1
|
Parsons HA, Blewett T, Chu X, Sridhar S, Santos K, Xiong K, Abramson VG, Patel A, Cheng J, Brufsky A, Rhoades J, Force J, Liu R, Traina TA, Carey LA, Rimawi MF, Miller KD, Stearns V, Specht J, Falkson C, Burstein HJ, Wolff AC, Winer EP, Tayob N, Krop IE, Makrigiorgos GM, Golub TR, Mayer EL, Adalsteinsson VA. Circulating tumor DNA association with residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer in TBCRC 030. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:899-906. [PMID: 37597579 PMCID: PMC10898256 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to examine circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and its association with residual cancer burden (RCB) using an ultrasensitive assay in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified responders (RCB 0/1) and matched non-responders (RCB 2/3) from the phase II TBCRC 030 prospective study of neoadjuvant paclitaxel versus cisplatin in TNBC. We collected plasma samples at baseline, 3 weeks and 12 weeks (end of therapy). We created personalized ctDNA assays utilizing MAESTRO mutation enrichment sequencing. We explored associations between ctDNA and RCB status and disease recurrence. RESULTS Of 139 patients, 68 had complete samples and no additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-two were responders and 19 of those had sufficient tissue for whole-genome sequencing. We identified an additional 19 non-responders for a matched case-control analysis of 38 patients using a MAESTRO ctDNA assay tracking 319-1000 variants (median 1000 variants) to 114 plasma samples from 3 timepoints. Overall, ctDNA positivity was 100% at baseline, 79% at week 3 and 55% at week 12. Median tumor fraction (TFx) was 3.7 × 10-4 (range 7.9 × 10-7-4.9 × 10-1). TFx decreased 285-fold from baseline to week 3 in responders and 24-fold in non-responders. Week 12 ctDNA clearance correlated with RCB: clearance was observed in 10 of 11 patients with RCB 0, 3 of 8 with RCB 1, 4 of 15 with RCB 2 and 0 of 4 with RCB 3. Among six patients with known recurrence, five had persistent ctDNA at week 12. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for TNBC reduced ctDNA TFx by 285-fold in responders and 24-fold in non-responders. In 58% (22/38) of patients, ctDNA TFx dropped below the detection level of a commercially available test, emphasizing the need for sensitive tests. Additional studies will determine whether ctDNA-guided approaches can improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H A Parsons
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston.
| | - T Blewett
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge
| | - X Chu
- Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - S Sridhar
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge
| | - K Santos
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - K Xiong
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge
| | | | - A Patel
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - J Cheng
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge
| | - A Brufsky
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh
| | - J Rhoades
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge
| | | | - R Liu
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge
| | - T A Traina
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - L A Carey
- The University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill
| | - M F Rimawi
- Baylor College of Medicine Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Houston
| | - K D Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis
| | - V Stearns
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - J Specht
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle
| | - C Falkson
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - H J Burstein
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - A C Wolff
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - E P Winer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - N Tayob
- Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - I E Krop
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | | | - T R Golub
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge
| | - E L Mayer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Villacampa G, Tung NM, Pernas S, Paré L, Bueno-Muiño C, Echavarría I, López-Tarruella S, Roche-Molina M, Del Monte-Millán M, Marín-Aguilera M, Brasó-Maristany F, Waks AG, Pascual T, Martínez-Sáez O, Vivancos A, Conte PF, Guarneri V, Vittoria Dieci M, Griguolo G, Cortés J, Llombart-Cussac A, Muñoz M, Vidal M, Adamo B, Wolff AC, DeMichele A, Villagrasa P, Parker JS, Perou CM, Fernandez-Martinez A, Carey LA, Mittendorf EA, Martín M, Prat A, Tolaney SM. Association of HER2DX with pathological complete response and survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:783-795. [PMID: 37302750 PMCID: PMC10735273 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The HER2DX genomic test predicts pathological complete response (pCR) and survival outcome in early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Here, we evaluated the association of HER2DX scores with (i) pCR according to hormone receptor status and various treatment regimens, and (ii) survival outcome according to pCR status. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven neoadjuvant cohorts with HER2DX and clinical individual patient data were evaluated (DAPHNe, GOM-HGUGM-2018-05, CALGB-40601, ISPY-2, BiOnHER, NEOHER and PAMELA). All patients were treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab (n = 765) in combination with pertuzumab (n = 328), lapatinib (n = 187) or without a second anti-HER2 drug (n = 250). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were available in a combined series of 268 patients (i.e. NEOHER and PAMELA) with a pCR (n = 118) and without a pCR (n = 150). Cox models were adjusted to evaluate whether HER2DX can identify patients with low or high risk beyond pCR status. RESULTS HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR in all patients [odds ratio (OR) per 10-unit increase = 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.43-1.77; area under the ROC curve = 0.75], with or without dual HER2 blockade. A statistically significant increase in pCR rate due to dual HER2 blockade over trastuzumab-only was observed in HER2DX pCR-high tumors treated with chemotherapy (OR = 2.36 (1.09-5.42). A statistically significant increase in pCR rate due to multi-agent chemotherapy over a single taxane was observed in HER2DX pCR-medium tumors treated with dual HER2 blockade (OR = 3.11, 1.54-6.49). The pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-low tumors were ≤30.0% regardless of treatment administered. After adjusting by pCR status, patients identified as HER2DX low-risk had better EFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P = 0.006) compared with patients with HER2DX high-risk. CONCLUSIONS HER2DX pCR score and risk score might help identify ideal candidates to receive neoadjuvant dual HER2 blockade in combination with a single taxane in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Villacampa
- SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Group, Barcelona; Oncology Data Science, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - S Pernas
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona
| | - L Paré
- Reveal Genomics, Barcelona
| | - C Bueno-Muiño
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Infanta Cristina (Parla), Fundación de Investigación Biomédica del H.U. Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid
| | - I Echavarría
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CiberOnc, Madrid
| | - S López-Tarruella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CiberOnc, Madrid
| | - M Roche-Molina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CiberOnc, Madrid
| | - M Del Monte-Millán
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CiberOnc, Madrid
| | | | - F Brasó-Maristany
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A G Waks
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - T Pascual
- SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Group, Barcelona; Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - O Martínez-Sáez
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Vivancos
- Cancer Genomics Group, VHIO, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P F Conte
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - V Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - M Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - G Griguolo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - J Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center, Pangaea Oncology, Quirónsalud Group, Barcelona
| | - A Llombart-Cussac
- Arnau de Vilanova Hospital, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Muñoz
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Vidal
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Adamo
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A C Wolff
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore
| | - A DeMichele
- Department of Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | - J S Parker
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - C M Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - A Fernandez-Martinez
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - L A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | - E A Mittendorf
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - M Martín
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CiberOnc, Madrid
| | - A Prat
- Reveal Genomics, Barcelona; Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology (IOB)-Quirón, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - S M Tolaney
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston; Institute of Oncology (IOB)-Quirón, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tarantino P, Viale G, Press MF, Hu X, Penault-Llorca F, Bardia A, Batistatou A, Burstein HJ, Carey LA, Cortes J, Denkert C, Diéras V, Jacot W, Koutras AK, Lebeau A, Loibl S, Modi S, Mosele MF, Provenzano E, Pruneri G, Reis-Filho JS, Rojo F, Salgado R, Schmid P, Schnitt SJ, Tolaney SM, Trapani D, Vincent-Salomon A, Wolff AC, Pentheroudakis G, André F, Curigliano G. ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:645-659. [PMID: 37269905 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has recently emerged as a targetable subset of breast tumors, based on the evidence from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. This evolution has raised several biological and clinical questions, warranting the establishment of consensus to optimally treat patients with HER2-low breast tumors. Between 2022 and 2023, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process focused on HER2-low breast cancer. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of breast cancer from nine different countries. The aim of the consensus was to develop statements on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) biology of HER2-low breast cancer; (ii) pathologic diagnosis of HER2-low breast cancer; (iii) clinical management of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer; and (iv) clinical trial design for HER2-low breast cancer. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. A review of the relevant scientific literature was conducted in advance. Consensus statements were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This article presents the developed statements, including findings from the expert panel discussions, expert opinion, and a summary of evidence supporting each statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Tarantino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan
| | - G Viale
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M F Press
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - X Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Centre Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Bardia
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - A Batistatou
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - L A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - V Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes
| | - W Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - A K Koutras
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
| | - A Lebeau
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group/GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - S Modi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M F Mosele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - E Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust and NIH Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - G Pruneri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - J S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - F Rojo
- Department of Pathology, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital-CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Salgado
- Department of Pathology, ZAS, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P Schmid
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - S J Schnitt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - S M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Pathology, Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine Division, Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - A C Wolff
- The Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - F André
- INSERM U981 - Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, PRISM Center for Precision Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kwon JY, Moynihan M, Lau F, Wolff AC, Torrejon MJ, Irlbacher G, Hung L, Lambert L, Sawatzky R. Seeing the person before the numbers: Personas for understanding patients' life stories when using patient-reported outcome measures in practice settings. Int J Med Inform 2023; 172:105016. [PMID: 36758303 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
AIMS While patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being integrated into health information technologies, one challenge has been to assist clinicians in understanding how the responses to PROMs relate to patient stories for identifying and addressing the care needs of individual patients. Personas, hypothetical representations of patients, can be used as an innovative strategy to support clinicians' use of PROMs in their practice. These personas embody patients' life stories, making them a valuable tool for understanding the person when using PROMs. The aim of this project focused on cancer-related experiences to develop personas as a knowledge translation strategy to support clinicians' use of PROMs for person-centred cancer care. METHODS Eight older adults participated in online workshops (n = 2-3 participants/workshop; 1.5-hour sessions) to co-develop personas that reflected their collective experiences at a particular stage of their cancer journeys. Participants were asked to identify themes that focused on what the personas were thinking and feeling, what influenced how the personas acted, and the personas' overall goals. Participants subsequently completed an emotional well-being PROM from the perspective of the persona. Personas were further refined based on key themes identified during the workshop discussions. RESULTS Four personas representing the cumulative experiences of the workshop participants were developed to help clinicians link PROM responses to patient stories. These personas became the basis of four practice scenarios, which were examples of interactions between a clinician and each persona, to demonstrate the use of PROMs in practice. CONCLUSION Personas can be used to illustrate patients' life stories and contextualize PROMs data. As a knowledge translation strategy, personas can foster clinician awareness of how responses to PROMs can be used to initiate conversations to better understand patients' unique life situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Yung Kwon
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada; Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, Victoria, Canada.
| | - Melissa Moynihan
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada; School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Francis Lau
- School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
| | - Angela C Wolff
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, Canada
| | - Maria-Jose Torrejon
- Nursing and Allied Health Research and Knowledge Translation, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Lillian Hung
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Canada; School of Nursing, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Leah Lambert
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Canada; Nursing and Allied Health Research and Knowledge Translation, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Richard Sawatzky
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Howard AF, Lynch K, Thorne S, Porcino A, Lambert L, De Vera MA, Wolff AC, Hedges P, Beck SM, Torrejón MJ, Kelly MT, McKenzie M. Occupational and Financial Setbacks in Caregivers of People with Colorectal Cancer: Considerations for Caregiver-Reported Outcomes. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:8180-8196. [PMID: 36354706 PMCID: PMC9689650 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29110646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Family caregivers of patients with cancer provide substantial physical, emotional, and functional care throughout the cancer trajectory. While caregiving can create employment and financial challenges, there is insufficient evidence to inform the development of caregiver-reported outcomes (CROs) that assess these experiences. The study purpose was to describe the occupational and financial consequences that were important to family caregivers of a patient with colorectal cancer (CRC) in the context of public health care, which represent potential considerations for CROs. In this qualitative Interpretive Description study, we analyzed interview data from 78 participants (25 caregivers, 37 patients, and 16 healthcare providers). Our findings point to temporary and long-term occupational and financial setbacks in the context of CRC. Caregiving for a person with CRC involved managing occupational implications, including (1) revamping employment arrangements, and (2) juggling work, family, and household demands. Caregiver financial struggles included (1) responding to financial demands at various stages of life, and (2) facing the spectre of lifelong expenses. Study findings offer novel insight into the cancer-related occupational and financial challenges facing caregivers, despite government-funded universal health care. Further research is warranted to develop CRO measures that assess the multifaceted nature of these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Fuchsia Howard
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
- Correspondence:
| | - Kelsey Lynch
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Sally Thorne
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
| | | | - Leah Lambert
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4C2 Canada
| | - Mary A. De Vera
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Angela C. Wolff
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1, Canada
| | | | - Scott M. Beck
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4C2 Canada
| | | | - Mary T. Kelly
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Michael McKenzie
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4C2 Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Howard AF, Torrejón MJ, Lynch K, Beck SM, Thorne S, Lambert L, Porcino A, De Vera MA, Davies JM, Avery J, Wolff AC, McDonald M, Lee JWK, Hedges P, Kelly MT, McKenzie M. To share or not to share: communication of caregiver-reported outcomes when a patient has colorectal cancer. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:13. [PMID: 35122565 PMCID: PMC8817655 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00418-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of patient-centered measurement in cancer care has led to recognition of the potential for caregiver-reported outcomes to improve caregiver, patient and healthcare system outcomes. Yet, there is limited evidence to inform caregiver-reported outcome implementation. Our purpose was to generate evidence to inform the meaningful and constructive integration of caregiver-reported outcomes into cancer care to benefit caregivers, including exploration of the question of the extent to which these assessments should be shared with patients. We focused on caregivers of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) because CRC is common, and associated caregiving can be complex. RESULTS From our Interpretive Description analysis of qualitative interview data from 78 participants (25 caregivers, 37 patients, and 16 healthcare providers [HCPs]), we identified contrasting perspectives about the sharing of caregiver-reported outcome assessments with patients with CRC. Those who preferred open communication with both the patient and caregiver present considered this essential for supporting the caregiver. The participants who preferred private communication without the patient, cited concern about caregiver- and patient-burden and guilt. Recognizing these perspectives, HCPs described strategies used to navigate sensitivities inherent in preferences for open versus private communication. CONCLUSIONS The integration of caregiver-reported outcomes into cancer care will require careful consideration of caregiver and patient preferences regarding the communication of caregiver assessments to prevent additional burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fuchsia Howard
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, , Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
| | | | - Kelsey Lynch
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, , Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Scott M Beck
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, , Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4C2, Canada
| | - Sally Thorne
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, , Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Leah Lambert
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, , Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4C2, Canada
| | | | - Mary A De Vera
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Janine M Davies
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4C2, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Jonathan Avery
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, , Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Angela C Wolff
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC, V2Y 1Y1, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Mary T Kelly
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, , Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
