukt. Aktuell werden 16 Dimensionen der Patientenorientierung unterschieden. Die am weitesten verbreitete Messmethode zur Erfassung der Patientenorientierung sind PREMs. Anders als in anderen Ländern gibt es im Deutschen nur eine begrenzte Anzahl von PREMs, deren methodologische Messungsqualität häufig unklar ist. Wesentliche chirurgische Aspekte der Patientenversorgung werden durch vorliegende deutschsprachige PREMs nicht erfasst. Es wird ein PREM-System in deutscher Sprache entwickelt und der Forschungsbedarf aufgezeigt. Diskussion Anders als in anderen Ländern gibt es in deutscher Sprache kein zusammenhängendes PREM-System. Die systematische Erfassung der Patientenorientierung ist daher insbesondere in der Chirurgie aktuell nicht adäquat möglich. Wesentliche methodologische, organisatorische, regulatorische und finanzielle Aspekte müssen bewältigt werden, bevor die Patientenorientierung als fundiertes Konstrukt im klinischen Alltag implementiert werden kann.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André L Mihaljevic
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.
| | - Christoph Michalski
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - Udo Kaisers
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland
| | - Guido Strunk
- Executive Academy, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020, Wien, Österreich.,Complexity-Research, Schönbrunner Str. 32/3/20, 1050, Wien, Österreich
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Loos M, Kester T, Klaiber U, Mihaljevic AL, Mehrabi A, Müller-Stich BM, Diener MK, Schneider MA, Berchtold C, Hinz U, Feisst M, Strobel O, Hackert T, Büchler MW. Arterial Resection in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Effective After a Learning Curve. Ann Surg 2022; 275:759-768. [PMID: 33055587 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the perioperative and oncologic long-term outcomes of patients with LAPC after surgical resection at a high-volume center for pancreatic surgery. BACKGROUND The role of surgery in LAPC with arterial involvement is controversial. METHODS We analyzed 385 consecutive patients undergoing PAR (n = 195) or PAD (n = 190) of the encased artery for LAPC between January 1, 2003 and April 30, 2019. RESULTS There were 183 total pancreatectomies, 113 partial pancreatoduodenectomies, 79 distal pancreatectomies, and 10 resections for tumor recurrences, including 121 multivisceral resections and 171 venous resections. Forty-three patients (11.4%) had resectable oligometastatic disease. All of the 190 patients undergoing PAD (100%) and 95 of the 195 patients undergoing PAR (48.7%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The R0 (circumferential resection margin negative) resection rate was 28%. The median hospital stay was 15 days (range: 3-236). The median survival after surgery for LAPC was 20.1 months and the overall 5-year survival rate 12.5%. In-hospital mortality was 8.8% for the entire patient cohort (n = 385). With increasing case load and growing expertise, there was a significant reduction of in-hospital mortality to 4.8% (n = 186) after 2013 (P = 0.005). The learning curve of experienced pancreatic surgeons for PAR was 15 such procedures. CONCLUSION Our data demonstrate that an arterial surgical approach is effective in LAPC with promising long-term survival. PAD after neoadjuvant treatment is safe. PAR is a technically demanding procedure and requires a high level of expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kester
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulla Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat M Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin A Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Berchtold
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulf Hinz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feisst
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kuner C, Doerr-Harim C, Feißt M, Klotz R, Heger P, Probst P, Strothmann H, Götsch B, Schmidt J, Mink J, Mitzkat A, Trierweiler-Hauke B, Mihaljevic AL. Clinical outcomes of patients treated on the Heidelberg interprofessional training ward vs. care on a conventional surgical ward: A retrospective cohort study. J Interprof Care 2022; 36:552-559. [PMID: 35297739 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1975667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Interprofessional training wards (IPTW) are a form of interprofessional education enabling trainees of different healthcare professions to work together in teams. Concerns about patient safety are a major barrier to the implementation of IPTWs. The objective of this retrospective study was to analyze patient relevant clinical outcomes on Germany's first IPTW (Heidelberger Interprofessionelle Ausbildungsstation; HIPSTA) in the Department of Surgery at University Hospital Heidelberg in comparison to a conventional surgical ward (CSW). The setting is a large tertiary care center with a focus on major oncological surgery. The endpoints were postoperative complications according to the Dindo-Clavien Classification and a set of patient-safety outcomes. In total, 232 patients treated on HIPSTA were retrospectively compared with 465 patients on a CSW. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. No significant difference between rate or severity of overall postoperative complications was observed. In-hospital mortality did not significantly differ between groups. However, the mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter on HIPSTA. Furthermore, HIPSTA patients had less frequent reoperations. Patient safety in surgical IPTW was not compromised in comparison to a CSW, and there were some areas where significantly better outcomes were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Kuner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Doerr-Harim
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feißt
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rosa Klotz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Strothmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Götsch
- Academy of Health Professions Heidelberg, Nursing School, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johanna Mink
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anika Mitzkat
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Klotz R, Hackert T, Heger P, Probst P, Hinz U, Loos M, Berchtold C, Mehrabi A, Schneider M, Müller-Stich BP, Strobel O, Diener MK, Mihaljevic AL, Büchler MW. The TRIANGLE operation for pancreatic head and body cancers: early postoperative outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:332-341. [PMID: 34294523 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.06.432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is the mainstay of potential cure for patients with pancreatic cancer, however, local recurrence is frequent. Previously, we have described an extended resection technique for pancreatoduodenectomy aiming at a radical resection of the nerve and lymphatic tissue between celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery and mesenteric-portal axis (TRIANGLE operation). Until now, data on postoperative outcome have not been reported, yet. METHODS Patients who underwent either partial (PD) or total pancreatoduodenectomy (TP) applying the TRIANGLE procedure were identified. These cohorts were compared to matched historic cohorts with standard resections. RESULTS Overall, 330 patients were analysed (PDTRIANGLE and PDSTANDARD, each n = 108; TPTRIANGLE and TPSTANDARD, each n = 57). More lymph nodes were harvested in TRIANGLE compared to standard resection (PD: 27.5 (21-35) versus 31.5 (24-40); P = 0.0187, TP: 33 (28-49) versus 44 (29-53); P = 0.3174) and the rate of tumour positive resections margins, R1(direct), dropped. Duration of operation was significantly longer and blood loss higher. Postoperative mortality and complications did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION Pancreatoduodenectomy according to the TRIANGLE protocol can be performed without increased morbidity and mortality at a high-volume centre. Long-term survival and quality of life need to be investigated in prospective clinical trials with adequate sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Klotz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulf Hinz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Berchtold
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tjaden C, Sandini M, Mihaljevic AL, Kaiser J, Khristenko E, Mayer P, Hinz U, Gaida MM, Berchtold C, Diener MK, Schneider M, Mehrabi A, Müller-Stich BP, Strobel O, Hackert T, Büchler MW. Risk of the Watch-and-Wait Concept in Surgical Treatment of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:818-825. [PMID: 34009233 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Importance The natural history of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) remains uncertain. The inconsistencies among published guidelines preclude accurate decision-making. The outcomes and potential risks of a conservative watch-and-wait approach vs a surgical approach must be compared. Objective To provide an overview of the surgical management of IPMNs, focusing on the time of resection. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was conducted in a single referral center; all patients with pathologically proven IPMN who received a pancreatic resection at the institution between October 2001 and December 2019 were analyzed. Preoperatively obtained images and the medical history were scrutinized for signs of progression and/or malignant features. The timeliness of resection was stratified into too early (adenoma and low-grade dysplasia), timely (intermediate-grade dysplasia and in situ carcinoma), and too late (invasive cancer). The perioperative characteristics and outcomes were compared between these groups. Exposures Timeliness of resection according to the final pathological findings. Main Outcomes and Measures The risk of malignant transformation at the final pathology. Results Of 1439 patients, 438 (30.4%) were assigned to the too early group, 504 (35.1%) to the timely group, and 497 (34.5%) to the too late group. Radiological criteria for malignant conditions were detected in 53 of 382 patients (13.9%), 149 of 432 patients (34.5%), and 341 of 385 patients (88.6%) in the too early, timely, and too late groups, respectively (P < .001). Patients in the too early group underwent more parenchyma-sparing resections (too early group, 123 of 438 [28.1%]; timely group, 40 of 504 [7.9%]; too late group, 5 of 497 [1.0%]; P < .001), while morbidity (too early group, 112 of 438 [25.6%]; timely group, 117 of 504 [23.2%]; too late group, 158 of 497 [31.8%]; P = .002) and mortality (too early group, 4 patients [0.9%]; timely, 4 [0.8%]; too late, 13 [2.6%]; P = .03) were highest in the too late group. Of the 497 patients in the too late group, 124 (24.9%) had a previous history of watch-and-wait care. Conclusions and Relevance Until the biology and progression patterns of IPMN are clarified and accurate guidelines established, a watch-and-wait policy should be applied with caution, especially in IPMN bearing a main-duct component. One-third of IPMNs reach the cancer stage before resection. At specialized referral centers, the risks of surgical morbidity and mortality are justifiable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Tjaden
