How we can improve the appropriateness of ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy: the lesson of the COVID-19 outbreak

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has significantly modified hospital and outpatient activities.

AIMS

To assess the pandemic's impact on the appropriateness of outpatient gastrointestinal (G.I.) endoscopy in a southern Italy Region.

METHODS

Between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2022, we compared the number, the type of activities, and the appropriateness of the G.I. endoscopy procedures in the four territorial gastroenterology and digestive endoscopy services of the Apulia region.

RESULTS

In 2019, 11 173 outpatient procedures were provided, which dropped by about 44% (P < 0.05) during 2020. The endoscopic activity was slightly reduced during 2020 (-18.77%), while every other activity dropped significantly. During 2021-2022, the overall activities slightly increased but remained below the number of activities provided before the pandemic (P < 0.05). However, the endoscopic activity increased by +6.86% from 2019 to 2022, mainly due to more colonoscopies. During the 4 years analysed, the overall appropriateness rate of the endoscopic examinations increased during 2020 (2019: 67%; 2020: 81%) while dropping again in the following years (2021: 75%; 2022; 69%).

CONCLUSION

The appropriateness of the G.I. endoscopic procedures in the territorial gastroenterology services in the Apulia Region has improved during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, dropping again in the following years. Overall, the appropriateness of endoscopic procedures remains suboptimal; thus, educational activities are needed to improve the appropriateness rate to optimise the limited resources.

Influenza Vaccination and Health Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Several measures aimed at containing the spread of this virus have been recommended by international and nation public health institutions, but whether the influenza vaccine, while not protective against COVID-19, nonetheless reduces disease severity is unclear. This study evaluated the potential role of influenza vaccine in reducing the rate of hospitalization and death in COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 cases recorded in the province of Brindisi (Apulia, Southern Italy) during the first pandemic wave (February-May 2020) and occurring in patients vaccinated with the influenza vaccine during the 2019-2020 influenza season were considered. From February 2020 to May 2020, 3872 inhabitants of the province of Brindisi underwent SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing and 664 (8.7%) tested positive. A multivariate analysis showed that among COVID-19 patients neither hospitalization nor death was significantly associated with influenza vaccination (p > 0.05), whereas within this group male sex, older age, and chronic diseases were identified as risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Our study did not show an association between the influenza vaccine and complications of COVID-19. Nonetheless, influenza vaccination must be promoted as a central public health measure, because by reducing the burden on hospitals it can greatly benefit the management of COVID-19 patients.

Low-dose balsalazide plus a high-potency probiotic preparation is more effective than balsalazide alone or mesalazine in the treatment of acute mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Balsalazide is well tolerated and effective in treating acute ulcerative colitis. VSL#3 is a probiotic cocktail proven to be effective in preventing flare-ups of chronic pouchitis. We compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose balsalazide (2.25 g/day) plus 3 g/day VLS#3 (group A) with medium-dose balsalazide alone (group B) and with mesalazine (group C) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate active ulcerative colitis.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Ninety patients (30 per group) were randomly enrolled, with a treatment duration of 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by symptoms assessment, endoscopic appearance, and histological evaluation.

RESULTS

Balsalazide/VSL#3 was significantly superior to balsalazide alone and to mesalazine in obtaining remission: 24 patients of group A were in remission [per-protocol: 85.71% (C.I.95%: 62-96), on intention-to-treat: 80% (C.I.95%: 59-91)], while 21 group B [per-protocol: 80.77% (C.I. 95%: 51-82), on intention-to-treat: 77% (C.I.95%: 43-81)] and 16 group C patients [per-protocol: 72.73% (C.I. 95%: 30-75), on intention-to-treat: 53.33% (C.I.95%: 42-62)] were in remission (p<0.02). Balsalazide with or without VSL#3 was better tolerated than mesalazine: two group C patients were withdrawn from the study because of severe side-effects; 1 group A (3.33%), 3 group B (10%) and 4 group C (13.33%) patients experienced slight side-effects. The balsalazide/VSL#3 combination was faster in obtaining remission than balsalazide alone or mesalazine (4, 7.5, and 13 days in groups A, B and C, respectively) and also better in improving all parameters evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Balsalazide/VSL#3 may be a very good choice in the treatment of active mild-to-moderate active ulcerative colitis instead of balsalazide alone or mesalazine.

Endoscopic features of celiac disease in adults and their correlation with age, histological damage, and clinical form of the disease

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Although earlier studies have focused on endoscopic markers as predictors of celiac disease, there are still no certainties about the value of these markers. The aim of this study was to consider first, specific endoscopic features as predictors of specific histological damage; secondly, whether there is an association between the endoscopic features of celiac disease and the age of patients at the time of diagnosis; and thirdly, whether particular endoscopic features of celiac disease are associated with the clinical form of the disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied the endoscopic features of celiac disease in 144 consecutive adult patients (52 had the classical form of the disease, 64 the subclinical and 28 the silent form). The histopathological findings were expressed according to the Marsh classification.