| | - Michael McKenzie
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4C2, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schick-Makaroff K, Sawatzky R, Cuthbertson L, Öhlén J, Beemer A, Duquette D, Karimi-Dehkordi M, Stajduhar KI, Suryaprakash N, Terblanche L, Wolff AC, Cohen SR. Knowledge translation resources to support the use of quality of life assessment tools for the care of older adults living at home and their family caregivers. Qual Life Res 2021; 31:1727-1747. [PMID: 34664161 PMCID: PMC9098582 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03011-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To support the use of quality of life (QOL) assessment tools for older adults, we developed knowledge translation (KT) resources tailored for four audiences: (1) older adults and their family caregivers (micro), (2) healthcare providers (micro), (3) healthcare managers and leaders (meso), and (4) government leaders and decision-makers (macro). Our objectives were to (1) describe knowledge gaps and resources and (2) develop corresponding tailored KT resources to support use of QOL assessment tools by each of the micro-, meso-, and macro-audiences. Methods Data were collected in two phases through semi-structured interviews/focus groups with the four audiences in Canada. Data were analyzed using qualitative description analysis. KT resources were iteratively refined through formative evaluation. Results Older adults and family caregivers (N = 12) wanted basic knowledge about what “QOL assessment” meant and how it could improve their care. Healthcare providers (N = 13) needed practical solutions on how to integrate QOL assessment tools in their practice. Healthcare managers and leaders (N = 14) desired information about using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in healthcare programs and quality improvement. Government leaders and decision-makers (N = 11) needed to know how to access, use, and interpret PROM and PREM information for decision-making purposes. Based on these insights and evidence-based sources, we developed KT resources to introduce QOL assessment through 8 infographic brochures, 1 whiteboard animation, 1 live-action video, and a webpage. Conclusion Our study affirms the need to tailor KT resources on QOL assessment for different audiences. Our KT resources are available: www.healthyqol.com/older-adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara Schick-Makaroff
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, 4-116 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Richard Sawatzky
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, BC, V2Y 1Y1, Canada. .,Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, 588- 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, Canada. .,Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 3, Box 400, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Lena Cuthbertson
- Office of Patient Centred Measurement, British Columbia, Ministry of Health, 1190 Hornby Street, 341F, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2K5, Canada
| | - Joakim Öhlén
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, and Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 400, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Palliative Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Västra Götaland Region, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Autumn Beemer
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Dominique Duquette
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 1-198 Clinical Sciences Building, 11350 - 83Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P4, Canada
| | - Kelli I Stajduhar
- School of Nursing, Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, STN CSC, PO Box 1700, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada
| | - Nitya Suryaprakash
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, University of British Columbia, 7th Floor, 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Landa Terblanche
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, BC, V2Y 1Y1, Canada
| | - Angela C Wolff
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, BC, V2Y 1Y1, Canada
| | - S Robin Cohen
- Departments of Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H4A 3T2, Canada.,Lady Davis Research Institute of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wolff AC, Dresselhuis A, Hejazi S, Dixon D, Gibson D, Howard AF, Liva S, Astle B, Reimer-Kirkham S, Noonan VK, Edwards L. Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis. Syst Rev 2021; 10:169. [PMID: 34108024 PMCID: PMC8188663 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01725-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Substantial literature has highlighted the importance of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs, respectively) to collect clinically relevant information to better understand and address what matters to patients. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the evidence about how healthcare providers implement individual-level PROMs and PREMs data into daily practice. METHODS This mixed methods systematic review protocol describes the design of our synthesis of the peer-reviewed research evidence (i.e., qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods), systematic reviews, organizational implementation projects, expert opinion, and grey literature. Keyword synonyms for "PROMs," PREMs," and "implementation" will be used to search eight databases (i.e., MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Evidence-based Medicine Reviews, and ProQuest (Dissertation and Theses)) with limiters of English from 2009 onwards. Study selection criteria include implementation at the point-of-care by healthcare providers in any practice setting. Eligible studies will be critically appraised using validated tools (e.g., Joanna Briggs Institute). Guided by the review questions, data extraction and synthesis will occur simultaneously to identify biographical information and methodological characteristics as well as classify study findings related to implementation processes and strategies. As part of the narrative synthesis approach, two frameworks will be utilized: (a) Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify influential factors of PROMs and PREMs implementation and (b) Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) to illicit strategies. Data management will be undertaken using NVivo 12TM. DISCUSSION Data from PROMs and PREMs are critical to adopt a person-centered approach to healthcare. Findings from this review will guide subsequent phases of a larger project that includes interviews and a consensus-building forum with end users to create guidelines for implementing PROMs and PREMs at the point of care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020182904 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela C. Wolff
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, British Columbia V2Y 1Y1 Canada
| | - Andrea Dresselhuis
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, British Columbia V2Y 1Y1 Canada
| | - Samar Hejazi
- Department of Evaluation and Research Services, Fraser Health Authority, Suite 400, 13450 – 102nd Avenue, Surrey, BC V3T 0H1 Canada
| | - Duncan Dixon
- N.M. Alloway Library, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1 Canada
| | - Deborah Gibson
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, British Columbia V2Y 1Y1 Canada
| | - A. Fuchsia Howard
- Faculty of Applied Sciences, School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver Campus, T201 - 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5 Canada
| | - Sarah Liva
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, British Columbia V2Y 1Y1 Canada
| | - Barbara Astle
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, British Columbia V2Y 1Y1 Canada
| | - Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, British Columbia V2Y 1Y1 Canada
| | - Vanessa K. Noonan
- Research and Best Practice Implementation, Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, 818 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9 Canada
| | - Lisa Edwards
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD7 1DP UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mayer EL, Abramson V, Jankowitz R, Falkson C, Marcom PK, Traina T, Carey L, Rimawi M, Specht J, Miller K, Stearns V, Tung N, Perou C, Richardson AL, Componeschi K, Trippa L, Tan-Wasielewski Z, Timms K, Krop I, Wolff AC, Winer EP. TBCRC 030: a phase II study of preoperative cisplatin versus paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer: evaluating the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) biomarker. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1518-1525. [PMID: 32798689 PMCID: PMC8437015 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cisplatin and paclitaxel are active in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Despite different mechanisms of action, effective predictive biomarkers to preferentially inform drug selection have not been identified. The homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.) detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair and may identify patients with BRCA1/2-proficient tumors that are sensitive to DNA-targeting therapy. The primary objective of TBCRC 030 was to detect an association of HRD with pathologic response [residual cancer burden (RCB)-0/1] to single-agent cisplatin or paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective phase II study enrolled patients with germline BRCA1/2 wild-type/unknown stage I-III TNBC in a 12-week randomized study of preoperative cisplatin or paclitaxel. The HRD assay was carried out on baseline tissue; positive HRD was defined as a score ≥33. Crossover to an alternative chemotherapy was offered if there was inadequate response. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-nine patients were evaluable for response, including 88 (63.3%) who had surgery at 12 weeks and 51 (36.7%) who crossed over to an alternative provider-selected preoperative chemotherapy regimen due to inadequate clinical response. HRD results were available for 104 tumors (74.8%) and 74 (71.1%) were HRD positive. The RCB-0/1 rate was 26.4% with cisplatin and 22.3% with paclitaxel. No significant association was observed between HRD score and RCB response to either cisplatin [odds ratio (OR) for RCB-0/1 if HRD positive 2.22 (95% CI: 0.39-23.68)] or paclitaxel [OR for RCB-0/1 if HRD positive 0.90 (95% CI: 0.19-4.95)]. There was no evidence of an interaction between HRD and pathologic response to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective preoperative trial in TNBC, HRD was not predictive of pathologic response. Tumors were similarly responsive to preoperative paclitaxel or cisplatin chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E L Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
| | - V Abramson
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
| | - R Jankowitz
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - C Falkson
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| | - P K Marcom
- Duke University Cancer Institute, Durham, USA
| | - T Traina
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - L Carey
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - M Rimawi
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - J Specht
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, USA
| | - K Miller
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA
| | - V Stearns
- Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - N Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - C Perou
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - A L Richardson
- Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - L Trippa
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | | | - K Timms
- Myriad Genetics Inc., Salt Lake City, USA
| | - I Krop
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - A C Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | - E P Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Veeraraghavan J, De Angelis C, Mao R, Wang T, Herrera S, Pavlick AC, Contreras A, Nuciforo P, Mayer IA, Forero A, Nanda R, Goetz MP, Chang JC, Wolff AC, Krop IE, Fuqua SAW, Prat A, Hilsenbeck SG, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS, Gutierrez C, Osborne CK, Rimawi MF, Schiff R. A combinatorial biomarker predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant lapatinib and trastuzumab without chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:927-933. [PMID: 30903140 PMCID: PMC6594453 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND HER2-positive (+) breast cancers, defined by HER2 overexpression and/or amplification, are often addicted to HER2 to maintain their malignant phenotype. Yet, some HER2+ tumors do not benefit from anti-HER2 therapy. We hypothesize that HER2 amplification levels and PI3K pathway activation are key determinants of response to HER2-targeted treatments without chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Baseline HER2+ tumors from patients treated with neoadjuvant lapatinib plus trastuzumab [with endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor (ER)+ tumors] in TBCRC006 (NCT00548184) were evaluated in a central laboratory for HER2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (n = 56). HER2 copy number (CN) and FISH ratios, and PI3K pathway status, defined by PIK3CA mutations or PTEN levels by immunohistochemistry were available for 41 tumors. Results were correlated with pathologic complete response (pCR; no residual invasive tumor in breast). RESULTS Thirteen of the 56 patients (23%) achieved pCR. None of the 11 patients with HER2 ratio <4 and/or CN <10 achieved pCR, whereas 13/45 patients (29%) with HER2 ratio ≥4 and/or CN ≥10 attained pCR (P = 0.0513). Of the 18 patients with tumors expressing high PTEN or wild-type (WT) PIK3CA (intact PI3K pathway), 7 (39%) achieved pCR, compared with 1/23 (4%) with PI3K pathway alterations (P = 0.0133). Seven of the 16 patients (44%) with HER2 ratio ≥4 and intact PI3K pathway achieved pCR, whereas only 1/25 (4%) patients not meeting these criteria achieved pCR (P = 0.0031). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that there is a clinical subtype in breast cancer with high HER2 amplification and intact PI3K pathway that is especially sensitive to HER2-targeted therapies without chemotherapy. A combination of HER2 FISH ratio and PI3K pathway status warrants validation to identify patients who may be treated with HER2-targeted therapy without chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Veeraraghavan
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - C De Angelis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - R Mao
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - T Wang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine
| | - S Herrera
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - A C Pavlick
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - A Contreras
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - P Nuciforo
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I A Mayer
- Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
| | - A Forero
- Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - R Nanda
- Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago
| | - M P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester
| | - J C Chang
- Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston
| | - A C Wolff
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | - I E Krop
- Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - S A W Fuqua
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - A Prat
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S G Hilsenbeck
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine
| | - B Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - J S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - C Gutierrez
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - C K Osborne
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - M F Rimawi
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine
| | - R Schiff
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu Z, Sahli Z, Wang Y, Wolff AC, Cope L, Umbricht CB. Abstract P4-08-35: Young age at diagnosis is associated with worse prognosis in the luminal A breast cancer subtype. A retrospective institutional cohort study. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-08-35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BCA) presents with distinct molecular subtypes, each associated with different patterns of relapse, drug sensitivity, and prognosis. Although age at diagnosis is a recognized independent prognostic risk factor, its relative importance among molecular subtypes is not well documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of age at diagnosis among BCA patients of different immunohistochemical subtypes (LuminalA, LuminalB, Her2, Triple-negative).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of women with invasive BCA undergoing surgery at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from January 2000 - December 2016, excluding patients presenting with stage IV breast cancer. Patients were stratified into three age groups: ≤ 40, 41-60, and > 60 years, and multivariable analysis was performed using Cox regression. To explore age-related differences in gene expression, we identified differentially expressed genes (DEG) between age groups among BCA subtypes in the TCGA dataset. Finally, we identified key driver genes within DEG using a weighted gene co-expression network analysis.
Results: Our cohort included 3,524 patients with a median follow-up of 85.1 months. LuminalA breast cancer patients had significantly lower 5-year Disease Free Survival (DFS) and Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) in the ≤ 40 year age group compared to the 40-60 year age group (HR=2.69, 95%CI: 1.72 - 4.23 and HR=2.95, 95%CI: 1.78 - 4.90, respectively), while the other molecular subtypes showed no significant association of DFS or DMFS with age. Age was a stronger predictor of 5- year DFS and 5-year DMFS than tumor grade or proliferative index (Ki67) in LuminalA BCA patients, but not other subtypes.
Gene expression data were obtained from 1097 BCA TCGA patients, divided into two groups (≤40y, n=36; >40y, n=455). We identified 374 DEG between ≤40y and >40y LuminalA BCA subsets. The DEG were enriched in 7 pathways, and the WGCNA analysis identified two modules of co-expressed genes. No age group-specific DEG were identified in non-LuminalA subtypes.
Conclusion: Age at diagnosis may be an important prognostic factor in LuminalA BCA and may improve risk stratification and personalized therapy. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the prognostic value of age in this subset of BCA patients.
Citation Format: Liu Z, Sahli Z, Wang Y, Wolff AC, Cope L, Umbricht CB. Young age at diagnosis is associated with worse prognosis in the luminal A breast cancer subtype. A retrospective institutional cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-35.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Liu
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Qingdao Municipal Hospital (East), Qingdao, China; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Z Sahli
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Qingdao Municipal Hospital (East), Qingdao, China; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Y Wang
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Qingdao Municipal Hospital (East), Qingdao, China; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - AC Wolff
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Qingdao Municipal Hospital (East), Qingdao, China; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - L Cope
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Qingdao Municipal Hospital (East), Qingdao, China; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - CB Umbricht
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Qingdao Municipal Hospital (East), Qingdao, China; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rugo HS, Mayer EL, Storniolo AM, Isaacs C, Mayer I, Stearns V, Nanda R, Nangia J, Wabl C, Deluca A, Kochupurakkal B, Wolff AC, Shapiro GI. Abstract PD2-12: Palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant or tamoxifen as treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with prior chemotherapy for advanced disease (TBCRC 035) A phase II study with pharmacodynamics markers. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-pd2-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Addition of the cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) palbociclib to endocrine therapy in the first and later line settings significantly improves progression free survival (PFS) in patients with HR+ MBC. The primary toxicity is neutropenia without an increase in febrile neutropenia. TBCRC035 explored rates of neutropenia in patients who had received prior chemotherapy for MBC with 2 dose levels of palbociclib, and correlated changes in retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation (pRB) and Ki67 expression in proliferating keratinocytes and tumor with response.
Methods
TBCRC035 is a 1:1 randomized multicenter phase II study evaluating palbociclib at either 125 or 100 mg in combination with physician choice fulvestrant or tamoxifen. Eligible patients (pts) with HR+ MBC had received >1 but <3 lines of chemotherapy for MBC, any number of prior hormone therapies, and were naïve to CDK4/6i. The primary endpoint was grade 3/4 neutropenia; secondary endpoints included response, safety/tolerability, inhibition of pRB and change in Ki67 in skin and tumor at day 14-21 of treatment compared to baseline. FFPE sections of skin punch and tumor biopsies obtained before and on treatment were stained using antibodies to Ki67, total RB, and phospho-RB-S780 using BOND polymer red detection. Stained slides were scanned into the Aperio image analysis platform; the percentage of marker positive cells and H-score was determined.
Results
70 pts were enrolled (fully accrued); 35 randomized to 100 vs 125 mg of palbociclib respectively; data for the last 3 pts on the 125 mg arm is pending. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common in the 125 mg vs the 100 mg arm (56 vs 34%); dose adjustments for adverse events (AEs) occurred in 47 vs 43%, 4 vs 0 pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was rare (1 patient each arm). Median duration of treatment was 5.2 vs 7.2 months. Response data and correlation with changes in pRB and Ki67 expression in skin and tumor by treatment arm will be reported.
Conclusion
In pts with prior chemotherapy for HR+ MBC, treatment with 100 mg of palbociclib in patients is associated with a lower rate of > grade 3 neutropenia compared to 125 mg. Correlation of response by dose with pRB and Ki67 has the potential to inform palbociclib dosing and reduce toxicity for pts with HR+ MBC.