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marta Sandini
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Kaiser
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Philipp Mayer
- Department of Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulf Hinz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias M Gaida
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute for Pathology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christoph Berchtold
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Loos M, Strobel O, Mehrabi A, Mihaljevic AL, Ramouz A, Dietrich M, Müller-Stich BP, Diener MK, Schneider M, Berchtold C, Al-Saeedi M, Feisst M, Hinz U, Schwab C, von Winterfeld M, Mayer P, Giannakis A, Weigand MA, Hackert T, Büchler MW. Postoperative acute pancreatitis is a serious but rare complication after distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1339-1348. [PMID: 33546896 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical relevance of hyperamylasemia after distal pancreatectomy (DP) remains unclear and no internationally accepted definition of postoperative acute pancreatitis (POAP) exists. The aim of this study was to characterize POAP after DP and to assess the role of serum amylase (SA) in POAP. METHODS Outcomes of 641 patients who had undergone DP between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. Postoperative SA was determined in all patients. POAP was defined based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or intraoperative findings during relaparotomy. RESULTS An elevation of SA on postoperative day 1 (hyperamylasemiaPOD1) was found in 398 patients (62.1%). Twelve patients (1.87%) were identified with POAP. Ten patients demonstrated radiologic criteria for POAP and in two patients POAP was diagnosed during relaparotomy. Outcome of POAP patients was worse than that of patients with hyperamylasemiaPOD1 alone and that with normal SAPOD1 without POAP evidence (postoperative pancreatic fistula 50% vs 30.6% vs 18.5%; length of hospital stay 26 days vs 12 vs 11, respectively). The overall 90-day mortality of all 641 patients was 0.6%. CONCLUSION POAP is a serious but rare complication after DP. HyperamylasemiaPOD1 is of prognostic relevance after DP, but it seems not sufficient as a single parameter to diagnose POAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Dietrich
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Berchtold
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammed Al-Saeedi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feisst
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulf Hinz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Constantin Schwab
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Philipp Mayer
- Department of Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Markus A Weigand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Herrmann Y, Starck T, Brindl N, Kitchen PJ, Rädeker L, Sebastian J, Köppel L, Tobian F, Souares A, Mihaljevic AL, Merle U, Hippchen T, Herth F, Knorr B, Welker A, Denkinger CM. Description and analysis of representative COVID-19 cases-A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0255513. [PMID: 34329364 PMCID: PMC8323911 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most data on COVID-19 was collected in hospitalized cases. Much less is known about the spectrum of disease in entire populations. In this study, we examine a representative cohort of primarily symptomatic cases in an administrative district in Southern Germany. METHODS We contacted all confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases in the administrative district. Consenting participants answered a retrospective survey either via a telephone, electronically or via mail. Clinical and sociodemographic features were compared between hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Additionally, we assessed potential risk factors for hospitalization and time to hospitalization in a series of regression models. RESULTS We included 897 participants in our study, 69% out of 1,305 total cases in the district with a mean age of 47 years (range 2-97), 51% of which were female and 47% had a pre-existing illness. The percentage of asymptomatic, mild, moderate (leading to hospital admission) and critical illness (requiring mechanical ventilation) was 54 patients (6%), 713 (79%), 97 (11%) and 16 (2%), respectively. Seventeen patients (2%) died. The most prevalent symptoms were fatigue (65%), cough (62%) and dysgeusia (60%). The risk factors for hospitalization included older age (OR 1.05 per year increase; 95% CI 1.04-1.07) preexisting lung conditions (OR 3.09; 95% CI 1.62-5.88). Female sex was a protective factor (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33-0.77). CONCLUSION This representative analysis of primarily symptomatic COVID-19 cases confirms age, male sex and preexisting lung conditions but not cardiovascular disease as risk factors for severe illness. Almost 80% of infection take a mild course, whereas 13% of patients suffer moderate to severe illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00022926. URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannis Herrmann
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- * E-mail: (CMD); (YH)
| | - Tim Starck
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niall Brindl
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip J. Kitchen
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Rädeker
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Sebastian
- Faculty of Medicine, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lisa Köppel
- Division of Tropical Medicine, Centre of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frank Tobian
- Division of Tropical Medicine, Centre of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aurélia Souares
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L. Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Merle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Theresa Hippchen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Herth
- Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Chest Hospital, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Britta Knorr
- Department of Public Health, Landratsamt Rhein-Neckar, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Welker
- Department of Public Health, Landratsamt Rhein-Neckar, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudia M. Denkinger
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- * E-mail: (CMD); (YH)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wohlleber K, Heger P, Probst P, Engel C, Diener MK, Mihaljevic AL. Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:2429-2466. [PMID: 34283381 PMCID: PMC8405513 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important oncological outcome measures. The validation of HRQoL instruments for patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma is lacking. Furthermore, studies comparing different treatment options in respect to HRQoL are sparse. The objective of the systematic review and meta-analysis was, therefore, to identify all available HRQoL tools regarding primary liver cancer, to assess the methodological quality of these HRQoL instruments and to compare surgical, interventional and medical treatments with regard to HRQoL. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE. The methodological quality of all identified HRQoL instruments was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurements INstruments (COSMIN) standard. Consequently, the quality of reporting of HRQoL data was assessed. Finally, wherever possible HRQoL data were extracted and quantitative analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 124 studies using 29 different HRQoL instruments were identified. After the methodological assessment, only 10 instruments fulfilled the psychometric criteria and could be included in subsequent analyses. However, quality of reporting of HRQoL data was insufficient, precluding meta-analyses for 9 instruments. CONCLUSION Using a standardized methodological assessment, specific HRQoL instruments are recommended for use in patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. HRQoL data of patients undergoing treatment of primary liver cancers are sparse and reporting falls short of published standards. Meaningful comparison of established treatment options with regard to HRQoL was impossible indicating the need for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Wohlleber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ei S, Mihaljevic AL, Kulu Y, Kaiser J, Hinz U, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Enucleation for benign or borderline tumors of the pancreas: comparing open and minimally invasive surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:921-926. [PMID: 33087306 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The feasibility and safety of minimally invasive enucleation (ME) for benign or borderline pancreatic tumors is still unclear. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between ME and open enucleation (OE). METHODS All patients undergoing pancreatic enucleation between October 2001 and January 2020 were analyzed from a prospective database. Consecutive patients undergoing ME were compared with patients undergoing OE in a matched-pair analysis (1:2). RESULTS Of 358 patients, undergoing enucleation, 120 matched patients (ME n = 40, OE n = 80) were included. Patients undergoing ME had less blood loss (median 50 vs. 100 ml, P = 0.025) and had a higher proportion of patients discharged by 7 days, than patients undergoing OE (38% vs. 18%, P = 0.016). The rates of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and major complications (Clavien grade ≥ 3) were similar between both groups. Risk factor analysis for POPF B/C showed no significant parameters associated with POPF, including tumor size and proximity to the main pancreatic duct. CONCLUSION Compared with conventional OE, ME reduces the amount of bleeding and allows earlier postoperative discharge, without increasing the incidence of major complications. Thus, minimally invasive enucleation should be considered for benign tumors of the pancreas when technically and oncologically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigenori Ei
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yakup Kulu
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joerg Kaiser
