Rejection-identification and increased use of geosocial networking apps to meet male sexual partners among Black men who have sex with men

Objective: The use of geosocial networking (GSN) apps to meet male sexual partners may contribute to HIV infection risk for Black men who have sex with men (MSM), but the psychosocial underpinnings of this behavior are not understood. In social psychology, the Rejection-Identification Model posits that identification with a socially stigmatized group emerges as a means of coping in response to perceived stigmatization-which can shape behavior. This study tested the Rejection-Identification process as a facilitator of increased use of GSN apps to meet male sexual partners among Black MSM who use these apps. Method: Black MSM (N = 103; M_age = 29.8) reporting a male sexual partner from a GSN app in the past year were recruited nationally from Grindr and Facebook. Participants completed an online survey in which they reported sociodemographic information, measures of racial stigma and Black identity, and characteristics of their past-year male sexual partners. Results: Participants in this sample reported that most of their past-year male partners came from GSN apps (M_percent = 82.3), and results from hypothesis testing showed that greater perceived devaluation of Black people in society (i.e., public racial stigma) was associated with an increased percentage of GSN-met partners. In line with the Rejection-Identification Model, this relationship was mediated by greater Black identity centrality. Conclusions: Findings highlight psychosocial correlates of increased GSN app use to meet male sexual partners among Black MSM, which may place Black MSM at increased risk for HIV infection. Results also point to the possibility that these factors may be harnessed to develop HIV prevention strategies for Black MSM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Examining Stigmatizing Beliefs about PrEP Use among Black Sexual Minority Men: A Test of Explanatory Mechanisms

Stigma often is cited as a barrier to the uptake and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV among Black sexual minority men (SMM). Socialized gender norms (i.e., restrictive emotionality) are associated with experiences and manifestations of stigma in men. However, the association between restrictive emotionality and the stigma surrounding PrEP use has received little attention in previous research. The present study examines the association between restrictive emotionality and holding stigmatizing beliefs about PrEP use with a theoretically informed serial mediation model testing internalized homophobia and LGBT community connectedness as mediators among a sample of 455 Black SMM in the Southeastern US. Results indicate that restrictive emotionality is associated with stigmatizing beliefs about PrEP use. Further, internalized homophobia and LGBT community connectedness were found to partially mediate the proposed relationship serially. Internalized homophobia, but not LGBT community connectedness, also independently mediated the association between restrictive emotionality and stigmatizing beliefs of PrEP use. This study provides important insights into how aspects of masculinity influence the manifestation of stigmatizing beliefs about PrEP use among Black SMM. The present findings have implications for reducing these beliefs, which are known to negatively impact uptake and use of the HIV prevention tool among Black SMM at elevated risk for HIV.

A New Era of HIV Risk: It's Not What You Know, It's Who You Know (and How Infectious)

HIV is transmitted in social and sexual relationships, and HIV transmission risks, as well as protective actions, are evolving as HIV epidemics unfold. The current focus of HIV prevention is centered on antiretroviral medications used to reduce HIV infectiousness in persons already infected with HIV [treatment as prevention (TasP)]. The same medications used to treat infected persons can also be used by uninfected persons as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to reduce the infectivity of HIV. Both PrEP and TasP are effective when adherence is high and individuals do not have co-occurring sexually transmitted infections. HIV prevention is most effective and efficient when delivered within sexual networks with high HIV prevalence. Specific network characteristics are recognized as important facilitators of HIV transmission; these characteristics include the degree of similarity among network members (homophily), gender role norms, and belief systems. Since 2011, HIV risk has been redefined based on infectiousness and infectivity, ushering in a new era of HIV prevention with the potential to end HIV epidemics.

Linguistic correlates of the Communication Patterns Questionnaire: The correspondence of language and quantitative measures of perceived communication patterns among emerging adult gay male couples

Up to two-thirds of new HIV infections among sexual minority men are estimated to occur within main partnerships, with the greatest burden among younger partners ages 18 to 29. Various interpersonal processes, such as perceived communication patterns, influence HIV behavioral health among these couples. Although they represent correlates of health for gay couples, it is unclear how these abstract dynamics manifest in the context of everyday speech. The present study investigated linguistic predictors of perceived communication patterns among partnered gay men. Individual interviews from both members of 21 emerging adult couples were analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry Word Count. Couples' total first-person singular (I-talk) and plural (We-talk) pronoun use were positively associated with total dyadic constructive communication scores. Negative emotion word use was negatively associated with constructive communication scores. Results suggest that language use provides important markers of interpersonal processes that predict HIV behavioral health among gay couples, suggesting the potential of language use to inform HIV prevention interventions for partnered gay men in emerging adult couples.