Citation Format: Rugo HS, Mayer EL, Storniolo AM, Isaacs C, Mayer I, Stearns V, Nanda R, Nangia J, Wabl C, Deluca A, Kochupurakkal B, Wolff AC, Shapiro GI. Palbociclib in combination with fulvestrant or tamoxifen as treatment for hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with prior chemotherapy for advanced disease (TBCRC 035) A phase II study with pharmacodynamics markers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HS Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - EL Mayer
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - AM Storniolo
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - C Isaacs
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - I Mayer
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - V Stearns
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - R Nanda
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - J Nangia
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - C Wabl
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - A Deluca
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - B Kochupurakkal
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - AC Wolff
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| | - GI Shapiro
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center, Boston; Indiana University, Indianapolis; Georgetown University, Washington; Vanderbilt University, Nashville; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Chicago, Chicago; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith KL, Griffin JM, Tsai HL, Leathers M, Hays A, Lu DY, Zhang Z, Rosner GL, Russell SD, Connolly RM, Jelovac D, Visvanathan K, Wolff AC, Stearns V, Abraham T. Abstract P4-16-09: Effect of simvastatin on cardiac strain in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline therapy. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-16-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Cardiac toxicity (CT) is a rare late effect of anthracycline therapy for breast cancer (BC). Statins may attenuate the CT of anthracyclines. Myocardial strain can detect subclinical CT before ejection fraction (EF) declines. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) ≥-19% and relative change (RelΔ) in GLS≥11% predict future decline in EF. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the effect of simvastatin on GLS in BC patients receiving anthracyclines. Methods: We enrolled women with stage I-III BC planning doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) x 4. Women with heart disease or taking a statin were excluded. Participants were randomized 1:1 to simvastatin 40 mg daily x 24 weeks (wk) + AC or to AC alone. We performed echo with strain 5 times: baseline (BL), pre-AC#2, 1-3 wk after AC#4, 24 wk after AC #1 and 52 wk after AC#1. The primary endpoint was the mean absolute change (|Δ|) in GLS from BL to 1-3 wk after AC#4. Secondary endpoints included RelΔ in GLS, feasibility and safety. We used two-sample t-tests to compare mean changes in GLS and Fisher's exact test to compare dichotomized GLS values. The study closed early due to loss of staff. Results: Of 31 patients, 15 (48%) received simvastatin+AC. Mean age was 46 years; 71% pre-menopausal, 61% white and 32% black. There were no significant differences in BL cardiovascular risk factors between the arms. After AC, 3 HER2+ patients received trastuzumab. There were no grade 3-4 AEs with simvastatin. Common grade 1-2 AEs included myalgia (20%), elevated AST (27%) and elevated ALT (53%). One patient in the AC arm died from heart failure with low EF 2 months after having a normal echo 1-3 wk after AC#4. The rate of missing echos was 14%. Of 133 completed echos, 124 (93%) were evaluable for GLS. Mean GLS was <-19% at all times in the simvastatin+AC arm. Mean GLS was <-19% at BL and pre-AC#2 in the AC arm, but ≥-19% at post-AC times in the AC arm. Mean EF was >60% at all times in both arms. Among 27 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, there was no significant difference in mean |Δ| in GLS from BL to 1-3 wk after AC#4 between the arms (Simvastatin+AC: 0.42%; AC: 1.11%, p=0.57). In addition, there were no differences in the mean|Δ| in GLS from BL to any other time between the arms (all p>0.1). The proportion of patients with GLS<-19% was higher in the simvastatin+AC arm than in the AC arm pre-AC#2 (73% vs 44%), 1-3 wk after AC#4 (67% vs 38%), 24 wk after AC #1 (53% vs 25%) and 52 wk after AC#1 (53% vs 25%) (all p>0.05). The proportion of patients with RelΔ in GLS≥11% from BL was lower in the simvastatin+AC arm than in the AC arm pre-AC#2 (13% vs 19%), 1-3 wk after AC#4 (20% vs 44%) and 24 wk after AC#1(27% vs 31%) (all p>0.05). Conclusion: Simvastatin did not result in a statistically significant difference in the mean |Δ| in GLS from BL to 1-3 wk after AC#4. However, the study was underpowered due to small sample size and there was a suggestion of reduced CT with simvastatin. Co-administration of simvastatin and AC was safe and serial echocardiographic strain monitoring was feasible. Further studies are needed to evaluate the cardioprotective effect of statins on strain in BC patients receiving anthracyclines.
Citation Format: Smith KL, Griffin JM, Tsai H-L, Leathers M, Hays A, Lu D-Y, Zhang Z, Rosner GL, Russell SD, Connolly RM, Jelovac D, Visvanathan K, Wolff AC, Stearns V, Abraham T. Effect of simvastatin on cardiac strain in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-16-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KL Smith
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - JM Griffin
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - H-L Tsai
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - M Leathers
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Hays
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - D-Y Lu
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - Z Zhang
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - GL Rosner
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - SD Russell
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - RM Connolly
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - D Jelovac
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - K Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - V Stearns
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - T Abraham
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Duke University, Durham, NC; Johns Hopkins Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center for Excellence, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shah M, Hunter N, Ensminger J, Shinn D, Cole AJ, Quinn HE, Edelstein DL, Wang C, Smith KL, Richardson AL, Cimino-Mathews A, Wolff AC, Cravero K, Park BH, Stearns V. Abstract P4-01-16: Detection of plasma tumor DNA (ptDNA) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR+HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) in clinical remission. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-01-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Detection of ptDNA in patients with HR+HER2- EBC in clinical remission may impact recommendations for type and duration of adjuvant endocrine therapy. A sensitive technique to identify tumor mutations in plasma is BEAMing digital PCR. The frequency and timing of detectable mutations in plasma of patients in clinical remission from HR+HER2- EBC are unknown.
Methods: We screened a prospective institutional repository for patients that met inclusion criteria. Eligible patients must have been enrolled to the repository between 12/1/2008 (repository start) and 12/31/2016, had HR+HER2- EBC, received follow-up at Johns Hopkins with appointment scheduled between 3/1/2017 and 12/31/2017, completed curative surgery at least 6 months prior to this appointment, been recommended or initiated adjuvant endocrine therapy, and been in clinical remission. Appropriate patients were approached for a current blood sample during their follow-up appointment in 2017. Blood was analyzed using a BEAMing digital PCR platform (Sysmex Inostics OncoBEAM™) for AKT1, PIK3CA, and ESR1 mutations.
Results: We identified 67 eligible patients and collected blood from 60. Most patients had relatively low risk disease including 40 patients (67%) with stage I disease, and only 21 patients (35%) received chemotherapy. Patients were evenly divided between receiving tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor, and some patients switched from one to the other. The majority of patients (68%) had surgery between 1 and 5 years prior to the current blood draw. Detailed patient characteristics are provided in Table 1.
Two out of the 60 patients had detectable ptDNA, both with stage IIA disease. One patient had a mutation in the ESR1 ligand-binding domain P535H 9 months after surgery and while taking adjuvant tamoxifen for 7 months. Sanger sequencing of primary tumor tissue did not reveal this mutation. Another patient had a mutation in PIK3CA exon 9 E542K 9.5 years after surgery and after taking adjuvant tamoxifen for at least 7 years. Amplifying this locus in DNA from primary tumor tissue was unsuccessful; further analysis using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is planned.
Conclusions: Detection of ptDNA was feasible in a relatively low-risk group of patients with HR+HER2- EBC in clinical remission. Sampling a larger number of patients is needed to gain more understanding of the frequency and timing of detectable ptDNA. Next steps should also focus on determining the natural history of detectable ptDNA in patients with HR+HER2 EBC in clinical remission which may impact adjuvant treatment recommendations.
Funding sources: Komen SAC110053, P30 CA06973, Breast Cancer Research Foundation
Table 1:Characteristics of included patients N (%)Total patients60Age at diagnosis, median(range)57 (30-77)Female59 (98)Caucasian54 (90)Postmenopausal at diagnosis36 (60)Tumor size <2 cm42 (70)Node negative45 (75)Invasive ductal histology44 (73)Received adjuvant chemotherapy21 (35)Type of adjuvant endocrine therapy Tamoxifen25 (42)Aromatase inhibitor26 (43)Tamoxifen and AI7 (12)None2 (3)Time after surgery 6 months to <1 year6 (10)1 year to <5 years41 (68)5 years to <10 years13 (22)
Citation Format: Shah M, Hunter N, Ensminger J, Shinn D, Cole AJ, Quinn HE, Edelstein DL, Wang C, Smith KL, Richardson AL, Cimino-Mathews A, Wolff AC, Cravero K, Park BH, Stearns V. Detection of plasma tumor DNA (ptDNA) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR+HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC) in clinical remission [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-16.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Shah
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - N Hunter
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - J Ensminger
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - D Shinn
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - AJ Cole
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - HE Quinn
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - DL Edelstein
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - C Wang
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - KL Smith
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - AL Richardson
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Cimino-Mathews
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - AC Wolff
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - K Cravero
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - BH Park
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - V Stearns
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sysmex Inostics, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Santa-Maria CA, Wang C, Cimino-Mathews A, Roussos-Torres E, Connolly RM, Wolff AC, Jaffee EM, Stearns V. Abstract OT3-02-03: IMMUNe mOdulation in early stage estrogen receptor positive breast cancer treated with neoADjuvant Avelumab, Palbociclib, and Tamoxifen: The ImmunoADAPT study (NCT03573648). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-ot3-02-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
While some patients with early stage endocrine receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer experience excellent prognosis, a subset of patients with more aggressive phenotypes still have a high rate of recurrence despite optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, thus novel therapies are needed for patients with high risk disease.
Although immune checkpoint blockade has shown significant benefit in numerous types of cancer, initial reports demonstrate low response rates to single agent programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition in ER+ breast cancer. Inhibitors of cyclin dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6 in combination with endocrine therapy are highly active in breast cancer, and recently have been demonstrated to recruit immune cells, and increase PD-L1 on tumor cells in preclinical models. Increased tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been observed with neoadjuvant treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with ER+ breast cancer. We thus hypothesize that the addition of palbociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) will improve responses to avelumab (PD-L1) inhibitor in patients with high risk ER+ breast cancer.
Trial Design:
Eligible participants are those stage II or III ER+HER2- breast cancer (T2N0 must have ≥grade 2, T1N+ must have at least a 1.5cm breast primary). Patients will undergo a baseline MRI and biopsy, start tamoxifen +/- palbociclib for 1 cycle (1 cycle =28 days), and then undergo a repeat MRI and biopsy. Avelumab will be added to both arms in cycle 2. Patients will be treated for 3 cycles of avelumab with tamoxifen +/- palbociclib (thus 4 cycles total, including run-in without avelumab). Patients will be treated as long as there is no evidence of progression and therapy is tolerated, and then undergo MRI and surgery. The primary objective is to determine the clinical complete response (cCR) rate by MRI. Secondary objectives include evaluation of TILs (H&E), CD8 and FOXP3 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire (TCR sequencing), multiplex gene expression panel (Nanostring), and multiplex IHC. Changes in these immune biomarkers will be assessed to determine differential immunophenotypic effects of palbociclib, and correlated to cCR in each arm.
The sample size of this pilot study is determined by primary analysis on the cCR rate. We hypothesize that the addition of palbociclib to tamoxifen will result in an increase rate of cCR in patients receiving avelumab. We hypothesize that the addition of avelumab will increase the response rate to palbociclib and tamoxifen by 30%. We thus estimate that a total of 40 evaluable patients (20 to each arm) will provide close to 80% power to detect a difference on cCR rates of 10% vs 40% at two-sided alpha level 10%. We will evaluate and compare cCR rates between arms by conducting Fisher's Exact test and reporting the estimated proportions together with their exact confidence intervals. Logistic regression analysis will also be conducted to explore the association between cCR and immune biomarkers.
This study has received IRB approval and is open as of Summer 2018.
Citation Format: Santa-Maria CA, Wang C, Cimino-Mathews A, Roussos-Torres E, Connolly RM, Wolff AC, Jaffee EM, Stearns V. IMMUNe mOdulation in early stage estrogen receptor positive breast cancer treated with neoADjuvant Avelumab, Palbociclib, and Tamoxifen: The ImmunoADAPT study (NCT03573648) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CA Santa-Maria
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - C Wang
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Cimino-Mathews
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - E Roussos-Torres
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - RM Connolly
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - EM Jaffee
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - V Stearns
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Downs BM, Cope LM, Fackler MJ, Cho S, Wolff AC, Regan MM, Sukumar S, Umbricht CB. Abstract P5-12-04: A new method of data analysis to derive DNA methylation signatures that stratify risk of recurrence in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p5-12-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 10-17% of all breast cancer and is more likely to be of higher histological grade, poorly differentiated, associated with a higher recurrence rate and with decreased overall survival. The clinical course of a TNBC patient remains difficult to predict, as tumors with homogenous morphological characteristics may vary in response to therapy and have divergent outcomes. Therefore, additional analytical methods are needed to better classify TNBC. Our goal is to refine the analysis of methylome datasets to derive reliable molecular signatures that can distinguish TNBC patients with good outcomes who may benefit from less aggressive treatment, from those with poor outcomes who would be candidates for more aggressive treatments.
Methods: Our laboratory has conducted and reported, in this meeting, results from analysis of 450k methylation array data on a discovery set of 53 high-risk TNBC cases and 62 low-risk controls treated by locoregional therapy alone, as well as 5 normal breast tissue samples. High-risk cases were defined as patients that relapsed within 0.5 to 6.5 years from the time of diagnosis, while low-risk controls had no relapse and >4 year recurrence-free intervals (RFI). In this work, we devised and applied a novel methylation biomarker discovery program named Hypermethylated Outlier Detector (HOD) that emphasizes the selection of highly methylated markers in cases compared to controls, to find a high-risk signature in the TNBC discovery set. The methylation signature identified by HOD was interrogated in a test set of 50 TNBCs (with 16 recurrences) that did not receive chemotherapy, and in a second test set of 131 TNBCs (with 33 recurrences) that did receive chemotherapy.
Results: HOD identified 39 hypermethylated markers (beta >0.20) that could accurately distinguish between the high-risk cases and the low-risk controls in the discovery set of TNBCs (n=115) treated with locoregional therapy alone. In the test set of TNBC (n=50) with no chemotherapy the 39 markers distinguished high from low risk individuals (likelihood ratio test P=0.049). In a second test set of TNBC (n=131) that received chemotherapy the 39 hypermethylated markers again distinguished high from low risk individuals (likelihood ratio test P=0.0043).
Conclusions: We have presented evidence that a methylation signature identified by HOD can be used to identify TNBC patients that have a high-risk of relapse regardless of receiving chemotherapy. This methylation signature could potentially be used to inform physician decisions on therapeutic strategies for TNBC patients. This could ultimately lead to less aggressive treatment given to patients possessing a methylation profile consistent with a better prognosis. Conversely, patients with hypermethylation in the 39 markers will likely benefit from a more aggressive course of treatment.
Citation Format: Downs BM, Cope LM, Fackler MJ, Cho S, Wolff AC, Regan MM, Sukumar S, Umbricht CB. A new method of data analysis to derive DNA methylation signatures that stratify risk of recurrence in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- BM Downs
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; IBCSG Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - LM Cope
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; IBCSG Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - MJ Fackler
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; IBCSG Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - S Cho
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; IBCSG Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; IBCSG Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - MM Regan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; IBCSG Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - S Sukumar
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; IBCSG Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - CB Umbricht
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; IBCSG Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fackler MJ, Cho SS, Cope LM, Gabrielson E, Wilsbach K, Lynch C, Marks JR, Geradts J, Regan MM, Viale G, Wolff AC, Umbricht CB, Sukumar S. Abstract P4-08-09: DNA methylation markers predict recurrence-free interval in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-08-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Chemotherapy remains the treatment mainstay for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Nevertheless, randomized trials have shown that not all TNBC require it, nor does it benefit all patients that receive it. Molecular tools to risk-stratify TNBC are currently lacking. In light of the importance of epigenetic processes modulating gene expression, we performed an array-based genome-wide DNA methylation search in well-documented institutional and clinical trial cohorts of TNBC for markers that can distinguish breast cancers with a favorable natural history from those with a high risk of recurrence.
METHODS. We performed an array-based genome-wide DNA methylation survey of well-documented institutional and clinical trial cohorts of TNBC and conducted molecular marker discovery on institutional TNBCs (115 patient samples; 53 recurrences) treated by locoregional therapy (LRT) alone. The identified hypermethylated gene signatures were then tested in a TNBC cohort (50 patient samples; 16 recurrences) from the no chemotherapy arms of IBCSG trials VIII and IX, and in a separate combined cohort of TNBCs (131 patient samples; 33 recurrences) treated with chemotherapy from an institutional repository and from IBCSG trials VIII and IX. Cross platform validation was conducted using quantitative multiplexed methylation specific PCR (QM-MSP) on hypermethylated markers in samples from both the Discovery Set and IBCSG LRT Test Set.