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulf Hinz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Selgert L, Bender B, Hinding B, Federmann A, Mihaljevic AL, Post R, Jonietz A, Norcini J, Tekian A, Jünger J. Development, testing and generalizability of a standardized evaluation form for the assessment of patient-directed reports in the new final medical licensing examination in Germany. GMS J Med Educ 2021; 38:Doc71. [PMID: 33824907 PMCID: PMC7994883 DOI: 10.3205/zma001467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Background: As doctors often fail to explain diagnoses and therapies to patients in an understandable and appropriate way, the improvement of doctor-patient communication is essential. The current medical training and examinations are focused on verbal rather than on written communication. Following the premise of "assessment drives learning", the final medical licensing examination in Germany has been further developed by the German National Institute for state examinations in Medicine, Pharmacy and Psychotherapy (IMPP). As part of the discharge management the candidates have to prepare a report for the patient that is understandable and provides them with all important information about their stay in hospital. Aim: A standardized evaluation form for formative and summative feedback has been developed and tested with regard to applicability and the assurance of test quality criteria, especially the reliability to assess the written communication skills of the students. Methodology: In an expert consensus procedure, a draft for a standardized evaluation form was developed. This form was revised after an initial trial run on patient-directed reports written by students in their last year of medical studies. Afterwards twenty-one patient-directed reports were evaluated by fourteen different examiners. The reliability was tested by calculating the generalizability-coefficient and by analysing the inter-rater reliability. Results: The first test on the evaluation of the patient-directed reports indicated the practicability of the application and the usefulness of the evaluation form as an instrument for assessing the written communication skills of students. The analyses of the inter-rater reliability showed that the degree of agreement in the evaluations was partly different between two groups of examiners. The calculated G-coefficient indicates a high reliability. The content validity of the evaluation form was given through the comprehensive medical expertise in the development process. Conclusion: Assessing written patient-directed communication is a benefit of the newly developed last part of the medical licensing examination in Germany. Continuous formative assessment and feedback based on the evaluation form is intended to improve the written communication skills of future doctors. Furthermore, a better understanding of their diagnosis and treatment as well as a trusting relationship with their doctor may empower patients in the medical decision process and lead to fewer dismissal errors in the future. For consistent use of the evaluation form a standardized training of examiners should be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Selgert
- Institut für medizinische und pharmazeutische Prüfungsfragen (IMPP), Mainz, Germany
| | - Bernd Bender
- Institut für medizinische und pharmazeutische Prüfungsfragen (IMPP), Mainz, Germany
| | - Barbara Hinding
- Institut für medizinische und pharmazeutische Prüfungsfragen (IMPP), Mainz, Germany
| | - Aline Federmann
- Institut für medizinische und pharmazeutische Prüfungsfragen (IMPP), Mainz, Germany
| | - André L. Mihaljevic
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - John Norcini
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Department of Psychiatry, New York, USA
| | - Ara Tekian
- University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Medicine, Illinois, USA
| | - Jana Jünger
- Institut für medizinische und pharmazeutische Prüfungsfragen (IMPP), Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mihaljevic AL. Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures PRO-CTCAE and CAT EORTC QLQ-C30 in Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery (PATRONUS): A Student-Initiated German Medical Audit (SIGMA) Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:3075-3089. [PMID: 33683524 PMCID: PMC8119276 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09646-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background The patient-reported outcomes (PRO) version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) and the computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the EORTC quality-of-life questionnaire QLQ-C30 have been proposed as new PRO measures in oncology; however, their implementation in patients undergoing cancer surgery has not yet been evaluated. Methods Patients undergoing elective abdominal cancer surgery were enrolled in a prospective multicenter study, and postoperative complications were recorded according to the Dindo–Clavien classification. Patients reported PRO data using the CAT EORTC QLQ-C30 and the PRO-CTCAE to measure 12 core cancer symptoms. Patients were followed-up for 6 months postoperatively. The study was carried out by medical students of the CHIR-Net SIGMA study network. Results Data of 303 patients were obtained and analyzed across 15 sites. PRO-CTCAE symptoms ‘poor appetite’, ‘fatigue’, ‘exhaustion’ and ‘sleeping problems’ increased after surgery and climaxed 10–30 days postoperatively. At 3–6 months postoperatively, no PRO-CTCAE symptom differed significantly to baseline. Patients reported higher ‘social functioning’ (p = 0.021) and overall quality-of-life scores (p < 0.05) 6 months after cancer surgery compared with the baseline level. There was a lack of correlation between postoperative complications or death and any of the PRO items evaluated. Feasibility endpoints for student-led research were met. Conclusion The two novel PRO questionnaires were successfully applied in surgical oncology. Postoperative complications do not affect health-reported quality-of-life or common cancer symptoms following major cancer surgery. The feasibility of student-led multicenter clinical research was demonstrated, but might be enhanced by improved student training. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09646-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mihaljevic AL. ASO Author Reflections: The Magic of Clinical Research-The Student-Led PATRONUS Study Unveils Two Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Surgical Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:3090-3091. [PMID: 33619669 PMCID: PMC8119395 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09648-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Klotz R, Dörr-Harim C, Bruckner T, Knebel P, Diener MK, Hackert T, Mihaljevic AL. Evaluation of robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy-study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial (EUROPA, DRKS00020407). Trials 2021; 22:40. [PMID: 33419452 PMCID: PMC7796523 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04933-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is the indicated surgical procedure for a wide range of benign and malignant diseases of the pancreatic head and distal bile duct and offers the only potential cure for pancreatic head cancer. The current gold standard, open PD (OPD) performed via laparotomy, is associated with morbidity in around 40% of cases, even at specialised centres. Robotic PD (RPD) might offer a viable alternative to OPD and has been shown to be feasible. Encouraging perioperative results have been reported for RPD in a number of small, non-randomised studies. However, since those studies showed a considerable risk of bias, a thorough comparison of RPD with OPD is warranted. Methods The EUROPA (EvalUation of RObotic partial PAncreatoduodenectomy) trial is designed as a randomised controlled unblinded exploratory surgical trial with two parallel study groups. A total of 80 patients scheduled for elective PD will be randomised after giving written informed consent. Patients with borderline or non-resectable carcinoma of the pancreatic head as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, distant metastases or an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score > III will be excluded. The experimental intervention, RPD, will be compared with the control intervention, OPD. An intraoperative dropout of approximately eight patients per group is expected because they may receive another type of surgical procedure than planned. Overall, 64 patients need to be analysed. The primary endpoint of the trial is overall postoperative morbidity within 90 days after index operation, measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The secondary endpoints include the feasibility of recruitment and assessment of clinical, oncological and safety parameters and quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Discussion The EUROPA trial is the first randomised controlled trial comparing RPD with OPD. Differences in postoperative morbidity will be evaluated to design a future multicentre confirmatory efficacy trial. Trial registration German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00020407. Registered on 9 March 2020
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Klotz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Dörr-Harim
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Knebel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Golriz M, Sabagh M, Mohammadi S, Ghamarnejad O, Khajeh E, Mieth M, Al-Saeedi M, Diener MK, Mihaljevic AL, Morath C, Zeier M, Kulu Y, Mehrabi A. PREventive effect of FENestration with and without clipping on post-kidney transplantation lymphatic complications (PREFEN): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e032286. [PMID: 33051226 PMCID: PMC7554503 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peritoneal fenestration is an effective preventive method for reducing the rate of lymphatic complications in kidney transplantation (KTx). The size of the fenestration plays an important role in its effectiveness. A large peritoneal window is no longer indicated, due to herniation and difficulties in performing biopsies. Small preventive fenestration is effective but will be closed too early. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether metal clips around the edges of a small fenestration result in optimal effects with minimum fenestration size. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This trial has been initiated in July 2019 and is expected to last for 2 and a half years. All patients older than 18 years, who receive kidneys from deceased donors, will be included. The kidney recipients will be randomly allocated to either a control arm (small fenestration alone) or an intervention arm (small fenestration with clipping). All fenestrations will be round, maximum 2 cm, and close to the kidney hilum. Clipping will be performed with eight metal clips around the peritoneal window (360°) in every 45° in an oblique position. The primary endpoint is the incidence of symptomatic post-KTx lymphatic complications, which require interventional treatment within 6 months after KTx. Secondary endpoints are intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, including blood loss, operation time, severity grade of lymphocele/lymphorrhea and relative symptoms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This protocol study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Heidelberg (Registration Number S-318/2017). A Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials checklist is available for this protocol. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03682627).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Mohammadsadegh Sabagh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Sara Mohammadi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Mohammed Al-Saeedi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Christian Morath