RESULTS

Slight/mild damage seen at endoscopy was associated with a Marsh II-IIIa grading (P < 0.005), while severe endoscopic damage was related to a Marsh IIIb-IIIc grading (P < 0.0005). Younger patients showed slighter damage at endoscopy (P < 0.001), while older patients showed more severe damage (P < 0.005). Finally, the classical form of celiac disease showed more severe damage at endoscopy, while the subclinical/silent forms of celiac disease showed slighter damage endoscopically (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the endoscopic appearance of the duodenum may be predictive of histological damage grading. Moreover, we showed that in young patients with subclinical/silent celiac disease there is a greater probability of finding slight/mild endoscopic abnormalities associated with slight/mild histological damage.

Efficacy and tolerability of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus amoxycillin and clarithromycin as first- or second-line therapy to cure Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Ranitidine bismuth citrate has recently been introduced for the treatment of H. pylori infection and obtains good eradication rates; however, eradication failures still appear in a considerable proportion of cases. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus amoxycillin and clarithromycin as first- or second-line therapy to cure H. pylori infection.

METHODOLOGY

We studied 423 consecutive H. pylori-positive patients. In 210 consecutive patients H. pylori infection was diagnosed for the first time (group A), while 213 consecutive patients were enrolled after failure of a first attempt to eradicate H. pylori (group B). All patients received ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and amoxycillin 1 g b.d. for seven days. H. pylori-status was evaluated by means of histology and rapid urease test at entry and by 13C-urea breath test in all patients one month after treatment.

RESULTS

410/423 patients completed the study (202/210 in group A and 208/213 in group B). Two patients of group A and 1 patient of group B were withdrawn from the study due to poor compliance, 6 group A patients and 4 group B patients were lost to follow-up. In group A, after the end of treatment, 181/202 patients were H. pylori-negative (per-protocol analysis: 89.60% [C.I. 95%: 82-95%]; on intention-to-treat analysis: 86.19% [C.I. 95%; 76-92%]), side-effects occurred in 29 patients (13.80%); they were severe in 2 patients and the patients were withdrawn from the study. In group B, after the end of treatment, 200/208 patients were H. pylori-negative (per-protocol analysis: 95.15% [C.I. 95%; 92-100%], on intention-to-treat analysis: 93.89% [C.I. 95%; 89-98%), side-effects occurred in 11 patients (5.13%); they were slight or mild and did not require discontinuation of the treatment. The results of group B were statistically better than group A, both in eradication rate (P < 0.01) as well as both side-effects provoked (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ranitidine bismuth citrate-clarithromycin-amoxycillin is more effective when used as second-line therapy rather than when used as first-line therapy; second, ranitidine bismuth citrate-clarithromycin-amoxycillin shows lower and slighter side-effects when used as second-line therapy rather than when used as first-line therapy; finally, the excellent tolerability of ranitidine bismuth citrate + clarithromycin + amoxycillin influences positively the patients' compliance, both as first- and second-line therapy.

Low prevalence of antigliadin and anti-endomysium antibodies in subclinical/silent celiac disease

OBJECTIVE

Endomysial antibodies (EMA) are a well-known hallmark of celiac disease, but some recent studies showed that the prevalence of these antibodies in clinical practice is lower than expected. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of antigliadin (AGA) and EMA antibodies on a consecutive series of subclinical/silent celiac patients.

METHODS

We studied 115 consecutive patients with subclinical (92 patients) or silent (23 patients) forms of celiac disease. AGA and EMA were screened in all patients. Histopathology of celiac disease was expressed according to the Marsh classification.

RESULTS

The overall AGA in subclinical form were positive in 77% (14 of 18) of patients with partial villous atrophy (VA), in 84% (21 of 25) of patients with subtotal VA, and in 90% (27 of 30) of patients with total VA, whereas EMA were positive in 88.88% (16 of 18) of patients with partial VA, in 92% (23 of 25) of patients with subtotal VA, and 96.66% (29 of 30) of patients with total VA. On the other hand, AGA were positive in 0% (zero of two) of patients with Marsh I and in 30% (three of 10) of patients with Marsh II, whereas EMA were positive in 0% (zero of two) of patients with Marsh I and in 40% (four of 10) of patients with Marsh II (Marsh I-IIIa vs Marsh IIIb-c, p = < 0.005 in overall AGA-positive patients and p = < 0.0001 in EMA-positive patients). At the same time the overall AGA in silent form were positive in 60% (three of five) of patients with partial VA, in 66.66% (four of six) of patients with subtotal VA, and in 77.77% (seven of nine) of patients with total VA, whereas EMA were positive in 80% (four of five) of patients with partial VA, in 83.33% (five of six) of patients with subtotal VA, and in 88.88% (eight of nine) of patients with total VA. On the other hand, overall AGA were positive in 0% of patients with both Marsh I (zero of one) and Marsh II (zero of two), as well as EMA were positive in 0% with both Marsh I (zero of one) and Marsh II (zero of two) (Marsh I-IIIa vs Marsh IIIb-c, p = < 0.001 in overall AGA-positive patients and p = < 0.007 in EMA-positive patients).

CONCLUSIONS

At this time small bowel biopsy seems to be the only correct procedure to diagnose a case of suspected celiac disease, especially in patients with mild symptoms or suspected for celiac disease, because they belong to high-risk groups.