RESULTS. We identified methylation signatures in the discovery cohort consisting of 100 or 30 CpG probes that discriminated patients who remained recurrence-free from those with recurrent disease. These signatures were then tested in the IBCSG no chemotherapy cohort, and we found that hypermethylation was associated with shorter recurrence-free interval (RFI). A significant association of both 100 CpG (P<0.0001) and 30 CpG (P=0.0021) signatures with shorter RFI was found in the combined institutional and IBCSG chemotherapy cohort. We observed an enrichment of methylation probes residing on chromosome 19, particularly within 19q13.41-43, that significantly correlated with RFI following chemotherapy. QM-MSP results reflected that of the methylation array [Spearman correlation coefficient of r = 0.495 (P = 0.0009)] indicating that the relationship between high methylation and short RFI is detectable independent of analytical platform. We also observed enrichment for Chromosome 19-specific probes within the 100 and 30 probe sets. While only 5% of all CpG markers are located within Chr19, 15% of the 100 CpG set, 37% of the 30 CpG set, and 47% of the 17 CpGs that are statistically significantly correlated with RFI in the chemotherapy group reside on the Chr19, mostly within 19q13.41-43.
CONCLUSIONS. Methylation markers may be of prognostic importance in TNBC and our findings should be validated in additional clinical trial cohorts.
Citation Format: Fackler MJ, Cho SS, Cope LM, Gabrielson E, Wilsbach K, Lynch C, Marks JR, Geradts J, Regan MM, Viale G, Wolff AC, Umbricht CB, Sukumar S. DNA methylation markers predict recurrence-free interval in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MJ Fackler
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - SS Cho
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - LM Cope
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - E Gabrielson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - K Wilsbach
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - C Lynch
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - JR Marks
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - J Geradts
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - MM Regan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - G Viale
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - CB Umbricht
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| | - S Sukumar
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; State Health Registry of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Skuli SJ, Bantug ET, Zafman N, Riley C, Ruck JM, Sheng J, Smith KC, Snyder CF, Smith KL, Stearns V, Wolff AC. Abstract P6-12-21: Breast cancer survivors undergoing survivorship visits at Johns Hopkins are a high-risk population. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p6-12-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are strongly recommended for all breast cancer survivors to address sequelae of cancer care, plan cancer surveillance and screening, and encourage health promotion and care coordination. Ongoing studies are evaluating the impact of SCPs in cancer survivor populations and the role of survivorship visits (SVs) as an intervention. Here we describe characteristics and outcomes of patients who participated in SVs at Johns Hopkins (JH).
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who participated in a SV with one of two nurse practitioners ˜1-3 months after completion of locoregional therapy and initial systemic therapy, as referred by their JH breast cancer provider. We collected patient demographics, comorbidity status, tumor characteristics, treatments received, and responses to GAD7 (generalized anxiety disorder 7-item), PHQ9 (patient health questionnaire-9), and a symptom questionnaire. Characteristics of SV participants were compared to analytical breast cancer cases from the JH Cancer Registry (JHCR 2010-2015), matched for stage.
Results: 87 women (stages I-III) who participated in a SV in 2010-2016 were identified. Compared to patients in the JHCR (n=2,942), the SV cohort was younger (age ≤50, 43% v 34%, p=0.14), more likely to be African American (33% v 22%, p=0.04), and more likely to have a higher TNM stage (I, 26% v 49%; II, 48% v 37%; III, 25% v 15%, p<0.001), node-positive status (60% v 33%, p<0.001), hormone receptor-negative disease (44% v 18%, p<0.001), and HER2-positive disease (38% v 14%, p<0.001). The SV cohort was also more likely to receive chemotherapy (94% v 43%, p<0.001) and undergo radiation therapy (78% v 54%, p<0.001). The SV cohort had a higher recurrence event rate than the JHCR cohort (11.5% v 8.0%) and a shorter median follow-up (886 v 1292 days), suggestive of a higher risk profile. In the SV cohort, a comparison of comorbidities at breast cancer diagnosis versus time of SV visit identified a significant increase in the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy (9% v 73%, p<.001), anemia (15% v 50%, p<.001), lymphedema (0% v 28%, p<.001), anxiety (15% v 38%, p<.001), and depression (13% v 29%, p<.001). Patients in the SV cohort were overweight at diagnosis (body mass index, median 29 [IQR 24, 32]). At the time of the SV, patients reported symptoms of sleep difficulty (53%), numbness or tingling (46%), weight changes (45%), muscle aches (44%), and pain (37%).
Conclusions: Patients who participated in SVs had high-risk cancers and, compared to baseline, a higher frequency of comorbidities that are potentially associated with breast cancer and its treatment. These data can inform future breast cancer survivorship care models as they describe a population that may be at greater risk for worse cancer and non-cancer outcomes, and that might benefit more from interventions like SCPs and SVs. Ongoing studies are identifying optimal target populations, appropriate timing of such interventions, and informative measures of patient-centered outcomes.
Funding: Komen Maryland/Komen Scholar SAC110053 (ACW).
Citation Format: Skuli SJ, Bantug ET, Zafman N, Riley C, Ruck JM, Sheng J, Smith KC, Snyder CF, Smith KL, Stearns V, Wolff AC. Breast cancer survivors undergoing survivorship visits at Johns Hopkins are a high-risk population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SJ Skuli
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - ET Bantug
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - N Zafman
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - C Riley
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - JM Ruck
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - J Sheng
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - KC Smith
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - CF Snyder
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - KL Smith
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - V Stearns
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schroder C, Cardoso F, Dijkstra N, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Linderholm B, Morgenstern D, Van Poznak C, Wolff AC, Poncet C, Gomez HL, Aalders K, Bjelic-Radisic V, Werutsky G, Tryfonidis K, Coens C, Giordano SH, Ruddy KJ. Abstract P5-23-02: Quality of life (QoL) in male breast cancer (BC): Prospective study of the EORTC10085/TBCRC029/BIG2-07/NABCG International male BC program. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p5-23-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Male BC is a rare disease (dx) for which management is extrapolated from trials in female BC. Comprehensive prospective data about QoL in men with BC could inform treatment. The international Male BC Consortium conducted a prospective registry of male BC patients of all stages who newly presented to a participating center between October 2013 and February 2017. A QoL substudy was conducted as part of this registry at most participating sites.
Methods: Informed consent for participation in the QoL substudy was requested from new enrollees. Those who consented were asked to complete a survey including the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 (breast cancer specific module), adapted by replacing female-specific items with male-specific sexual activity/function items from the prostate module (PR25). Outcomes were scored according to standard EORTC QLQ procedures on a 0-100 scale (with higher scores on QoL/functioning scales representing better QoL and functioning, and higher scores on symptom scales representing worse symptoms). Forms were analyzed centrally by EORTC. In order to compare to female BC, we used reference data from 2782 mixed age (62% under age 60) women with BC (of whom 1,147 had recurrent or metastatic dx, and 464 had stage 1-2 dx) reported in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values manual (2008).
Results: A total of 557 men were enrolled in EORTC10085, 445 at sites participating in the QoL substudy. Consent forms were received from 422/445 (95%) for the substudy. Baseline survey (required to be completed within 30 days of enrollment) compliance was 85% (359/422). Median age at diagnosis was 67 years. There were 111 men (45%) with node-positive M0/MX dx and 27 men (8%) with M1 dx. Their median global health status score at baseline was 75 (IQR 67-83), higher than that documented historically in female BC (67, with IQR 50-83, in both the 2782 women with mixed stage and the subgroup of 464 with stage 1-2 tumors). The participating men's median social functioning score was 100 (IQR 67-100), also higher than the 83.3 (IQR 67-100) reported in mixed stage female BC patients, though no different than the 100 (IQR 67-100) found in women with stage 1-2 dx. Men's most commonly reported symptoms included fatigue (median score 13.9, IQR 0-33), insomnia (median score 0, IQR 0-33), and pain (median score 0, IQR 0-33), for which women's median scores were 33 (IQR 11-44), 33 (IQR 0-33), and 17 (IQR 0-50) with mixed stage dx, and 22 (IQR 0-33), 33 (IQR 0-33), and 17 (IQR 0-33) with stage 1-2 dx. Men's median sexual activity score was 33.3 (IQR 0-50), with less sexual activity reported by older patients and men with M1 dx. In those who were sexually active, median sexual function score was 83 (IQR 75-92), with no difference by age or stage.
Conclusions: QoL and symptom burden in male BC patients appears no worse (and possibly better) than that in female patients. Future analyses of 1- and 5-year surveys from this study will assess the impact of specific treatments on changes in symptoms and QoL over time. These data will be useful in future efforts to tailor treatments and target interventions for male BC.
Funding: Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Dutch Pink Ribbon Foundation, Swedish BRO, and EBCC Council.
Citation Format: Schroder C, Cardoso F, Dijkstra N, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Linderholm B, Morgenstern D, Van Poznak C, Wolff AC, Poncet C, Gomez HL, Aalders K, Bjelic-Radisic V, Werutsky G, Tryfonidis K, Coens C, Giordano SH, Ruddy KJ. Quality of life (QoL) in male breast cancer (BC): Prospective study of the EORTC10085/TBCRC029/BIG2-07/NABCG International male BC program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-23-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schroder
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - F Cardoso
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - N Dijkstra
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - E van Leeuwen-Stok
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - B Linderholm
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D Morgenstern
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - C Van Poznak
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - AC Wolff
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - C Poncet
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - HL Gomez
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - K Aalders
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - V Bjelic-Radisic
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - G Werutsky
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - K Tryfonidis
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - C Coens
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - SH Giordano
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - KJ Ruddy
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Dutch Breast Cancer Trialists' Research Group (BOOG), Amsterdam, Netherlands; Sahlgrenska University Hospital & Swedish Association of Breast Oncologists (SABO), Gothenburg, Sweden; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Unversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Lutherville, MD; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru; Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fackler MJ, Downs BM, Mercado-Rodriguez C, Cimino-Mathews A, Chen C, Yuan J, Cope LM, Kohlway A, Kocmond K, Lai E, Weidler J, Visvanathan K, Umbricht CB, Harvey S, Wolff AC, Bates M, Sukumar S. Abstract P6-03-07: An automated DNA methylation assay (QM-MSP) for rapid breast cancer diagnosis in underdeveloped countries. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p6-03-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Underdeveloped countries reported 882,900 new cases of breast cancer and 324,000 deaths in 2012, likely to be a gross underestimation according to recent reports. Often, mammography screening is not available, primary care services are limited, and pathology and treatment services are available only in the regional hospitals. Because of the lack of access to diagnostic and treatment services, it is estimated that more than 90% of patients with breast cancer never present for medical treatment. To address this situation, an accurate, easy-to-perform diagnostic test appropriate for use in remote clinics is desperately needed. Johns Hopkins (JH) and Cepheid partnered to translate a robust Quantitative Multiplex Methylation-Specific PCR (QM-MSP) assay to an automated, cartridge-based system that provides quantitative measures of DNA methylation within hours of fine needle aspiration or core biopsy of image-detected suspicious lesions.
METHODS: With a goal of discriminating malignant from benign breast disease with high sensitivity and specificity, we evaluated 24 breast cancer-specific DNA methylation markers (selected through comprehensive methylome analysis) in 119 invasive ductal carcinomas and 186 benign breast tissues. QM-MSP was performed on sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues to quantify DNA methylation. The dynamic range and performance of quantitative methylation detection was tested using a subset of 9 genes in the cartridge-based system.
RESULTS: QM-MSP was performed in a Training set consisting of 93 tissues [n=43 IDC, n=50 benign lesions (25 usual ductal hyperplasia, UDH, and 25 papilloma)] from the US. We selected 9 DNA markers significantly (p<0.05) more methylated in malignant compared to benign lesions, which had low or no methylation. An independent Test set consisted of benign (n=26) and malignant (n=10) tissues (mostly Caucasian; JH Test Set). As a panel, the 9 markers were significantly more methylated in malignant than benign tissue (p<0.001), revealing a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 92%, using a laboratory cutoff of 9.5 CMI units (900 unit scale) based on receiver operator characteristic statistics (ROC; p<0.0001, AUC=0.977). To determine if the markers characterized in the JH Test Set could perform as well in samples from a different geography, the panel was tested on 176 tissues from Wuhan, China (China Test Set). In this cohort (66 IDC and 110 benign tissues - 49 fibroadenoma, 19 benign cyst, 12 UDH, 30 papilloma), sensitivity was 89% and specificity was 89% for detection of breast cancer with ROC AUC=0.945. An advanced version of the cartridge with up to 12 methylated DNA markers is under development, thus far showing robust signals in cancer and low background in benign tissues. Current work at JH is focused on optimizing the technical performance of the cartridge.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified a panel of methylated DNA markers that discriminate malignant from benign breast lesions and built a prototype automated cartridge-based assay with promising sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer. Such an assay has the potential to aid in specimen triage in the pathology lab and provide fast, low cost and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer in LMIC settings.
Citation Format: Fackler MJ, Downs BM, Mercado-Rodriguez C, Cimino-Mathews A, Chen C, Yuan J, Cope LM, Kohlway A, Kocmond K, Lai E, Weidler J, Visvanathan K, Umbricht CB, Harvey S, Wolff AC, Bates M, Sukumar S. An automated DNA methylation assay (QM-MSP) for rapid breast cancer diagnosis in underdeveloped countries [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-03-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MJ Fackler
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - BM Downs
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - C Mercado-Rodriguez
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - A Cimino-Mathews
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - C Chen
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - J Yuan
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - LM Cope
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - A Kohlway
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - K Kocmond
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - E Lai
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - J Weidler
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - K Visvanathan
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - CB Umbricht
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - S Harvey
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - AC Wolff
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - M Bates
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| | - S Sukumar
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Cephied, Sunnyvale, CA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Smith KL, Yeruva SLH, Blackford A, Huang CY, Westbrook KE, Harding BA, Smith A, Fetting J, Wolff AC, Jelovac D, Miller RS, Connolly R, Armstrong D, Nunes R, Visvanathan K, Stearns V. Abstract P3-12-02: Predictors of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for early breast cancer (BC) in a prospective clinic-based cohort. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p3-12-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Adjuvant ET is associated with improved survival in women with hormone receptor-positive early BC. Nonetheless, more than a quarter of women are non-adherent or discontinue therapy early. We aimed to identify whether baseline characteristics and changes in weight and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) early during the course of ET are associated with medication adherence behavior (MAB) in a prospective cohort.
Methods: We enrolled women initiating or switching adjuvant ET for stage 0-III BC in a prospective clinic-based cohort. Participants completed PRO questionnaires at baseline, and 3, 6, and 12 months (mo) after initiating ET. PRO questionnaires included FACT-ES, the NIH PROMIS measures for pain interference, fatigue, depression, anxiety, physical function, and sleep disturbance, and the MOS Sexual Functioning Scale. MAB was assessed by the Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ). MAB was defined as high (MAQ score=0), or medium/low (MAQ score>0). Questionnaires were administered through the PatientViewpoint web-based interface. We tested changes in mean PRO scores from baseline to follow-up time points with paired t-tests. We explored associations between baseline characteristics, and changes in weight and PRO at 6 mo with MAB at 12 mo using Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxan rank sum tests and t-tests. P-values <0.05 were considered significant.