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yakup Kulu
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Diener MK, Mihaljevic AL, Strobel O, Loos M, Schmidt T, Schneider M, Berchtold C, Mehrabi A, Müller-Stich BP, Jiang K, Neoptolemos JP, Hackert T, Miao Y, Büchler MW. Periarterial divestment in pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgery 2020; 169:1019-1025. [PMID: 33032819 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modern pancreatic cancer surgery changed with the introduction of effective neoadjuvant therapies. Complete tumor resection is the mainstay for long-term, disease-free, and overall survival and has been a prerequisite for decreasing local recurrence. The medial resection margin in the area of the superior mesenteric vessels limits the radicalness of the resection, especially in borderline and locally advanced cases. Therefore, the periarterial soft tissue around the peripancreatic visceral arteries must be completely cleared. This procedure, namely periarterial divestment, is technically demanding but often represents an alternative to arterial resection. OBJECTIVE Here we describe the technique and our initial experience with periarterial divestment along the peripancreatic visceral arteries during pancreatic surgery. This technique, in combination with previously published resection strategies, such as artery first maneuver and mesenterico-portal venous bypass first, enables tumor resection in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION Periarterial divestment can prevent the need for arterial resection in borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, especially after neoadjuvant therapy. The feasibility, improved safety, and oncologic equivalence of arterial divestment versus arterial resection for pancreatic cancer surgery must be evaluated by clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Berchtold
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kuirong Jiang
- Pancreas Centre, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, P.R. China
| | - John P Neoptolemos
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yi Miao
- Pancreas Centre, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, P.R. China
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hüttner FJ, Rooman I, Bouche G, Knebel P, Hüsing J, Mihaljevic AL, Hackert T, Strobel O, Büchler MW, Diener MK. Pancreatic resection with perioperative drug repurposing of propranolol and etodolac: trial protocol of the phase-II randomised placebo controlled PROSPER trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040406. [PMID: 32998931 PMCID: PMC7528424 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic cancer is the fourth-leading cause of cancer-related death in developed countries. Despite advances in systemic chemotherapy, the mainstay of curative therapy for non-metastatic disease is surgical resection. However, the perioperative period is characterised by stress and inflammatory reactions that can contribute to metastatic spread and disease recurrence. Catecholamines and prostaglandins play a crucial role in these reactions. Therefore, a drug repurposing of betablockers and cyclooxygenase inhibitors seems reasonable to attenuate tumour-associated inflammation by inhibiting psychological, surgical and inflammatory stress responses. This may cause a relevant antitumourigenic and antimetastatic effect during the perioperative period, a window for cancer-directed therapy that is currently largely unexploited. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a prospective, single-centre, two-arm randomised, patient and observer blinded, placebo-controlled, phase-II trial evaluating safety and feasibility of combined perioperative treatment with propranolol and etodolac in adult patients with non-metastatic cancer of the pancreatic head undergoing elective pancreatoduodenectomy. 100 patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria will be randomised to perioperative treatment for 25 days perioperatively with a combination of propranolol and etodolac or placebo. Primary outcome of interest will be safety in terms of serious adverse events and reactions within 3 months. Furthermore, adherence to trial medication will be assessed as feasibility outcomes. Preliminary efficacy data will be evaluated for the purpose of power calculation for a potential subsequent phase-III trial. The clinical trial is accompanied by a translational study investigating the mechanisms of action of the combined therapy on a molecular basis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The PROSPER-trial has been approved by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (reference number 4042875) and the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg (reference number AFmo-385/2018). The final trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at appropriate national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS DRKS00014054; EudraCT number: 2018-000415-25.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix J Hüttner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ilse Rooman
- The Anticancer Fund, Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Medical and Molecular Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | | | - Phillip Knebel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Hüsing
- Coordination Center for Clinical Trials, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schmidt T, Strobel O, Schneider M, Diener MK, Berchtold C, Mihaljevic AL, Mehrabi A, Müller-Stich BP, Hackert T, Büchler MW. Cavernous transformation of the portal vein in pancreatic cancer surgery-venous bypass graft first. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:1045-1050. [PMID: 32915294 PMCID: PMC7541372 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01974-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, several techniques have been introduced to allow safe oncologic resections of cancers of the pancreatic head. While resections of the mesenterico-portal axis became now a part of the routine treatment, patients with a cavernous transformation of the portal vein still pose a surgical challenge and are regularly deemed unresectable. OBJECTIVE Here, we describe a technique of initial venous bypass graft placement between the superior mesenteric vein or its tributaries and the portal vein before the resection of the pancreatic head. This approach avoids uncontrollable bleeding as well as venous congestion of the intestine with a continuous hepatic perfusion and facilitates oncologic resection of pancreatic head cancers. This technique, in combination with previously published resection strategies, enables tumor resection in locally advanced pancreatic head cancers. CONCLUSIONS Venous bypass graft first operations facilitate and enable the resection of the pancreatic head cancers in patients with a cavernous transformation of the portal vein thus rendering these patients resectable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Berchtold
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Heckler M, Mihaljevic AL, Winter D, Zhou Z, Liu B, Tanaka M, Heger U, Michalski CW, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Escherichia coli Bacterobilia Is Associated with Severe Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1802-1808. [PMID: 31325140 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04325-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefit of preoperative biliary stenting in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is controversially debated. Data from recent meta-analyses favor primary surgery for the majority of resectable pancreatic cancers. Regardless of this evidence, preoperative biliary stenting via endoscopy (EBS) is commonly performed, often before involvement of a surgeon. The goal of this study was to elucidate the association of bile duct stenting, microbiological dislocation of gut flora to the biliary compartment, and major postoperative complications. METHODS Patient data was derived from a prospectively maintained database including all pancreatic resections between January 2006 and December 2014. Patients receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease in the head of the pancreas with prior EBS were included. Microbiological data were obtained through conventional culture from intraoperative bile duct swabs. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-eight patients were enrolled in this study. Severe postoperative complications were associated with stent colonization: Postoperative pancreatic fistula type C occurred more frequently in E. coli-colonized patients (sample estimated odds ratio (OR) = 4.07), and the rate of lymphatic fistula was elevated in Enterococcus-colonized patients (OR = 3.25). Longer stenting duration (> 16 days) was associated with the prevalence of these bacteria. CONCLUSION Major surgical complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy, including severe pancreatic fistula, are associated with bacterobilia after EBS. The indication for bile duct stenting should be evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Heckler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dominik Winter
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Zhaoming Zhou
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bing Liu
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Masayuki Tanaka
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph W Michalski