Results: From March 2012 to December 2016, 336 women enrolled in the cohort. Mean age was 60 (range 26-90), 84% were Caucasian, and 67% were post-menopausal. Overall, 57% received an aromatase inhibitor, 43% received tamoxifen, and 28% received prior taxane chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 12 mo. At baseline, 61% were overweight/obese, and 21% gained >5% of baseline weight by 12 mo. Mean baseline and follow-up scores at 3, 6 and 12 mo were within 1 standard deviation of reference population means for all PRO measures. Compared to baseline, endocrine symptoms were increased at 3, 6 and 12 mo (p<0.05), while sexual function and depression did not differ between baseline and any follow-up time point (p>0.05). At 6 mo, anxiety was reduced, physical function was improved and pain impact was reduced compared to baseline (p<0.05). MAB was high for 71% of participants at 12 mo. Preliminary data demonstrate that, compared to those with high MAB at 12 mo, women with medium/low MAB at 12 mo took fewer concomitant medications at baseline, and had more improvement in anxiety and sexual function at 6 mo. MAB at 12 mo did not differ according to race, type of ET, baseline weight or PRO measures, or 6 mo change in weight or other PRO measures.
Conclusions: Early changes in anxiety and sexual function during the course of adjuvant ET and the number of baseline concomitant medications may separate women with subsequent high versus medium/low MAB risk. Weight loss interventions and symptom management are needed for women receiving adjuvant ET during the first year of treatment. Our data will be used to create a model to predict MAB for validation studies and as the basis to devise interventions to improve adherence to adjuvant ET.
Citation Format: Smith KL, Yeruva SLH, Blackford A, Huang C-Y, Westbrook KE, Harding BA, Smith A, Fetting J, Wolff AC, Jelovac D, Miller RS, Connolly R, Armstrong D, Nunes R, Visvanathan K, Stearns V. Predictors of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for early breast cancer (BC) in a prospective clinic-based cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KL Smith
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - SLH Yeruva
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - A Blackford
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - C-Y Huang
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - KE Westbrook
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - BA Harding
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - A Smith
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - J Fetting
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - D Jelovac
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - RS Miller
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - R Connolly
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - D Armstrong
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - R Nunes
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - K Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - V Stearns
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Howard University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Van Osch M, Scarborough K, Crowe S, Wolff AC, Reimer-Kirkham S. Understanding the factors which promote registered nurses' intent to stay in emergency and critical care areas. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27:1209-1215. [PMID: 29148125 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVE To explore the influential factors and strategies that promote an experienced nurse's intent to stay in their emergency or critical care area. BACKGROUND Turnover among registered nurses (herein referred to as nurses) working in specialty areas of practice can result in a range of negative outcomes. The retention of specialty nurses at the unit level has important implications for hospital and health systems. These implications include lost knowledge and experience which may in turn impact staff performance levels, patient outcomes, hiring, orientating, development of clinical competence and other aspects of organizational performance. DESIGN This qualitative study used an interpretive descriptive design to understand nurses' perceptions of the current factors and strategies that promote them staying in emergency or critical care settings for two or more years. METHODS Focus groups were conducted with 13 emergency and critical care nurses. Data analysis involved thematic analysis that evolved from codes to categories to themes. RESULTS Four themes were identified: leadership, interprofessional relationships, job fit and practice environment. In addition, the ideas of feeling valued, respected and acknowledged were woven throughout. CONCLUSIONS Factors often associated with nurse attrition such as burnout and job stresses were not emphasised by the respondents in our study as critical to their intent to stay in their area of practice. This study has highlighted positive aspects that motivate nurses to stay in their specialty areas. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE To ensure quality care for patients, retention of experienced emergency and critical care nurses is essential to maintaining specialty expertise in these practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Van Osch
- Emergency Network, Fraser Health Authority, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | | | - Sarah Crowe
- Critical Care Network, Fraser Health Authority, Surrey, BC, Canada
| | - Angela C Wolff
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Baumbusch J, Shaw M, Leblanc ME, Kjorven M, Kwon JY, Blackburn L, Lawrie B, Shamatutu M, Wolff AC. Workplace continuing education for nurses caring for hospitalised older people. Int J Older People Nurs 2017; 12. [PMID: 28707743 DOI: 10.1111/opn.12161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To develop, implement and evaluate a workplace continuing education programme about nursing care of hospitalised older people. BACKGROUND The healthcare system cannot rely solely upon nurses' prelicensure education to prepare them to meet the evolving needs of hospitalised older patients. Over the past decade, there has been a dramatic rise in the proportion of older people in hospitals, yet many nurses do not have specialised knowledge about the unique care needs of this population. DESIGN A multimethod pre-to post-design was employed. METHODS Between September 2013 and April 2014, data were collected via surveys, focus groups and interviews. Thirty-two Registered Nurses initially enrolled in the programme of which 22 completed all data points. Three managers also participated in interviews. One-way repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to evaluate the effect of the programme and change over time. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Survey results indicated improvements in perceptions about nursing care of older people but no changes in knowledge. Themes generated from the qualitative data focused on participants' experiences of taking part in the programme and included: (i) relevance of content and delivery mode, (ii) value of participating in the programme and (iii) continuing education in the context of acute care. CONCLUSIONS This study illustrated the potential role of workplace continuing education in improving care for hospitalised older people, particularly the potential to change nurses' perceptions about this population. Nurses prefer learning opportunities that are varied in delivery of educational elder-focused content and accessible at work. Organisational leaders need to consider strategies that minimise potential barriers to workplace continuing education. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Workplace continuing education can play a key role in improving quality of care for hospitalized older adults and ought to be a priority for employers planning education for nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Baumbusch
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Marie-Eve Leblanc
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Jae-Yung Kwon
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Barb Lawrie
- Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Angela C Wolff
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Regan S, Wong C, Laschinger HK, Cummings G, Leiter M, MacPhee M, Rhéaume A, Ritchie JA, Wolff AC, Jeffs L, Young-Ritchie C, Grinspun D, Gurnham ME, Foster B, Huckstep S, Ruffolo M, Shamian J, Burkoski V, Wood K, Read E. Starting Out: qualitative perspectives of new graduate nurses and nurse leaders on transition to practice. J Nurs Manag 2017; 25:246-255. [PMID: 28244181 DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM To describe new graduate nurses' transition experiences in Canadian healthcare settings by exploring the perspectives of new graduate nurses and nurse leaders in unit level roles. BACKGROUND Supporting successful transition to practice is key to retaining new graduate nurses in the workforce and meeting future demand for healthcare services. METHOD A descriptive qualitative study using inductive content analysis of focus group and interview data from 42 new graduate nurses and 28 nurse leaders from seven Canadian provinces. RESULTS New graduate nurses and nurse leaders identified similar factors that facilitate the transition to practice including formal orientation programmes, unit cultures that encourage constructive feedback and supportive mentors. Impediments including unanticipated changes to orientation length, inadequate staffing, uncivil unit cultures and heavy workloads. CONCLUSIONS The results show that new graduate nurses need access to transition support and resources and that nurse leaders often face organisational constraints in being able to support new graduate nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT Organisations should ensure that nurse leaders have the resources they need to support the positive transition of new graduate nurses including adequate staffing and realistic workloads for both experienced and new nurses. Nurse leaders should work to create unit cultures that foster learning by encouraging new graduate nurses to ask questions and seek feedback without fear of criticism or incivility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Regan
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Carol Wong
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Heather K Laschinger
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Greta Cummings
- Faculty of Nursing, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Michael Leiter
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia
| | - Maura MacPhee
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ann Rhéaume
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Community Services, Universite de Moncton, Moncton, NB, Canada
| | - Judith A Ritchie
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Angela C Wolff
- Clinical Professional Development, Fraser Health, Professional Practice and Integration, Surrey, BC, Canada
| | - Lianne Jeffs
- Nursing Administration, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Doris Grinspun
- Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mary Ellen Gurnham
- Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Eastern Shore and West Hants, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Barbara Foster
- Office of Nursing Policy, Health Policy Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sherri Huckstep
- Planning, Integration, Evaluation and Community Engagement, North Simcoe Muskoka Local Health Integration Network, Orillia, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Kevin Wood
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Emily Read
- Faculty of Nursing, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Winner M, Rosman M, Mylander C, Jackson RS, Pozo ME, Wolff AC, Tafra L, Umbricht CB. Abstract P2-05-13: Negative progesterone receptor is associate early breast cancer relapse, even among good prognosis tumors. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p2-05-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background/objective: A minority of estrogen-receptor (ER) positive breast cancers lack progesterone receptor (PR) expression, but little is known of the clinical meaning of PR negativity (PR-). In the present study we sought to clarify the association between PR- and outcomes of ER+, human-epidermal growth factor (HER2)-negative breast cancers using a large, single institution database.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive, non-metastatic, unilateral HER2- invasive breast cancers diagnosed between 2000 and 2011. Records were reviewed for age at diagnosis, disease stage, tumor features, and histologically confirmed recurrence. ER+ and PR+ status was defined as ≥1% immunoreactive cells. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to determine the association between PR- and early (≤5 years) and late (>5 years) disease recurrence, defined as locoregional or distant breast cancer relapse >6 months after diagnosis.
Results: We identified 1,933 patients with TN (n=337) or ER+/HER2- (n=1,596) breast cancer. Patients with ER+/PR- (n=107) vs. ER+/PR+ (n=1,489) tumors did not differ in age or disease stage at diagnosis; however, PR- tumors were more frequently high grade (37.9% vs. 17.8%, p<0.001), with higher median Ki67 indices (20.0% vs. 10.0%, p<0.001). Median ER expression was also lower in PR- as compared to PR+ tumors (80.0% vs. 90.0%, p<0.001).
Over a median follow-up of 84 months, there were 119 early and 54 late locoregional or distant breast cancer relapses. Negative PR was strongly associated with early relapse, with PR- tumors demonstrating a 2.1-fold higher hazard of relapse in the first 5 years as compared to PR+ tumors (95% CI 1.0-4.2)
Hazards of early (<5 years) breast cancer relapse by hormone status. Shown are univariable Cox proportional hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals among all tumors, and in subsets defined by %ER, node status, Ki67, and grade. All tumors n=1,933High ER (80-100%) n=1,383TN3.9 (2.6-5.6)*--PR 0%2.1 (1.0-4.2)*1.7 (0.6-4.6)PR 1-100%ReferenceReference Node-negative n=1,299Node-positive n=634TN4.3 (2.5-7.5)*3.6 (2.1-6.0)*PR 0%2.7 (1.0-7.0)*1.6 (0.6-4.5)PR 1-100%ReferenceReference Ki67 <14% n=768Ki67 ≥14% n=997TN**2.4 (1.5-3.8)*PR 0%4.1 (1.2-14.1)*1.6 (0.7-3.8)PR 1-100%ReferenceReference Grade 1/2 n=1,337Grade 3 n=564TN3.4 (1.4-7.9)*1.9 (1.2-3.3)*PR 0%2.0 (0.7-5.7)1.2 (0.4-3.5)PR 1-100%ReferenceReference*p<0.05; **too few subjects/events for analysis.
Negative PR remained significantly associated with a higher hazard of early relapse even in node-negative (HR 2.7, 95%CI 1.0-7.0) and low-proliferating tumors (Ki67<14%, HR 4.1, 95%CI 1.2-14.1). There was no significant association between PR- and late breast cancer relapse (HR 0.7, 95%CI 0.2-2.9).
Conclusions: Compared to ER+/PR+ breast cancers, ER+/PR- breast cancers have a significantly greater risk of early recurrence, similar to triple-negative cancers. These results suggest that negative PR expression is importantly and independently associated with early breast cancer prognosis, and may be an indicator of unique tumor biology.
Citation Format: Winner M, Rosman M, Mylander C, Jackson RS, Pozo ME, Wolff AC, Tafra L, Umbricht CB. Negative progesterone receptor is associate early breast cancer relapse, even among good prognosis tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Winner
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD
| | - M Rosman
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD
| | - C Mylander
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD
| | - RS Jackson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD
| | - ME Pozo
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD
| | - AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD
| | - L Tafra
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD
| | - CB Umbricht
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; The Breast Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hayward D, Bungay V, Wolff AC, MacDonald V. A qualitative study of experienced nurses' voluntary turnover: learning from their perspectives. J Clin Nurs 2016; 25:1336-45. [PMID: 26990238 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this research was to critically examine the factors that contribute to turnover of experienced nurses' including their decision to leave practice settings and seek alternate nursing employment. In this study, we explore experienced nurses' decision-making processes and examine the personal and environmental factors that influenced their decision to leave. BACKGROUND Nursing turnover remains a pressing problem for healthcare delivery. Turnover contributes to increased recruitment and orientation cost, reduced quality patient care and the loss of mentorship for new nurses. DESIGN A qualitative, interpretive descriptive approach was used to guide the study. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 12 registered nurses, averaging 16 years in practice. Participants were equally represented from an array of acute care inpatient settings. The sample drew on perspectives from point-of-care nurses and nurses in leadership roles, primarily charge nurses and clinical nurse educators. RESULTS Nurses' decisions to leave practice were influenced by several interrelated work environment and personal factors: higher patient acuity, increased workload demands, ineffective working relationships among nurses and with physicians, gaps in leadership support and negative impacts on nurses' health and well-being. Ineffective working relationships with other nurses and lack of leadership support led nurses to feel dissatisfied and ill equipped to perform their job. The impact of high stress was evident on the health and emotional well-being of nurses. CONCLUSIONS It is vital that healthcare organisations learn to minimise turnover and retain the wealth of experienced nurses in acute care settings to maintain quality patient care and contain costs. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE This study highlights the need for healthcare leaders to re-examine how they promote collaborative practice, enhance supportive leadership behaviours, and reduce nurses' workplace stressors to retain the skills and knowledge of experienced nurses at the point-of-care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vicky Bungay
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Valerie MacDonald
- Fraser Health Authority, Burnaby Hospital Administration, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Azim HA, Sonnenblick A, Agbor-Tarh D, Bradbury I, Daly F, Huang Y, Dueck AC, Pritchard K, Wolff AC, Jackisch C, Lang I, Untch M, Smith I, Boyle F, Xu B, Gomez H, Perez E, Piccart M, de Azambuja E. Abstract PD5-07: The impact of early lapatinib-induced rash on disease-free and overall survival in patients treated within the ALTTO phase III randomized trial. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-pd5-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: We have previously shown in a phase III neoadjuvant trial that early development of lapatinib-induced rash (i.e. within 6 weeks after lapatinib initiation) is independently associated with a higher chance of obtaining a pathological complete response (Azim et al; JCO 2013). In the current study, we aimed to investigate whether early lapatinib-induced rash is associated with improved survival in the context of a large phase III adjuvant trial.
Methods: This analysis is based on the ALTTO trial (BIG 2-06, Alliance N063D), in which patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer were randomized to adjuvant trastuzumab, lapatinib, their sequence or their combination for a total duration of 1 year. In this sub-study, we evaluated whether the development of rash (any grade) within 6 weeks of lapatinib initiation was associated with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). All analyses were tested in a multivariate model adjusted for treatment arm, treatment completion and trial stratification factors.
Results: A total of 6,098 lapatinib-treated patients were included in the current analysis; of whom 2,006 patients (32.9%) developed early lapatinib-induced rash, 1,025 (16.8%) developed rash after 6 weeks and 3,067 (50.3%) did not develop rash. No differences in patient characteristics were observed between the three groups apart from a higher frequency of younger patients (≤ 50) in the early rash group (54% vs. 47% and 44%, p<0.0001). At a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 876 (14.37%) and 377 (6.18%) patients in the lapatinib containing arms experienced a DFS and OS event, respectively. In a multivariate analysis confined to patients randomized to the lapatinib containing arms, the development of early rash was associated with improved DFS (HR: 0.80; 95%CI: 0.69-0.93, p=0.004) and OS (HR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.48 - 0.78, p<0.001) compared to patients who did not develop early rash, with no interaction according to patient's age (p=0.9). No significant association was observed between the development of rash after 6 weeks of lapatinib initiation and survival. Compared to patients randomized to the trastuzumab alone arm (n=2,076), patients who developed early rash in the sequence (n=580) or combination (n=704) arms of trastuzumab/lapatinib had superior DFS (Sequence: HR 0.75 [95% CI: 0.58 – 0.98], p=0.034; Combination: HR 0.69 [95% CI: 0.54 – 0.89], p=0.005) and OS (Sequence: HR 0.57 [95%CI: 0.36 – 0.88], p=0.012; Combination: HR 0.59 [95% CI: 0.39 – 0.89], p=0.011). On the other hand, patients randomized to the lapatinib only arm who developed early rash (n=722) still had inferior DFS (HR 1.28 [95% CI: 1.04 – 1.59], p=0.02) with no difference in OS (HR: 0.95; 95%CI: 0.67 – 1.35, p=0.79) compared to patients randomized to the trastuzumab alone arm.
Conclusions: The results support our previous findings in the neoadjuvant setting that early development of skin rash within the first 6 weeks can identify patients who derive superior benefit of lapatinib treatment.
Citation Format: Azim Jr HA, Sonnenblick A, Agbor-Tarh D, Bradbury I, Daly F, Huang Y, Dueck AC, Pritchard K, Wolff AC, Jackisch C, Lang I, Untch M, Smith I, Boyle F, Xu B, Gomez H, Perez E, Piccart M, de Azambuja E. The impact of early lapatinib-induced rash on disease-free and overall survival in patients treated within the ALTTO phase III randomized trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HA Azim
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - A Sonnenblick
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - D Agbor-Tarh
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - I Bradbury
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - F Daly
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - Y Huang
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - AC Dueck
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - K Pritchard
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - AC Wolff
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - C Jackisch
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - I Lang
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - M Untch
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - I Smith
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - F Boyle
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - B Xu
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - H Gomez
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - E Perez
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - M Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| | - E de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet, Belgium; Frontier Science Scotland, United Kingdom; Novartis; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center; Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Hungary; Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany; Royal Marsden Hospital, United Kingdom; Mater Hospital, Australia; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Almost J, Wolff AC, Stewart-Pyne A, McCormick LG, Strachan D, D'Souza C. Managing and mitigating conflict in healthcare teams: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs 2016; 72:1490-505. [PMID: 26822008 DOI: 10.1111/jan.12903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM To review empirical studies examining antecedents (sources, causes, predictors) in the management and mitigation of interpersonal conflict. BACKGROUND Providing quality care requires positive, collaborative working relationships among healthcare team members. In today's increasingly stress-laden work environments, such relationships can be threatened by interpersonal conflict. Identifying the underlying causes of conflict and choice of conflict management style will help practitioners, leaders and managers build an organizational culture that fosters collegiality and create the best possible environment to engage in effective conflict management. DESIGN Integrative literature review. DATA SOURCES CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Proquest ABI/Inform, Cochrane Library and Joanne Briggs Institute Library were searched for empirical studies published between 2002-May 2014. REVIEW METHODS The review was informed by the approach of Whittemore and Knafl. Findings were extracted, critically examined and grouped into themes. RESULTS Forty-four papers met the inclusion criteria. Several antecedents influence conflict and choice of conflict management style including individual characteristics, contextual factors and interpersonal conditions. Sources most frequently identified include lack of emotional intelligence, certain personality traits, poor work environment, role ambiguity, lack of support and poor communication. Very few published interventions were found. CONCLUSION By synthesizing the knowledge and identifying antecedents, this review offers evidence to support recommendations on managing and mitigating conflict. As inevitable as conflict is, it is the responsibility of everyone to increase their own awareness, accountability and active participation in understanding conflict and minimizing it. Future research should investigate the testing of interventions to minimize these antecedents and, subsequently, reduce conflict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Almost
- School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela C Wolff
- Clinical Professional Development, Professional Practice, Fraser Health Authority, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Paoletti C, Li Y, Muñiz MC, Kidwell KM, Aung K, Thomas DG, Brown ME, Abramson V, Irvin WJ, Lin NU, Liu M, Nanda R, Nangia J, Storniolo AM, Traina TA, Vaklavas C, Van Poznak CH, Wolff AC, Forero A, Hayes DF. Abstract P1-04-01: Significance of circulating tumor cells in metastatic triple negative breast cancer: Results of an open label, randomized, phase II trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel with or without the anti-death receptor 5 tigatuzumab (TBCRC 019). Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p1-04-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Circulating Tumor cells (CTCs) are prognostic at baseline and first follow-up in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Using the most commonly used assay (CellSearch®), we have previously reported the ability to detect apoptotic vs. non-apoptotic CTCs in patients with MBC. However, there has been concern regarding the performance of the CellSearch® assay in patients with triple negative (TN) MBC. We hypothesized that CellSearch® is an effective assay in patients with TN MBC, and that CTC-apoptosis might further separate prognosis. Therefore, we studied CTCs in patients with TN MBC who participated in a prospective randomized phase II trial testing for activity of tigatuzumab (TIG) in combination with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PAC) conducted by the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (overall results reported by Forero A., et al, ASCO 2013).
Methods: Whole blood (WB) was drawn into a CellSave tube at baseline, day 15, and day 29 and CTC counts were determined using the CXC CellSearch® kit. Apoptosis was characterized by staining with a monoclonal antibody that detects a neo-epitope on fragmented cytokeratin (M-30) and independently by visual inspection (nucleic condensation and/or fragmentation, as well as granular cytokeratin). Association between levels of CTCs and CTC-apoptosis with the overall response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) at baseline, day 15, and day 29 was assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.
Results: Of the 60 patients entered into the trial, 52 were evaluable for CTCs. Of these, 19/52 (36.5%), 14/52 (26.9%), and 13/49 (26.5%) had elevated CTCs (≥5CTC/7.5 ml WB) at baseline, day 15, and day 29, respectively. Patients with elevated CTCs at each time point had worse PFS than patients with low or no CTCs. Hazard rates (HR) at baseline, day 15, and day 29 were 2.38 (95% CI: 1.27-4.45, p = 0.007), 2.87 (95% CI: 1.46-5.66, p = 0.002), and 3.40 (95% CI: 1.68-6.89, p = 0.001), respectively. The odds of overall response for those who had elevated CTCs compared to those who did not at baseline, day 15, and day 29, were 0.25 (95% CI: 0.073-0.81, p = 0.024), 0.18 (95% CI: 0.04-0.67, p = 0.014), and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01-0.28, p = 0.001), respectively. There was no apparent prognostic effect comparing the degree of CTC-apoptosis vs. non-apoptosis.
Conclusions: Similar to observations in other intrinsic subgroups, CTCs were detected in a large fraction of TN MBC patients at baseline using CellSearch® assay, and reductions in CTC levels reflected response. In these homogenously prospectively enrolled TN MBC patients, regardless of treatment, CTCs are prognostic at baseline, day 15, and day 29. It does not appear that analysis of CTC-apoptosis is prognostic.
Supported by Susan G. Komen for the Cure, Veridex, LLC, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale™ (DFH), Associazione Sandro Pitigliani and by a studentship from FIRC (CP), Triple Negative Breast Cancer Foundation, The AVON Foundation, and The Breast Cancer Research Foundation.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-04-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Paoletti
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Y Li
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - MC Muñiz
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - KM Kidwell
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - K Aung
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - DG Thomas
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - ME Brown
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - V Abramson
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - WJ Irvin
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - NU Lin
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - M Liu
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - R Nanda
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - J Nangia
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - AM Storniolo
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - TA Traina
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - C Vaklavas
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - CH Van Poznak
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - AC Wolff
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Forero
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - DF Hayes
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Vanderbilt Breast Cancer Center One Hundred Oaks, Nashville, TN; Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fackler MJ, Bujanda ZL, Umbricht C, Teo WW, Zhang Z, Visvanathan K, Jeter S, Argani P, Wang C, Ingle JN, Boughey J, McGuire K, King TA, Carey LA, Cope LA, Wolff AC, Sukumar S. Abstract P2-06-01: cMethDNA is a quantitative circulating methylated DNA assay for detection of metastatic breast cancer and for monitoring response to therapy. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p2-06-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background- The ability to consistently detect cell-free tumor-specific DNA in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer provides the opportunity to detect changes in tumor burden and to monitor response to treatment. Studies of cell-free DNA in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients suggest that methylated DNA markers in serum or plasma could be used for detection of advanced disease, monitoring of therapeutic response, and for early detection of disease recurrence.
Methods- A genome-wide serum DNA methylome array (Illumina HumanMethylation27 BeadChip) analysis was conducted on cell-free circulating DNA in serum from women with stage IV recurrent breast cancer, and 232 key CpG loci were identified. Methylation for this panel of 10 gene loci was evaluated using our newly developed cMethDNA assay to detect miniscule amounts of methylated DNA in Training and Test sets of sera from a total of 112 women (n = 55 normal, n = 57 metastatic breast cancer). The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay, along with technical reproducibility, was determined. To evaluate the concordance of DNA methylation patterns, the 10 gene panel was tested on 22 DNA sets of primary tumor, metastases and serum from the same patient. Finally, the ability of cMethDNA to monitor response to therapy was evaluated in 28 patients with metastatic disease.
Results- A normal laboratory threshold of 7 cumulative methylation units was set and assay parameters were locked, based on Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses of DNA from 300 ul of patient sera in the Training set (normal, n = 28; cancer, n = 24; 92% sensitivity, 96% specificity, and AUC = 0.950). Evaluation of the Test set of patient sera (normal, n = 27; cancer n = 33) resulted in detection of metastatic breast cancer with 91% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and AUC = 0.994 (0.984-1.005, p<0.0001). Reproducibility of the cMethDNA assay increased with copy number; with the highest variation at 50 copies (CV = 29.1%) and the lowest at 3,200 copies (CV = 2.5%) of methylated DNA. The test was shown to be operator independent (ICC = 0.99). Evaluation of concordance between primary and disseminated tumor methylation showed that the methylation pattern from any given individual is highly conserved between serum, primary tissue and their metastases, and poorly conserved between different individuals. cMethDNA analysis of 28 patients before and after initiation of therapy showed a decrease in cumulative methylation in women with stable/responsive disease and a correlation with disease progression free survival (p<0.0001).
Conclusion- Together, our data suggest that the cMethDNA test 1) can detect tumor DNA shed into blood, 2) reflect the methylation alterations typical of the primary tumor and its metastatic lesions, and 3) reflect response to treatment after chemotherapy. Next, we will test the clinical utility of cMethDNA in independent clinical trial sample sets where it's complementary and independent roles will be examined against CA15.3 and CTC assays.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-06-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MJ Fackler
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - ZL Bujanda
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - C Umbricht
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - WW Teo
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Z Zhang
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - K Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - S Jeter
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - P Argani
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - C Wang
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - JN Ingle
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - J Boughey
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - K McGuire
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - TA King
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - LA Carey
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - LA Cope
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - S Sukumar
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sukumar S, Fackler MJ, Lopez-Bujanda Z, Teo WW, Jeter S, Umbricht C, Visvanathan K, Wolff AC. Abstract P2-02-01: Accurate identification of metastatic breast cancer using methylated gene markers in circulating free DNA in peripheral blood. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p2-02-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Preliminary studies from our lab have shown that a panel of methylation markers in tissue identifies 100% of tested breast cancer and 95% of tested DCIS, and has high accuracy in cells from ductal fluid and spontaneous nipple discharge1,2. Other groups have reported on the use of a single marker or a panel of markers to detect breast cancer in serum or plasma. Cell-free DNA studies in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients with advanced disease or with early-stage disease after completion of local therapy support the hypothesis that methylated DNA markers in serum or plasma could be used to monitor response to therapy and for long-term surveillance. Validation studies to test these hypotheses have been hampered by assay methodological issues such as the very small amount of DNA shed in the serum by tumor compared to the total DNA shed by normal cells.
Methods: To overcome this problem, we developed a modified quantitative methylation-specific PCR that directly measures the number of copies of methylated DNA markers in a small aliquot of serum (Serum-QM-MSP) and robustly detects less than 25 copies of DNA in 300 µL of serum. We then conducted a genome-wide methylome analysis to identify key markers that are preferentially methylated in serum from women with breast cancer and compared the profiles to those from women with no breast cancer. We then analyzed 300 µL each of sera from 55 normal women (single time point) and 43 women with metastatic breast cancer using this newly developed panel of markers and the Serum-QM-MSP assay. We also examined changes after therapy in a subset of patients with metastatic disease.
Results: Methylation markers were quantitatively detected in sera of 39 out of 43 (91% sensitive) metastatic breast cancer patients with varying tumor burdens, and not in sera of any of 55 women (100% specific) for an AUC=0.95, using a laboratory threshold of 7.2 cumulative methylation units. 28 of the 43 patients had sampling repeated 3–5 weeks after therapy started. Sera from patients whose tumors regressed and from those that had stable disease showed a quantitative reduction, while those with progressive disease showed an increase in methylation levels of several genes.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that methylated DNA in serum accurately discriminates between blood samples from normal women and from metastatic breast cancer patients. Also, early changes after therapy initiation for metastatic disease may correlate with subsequent clinical outcome. Assay analytical validation studies are ongoing. Studies examining a potential role in surveillance in the adjuvant setting and therapeutic benefit in the metastatic setting are warranted.
1. Fackler MJ et al. Genome-wide methylation analysis identifies genes specific to breast cancer hormone receptor status and risk of recurrence. Cancer Res. 2011 Oct 1;71(19):6195–207. PMCID: PMC3308629. 2. Fackler MJ, et al. Hypermethylated genes as biomarkers of cancer in women with pathologic nipple discharge. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jun 1;15(11):3802–11. PMID: 19470737
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sukumar
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - MJ Fackler
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - WW Teo
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - S Jeter
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - C Umbricht
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - K Visvanathan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wolff AC. Abstract ES1-2: The Practical Use of Molecular Profiling: The View of a Medical Oncologist. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-es1-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Adjuvant therapy changed the natural of early stage breast cancer. Starting in the 1970s, randomized trials have shown a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in operable, node-pos disease. Since 1985, the Oxford Overview led the rapid adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy (for ER-neg disease) and tamoxifen (for ER-pos disease), and this trend accelerated after the 1988 NCI Clinical Alert on adjuvant chemotherapy in node-neg disease. However, this was not without controversy. In 1990, an NIH Consensus Development Conference concluded that “… some degree of improvement (from adjuvant therapy) may be so small that they are outweighed by the disadvantages of therapy.” Soon, adjuvant chemotherapy also became a standard in ER-pos, node-neg disease.
Starting in the mid 1990s, data began to suggest that not all patients with ER-pos disease benefitted from chemotherapy. Decision algorithms based on routine clinicopathologic factors (eg, TNM, grade, ER, and HER2) proved quite useful for decision-making for the average patient. But by the early 2000s, new molecular tools to stratify recurrence risk (prognosis) and likelihood of benefit from chemotherapy (prediction) became available in clinical practice to further individualize clinical decisions. Prospective-retrospective studies tested the prognostic/predictive utility of Oncotype DX. Soon, it became clear that it and routine clinicopathologic parameters offered independent prognostic utility in ER-pos disease. The TailoRx (node-neg) and RxPONDER (node-pos) trials are now prospectively testing Oncotype DX to guide the decision to add chemotherapy to endocrine therapy in patients with a lower/intermediate recurrence score. Mammaprint became the first FDA-cleared IVDMIA assay, and the MINDACT study directly addresses this predictive utility question by having randomized patients with a discordant result (compared to Adjuvant! Online) also receive chemotherapy or not.
Patients with HER2-pos disease are offered HER2-directed therapy plus chemotherapy. Consequently, a clinical decision gap exists in triple-neg disease (TNBC), which affects 50,000 women just in the US each year. Decision algorithms for them are exclusively based on clinicopathological factors like TNM, grade, and HER2, as molecular assays like Oncotype DX and MammaPrint have no role in this setting. New molecular assays based on DNA methylation, immune markers, or other gene expression signatures are under development. In the meantime, adjuvant chemotherapy is routinely offered to all TNBC patients with at least T1b tumors, despite the fact that most patients with ER-neg, node-neg disease remain disease-free long-term when treated with just locoregional therapy.