- Department of Surgery, Halle University Hospital, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tanaka M, Heckler M, Mihaljevic AL, Probst P, Klaiber U, Heger U, Schimmack S, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Lymph Node Metastases of Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:1614-1624. [PMID: 32720049 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08850-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal surgical strategy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is unknown. However, current guidelines recommend a watch-and-wait strategy for small nonfunctional PNETs (NF-PNETs). The aim of this study is to investigate the risk stratification and prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis (LNM) of PNETs to guide decision-making for lymphadenectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies reporting either risk factors of LNM in resected PNETs or survival of patients with LNM. The weighted average incidence of LNM was calculated according to tumor characteristics. Random-effects metaanalyses were performed, and pooled hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine the impact of LNM on overall survival (OS). In subgroup analyses, NF-PNETs were assessed. RESULTS From a total of 5883 articles, 98 retrospective studies with 13,374 patients undergoing resection for PNET were included. In all PNETs, the weighted median rates of LNM were 11.5% for small (≤ 2 cm) PNETs and 15.8% for G1 PNETs. In NF-PNETs, the rates were 11.2% for small PNETs and 10.3% for G1 PNETs. LNM of all PNETs (HR 3.87, 95% CI 3.00-4.99, P < 0.001) and NF-PNETs (HR 4.98, 95% CI 2.81-8.83, P < 0.001) was associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS LNM is potentially prevalent even in small and well-differentiated PNETs and is associated with worse prognosis. A watch-and-wait strategy for small NF-PNETs should be reappraised, and oncologic resection with lymphadenectomy can be considered. Prospective and controlled studies are needed in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Tanaka
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Keio University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Max Heckler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulla Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Schimmack
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Klotz R, Doerr-Harim C, Ahmed A, Tjaden C, Tarpey M, Diener MK, Hackert T, Mihaljevic AL. Top ten research priorities for pancreatic cancer therapy. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:e295-e296. [PMID: 32502448 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30179-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Klotz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany; The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Colette Doerr-Harim
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Azaz Ahmed
- Department of Medical Oncology and Internal Medicine VI, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany; Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Tjaden
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Maryrose Tarpey
- James Lind Alliance, National Institute for Health Research Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany; The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany; The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Probst P, Tran DTA, Hüttner FJ, Harnoss JC, Heger P, Ritter AS, Doerr-Harim C, Mihaljevic AL, Knebel P, Schneider M, Büchler MW, Diener MK. Randomised-controlled feasibility trial on abdominal wall closure techniques in patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001). Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:427-434. [PMID: 32504207 PMCID: PMC7359135 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01903-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing relaparotomy are generally underrepresented in clinical trials, despite how common the procedure is in clinical practice. Specifically, techniques for re-do abdominal wall closure have never been evaluated in a randomised-controlled trial. The aim of this trial was to identify the optimal abdominal wall closure technique in patients undergoing relaparotomy. METHODS In this monocentric, randomised feasibility trial, patients scheduled for elective relaparotomy were randomised to abdominal wall closure with either the small stitches technique, using Monomax® 2-0, or the large stitches technique, using PDS II® 1 loop. Patients' postoperative courses were followed for 1 year after the index operation. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were compared at a level of significance of 5% between the two techniques. RESULTS A total of 100 out of 131 patients (76.3%) were evenly randomised to the small stitches and large stitches groups. The time for abdominal wall closure did not differ between the two techniques (small stitches 27.5 ± 9.5 min versus large stitches 25.3 ± 12.4 min; p = 0.334). The overall comprehensive complication index was 14.4 ± 15.5 in the small stitches group and 19.9 ± 23.4 in the large stitches group (p = 0.168). Specifically, rates of surgical site infection (small stitches 30.0% versus large stitches 36.0%; p = 0.524) and burst abdomen (small stitches 4.0% versus large stitches 0.0%; p = 0.495) did not differ. After 1 year, incisional hernia rate was 7.5% in the small stitches group and 10.0% in the large stitches group (p > 0.999). DISCUSSION Both abdominal wall closure techniques investigated in this trial were feasible in relaparotomy patients. This exploratory trial revealed no noticeable difference in the effectiveness or safety of the small stitches technique with Monomax® 2-0 versus the large stitches technique with PDS II® 1 loop. Therefore, surgeons should stay with their preferred suture technique in relaparotomy patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien ( www.germanctr.de ): DRKS00013001.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Dinh Thien-An Tran
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix J Hüttner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julian C Harnoss
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alina S Ritter
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Doerr-Harim
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Phillip Knebel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Baessler F, Weidlich J, Schweizer S, Ciprianidis A, Bartolovic M, Zafar A, Wolf M, Wagner FL, Baumann TC, Mihaljevic AL, Ditzen B, Roesch-Ely D, Nikendei C, Schultz JH. What and how are students taught about communicating risks to patients? Analysis of a medical curriculum. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233682. [PMID: 32470064 PMCID: PMC7259606 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Communication is a core competence in medical care. Failure of physicians to properly communicate inherent risks of medical interventions has been linked with inadequate training at school. This study analyses a medical curriculum for assessing the content and quality of teaching risk communication to students. Methods A checklist based on the national guidelines of core competencies on risk communication required of physicians was developed. Participant observers surveyed all teaching sessions at a medical school during a semester to record the frequency, characteristics and clinical context used by lectures during classes. Data were analyzed using statistical and descriptive methods to determine the prevalence and quality of teaching content. Results 231 teaching sessions were surveyed. The inter-rater reliability was 81%. Lecturers mentioned topics of risk communication in 61.5% of teaching sessions (83.7% in surgery, 43.3% in internal medicine) but core biostatistics concepts were not discussed in more than 80% of these sessions. Important topics such as patient safety and preventable diseases were underrepresented. Risk communication was mainly taught in large-group, theoretical sessions and rarely with supplementary teaching material (7.4%). Students asked questions in 15.2% of courses, more often in surgery classes than in internal medicine. Conclusion Statistical and clinical topics relevant for teaching risk communication to medical students are not only underrepresented but also minimally explained by lecturers. Supplementary material on risk communication is rarely provided to students during classes. High-resource demanding, small-group teaching formats are not necessarily interactive as students ask few questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Baessler
- Department of General, Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Joshua Weidlich
- Department of General, Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sophie Schweizer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Ciprianidis
- Department of General, Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marina Bartolovic
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Zafar
- Department of General, Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Wolf
- Department of General, Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabienne Louise Wagner
- Department of General, Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tabea Chiara Baumann
- Department of General, Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L. Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beate Ditzen
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Roesch-Ely
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Nikendei
- Department of General, Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jobst-Hendrik Schultz
- Department of General, Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Schwab M, Brindl N, Studier-Fischer A, Tu T, Gsenger J, Pilgrim M, Friedrich M, Frey PE, Achilles C, Leuck A, Bürgel T, Feisst M, Klose C, Tenckhoff S, Dörr-Harim C, Mihaljevic AL. Postoperative complications and mobilisation following major abdominal surgery with vs. without fitness tracker-based feedback (EXPELLIARMUS): study protocol for a student-led multicentre randomised controlled trial (CHIR-Net SIGMA study group). Trials 2020; 21:293. [PMID: 32293519 PMCID: PMC7092422 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4220-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative complications following major abdominal surgery are frequent despite progress in surgical technique and perioperative care. Early and enhanced postoperative mobilisation has been advocated to reduce postoperative complications, but it is still unknown whether it can independently improve outcomes after major surgery. Fitness trackers (FTs) are a promising tool to improve postoperative mobilisation, but their effect on postoperative complications and recovery has not been investigated in clinical trials. METHODS This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with two parallel study groups evaluating the efficacy of an enhanced and early mobilisation protocol in combination with FT-based feedback in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) to either the experimental group, which receives daily step goals and a FT giving feedback about daily steps, or the control group, which is mobilised according to hospital standards. The control group also receives a FT, however with a blackened screen; thus no FT-based feedback is possible. Randomisation will be stratified by type of surgery (laparoscopic vs. open). The primary endpoint of the study is postoperative morbidity within 30 days measured via the Comprehensive Complication Index. Secondary endpoints include number of steps as well as a set of functional, morbidity and safety parameters. A total of 348 patients will be recruited in 15 German centres. The study will be conducted and organised by the student-led German Clinical Trial Network SIGMA. DISCUSSION Our study aims at investigating whether the implementation of a simple mobilisation protocol in combination with FT-based feedback can reduce postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. If so, FTs would offer a cost-effective intervention to enhance postoperative mobilisation and improve patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS, German Clinical Trials Register): DRKS00016755, UTN U1111-1228-3320. Registered on 06.03.2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Schwab
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niall Brindl
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Tu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julia Gsenger
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Max Pilgrim
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mirco Friedrich
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pia-Elena Frey
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Achilles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Leuck
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thore Bürgel
- Health Data Science Unit, University Hospital Heidelberg, BioQuant, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feisst
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Klose
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Solveig Tenckhoff
- CHIR-Net Coordination Centre at the Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Dörr-Harim
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Klaiber U, Probst P, Hüttner FJ, Bruckner T, Strobel O, Diener MK, Mihaljevic AL, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Randomized Trial of Pylorus-Preserving vs. Pylorus-Resecting Pancreatoduodenectomy: Long-Term Morbidity and Quality of Life. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:341-352. [PMID: 30671796 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-04102-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The randomized controlled PROPP trial (DKRS00004191) showed that pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy (PR) is not superior to the pylorus-preserving procedure (PP) in terms of perioperative outcome, specifically in reduction of delayed gastric emptying. Non-superiority of PR was also confirmed in a recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. However, long-term data on morbidity and quality of life after PP compared to PR are sparse. The aim of this study was to investigate long-term outcomes of patients included in the PROPP trial. METHODS Between February 2013 and June 2016, a total of 188 patients underwent PD and were intraoperatively randomized to either preservation or resection of the pylorus (95 vs. 93 patients). For long-term follow-up, morbidity and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30/PAN26) were monitored until January 1, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS The mean duration of follow-up was 34.3 (± 11.3) months. Sixty-three of the 188 patients had died (PP n = 33, PR n = 30), 29 patients were lost to follow-up (PP n = 17, PR n = 12), and the remaining 96 patients were included in long-term follow-up (PP n = 45, PR n = 51). There was no difference between PP and PR patients regarding endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function, receipt of adjuvant/palliative chemotherapy, cancer recurrence, and other relevant characteristics. Late cholangitis occurred significantly more often in patients following pylorus resection (P = 0.042). Reoperations, readmissions to hospital, and quality of life scores except pain were comparable between the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS Similar to short-term results, long-term follow-up showed no significant differences between pylorus resection compared to pylorus preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulla Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix J Hüttner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Heger P, Feißt M, Krisam J, Klose C, Dörr-Harim C, Tenckhoff S, Büchler MW, Diener MK, Mihaljevic AL. Hernia reduction following laparotomy using small stitch abdominal wall closure with and without mesh augmentation (the HULC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019; 20:738. [PMID: 31842966 PMCID: PMC6915967 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3921-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Incisional hernias are among the most frequent complications following abdominal surgery and cause substantial morbidity, impaired health-related quality of life and costs. Despite improvements in abdominal wall closure techniques, the risk for developing an incisional hernia is reported to be between 10 and 30% following midline laparotomies. There have been two recent innovations with promising results to reduce hernia risks, namely the small stitches technique and the placement of a prophylactic mesh. So far, these two techniques have not been evaluated in combination. Methods The HULC trial is a multicentre, randomized controlled, observer- and patient-blinded surgical effectiveness trial with two parallel study groups. A total of 812 patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery via a midline laparotomy will be randomized in 12 centres after informed consent. Patients will be randomly assigned to the control group receiving closure of the midline incision with a slowly absorbable monofilament suture in the small stitches technique or to the intervention group, who will receive a small stitches closure followed by augmentation with a light-weight polypropylene mesh in the onlay technique. The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of incisional hernias, as defined by the European Hernia Society, within 24 months after surgery. Further perioperative parameters, as well as patient-reported outcomes, will be analysed as secondary outcomes. Discussion The HULC trial will address the yet unanswered question of whether a combination of small stitched fascial closure and onlay mesh augmentation after elective midline laparotomies reduces the risk of incisional hernias. The HULC trial marks the logical and innovative next step in the development of a safe abdominal closure technique. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00017517. Registered on 24th June 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feißt
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Krisam
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Klose
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Dörr-Harim
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Solveig Tenckhoff
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rädeker L, Schwab M, Frey PE, Friedrich M, Sliwinski S, Steinle J, Fink CA, Leuk A, Ganschow P, Ottawa GB, Klose C, Feißt M, Dörr-Harim C, Tenckhoff S, Mihaljevic AL. [Design and Evaluation of a Clinical Investigator Training for Student-lead Prospective Multicentre Clinical Trials: a CHIR-Net SIGMA Research-based Learning Project]. Zentralbl Chir 2019; 145:521-530. [PMID: 31658485 DOI: 10.1055/a-1007-1995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scientific skills are not sufficiently taught during medical training, neither in medical school nor during postgraduate education. This results in a lack of clinician scientists. In order to counter this problem, the surgical study network (CHIR-Net) founded SIGMA (Student-initiated German Medical Audit). This paper describes the development, performance and evaluation of a Clinical Investigator Training (CIT) aiming to qualify students to autonomously conduct clinical trials. MATERIAL AND METHODS Based on the Kern cycle, a curriculum was developed, composed of three parts: online tutorials, a workshop and a follow-up period. The educational objectives were defined according to Bloom's taxonomy of knowledge. The learning objectives were based on the requirements of the "Network of Coordinating Centers for Clinical Trials" and the German Medical Association as well as content relevant to clinical studies. A wide range of educational instruments and assessments were used. By including all relevant professional groups involved in clinical trials, an interconnected working environment for students was generated. The increase in knowledge was assessed by a multiple-choice pre/post exam. The satisfaction of participants was analysed by a 5-point Likert scale, on which 5 indicated full approval. RESULTS The first SIGMA CIT was realised in 2018; the workshop took place in Heidelberg in February. Thirty-two medical students from thirteen different centres participated. On average, 53.8 ± 8.3% of questions were answered correctly in the pre-test, compared with 71.2 ± 7.2% in the post-test (p < 0.0001). The maximal individual improvement was 30%; the lowest difference compared to the pre-test was 5%. Subjective evaluation results were positive with an average result of 4.63 ± 0.34 on a 5-point Likert scale. CONCLUSION It is feasible to teach medical students the fundamentals of clinical trials. A compact Clinical Investigator Training using modern principles of teaching is able to prepare students for an autonomous performance of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Rädeker
- Medizinische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Marius Schwab
- Medizinische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Pia Elena Frey
- Medizinische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Mirco Friedrich
- Medizinische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Svenja Sliwinski
- Medizinische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Julia Steinle
- Medizinische Fakultät, Fachbereich 05, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Deutschland
| | - Christoph A Fink
- Medizinische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Alexander Leuk
- Medizinische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Petra Ganschow
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, Deutschland
| | - Gregor Benedikt Ottawa
- Koordinierungszentrum für Klinische Studien (KKS), Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Christina Klose
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Informatik (IMBI), Medizinische Fakultät der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Manuel Feißt
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Informatik (IMBI), Medizinische Fakultät der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Colette Dörr-Harim