Various studies examined clinical decisions based on standard clinicopathologic parameters alone or with knowledge of molecular assay results. However, data beyond costs of care are needed to assess their independent and complementary role to improve the most important clinical outcome to patients (i.e., survival). Until then, access to accurate routine clinicopathologic markers for all patients worldwide remains critical to ensure the most optimal outcome to all patients in high and low income countries.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr ES1-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AC Wolff
- Johns Hopkins Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Freedman RA, Gelman RS, Wefel JS, Krop IE, Melisko ME, Ly A, Agar NYR, Connolly RM, Blackwell KL, Nabell LM, Ingle JN, Van Poznak CH, Puhalla SL, Niravath PA, Ryabin N, Wolff AC, Winer EP, Lin N. Abstract OT1-1-11: TBCRC 022: Phase II Trial of Neratinib for Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Breast cancer and Brain Metastases. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-ot1-1-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: 1/3 of women with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer will develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases yet evidence-based treatments for women with progressive CNS disease are limited. Neratinib is an irreversible inhibitor of erbB1, HER2, and erbB4 which has promising activity in HER2+ breast cancer. Preclinical evidence suggests it may cross the blood brain barrier.
Trial Design: This is a multicenter, phase II, open-label study of neratinib for patients with HER2+ breast cancer and brain metastases. Neratinib is administered at 240 mg orally daily during a 28 day cycle. Two cohorts will be enrolled: Cohort 1 will enroll 40 patients with progressive CNS disease; cohort 2 will enroll ≤5 patients who are candidates for surgical excision of intracranial disease. Surgical candidates receive neratinib 7–21 days preoperatively and resume postoperatively. All patients are re-staged every 2 cycles. Those who develop non-CNS progression have an option to extend therapy with trastuzumab+neratinib. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are collected at baseline and progression; neurocognitive testing, HADS and EORTC QLQ30/BN20 measures are administered at baseline, cycle 2, cycle 3, and progression (cohort 1). Intracranial tumor, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma are collected at surgery (cohort 2).
Specific Aims: The primary endpoint is CNS objective response rate (ORR) by composite criteria. Additional endpoints include: non-CNS ORR, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), site of 1st progression, and toxicity. Correlative and exploratory endpoints include association of CTC count and OS and longitudinal neurocognitive function and quality of life. In an exploratory analysis (cohort 2), we will quantify neratinib concentrations in CSF, intracranial tissue, and plasma and examine associations with response.
Eligibility: Patients must have confirmed HER2+ metastatic disease with ≥1 parenchymal brain lesion measuring ≥10 mm that is new or progressed after completing ≥1 line of standard CNS-directed treatment (cohort 1) or CNS disease that is amenable for surgery, including those without prior CNS treatments (cohort 2). Additional eligibility criteria (cohorts 1,2) include: adequate performance status and end organ/marrow function, and ejection fraction ≥50%. Any number of prior lines of therapy is allowed, including prior lapatinib.
Statistical Methods: Cohort 1 has a 2-stage design with up to 40 patients. CNS ORR is defined as ≥50% reduction in sum volume of CNS target lesions, without evidence of new lesions, progression of non-target CNS lesions, non-CNS disease progression, worsening neurological symptoms, or increase in corticosteroids. CNS lesion measurements are performed centrally by the Harvard Tumor Imaging Metrics Core. If 1/18 patients have a CNS response in the 1st stage, another 22 patients will enroll. With this design, if ≥5 of 40 patients achieve a CNS response, the drug will be deemed worthy of future study. This 2-stage design has 92% power to distinguish between a true CNS ORR of 20% and a null of 6% (one-sided type I error rate=9%).
Accrual: Accrual has begun. Target=45 (cohort 1=40, cohort 2=5)
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-1-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- RA Freedman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - RS Gelman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - JS Wefel
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - IE Krop
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - ME Melisko
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - A Ly
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - NYR Agar
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - RM Connolly
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - KL Blackwell
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - LM Nabell
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - JN Ingle
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - CH Van Poznak
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - SL Puhalla
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - PA Niravath
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - N Ryabin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - AC Wolff
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - EP Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| | - N Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of California, San Francisco, CA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Duke University, Durham, NC; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Univerity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Baylor, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yap JT, Locascio T, Najita JS, Mayer IA, Hobday TJ, Falkson CI, Dees EC, Gelman RS, Rimawi MF, Nanda R, Berkowitz J, Franchetti Y, Wolff AC, Winer EP, Lin NU, Van den Abbeele AD. P2-09-07: Metabolic Response by FDG-PET in Patients (pts) Receiving Trastuzumab (T) and Lapatinib (L) for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Correlative Analysis of TBCRC 003. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p2-09-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We evaluated the safety and efficacy of L+T in pts with 0–2 prior lines of chemotherapy (CT) for HER2+ MBC. In the context of this phase II trial, we evaluated metabolic response by FDG-PET and explored the relationship between metabolic response and clinical outcomes.
Methods: Pts with measurable, HER2+ MBC were eligible. Cohort 1: No prior T, L, or CT +T for MBC, and >1 yr from adjuvant T, if received. Cohort 2: 1–2 prior lines of CT for MBC, including T, or relapse within 1 yr of adjuvant T. Pts received L 1,000 mg QD + T (2 mg/kg weekly or 6 mg/kg Q3W). Staging studies were done with CT or MRI at baseline (BL) and every 2 cycles (1 cycle=4 weeks [wks]). Objective response was assessed by local investigator according to RECIST 1.0. FDG-PET/CT was performed at BL, Wk 1, and Wk 8 per NCI guidelines. Central quality assurance, review, and analysis were performed on FDG-PET studies. Up to 5 target lesions were identified on BL FDG-PET images based on hypermetabolic uptake. Percent change in the summed maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of target lesions was calculated at Wk 1 or Wk 8, compared to BL. Metabolic response was assessed according to EORTC criteria for % change in SUVmax (progressive disease [PD]: ≥25% increase; partial response [PR]: ≥25% decrease; stable disease [SD]: <25% change). Metabolic response at Wk 1 was compared to Wk 8 as well as to clinical outcome, including objective response, clinical benefit, and progression-free survival (PFS).
Results: 87 pts were registered to the study. Of these, one pt did not begin protocol therapy and one pt did not have MBC on further testing, and are not included. 81/85 pts had FDG-PET data at Wk 1; 75/85 had data at Wk 8. Metabolic PR at Wk 1 was observed in 28/39 (72%) pts in Cohort 1 and 20/42 (48%) pts in Cohort 2. Metabolic PR at Wk 8 was observed in 27/34 (79%) pts in Cohort 1 and 18/41 (44%) pts in Cohort 2. Wk 1 and Wk 8 metabolic responses were similar. In cohort 1, 18/28 (64%) pts who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR had clinical benefit by RECIST. Of pts with Wk 1 metabolic SD, 2/9 (22%) had clinical benefit. In cohort 2, 9/20 (45%) pts who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR had clinical benefit; 5/22 (23%) who achieved Week 1 metabolic SD had clinical benefit. Exploratory analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) showed that pts in Cohort 1 who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR experienced a median PFS of 9.3 months ([mos]; 95% CI 5.6−22.3); for pts with metabolic SD, median PFS was 1.9 mos (95% CI 0.8−5.5). For pts in Cohort 2, Wk 1 metabolic PR was associated with median PFS of 5.6 mos (95% CI 3.7−7.8), whereas for pts with metabolic SD, median PFS was 3.7 mos (95% CI 1.8−5.5).
Conclusions: L+T is associated with a high rate of early and sustained metabolic response by FDG-PET. Exploratory analyses suggest that metabolic PR may be associated with clinical benefit and longer PFS.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JT Yap
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - T Locascio
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - JS Najita
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - IA Mayer
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - TJ Hobday
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - CI Falkson
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - EC Dees
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - RS Gelman
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - MF Rimawi
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - R Nanda
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - J Berkowitz
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Y Franchetti
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - AC Wolff
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - EP Winer
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - NU Lin
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - AD Van den Abbeele
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mayer EL, Ligibel JA, Burstein HJ, Peppercorn JM, Miller KD, Carey LA, Dickler MN, Mayer IA, Forero A, Eng-Wong J, Pletcher PJ, Ryabin N, Gelman R, Wolff AC, Winer EP. OT3-02-04: TBCRC 012: ABCDE, a Phase II Randomized Study of Adjuvant Bevacizumab, Metronomic Chemotherapy (CM), Diet and Exercise after Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-ot3-02-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Patients (pts) with residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are at increased risk of recurrence; no proven risk-reduction strategies exist, supporting exploration of novel therapies in the post-preoperative setting. Bevacizumab (B) combined with chemotherapy is active in metastatic disease; ongoing studies are exploring the efficacy of adjuvant combination chemotherapy and B. DFCI 05–055 (Mayer et al, ASCO 2007, 2008) demonstrated the feasibility of 1 year B after preoperative chemotherapy. Also, increasing data support risk reduction through lifestyle interventions (Segal, Ligibel et al, ASCO 2011). The ABCDE trial was designed to evaluate extended adjuvant B in a high risk post-preoperative cohort, and also assess the contribution of exercise to a dietary intervention.
Eligibility Criteria Eligible pts have HER2− breast cancer and have received preoperative anthracycline and/or taxane-based chemotherapy with residual invasive disease at surgery. Acceptable stages include: triple negative if preop stages I-III, or ER+/PR+ if stage III preop or IIB postop. Acceptable organ function and standard B exclusions apply. Registration must occur between 28–180 days after last surgery.
Specific Aims Primary endpoint is recurrence-free survival at a median follow-up of 6 years. Secondary endpoints include B pharmacogenomics, evaluation of the impact of exercise on quality of life and biomarkers associated with recurrence, and prospective examination of cardiac toxicity. Residual tissue-based predictors of outcome will be extensively explored, including PAM50, Ki67, and VEGF hypoxia signature.
Methods This is a 2 × 2 randomized study with a first randomization to 6 months (mo) B 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks (wks) plus 6 mo CM (C 50 mg daily, M 2.5 mg twice daily days 1, 2 each wk), followed by 2.5 years B 15 mg/kg every 6–8 wks, versus observation. A second randomization is to a 1 year telephone-based lifestyle intervention, offering dietary modification alone, or in combination with a structured exercise program.
Statistical Methods and Accrual Total sample size is 660 pts within the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium. Overall power is 0.80 to detect a hazard ratio of 0.59−0.68, depending on pt population. Accrual initiated early 2011 and is expected to continue for the next 36 months.
Conclusions Patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy are at high risk of recurrence and have unmet medical needs. To our knowledge, this is the only trial testing a prolonged but less intensive adjuvant B schedule in this clinical setting. Results of this study could have critical implications for the management of this patient population and for the design of future clinical trials with anti-angiogenic agents.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- EL Mayer
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - JA Ligibel
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - HJ Burstein
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - JM Peppercorn
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - KD Miller
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - LA Carey
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - MN Dickler
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - IA Mayer
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Forero
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - J Eng-Wong
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - PJ Pletcher
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - N Ryabin
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - R Gelman
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - AC Wolff
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - EP Winer
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Durham, NC; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Hoosier Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IN; Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wolff AC, Pesut B, Regan S. New graduate nurse practice readiness: perspectives on the context shaping our understanding and expectations. Nurse Educ Today 2010; 30:187-91. [PMID: 19699561 DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2008] [Revised: 07/09/2009] [Accepted: 07/26/2009] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Workforce shortages, fiscal restraint, complex healthcare organizations, increasing patient acuity, the explosion of knowledge and technology and the ever expanding role of nurses in healthcare have reinforced the importance of new graduates arriving in the work setting with the ability to move seamlessly into practice. This idea of moving seamlessly into practice is often referred to as practice readiness. Differing perspectives exist between nurses in the practice and education sector about the practice readiness of new graduates. The aim of this study was to understand the perspectives of nurses about new graduate nurse practice readiness and the underlying context shaping these perspectives. Focus groups involving 150 nurses with varying years of experience in the practice, education and regulatory sector were conducted. The findings revealed that participants' expectations and understandings of new graduate practice readiness were influenced by the historical and social context within which nursing education and professional practice is grounded. These differences centered around three main areas: the educational preparation of nurses (diploma or degree), the preparation of the technical versus the professional nurse, and the perceived responsibilities and accountabilities of the education and practice sector for the educational preparation of nurses. To shift the discourse around practice readiness, nurses from all sectors must focus on unique, innovative and cooperative solutions to ensure the seamless transition of all nursing graduates in the 21st century healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela C Wolff
- Professional Practice and Integration, Fraser Health Authority, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3T 5X3.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Snyder CF, Stein KB, Barone BB, Peairs KS, Yeh HC, Derr RL, Wolff AC, Carducci MA, Brancati FL. Does pre-existing diabetes affect prostate cancer prognosis? A systematic review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2009; 13:58-64. [PMID: 20145631 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2009.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
To summarize the influence of pre-existing diabetes on mortality and morbidity in men with prostate cancer. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception through 1 October 2008. Search terms were related to diabetes, cancer and prognosis. Studies were included if they reported an original data analysis of prostate cancer prognosis, compared outcomes between men with and without diabetes and were in English. Titles, abstracts and articles were reviewed independently by two authors. Conflicts were settled by consensus or third review. We abstracted data on study design, analytic methods, outcomes and quality. We summarized mortality and morbidity outcomes qualitatively and conducted a preliminary meta-analysis to quantify the risk of long-term (>3 months), overall mortality. In total, 11 articles were included in the review. Overall, one of four studies found increased prostate cancer mortality, one of two studies found increased nonprostate cancer mortality and one study found increased 30-day mortality. Data from four studies could be included in a preliminary meta-analysis for long-term, overall mortality and produced a pooled hazard ratio of 1.57 (95% CI: 1.12-2.20). Diabetes was also associated with receiving radiation therapy, complication rates, recurrence and treatment failure. Our analysis suggests that pre-existing diabetes affects the treatment and outcomes of men with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C F Snyder
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rugo HS, Carey LA, Mayer E, Marcom PK, Liu M, Ma C, Storniolo AM, Forero A, Esteva FJ, Wolff AC, Hobday T, Ferraro M, Davidson NE, Winer EP, Moore D, Scott J, Park JW. Assays of circulating tumor cells and outcome in the triple-negative breast cancer trial TBCRC001. Cancer Res 2009. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-6048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract #6048
Introduction. Basal-like breast cancer (BBC) has low expression of ER, PR, and HER2, and is often called triple negative (TN) BrCa. TBCRC 001 is a multicenter randomized phase II study of cetuximab (C) alone or combined with carboplatin (P) in TN BrCa. Pts randomized to Arm 1 received C alone (400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly) with P (AUC 2, 3 of 4 weeks) added upon progression (PD). Pts on Arm 2 received C+P throughout. The primary endpoint was objective response. To explore markers of activity and response, we measured circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in pts on study and directly compared two methods of CTC enumeration; CellSearch (Veridex) and immunomagnetic enrichment followed by flow cytometry (IE/FC). A subset of samples were isolated for molecular profiling.
 Methods. Blood was obtained from consenting pts at baseline, 7 to 14 days after the first infusion, then monthly until the end of the study. CellSearch assay was performed as previously described using 7.5 cc blood in a CellSave tube and the CellSpotter analyzer, and the percent of CTCs staining for EGFR was also measured. For IE/FC, 20 ml of blood was subjected to IE using anti-EpCAM MAb-conjugated iron particles, followed by multiparameter FC for EpCAM, CD45, and nucleic acid content. CTC results were correlated by method, and to time on study treatment. In this preliminary analysis, the endpoint is time on study treatment (to progression/toxicity, TST).