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Solveig Tenckhoff
- Studienzentrum der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Probst P, Hüttner FJ, Meydan Ö, Kalkum E, Kretschmer R, Jensen K, Kenngott HG, Mihaljevic AL, Hackert T, Büchler MW, Diener MK. Evidence map of pancreatic surgery: protocol for a living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e032353. [PMID: 31575583 PMCID: PMC6773280 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic surgery is a large and complex field of research. Several evidence gaps exist for specific diseases or surgical procedures. An overview on existing knowledge is needed to plan and prioritise future research. The aim of this project is to create a systematic and living evidence map of pancreatic surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A systematic literature search in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be performed searching for all randomised controlled trials (RCT) and systematic reviews (SR) on pancreatic surgery. RCT and SR will be grouped in research topics. Baseline and outcome data from RCT will be extracted, presented and effect sizes meta-analysed. Data from SR will be used to identify evidence gaps. A freely accessible web-based evidence map in the format of a mind map will be created. The evidence map and meta-analyses will be updated periodically. DISSEMINATION After completion of the project, a permanently updated evidence map of pancreatic surgery will be available to patients, physicians, researchers and funding bodies via www.evidencemap.surgery. Its use will allow clinical decision-making based on primary data and prioritisation of future research endeavours. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019133444.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix J Hüttner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ömer Meydan
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Kalkum
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Kretschmer
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katrin Jensen
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hannes G Kenngott
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tanaka M, Mihaljevic AL, Probst P, Heckler M, Klaiber U, Heger U, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Meta-analysis of recurrence pattern after resection for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1590-1601. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Revised: 04/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Initial recurrence mapping of resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) could help in stratifying patient subpopulations for optimal postoperative follow-up. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the initial recurrence patterns of PDAC and to correlate them with clinicopathological factors.
Methods
MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched systematically for studies reporting first recurrence patterns after PDAC resection. Data were extracted from the studies selected for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated to determine the clinicopathological factors related to the recurrence sites. The weighted average of median overall survival was calculated.
Results
Eighty-nine studies with 17 313 patients undergoing PDAC resection were included. The weighted median rates of initial recurrence were 20·8 per cent for locoregional sites, 26·5 per cent for liver, 11·4 per cent for lung and 13·5 per cent for peritoneal dissemination. The weighted median overall survival times were 19·8 months for locoregional recurrence, 15·0 months for liver recurrence, 30·4 months for lung recurrence and 14·1 months for peritoneal dissemination. Meta-analysis revealed that R1 (direct) resection (OR 2·21, 95 per cent c.i. 1·12 to 4·35), perineural invasion (OR 5·19, 2·79 to 9·64) and positive peritoneal lavage cytology (OR 5·29, 3·03 to 9·25) were significantly associated with peritoneal dissemination as initial recurrence site. Low grade of tumour differentiation was significantly associated with liver recurrence (OR 4·15, 1·71 to 10·07).
Conclusion
Risk factors for recurrence patterns after surgery could be considered for specific surveillance and treatments for patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tanaka
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Heckler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - U Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - U Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tanaka M, Heckler M, Mihaljevic AL, Probst P, Klaiber U, Heger U, Hackert T. Meta-analysis of effect of routine enteral nutrition on postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1138-1146. [PMID: 31241185 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal nutritional treatment after pancreatoduodenectomy is still unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of routine enteral nutrition following pancreatoduodenectomy on postoperative outcomes. METHODS RCTs comparing enteral nutrition (regular oral intake with routine tube feeding) with non-enteral nutrition (regular oral intake with or without parenteral nutrition) after pancreatoduodenectomy were sought systematically in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. Postoperative data were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to compare postoperative outcomes in the two arms, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) were calculated with 95 per cent confidence intervals. In subgroup analyses, the routes of nutrition were assessed. Percutaneous tube feeding and nasojejunal tube feeding were each compared with parenteral nutrition. RESULTS Eight RCTs with a total of 955 patients were included. Enteral nutrition was associated with a lower incidence of infectious complications (OR 0·66, 95 per cent c.i. 0·43 to 0·99; P = 0·046) and a shorter length of hospital stay (MD -2·89 (95 per cent c.i. -4·99 to -0·80) days; P < 0·001) than non-enteral nutrition. Percutaneous tube feeding had a lower incidence of infectious complications (OR 0·47, 0·25 to 0·87; P = 0·017) and a shorter hospital stay (MD -1·56 (-2·13 to -0·98) days; P < 0·001) than parenteral nutrition (3 RCTs), whereas nasojejunal tube feeding was not associated with better postoperative outcomes (2 RCTs). CONCLUSION As a supplement to regular oral diet, routine enteral nutrition, especially via a percutaneous enteral tube, may improve postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tanaka
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Heckler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - U Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - U Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kaiser J, Niesen W, Probst P, Bruckner T, Doerr-Harim C, Strobel O, Knebel P, Diener MK, Mihaljevic AL, Büchler MW, Hackert T. Abdominal drainage versus no drainage after distal pancreatectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019; 20:332. [PMID: 31174583 PMCID: PMC6555976 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3442-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The placement of prophylactic intra-abdominal drains has been common practice in abdominal operations including pancreatic surgery. The PANDRA trial showed that the omission of drains following pancreatic head resection was non-inferior to intra-abdominal drainage in terms of postoperative reinterventions and superior in terms of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rate and fistula-associated complications. The aim of the present PANDRA II trial is to evaluate the clinical outcome with versus without prophylactic drain placement after distal pancreatectomy. Methods The PANDRA II trial is a mono-center, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial with two parallel study groups. In the control group at least one passive intra-abdominal drain is placed at the pancreatic resection margin. In the experimental group no drains are placed. The primary endpoint of this trial will be the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) measuring all postoperative complications within 90 days. Secondary endpoints are in-hospital mortality and morbidity, including the rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula, chyle leak, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, reinterventions and reoperations, surgical site infection, and abdominal fascia dehiscence. Moreover, length of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit stay, and the rate of readmission after discharge from hospital (up to day 90 after surgery) are assessed. We will need to analyze 252 patients to test the hypothesis that no drainage is non-inferior to drain placement in terms of the CCI (δ 7.5 points) in a one-sided t test with a one-sided level of significance of 2.5% and a power of 80%. Discussion The results of the PANDRA II trial will help to evaluate the effect of an omission of prophylactic intraperitoneal drainage on the rate of complications after open or minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00013763. Registered on 6 March 2018. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3442-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joerg Kaiser
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Willem Niesen
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Doerr-Harim
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Phillip Knebel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tanaka M, Heckler M, Mihaljevic AL, Sun H, Klaiber U, Heger U, Büchler MW, Hackert T. CT response of primary tumor and CA19-9 predict resectability of metastasized pancreatic cancer after FOLFIRINOX. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1453-1459. [PMID: 30981446 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective chemotherapy protocols are currently changing the treatment options for metastasized pancreatic cancer. Survival benefits after synchronous metastasectomy have been reported for selected patients. We set out to assess predictive factors of resectability for synchronous metastases after FOLFIRINOX. METHODS Consecutive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery after FOLFIRINOX between 2011 and 2017 were identified from a prospectively collected database. Surgery following chemotherapy was indicated in patients with no more than six metastatic lesions, no progression detected on CT, and technically resectable disease. Patients who received synchronous metastasectomy were compared with patients who received explorative laparotomy or palliative surgery in terms of predictors of resectability and overall survival. In patients undergoing resection, prognostic factors were examined. RESULTS Of 101 patients scheduled for surgery after FOLFIRINOX, synchronous metastasectomy was performed in 43 cases (43%) and non-resection surgery in 58 cases (57%). The shrinkage rate of the primary tumor on CT (P = 0.04) and the postchemotherapy serum CA19-9 concentration (P = 0.02) were associated with resectability. The median overall survival of the patients undergoing metastasectomy was longer than that of the patients without resection (21.9 months vs 16.4 months, P = 0.006). Postchemotherapy serum CA19-9 value (P = 0.04) and lymph node ratio (P = 0.01) were prognostic factors in the patients undergoing metastasectomy. CONCLUSIONS In selected patients who satisfied our surgical criteria, shrinkage rate of primary tumor and postchemotherapy serum CA19-9 level, which predict resectability of metastasized pancreatic cancer, should be considered in decision making to avoid unnecessary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Tanaka