 Results: Safety and efficacy data from arms 1 and 2 have been presented (Carey et al; SABCS 2007, ASCO 2008). Of 102 TN pts enrolled in this study, 65 had CTC measurements by both methods on at least one time point. CTC levels by the two assays were highly correlated at all time points. At baseline, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.67 (p<0.0001). Using the cutoffs shown below, CTC by IE/FC or CellSearch at baseline and first follow-up correlated with TST. This relationship was observed in both arm 1 and 2.
 
 Conclusion: In this phase II trial of C or C+P in pts with TN metastatic BrCa, CTCs measured by two different techniques were highly correlated. CTC levels at baseline and 7-14 days predicted longer vs. shorter TST, suggesting that CTCs may be an early marker of response to targeted therapy. Additional molecular data on CTCs will be presented.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6048.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - M Liu
- 5 Georgetown, Washington DC
| | - C Ma
- 6 Washington U, St. Louis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Haux R, Ammenwerth E, Häber A, Hübner-Bloder G, Knaup-Gregori P, Lechleitner G, Leiner F, Weber R, Winter A, Wolff AC. Medical informatics education needs information system practicums in health care settings--experiences and lessons learned from 32 practicums at four universities in two countries. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45:294-9. [PMID: 16685339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report about the themes and about experiences with practicums in the management of information systems in health care settings (health information management) for medical informatics students. METHODS We first summarize the topics of the health information management practicums/projects that the authors organized between 1990 and 2003 for the medical informatics programs at Heidelberg/Heilbronn, Germany, UMIT, Austria, as well as for the informatics program at the University of Leipzig, Germany. Experiences and lessons learned, obtained from the faculty that organized the practicums in the past 14 years, are reported. RESULTS Thirty (of 32) health information management practicums focused on the analysis of health information systems. These took place inside university medical centers. Although the practicums were time-intensive and required intensively tutoring students with regard to health information management and project management, feedback from the students and graduates was mainly positive. DISCUSSION It is clearly recommended that students specializing in medical informatics need to be confronted with real-world problems of health information systems during their studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Haux
- Technical University of Braunschweig, Institute for Medical Informatics, Muehlenpfordtstr. 23, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Garde S, Wolff AC, Kutscha U, Wetter T, Knaup P. CSI-ISC--Concepts for smooth integration of health care information system components into established processes of patient care. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45:10-8. [PMID: 16482365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The introduction of information system components (ISCs) usually leads to a change in existing processes, e.g. processes of patient care. These processes might become even more complex and variable than before. An early participation of end users and a better understanding of human factors during design and introduction of ISCs are key factors for a successful introduction of ISCs in health care. Nonetheless no specialized methods have been developed until now to systematically support the integration of ISCs in existing processes of patient care while taking into account these requirements. In this paper, therefore, we introduce a procedure model to implement Concepts for Smooth Integration of ISCs (CSI-ISC). METHODS Established theories from economics and social sciences have been applied in our model, among them the stress-strain-concept, the contrastive task analysis (KABA), and the phase model for the management of information systems. RESULTS CSI-ISC is based on the fact that while introducing new information system components, users experience additional workload. One essential aim during the introduction process therefore should be to systematically identify, prioritize and ameliorate workloads that are being imposed on human beings by information technology in health care. To support this, CSI-ISC consists of a static part (workload framework) and a dynamic part (guideline for the introduction of information system components into existing processes of patient care). CONCLUSIONS The application of CSI-ISC offers the potential to minimize additional workload caused by information system components systematically. CSI-ISC rationalizes decisions and supports the integration of the information system component into existing processes of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Garde
- Department of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bott OJ, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B, Knaup P, Lang E, Pilgram R, Pfeifer B, Ruderich F, Wolff AC, Haux R, Kulikowski C. The challenge of ubiquitous computing in health care: technology, concepts and solutions. Findings from the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2005. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44:473-9. [PMID: 16113776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review recent research efforts in the field of ubiquitous computing in health care. To identify current research trends and further challenges for medical informatics. METHODS Analysis of the contents of the Yearbook on Medical Informatics 2005 of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA). RESULTS The Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2005 includes 34 original papers selected from 22 peer-reviewed scientific journals related to several distinct research areas: health and clinical management, patient records, health information systems, medical signal processing and biomedical imaging, decision support, knowledge representation and management, education and consumer informatics as well as bioinformatics. A special section on ubiquitous health care systems is devoted to recent developments in the application of ubiquitous computing in health care. Besides additional synoptical reviews of each of the sections the Yearbook includes invited reviews concerning E-Health strategies, primary care informatics and wearable healthcare. CONCLUSIONS Several publications demonstrate the potential of ubiquitous computing to enhance effectiveness of health services delivery and organization. But ubiquitous computing is also a societal challenge, caused by the surrounding but unobtrusive character of this technology. Contributions from nearly all of the established sub-disciplines of medical informatics are demanded to turn the visions of this promising new research field into reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O J Bott
- Technical University of Braunschweig, Institute for Medical Informatics, Mühlenpfordtstr. 23, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rudek MA, Sparreboom A, Garrett-Mayer ES, Armstrong DK, Wolff AC, Verweij J, Baker SD. Factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability following doxorubicin and docetaxel-based therapy. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40:1170-8. [PMID: 15110880 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2003] [Accepted: 12/23/2003] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Current dosing strategies for anticancer drugs result in wide interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Here, we explored the influence of age, body size, concomitant drugs, dose, infusion duration, and sex on the clearance for doxorubicin and docetaxel in 243 individual patients. Patients received doxorubicin (n=110) or docetaxel (n=152) as monotherapy or in combination chemotherapy regimens. The mean (+/-S.D.) clearance was 63.6+/-22.7 L/h for doxorubicin and 42.8+/-14.9 L/h for docetaxel. Normalisation for body surface area (BSA) reduced the interindividual variability by only <1.7%. Doxorubicin clearance was significantly reduced when administered at doses >50 mg/m(2) or in combination with cyclophosphamide. Upper extremes of body size were associated with increased clearance for both drugs, whereas no consistent effect of age on clearance was discerned. Overall, these findings suggest that incorporation of variables in addition to BSA should be considered in routine dosing strategies for doxorubicin and docetaxel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Rudek
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21231-1000, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Knaup P, Ammenwerth E, Brandner R, Brigl B, Fischer G, Garde S, Lang E, Pilgram R, Ruderich F, Singer R, Wolff AC, Haux R, Kulikowski C. Towards clinical bioinformatics: advancing genomic medicine with informatics methods and tools. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43:302-7. [PMID: 15227561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To summarize the challenges facing clinical applications in the light of growing research results in genomic medicine and bioinformatics. METHODS Analysis of the contents of the Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2004 of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA). RESULTS The Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2004 includes 32 articles selected from 22 peer-reviewed scientific journals. A special section on clinical bioinformatics highlights recent developments in this field. Several guest editors review the promises and limitations of available methods and resources from biomedical informatics that are relevant to clinical medicine. Integrated data and knowledge resources are generally regarded to be central and key issues for clinical bioinformatics. Further review papers deal with public health implications of bioinformatics, knowledge management and trends in health care education. The Yearbook includes for the first time a section on the history of medical informatics, where the significant impact of the Reisensburg protocol 1973 on international health and medical informatics education is examined. CONCLUSIONS Close collaboration between bioinformatics and medical informatics researchers can contribute to new insights in genomic medicine and contribute towards the more efficient and effective use of genomic data to advance clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Knaup
- University of Heidelberg, Department of Medical Informatics, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ammenwerth E, Haux R, Kulikowski C, Bohne A, Brandner R, Brigl B, Fischer G, Garde S, Knaup P, Ruderich F, Schubert R, Singer R, Wolff AC. Medical informatics and the quality of health: new approaches to support patient care - findings from the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2003. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42:185-9. [PMID: 12743656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Yearbook of Medical Informatics is published annually by the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) and contains a selection of excellent papers on medical informatics research which have been recently published (http://www. yearbook.uni-hd.de). The 2003 Yearbook of Medical Informatics took as its theme the role of medical informatics for the quality of health care. In this paper, we will discuss challenges for health care, and the lessons learned from editing IMIA Yearbook 2003. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Modern information processing methodology and information and communication technology have strongly influenced our societies and health care. As a consequence of this, medical informatics as a discipline has taken a leading role in the further development of health care. This involves developing information systems that enhance opportunities for global access to health services and medical knowledge. Informatics methodology and technology will facilitate high quality of care in aging societies, and will decrease the possibilities of health care errors. It will also enable the dissemination of the latest medical and health information on the web to consumers and health care providers alike. The selected papers of the IMIA Yearbook 2003 present clear examples and future challenges, and they highlight how various sub-disciplines of medical informatics can contribute to this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Ammenwerth
- University for Health Informatics and Technology Tyrol (UMIT), Research Group Assessment of Health Information Systems, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
van der Haak M, Wolff AC, Brandner R, Drings P, Wannenmacher M, Wetter T. Data security and protection in cross-institutional electronic patient records. Int J Med Inform 2003; 70:117-30. [PMID: 12909163 DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(03)00033-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
This paper aims at identifying the specific legal requirements concerning data security and data protection of patient health data that apply to a cross-institutional electronic patient record (EPR) and describes possible solutions for meeting these requirements. In Germany, the legal framework for such records provide that disclosure of patient health information to physicians of third-party institutions is only allowed in case that it is necessary for the joint treatment of the patient, i.e. in case of a "treatment connection". As a first step, the functionality of a remote-access architecture was proven allowing a one-way connection between the EPR systems of two health institutions in Germany, which jointly treat tumor patients. Besides, a signature system model for ensuring the integrity and authenticity of medical documents was developed and implemented in the existing information system architecture of the University Medical Center of Heidelberg. Especially in Germany, the legal framework for cross-institutional EPRs is very complex and has a considerable influence on the development and implementation of cross-institutional EPRs. However, its introduction is thought to be valuable, since a cross-institutional EPR will improve communication within shared care processes, and thus improve the quality of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M van der Haak
- Department of Medical Informatics, Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
van der Haak M, Mludek V, Wolff AC, Bülzebruck H, Oetzel D, Zierhut D, Drings P, Wannenmacher M, Haux R. Networking in shared care--first steps towards a shared electronic patient record for cancer patients. Methods Inf Med 2003; 41:419-25. [PMID: 12501815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This paper aims at identifying the data protection and security requirements for a cross-institutional EPR. Three possible models and the first steps towards a cross-institutional EPR for the Thoraxklinik Heidelberg and the Department of Clinical Radiology of the University Medical Center of Heidelberg shall be discussed. METHODS A comprehensive analysis of literature and legal documents supplied information for determining the data protection and security requirements. By means of information system analysis, the technical preconditions in both institutions as well as three possible models towards a cross-institutional EPR were identified. RESULTS According to the German penal code it is only allowed to reveal patient information to external physicians in cases of so-called "treatment connection". An extension of the written consent, signed by the patient, verifying the patient agreement that his/her patient data will be stored in a cross-institutional EPR is needed. Among the three models that we identified, the model that constitutes of a virtual EPR with distributed data capture in both institutions was favored. By means of SecuRemote software a secure connection between the Thoraxklinik Heidelberg and the Department of Clinical Radiology was established, allowing the physicians to view the complete cross-institutional health information of a jointly treated patient during the weekly consultation on radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Many requirements listed in this paper are requirements for electronic patient records in general. Besides these general requirements there are specific requirements for a cross-institutional EPR. The legal situation in Germany complicates the development and implementation of a cross-institutional EPR. However, we think that the efforts are reasonable, because a cross-institutional EPR will be able to improve the communication between health institutions, medical disciplines and persons involved in shared care processes. It provides them with more complete health information about the jointly treated patients. A cross-institutional EPR is, therefore, expected to improve the quality of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M van der Haak
- Department of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kulikowski C, Ammenwerth E, Bohne A, Ganser K, Haux R, Knaup P, Maier C, Michel A, Singer R, Wolff AC. Medical Imaging Informatics and Medical Informatics: opportunities and constraints. Findings from the IMIA yearbook of Medical Informatics 2002. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41:183-9. [PMID: 12061127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Yearbook of Medical Informatics is published annually by the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) and contains a selection of recent excellent papers on medical informatics research (http://www.yearbook.uni-hd.de). The 2002 Yearbook of Medical Informatics took as its theme the topic of Medical Imaging Informatics. In this paper, we will summarize the contributions of medical informatics researchers to the development of medical imaging informatics, discuss challenges and opportunities of imaging informatics, and present the lessons learned from the IMIA Yearbook 2002. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Medical informatics researchers have contributed to the development of medical imaging methods and systems since the inception of this field approximately 40 years ago. The Yearbook presents selected papers and reviews on this important topic. In addition, as usual, the Yearbook 2002 also contains a variety of papers and reviews on other subjects relevant to medical informatics, such as Bioinformatics, Computer-supported education, Health and clinical management, Health information systems, Knowledge processing and decision support, Patient records, and Signal processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Kulikowski
- Rutgers University, Department of Computer Science, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wolff AC, Mludek V, van der Haak M, Bork W, Bülzebruck H, Drings P, Schmücker P, Wannenmacher M, Haux R. Using the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) in a regional electronic patient record for patients with malignant diseases. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 84:698-702. [PMID: 11604828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
Communication between different institutions which are responsible for the treatment of the same patient is of outstanding significance, especially in the field of tumor diseases. Regional electronic patient records could support the co-operation of different institutions by providing ac-cess to all necessary information whether it belongs to the own institution or to a partner. The Department of Medical Informatics, University of Heidelberg is performing a project in co-operation with the Thoraxclinic-Heidelberg and the Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Heidelberg with the goal: to define an architectural concept for interlinking the electronic patient record of the two clinical institutions to build a common virtual electronic patient record and carry out an exemplary implementation, to examine composition, structure and content of medical documents for tumor patients with the aim of defining an XML-based markup language allowing summarizing overviews and suitable granularities, and to integrate clinical practice guidelines and other external knowledge with the electronic patient record using XML-technologies to support the physician in the daily decision process. This paper will show, how a regional electronic patient record could be built on an architectural level and describe elementary steps towards a on content-oriented structuring of medical records.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Wolff
- Department of Medical Informatics, Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Tamoxifen was the first in a class of drugs now commonly referred to as selective estrogen receptor modulators or SERMs. SERMs exhibit tissue-specific estrogenic agonist/antagonist activity through their ability to bind to the estrogen receptor alpha (ER) protein and interact with coregulatory proteins, thereby modulating transcription of estrogen target genes. Since its first approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1977, tamoxifen has been found to (a) lower the risk of recurrence and death for women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, irrespective of menopausal and node status or use of adjuvant chemotherapy; (b) reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer following breast conservation in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); and (c) reduce the risk of breast cancer in high-risk women. Toremifene is the only other SERM approved by the FDA for breast cancer treatment. However, it offers no clear clinical advantage over tamoxifen in the adjuvant or metastatic settings. Several other SERMs are in various phases of clinical development. In addition, strategies to combine SERMs with other endocrine therapy like ovarian suppression or aromatase inhibitors are active areas of investigations. At present, SERMs are recognized as the first targeted and relatively nontoxic medical therapy for women with high-risk or steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Wolff
- The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
A large body of data on systemic therapy has been presented and published in the past year, including new information on primary risk reduction, patient selection for adjuvant systemic therapy, and anthracycline-analogs. New data on ongoing adjuvant trials (including taxane studies), unpublished updates from the fourth Oxford Overview in September 2000, and provocative data on ovarian ablation were important features of the November 2000 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. Important new data on anti-estrogen therapy, including aromatase inhibitors and pure antiestrogens, further expand the role of the oldest targeted breast cancer therapy. Trastuzumab and other novel compounds are being investigated as single-agents and in combination with conventional systemic approaches. Discussions on the long-term effects of adjuvant therapy have taken center stage also. These and other important ongoing developments since 2000 are examined in this review article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Wolff
- The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231-1000, USA.
| |
Collapse
|