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Max Heckler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Huihui Sun
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Ulla Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Ulrike Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mink J, Mitzkat A, Mihaljevic AL, Trierweiler-Hauke B, Götsch B, Schmidt J, Krug K, Mahler C. The impact of an interprofessional training ward on the development of interprofessional competencies: study protocol of a longitudinal mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ 2019; 19:48. [PMID: 30732614 PMCID: PMC6367825 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1478-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To meet the patients' needs and to provide adequate health care, students need to be prepared for interprofessional collaborative practice during their undergraduate education. On interprofessional training wards (IPTW) undergraduates of various health care professions potentially develop a mutual understanding and improve their interprofessional competencies in clinical practice. To enhance collaboration of 6th-year medical students and nursing trainees in the third year of their vocational training an IPTW (Heidelberger Interprofessionelle Ausbildungsstation - HIPSTA) was implemented at the University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. On HIPSTA future physicians and nurses take care of the patients self responsibly and in close interprofessional collaboration, supervised by facilitators of both professions. Although there are positive experiences with IPTWs internationally, little is known about the impact of IPTW on the acquisition of interprofessional competencies. For future interprofessional training and implementation of IPTWs evaluation of interprofessional learning and collaborative practice on Germany's first IPTW is of high relevance. METHODS To evaluate the acquisition of interprofessional competencies the study follows a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data is collected from undergraduate participants, staff participants and facilitators on HIPSTA (intervention group) and undergraduate participants and staff participants on a comparable 'conventional' ward without special interprofessional training (comparison group) immediately pre and post HIPSTA and, as follow-up, after three to six months (T0, T1, T2), using three questionnaires, namely the University of the West of England Interprofessional Questionnaire (UWE-IP), the Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (ISVS) and the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS). Qualitative data is gathered in form of interviews and focus groups based on semi structured guidelines, video recordings of handovers and overt non-participant observations of daily rounds. Quantitative data will be analysed in a longitudinal comparison, presented descriptively and tested with an analysis of variance. Qualitative data will be analysed deductively and inductively. DISCUSSION The results of the evaluation will give insight in undergraduates', staff's and facilitators' experiences and their self-perception of competency development. In addition the results will help identify benefits, challenges and areas for modification when implementing and establishing similar interprofessional training wards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Mink
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anika Mitzkat
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L. Mihaljevic
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Götsch
- Academy of Health Professions Heidelberg, Nursing School, Wieblinger Weg 19, D-69123 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jochen Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Krug
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mahler
- Department of Nursing Science, University Tübingen, Geissweg 5/1, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Heger P, Blank S, Gooßen K, Nienhüser H, Diener MK, Ulrich A, Mihaljevic AL, Schmidt T. Thoracoabdominal versus transhiatal surgical approaches for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:103-113. [PMID: 30607534 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-018-1745-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes of transhiatally extended gastrectomy (TEG) and thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) for therapy of adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) with focus on AEG type II, as the optimal approach for these tumors is still unclear. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) were searched until July 24, 2018. Studies comparing TAE and TEG for surgical treatment of AEG type tumors have been included. Patient's baseline and perioperative data have been extracted and meta-analyses have been conducted for the outcomes: number of dissected lymph nodes, R0-resection rate, anastomotic leak rate, postoperative morbidity, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS Of 6709 articles identified, 8 studies have been included for further analysis. One thousand thirty-four patients underwent TAE, and 1177 patients TEG. No differences were found between the approaches in regard to number of dissected lymph nodes (MD - 0.96; 95% CI - 3.07 to 1.15; p = 0.37), R0-resection rates (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.57 to 1.63; p = 0.90), anastomotic leak rates (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.86; p = 0.63), and 30-day mortality (OR 1.53; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.61; p = 0.11). However, a higher rate of postoperative morbidity was found after TAE (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.14; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS The optimal approach to surgical therapy of AEG II still remains unclear. This study identified a significantly higher rate of postoperative morbidity after TAE at comparable surgical outcomes. Due to major limitations concerning the quality of included studies, current data strongly mandates a properly designed randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal surgical approach for AEG type II tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Blank
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Käthe Gooßen
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Henrik Nienhüser
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexis Ulrich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fink CA, Friedrich M, Frey PE, Rädeker L, Leuck A, Bruckner T, Feisst M, Tenckhoff S, Klose C, Dörr-Harim C, Neudecker J, Mihaljevic AL. Prospective multicentre cohort study of patient-reported outcomes and complications following major abdominal neoplastic surgery (PATRONUS) - study protocol for a CHIR-Net student-initiated German medical audit study (CHIR-Net SIGMA study). BMC Surg 2018; 18:90. [PMID: 30373596 PMCID: PMC6206710 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-018-0422-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the most important aspects of designing a clinical trial is selecting appropriate outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can provide a personal assessment of the burden and impact of a malignant disease and its treatment. PROs comprise a wide range of outcomes including basic clinical symptom scores and complex metrics such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There is limited data on how postoperative complications following cancer surgery affect symptoms and HRQoL. For this reason the primary aim of the PATRONUS study is to investigate how perioperative complications affect cancer-related symptoms and HRQoL in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery. The PATRONUS study is designed and will be initiated and conducted by medical students under the direct supervision of clinician scientists based on the concept of inquiry-based learning. METHODS PATRONUS is a non-interventional prospective multicentre cohort study. Patients undergoing elective oncological abdominal surgery will be recruited at regional centres of the clinical network of the German Surgical Society (CHIR-Net) and associated hospitals. A core set of 12 cancer associated symptoms will be assessed via the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The cancer-specific HRQoL will be measured via the computerised adaptive testing version of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30. PROs will be measured eight times over a period of six months. The short-term clinical outcome measure is the rate of postoperative complications (grade II to V) within 30 days according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The long-term clinical outcome is overall survival within six months postoperative. DISCUSSION PATRONUS will provide essential insights into the patients' assessment of their well-being and quality of life in direct relation to clinical outcome parameters following abdominal cancer surgery. Furthermore, PATRONUS will investigate the feasibility of multicentre student-led clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00013035 (registered on October 26, 2017). Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1202-8863.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph A. Fink
- University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mirco Friedrich
- University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pia-Elena Frey
- University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Rädeker
- University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Leuck
- University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine, Im Neuenheimer Feld 346, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feisst
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Solveig Tenckhoff
- CHIR-Net Coordination Centre at the Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Klose
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Colette Dörr-Harim
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Neudecker
- Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - André L. Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|